Friday, March 07, 2025

SPACE/COSMOS

After Latest Musk Starship Explosion, 'We Are All in the Debris Field of a SpaceX Mishap'


"Really reassuring that the SpaceX guy is taking over the FAA," one observer quipped.


SpaceX's Starship lifts off from Starbase near Boca Chica, Texas, on March 6, 2025.
(Photo: Ronaldo Schemidt/AFP via Getty Images)

Jake Johnson
Mar 07, 2025
COMMON DREAMS


The eighth test launch of SpaceX's Starship, which billionaire CEO Elon Musk claims will be the spacecraft that eventually transports humans to Mars, ended Thursday in much the same way the seventh did: an explosive failure that sent toxic and polluting debris raining down from the sky.

"We are all in the debris field of a SpaceX mishap," remarked journalist Aaron Rupar after the spacecraft exploded just minutes following its lift-off from a launch site in Texas.

Reutersreported that "several videos on social media showed fiery debris streaking through the dusk skies near south Florida and the Bahamas after Starship broke up in space shortly after it began to spin uncontrollably with its engines cut off."

"The back-to-back mishaps occurred in early mission phases that SpaceX has easily surpassed previously, a setback for a program Musk had sought to speed up this year," the news agency added.

Musk, who is leading SpaceX while simultaneously spearheading a lawless effort to eviscerate the federal government and its workforce, wrote on his social media platform following the Starship explosion that "rockets are hard."

The explosion forced the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)—an agency that Musk and his cronies have infiltrated—to suspend air traffic at several Florida airports, citing "space launch debris."

The New York Timesreported that falling debris from the Starship explosion impacted flights "as far away as Philadelphia International Airport."

Musk, the world's richest man, has been vocal about wanting SpaceX subsidiary Starlink to take over the FAA's air traffic control system.

Following Thursday's explosion and subsequent flight disruptions, New Yorker staff writer Philip Gourevitch wrote sardonically, "Really reassuring that the SpaceX guy is taking over the FAA."



'Too much diversity': Elon Musk ripped as another rocket blows up and grounds flights

Daniel Hampton
March 6, 2025
RAW STORY


SpaceX's next-generation Starship spacecraft atop its Super Heavy booster is launched on its eighth test at the company's Boca Chica launch pad in Brownsville, Texas, U.S., March 6, 2025. REUTERS/Joe Skipper

Internet critics leveled SpaceX CEO Elon Musk after another rocket spectacularly exploded Thursday, this time temporarily halting flights into Miami, Fort Lauderdale, Palm Beach, and Orlando airports over "space launch debris."

SpaceX Starship rocket exploded during its eighth test flight Thursday night. The blast happened shortly after the rocket reached space, with the upper stage experiencing engine failures and tumbling out of control approximately nine minutes into the flight, according to reports.

Witnesses in Florida and the Bahamas shared videos on Musk's X platform of rocket debris falling from the sky. The explosion comes after a similar incident during Starship's seventh test flight in January.

The launch began successfully at 6:30 p.m. from SpaceX's Starbase in southern Texas. The first-stage booster, known as Super Heavy, was successfully caught by the launch tower's "chopstick" arms. But the upper stage encountered problems as it ascended and SpaceX lost contact with the vehicle.

Musk, who has faced increasing criticism over his efforts to slash trillions out of the federal budget, found himself the subject of fierce mockery on social media.

"Clearly there is still too much diversity and inclusion at SpaceX," wrote Helen Kennedy‪, former staffer at the New York Daily News and Boston Herald.

"What isn’t Elon Musk f---ing up these days? My god," chided Emily C. Singer, a staff writer at the Daily Kos.

"Seems inefficient," jabbed YouTuber Sam Seder.


"We are all in the debris field of a SpaceX mishap," wrote independent journalist Aaron Rupar.

Watch a clip of the debris falling from the sky below or at this link.




European rocket aims for first commercial launch after delays


By AFP
March 6, 2025


The last attempted launch of Europe's new heavy-lift Ariane 6 rocket was called off minutes before blast off on Monday - Copyright AFP/File 

Lillian SUWANRUMPHA

After several false starts, Europe’s new rocket Ariane 6 is aiming to finally blast off on its first commercial mission Thursday, carrying with it the continent’s hopes of bolstering its security and independent access to space.

The heavy-lift rocket, which is already years behind schedule, was just 30 minutes away from launching on Monday when a faulty valve meant the mission was postponed for a third time.

The mission carrying a French military satellite comes as Europe seeks to strengthen its defences amid doubts it can still rely on the United States as a security partner under new US President Donald Trump.

A successful launch will also mean that Europe can independently put large satellites into orbit for the first time since Russia pulled its heavy Soyuz rockets after invading Ukraine in 2022.

The launch is now scheduled to blast off from Europe’s spaceport in Kourou, French Guiana at 1:24 pm (1624 GMT) on Thursday.

Monday’s launch was called off at the last minute because of a dysfunctional valve on one of the refuelling pipes, according to the French company Arianespace which operates the rocket.

Tests before the launch showed “abnormal behaviour,” so the only choice was to postpone, Arianespace chief David Cavailloles explained.

The rocket and satellite are “stable and safe,” Arianespace said.

Previous attempts to launch the mission in December and February were also scrubbed.

Postponed launches are common for new rockets. The latest test flight of the world’s biggest rocket, SpaceX’s Starship, is also planning a Thursday launch after a last-minute cancellation on Monday.

– ‘Europe must ensure its own security’ –

Ariane 6 was initially scheduled to have its first fight in 2020, but repeated delays meant the rocket did not blast off for the first time until July last year.

Its first commercial mission is to put the CSO-3 satellite into orbit at an altitude of around 800 kilometres (500 miles) above Earth.

CSO-3 has been waiting since 2022 to complete a network of three French military imaging satellites, with the first two launched in 2018 and 2020 on Soyuz rockets.

Europe has just 10 military satellites — five French and five Italian — compared to “hundreds” for the US and China, French General Philippe Steininger said.

“Europe must ensure its own security,” the European Space Agency’s space transportation director Toni Tolker-Nielsen said in Kourou earlier this week.

He called for the number of annual Ariane 6 launches to increase to 12, compared to the five planned for this year.

Given the military role of the satellite, strict security precautions were taken to limit access at the spaceport on the northern coast of South America, with French fighter jets deployed to patrol the surrounding skies.

The European space industry has struggled to remain competitive with Elon Musk’s SpaceX, which has become increasingly dominant when it comes to launching satellites.

And SpaceX is only expected to become more central to US space efforts with the billionaire Musk becoming a prominent advisor to Trump.

Europe recently found itself without a way to independently launch missions into space due to the Ariane 6 delays, its predecessor Ariane 5 retiring in 2023, Russia pulling its Soyuz rockets and an accident that grounded the smaller Vega-C launcher for two years.

But between Vega-C resuming flights in December and Ariane 6’s first commercial launch, European space efforts are hoping to turn a page on the crisis.

bur-neo-tq-dl/giv


Ghosts of the radio universe’: Astronomers have discovered a slew of faint circular objects


Author provided
Some of the objects captured by ASKAP.

March 04, 2025

Radio astronomers see what the naked eye can’t. As we study the sky with telescopes that record radio signals rather than light, we end up seeing a lot of circles.


The newest generation of radio telescopes – including the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP) and MeerKAT, a telescope in South Africa – is revealing incredibly faint cosmic objects, never before seen.

In astronomy, surface brightness is a measure that tells us how easily visible an object is. The extraordinary sensitivity of MeerKAT and ASKAP is now revealing a new “low surface brightness universe” to radio astronomers. It’s comprised of radio sources so faint they have never been seen before, each with their own unique physical properties.

