Wednesday, May 15, 2024

Revealed: US university lecturer behind far-right Twitter account and publishing house

Guardian investigation identifies Jonathan Keeperman, a former lecturer at the University of California, Irvine, as ‘Lomez’




A Guardian investigation has identified former University of California, Irvine (UCI) lecturer Jonathan Keeperman as the man behind the prominent “new right” publishing house Passage Press and the influential Twitter persona Lomez.

The identification is based on company and property records, source interviews and open-source online materials.

The reporting has revealed that Keeperman’s current status as a key player and influential tastemaker in a burgeoning proto-fascist movement came after years of involvement in far-right internet forums.

Much of that journey coincided with his time at one of the country’s most well-regarded writing programs: Keeperman first came to UCI as a master of fine arts (MFA) student, and was also a lecturer in the English department from 2013 to 2022, according to public records.

The emergence of Passage Press and other such publishers has been a key part of the development of a swathe of the current American far right, which is seeking to capture US institutions – or develop far-right equivalents – as part of a political and cultural war against what it sees as the dominance of a liberal “regime” in America.

In a June 2023 podcast interview, Keeperman characterized Passage Press and its literary prize as part of this effort to “build out alternative infrastructure, alternative institutions”.

The library on the UCI campus in 2022. Photograph: Paul Bersebach/Orange County Register via Getty Images

It is a fight wholeheartedly embraced by Donald Trump and his supporters in the Republican party, especially in their railing against “the deep state” and promises of retribution should Trump win the 2024 presidential election.

The Guardian repeatedly contacted Keeperman requesting comment on this reporting, at a personal Gmail address and a Passage Press address, and left a voicemail message at a telephone number that data brokers listed as belonging to Keeperman, but which carried a message identifying it as belonging to a member of his household.

Keeperman did not directly respond to these requests. However, hours after a request on 1 May, “Lomez” on X castigated “lying, libelous journalist-activists” and appeared to make veiled legal threats. Another detailed request was sent on 5 May, and just an hour later, Passage Press’s star writer posted about a “major legacy media outlet threatening to dox a pseudonymous Twitter account”.

Scary ideas – and wanting to be recognized

Passage Press books include a Tucker Carlson-blurbed anthology of writings by “human biodiversity” influencer Steve Sailer; a similar retrospective from “neo-reactionary” guru Curtis Yarvin; and a print version of the biannual Man’s World.

Like many other far-right publishers, Passage’s list is bolstered by reprints of out-of-print or public-domain books by historical fascist and reactionary writers. These include books by radical German nationalist and militarist Ernst Jünger; Peter Kemp, who fought as a volunteer in Franco’s army during the Spanish civil war; and two counter-revolutionary Russian aristocrats, White Russian general Pyotr Wrangel and Prince Serge Obolensky.

A James McAdams, professor of international affairs at the University of Notre Dame, who has done extensive research on far-right thinkers and publishing houses, said such publishers operate “on the level of ideas – scary ideas – but it’s also about wanting to be recognized, and finally it’s about money”.

“This is a source of money,” McAdams continued. “The general public does not know about Ernst Jünger, but you can sell his books to the far right, and you can make money.”

Ernst Jünger, seen here in Baden-Württemberg, Germany, on 31 December 1996. Photograph: Süddeutsche Zeitung Photo/Alamy

Passage Press differs from many others in its niche in offering new work by the contemporary far-right’s intellectual celebrities, and in curating in-person events and a far-right literary award.

The publisher also produces high-end limited editions of selected titles. The “patrician edition” of Noticing, a book by Sailer, for example, is “bound in genuine leather, gold-foil stamping” and “Smyth-sewn book block”, according to the website.

Though lavishly produced, the “patrician” offerings appear to have generated significant income for Passage. At the time of reporting, Passage had sold out its limited run of 500 patrician editions of Noticing at $395 apiece, according to the website. This equates to some $195,000 in revenue. An earlier patrician edition of winning entries in the 2021 Passage prize sold 250 editions at $400 apiece, according to the website, representing another $100,000 in revenue.

The publication of Noticing – also available as a $29.95 paperback – was spun out into a series of in-person events in Austin, Los Angeles, Miami and New York City, held in March, April and May.

Passage offered a $75 bundle comprising a copy of the book and a ticket to an in-person event, though the website warned prospective attendees: “Location details will be delivered via email. No photos or recordings of any kind will be permitted at these events.”

Buyers of the patrician edition could attend “salon events” in these cities for a $300 upcharge. These were advertised as “small, intimate spaces that include dinner, an open bar, and a unique conversational setting with Steve and special guests”. The website did not indicate how many salon tickets were available, but at the time of writing they had sold out.

Passage Press has also commenced publishing a print version of the hitherto online-only magazine Man’s World, which is helmed by the pseudonymous editor “Raw Egg Nationalist” (“REN”), a British writer who was described in left-right syncretist magazine Compact as “one of the brighter stars in a sprawling constellation of rightwing social-media influencers who exalt nature, tradition, and physical fitness”.

Pyotr Wrangel, commanding general in the Russian civil war, in 1920. Photograph: Universal Images Group/Getty Images

REN, who has previously published cookbooks with white nationalist publisher Antelope Hill, batters his social media followers and Substack subscribers with dubious dietary and health information along with “anti-globalist” conspiracy theories. He came to wider prominence when he was featured in a 2022 documentary, The End of Men, produced by Tucker Carlson when Carlson still worked at Fox News.

“REN and Man’s World represents a paradigm case of how masculinity is being articulated at the heart of rightwing politics,” said Scott Burnett, an assistant professor of African studies and women’s, gender and sexuality studies at Pennsylvania State University.

“There’s stuff in Man’s World that is fascist, sometimes bordering on neo-Nazi,” he added, but it is draped in “an ironic gauze”.

Currently, Passage is soliciting entries for the third annual Passage prize, an art and literature prize for rightwingers who feel “straight-jacketed by the increasingly hysterical and vicious gatekeepers of their institutional homes”.

‘L0m3z’ on Twitter

In previous coverage, Lomez and REN have been identified as prominent members of the so-called “new right”, a term that has gained currency as a description of a cluster of illiberal, anti-democratic, “counter-revolutionary” tendencies in rightwing politics in the US.

Lomez acquired early influence in the new right movement by means of the L0m3z account on X, which has 55,000 followers at the time of reporting.

