Tuesday, June 03, 2025

 

A prolific discovery: three new orchid species endemic to Costa Rica and Panama




Pensoft Publishers
Pleurothallis winkeliana flower and prolific growth. 

image: 

Pleurothallis winkeliana flower and prolific growth.

view more 

Credit: Karremans et al.





Three new orchid species from the genus Pleurothallis have been discovered in the cloud forests of Costa Rica and western Panama, each utilising an unusual method of asexual reproduction known as prolification.

Found in the cool, misty highlands of the Talamanca range at elevations between 1400 and 2550 metres, the newly discovered species, Pleurothallis matrisilvaePleurothallis pridgeoniana and Pleurothallis winkeliana are described in the open-access journal PhytoKeys

Prolification is a phenomenon by which plants produce miniature plantlets directly from their flowering stems, allowing them to bypass seed production and spread through vegetative means.

Whilst prolification is rarely a fixed feature within this group of orchids, it becomes common under stressful environmental conditions. The ability may be advantageous in the challenging conditions of cloud forests, but remains underexplored scientifically. Methods of asexual reproduction might also be important when pollinators are scarce.

The three new species, endemic to the mountains Costa Rica and western Panama, are each uniquely adapted and exhibit prolification in different ways, such as forming long chains or bushy growths. These adaptations helped researchers identify them as distinct species, despite their initial visual similarities with other plants. 

With close to 1700 species currently recorded, a third of which are not known to grow anywhere else in the world, Costa Rica is a well-known orchid biodiversity hotspot. The discovery of these orchids displays the Talamanca range’s significance as a rich and largely unexplored area. 

With these additions, Costa Rica now boasts 67 recognised species of Pleurothallis, though researchers believe many more await formal identification. Such abundance highlights the importance of conserving these unique ecosystems.

Thanks to Costa Rica’s robust system of protected areas (SINAC), local institutions such as Lankester Botanical Garden of the University of Costa Rica are able to uncover and describe floristic novelties in an effort to study and conserve the country’s unique biodiversity.

Original source

Karremans AP, Pupulin F, Gange J, Bogarín D (2025) Three new species of Pleurothallis (Orchidaceae) from Costa Rica and Panama, with a note on asexual reproduction by prolification in Pleurothallidinae. PhytoKeys 256: 197-220. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.256.140316

 

The heart of female elite athletes adapts differently than those of male elite athletes




Amsterdam University Medical Center





Intensive exercise- and sport changes the heart of an athlete. Research led by Amsterdam UMC shows that the hearts of female athletes have different characteristics than those of male athletes. Whereas a thickening in combination with a dilation of the heart muscle is characteristic in male top athletes, dilation of the heart chambers is mainly seen in female elite athletes. An important observation that can help doctors to better distinguish between normal sports-related changes and possible heart disease in female athletes. These results were published today in European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging. 

Difference Between Men and Women 
Despite the growing attention for biological differences between men and women in healthcare, women are still often underexposed in medical research. Harald Jorstad, sports cardiologist at Amsterdam UMC: "Women are still underrepresented in heart research, especially when it comes to sports cardiology research. But through our collaboration with the Dutch Olympic team, we have now also been able to gain knowledge from female elite athletes about adaptations in the morphology of the heart."  

Knowing what is normal 
With an MRI scan, the hearts of 173 female elite athletes were analysed down to the tissue level. Their hearts were compared to data from women who do not participate in professional sport. "We saw that in women who participate in professional sports, the heart chambers in particular become wider, while the heart muscle thickens only to a limited extent, and the heart tissue otherwise contains normal characteristics. This is different from a male athlete's heart: the heart muscle is frequently thicker than the heart muscle of a 'normal' heart. A characteristic that you also see in heart disease," says Jorstad. A thickened heart muscle is therefore to be expected in male elite athletes, while it is not normal in female elite athletes, and in females could indicate heart disease. "That is why it is important that we know from both men and women how the heart adapts through sport, and we know what is normal in an athlete," says Jorstad. 