Many of the ASKAP results presented here were obtained with one of its major observing programs called EMU (Evolutionary Map of the Universe). EMU is mapping the entire southern sky with an unprecedented sensitivity and will deliver the most detailed map of the southern hemisphere sky to date – a spectacular new radio atlas that will be used for decades to come.

EMU’s all-hemisphere coverage paired with ASKAP’s exceptional sensitivity, especially within the Milky Way, is what’s yielded so many recent discoveries.

Here’s what they’re teaching us.

Unstable stars

Kyklos (left) and WR16 (r).Author provided

The ghostly ring Kýklos (from the Greek κύκλος, circle or ring) and the object WR16 both show the environment of rare and unusual celestial objects known as Wolf-Rayet stars.

When big stars are close to running out of fuel, they become unstable as they enter one of the last stages of the stellar life cycle, becoming a Wolf-Rayet star. They begin surging and pulsing, shedding their outer layers which can form bright nebulous structures around the star.

In these objects, a previous outflow of material has cleared the space around the star, allowing the current outburst to expand symmetrically in all directions. This sphere of stellar detritus shows itself as a circle.

Exploded stars

Left to right clocwise: the supernova remnants Stingray 1, Perun, Ancora and Unicycle.  Author provided

Stingray 1, PerunAncora and Unicycle are supernova remnants. When a big star finally runs out of fuel, it can no longer hold back the crush of gravity. The matter falling inwards causes one final explosion, and the remains of these violent star deaths are known as supernovas.

Their expanding shockwaves sweep up material into an expanding sphere, forming beautiful circular features.

The supernova remnant will be deformed by its environment over time. If one side of the explosion slams into an interstellar cloud, we’ll see a squashed shape. So, a near-perfect circle in a messy universe is a special find.

Teleios – named from the Greek Τελεɩοσ (“perfect”) for its near-perfectly circular shape – is shown below. This unique object has never been seen in any wavelength, including visible light, demonstrating ASKAP’s incredible ability to discover new objects.

The shape indicates Teleios has remained relatively untouched by its environment. This presents us with an opportunity to make inferences about the initial supernova explosion, providing rare insight into one of the most energetic events in the universe.


ASKAP EMU radio image of the Teleios supernova remnant.
Author provided

At the other extreme, we can take an object and discover something entirely new about it. The Diprotodon supernova remnant is shown below.

This remnant is one of the largest objects in the sky, appearing approximately six times larger than the Moon. Hence the name: the animal Diprotodon, one of Australia’s most famous megafauna, a giant wombat that lived about 25,000 years ago.

ASKAP’s sensitivity has uncovered the object’s full extent. This discovery led to further analysis, uncovering more of the history and the physics behind this object. The messy internal structure can be seen as different parts of the expanding shell slam into a busy interstellar environment

.
ASKAP radio image of Diprotodon, a supernova remnant. Green circle shows the previous measured size, and the yellow circle shows the new ASKAP measured size. Earth’s Moon size is shown in the top right for scale, and Diprotodon’s namesake is shown in the top left. Author provided

A cosmic mirror

Lagotis is another object that can show how new telescope data can reclassify previously discovered objects. The reflection nebula VdB-80 has been seen before, within the plane of our Milky Way galaxy. The light we see was emitted by nearby stars, and then reflected off a nearby cloud of gas and dust

.
Lagotis, with its cloud of ionised hydrogen or HII region seen on the right.  
Author provided

However, with newly available ASKAP EMU data, we were able to discover an associated cloud of ionised hydrogen (known as an HII region, pronounced “aitch two”), where stellar energy has caused the gaseous matter to lose its electrons.

This HII region is seen to coexist with the reflection nebula, sharing the same stellar centre, and is created from the star pushing into a molecular cloud. This movement is akin to burrowing, so the object earned the name Lagotis after Macrotis lagotis, the Australian greater bilby.
Outside the galaxy

ASKAP and MeerKAT are also illuminating objects from outside our Milky Way galaxy – for example, “radio ring” galaxies. When we use visible light to look at the stars in this galaxy, we see a rather plain disk.

But in radio light, we see a ring. Why is there a hole in the middle? Perhaps the combined force of many exploding supernovas has pushed all the radio-emitting clouds out of the centre. We’re not sure – we’re looking for more examples to test our ideas.

Finally, LMC-ORC is an Odd Radio Circle (ORC), a prominent new class of objects with unfamiliar origins. Only being visible in radio light, they are perhaps the most mysterious of all   

.
A radio ring galaxy (left) and LMC-ORC
 (r).Author provided


The next generation

MeerKAT and ASKAP are revealing incredible insights into the low surface brightness universe. However, they are precursors for the Square Kilometre Array, an international collaborative endeavour that will increase the abilities of radio astronomers and reveal even more unique features of the universe.

The low-surface brightness universe presents many mysteries. These discoveries push our understanding further. Currently, the EMU survey using ASKAP is only 25% complete.

As more of this survey becomes available, we will discover many more unique and exciting objects, both new to astrophysics and extensions on previously known objects.



Acknowledgements: Aaron Bradley and Zachary Smeaton, Masters Research Students at Western Sydney University, made valuable contributions to this article.

Miroslav Filipovic, Professor, Western Sydney UniversityAndrew Hopkins, Professor of Astronomy, Macquarie UniversityLuke Barnes, Senior Lecturer in Physics, Western Sydney University, and Nicholas Tothill, Associate professor, Western Sydney University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.



US firm targets Moon landing with drill, rovers, hopping drone


By  AFP
March 5, 2025


Intuitive Machines' Athena lander in circular orbit around the Moon - Copyright GETTY IMAGES/AFP/File Anna Moneymaker

Issam AHMED

A drill to search for ice. A 4G network test. Three rovers and a first-of-its-kind hopping drone.

After becoming the first private firm to land on the Moon last year, Intuitive Machines is aiming for its second lunar touchdown on Thursday, carrying cutting-edge payloads to support future human missions.

The Houston-based company is targeting no earlier than 12:32 pm ET (1732 GMT) at Mons Mouton, a plateau near the lunar south pole — farther south than any robot has ventured.

NASA will livestream the landing an hour before touchdown as Athena, the 15.6-foot (4.8-meter) hexagonal lander — about the height of a giraffe — begins its descent.

“It kind of feels like this mission is straight out of one of our favorite sci-fi movies,” said Nicky Fox, NASA’s associate administrator for science.

Intuitive Machines’ first landing in February 2024 was a landmark achievement but ended with its lander tipping onto its side, an outcome the company is determined to avoid this time.

The pressure is on after Texas rival Firefly Aerospace successfully landed its Blue Ghost lander on Sunday, becoming the second private company to reach the Moon.

Both missions are part of NASA’s $2.6-billion Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program, which partners with private industry to cut costs and support Artemis, the initiative to return astronauts to the Moon and eventually reach Mars.



– A hopper named Grace –



Athena is targeting highland terrain about 100 miles (160 kilometers) from the Moon’s south pole, where it will deploy three rovers and a unique hopping drone named Grace, after late computer science pioneer Grace Hopper.

One of Grace’s boldest objectives is a hop into a permanently shadowed crater, a place where sunlight has never shone — a first for humanity.

While NASA’s Ingenuity helicopter proved flight is possible on Mars, the Moon’s lack of atmosphere makes traditional flying impossible, positioning hoppers like Grace as a key technology for future exploration.

MAPP, the largest of Athena’s rovers and roughly the size of a beagle, will assist in testing a Nokia Bell Labs 4G cellular network linking the lander, itself, and Grace — technology designed to one day integrate into astronaut spacesuits.