Internet archives have preserved a range of the posts with which he attracted a large audience, but also suggest he has deleted many of these.

One of the account’s themes is an antipathy for racial justice protests, especially after the George Floyd protests in 2020.

Lomez also supported those who responded to protests with violence, posting at the end of Kyle Rittenhouse’s trial: “Rittenhouse is a hero. He is a symbol, in word and deed, and in his baseless persecution, of what is good and decent and courageous and the forces arrayed against those qualities. May a million Kyle Rittenhouses bloom.”

Anti-LGBTQ+ sentiments also have constituted a consistent theme on the account. In January 2020, he wrote he was “coming around to the idea that the most powerful and effective political argument against the left in 2020 is probably simple as: shut up fag.”

Kyle Rittenhouse testifies during his trial in Kenosha, Wisconsin, on 10 November 2021. Photograph: Reuters

Journalists have also been a favorite target of the account. A post reads: “the press are in fact the enemy. They are mewling midwit scum. Sniveling liars and desperate status junkies. My abiding contempt for them is only ever confirmed.”

A list of “policy proposals” begins with “lamppost the journos” – an apparent call for summary lynchings of members of the media.

As the Twitter account grew, Lomez increasingly engaged in chummy interactions with prominent far-right figures including self-described eugenicist Bo Winegard, but above all with culture warrior Christopher Rufo, with whom Lomez has had dozens of interactions.

The Guardian has reported in several stories in recent months on Rufo’s links with far-right media outlets, would-be “warlords” and proponents of scientific racism.

Rufo has characterized these stories on social media as illegitimate “guilt by association”.

The former MFA student in print

Keeperman was able to parlay the growing clout of his Twitter account into commissions at the many rightwing media outlets that allowed him to publish under a social media pseudonym.

Early bylines included a March 2020 piece in the Claremont Institute’s publication, the American Mind, in which he argued that “retards” better anticipated the impact of the early stages of the Covid pandemic than “midwit experts”, and a March 2021 piece at online far-right magazine IM-1776, in which he encouraged readers to believe that they were involved in a “fifth-generation war” against their perceived political enemies.

More recently, in a February piece at the Federalist, Lomez argued that the prosecution of “alt-right” personality Douglass Mackey, once known online as “Ricky Vaughn”, represents the state using an “expansive reading of civil rights law to punish their political enemies and flex their tyrannical authority”.

Mackey was sentenced to seven months in prison last October for election interference over his dispatch of mass text messages in November 2016 urging Black recipients to “vote by text” instead of casting a legitimate vote, with the messages purporting to be sponsored by the Clinton campaign. Mackey is currently appealing that verdict.

Keeperman’s most influential publication as Lomez, however, may have been an essay published in “theocon” outlet First Things, which popularized a new right anti-feminist concept: “the longhouse”. The essay defines the longhouse as a metaphor for the supposed “overcorrection of the last two generations toward social norms centering feminine needs and feminine methods for controlling, directing, and modeling behavior”.

This metaphor has been widely adopted by writers on the anti-feminist right, including Rufo, religious conservative Rod Dreher and writers for outlets such as the American Mind.

Christopher Rufo in Sarasota, Florida, on 25 January 2023. Photograph: Thomas Simonetti for the Washington Post via Getty Images

In the piece, “Lomez” proffered the Passage prize competition, then accepting submissions in its second iteration, as a way “to remedy this problem, to provide an arena for the competing visions that exit from the longhouse will require”.

But it was in launching the first Passage prize in late 2021 that Keeperman inadvertently offered crucial clues that tied him to the Lomez persona.

How the Guardian identified Keeperman

Keeperman appears to have made considerable efforts to limit his online footprint, thereby reducing the possibility that he would be linked to the Lomez persona. Keeperman has no discoverable profiles in his own name on social media, blogging or professional-networking sites.

The identification was made possible by unavoidable traces left in public records such as property deeds and public salary records, but also by the sequence of events that led up to the announcement of the first Passage prize.


According to Whois records, the domain passageprize.com was registered on 6 October 2021 via a domain name registrar who anonymized the domain’s true owner.

One day later, Passage Press LLC was registered in New Mexico. Filings name Jonathan Keeperman as the sole member of the LLC and online legal services company LegalZoom.com Inc as the organizer.

At that time, only one other company called Passage Press LLC existed in any US jurisdiction – that one was owned by a female freelance technical writer and editor in Colorado and had been established in 2014, and its website is now dormant.

The Keeperman-founded New Mexico company was dissolved in December 2023. Passage Press LLC was re-registered in Delaware on 9 May 2022. The Delaware registration only identifies a corporate services company as agent and director.

Although the New Mexico LLC registration was registered at a mailbox provider in Garden City, Idaho, another company that lists Keeperman as a member – Paradise Valley Partners – is registered at a Livingston, Montana, address. The property at that address is co-owned by Keeperman, according to Park county property records.

Less than a week after the 2021 domain and New Mexico company registrations, “Lomez” announced the Passage prize on his Twitter account. Snapshots preserved by internet-archiving services indicate that by at latest 14 October 2021, a webpage at passageprize.com was soliciting entries for the Passage prize, “a literature and arts contest” with “a $10,000 prize pool”.

The proximity in time of the domain registration, Lomez’s competition announcement and the company registration identifying Jonathan Keeperman as Passage Press’s sole member offer one line of evidence for the identification of Keeperman as Lomez.

Posts by “Lomez” on what is now X reveal crucial details that line up with Keeperman’s biography.

In January, he posted that he was the third child in his family, which matches details offered in public accounts, including a parent’s published biography.

That obituary says that Keeperman’s parent died on 1 October 2022. On 3 October 2022, a post by Lomez indicates that his father had died in the immediate past.

Also, a range of posts indicate that the person behind Lomez worked at a university, attended graduate school and spent extended time in an academic milieu.

A 20 September 2022 tweet indicates that “Lomez” has decided to resign from his job, blaming a “bio-statist ukase”.

The date coincides with the beginning of the University of California, Irvine’s 2022-2023 academic year. A personnel record obtained via records request from UCI indicates that Keeperman departed UCI at the end of that academic year, finishing in his then-100% remote position on 30 June 2023. The record gives the reason as “resign – moved out of area”.

The tweet referencing unwelcome decrees came weeks after UCI’s August 2022 policy changes that generally required staff to spend several days a week on campus, and tightened eligibility for wholly remote work and out-of-state remote work for UCI employees. In July 2022, UCI’s chancellor announced an extension of the university’s pandemic mask mandate through that school year.

