Thursday, January 15, 2026

 

Putin attempting to freeze Ukraine into surrender

Putin attempting to freeze Ukraine into surrender
Putin is using Ukraine's freezing winters as a weapon. / bne IntelliNews
By Ben Aris in Berlin January 15, 2026

Russia is trying to freeze Ukraine into submission. As temperatures plunge to -20°C in Kyiv, the Armed Forces of Russia (AFR) has stepped up its barrage of drones and ballistic missiles to take out key heating and power infrastructure. Half of Ukraine’s capital is now in subzero darkness and the city’s mayor, Vitali Klitschko, said that anyone with somewhere else to go should leave. He is not the only one. Other governors in frontline regions have said the same.

The attacks are country wide. Russian forces launched another massive overnight drone attack on Zelenskiy’s home town of Kryvyi Rih on January 13, knocking out heat to more than 700 apartment buildings and cutting electricity to over 45,000 customers as temperatures dropped to –7°C, local officials said.

“Russia is attacking energy infrastructure in Kyiv, Dnipropetrovsk, Kharkiv and Zaporizhzhia regions. Russia deliberately plans these attacks during very cold weather to maximize the damage and bring more suffering to Ukrainian civilians,” Anton Gerashchenko, advisor to Ukraine’s Minister of Internal Affairs and founder of the Institute of the Future, said in a social media post this week.

The extreme cold temperatures of deep winter have arrived, with the mercury falling below -15°C. Russia has been attacking Ukraine’s energy infrastructure for more than two years, but the Kremlin has been waiting for the icy Siberian airmasses to settle over Ukraine, as they do every year, and is now scaling up the attacks. The targets have changed too. The non-nuclear generating capacity is already largely destroyed, but now the AFR is hitting the infrastructure – things like power substations, gas pipelines and hot water pumping stations. In just one attack this week, Russia used over 300 drones, 18 ballistic and seven cruise missiles to target energy that deprived people of power, water, and heating on January 13, according to Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha.

“Russia is deliberately trying to inflict conditions of life calculated to bring about physical destruction of the Ukrainian people—which falls exactly under the definition of Article II (c) of the Genocide Convention,” Sybiha said following the barrage against Kyiv.

Weaponizing the weather

Turning off the lights in Ukraine has been a long-standing strategy. Putin is using his ability to take out civilian energy infrastructure with highly accurate and powerful guided missiles as a tool in his ongoing efforts to force Ukraine to capitulate on Russian terms. While the damage has been dramatic and devastating, in typical Putin-style it has also been incremental. Putin has been proceeding step by step, starting with the generating capacity, but ignoring the substations until now.

Russia began to target the power sector in 2023 and over the next two years it destroyed virtually all of Ukraine’s non-nuclear generating capacity. Off limits for obvious reasons, the nuclear power stations have been left alone and account for about half of Ukraine’s generating capacity, but the substations that distribute their power have also been largely untouched so far.

With reduced output, last winter was harsh but between the repairs, imports, temporary container-sized generators largely supplied by USAID, and the surviving nuclear capacity the country managed to struggle through the season.

As deep winter arrives this year, the situation is already much more difficult. Since a missile war began this summer and Russia’s military production went into surplus, the AFR has changed tactics. It now flies in waves of hundreds of drones to denigrate air defences that are followed by a few powerful ballistic missiles that can destroy a target completely.

Power plants have been made vulnerable by the Energoatom corruption scandal. While Ukrenergo, the state-owned thermal utilities operator, built some 70 highly effective concrete bunkers to protect its infrastructure, a similar plan for nuclear power infrastructure under the control of Energoatom was never implemented, when Zelenskiy’s close associates siphoned off $100mn in a kickback scheme that was supposed to be spent on defences. At the same time the $1bn in foreign aid for the power sector raised by Ukrenergo fell away to almost nothing partly due to corruption in the sector.