Yaoki, a more compact rover from Japanese company Dymon, is designed to survive drops in any orientation, making it highly adaptable.

Meanwhile, the tiny AstroAnt rover, equipped with magnetic wheels, will cling to MAPP and use its sensors to measure temperature variations on the larger robot.

Also aboard Athena is PRIME-1, a NASA instrument carrying a drill to search for ice and other chemicals beneath the lunar surface, paired with a spectrometer to analyze its findings.



– Sticking the landing –



Before any experiments can begin, Intuitive Machines must stick the landing — a challenge made harder by the Moon’s lack of atmosphere, which rules out parachutes and forces spacecraft to rely on precise thrusts and navigation over hazardous terrain.

Until Intuitive Machines’ first mission, only national space agencies had achieved the feat, with NASA’s last landing dating back to Apollo 17 in 1972.

The company’s first lander, Odysseus, came in too fast, caught a foot on the surface and toppled over, cutting the mission short when its solar panels could not generate enough power.

This time, the company has made critical upgrades, including better cabling for the laser altimeter, which provides altitude and velocity readings to ensure a safe touchdown.

Athena launched last Wednesday aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket, which also carried NASA’s Lunar Trailblazer probe — but not everything has gone smoothly. Ground controllers are struggling to re-establish contact with the small satellite, designed to map the Moon’s water distribution.

These missions come at a delicate time for NASA, amid speculation that the agency may scale back or even cancel the crewed Moon missions in favor of prioritizing Mars — a goal championed by President Donald Trump and his advisor Elon Musk.


Private US spaceship hours from Moon landing attempt


By AFP
March 1, 2025


This still image taken from a February 24, 2025, video released by Firefly Aerospace shows Firefly's Blue Ghost lander on its third lunar orbit near the far side of the Moon and a top-down view of Blue Ghost - Copyright AFP/File ADEK BERRY

Issam AHMED

After a long journey through space, a US company is just hours away from attempting a daring lunar touchdown — its spacecraft poised to become only the second private lander to achieve the feat if it succeeds.

Firefly Aerospace’s Blue Ghost Mission 1 is targeting landing no sooner than 3:34 am US Eastern time (0834 GMT) on Sunday, aiming for a site near Mons Latreille, a volcanic feature in Mare Crisium on the Moon’s northeastern near side.

“Blue Ghost is ready to take the wheel!” the company posted on X on Saturday evening, adding flight controllers had just initiated a key maneuver that lowers a spacecraft’s orbit.

Nicknamed “Ghost Riders in the Sky,” the mission comes just over a year after the first-ever commercial lunar landing and is part of a NASA partnership with industry to cut costs and support Artemis, the program aiming to return astronauts to the Moon.

The golden lander, about the size of a hippopotamus, launched on January 15 on a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket, capturing stunning footage of Earth and the Moon along the way. It shared a ride with a Japanese company’s lander set to attempt a landing in May.

Blue Ghost carries ten instruments, including a lunar soil analyzer, a radiation-tolerant computer and an experiment testing the feasibility of using the existing global satellite navigation system to navigate the Moon.

Designed to operate for a full lunar day (14 Earth days), Blue Ghost is expected to capture high-definition imagery of a total eclipse on March 14, when Earth blocks the Sun from the Moon’s horizon.

On March 16, it will record a lunar sunset, offering insights into how dust levitates above the surface under solar influence — creating the mysterious lunar horizon glow first documented by Apollo astronaut Eugene Cernan.



– Hopping drone –



Blue Ghost’s arrival will be followed on March 6 by Intuitive Machines’ IM-2 mission, featuring its lander Athena.

In February 2024, Intuitive Machines became the first private company to achieve a soft lunar landing — also the first US landing since the crewed Apollo 17 mission of 1972.

However, the success was tempered by a mishap: the lander came down too fast, tipped over on impact, leaving it unable to generate enough solar power and cutting the mission short.

This time, the company says it has made key improvements to the hexagonal-shaped lander, which has a taller, slimmer profile than Blue Ghost, and is around the height of an adult giraffe.

Athena launched on Wednesday aboard a SpaceX rocket, taking a more direct route toward Mons Mouton — the southernmost lunar landing site ever attempted.

Its payloads include three rovers, a drill to search for ice and the star of the show: a first-of-its-kind hopping drone designed to explore the Moon’s rugged terrain.



– NASA’s private Moon fleet –



Landing on the Moon presents unique challenges due to the absence of an atmosphere, making parachutes ineffective.

Instead, spacecraft must rely on precisely controlled thruster burns to slow their descent.

Until Intuitive Machines’ first successful mission, only five national space agencies had accomplished this feat: the Soviet Union, the United States, China, India and Japan, in that order.

Now, the United States is working to make private lunar missions routine through NASA’s $2.6 billion Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program.

The missions come at a delicate moment for NASA, amid speculation that it may scale back or even cancel its Artemis lunar program in favor of prioritizing Mars exploration — a key goal of both President Donald Trump and his close advisor, SpaceX founder Elon Musk.



Trump Team’s Plan to “Make America Great Again” Is to Eviscerate Public Safety

DOGE has put at risk basic government function, dramatically increasing the riskiness of daily life for all Americans.
February 26, 2025

President Trump signs two executive orders and speaks to the press in the Oval Office of the White House on January 30, 2025, in Washington, D.C.Kent Nishimura for The Washington Post via Getty Images

As the so-called “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) continues its rampage through government — so perfectly epitomized by Elon Musk’s ghastly dance with a chainsaw gifted to him by Argentina’s austerity-obsessed President Javier Milei at the Conservative Political Action Conference last week — one basic public safety agency after the next is being compromised.

Anyone concerned about the threat of nuclear weapons can see that firing the personnel of the Nuclear Security Administration, the highly trained crew responsible for maintaining the safety and security of the country’s nuclear weapons stockpile, is a terrible idea. Except the boy-geniuses at DOGE somehow couldn’t work that out, and mistakenly fired the core of the country’s nuclear safety system. Similarly, with bird flu looming as the next great pandemic threat, now seems hardly the time to fire the USDA people responsible for monitoring the spread of the disease — as, again, was done, again allegedly by mistake, during the great culling of government employees.

In both instances, the government set about trying to rehire the experts only to realize that, because the laid-off employees had been instantly locked out of their government email accounts, they were hard to find. Whodathunkit?! While most were subsequently rehired, the episodes should serve as a massive canary in the coal mine warning of the dangers of the ill thought out decimation of government currently underway.

Get our free emails

Email*









At the most basic level, summarily dismissing people with unique expertise in areas of critical public safety leaves a vast hole in the nation’s readiness to prevent, or to deal with, catastrophe. But the dangers go far beyond that: When people with highly specialized skills are treated as badly as those who have been summarily dismissed during the purge have been, when the government welches on paying wages and benefits, when it goes out of its way to humiliate the employees it seeks to dismiss — including by conjuring up nebulous “poor performance” reviews to justify termination — the government is essentially giving these people an incentive to instead sell their expertise to the highest bidder.

The U.S. isn’t a financially bankrupt state in the way that Russia was immediately following the fall of the Soviet Union, but for some unfathomable reason, the Musk-Trump duo is making their decisions about dismantling our government at speed on the premise that it is.

Related Story   

Staffers Resign En Masse From DOGE, Refusing to Help Musk “Dismantle” Services
“We will not lend our expertise to carry out or legitimize DOGE’s actions,” the staffers wrote.  By Sharon Zhang , Truthout  February 25, 2025


In an alarmist mood, one might also fear other parallels with what happened after the Soviet Union imploded in 1991: Huge numbers of highly skilled operatives, experts in bioweapons, in nuclear weapons, and so on, were suddenly left out in the cold by their own government. In the years that followed, many were snapped up by mercenary groups, arms smugglers, and other governments.

