Thursday, February 27, 2025


German family-run machine maker issues SOS to future government


By AFP
February 25, 2025


An employee works on a machine at the Arburg plant 
- Copyright AFP John MACDOUGALL


Jean-Philippe LACOUR

Facing a slowing German economy, high energy bills, onerous bureaucracy and the threat of US tariffs, a Black Forest-based factory equipment maker is issuing a plea for help to the country’s next government.

Arburg’s woes highlight a crisis gripping Germany’s small- and medium-sized “Mittelstand” firms as Europe’s biggest economy struggles, a key challenge for election winner Friedrich Merz as he readies to take over as chancellor.

“We are feeling the effects of the crisis — our turnover fell by around 15 percent last year,” said Armin Schmiedeberg, chairman of the advisory board of the company located in Lossburg in the southwest.

He urged German leaders to swiftly come up with new ways to help business, saying: “There are few recognisable advantages here for manufacturing companies and no strategic approach from politicians.”

The family-owned firm makes machines that produce plastic parts in sectors from the auto industry to electronics and packaging — so-called plastic injection moulding machines, hulking high-tech marvels that weigh up to 40 tons.

Companies like Arburg, which form the backbone of Germany’s economy, have been hit hard by the slowdown at home as well falling demand in key export markets like China.

Merz, whose conservatives won Sunday’s election, has vowed a barrage of measures to revive the recession-ravaged economy, although he first faces the tricky task of forming a working coalition.

Faced with declining sales, Arburg, has had to cut the hours of some of its staff.

And now the company, which has about 3,700 workers worldwide, is facing the threat of US tariffs after Donald Trump’s return as US president.

– US tariff threat –

It is not yet clear if Arburg will be hit with new duties but Schmiedeberg acknowledged it could cause problems.

“Tariffs would result in additional costs that the customer in the United States would have to bear,” he said. “This would, of course, also limit our sales opportunities.”

The firm is getting ready — it is speeding up plans to shift some production overseas, either to North America or Asia, where demand for its products is growing.

With Germany facing storm clouds on the horizon, business groups have wasted no time in calling for the swift formation of a coalition.

They demand rapid steps to boost the ailing economy, which shrank for the past two years and is expected to eke out just meagre growth this year.

Germany has faced political paralysis since the government of Chancellor Olaf Scholz collapsed in November. Even before then, constant feuding in Scholz’s three-party coalition hindered efforts to enact major economic reforms.

Merz’s CDU/CSU bloc is seeking talks with Scholz’s centre-left SPD, which crashed to defeat in Sunday’s poll, about forming a coalition.

– Red tape, costly energy –

A coalition of the two parties would likely enact pro-growth reforms to “ease the regulatory and tax burden on businesses somewhat, and pursue a more rational immigration and a less inefficient and costly energy policy,” said Berenberg bank economist Holger Schmieding.

Such moves couldn’t come too soon for Arburg.

Among Schmiedeberg’s chief complaints is a heavy bureaucratic burden.

“We have to employ the equivalent of 40 full-time employees to meet requirements and regulations and comply with laws,” he said.

He also complained about electricity costs that are “unsustainable for a site in Germany” and poor road infrastructure.

Arburg has to transport its vast machines on narrow country roads before they are shipped to the world.

Despite the challenges, Schmiedeberg said the company’s main base will remain where it has been since its founding in 1923.

“Arburg has remained loyal to its home region for 100 years and will continue to do so,” he said.

“We have no plans to relocate.”


Unilever boss to step down after less than two years at helm


By AFP
February 25, 2025


Unilever chief Hein Schumacher planned to spin off the consumer giant's ice cream division that includes Ben & Jerry’s - Copyright AFP BAY ISMOYO

Alexandra BACON

British consumer goods giant Unilever on Tuesday said chief executive Hein Schumacher will step down on March 1 after less than two years in the post.

The company said in a statement that Schumacher was leaving by “mutual agreement” and would be replaced by finance chief Fernando Fernandez.