The AFR is now capitalising on this weakness and has been targeting key energy and transport infrastructure that can knock out the power in entire cities and regions. Ukraine’s key ultra-high voltage 750kV substations are especially vulnerable, which provide power to whole cities and act as the regional interconnectors. So far, Russia has deliberately avoided hitting these hard to protect and hard to fix substations, but in the last two months the 750kV substations in Sumy and Odesa were knocked out leaving both in darkness for over a week.

Similar substation attacks are now being reported in Kyiv and other cities. A third of Kyiv is now without power or heat for several days, which has sparked limited public protests as the city starts to be uninhabitable, according to local reports.

Siberian airmasses arrive in Ukraine

Russia has clearly been waiting for the coldest part of the year to scale up its attack. A large cold mass of icy air from Siberia is now trapped over the country and temperatures have dropped below -20°C. In Ukraine, Belarus, and western Russia, temperatures will regularly drop to around −20°C over the next at least 14 days, according to the Ventusky metrological service, while daytime highs will be only around −10°C. These are below-average temperatures which, according to current forecasts, could persist throughout the entire month of January.

Families in Soviet-era apartment blocks have taken to huddling together in the smallest rooms to try and keep warm as internal temperatures fall to 13°C-15°C and will fall further. The “invincibility points” are back in use – small huts set up in the courtyard of apartment complexes where locals can go to warm up, cook some food and recharge their phones that were deployed after two years of the war during the first big missile barrages in January 2024.

With no prospect of the heating being restored soon, apartment block management have drained the water from central heating pipes to avoid them freezing and bursting. The bitterly cold weather is also shutting down supermarkets and offices.

“The humanitarian crisis in Kyiv and the region is intensifying amid prolonged power outages and severe winter conditions, Iuliia Mendel, Zelenskiy’s former press secretary said on social media. “​For the second consecutive day, photos and videos of empty store shelves—particularly bread—have been circulating widely on social media. Several supermarket chains have partially or temporarily closed locations due to extended blackouts and equipment failures in sub-zero temperatures.”

Ukraine's retail chains are starting to collapse. More and more stores cannot open or are suspending operations indefinitely after their equipment -- primarily refrigeration units -- cannot withstand the constant power surges and outages. The surges lead to breakdowns, product spoilage, and massive losses, leaving the urban populations unable to meet their basic needs. Photos of empty shelves are starting to pop up on social media as residents hunt for bread and other basics.

Public transport remains severely disrupted too. Kyiv’s metro is operating with delays or reduced service in many areas, while ground transport struggles with snow, ice, and power issues.

In some districts of Kyiv, residents are blocking roads in protest over multi-day blackouts. Windows in apartment blocks are blown out by constant missile and drone attacks but go unrepaired. In other cases, workers turn up at their offices only to go home again in a few hours thanks to the intense cold, reports Mendel.

A large-scale humanitarian crisis is brewing. If Russia’s campaign continues then western governments have been warned to prepare for a fresh wave of refugees fleeing the freezing conditions, bne IntelliNews diplomatic sources say.

 
 

Negotiating tactics

“Production of missiles is way up and interception rates are way down…” says journalist and bne IntelliNews columnist Leonid Ragozin. “Ukrainian air defence forces downed seven of 25 missiles fired by Russia last night. Quite a contrast with earlier in the war when all but a few missiles would be shut down, at least as per official reports.”

For the last two days, people in multiple cities have been without electricity, water, or sewage services, pushing living conditions to a critical brink. Thousands of generators are struggling to provide enough electricity to maintain even the most basic level of normalcy in people's lives as demand starts to overwhelm small-sale generating capacity.

Putin is attempting to freeze Ukraine into submission and has been using his ability to destroy the heating as a negotiating tool. Last summer, when there were hopes that a peace deal could be done after the Alaska summit on August 15, there was a preliminary follow up meeting between a Ukrainian and Russian delegation in Qatar – the first time officials from the warring parties agreed to meet since the failed 2022 Istanbul meeting. Top of the agenda was a limited offer to halt Russia’s attacks on Ukraine’s energy sector.