And even if it’s unlikely that current U.S. federal workers will go running to support smugglers and other governments, the destruction of large parts of the federal system of government will still have vastly negative impacts. In the best-case scenario, these federal workers will likely move on to the private sector, if they find jobs at all. This potential transfer of skills and resources away from the federal government — and the public good — toward companies motivated entirely by their bottom line should concern us all. What would it mean for information about the spread of disease to end up behind a paywall, to be accessed only by the wealthy? This is the future the Trump administration likely envisions in encouraging federal employees to resign. In fact, its very own FAQ sheet on the “deferred resignation” period openly says: “The way to greater American prosperity is encouraging people to move from lower productivity jobs in the public sector to higher productivity jobs in the private sector.”

This is why, rather than taking the time to carefully audit programs for waste, and to scale back the workforce of bloated programs in the wake of those audits, they have ordered what is essentially a squad of highly skilled young computer hackers into action. Many of these young men have long social media tails of racist, homophobic and sexist comments. They also have no knowledge of how government works. Yet, unfathomably, they have been empowered to go into federal departments, to take over their computer systems, and to then draw up lists of employees who can be summarily fired, all in the name of government efficiency and of dismantling anything remotely connected to diversity, equity and inclusion.

The declared aim is, simply, to reduce the federal workforce by 10 percent — reminiscent of the way Roman generals wielded decimation on their legions, some of whose members had committed crimes such as desertion or mutiny, by randomly killing 1 in 10 of all the soldiers in the unit as a collective punishment, and, presumably, a macabre encouragement to their fellow legionnaires to make sure to root out potential future mutineers or deserters — no matter the cost or collateral damage.

The sheer offense of handing the inner workings of government to Elon Musk and an anonymous group of young computer engineers becomes obvious when one looks at who is being fired.

The Federal Aviation Administration has long been understaffed, and has had several fatal air crashes on its watch in recent weeks, including a mid-air collision in Washington, D.C. Those understaffing problems have now been exacerbated by the decision to fire an additional 400 workers. The union representing them reported that these included aviation safety assistants, maintenance mechanics and some of the people responsible for updating the digital maps used by pilots in flight.

Two hundred Food and Drug Administration workers who monitored the safety of medical devices were laid off — although after a public outcry some were rehired. Meanwhile, so many people from the agency’s food safety division, with expertise on everything from unsafe chemicals in the food supply to the safety of baby formula, have been terminated that the head of that division resigned, saying it was pointless to continue given the lack of staff.

The list goes on and on. Firings have rocked FEMA, NOAA, the Forest Service, which is a vital part of the country’s wildfire-fighting infrastructure, the 9/11 first responder program, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and countless other agencies that help deliver everything from mental health services to school lunches.

If an adversary wanted to devise a way to weaken the United States, I doubt they could have come up with a more effective methodology than that being unleashed on the U.S. by the Trump administration and the DOGE shadow government.

Without any due process, contemptuous of the mechanisms that Congress has set up to regulate hiring and firing within the civil service, and absent public hearings or congressional debate, DOGE has put at risk basic government function. In doing so, it has dramatically increased the riskiness of daily life for all Americans.

In the short-term, Trump and Musk may boast about the chainsaw that they are putting to the so-called Deep State. In the long-term, I suspect most Americans will realize the chainsaw has actually been put to mission-critical functions that keep society chugging along without cascading disasters. But by then it might be too late; the experts will have left government service, many will have gone to private industry or to overseas interests, and ordinary Americans will have been rendered more vulnerable to everything from pandemics to malfunctioning medical devices to unsafe food to nuclear accidents.

Pardon my obtuseness here, but from where I’m standing, that comes off as quite a bizarre way to make “America Great Again.”


This article is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), and you are free to share and republish under the terms of the license.


Sasha Abramsky is a freelance journalist and a part-time lecturer at the University of California at Davis. His work has appeared in numerous publications, including The Nation, The Atlantic Monthly, New York Magazine, The Village Voice and Rolling Stone. He also writes a weekly political column. Originally from England, with a bachelor’s in politics, philosophy and economics from Oxford University and a master’s degree from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism, he now lives in Sacramento, California.
'Negative world': How an evangelical theory became Christian fundamentalism’s 'dominant framework'


Aaron Renn with Josh McManus, Paulette Brown-Hinds, and Chaya Nayak in 2019 (Wikimedia Commons)
March 07, 2025
ALTERNET

When Donald Trump declared, "I am your retribution" during his 2024 campaign, his far-right white evangelicals supporters were quite receptive to that message. Many white Christian nationalists view themselves as a persecuted minority, and Trump is promising to defend them.

Trump's predecessor in the White House, former President Joe Biden, is known for being a devout Catholic — and Biden isn't shy about discussing his faith. But Trump and his Christian nationalist allies often claimed that Biden's presidency was hostile to Christianity.

The New York Times' Ruth Graham, in an article published on March 7, explains how a term by evangelical activist Aaron Renn is giving a voice to the sense of persecution that many right-wing evangelicals have.

Renn's term is "negative world," which, in his view, means a country that is hostile to Christianity. And that messaging, Graham emphasizes, has really caught on among fundamentalist Protestant evangelicals.

"On the Christian Right…. a thesis is emerging: If conservative Christians are no longer a 'moral majority,' but a moral minority, they must shift tactics," Graham explains. "They ought to be less concerned with persuading the rest of the country they are relevant and can fit perfectly well in secular spaces. They don't."


Graham continues, "Instead, they must consider abandoning mainstream institutions like public schools and build their own alternatives. They must pursue ownership of businesses and real estate. And they must stop triangulating away from difficult teachings on matters like sexuality and gender differences. Resilience over relevance."

Renn's "negative world" theory, according to Graham, "is now the dominant framework for many people trying to understand their place in contemporary America."

READ MORE: Author details link between 'Christian nationalism' and MAGA’s 'smashing of the administrative state'

"The idea has inspired conferences, sermons, and countless response essays and blog posts," Graham observes. "A reviewer in Christianity Today called it 'among the most thought-provoking ideas pertaining to American evangelicalism this century.'"

Graham adds, "'Negative world' has turned Mr. Renn into a kind of Malcolm Gladwell of conservative Christianity, a skilled taxonomist known for distilling and naming a phenomenon that many were feeling but none had articulated."

READ MORE: Apocalypse Now: Extreme interpretation of Christian nationalism now guides Pentagon policy

Read Ruth Graham's full article for the New York Times at this link (subscription required).
'I almost choked': Economist highlights gobsmacking moment of Trump’s speech


Paul Krugman // The Oxford Union via YouTube
March 05, 2025


Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman found himself particularly floored by a moment in President Donald Trump's address to Congress on Tuesday in which he made boasts about boosting auto manufacturing even as his tariffs on Canada and Mexico threaten to cripple auto supply chains.

Writing on his Substack page, Krugman explained how car production in the United States will be hampered by the tariffs on America's two biggest trading partners given the way that cars are assembled across all three countries.

"Automobile production, which is deeply integrated across our northern and southern borders — there really isn’t a U.S. auto industry, there’s a North American industry operating in all three countries — will be especially hard hit," he wrote. "I almost choked when Trump declared last night that 'we are going to have growth in the auto industry like nobody has ever seen.' Well, I guess we’ve never seen a large downturn in auto production outside a major recession, which is not to say that we won’t get a recession too."

Taking stock of Trump's economic policies as a whole, including Tesla CEO Elon Musk's slash-and-burn approach to federal workers, Krugman argued that the United States right now is "trapped in a burning Tesla."