The announcement comes shortly after the group, whose brands include Ben & Jerry’s ice cream and Dove soap, reported a slump in profits for 2024.

“While the board is pleased with Unilever’s performance in 2024, there is much further to go to deliver best-in-class results,” Unilever chairman Ian Meakins said in the statement.

Following the announcement, Unilever shares slipped around two percent in early trading on London’s top-tier FTSE 100 index, which was trading higher overall.

Schumacher took over the position in 2023 from Alan Jope who came under fierce criticism from activist investors over a failed takeover bid.

In a bid to revive growth, Schumacher launched a shakeup including axing thousands of jobs and plans to spin off the group’s ice cream business.

But during his time at the helm, he has faced two sets of disappointing annual results, with performance hit last year by the group’s exit from Russia and other restructuring costs.

– ‘Surprise twist’ –

The new strategy has “has put Unilever on a path to higher performance and the board is committed to accelerating its execution”, Meakins added.

He praised Fernandez’s “decisive and results-oriented approach and his ability to drive change at speed”.

Unilever has faced increasing pressure from shareholders, including activist investor Nelson Peltz, to improve flagging performance.

“Unilever’s CEO is stepping down in a surprise twist, cutting short his tenure just as he was steering the consumer goods giant toward a leaner, more profitable future,” said Matt Britzman, senior equity analyst at stockbroker Hargreaves Lansdown.

“With Fernandez poised to build on the groundwork already laid, this unexpected transition might be the spark that helps deliver a new version of Unilever that investors have long been waiting for,” he added.

Fernandez, who has been at the company for almost 40 years, will become CEO after a little over a year as chief financial officer.

He will take over the group’s overhaul plans, which also include Unilever focusing on its 30 highest performing brands that make up 70 percent of the group’s revenue.

The company said its guidance for 2025 remains unchanged from its 2024 earnings statement that forecast only subdued market growth in the near-term.


7-Eleven owner shares plunge as family buyout fails


By AFP
February 26, 2025


With around 85,000 outlets, 7-Eleven is the world's biggest convenience store brand - Copyright AFP/File Kazuhiro NOGI
Julien GIRAULT, Tomohiro OSAKI

Shares in the Japanese owner of 7-Eleven plunged as much as 12 percent on Thursday after the convenience store giant said its founding family failed to put together a white-knight buyout.

Last year Seven & i rejected an offer worth nearly $40 billion from Canadian rival Alimentation Couche-Tard (ACT) which would have been the biggest foreign buyout of a Japanese firm.

Even as ACT reportedly sweetened its bid, Seven & i said in November it was studying a counter-offer from its founding Ito family reportedly worth around eight trillion yen ($54 billion).

The family were reportedly negotiating financing from top Japanese banks as well as companies such as Itochu Corp, which owns the FamilyMart chain.

But Seven & i said Thursday it was “notified that it has become difficult to procure the necessary funds for an official proposal about the acquisition.”

“We will continue to explore and scrutinise all strategic options including the proposal from ACT,” it said in a statement.

Itochu said in its own statement it had “sincerely considered the matter” but that its “consideration on this matter has been terminated.”

– ‘Grossly undervalued’ –

With around 85,000 outlets, 7-Eleven is the world’s biggest convenience store brand.

The franchise began in the United States, but it has been wholly owned by Seven & i since 2005.

ACT, which began with one store in Quebec in 1980, now runs nearly 17,000 convenience store outlets worldwide including the Circle K chain.

In September, when Seven & i rejected the initial takeover offer from ACT, the company said it had “grossly” undervalued its business and could face regulatory hurdles.

Its 7-Eleven stores are a beloved institution in Japan, selling everything from concert tickets to pet food and fresh rice balls, although sales have been flagging.

Japan’s minister for economic revitalisation said in January that the country would study the “economic security” aspects of any foreign acquisition of 7-Eleven.

