Monday, November 10, 2025

 

Beauty and fear



The role of emotions in communicating natural disasters. New paper in JCOM



Sissa Medialab

Milford Sound (South Island/Te Waipounamu) 

image: 

Milford Sound (Māori: Piopiotahi) is a fiord in the south west of New Zealand's South Island, within Fiordland National Park, Piopiotahi (Milford Sound) Marine Reserve, and the Te Wahipounamu World Heritage site. It has been judged the world's top travel destination in an international survey (the 2008 Travelers' Choice Destinations Awards by TripAdvisor) and is acclaimed as New Zealand's most famous tourist destination. Rudyard Kipling had previously called it the eighth Wonder of the World. Milford Sound is incorrectly named, as a sound is in fact a large sea or ocean inlet larger than a bay, deeper than a bight, and wider than a fjord, while Milford Sound is formed by the actions of glaciers.

view more 

Credit: Bernard Spragg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Te_Wahipounamu#/media/File:Milford_Sound_NZ._(16944937040).jpg





New Zealand — particularly the South Island/Te Waipounamu — is one of the most seismically active regions in the world. For this reason, the country has acknowledged the importance of building awareness and preparedness.

In this kind of disaster communicationemotions — whether conscious or not — play a crucial roleCaroline Rowe, researcher at the Centre for Sustainability Research, University of Otago, New Zealand, explored this dimension, showing how risk communication can balance fear and anxiety with positive emotions such as fascination and confidence, using vivid imagery, storytelling, and certainty. The result is an in-depth exploration of how emotional aspects of risk communication operate in a real-world context, contributing to a deeper understanding of risk communication in real-world contexts. The study was published in the special issue on emotions and science communication in the Journal of Science Communication (JCOM).


“In New Zealand there is a 75% chance of a magnitude 8 earthquake or greater happening on the Alpine Fault within the next 50 years,” explains Rowe. “So this got the interest of emergency managers who were saying, you know, we need to be better prepared for this.”

Launched in 2016 as a boundary organization, the Alpine Fault magnitude 8 - AF8 programme acts as an interface between seismic hazard science and emergency management practice, developing communication initiatives directed both at professionals and the wider public.

Rowe, who studies communication within the emergency management sector, recalls: “Through talking to emergency managers you could see that the programme had had this really strong kind of personal and organisational effect. I started to make the connection:  there’s something going on here with emotion.”

Her research consisted of two main parts. The first was a document analysis of 14 AF8 communication materials. “Tone came through as being something I wasn’t really expecting to see,” she notes. Scientists, she found, conveyed risk with enthusiasm and positivity: “It is not really what you expect when you’re talking about a massive earthquake. But they were really excited about the science and really excited to share that science.”

Their enthusiasm also stemmed from the South Island’s remarkable geology. “It’s one of the few places in the world where you can observe a plate boundary up close, along a major fault line,” she adds. “The Alpine Fault is a world-class example of this transform plate boundary.”

AF8’s communication also highlighted not only the threat but also the beauty of the landscape shaped by the same geological forces.

“Yes, there is this risk, and it is something that can cause anxiety, but it’s also part of where we live and it’s brought us beauty. The fault line itself is responsible for the landscape of the South Island. It’s brought economic value as well through tourism.”

The second part of the study involved interviews with emergency management professionals — from civil defence officials and indigenous and community leaders to police, fire, and medical services. Their responses revealed that AF8’s emotional appeals were handled with careful balance: an engaged yet reassuring tone, the use of certainty framing (inevitably grounded in historical data), and efficacy messages (“we can act and prepare”). Tools such as animations, maps, and postcard-like imagery of the Southern Alps helped make the risk tangible without inducing paralysis.

What emerges is a nuanced picture in which emotions have genuine value, not as something to suppress, but to understand and use wisely. For risk communicators, emotions are not a side effect to be avoided: eliminating them is impossible. Recognising and channelling them allows the positive aspects — such as self-efficacy, confidence, and motivation to act — to surface, while preventing fear and anxiety from taking over.

“People are going to feel emotions regardless. Risk communicators need to accept that and work with it,” concludes Rowe. “The risk itself is inherently scary,  but if it is framed with empowering messages of agency and efficacy, people are better able to deal with it.”

The paper “Walking the Faultline of Fear: How affect-inducing risk communication can help promote disaster preparedness” by Caroline Rowe, Caroline Orchiston and Fabien Medvecky is part of a JCOM special issue titled “Emotions and Science Communication”.

“This article shows how important it is to understand emotions in a context of risk and fear,” says Luisa Massarani, researcher at the Brazilian Institute of Public Communication of Science and Technology and one of the guest editors of the special issue on emotions and science communication.