"If you don’t know this, the doors on Musk’s cars are designed to open electronically; if they have manual releases at all, they’re difficult to get at and use," he explained. "As a result, there have been multiple instances of people burning alive inside Teslas when the engines catch fire. Well, large parts of the U.S. economy and government appear to be on the verge of self-immolation. And given the combination of arrogance and ignorance shared by Musk and Trump, it’s hard to see how we get out."


'If it's a trade war Trump wants ...': Top economist would target admin's 'Achilles heel'


SHAWN THEW/Pool via REUTERS
(L-R) Priscilla Chan, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Lauren Sanchez, businessman Jeff Bezos, Sundar Pichai, and businessman Elon Musk, among other dignitaries, attend Donald Trump's inauguration as the next President of the United States.

March 03, 2025

As U.S. President Donald Trump weighed 25% tariffs he plans to impose on Canada and Mexico on Monday, with the White House sending mixed messages in recent days about when the levies will go into effect, a top progressive economist has proposed foreign countries should respond to "the trade war Trump seems determined to stoke" by targeting the "Achilles heel" embedded in the Trump administration.

"Mexico, Canada, and Europe have leverage," wrote Gabriel Zucman, director of the E.U. Tax Observatory, in a column Friday, pointing to the country's "highly internationalized oligarchy: a small group of ultra-wealthy individuals whose fortunes depend on access to global markets."

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick indicated Monday morning that Trump has yet to decide whether tariffs on Canadian and Mexican imports—including produce, lumber, vehicles, and electronics—will go forward just after midnight on Tuesday as previously planned; the president has also recently said the tariffs could be delayed until April 2.

But Zucman wrote that whenever the policy does enter force, Canada, Mexico, and any other countries affected "should retaliate by taxing U.S. oligarchs."

Powerful business owners like Tesla CEO Elon Musk—now also spearheading Trump's gutting of federal agencies through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)—Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg all rely on markets outside of the U.S. to enrich their companies, which "gives foreign governments influence," Zucman continued.

"If Tesla wants to sell cars in Canada and Mexico, Elon Musk—Tesla's primary shareholder—should be required to pay taxes in those jurisdictions," he wrote. "Of course, this strategy is explicitly extraterritorial, since it applies tax obligations on foreign actors in exchange for access to local markets. But rather than fearing extraterritoriality, countries should embrace it as a tool for enforcing minimum standards, curbing inequality, preventing tax evasion, and promoting sustainability."

Tariffs on oligarchs could fight against Trump's attacks on environmental regulations, push for tax giveaways to billionaires at the cost of crucial public services, and advocacy for re-segregating workplaces, suggested Zucman, while shifting "the economic conflict from a battle between countries—which fuels nationalist tensions and economic retaliation—to one between consumers and oligarchs."

Countries could also "collect taxes that multinationals have dodged elsewhere, gradually eroding the appeal of tax competition" and triggering a "virtuous cycle," added the economist, who focuses on wealth inequality and international tax policy.

With tariffs on oligarchs in place, he said, firms would no longer be incentivized to move to countries that hand out corporate tax breaks because their savings would be offset by the tariffs levied by countries with large markets.

Governments have been accused in taking part in a "race to the bottom" as they try to attract large multinational companies run by some of the richest people in the world, with huge tax breaks that weaken "national safety nets, [kill] jobs by subsidising capital at the expense of labor, [allow] elites to escape the rule of law, and [reduce] productivity and economic growth," as the Tax Justice Network wrote in a 2020 report.

With tariffs for oligarchs, said Zucman "the race to the bottom would soon be replaced by a race to the top."

While the first weeks of Trump's second term in the White House have raised fears over a looming trade war, attacks on immigrants and transgender Americans, mass firings of federal workers, and the United States' withdrawal from international agreements and organizations, Zucman said the Trump presidency "also presents an opportunity."

"This is a moment to rethink international economic relations, calmly but radically," wrote Zucman. "The best response is a new global economic framework that neutralizes tax competition, fights inequality, and protects our planet. Under such a framework, importing countries would enforce tax justice beyond their borders, ensuring that multinational corporations and their billionaire owners pay their fair share."

"If it's a trade war Trump wants," he said, "consumers in Mexico, Canada, Europe, and beyond should unite to ensure that Musk and his fellow oligarchs feel the cost."
Tribal leaders sound alarm as Trump’s federal cuts threaten Indigenous communities


Photo by Joshua Earle on Unsplash

March 04, 2025

From securing funding for Indian Health Services and ongoing water settlements to increasing investments in infrastructure, education and law enforcement, many Indigenous leaders and organizations are raising the alarm about the devastation that federal funding cuts could bring for Native Americans.

More than 60 tribal leaders and organizations from across Indian Country testified over three days to a U.S. House of Representatives Appropriations subcommittee on the federal funding needs of Indigenous people and their communities nationwide.

“I know there’s never enough funding to go around,” Gila River Indian Community Gov. Stephen Roe Lewis said, and he appreciates how the subcommittee has consistently set aside several days to hear Indian Country’s funding priorities.

“It is the process that starts the funding decisions for tribal programs, staffing and priorities for this administration,” he added. Tribal leaders and organizations gave five-minute testimonies to the subcommittee from Feb. 25 to Feb. 27.

Lewis used his five minutes to discuss the Trump administration’s actions and their impact on his community.

There is “real fear” within tribal communities about what is happening in Washington, D.C., he said, referencing the freezing of federal funding and the mass firing of federal employees across the government.

Lewis said that many may applaud the slashing of federal funding because they have been convinced it is fraught with waste and abuse, or even those who see federal employees as a new enemy.

“I doubt you will hear a tribal leader argue that the federal government can’t be made more efficient or that there aren’t places where cuts could be made,” he said. “After all, we have been dealing with the federal government longer than any other group in this country.”

However, Lewis said the “chainsaw approach” of indiscriminately cutting employees, taken by President Donald Trump and billionaire businessman Elon Musk, who has been directing the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, will not create efficiencies or save billions of dollars.


He added that the cuts are being made without considering how they will impact services. Rather than making the government more efficient and effective, it is “creating a federal workforce that is paralyzed by fear.”

Lewis called the administration’s actions destabilizing and said they will have a disproportionate impact on Indian Country.

“The government-to-government relationship is only as strong as our federal partner,” he said. “And right now, there is a real concern that the federal side of this partnership has the real potential of being dismantled.”

Lewis said that reforms can be and should be made. But, he said, they should be made in a way that provides insight, dignity and consultation with tribal governments and among those with the experience and knowledge of tribal programs.


“It is up to this committee to make those decisions,” he said, ensuring certainty among Indigenous peoples that the essential programs they depend on won’t be cut.

“Certainty that our tribal sovereignty will be upheld and honored,” he added.
‘Treaty and trust obligations’

Multiple tribal leaders and organizations urged the subcommittee to help them hold the administration accountable for the federal funding allocated to Indigenous peoples and their communities.


“Tribal programs are not DEI initiatives,” Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community President Martin Harvier said, referring to the Trump administration’s efforts to eliminate all diversity, equity and inclusion programs in the federal government. “They are a fulfillment of treaty and trust obligations and must not be subject to arbitrary reductions or freezes.”

During the three-day subcommittee hearing, tribal leaders and organizations emphasized their communities’ various needs, highlighting issues ranging from insufficient law enforcement to the necessity of sustainable roads on tribal land to the importance of urban Native programs.

“Indian Country continues to struggle with generations of crumbling infrastructure, limited access to health care, underfunded law enforcement and an ongoing fight for clean water,” Navajo Nation President Buu Nygren said. “These issues aren’t just numbers in a budget.”