Putin tends to telegraph his intentions well in advance, although this is not widely appreciated. He made it clear in his Munich Security Conference (MSC) speech in 2007 that he was irked with Nato’s eastward expansion and that “Russia will push back” if it was not stopped, but he didn’t start modernising his army until 2012.

Around the same time, Putin ordered CBR governor Elvia Nabiullina to build up Russia’s hard currency reserves, increase the share of gold and start selling US treasury bills – a process that took years to complete. Putin plans for the long-term.

With the economy sanction-proofed, things went up a level in 2021. In the showdown with the EU over Ukraine, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned Europe what was coming in his “new rules of the game” speech delivered in February 2021. He warned Russia would break off diplomatic relations with Europe unless the 2014 sanctions were ended. That was followed by breaking off diplomatic relations with Nato in October the same year – another signal - and the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs eight-point list of demands in December in 2021. The Kremlin massed troops on Ukraine’s border twice ahead of the actual invasion in 2021 and again in 2022 before actually invading.

What has surprised with the war in Ukraine is when Putin finally loses patience, he has chosen the most extreme and dramatic escalation option on the table – starting with the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 itself, which few commentators expected from the otherwise cautious and slow-moving Putin.

Now Putin is employing the same step by step escalation of missile attacks on energy infrastructure. He has had the ability to knock out power from the start, but it is being done incrementally and he has waited until deep winter arrives to make it more effective.

The Qatar talks were an olive branch, albeit all the Kremlin was looking for was a capitulation on its own terms. They were called off after Russia launched its largest missile barrage against Kyiv since the start of the war a few days before. Typically, Russia launches increased attacks on Ukraine each time they are scheduled to meet, but in this case it appears Putin overplayed his hand and scuppered the first real attempt by the two sides to meet and negotiate.

Now the peace talks appear to have stalled again and so Putin is turning the screws on Kyiv by ratcheting up the energy attacks. A lot of progress was made in the last quarter, starting with the Witkoff-Dmitriev plan, named after its reported authors, US Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff and the head of Russia’s sovereign wealth fund, Kirill Dmitriev, who started meeting in October. That effort culminated in the Moscow meeting on December 3 between the US representatives and Putin and a 27-point peace plan (27PPP) that Russia said it was largely happy with.

However, following the Berlin meeting on December 14-15 and the Mar-a-Lago meeting between Trump and Zelenskiy on December 28 Ukraine came up with an alternative 20-point peace plan (20PPP) submitted to the Kremlin on Christmas Eve, which has since been largely rejected. Both Trump and Putin were pressuring Zelenskiy to do the deal at Mar-a-Lago, but without real Article 5-like security guarantees from his partners, Zelenskiy refused.

US President Donald Trump said that Ukraine, not Russia, is holding up a potential peace deal, in sharp contrast to rhetoric from European allies who have consistently said that Moscow has little interest in ending the war in Ukraine, Reuters reported on January 15. 

"I think [Putin] is ready to make a deal. I think Ukraine is less ready to make a deal," Trump said. Asked why US-led talks have so far failed to resolve Europe’s biggest land conflict since World War II, Trump replied: "Zelenskiy,"

Talks are continuing at the level of foreign ministries and amongst the envoys, but little progress has been made. The talks appear to have stalled again.

Cracks in Bankova’s position appearing

Putin’s tactics appear to be having an effect. Zelenskiy is putting a brave face on the deteriorating situation. “Russia must understand that the cold will not help win the war,” he said this week. But he admitted that the main target of this week’s strikes was again energy infrastructure - generation facilities and substations – and the significant destruction of residential and civil infrastructure. Dnipropetrovsk, Zhytomyr, Zaporizhia, Kyiv, Odesa, Sumy, Kharkiv and Donetsk regions were all simultaneously under attack. Hundreds of thousands of households are without electricity, according to the president.