"Despite their significant role, emotions are under-theorised and under-researched in science communication - although there is a growing interest among researchers and practitioners in understanding their role in science communication. This led us - Neta Shaby (UK), Daniel Silva Luna and myself - to propose this special issue, inviting researchers and practitioners around the globe to submit their manuscripts. We hope this special issue inspires other people to think further about the different facets of emotions and science communication , as well as to carry out more studies on the subject,” she says.


 

 

Between solstices and equinoxes



Reducing stigma around bipolar disorder on stage. New paper in JCOM



Sissa Medialab

Interview (stage photos - Oxímoro, entre Solstícios e Equinócios ) 

image: 

A moment fro the play Oxímoro, entre Solstícios e Equinócios

view more 

Credit: The Marionet Theatre Company




“People tend to joke about mood swings, saying ‘my mood swings throughout the day, I’m already a bit bipolar,’ or joke with each other saying ‘everything is bipolar.’ And it’s not quite like that, as bipolar disorder has a biological component.”

This is one of the statements featured in a short trailer on YouTube about bipolar disorder. The video is connected to the play Oxímoro, entre Solstícios e Equinócios (Oxymoron, Between Solstices and Equinoxes) by Marionet, a Portuguese theatre company that brings scientific research topics to the stage.

The play was developed through an in-depth collaboration with doctors, researchers, and patients, with the goal of informing and raising public awareness about bipolar disorder, helping to reduce the stigma surrounding this and other mental health conditions.

The project also included an analysis of audience responses to the performance, with a specific focus on emotional engagement. The results of this experience are described in a practice insight  published in the special issue of emotions and science communication in Journal of Science Communication (JCOM). According to the authors, the audience’s emotional response—empathy, emotional resonance, and personal identification—helped facilitate the assimilation of scientific information and contributed to reducing the stigma surrounding mental illness.

 

The Marionet theatre company has extensive experience staging works inspired by scientific research, explains Mário Montenegro (Marionet and Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies, University of Coimbra). “We have been working with science for 25 years,” he says. “But we only started to work on health subjects a few years ago.”

The company collaborates with scientific partners such as the Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology at the Universidade de Coimbra, which also conducts research on mental health. For this play, Montenegro and his colleagues collaborated with a group from the center with a project focused specifically on bipolar disorder, as well as health practitioners from the Integrated Psychiatry Responsibility Center of the Coimbra Hospital and University Center.

The scientific component entered the project from the very beginning, during the writing phase, and was complemented by direct testimonies from patients. “We felt the need to change our creative process, because these were delicate subjects that touched people’s lives. We realized we needed to be even better informed,” explains Montenegro. “So we based our work on interviews with patients, doctors, nurses, and relatives—to hear, in their own words, their experiences with these conditions. From those interviews, we then began building our creative material.”

Based on these interviews, Montenegro and his colleagues wrote the script for the play, composed of several scenes featuring different characters and situations, rather than a single story with a defined set of protagonists. The play, performed by professional actors, ran for five days at the BlackBox of Convento São Francisco in Coimbra, Portugal, from March 20 to 24, 2024, with a total of six performances.

After each show, audience members were invited to complete a questionnaire about their experience. Of the approximately 300 attendees overall, 54 responded. “It was an emotionally very strong play,” says Montenegro. “And the emotional engagement from the audience was very strong as well.” According to the authors’ analysis of the questionnaires, emotions proved to be a key factor in helping audiences understand and remember information about bipolar disorder. Engagement, empathy, and personal identification helped assimilate scientific content and contributed to reducing stigma and stereotypes, humanizing the illness.

Emotion, therefore, does not interfere with message accuracy, Montenegro believes: when intentionally and thoughtfully guided through staging and language, it strengthens it, motivating audiences to learn more and leaving a deeper, longer-lasting impact than purely informational communication. As he puts it: “An important aspect of our play was not to offer the audience a pre-established interpretation of the illness or of the situations represented in each scene. We left the interpretation open so that spectators could form their own opinions. In this way, everyone could receive the content in their own way and react emotionally according to their own sensitivity—because we are all very different.”

The paper “Theatre and bipolar disorder: dealing with emotions” by Mário Montenegro, Silvia Carballo and Francisca Moreira is part of a JCOM special issue titled “Emotions and Science Communication”.

“Theather is indeed a very powerful way for engaging people in science and health issues; recently, very important initiatives have been developed worldwide, including this (very beautiful) one from Portugal”, says Luisa Massarani, researcher at the Brazilian Institute of Public Communication of Science and Technology and one of the guest editors of the special issue on emotions and science communication.

"Despite their significant role, emotions are under-theorised and under-researched in science communication - although there is a growing interest among researchers and practitioners in understanding their role in science communication. This led us - Neta Shaby (UK), Daniel Silva Luna and myself - to propose this special issue, inviting researchers and practitioners around the globe to submit their manuscripts. We hope this special issue inspires other people to think further about the different facets of emotions and science communication , as well as to carry out more studies on the subject,” she says.