Ryosei Akazawa highlighted the role Japan’s convenience stores can play in times of crisis, such as after major earthquakes and other disasters, particularly in remote regions.

In 2021, ACT dropped a takeover bid worth 16 billion euros ($17 billion today) for French supermarket Carrefour after the French government said it would veto the deal over food security concerns.

Late morning in Tokyo, Seven & i shares were down 11.2 percent.

Kate Bush leads UK musicians in ‘silent album’ AI fight

By AFP
February 25, 2025


British singer Annie Lennox of the Eurythmics has joined more than 1,000 musicians who have released a silent album to protest proposed changes to UK copyright law around AI - Copyright AFP/File I-Hwa CHENG


Helen ROWE

Over 1,000 musicians including Kate Bush, Annie Lennox and Damon Albarn on Tuesday released a silent album in protest at proposed changes to UK copyright law around artificial intelligence (AI) which they say will legalise music theft.

“Is This What We Want” featuring recordings of empty studios and performance spaces is part of a growing backlash against the government’s plans.

Writers and musicians including Bush also denounced the proposals as a “wholesale giveaway” to Silicon Valley in a letter to The Times newspaper on Tuesday.

Other signatories included Paul McCartney, Elton John, Ed Sheeran, Dua Lipa and Sting as well as writers Kazuo Ishiguro, Michael Morpurgo and Helen Fielding.

In a very rare move, UK newspapers also highlighted their concerns launching a “Make it Fair” campaign featuring wrap round ads on the front of almost every national daily, with an inside editorial by the papers’ editors.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Labour government is considering overhauling the law to allow AI companies to use creators’ content on the internet to help develop their models, unless rights holders opt out.

But artists say opting out will be difficult and onerous.

Album organiser Ed Newton-Rex said musicians were “united in their thorough condemnation of this ill-thought-through plan”.

“The government’s proposal would hand the life’s work of the country’s musicians to AI companies, for free, letting those companies exploit musicians’ work to outcompete them,” he said.

“It is a plan that would not only be disastrous for musicians, but that is totally unnecessary. The UK can be leaders in AI without throwing our world-leading creative industries under the bus,” he added.

– ‘Catastrophic’ –

The album’s release was timed to coincide with the end of the government’s public consultation on the proposed changes.

Starmer has previously said the government needs to “get the balance right” with copyright and AI while noting the technology represented “a huge opportunity”.

Authors have also spoken out about the UK government’s plans.

Best selling US writer Scott Turow last week criticised the “cavalier attitude of the British government” which he said proposed to “allow big tech companies to scrape all of our books and repackage our words as ‘original content’.”

“Instead of trying to prevent this, the British government wants to give them a free pass. That will be catastrophic, not just for writers in the UK, but all over the world,” he wrote in the Daily Mail.

In a rare interview last month, McCartney, 82, one of the two surviving members of The Beatles, told the BBC any new legislation had to protect creative thinkers and artists, warning “you’re not going to have them” without that.

“You get young guys, girls, coming up, and they write a beautiful song, and they don’t own it, and they don’t have anything to do with it. And anyone who wants can just rip it off,” he said.

“The truth is, the money’s going somewhere … Somebody’s getting paid, so why shouldn’t it be the guy who sat down and wrote ‘Yesterday’?”

In 2023, UK music contributed £7.6 billion to the UK economy, with exports of UK music reaching £4.6 billion.

Turkey’s pro-Kurd party teases ‘historic’ news from PKK leader


By AFP
February 26, 2025


A protester waves a flag bearing a portrait of PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan during a demonstration in the Kurdish-majority city of Qamishli in Syria
 - Copyright AFP Delil SOULEIMAN

Turkey’s leading pro-Kurd party said it was expecting a “historic declaration” Thursday from the jailed leader of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), Abdullah Ocalan, amid efforts to end a decades-long conflict with Ankara.

The pro-Kurdish DEM party will send a delegation Thursday to meet Ocalan at his prison on an island off Istanbul, it said in a statement.