Cracks in Bankova’s resistance are appearing. Zelenskiy’s call for Europe to rush stockpiled ammo to Kyiv this week smacks of growing desperation. This month Zelenskiy also said that the war might be over by summer – an unusual statement as Zelenskiy typically doesn’t give timelines.

In an interview, Ukraine’s former Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba, also said that Ukrainians are ready to accept territorial concessions to end the military conflict with Russia, something that Bankova has been adamant it won’t agree to until recently.

"What everyone sees in ratings and opinion polls is one story. But what people say on the streets and in their kitchens is quite another. When I travelled to villages and started talking to people outside of gas stations, I honestly stopped reading opinion polls,” Kuleba said. “My impression is this: if people are told, 'This is what we need to give up, but it will all stop, and this is what we'll get in return: a strong army, billions for reconstruction, and EU membership,'… I think this is a story that society will be ready to accept. Provided, of course, that it doesn't say anywhere that we are finally and irrevocably giving up any territories forever," Kuleba said.

So far, Zelenskiy is toughing a bad and worsening situation out. However, with temperatures in homes plummeting and shops emptying with at least two or three months of winter still to go, the question is how long can Ukraine’s population hold out.




Trump says Zelenskiy, not Putin, is holding up a Ukraine peace deal


Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy listens to US President Donald Trump, after Trump said that Russian President Vladimir Putin expressed willingness to help Ukraine "succeed", during a press conference at Trump's Mar-a-Lago club, in Palm Beach, Florida, US, Dec 28, 2025.
PHOTO: Reuters file

January 15, 2026 


WASHINGTON — US President Donald Trump told Reuters that Ukraine — not Russia — is holding up a potential peace deal, rhetoric that stands in marked contrast to that of European allies, who have consistently argued Moscow has little interest in ending its war in Ukraine.

In an exclusive interview in the Oval Office on Wednesday (Jan 14), Trump said Russian President Vladimir Putin is ready to wrap up his nearly four-year-old invasion of Ukraine. Zelenskiy, the US president said, was more reticent.

"I think he's ready to make a deal," Trump said of the Russian president. "I think Ukraine is less ready to make a deal."

Asked why US-led negotiations had not yet resolved Europe's largest land conflict since World War Two, Trump responded: "Zelenskiy."

Trump's comments suggested renewed frustration with the Ukrainian leader. The two presidents have long had a volatile relationship, though their interactions seem to have improved over Trump's first year back in office.

At times, Trump has been more willing to accept Putin's assurances at face value than the leaders of some US allies, frustrating Kyiv, European capitals and US lawmakers, including some Republicans.

In December, Reuters reported that US intelligence reports continued to warn that Putin had not abandoned his aims of capturing all of Ukraine and reclaiming parts of Europe that belonged to the former Soviet empire. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard disputed that report at the time.
'Having a hard time getting there'

After several fits and starts, US-led negotiations have been centred in recent weeks on security guarantees for a post-war Ukraine to ensure that Russia does not invade it again after a potential peace deal. In broad terms, US negotiators have pushed Ukraine to abandon its eastern Donbas region as part of any accord with Russia.

Ukrainian officials have been deeply involved in recent talks, which have been led on the US side by special envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law. Some European officials have cast doubt on the likelihood of Putin agreeing to some terms recently hashed out by Kyiv, Washington and European leaders.

Trump told Reuters he was not aware of a potential upcoming trip to Moscow by Witkoff and Kushner, which Bloomberg reported earlier on Wednesday.

Asked if he would meet Zelenskiy at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, next week, Trump said he would but implied no plans were set.

"I would — if he's there," Trump said. "I'm going to be there."

Asked why he believed Zelenskiy was holding back on negotiations, Trump did not elaborate, saying only: "I just think he's, you know, having a hard time getting there."