As Lomez, the Montana-based Keeperman posted conspiracy-tinged tweets about masks and vaccines before and since the tweet indicating his departure from UCI.

This alignment of Twitter posts and biographical events in Keeperman’s life are another line of evidence for him being behind the “Lomez” persona.

UCI connections

Until his departure from UCI, Keeperman had been a composition teacher in the English department. California salary records published by Nevada Policy show Keeperman earning a UCI salary every year from 2013 to 2022, except for the pandemic year of 2020; the UCI personnel record indicates that he originally began working for the university in January 2009; his earliest rating on RateMyProfessors.com is from July 2010.

In 2015, a local media report from Santa Monica announcing a book reading by authors recently published in the Santa Monica Review, described him as one of two “recent grads of the UC Irvine creative writing MFA program”.

In 2016, Keeperman was mentioned by another southern California media outlet when it published a press release from the UCI College Republicans. The release was a response to the club’s suspension following their invitation of conservative provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos on to the campus.

Milo Yiannopoulos in Australia in 2017. Photograph: Mike Bowers/The Guardian

The title of the planned Yiannopolous talk was “Social justice is cancer”, according to contemporaneous media reports. At that time, Yiannopoulos’s campus visits were attracting protests and counter-protests in the UK and the US.

The press release featured a supportive quote from Keeperman, in which he said: “Freedom of speech is an extraordinary right that requires extraordinary vigilance to uphold. We must do everything possible at our universities to allow for the exchange of all political ideas, even those that may shock and offend, and allow for rebuttal to those ideas through civil debate.”

No other UCI faculty were quoted in the release.

Keeperman was also involved in labor activism as a member of UCI’s American Federation of Teachers chapter, and spoke at several conferences about labor conditions for lecturers, who are not tenured.

A former colleague of Keeperman’s, who worked closely with him in such activism within the UC system, positively identified Keeperman’s voice from recordings of his many guest appearances on far-right podcasts.

An early persona: Mr Lomez

One of those podcast appearances as Lomez was an episode of the Carousel published on 10 May 2023. Host Isaac Simpson asked “Lomez” about his history online.

“I’m on my third [Twitter] account,” “Lomez” replied. “They’ve all been some version of Lomez. My, I mean, I’ve been posting in this Twitter space since about 2015-ish.”

He added: “I knew a lot of people from Steve Sailer’s comment section on his old iSteve blog, and a lot of the people who I ended up following on Twitter initially were people I recognized or were familiar to me from, from that comment section, and it was the kind of people that Sailer would link to.”

On the question of his online history, “Lomez” concluded: “Actually, I ran a blog. I’m not going to talk about it too much because there’s potentially doxable material there, but I actually ran a blog at one point that … well, I’ve already said too much, so anyway, I’ll just stop there.”

An individual with the screen name “Mr Lomez” was a frequent commenter on Steve Sailer’s iSteve blog between 2012 and 2014. The archives of Sailer’s early blogging have since been transferred – along with comments – to the Unz Review, an aggregator of far-right content run by antisemitic software millionaire Ron Unz.

Mr Lomez posted criticisms of affirmative action in college admissions, commentary on the trial of George Zimmerman over his fatal shooting of Trayvon Martin, and complaints about anti-immigrant parties being characterized as “far-right” in media coverage.

Mr Lomez also frequently flexed literary expertise, a deep knowledge of sports and a particularly intimate familiarity with college athletics.

In a post on 23 February 2013, Sailer was critical of the William Pereira-designed architecture at the UCI campus, with his post including a photograph of the Social Science Tower.

“Mr Lomez” commented: “My office is in that building. It’s as bad on the inside as it is on the out – claustrophobic and soulless. I feel like I’m in a rat maze.”

Keeperman maintained a separate blog under “Mr Lomez” in 2006 and 2007.

The Social Sciences Tower on the campus of the University of California Irvine in 2020. Photograph: Steve Cukrov/Alamy

The self-portrait – which includes a photo – that begins in the first post on that blog, made on 29 November 2006, appears to be of the same person depicted in the few other publicly available images of Keeperman, including one in a now-paywalled (but archived) article at the California Federation of Teachers website, and others in a third-party archive of his wedding photos, which link to the archive using Keeperman’s wife’s name on Facebook.

In comments on the blog, interlocutors address him as “Joey”. University of California, San Diego men’s basketball media guides indicate that a “Joey Keeperman” played for the team in 2001-02, when Keeperman was 19.

Local news and high-school basketball reporting from 2000 indicates that as a high-school senior, Keeperman was an accomplished football wide receiver and star basketball player for Campolindo high school in Moraga, in northern California. “Joey” and “Jonathan” are used interchangeably in the coverage.

Moraga is the same northern California town where Keeperman was raised, according to the 2022 parental obituary, and is also where Keeperman celebrated his bar mitzvah in 1996, according to a contemporaneous issue of the Jewish News of Northern California.

Posts on the blog detail his travels in south-east Asia, including destinations “Lomez” has mentioned on Twitter. Another post mentions a sibling’s health problems, and that sibling’s first name matches that of one of Keeperman’s siblings.

In the last posts on the blog, there are hints of the racial thinking that “Mr Lomez” would later express on Sailer’s blog.

On 2 May 2007, in response to a New York Times report on a study that found racial bias in NBA refereeing, Keeperman made an argument characteristic of “human biodiversity” proponents: “I’m gonna go out on a limb and suggest that black players get called for more fouls because black players do in fact commit more fouls.”

Keeperman added: “Before calling me a racist, at least hear me out.”

COGNITIVE DISSONANCE
Saudi money has reshaped boxing but how do we justify the human cost?


In a defining week for Tyson Fury, Oleksandr Usyk and boxing, the glitz of a unifying world heavyweight contest sits uncomfortably against a backdrop of human rights concerns

View image in fullscreenTyson Fury attends Monday’s media day as the hype machine for Saturday’s lucrative heavyweight clash moved into high gear. Photograph: Nick Potts/PA


Donald McRae in Riyadh
THE GUARDIAN
Tue 14 May 2024 

Just after five o’clock on Monday morning, at the very start of fight week in Riyadh, a beautiful and hauntingly insistent call to prayer rang out across this corner of the city. Tyson Fury and Oleksandr Usyk may still have been asleep, allowing themselves to rest a little longer before a defining fight for the undisputed heavyweight championship of the world late on Saturday night.