The visit, the third in the past few months, comes as Ankara seeks to reset ties with the PKK, which has fought a decades-long insurgency against the Turkish state that has claimed tens of thousands of lives.

“If everything goes smoothly, tomorrow, we expect Ocalan to make a historic declaration,” said DEM, whose visit to the jailed PKK leader was approved by the justice ministry on Wednesday.

It said there would be a statement to the press following the visit, at about 5:00 pm (1400 GMT).

The seven-person delegation, which includes Ocalan’s lawyer, Faik Ozgur Erol, would like the PKK leader to make his expected peace appeal in a video message instead of by writing, but the justice ministry has not yet agreed, Turkish media reported.




– Uncertain extent –

Ocalan, 75, has been serving life without parole on Imrali prison island since his 1999 arrest in Kenya.

But starting in late December, he has been twice visited by two DEM lawmakers who then briefed the parliamentary parties on the content of their talks.

The dialogue with Ocalan is an initiative of ultra-nationalist political leader Devlet Bahceli, a close ally of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and has led to growing anticipation that Ocalan will soon issue a public call to his fighters to lay down their arms, in exchange for concessions for the country’s Kurdish minority.

PKK leaders, who are mostly based in the mountains of Northern Turkey, could then relay Ocalan’s message, Turkish media said.

But the extent of Ocalan’s appeal is uncertain.

Thursday’s delegation includes DEM co-chairs Tulay Hatimogullari and Tuncer Bakirhan, and veteran Kurdish politician Ahmet Turk, 82, who has a long history of involvement in efforts to resolve the Kurdish issue.




Deputy speaker Sirri Sureyya Onder and lawmaker Pervin Buldan, who were both part of the earlier delegations, will also go, as will another DEM lawmaker.

The conflict between PKK rebels and the Turkish state, which erupted in 1984, has claimed more than 40,000 lives.

A previous round of peace talks collapsed in a storm of violence in 2015, after which the Turkish government cut off all contact.




TRUMPLAND BLACKMAIL

Eyeing Trump trade policy shakeup, Eli Lilly to build 4 US factories


By AFP
February 26, 2025


Eli Lilly CEO David Ricks said the Trump administration's trade policy should take into account account companies that make major investments in new US manufacucturing capacity - Copyright AFP/File Sajjad HUSSAIN

US pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly announced Wednesday that it will build four additional new manufacturing sites in the United States in a committment designed to influence upcoming Trump administration decisions on trade and other issues.

The drugmaker, which is in growth mode thanks partly to the success of anti-obesity drugs Zepbound and Mounjaro, expects to add more than 3,000 jobs at the four sites as it committed to tens of billions of dollars in additional investment.

Chief Executive David Ricks said in a statement the boosted capital spending underscores the company’s “optimism about the potential of our pipeline” and determination to “stay ahead of anticipated demand for safe, high-quality, FDA-approved medicines of the future.”

The move, announced at a Washington news conference, comes as Trump proceeds with a deluge of tariff actions and proposed tax cut extensions designed to incentivize global companies to invest in the United States. Trump’s administration is also undertaking deep job cuts across the US regulatory universe that could affect such processes as the application for new drugs.

The company’s press release described Trump’s 2017 corporate tax cut as “foundational to Lilly’s domestic manufacturing investments,” adding that “it is essential that these policies are extended this year.”

In an interview with CNBC, Ricks said he would call on the Trump administration to address lengthy permitting times to build new facilities due to onerous requirements of the US Food and Drug Administration.

Ricks also aims to influence the “contours” of Trump’s trade policy, saying “it makes no sense to punish companies that are pursuing this agenda with the administration and on behalf of the American people.”

Wednesday’s announcement will raise Lilly’s domestic capital expansion commitment to $50 billion from $23 billion previously committed between 2020 and 2024 to construct or expand sites in the states of North Carolina, Indiana and Wisconsin.