Zelenskiy has publicly ruled out any territorial concessions to Moscow, saying Kyiv has no right under the country's constitution to give up any land.


World

How Russia's and Ukraine's Neighbors See Them

by Benedict Vigers and Galina Zapryanova

This article is part of a series on global leadership approval ratings. Read more on approval of the U.S. and China among NATO countries and on EU approval among its member states.

LONDON — Nearly four years after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, neither country’s leadership earns high approval in its own backyard, and Ukraine’s slight edge has faded.

Across 25 countries in Eastern and Southern Europe, the Caucasus, and Central Asia, a median of 24% of adults approved of Ukraine’s leadership in 2025, down slightly from 27% in 2024. Approval of Russia’s leadership stood at 22%, mostly unchanged from the previous year.

Gallup has measured approval of Ukraine’s leadership throughout the region since 2024, while it has tracked views of Russia’s leadership since 2007. Russia’s current 22% average approval rating is marginally higher than where it stood after its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. At that time, regional approval of Russia had fallen to 19% from 31% in 2021. It has hovered near 20% ever since. Russia’s current approval rating is less than half of what it was at its highest point in 2008, when it stood at 45%.

Median approval of Ukraine’s leadership across the region has inched downward since 2024, from 27% to 24%. This mostly reflects sharp declines in Kazakhstan (down 16 percentage points), Romania and Georgia (both down 10 points) since 2024, while approval has been steadier elsewhere.

Clear Regional Divisions in Allegiances to Kyiv, Moscow

The region shows significant divides in relative approval of Kyiv and Moscow. Ten countries favor Kyiv (meaning their approval of Ukraine’s leadership exceeds their approval of Russia’s by at least 10 percentage points), eight are more aligned with Moscow, and seven show no clear preference — a picture similar to 2024.

The Baltic states show the strongest support for Ukraine over Russia, led by Lithuania (66-point gap), Latvia (52 points) and Estonia (51 points). Central Asia leans heavily toward Russia, with Tajikistan showing a 58-point gap and Kyrgyzstan 50 points. Four countries where Russia leads show gaps in approval exceeding 20 points. By contrast, all 10 countries favoring Kyiv do so. Countries with no clear preference, including Romania, Slovakia, Moldova, Greece and Hungary, cluster in Southern and Eastern Europe.

These regional allegiances reflect a mixture of broader historical ties and economic interests. In the Baltics, Ukraine’s struggle is often seen as their own, and they view Russia’s military actions as a potential threat to their sovereignty.

On the other hand, countries in Central Asia share close economic, cultural and media ties with Russia. Many Central Asian migrants work in Russia and send remittances home, boosting their national economies.

Countries in Southern and Eastern Europe, where there is no clear lead in approval, have historical ties and economic dependencies with both the European Union and Russia. The economic pain of decoupling from Russian energy continues to weigh on the region. At the same time, many of these countries are deeply integrated within the EU, and EU leadership approval is higher than that of both Russia and Ukraine.

Significant Political Divides in Key EU Countries Hungary and Slovakia

Although their populations offer low approval of both Russia’s and Ukraine’s leadership, EU member states Slovakia and Hungary have been the bloc’s most vocal opponents of military support for Kyiv.

Led by Prime Ministers Robert Fico and Viktor Orban, respectively, these nations are the most aligned with the Kremlin’s positions, international networks and economic interests. Because many EU decisions regarding sanctions and aid require unanimity, Slovakia and Hungary have the power to delay or dilute actions aimed at bolstering Ukraine.

In both countries, views of Ukraine and Russia are sharply divided along partisan lines. Supporters of Fico’s Direction Party are nearly three times as likely to approve of Moscow (38%) as Kyiv (14%), while supporters of the opposition Progressive Slovakia Party are much more approving of Kyiv (45%) than Moscow (3%).