It would take another seven hours for the temperature to climb to a high of 42C and so, in the calm stillness, there was time to think of more than the glory and pain of heavyweight boxing. A few days earlier I had asked Dr Saeed bin Nasser al-Ghamdi if he still carried hope that his brother Mohammad bin Nasser al-Ghamdi, a retired schoolteacher, could be saved after he had been sentenced to death for a series of seemingly innocuous posts on social media.



‘Boxers must know the morality of supporting Saudi’ – gay exile Wajeeh Lion


“It is part of our Islamic religion not to despair and to submit to God’s will,” al-Ghamdi, a Saudi academic and political dissident now living in exile in Britain, told me. “If [execution] happens we are prepared.” Last week, too, when reflecting on her 29-year-old sister Manahel being jailed in Riyadh for 11 years by an anti-terrorism court, after being arrested for “her choice of clothing and support for women’s rights” in a series of online posts, Fawzia al-Otaibi told the Guardian that, when hearing the shattering news, “the world became dark before my eyes”.

Al-Otaibi, who also lives in political exile in Britain, added: “For the first time, I hated the fact that I was created a woman in my country. A country that had destroyed me and my family and turned our lives into an unbearable hell for the crime that we are women who want our right to life.”

During the 35 years I have written about boxing I have sometimes felt embarrassed by my lingering obsession with a business where men and women are paid to hurt each other. But the courage and skill, the resolve and resilience, of the best fighters is often inspirational and moving. It also helps that boxers are usually the friendliest and most open of all sportsmen and women when articulating their doubts and fears, hopes and dreams.
Manahel al-Otaibi walking in western clothes in the Saudi capital Riyadh in 2019. Photograph: Fayez Nureldine/AFP/Getty Images


These reflections now seem as redundant as they are romantic. It feels more urgent to try to understand how boxing is changing because of its lucrative and tangled relationship with the Saudis. When Saudi Arabia first began to show sustained interest in boxing it seemed natural to protest against the alliance between two such contrasting entities. Concern about state repression merged with despair of boxing’s residual chaos. Yet the unlikely partnership has sparked some surprising developments.

Turki Alalshikh, the chairman of the General Entertainment Authority that has vast resources in bankrolling these plans, is a serious and committed fan. He has the will and the economic might to force boxing to change. For too long bitter rivalries between promoters, and the greed of sanctioning bodies, had prevented the best fights from being made. The idea that Frank Warren and Eddie Hearn could be persuaded to talk to each other, and then engage enthusiastically in joint promotions, would have been dismissed as outlandish last year. Alalshikh smoothed away their feud, just as he ignored the IBF, WBA, WBC and WBO to produce a series of enticing and interesting fight cards. The most significant of these is the first world heavyweight title unification contest this century – between Fury and Usyk.

Alalshikh has also indicated a willingness to tackle boxing’s insidious problem with doping. Thomas Hauser, the esteemed boxing writer and Muhammad Ali’s biographer, wrote a feature in the Guardian that resembled an open letter to Alalshikh. Hauser urged him to leave a legacy in which he made “enormous strides in cleansing boxing of illegal performance enhancing drugs”.

The response from Alalshikh on X was positive. After thanking Hauser for his article he stressed that “I am ready to listen to all of your suggestions in the future”.

Yet, in Riyadh, I cannot shake thoughts of so many Saudi men and women who are either on death row or in prison for expressing their belief in freedom on social media. Last week, I spoke to Dana Ahmed of Amnesty International in Lebanon. Ahmed documents oppression in Saudi Arabia and, first, she acknowledged that “there have been positive steps to give women more freedom … but there is still a long way for Saudi Arabia to go when it comes to women’s rights”.

Ahmed said, up to January, Amnesty “has documented the cases of 69 individuals prosecuted solely for exercising their rights to freedom of expression in Saudi Arabia. At least 32 were prosecuted for peacefully expressing their opinions on social media. In light of fears of reprisals, people are afraid of reporting cases of prosecutions or interrogations for their expression publicly. Therefore, the number of such prosecutions is likely much higher.”

Turki Alalshikh (left), chairman of Saudi Arabia’s General Entertainment Authority, chats to José Mourinho during a fight in December. Photograph: Richard Pelham/Getty Images


The case of al-Otaibi is harrowing. When Mohammed bin Salman, the crown prince of Saudi Arabia, came to power in 2017, he was praised publicly by al-Otaibi who was already an activist for women’s rights. She proclaimed that, under Bin Salman, she felt free to dress and express herself how she liked. Her view soon darkened.

Sixteen months ago, al-Otaibi was charged on a number of “criminal” counts that included expressing support of women’s rights on social media and posting Snapchat photos of herself shopping while wearing dungarees rather than the traditional abaya. The situation worsened when the case was moved to a court specialising in terrorism-related offences.

Al-Otaibi’s fate only became known this month when Saudi officials confirmed to the UN that she had been sentenced to 11 years for “terrorist offences”. Her eldest sister, Maryam, who is serving a travel ban, lives in fear of her own arrest. Fawzia, the third al-Otaibi sister, fled Saudi after being asked to go alone to a prison in Riyadh in September 2022.

Oleksandr Usyk speaks to the media on Monday during the buildup to a fight that promises to unify boxing’s heavyweight division. Photograph: Nick Potts/PA

On 1 May, Fawzia al-Otabi, responding on X to her sister’s imprisonment, said: “Can you believe that they have imprisoned her, tortured her, broken her foot, terrorized her, and accused her of terrorism? Just because she is a woman advocating for women’s rights. Why have my rights become terrorism, and why is the world silent?”

Manahel al-Otaibi is being held in al-Malaz prison, less than 10 miles from the luxurious hotel where some of the key figures in the Fury-Usyk fight promotion are staying this week in Riyadh. The hotel is 40 miles from al-Ha’ir prison where Mohammad al-Ghamdi was incarcerated after he had been sentenced to death by the specialised criminal court on 10 July 2023. His brother told me last week that al-Ghamdi is now held at Dhahban prison in Jeddah. He was found guilty of terrorism for posts on two different X accounts. The first account had eight followers, while the second was followed by two people. While he was critical of the crown prince, most of his posts apparently focused on the need for economic reforms and complaints about rising prices and lengthening queues in supermarkets.