Nygren said it is the everyday realities of Navajo and Native families throughout Indian Country. As an example, he told the subcommittee about the Navajo Nation’s dire need for emergency medical services support, highlighting how people needing an ambulance often wait 45 minutes or longer.


“If an ambulance is even available,” he added, noting that Navajo EMS answers roughly 20,000 calls a year and their funding has not been increased in decades.

“This is a matter of life and death,” he said. “We ask for dedicated funding for our tribal EMS, including a $4 million allocation specifically for the Navajo Nation.”

Funding needs for public safety were a big concern for many tribal leaders, including the San Carlos Apache Tribe.

San Carlos Apache Chairman Terry Rambler shared that the San Carlos Apache Police Department has only 19 officers and would need at least 75 to adequately patrol their large tribal land area.

Rambler said San Carlos Apache police officers work 12-hour shifts, patrol over 360,000 miles per year and endure extreme situations made worse by the lack of an adequate facility.

“Our police department is severely underfunded and public safety is severely compromised,” he said. “Our police department cannot compete with other places that offer higher salaries and better benefits. Other jurisdictions actively recruit away our officers.”

During the hearing, Subcommittee Chairman Mike Simpson, a Republican from Idaho, acknowledged the importance of keeping police officers and firefighters in Indigenous communities rather than allowing the community to serve merely as a training ground for them to move on to areas with better pay and benefits.

“Those are important issues we’ve got to work on,” he said.

Tohono O’odham Vice Chairwoman Carla Johnson shared with the subcommittee that there are over 700 miles of Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) roads on her reservation, and they are all in poor condition.

“The BIA road maintenance program has been underfunded for years and has a huge backlog,” she said. “Only 13% of BIA roads nationwide are in acceptable condition.”

Johnson said that more funding must be provided for the BIA roads program because the roads within their community are how tribal citizens access essential services, how federal and tribal law enforcement engage in border security, and how EMS responds.

“This funding is critical for the safety of tribal members, law enforcement, emergency responders and all others using our reservation road,” she added.

The needs of Indigenous peoples do not stop at the boundaries of their tribal lands, and Urban Indian Health Institute Director Abigail Echo-Hawk used her testimony to remind the subcommittee that Indigenous peoples in urban areas deserve the same type of support.

Echo-Hawk said that about 76% of Native American people live off their tribal homelands and reside in urban areas.

“We need to remember the urban Indian population,” she said. “The treaty and trust responsibility for our health and wellness did not end when we stepped off the reservation.”

Echo-Hawk called on the subcommittee to support funding for the Indian Health Services and Urban Native Health Programs, essential resources and services for many Indigenous people.

“What I am asking you is to fight back with us,” she said. “Fight back to ensure that we have the resources and services as an Urban program to get the treatment for those coming to us.”
Senators and representatives call on administration

Amid growing concerns about implementing the Trump administration’s executive order on government workforce efficiency, over 100 Democratic U.S. senators and representatives signed a letter to Trump, Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum and U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., reminding them to uphold the federal government’s commitments to tribal nations.

The congresspeople noted that the U.S. government has trust and treaty responsibilities to tribal nations, which are implemented through various agencies to provide tribes with vital health care, education and social services.

“Your administration’s recent executive actions undermine legally required commitments to sovereign tribal nations, existing federal law, and the federal-Tribal government-to-government relationship,” they wrote in the letter.

The letter was headed by Rep. Melanie Stansbury and Sen. Martin Heinrich, Democrats from New Mexico. In total, 113 elected officials signed the letter from the Senate and Congress, including all of the Democratic members of Arizona’s delegation.

A spokesperson for Arizona Sen. Ruben Gallego said he joined his colleagues in urging the Trump administration to protect resources in Indian Country and fulfill the federal government’s promises because he is committed to standing up for Native communities in Arizona.

“The recent funding freezes and mass firings within agencies like the Bureau of Indian Affairs and Indian Health Services only jeopardize essential services and create chaos,” the spokesperson said in a statement emailed to the Arizona Mirror.

The letter focuses on the administration’s executive order “Implementing the President’s Department of Government Efficiency Workforce Optimiation Initiative” and its impact on Indian Country.

The congresspeople indicate that the administration has abruptly fired thousands of federal workers across various government agencies. They have received reports of more than 2,600 at the Department of the Interior, over 100 at the Bureau of Indian Affairs, more than 40 at the Bureau of Indian Education and approximately 950 Indian Health Service employees.

“Beyond the legal questions surrounding the ability to fire employees without specifying performance or conduct issues, any unilateral attempts to disrupt existing services administered or funded by the BIA, BIE, IHS, or Tribal-serving entities would directly violate the trust and treaty obligations of the United States to Tribal Nations,” the letter states.

The leaders urged the administration to take immediate action to “halt, exempt, and reverse” any federal offices, services, or funding that serve Indian Country from existing or future executive actions.

“Tribal Nations are sovereign governments with a unique legal and political relationship to the United States,” the letter states. “These trust and treaty obligations in some cases predate both the establishment of all of the agencies in question as well as the United States itself.”


Arizona Mirror is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Arizona Mirror maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jim Small for questions: info@azmirror.com
New bill would let voters donate to anti-abortion centers instead of paying any taxes


Photo by Alexander Grey on Unsplash

Jeremy Kohler
March 06, 2025

In an unprecedented move to funnel more public tax dollars toward groups that oppose abortion, Republican lawmakers in Missouri are advancing a plan to allow residents to donate to pregnancy resource centers instead of paying any state income taxes.

The proposal would establish a 100% tax credit, up from 70%, and a $50,000 annual cap per taxpayer. The result: Nearly all Missouri households — except those with the highest incomes — could fully satisfy their state tax bill by redirecting their payment from the state to pregnancy centers.

The move comes four months after Missouri voters reversed one of the nation’s strictest abortion bans, and just as clinics have begun performing the procedure again after overcoming Republican obstacles.

Supporters of the bill, which last month cleared a key legislative hurdle in the state House, say it gives taxpayers more control over where their tax dollars go and allows them to support organizations that help pregnant women and provide alternatives to abortion. Alissa Gross, CEO of Resource Health Services, which runs four pregnancy resource centers in the Kansas City area, told the committee in written testimony that tax credits have led to a surge in donations to her organization and that a 100% tax credit could bring in even more.

“Our ability to impact more men and women for life as well as build healthy families has been substantial,” she said.

Critics argue the state’s support for pregnancy resource centers, also known as crisis pregnancy centers, diverts tax revenue away from essential services such as health care and public education and becomes a funding stream for anti-abortion advocacy. They say many centers do little to actually help women; instead, they say they merely discourage women from getting abortions.

“A 70 percent tax credit with no cap was excessive. A 100 percent tax credit is absurd,” Katie Baylie, a lawyer and reproductive rights advocate based in the Kansas City area, wrote in testimony submitted to the committee. “It is an insult to Missourians that our lawmakers are spending time even considering this bill.”

Experts in tax policy and philanthropy said a dollar-for-dollar tax credit — for any purpose — is rare and could be much costlier for the state than intended, especially if pregnancy centers actively promote it.

There is a big psychological difference for donors between a 100% tax credit and a 70% credit, the experts said. At 70%, donors still have to pay some taxes, but at 100%, there is no reason to make a donation less than their tax liability.

“I could imagine a possibility where there’s a big publicity campaign by these centers, or a viral campaign, and massive numbers of conservative Missourians decide to effectively defund state government in favor of these pregnancy resource centers,” said David Gamage, a professor of tax law and policy at the University of Missouri law school.