The Russia-Ukraine divide runs deeper in Hungary, where a majority of Orban’s Fidesz Party supporters approve of Russia’s leadership (55%), compared with only 3% who approve of Ukraine’s. By contrast, 41% of those aligned with the opposition TISZA Party approve of Kyiv, while 13% approve of Moscow.

These partisan gaps help explain why EU support for Ukraine remains contested in some member states. Hungary and Slovakia have delayed EU sanctions on Russia and questioned military aid to Ukraine. Supporters of the parties currently in power (Direction, Fidesz) are largely aligned with this more favorable stance toward Russia, giving their leaders more domestic backing to resist EU consensus. But elections could shift these positions quickly. Hungary votes in April 2026, with polls forecasting a close race between Fidesz and TISZA.

Bottom Line

As the war in Ukraine continues, Kyiv and Moscow earn similar approval ratings from the wider region, with a slight slip in approval of Kyiv over the past year. However, relative approval of the two countries’ leadership varies considerably by geography, with the Baltics leaning heavily toward Kyiv, Central Asia favoring Moscow, and several Southern and Eastern European nations not clearly aligned with either.

Many efforts have been made to bring the war to an end in recent months, with U.S. President Donald Trump recently hosting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Florida to discuss options. This concluded with Trump acknowledging that some “thorny issues” remain unresolved. However, if the war does end in the near future, regional approval ratings could factor into the regional political landscape Ukraine faces as it rebuilds, as well as which countries fall into Kyiv’s or Moscow’s orbit in the years to come.

Stay up to date with the latest insights by following @Gallup on X and on Instagram.

For complete methodology and specific survey dates, please review Gallup's Country Data Set details. Learn more about how the Gallup World Poll works.


















An Archive of material relating to Nestor Makhno and the Makhnovshchina.

Makhno was a Ukrainian anarchist revolutionary and the commander of an independent anarchist army in Ukraine from 1917–21.


Oct 24, 2019 ... History of the Makhnovist movement, 1918-1921 ; Contributor: Internet Archive ; Language: English ; Author (alternate script): Аршинов, П ; Item ...



 

EU will maintain Arctic cooperation with US, von der Leyen says amid Greenland tensions

Ursula von der Leyen said the EU would deepen its focus on Arctic security.
Copyright European Union, 2025.


By Jorge Liboreiro
Published on 

Amid Donald Trump's threats to seize Greenland, Ursula von der Leyen says the EU will continue working with the US to reinforce Arctic security. At the same time, the European Commission has confirmed that Greenland is "in principle" covered by the bloc's mutual assistance clause.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has said the European Union will continue to work closely with the United States to strengthen security in the Arctic even as US President Donald Trump persists with his threats to seize Greenland from Denmark.

"The European Union has a very good reputation in Greenland, and we are counting very much on the excellent cooperation that we have," von der Leyen said on Thursday on an official visit to Limassol, Cyprus.

"We will thus continue our work on Arctic security with our allies (and) our partners, including the United States," she added.

Trump has framed his expansionist agenda as a national security goal.

On Wednesday, the American president said that NATO would become "more formidable and effective with Greenland in the hands of the United States". Otherwise, he said, Russia and China would stand to benefit in the strategic region.

"Anything less than that is unacceptable," he wrote on his social media platform, Truth Social.

His remarks coincided with a meeting in Washington between the foreign ministers of Denmark and Greenland, US Secretary Marco Rubio, and US Vice President JD Vance.

The Danish minister, Lars Løkke Rasmussen,said the tone had been frank and constructive, but conceded there remained a "fundamental disagreement" between the two sides.

"We didn't manage to change the American position," he said at the end of the meeting. "It's clear that the president has this wish of conquering over Greenland."

Rasmussen added that Denmark and the US had agreed to set up a high-level "working group" to find a "common way forward" on the matter of Greenland. He also countered Trump's claims that Chinese warships had gained ground around the island.

At the same time, several European countries began to publicly announce their intention to send military officers as part of a reconnaissance mission to the mineral-rich territory, a stark reflection of the sky-high tensions fuelled by Trump's vision.