Mohammad bin Nasser al-Ghamdi, who is due to be executed in Saudi Arabia. Photograph: -

For Saeed al-Ghamdi, “the worst thing is that he was arrested for a few tweets, which were barely seen by the police officers, and they were tweets criticizing the increase in milk prices”.

The Guardian approached a representative of the Saudi Arabian government for comment but had not received a reply by the time of publication.

Asked to describe his brother before his arrest, Saeed al-Ghamdi said: “He was a very peaceful person who was generally unconcerned with the [political] situation because he was busy with his home, his family, and the illnesses that have accompanied him since his childhood.”

He added: “We hope that his health is fine, especially after he received a pillow and a quilt after a previous prisoner had left them in Dhahban prison. But he went through solitary confinement for several months, and medical neglect, with his family prevented from bringing him the bedding he needs. For rational, free people this is torture and so my brother was exposed to all of these things that violate human rights.”

Saeed al-Ghamdi is far more politically outspoken than his brother and he argues that “repression in Saudi Arabia has not diminished. It’s increasing. Manahel al-Otaibi was sentenced to 11 years in prison for charges that the authorities say are related to ‘terrorism’. Most of the peaceful detainees are charged with terrorism. The so-called terrorism law is written in a way that is not Islamically or legally correct because it is broad and vague.”


Tyson Fury’s father left bloodied after clash with member of Usyk’s entourage

Asked for his thoughts on the boxing this weekend, al-Ghamdi said: “If it happens that some of them [involved in the promotion] did not know about the oppressive situation of the regime, or were tempted by money, they can claim their humanity by abandoning the participation while they are in Saudi Arabia – or by publicly demanding that the state abolish the security trials and these imprisonments.”

Of course the undisputed heavyweight championship of the world will not be derailed by a sudden fit of political conscience. There is too much money and personal glory at stake. But, in the heat and tumult of fight week, the grim and mostly silent fate of Mohammad al-Ghamdi, Manahel al-Otaibi and other political prisoners in Saudi Arabia remains unchanged.

My Palestinian keffiyeh is a symbol of my identity. I should not be afraid to wear it in public

Tue 14 May 2024

I wear the traditional black and white scarf to celebrate my heritage. That’s enough to make you a target in the US today



What’s black and white and a threat all over? A keffiyeh, of course. It may look like a harmless piece of fabric, but it’s actually a weapon of mass distraction. According to an awful lot of anti-Palestinian voices, the mass graves and forced “full-blown famine” in parts of Gaza are not what you should be outraged about now. The thousands of dead children and calls for ethnic cleansing in Gaza are not what should be keeping you up at night. No, what should really upset you are people wearing keffiyehs – the traditional black and white scarf that has long been a symbol of Palestinian identity.

Being a British-Palestinian living in the US has never been a barrel of laughs. Anti-Arab bigotry has long been normalised in the US – although it’s hard to quantify the extent of this because the FBI did not properly track anti-Arab hate crimes between 1992 and 2015. Long before this current iteration of violence in Gaza, I’d grown used to people telling me Palestinians were terrorists while simultaneously proclaiming that “Palestinians don’t exist”: a phenomenon I’ve dubbed Schrödinger’s Palestinian.

Still, while the demonisation and erasure of Palestinians is nothing new, it feels like there’s now a concerted effort to outlaw any expression of Palestinian identity whatsoever: whether that be flags, keffiyehs, or watermelons. (Watermelons have become symbols of Palestine as a way to bypass attempts to censor the red, green, black and white Palestinian flag.) In March, for example, the Museum of Modern Art in New York denied entry to two people because one of them had a keffiyeh in their bag – after a public outcry, the museum later apologised and said it had mistaken the scarf for a banner. The Ontario legislature has banned people from wearing keffiyehs within the chamber. And, last week, the Eurovision song contest rebuked the Swedish-Palestinian singer Eric Saade for compromising the “non-political nature of the event” by wearing a keffiyeh around his wrist during his performance.

“I got that keffiyeh from my dad when I was a little boy, to never forget where the family comes from,” Saade later said on Instagram. “Back then I didn’t know that it would one day be called a ‘political symbol’.” Saade added: “I just wanted to … wear something that is authentic to me – but the EBU [the European Broadcasting Union] seems to think my ethnicity is controversial.”
Of course it’s controversial, Eric! You can’t get a cup of coffee as a Palestinian without someone making it controversial. You certainly can’t wear a traditional scarf. Back in 2007, when the keffiyeh had a moment as a mainstream fashion item, Urban Outfitters, which was marketing it as an anti-war scarf, stopped stocking it partly because of pressure from pro-Israel groups who smeared it as a terror symbol. At the time, a director of the pro-Israel group Stand With Us told the Jerusalem Post that she thought someone in Urban Outfitters’ buying department might have a “political agenda against Israel and Jews”. Now Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO of the Anti-Defamation League, is going one step further and trying to make keffiyehs synonymous with hate symbols. Last month he went on MSNBC’s show Morning Joe – one of Joe Biden’s favourite news programmes – and compared the keffiyeh to the Nazi swastika. The host, Joe Scarborough, didn’t push back on this outrageous comparison. Nor did the five other people on the news panel. Instead, the session was wrapped up and Scarborough told Greenblatt: “Thank you so much.”

Whipping up hatred against symbols of Palestinian identity has dangerous consequences. Last November three Palestinian college students in Burlington, Vermont were shot; it’s thought that they may have been targeted because they were wearing keffiyehs. Around the same time, a British-Indian man living in Brooklyn was attacked in a playground while with his 18-month-old, because he was wearing a keffiyeh. A woman called him a terrorist, threw her phone and a hot cup of coffee at him and said she hoped that “someone burns your child in an oven”.

Cowardly though it may be, the anti-Arab atmosphere in the US has made me afraid of wearing my own keffiyeh out of the house. Particularly, as I recently had a very unpleasant interaction when wearing my watermelon sweater (the same one Ben Affleck’s daughter was criticised for wearing). Still, being worried about getting harassed on the street is nothing compared with what people in Gaza and the West Bank are dealing with. Please don’t let hate-mongers try to distract you: it’s not keffiyehs or protesting university students that you should be outraged by, it’s children being starved to death.

Arwa Mahdawi is a Guardian columnist
India, gangs … or both? Who is behind assassinations of Canadian Sikhs?