The company is “currently in negotiations with several states and welcomes additional interest by March 12, 2025,” said a press release that included a link to express interest online.

Shares of Lilly rose 1.7 percent shortly after midday.
Panama AG agrees Hong Kong firm’s canal concession is ‘unconstitutional’

THE TRUMP EFFECT


By AFP
February 26, 2025

The Panama Ports Company, a subsidiary of CK Hutchison, manages two of the canal's five ports - Copyright AFP/File Martin BERNETTI

Panama’s attorney general said Wednesday that concession granted to a Hong Kong-based firm to operate ports on either end of the Panama Canal should be scrapped for being “unconstitutional.”

The contract held by CK Hutchison Holdings, owned by Hong Kong billionaire Li Ka-shing, has been at the root of US President Donald Trump’s concerns for Chinese influence over the waterway.

The Panama Ports Company, a subsidiary of CK Hutchison, manages two of the canal’s five ports, an arrangement in place since 1997 via a concession from the Panama government.

Last week, Panama’s Supreme Court agreed to consider a request filed by a lawyer to nullify the contract — the second such challenge before it.

On Wednesday, Attorney General Luis Carlos Gomez filed a submission in support of the suits and asking the court to find the contract “unconstitutional” for “improperly agreeing to transfer exclusive rights of the Panamanian State.”


Panama Ports Company manages the ports of Cristobal on the canal’s Atlantic side and Balboa on the Pacific side.

The arrangement was renewed in 2021 for 25 years.


The plaintiffs in the case argue that the company benefited from undue tax breaks and other benefits.

The legal challenge came after Trump threatened to take back the canal — built by the United States and handed over to Panama in 1999 — claiming China was effectively “operating” the vital waterway.

Following Trump’s charges, Panama also announced it would audit the Panama Ports Company.

CK Hutchison Holdings is one of Hong Kong’s largest conglomerates, spanning finance, retail, infrastructure, telecoms and logistics.
Trump ends Chevron permit in major blow to Venezuela

REPLACED BY OILSANDS FROM ALBERTA

By AFP
February 26, 2025


A tanker sails near an oil refining plant of state-owned Petroleos de Venezuela (PDVSA) in Puerto La Cruz in November 2021 - Copyright AFP/File Yuri CORTEZ


Shaun Tandon with Javiar Tovar in Caracas


US President Donald Trump said Wednesday he was revoking permission for oil giant Chevron to operate in Venezuela, removing a crucial source of revenue in a wobbly economy run by leftist adversary Nicolas Maduro.

Trump accused Maduro of failing to live up to promises to take back deported Venezuelans as pledged to a US envoy, whose visit to Caracas had initially been seen as a sign the new US administration would focus on pragmatic engagement rather than upping pressure.

Former president Joe Biden in 2022 eased sanctions and gave Chevron permission to operate in Venezuela in return for the release of detained Americans and a promise by Maduro to allow fair elections.

Biden reimposed most sanctions as it became clear that Maduro was sidelining the opposition but maintained the concession to Chevon, in part out of concern of causing a spike in oil prices in the United States before elections.

“We are hereby reversing the concessions that Crooked Joe Biden gave to Nicolas Maduro,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform.

Trump, who rarely faults authoritarian leaders over democracy, said that the election conditions had not been met by Maduro, who was sworn in to a third term last month despite wide accusations of vote rigging.

“Additionally, the regime has not been transporting the violent criminals that they sent into our Country (the Good Ole’ U.S.A.) back to Venezuela at the rapid pace that they had agreed to,” Trump wrote.

Chevron, the only US oil company in Venezuela, had previously stopped production in the country in 2018 due to sanctions by Trump in his first term.

Since its return, it has helped revive an oil sector that has declined precipitously since the 1990s. Chevron pumps around 240,000 barrels a day from Venezuela, or nearly one quarter of the country’s total output.