France, Germany, Sweden, Norway and the Netherlands are among those that have committed to joining the mission at Copenhagen's request.

Speaking as she marked the start of the Cypriot presidency of the EU Council, von der Leyen promised to "double down" on investments and cooperation in Greenland.

"What is clear is that Greenland can count on us politically, economically, and financially," she said at a press conference, standing next to the Cypriot President Nikos Christodoulides.

"When it comes to its security, the discussions on Arctic security are, first and foremost, a core issue of NATO. But I also want to emphasise that the Arctic and Arctic security, both topics, are core topics for the European Union and matter enormously for us."

Mutual assistance

Separately, the European Commission confirmed that Denmark would be able to invoke the EU's mutual assistance clause in the event of an armed attack against Greenland, even though the semi-autonomous island is not part of the bloc.

The Commission had recently avoided clarifying the legal application.

"Greenland is part of the territory of the Kingdom of Denmark and therefore in principle covered by the mutual solidarity clause in Article 42.7 TEU," a Commission spokesperson told Euronews in a statement.

"However, currently the question doesn't ask itself," the spokesperson added, referring to the fact that Trump's threats have not yet been translated into action.

The mutual assistance clause is enshrined in Article 42.7 of the EU treaties, which says that if a country is "the victim of armed aggression on its territory", the other member states will have an "obligation of aid and assistance by all the means in their power" in accordance with the right of collective self-defence recognised by the UN Charter.

The article does not spell out what measures qualify as "aid and assistance" in practice.

According to an explanatory memo from the Commission, member states should have ample margin to decide their support, which could be of a diplomatic, technical, medical or civilian nature. Military assistance is also envisioned.

Activating the article requires an attack "from abroad" carried out by state or non-state actors, the memo says. The decision to activate rests solely on the member state under assault. Once triggered, the duty to assist becomes "legally binding".

Since its introduction in 2007, Article 42.7 has been invoked only once, when France fell victim to the terrorist attacks of November 2015 and asked other member states to contribute manpower to its Opération Sentinelle.

Notably, Article 42.7 establishes a direct connection with NATO's Article 5, which is the bedrock of the transatlantic alliance's collective defence. Most EU countries are members of NATO, creating an overlap of commitments and obligations.

Unlike the EU provision, which is broadly worded, NATO's Article 5 is more explicit, compelling allies to take necessary action "including the use of armed force" to "restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area".

However, given that both the US and Denmark are members of NATO, there is no precedent to determine how Article 5 would apply in a scenario where the American military violated Danish sovereignty and seized Greenland by force.

Such a dilemma emerged in 2020 when Turkey and Greece were involved in a standoff over Ankara's contested gas exploration in waters claimed by Athens. In response, Greece put its army on alert, bringing two NATO members to the brink of war.


 'EU-US trade deal is separate from Greenland dispute,' top MEP McAllister tells Euronews


By Vincenzo Genovese
Published on 

David McAllister, the influential chair of the European Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs, argues the parliament should not derail the ratification the EU-US trade deal to punish Trump over US threats to acquire Greenland in an interview with Euronews.

A top member of the European Parliament has warned against blocking the ratification of the trade deal signed by the EU and the United States last summer in retaliation for the bellicose language around Greenland from the Trump administration.

"We need to separate the two issues: the EU-US trade deal and support for Greenland", top European People's Party MEP David McAllister told flagship Euronews morning show Europe Today on Thursday.

"We need to finalise the US trade talks because companies need predictability," added McAllister, who is chair of the European Parliament's committee on foreign affairs.

The European Parliament must ratify the agreement reached by Donald Trump and the Commission's President Ursula von der Leyen last August in Scotland, which tripled tariffs on EU products while reducing to zero industrial good coming from the US.