Arrests in killing of Canadian Sikh activist offer glimpse of the nexus of underworld crime and alleged Indian hit squads



Leyland Cecco and Ahmar Khan in Toronto, 
THE GUARDIAN
Tue 14 May 2024 

Less than half an hour after the prominent Canadian Sikh activist Hardeep Singh Nijjar was shot dead outside a temple in British Columbia, Moninder Singh addressed a crowd near the site of the brazen attack.

“Make no mistake: this is a political assassination,” Singh told the agitated crowd in June 2023. “And it’s been carried out by India.”

Reaction from Delhi, more than 11,000 kilometres away, was starkly different. The government had long considered Nijjar a “terrorist” and Indian media wrote off the killing as a “fratricidal gang-world slaughter”.

In the months since, the two narratives – of an India-ordered assassination and an underworld hit – appeared at odds.


India says Canada has offered no evidence it was involved in death of Sikh separatist

But the recent arrest of three men for their alleged involvement in the killing of Nijjar has suggested that there is an element of truth to both of those claims. A fourth man, already in custody in the province of Ontario on firearms offences, was charged on Sunday.

The men are allegedly linked to a sprawling criminal network with operations in Canada. And with more arrests expected, investigators and government officials remain confident that India’s government used a tactic they claim it has often employed closer to home: using contract killers from a local gang to carry out a political assassination.

Charges against Karanpreet Singh, Kamalpreet Singh, Karan Brar and Amandeep Singh have done little to calm a lingering sense of fear within the Sikh community.

On a recent afternoon, devotees streaming into the Dixie Gurdwara in Mississauga, Ontario, were reluctant to speak on the record about Nijjar’s killing, but many said the issue loomed large over the community.

“Everyone, bro – everyone is talking about it, but we don’t want to say too much because of what the government can do,” said Jasdeep Singh, an international student from Punjab.

Nijjar was a vocal proponent of Khalistan, a potential independent Sikh state in India, and before his killing the activist had organised a series of symbolic referendums. The Khalistan movement is banned in India and India’s high commissioner to Canada, Sanjay Kumar Verma, recently accused pro-Khalistan activists in Canada of crossing “a big red line” that New Delhi sees as a matter of national security.

“Indians will decide the fate of India, not the foreigners,” he said.

For many Sikhs in Canada, Nijjar’s murder exposed the reach and ambition of India’s nationalist government, and its willingness to pursue and kill “terrorists” outside the country’s borders.

“It shows you the length to which this government is willing to go to shut down any level of dissent. They are even willing to work with enemies, people on the outs, have them go through the legal system – to attack us. It shows us that we’re doing something right,” said Mo Dhaliwal, a Sikh activist and the co-founder of the Poetic Justice Foundation.

View image in fullscreenKaran Brar appears by video link as members of the Sikh community attend court in Surrey, British Columbia, on 7 May in a courtroom sketch. Photograph: Felicity Don/Reuters

Indian intelligence has previously been accused of recruiting criminal gangs to carry out extrajudicial killings in Pakistan. Since 2020, Pakistan intelligence has accused India of carrying out up to 20 targeted murders of terrorists and dissidents hiding out in the country, with Pakistan intelligence reports alleging that Indian agencies often recruited criminal gangs and local gangsters to carry out these murders.

Canadian investigators believe the three men charged with Nijjar’s murder are low-level operatives of the Lawrence Bishnoi gang, a notorious group implicated in global extortion schemes. Bishnoi was jailed in 2014, but has reportedly been able to continue to conduct and expand his criminal empire from behind bars.


Canada: second Sikh activist’s house hit by gunfire this month

Bishnoi is believed to exert control over hundreds of members across north India in recent years and, with operations in North America, exert influence through the sizable Punjabi diaspora.

The gang has been implicated in several high-profile crimes, including the 2022 killing of the popular Canadian Punjabi singer Sidhu Moose Wala.

Investigations by Indian police into the Bishnoi gang’s operations found members were often recruited through social media, where gang leaders post images of weapons and piles of cash, glorifying the gangster life. Punjab police also found that young men were often being recruited by being promised a “new life” in Canada.

Street gangs and organised crime syndicates with links to south Asian communities have long had a presence in British Columbia and Ontario and the Indian government’s decision to use those existing networks is a “marriage of convenience”, said Queen’s University assistant professor Amarnath Amarasingam, who specialises in extremism and social movements.

“India will pay whoever will do the shooting and gangs like the Bishnoi gang will essentially kill whoever pays them to kill,” he said.

Canadian investigators are also probing whether the three men were involved in three other homicides – including the shooting of an 11-year-old boy in the city of Edmonton, where the men were arrested.

Using a gang based in the Punjab, whose members arrived on student visas, would be intended to create the perception of domestic score-settling and administrative oversight, instead of a government-ordered assassination, said Amarasingam.

While it remains unclear whether the Bishnoi gang itself outsourced the killing of Nijjar – or how high the orders came from within the Indian government – the strategy has proven successful outside India’s direct borders.

“At this point, for broader political and economic reasons, there doesn’t seem to be any consequences for the people who kind of call the shots at all,” said Amarasingam.

Nearly a year after Nijjar’s death, mounting pressure within Canada to mend relations and restore trade talks with India has angered activist Gurpatwant Singh Pannun.

US prosecutors say that Pannun, the chief legal counsel for Sikhs for Justice, was the target of a foiled assassination attempt overseen by an unnamed Indian government agent who directed a middleman to recruit a hitman in the US, where Pannun lives. Pannun argues that Canada must do more to confront an increasingly aggressive India.

“The use of gangs as foot soldiers has India’s fingerprints all over it,” he said. “But arresting lower-level players and removing intelligence agents isn’t enough to end the transnational campaign of violence. Indian diplomats must also be held accountable, otherwise [Indian prime minister Narendra] Modi’s government will feel they can come to Canada, kill a Canadian and get away with it.”

After the arrests of the three men in Canada, India’s foreign minister reiterated his government’s belief that Ottawa is allowing criminals to operate in Canada.

“Somebody may have been arrested; the police may have done some investigation. But the fact is [a] number of gangland people, [a] number of people with organised crime links from Punjab, have been made welcome in Canada,” said the foreign minister, Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, adding that Canada had also given shelter to pro-Khalistan activists. “These are wanted criminals from India; you have given them visas … and yet you allow them to live there.”

For Moninder Singh, the use of existing criminal networks to attack the Khalistan movement is a “new reality” for activists.