Bipolarism (stage photos - Oxímoro, entre Solstícios e Equinócios ) 


 

How family size affects your health: New study reveals surprising patterns



A new study links reproductive behavior to a wide range of diseases and mortality risks.



Chinese Medical Journals Publishing House Co., Ltd.

PheWAS plot of diseases related to the number of offspring among Chinese men and women. 

image: 

Panel (A): PheWAS plot for men without vs. with offspring. Panel (B): PheWAS plot for women without vs. with offspring. Panel (C): PheWAS plot for men with more than one vs. with one offspring. Panel (D): PheWAS plot for women with more than one vs. one offspring.

view more 

Credit: Dianjianyi Sun from Peking University Health Science Center





Parenthood exerts profound impacts on adult health. However, previous studies have largely focused on women and limited health outcomes, often producing inconsistent results due to variations in definitions of parenthood, insufficient adjustment for confounders, and short follow-up periods.

In this large-scale, population-based prospective cohort study, published in the Chinese Medical Journal on October 09, 2025, researchers used data from the China Kadoorie Biobank (CKB)—which includes over 500,000 adults aged 30–79 across 10 regions of China—to investigate the associations between the number of biological offspring (without vs. with offspring; more than one vs. one offspring) and a wide range of health conditions using a phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) approach. Analyses were performed separately for men and women. “Our study represents a major step forward because we looked at the relationship between the number of children an individual has and their health outcomes across the entire spectrum of human disease, a concept called ‘phenome-wide,’” shares Dr. Dianjianyi Sun from the School of Public Health at Peking University Health Science Center, one of the authors.

The study employed a rigorous, sex-stratified approach, primarily using PheWAS to systematically test the association between the number of offspring and a vast range of ICD-10 coded diseases. Cox Proportional-Hazards Models were used for the prospective analysis of morbidity and all-cause mortality over 12 years. The main exposure was analyzed through comparisons of childless individuals versus those with one offspring, and by modeling each additional offspring to quantify health risks. Finally, the Hazard Ratio (HR) was used as the statistical measure to represent the ratio of the instantaneous risk of an event occurring in an exposed group compared to the risk in an unexposed (reference) group, over a specified follow-up period. All resulting HRs were comprehensively adjusted for potential confounders to ensure the isolated effect of parity was measured.

After excluding diseases with fewer than 30 cases to ensure adequate statistical power, 568 diseases for men and 654 diseases for women were retained for PheWAS analysis. The PheWAS results, corrected for multiple testing using the Bonferroni method, revealed that having no biological offspring was strongly associated with an increased risk of schizophrenia in both men and women. Moreover, having more than one offspring compared to one was associated with disease risks across multiple systems.

Subsequent prospective analyses showed that, compared to men with one offspring, those without biological offspring had increased risks for nine of 36 diseases, including mental and behavioral disorders, cardiovascular disease, and respiratory conditions. Among women, those without offspring showed higher risks for five diseases of 37 diseases, including mental and behavioral disorders and cardiovascular conditions. Each additional offspring was associated with a 7% reduction in mental and behavioral disorders in both sexes, and an 18% lower breast cancer risk specifically in women. However, each additional offspring increased women's cholelithiasis and cholecystitis risk by 4%.

Meanwhile, among 282,630 patients with any of 26 self-reported diseases at baseline in CKB, 44,533 deaths were recorded. Interestingly, compared to those with offspring, male and female patients without offspring had a 37% and 27% higher risk of all-cause mortality, respectively. Additionally, among male patients, each additional offspring was associated with a 4% reduction in mortality risk. While among women, the lowest risk was observed among those with three to four offspring.

In summary, this study highlights a complex, sex-specific relationship between the number of biological offspring and long-term risks of morbidity and mortality in Chinese adults. Further research is needed to verify these findings, explore the underlying biological, behavioral, and social mechanisms involved, and elucidate potential causal relationships. Dr. Sun concludes, “We have demonstrated a robust, system-wide link between reproductive history and long-term health, highlighting the need for healthcare systems and policymakers to provide tailored health monitoring and support for individuals at both ends of the parity spectrum, to those who are childless, and to those who have larger families. This in turn can help address their specific, newly identified health vulnerabilities.”


Panel (A) and Panel (B): Kaplan-Meier estimates of the mortality risk are shown in the male (A) and female (B) patients with any of the 26 diseases at baseline, respectively. In each analysis, patients with offspring were taken as the reference group. Panel (C) and Panel (D): Sex-specific restricted cubic spline plots for the association between mortality risks and the number of offspring among men (C) and women (D).

Credit

Dianjianyi Sun from Peking University Health Science Center