– Warning on migration –

Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodriguez called the Trump administration’s decision “damaging and inexplicable” and warned of the effect on migration — the key priority for Trump.

“In its attempt to harm the Venezuelan people, it is in fact hurting the United States, its population and its companies, and also calling into question the legal security of the US’s international investment regime,” she wrote on Telegram.

“Venezuela emphasizes that these kinds of failed decisions prompted the migration from 2017 to 2021 with the widely known consequences.”

The Trump administration in its first week of office said it was ready to deport some 600,000 Venezuelans in the United States who had been shielded from removal by Biden under a program for citizens of countries of high risk.

Ric Grenell, a Trump loyalist who serves in a broad role as his envoy for special missions, visited Maduro and demanded that Venezuela take back citizens.

Venezuela soon after sent two planes that brought back nearly 200 undocumented migrants. More than seven million Venezuelans have fled, mostly to other Latin American countries, since the implosion of the economy and political and social turmoil.

Chevron spokesman Bill Turenne said that the company was aware of the decision and “considering its implications.”

“Chevron conducts its business in Venezuela in compliance with all laws and regulations, including the sanctions framework provided by US government,” he said.

Asdrubal Oliveros, director of the analytical firm Ecoanalitica, expected a “major macroeconomic impact” from the decision, particularly on the exchange rate, inflation and ultimately on national growth.

Leonardo Vera, an economic professor at the Central University of Venezuela, said that Chevron’s absence could deprive the country of $150-200 million per month, potentially bringing recession.

But he said that Chevron likely would still operate until September, giving time for diplomacy between the Maduro and Trump administrations.

“Some kind of negotiations could take place in the intervening months so long as the two sides feel they can obtain firm benefits,” he said.

Proposed ‘weather control’ bans surge across US states

CHEMTRAIL CONSPIRACY THEORY


By AFP
February 26, 2025


Residents stand on the grounds of Confluence Baptist Church in a heavily flooded neighborhood on February 18, 2025 in Leslie County, Kentucky. Severe weather events in February claimed the lives of 22 people in the state 
- Copyright GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/AFP Jon Cherry

Manon JACOB

Fake stories that atmospheric experiments are triggering natural disasters have led to US states pushing blanket bans on weather modification, which experts say may jeopardize current local scientific programs and hinder future research.

From recent deadly flooding in Kentucky to the Florida and North Carolina monster hurricanes of 2024, Americans have amplified increasingly conspiratorial explanations for extreme weather events — even blaming manufactured clouds blocking sunlight for the devastation.

In response, lawmakers are moving to criminalize legitimate scientific experiments in the atmosphere.

In Kentucky, Republican John Hodgson told AFP he introduced a bill because his constituents “do not want to allow any government attempts to modify the solar radiation or weather.”

But no such government program played a role in the state’s weather whiplash.

“None of this is government control,” said Shane Holinde, a meteorologist at the Kentucky Climate Center.

“It is all Mother Nature,” he told AFP of the “rollercoaster of a month.”

The severe weather events claimed 23 lives across the state, according to Democratic Governor Andy Beshear.

The actions in Kentucky and other states highlight how misinformation has become entrenched in political discourse, driving legislative efforts in response to conspiracy theories.

Tennessee is the first and only state to have passed such a law, despite witness testimony citing chemtrails — a conspiracy that purports toxic chemicals are being sprayed from aircraft.

Kentucky bill co-sponsor, Republican Steve Rawlings, also alluded to them, telling local media his efforts address constituents’ concerns of “streaks in the skies.”

The efforts reflect general confusion over beneficial, small-scale activities, such as targeted cloud seeding programs in the arid West and large-scale geoengineering projects that are still decades away from possible implementation.

For example, the text targets stratospheric aerosol injection — a futuristic technique that the wider public knows little about.

Scientists hope the method might allow them to shift the total energy balance between the Earth and the Sun and reduce some of the most blatant effects of climate change, including supercharged floods and storms, but it is currently only at a research stage.