“When I look at these three individuals, I only see India,” he said. “They’re just faces: three were hired today and another three could be hired tomorrow.”

A year before his friend was murdered, Singh – a spokesperson for the British Columbia Gurdwaras Council – was also warned about a possible attempt on his life. He was recently warned again by police of a “very real” risk of assassination, but remains undeterred.

He avoids public places when possible. He has stopped grocery shopping. And he cannot attend key moments of his children’s lives.

“You make up excuses – ‘Dad’s gonna go to work’ or ‘Dad’s gonna go for his community meeting right now and can’t come to your recital.’ And then after a while, your kids stop asking, because they know you won’t be there. That’s the hardest and the saddest part of this whole thing,” he said.

“I made the choice to speak out for Khalistan and I don’t want sympathy. It’s an unfortunate thing to have to accept living in a country like Canada, where this stuff shouldn’t happen. But I’ve chosen this path and I’m committed to it. I’ll either see Khalistan or I’ll die trying.”
Niger’s prime minister blames US for rupture of military pact


Ali Mahaman Lamine Zeine says in interview that US troops ‘stayed on our soil, doing nothing while terrorists killed people’



Edward Helmore
Tue 14 May 2024 
THE GUARDIAN

Ali Mahaman Lamine Zeine, Niger’s prime minister, has blamed the US for a rupture in an important military pact between the two countries that allows US forces to station in the west African nation.

In an interview with the Washington Post, Zeine said US officials had attempted to dictate which countries Niger could align with, had failed to justify the presence of US troops in the country while “doing nothing” to counter an Islamist insurgency in the region.

“The Americans stayed on our soil, doing nothing while the terrorists killed people and burned towns,” Zeine told the Post. “It is not a sign of friendship to come on our soil but let the terrorists attack us. We have seen what the United States will do to defend its allies, because we have seen Ukraine and Israel.”


US confirms Russian forces deployed to same Niger airbase as American troops


Last year, a military coup d’état ousted Niger’s democratically elected president, Mohamed Bazoum. Washington then froze security support and paused counter-terrorism activities run out of Air Base 201, where the US conducts drone surveillance of the Islamic State and al-Qaida-affiliated groups in the Sahel and stationed more than 1,000 military personnel.

Last month, the US acted on Niger’s demands that US troops leave and agreed to withdraw its forces.

The cancellation of the US-Niger security pact has stirred fears of a loss of US influence and a replacement by Russian power in west Africa. Neighboring Burkina Faso and Mali, where Russia’s Wagner mercenary group has established a presence, are already considered to be close to Moscow.

After last July’s coup in Niger and before his assassination in August, the Wagner group leader, Yevgeny Prigozhin, issued a statement welcoming the new military government and offering it Wagner’s services.

US diplomats and military officials made a counter-offer designed to keep cooperation in place, but Russia has dispatched troops to the capital, Niamey. Russian and US troops now occupy opposite ends of an airbase.

In his interview with the Post, Zeine revealed the extent of the breakdown in US-Niger relations.


Zeine said leaders of Niger’s new government, known as the National Council for Safeguarding the Homeland, or CNSP, were unhappy that the US had frozen military support but kept US troops in the country.

Gen Michael Langley, head of the US Africa Command, told a Senate armed services committee meeting in March that while the US was no longer conducting counter-terrorism operations from Niger, a US military presence in the region was necessary to counter Russian encroachment.

“I’d say that a number of countries are at the tipping point of actually being captured by the Russian Federation as they are spreading some of their false narratives across Libya,” he said. “At [an] accelerated pace, [the] Russian Federation is really trying to take over central Africa, as well as the Sahel.”

Zeine said that the US response to Niger’s coup contrasted with responses from Russia, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates that had welcomed the new leadership in Niamey with “open arms”.

“Nigeriens were saying, ‘Americans are our friends, they will help us this time to annihilate the terrorists.’ But there was radio silence,” Zeine told the newspaper, adding that Niger would have not looked to Russia for help if the US had responded to requests for more support, including for planes, drones and air defense systems.

But he also said he had told the US delegation that Niger still desired economic and diplomatic relations with the US. “If American investors arrived, we would give them what they wanted. We have uranium. We have oil. We have lithium. Come, invest. It is all we want.”

Zeine told the Post he took offense at remarks by Molly Phee, assistant secretary of state for African affairs, who he said had directed Niger to resist engaging with Russia and Iran if it wanted to continue its security relationship with the US and threatened sanctions if Niger pursued a deal to sell uranium to Iran. Zeine said that “absolutely nothing” has been signed with Iran.

The Niger leader said he had told Phee that she had “come here to threaten us in our country. That is unacceptable. And you have come here to tell us with whom we can have relationships, which is also unacceptable. And you have done it all with a condescending tone and a lack of respect.”

In a response, a US official told the Washington Post that the message relayed to Niamey was “delivered in a professional manner, in response to valid concerns about developments”.
‘Impunity is growing’: French celebrities call for law to crack down on sexism and sexual violence

Writers, actors, journalists and politicians published petition in Le Monde after learning 94% of complaints were dismissed in 2022



Angelique Chrisafis in Paris
Tue 14 May 2024 
THE GUARDIAN


More than 140 French public figures from literature, film, journalism and politics are calling for the introduction of a wide-ranging law against sexist and sexual violence in France, saying the country has failed to adequately respond to the #MeToo movement.

Personalities including the bestselling writers Camille Kouchner, Leïla Slimani and Vanessa Springora as well as the actors Juliette Binoche, Isabelle Adjani, Emmanuelle Béart and the actor-director Judith Godrèche, told Le Monde: “Despite the courage of victims, impunity is growing.”


Judith Godrèche calls out French film industry’s sexual violence before parliament


In a petition, published in Le Monde, they said France is “abysmally” lagging behind in terms of the reaction of society and the legal system to the pervasive problem of sexist and sexual abuse. “It’s unacceptable that the rate of dismissals of complaints of sexual violence reached the delirious rate of 94% in 2022,” the petition said.

They called for a far-reaching rethink of policy on rape and sexual assault in France.

The petition said: “We demand an all-encompassing law to clarify, among other things, the definitions of ‘rape’ and ‘consent,’ to introduce the term ‘incest,’ to try serial rapists for all known rapes, to extend protection orders to rape victims, to facilitate the gathering of evidence, to create specialised police units, to prohibit investigations into victims’ sexual histories, to allow immediate and free access to psychological trauma care, to finally provide the financial means for this public policy and the organisations that implement it.”