The US is pushing to have the full ratification of the agreement in place, but several MEPs are considering blocking the approval process to protest Trump's ownership demands on the Danish territory which he claims will happen "one way or another."

McAllister said "there are different views within the political groups" of the European Parliament but insisted the two should be treated as the two issues.

"The EPP and the European Conservatives are for moving forward [approving the deal], he said. "The Socialists, liberals and greens perhaps want to postpone the vote."

On Wednesday, the Parliament issued a joint statement from the leaders of the political groups expressing their "unequivocal support to Greenland and Denmark" and condemned the bellicose language employed by the US, which has not ruled out military means to gain ownership of the semi-autonomous rich in rare earth minerals.

"We have been very clear in our commitment towards Greenland. The European Union will step up its engagement in Greenland: financial support for it will be doubled in the next annual multi-financial framework," the statement said.


European troops arrive in Greenland as US and Denmark talks fail to resolve dispute


By Aleksandar Brezar  Published on 

The deployment was announced the same day the foreign ministers of Denmark and Greenland met with US Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Washington.


European military personnel began arriving in Greenland on Thursday, hours after a meeting between US, Danish and Greenlandic officials in Washington failed to resolve what Denmark's foreign minister called "fundamental disagreement" over the mineral-rich Arctic island.

France, Sweden, Germany and Norway announced Wednesday they would deploy military personnel as part of a reconnaissance mission to Greenland's capital Nuuk.

Germany's defence ministry said Thursday that the reconnaissance mission to Greenland by several European NATO members aims "to explore options for ensuring security in light of Russian and Chinese threats in the Arctic".

A 13-strong Bundeswehr reconnaissance team would deploy to Nuuk from Thursday to Sunday at Denmark's invitation, the ministry said.

French President Emmanuel Macron said on Thursday France would soon send more "land, air, and sea" forces to join the military exercise in Greenland.

"A first team of French service members is already on site and will be reinforced in the coming days with land, air, and maritime assets," Macron told troops during a speech to start the new year.

"Soldiers of NATO are expected to be more present in Greenland from today and in the coming days. It is expected that there will be more military flights and ships," Greenland's Deputy Prime Minister Mute Egede told a news conference Wednesday, adding they would be conducting "training".

Meanwhile, the Netherlands and Estonia announced they would join the exercise, which Dutch Foreign Minister Ruben Brekelmans described as a signal that security matters in Greenland and the region are "of strategic importance to all NATO allies."

Estonia was also "ready to put boots on the ground if requested," Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna said in a post on X.

The deployment was announced the same day the foreign ministers of Denmark and Greenland met with US Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Washington.

Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen, speaking after leaving the White House, said a US takeover of Greenland was "absolutely not necessary."

"We didn't manage to change the American position. It's clear the president has this wish of conquering Greenland," Løkke told reporters. "We therefore still have a fundamental disagreement, but we also agree to disagree."

US President Donald Trump has repeatedly vowed to take control of the autonomous Danish territory, arguing it is vital for US security.

Trump: 'I think something will work out'

Trump, speaking after the meeting which he did not attend, for the first time sounded conciliatory on Greenland, acknowledging Denmark's interests even as he again said he was not ruling out any options.

"I have a very good relationship with Denmark, and we'll see how it all works out. I think something will work out," Trump said without explaining further.

He reiterated that Denmark was powerless if Russia or China sought to occupy Greenland, but added, "There's everything we can do."

Trump has appeared emboldened on Greenland after ordering a surprise 3 January attack in Venezuela that removed Nicolás Maduro.

On the streets of Nuuk, red-and-white Greenlandic flags flew in shop windows, on apartment balconies and on cars and buses in a show of national unity this week.

Some residents described anxiety from finding themselves at the centre of the geopolitical spotlight.

"It's very frightening because it's such a big thing," said Vera Stidsen, 51, a teacher in Nuuk. "I hope that in the future we can continue to live as we have until now: in peace and without being disturbed."

Jorge Liboreiro contributed reporting.