However, expansion of tax credits clashes with another Republican push to eliminate Missouri’s income tax altogether. Two proposals to replace it with a higher sales tax recently advanced in the state Senate, although it was unclear whether they could pass. If Missouri were to abolish state income taxes, tax credits would become meaningless.

The bill represents one more expansion of a measure Missouri lawmakers have been growing for several years. Until 2021, Missouri taxpayers who donated to pregnancy resource centers were able to claim a 50% tax credit for their donations, meaning for every $1,000 in donations, a taxpayer’s bill dropped by $500. That’s when an expansion approved by the legislature in 2019 took effect and raised the rate to 70%. That shifted more of the cost of those contributions to the state, since tax credits work by directly reducing the amount of money a taxpayer owes to the state. Unlike deductions, which lower taxable income, tax credits are a dollar-for-dollar reduction in tax liability. When these credits are redeemed, they prevent the state from collecting that revenue, effectively reducing the total income available for public services.

The legislature also removed a $3.5 million-per-year cap on the program and removed its expiration date.

At the time, the change drew little attention because it was tucked into the same legislation that created Missouri’s trigger law to ban abortion if Roe v. Wade were overturned — a move that dominated headlines. And there were few warnings about how much it could cost.

The bill’s official cost estimate, prepared by nonpartisan legislative oversight staff, projected only a modest increase in taxpayer expense. Raising the tax credit to 70% was expected to increase annual tax credits from $3.5 million to $4.9 million. That estimate assumed donations would remain steady.

But they didn’t. The program has grown significantly, with $11.8 million in tax credits authorized in the past year alone. Still, it remains a small fraction of Missouri’s overall budget; Gov. Mike Kehoe has proposed a $54 billion spending plan for next year.

Once again, legislative research is downplaying the potential impact on Missouri’s budget. The fiscal note for the bill accounts only for the jump from a 70% to a 100% tax credit, without considering the likely surge in donations that such an incentive would trigger — even though increasing giving is the entire point of the policy.

The note says that it was “unclear” whether the enhanced tax credit would encourage more people to contribute and claim the credit, which would lead to more foregone tax revenue for the state.

The legislative research staffer who authored the impact statement declined to comment, and the bill’s House sponsor, Rep. Christopher Warwick, did not respond to questions from ProPublica.

Warwick, a Republican from Bolivar, in southwest Missouri, told the tax reform committee that his proposal empowers taxpayers to support important work without the state “trying to verify what programs work.” He said, too, that he would oppose requirements for pregnancy resource centers to report how they spend the money, saying he wanted to “limit the bureaucracy.”

Warwick’s bill would also increase the tax credit for donations to maternity homes from 70% to 100% and for diaper banks from 50% to 100%. The state has not yet studied the impact of those changes.

A matching bill has been introduced in the Senate but has not yet advanced.

Rep. Steve Butz, a Democrat from St. Louis, argued the tax credit would effectively shift charitable giving from individuals to the state.

“This will be the fourth bill I’ve heard that will reduce revenue, which I guess is clearly your goal here — to reduce the revenue to the state,” Butz told Warwick during a legislative hearing on the bill. He argued that if donors receive a full tax credit for their contributions, they aren’t really giving their own money — rather, the state is effectively making the donation for them. “So I don’t know that I’d consider that much charitable giving.”

In an interview, Butz said he considers himself pro-life and has donated to pregnancy resource centers, receiving the 70% tax credit. However, he said he does not believe the program should take priority over others that receive less or no tax incentives for giving.

Missouri’s approach to crisis pregnancy centers reflects a growing divide between red and blue states. While Republican-led states such as Florida, Texas and Tennessee have ramped up funding for pregnancy resource centers, states led by Democrats, including Massachusetts and California, have warned residents the centers mislead patients by posing as medical clinics while steering them away from abortion.

Missouri is among the national leaders in per capita spending on pregnancy resource centers even before tax credits are factored in, according to data from states that fund them. Kehoe has proposed increasing direct state funding by almost 50% to more than $12 million in the fiscal year that starts July 1.

In a statement, Gabby Picard, communications director in Kehoe’s office, said the governor “is committed to supporting services that help women choose to carry their unborn child to term, which is why his budget recommends increased funding” for abortion alternatives, including pregnancy resource centers.

Missouri was the first state to use tax credits to fund pregnancy centers, becoming a model for other states looking to support the anti-abortion movement. One public health expert who has tracked the impact of pregnancy centers said Missouri has been a leader and innovator in this effort. “What Missouri is proposing really makes them an outlier at the top of the game,” said Andrea Swartzendruber, an associate professor of epidemiology and biostatistics at the University of Georgia.

Warwick’s initiative follows sweeping changes to Missouri’s abortion laws.

In November, voters approved a constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right to abortion and other reproductive health decisions, effectively nullifying a near-total ban that had been in place since 2022, when the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

The first abortion performed under the new amendment took place in Kansas City on Feb. 15, after a judge struck down restrictive licensing rules that had prevented providers like Planned Parenthood from resuming services in the state.

In response, Republican lawmakers have introduced a wave of bills aimed at limiting the amendment’s impact. Among the measures is another proposed constitutional amendment that would restrict abortion and ban gender-affirming care for minors — an effort to combine something that voters support with something they don’t in the hopes it’ll turn off abortion-rights supporters.

Some abortion-rights advocates in the legislature see the expanded tax credit as part of a broader push by anti-abortion lawmakers stung by the repeal of the abortion ban. After the amendment passed, those legislators “needed some wins,” said Rep. Kemp Strickler, a Democrat from the Kansas City suburbs.

“But even if the amendment had lost,” Strickler said, “they probably would have been coming forward with these kinds of things.”
Trump tariffs a 'direct attack' on Nevada as imported produce, seafood and liquor targeted

CANADIAN TOURISTS


March 06, 2025

Nevada’s golden goose – the hospitality industry – could get cooked as a result of President Donald Trump’s protectionist trade policies, some experts fear. On Tuesday, Trump imposed 25% tariffs on goods imported from its two top trade partners – Canada and Mexico. An additional 10% levy on imports from China went into effect last month, on top of existing tariffs.

“I am gravely concerned that our tourism workers will face layoffs from the Trump tariffs,” Rep. Dina Titus, a Democrat from Southern Nevada, said Wednesday.

Federal tax revenue is projected to increase by $142 billion as a result of the tariffs on imported goods, amounting to an average increased cost of $1,072 per U.S. household, according to the Tax Foundation.

The policy is at odds with Trump’s promise, as a candidate and after taking office in his second term, to lower costs for inflation-weary Americans.

The tariffs will have an “immediate impact on the cost of imported household items, groceries, and essentials critical for Nevada families,” Bryan Wachter of the Nevada Retail Association said in a statement Tuesday that urged the Trump administration and trade partners to find alternative solutions without burdening families and businesses.

The “little disturbance” to the economy forecasted by Trump on Tuesday could render a Las Vegas vacation out of reach for tourists, and slash disposable income for residents, many of whom earn their living in hotels, restaurants, and retail establishments.

“The Trump tariffs will lead to an international economic slowdown,” said Titus. “Las Vegas knows well that when there is a downturn, we are the first to feel the impacts and the last to recover, and if prices are higher in the United States, as anticipated, people will not have money in their pocket to go on holiday.”

More than half of international visitation to Southern Nevada, still on the mend from the pandemic, comes from Canada and Mexico.

The president alleges the countries have not done enough to curb the flow of fentanyl across the borders.

In Fiscal Year 2024, U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents seized 43 pounds of fentanyl at the Canadian border, and have seized 10 pounds so far this fiscal year. By contrast, authorities seized 21,000 pounds at the southern border in FY 24, and 5,400 pounds in the current fiscal year.