In an unprecedented move, 100 of the signatories – including Binoche, Godrèche, the actor Vahina Giocante and the writer Christine Angot – posed for a series of group photographs in Le Monde.

The actor Anna Mouglalis, who had the idea for the photo, said she wanted to take action after seeing that the proportion of rape accusations that were dismissed in France rose from 86% in 2016 to 94% in 2022.

“While the fight against sexual and sexist violence is supposed to be the major cause of Emmanuel Macron’s presidency, in reality impunity continues to grow,” she told Le Monde. She said it was not just a case of a single profession being affected, but of “systematic violence running through the whole of French society”.

The manifesto was published on the first day of the Cannes film festival, and as the French film industry is coming to terms with recent allegations of rape and sexual assault. A short film by Godrèche entitled Moi Aussi, or Me Too, highlighting the stories of survivors of sexual violence, will premiere at the festival.

Godrèche has become a leading voice in France’s #MeToo movement after accusing the directors Benoît Jacquot and Jacques Doillon of sexually assaulting her while she was a teenager. Both men have denied the allegations. Prosecutors have launched an inquiry.

Gérard Depardieu, one of France’s best-known actors, will face a criminal trial in October over the alleged sexual assaults of two women on the set of a film in 2021. He is also under formal investigation in another case after the actor Charlotte Arnould alleged he raped her at his Paris home in 2018. He has denied all allegations.

On Monday, the French magazine Elle published allegations of rape, assault and sexual harassment by nine women against the influential French film producer Alain Sarde, who has produced films by directors from Jean-Luc Godard to Roman Polanski. In a statement to French media, Sarde’s lawyer denied all allegations.
Police fire teargas at protesters and MPs brawl as Georgia passes ‘foreign agents’ bill
View image in fullscreenTens of thousands of people protested in Tbilisi against a bill that has been seen as an impediment to Georgia’s EU ascension. Photograph: Giorgi Arjevanidze/AFP/Getty Images

Vote to adopt bill a ‘serious obstacle’ to Georgia’s bid to join EU, European Commission warns


Daniel Boffey in Tbilisi
THE GUARDIAN
Tue 14 May 2024 
Georgia protests – latest updates


Riot police have used teargas in an attempt to disperse protesters outside Georgia’s parliament while MPs brawled inside, as a “foreign agents” bill was passed into law.

The bill – condemned as a Kremlin-inspired act of repression – was backed by 84 MPs to 30 despite western pressure and the rolling protests that have brought hundreds of thousands of people on to the streets of the capital, Tbilisi.


A number of protesters were treated by medics after teargas was used on a noisy but seemingly peaceful crowd of a few thousand people, while squads of police dragged individuals away.

The violence spread into the chamber, with a dozen MPs fighting and one MP, from the governing Georgian Dream party, being held back by security guards as he violently lurched at the chair of the main opposition, Levan Khabeishvili.

The police were initially successful in clearing the crowds from Rustaveli Avenue in front of the imposing parliament building but the officers soon retreated to whistles and jeers as the demonstration grew in the early evening.

A rendition of the national anthem, Tavisupleba, or Freedom, was sung by the many tens of thousands braving the rain followed by the playing on a tannoy of Beethoven’s Ode to Joy, also known as the anthem of Europe.

Lithuania’s president, Gitanas Nausėda, issued a statement of solidarity as what appeared to be the largest crowd since the government introduced the controversial bill in March gathered to protest.

“Dear Georgian people,” Nausėda’s statement said, “we hear you and stand with you in your struggle for the European future of Georgia. Nobody has the right to take your European dream away. Nobody has the right to silence the will of the people to live by values.”
Clashes at Georgian parliament as 'foreign agents bill' passes – video

Under the legislation adopted on Tuesday, media or civil society groups in Georgia that receive more than 20% of their funding from abroad will have to register as “organisations serving the interests of a foreign power”.



The US state department has called the bill “Kremlin-inspired”, as it has echoes of legislation introduced into the Russian statute books in 2012 by Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, which many people say has been used to silence critics.

The president of Georgia, Salome Zourabichvili, has said she would veto the law, but the governing party has sufficient numbers in parliament to overrule her.

Georgia’s prime minister, Irakli Kobakhidze, earlier on Tuesday met the US assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs, Jim O’Brien, in Tbilisi to discuss Washington’s concerns.

The prime minister’s office said Kobakhidze had explained to O’Brien the “need to adopt the law” and reiterated the “readiness of the leadership team to carefully consider all legal comments of international partners within the framework of the veto procedure”.

Kobakhidze said on Monday that O’Brien had also requested a meeting with the billionaire oligarch Bidzina Ivanishvili, the honorary chair of the ruling Georgian Dream party, who is widely thought to drive government policy.

He said Ivanishvili – who made his fortune in Russia – rejected the request on the grounds that the US had frozen $2bn (£1.59bn) of his funds.

Georgian Dream is accused of unwinding the progress made since the 2003 Rose revolution, when a non-violent movement brought an end to an administration that was Soviet in style and corrupt in practice.

The party was elected 12 years ago after those who drove the changes in Georgian politics in the early 2000s were blamed for antagonising Russia, leading to an invasion and full-scale war in 2008.


The European Commission on Tuesday restated its position that the new law would undermine Georgia’s application to join the European Union. “EU member countries are very clear that if this law is adopted it will be a serious obstacle for Georgia in its European perspective,” it said.


Tina Bokuchava, the parliamentary leader of the opposition United National Movement said: “Today’s vote will focus minds on the urgent need for regime change in Georgia. With elections to look forward to in October, I am confident that the unity seen on our streets in recent weeks will prove a watershed moment in our nation’s history.

“Our rightful place is in Europe – but the Ivanishvili stranglehold must be broken first if this dream is to be realised.”

On Monday, students from 30 Georgian universities joined the protests and went on strike, backed by lecturers.

Irakli Beradze, 22, a student in Tblisi, holding up a sign saying “Russia can’t gaslight us, we have gas masks”, said that he and thousands of others “would not let Russia have our country”.

But in a speech on Tuesday, a Georgian Dream MP, Archil Talakvadze, called critics of the new law a “radical and anti-national political opposition united by political vendetta”.

“But nothing and nobody can stop the development of our country,” he added.