The Kentucky legislation mirrors bills advancing in Florida and Arizona since the start of the year.

Edward Parson, environmental law professor at UCLA, said such bills often seek “to prohibit something that is not happening.”

He warned that as more states consider these laws, people will be misled to believe they are “a sensible, legitimate” issue.

– Blanket bans –

As global warming makes weather extremes more likely, each new natural disaster brings further pushback against “weather control” from an increasingly loud crowd, including prominent political figures such as Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene.

Blanket bans also run the risk of hindering projects shown to benefit farmers by managing hyper-local precipitation and reducing crop losses from hail.

“These state legislations feel a little bit like a knee-jerk reaction,” said Deborah Sivas, environmental law professor at Stanford University, while cautioning regulation around larger geoengineering experiments may prove necessary on an international scale.

“There is a bigger conversation to be had about if you can do things to manipulate weather patterns” over the ocean or other large shared areas, she said.

Dana Willbanks of Columbia University’s Climate Science Legal Defense Fund is tracking science-silencing initiatives nationwide.

She pointed to a surge of climate-skeptic discourse and censorship at all levels of government since the start of the second Trump administration, down to city councils and school boards.

“We are going to start seeing more and more outrageous bills” like bans on weather control, she said.

Vietnam jails leading journalist over Facebook posts

COMING SOON TO TUMPLAND


By AFP
February 27, 2025


Image: © AFP/File Chris Delmas

A Vietnamese court on Thursday sentenced a leading independent journalist to 30 months in prison over Facebook posts that criticised the government, state media said.

Huy Duc worked for influential state-run newspapers before authoring one of Vietnam’s most popular blogs and Facebook accounts, where he criticised the country’s communist leaders on issues such as corruption, media control and relations with China.

The court in Hanoi convicted the 63-year-old of “abusing democratic freedoms to infringe upon the interests of the state” through posting 13 articles on Facebook, according to Vietnam News Agency.

The trial lasted just a few hours.

“These articles have a large number of interactions, comments, and shares, causing negative impacts on social order and safety,” the indictment read, according to state media.

Truong Huy San, also known as Huy Duc, a leading independent journalist, has been sentenced to prison for Facebook posts critical of the Vietnamese government – Copyright AFP/File STR

Shortly before his arrest last June, Huy Duc — which is the journalist’s pen name — took aim online at Vietnam’s most powerful leader To Lam, as well as his predecessor Nguyen Phu Trong.

It is unclear if the charges related to these particular posts.

Vietnam, a one-party state, has no free media and clamps down hard on any dissent. It is one of the world’s top jailers of journalists, according to the Reporters Without Borders (RSF) press freedom campaign group.

The trial in Hanoi came just months after blogger Duong Van Thai — who had almost 120,000 followers on YouTube, where he regularly recorded livestreams critical of the government — was jailed for 12 years on charges of publishing anti-state information.

In January, a prominent former lawyer was jailed for three years over Facebook posts.

– ‘Invaluable source of information’ –

Huy Duc, whose real name is Truong Huy San, is a former senior army lieutenant.

He was fired from a state news outlet in 2009 for criticising past actions by Vietnam’s former communist ally, the Soviet Union.

Huy Duc spent a year at Harvard University on a Nieman Fellowship in 2012.

During his time abroad, his account of life in Vietnam after the end of the war with the United States, “The Winning Side”, was published.

RSF said previously that his articles were “an invaluable source of information enabling the Vietnamese public to access censored information by the Hanoi regime”.

Rights campaigners say the government has in recent years stepped up a crackdown on civil society.

“No country can develop sustainably based on fear,” Huy Duc wrote on Facebook in May, the month before he was arrested.

In December, Vietnam enacted new rules requiring Facebook and TikTok to verify user identities and hand over data to authorities.

Under “Decree 147”, all tech giants operating in Vietnam must verify user accounts by phone numbers or Vietnamese identification numbers and store that information alongside their full name and date of birth.