“Trump’s Tariffs are a direct attack on the workers who power Nevada’s economy: Hospitality workers, construction workers, and agricultural workers,” Culinary Local 226 Secretary-Treasurer Ted Pappageorge said in a news release Tuesday. “Closing the border, deporting 11 million undocumented workers who help power the greatest economy in the world, and enacting reckless tariffs will blow up our economy and push us into a recession.”


Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau called Trump’s actions a “very dumb move,” and accused the president of plotting “a total collapse of the Canadian economy because that will make it easier to annex us,” the BBC reported Tuesday. “That is never going to happen. We will never be the 51st state.”

More than 40% of U.S. imports come from Mexico, Canada, and China according to Census data. Nevadans buy more than $3 billion in goods from Mexico and Canada annually, says a news release from U.S. Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, a Democrat.

“President Trump says he is standing up for American families and workers, but these tariffs on our allies will raise prices and cost the U.S. as many as 400,000 blue-collar jobs,” Cortez Masto said in a statement. “Make no mistake, President Trump’s actions are going to jack up the cost of groceries, medicine, and new cars, and could make buying a new home more than $20,000 more expensive, all to pay for tax cuts for his wealthy friends.”

Axios estimates an effective increase of 153% in Nevada for the cost of imported goods, compared with existing tariffs, and an annual economic impact to the state of $985 million, about .5% of the state’s gross domestic product.


Gov. Joe Lombardo did not respond to requests for comment on the potential impact of Trump’s tariffs.
A menu in flux

American diners are coming to terms with higher food prices, says Nevada Restaurant Association Government Affairs and Communications Manager Peter Saba, who suggests eateries can minimize the impact of tariffs by tweaking their menus, substitute ingredients if necessary, or maybe add a small surcharge rather than increase prices across the board.

In 2023, Mexico supplied 63% of vegetable imports and 47% of fruit and nuts to the U.S.


“In Nevada, we rely on a substantial portion of produce, seafood, and alcoholic beverages from Mexico and Canada. Those will be some of the first things that get hit,” Saba says, adding that domestic sourcing is often not a realistic option. “Certain ingredients aren’t in season year round as it is, even in some of these other places we import from.”

A greater concern than increasing prices, he says, is the prospect that “people will just stay away. A lot more people are already not eating out because of inflation. With tariffs on top of that, I think we’re most worried they just won’t come.”

Paul Lagudi of Lagudi Fresh Food Group, a full service food company serving resorts in Las Vegas and nationwide, says he doesn’t anticipate a slow down in tourism, or increase in the cost of produce to his clients.

“We might have to buy produce from different regions instead of Mexico and Canada,” Lagudi says, adding that switching sources doesn’t mean higher prices. “Not at all. We pull out of Guatemala and Costa Rica every day.”


The produce business, he says, is “all about supply and demand. You can put on any tariff you want. At the end of the day, If nobody’s buying the product, you ain’t selling the product. You know what happens? They start dropping their prices. They’re going to start calling up and saying, ‘Listen, can you help me out? Instead of paying $20 or $30, can you take it for $10?’ That’s when we’ll come in and buy it.”

As of Tuesday, the price of watermelon from Mexico was already headed toward a 25% price increase.

“I said ‘keep your watermelon. I’ll pull from Costa Rica, and I’ll pay $100 a bin less,” Lagudi said.
A change in plans?

The Nevada Resort Association says it’s too soon to determine the potential impacts of Trump’s tariffs on the casino industry, but is “closely monitoring” developments.

Tourists from Canada and Mexico have topped international visitation to Southern Nevada every year since 2010, with 30% of tourists originating from Canada and 22% from Mexico in 2023.




In 2023, visitation to Southern Nevada from the two countries reached 2.4 million – a rebound following a post-COVID slump, but far below the 2014 peak of 2.99 million.

Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority chief Steve Hill did not respond to requests for comment on whether the tariffs are likely to pose a setback in efforts to lure international visitors.

Travel Nevada, the state’s tourism office, said it may be too early to determine the effects of the tariffs.

“Now is also the time to choose Canada,” Trudeau, annoyed by Trump’s threats to annex Canada and impose tariffs, said in a speech this month. “It might mean changing your summer vacation plans to stay here in Canada and explore the many national and provincial parks, historical sites and tourist destinations our great country has to offer.”

“People are cancelling trips to Las Vegas, Hawaii and Florida. They don’t feel welcome in America,” says British Columbia resident Rhonda Porter, who has been visiting Las Vegas since she was a child. She says Canadians are irked not only by Trump’s trade war, but also by his desire to turn Canada into a state.

“We’ve gotten rid of all of our liquor from the red states,” said Porter. “No Kentucky bourbon.”

The Liquor Control Board of Ontario ordered U.S. products removed from shelves in its retail stores, the Louisville Courier-Journal reported.

Canadian tourists spent $20.5 billion in the U.S. last year, the New York Times reports.

“The top 5 most visited states by Canadians—Florida, California, Nevada, New York and Texas—could see declines in retail and hospitality revenue, as shopping is the top leisure activity for Canadian visitors,” says the U.S. Travel Association.

“If we raise prices on Canadians and Mexicans, the first thing they will cut is travel,” Titus said. ”That will have serious effects on our economy. Last year, seven of the top eight foreign markets for air travel to Las Vegas were in Canada and Mexico.”

Gas prices are also expected to increase because of tariffs on Canadian oil, Titus said. “And housing prices will skyrocket as construction materials get more expensive.”

On Wednesday, the White House delayed the imposition of tariffs on imports for U.S. car manufacturers for one month; deemed Canada’s efforts to meet Trump’s border security demands as “not good enough,”; and doubled down on the president’s warning that beginning April 2, the U.S. will impose reciprocal tariffs on all countries that place tariffs on U.S. products.

Nevada Current is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Nevada Current maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Hugh Jackson for questions: info@nevadacurrent.com.
Prices are 'going to rise' and 'robots' will be doing factory jobs: Trump Cabinet official



U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick walks through Statuary Hall prior to U.S. President Donald Trump's speech to a joint session of Congress at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., U.S., March 4, 2025. REUTERS/Brian Snyder

March 06, 2025
ALTERNET

One of the chief economic officials in President Donald Trump's administration recently admitted that prices for imported goods subjected to Trump's tariffs will indeed go up, and that the administration is in support of automating more factory jobs.

During a Thursday interview with CNBC host David Faber, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was noticeably up-front when asked whether consumers would see higher sticker prices on store shelves. Faber asked Lutnick if prices will have to "eventually rise" if corporations move production back to the United States so companies can remain "competitive globally." Walmart, for example, imports roughly 70% of its non-food inventory from China.

"I think if you want to buy things from other countries, and you want to bring it into America, then the price is going to rise," Lutnick said. "But if you make it here, then of course the price won't rise! So make it here! Make. It. Here. How hard is that to say? You know, just keep repeating it to yourself: There's no tariff if you make it here."

"You're going to watch everyone come to that realization," he continued. "Apple builds it all in China. Why are they building it all in China and giving us our iPhone? Why don't they make it here?"

At that point, multiple voices cut in to remind Lutnick that it was "cheaper" for Apple to manufacture its products in China.

"Mr. Secretary, wages are lower over there!" CNBC correspondent Carl Quintanilla said.

"And now, there are robots who can do it!" Lutnick said after a brief pause. "You are going to see robotic production of iPhones, and the jobs that are going to be created. People who build those factories, the mechanics who work on those robots ... This is the re-creation of tradecraft in the United States of America."

Watch the full exchange below, or by clicking this link.