Differences in type of sport 
Not only are there differences between men and women in how the heart adapts, but there is also a difference between different types of athletes. Maarten van Diepen, physician-researcher in sports cardiology at Amsterdam UMC: "Female endurance athletes, such as cyclists, had the largest heart chambers and the most heart muscle mass; more than strength athletes such as gymnasts. This shows that the way in which the heart of elite female athlete adapts also depends on the type of training load." 

Better guidance and protection of athletes 
This research underlines the importance of including not only sports history but also biological sex when assessing the heart of an elite or highly active recreational athlete. "This prevents heart disease in women from being overlooked. Or the other way around, that a healthy female athlete's heart is wrongly labeled as sick and the woman, for example, must stop with professional sport. More knowledge about the female athlete's heart helps doctors to better determine whether a heart is undergoing normal sports-related changes or whether further research into a possible heart disease is needed. This can ultimately help to better guide and protect female athletes, from professional to recreational, against heart problems," says Jorstad. 

 

The ”immune system” of a safe and equal Europe is in danger, according to researchers


Association of ERC Grantees
AERG logo 

image: 

The AERG logo

view more 

Credit: AERG





The Association of ERC Grantees (AERG) expresses grave concern over the future of fundamental research in Europe. It released a statement in which it urges European leaders to protect fundamental science by increasing the autonomy of the European Research Council (ERC). Current discussions of the successor framework programme to Horizon Europe suggest it will be “tightly connected” to a European Competitiveness Fund.

This greatly endangers the ERC’s autonomy and thus its mission.

As behavioural scientist  Karin Roelofs, professor of experimental psychopathology at Radboud University in Nijmegen (The Netherlands) and vice president of AERG puts it, “Fundamental research is the immune system of a healthy, safe and equal society. While it may sound counterintuitive, fundamental, curiosity-driven research often leads to more breakthroughs than planned programmatic research. If the two compete within a single Competitiveness Fund, programmatic research will inevitably have the upper hand, because the more intuitive narrative of concretely planned research is easier to sell".

Cognitive psychologist Axel Cleeremans, research director of the Belgian Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique and President of AERG, adds: “This poses a serious threat to fundamental research, particularly within the current political climate. The European Commission is discussing  the future of the ERC right now.  European leaders must urgently protect the autonomy of the ERC by any means.

Follows the full text of the statement:


The Association of ERC Grantees (AERG) urges European leaders to enhance the autonomy and the funding of the European Research Council to secure European competitiveness
Brussels — 2 June 2025 – The Association of ERC Grantees calls on European leaders to increase the autonomy and funding of the core EU agency supporting fundamental research - the European Research Council (ERC). Current discussions of the successor framework programme to Horizon Europe suggest it will be “tightly connected” to a European Competitiveness Fund. This greatly endangers the ERC’s unique position as a pan-European funder, one that is independent of any national and European political agenda and dedicated solely to scientific excellence.

Since 2007, the ERC has funded over 14K individuals to lead frontier research projects throughout Europe. Their work has created new knowledge, transformed lives, and spurred innovation in Europe. It has led to over 2200 patents (and other Intellectual Property Rights applications), over 400 spin-off companies, and no less than 14 ERC awardees have received a Nobel Prize. Commission President von der Leyen called the ERC “the crown jewel of the Horizon Europe framework programme” (Speech by President von der Leyen at the 70th anniversary of CERN, October 1, 2024: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/speech_24_4982).

Continuation of this success story can only be guaranteed by 1) enhancing the ERC’s autonomy and 2) increasing its budget (See our statement "AERG Fully Supports the ERC Scientific Council's Call for a "Doubling of Spending on Research and Innovation" https://aerg.eu/news/the-aerg-fully-supports-the-erc-scientific-council-s-call-for-a-doubling-of-spending-on-research-and-innovation).

Autonomy is key: The ERC must be a stand-alone body with a dedicated permanent legal and institutional basis, to make it optimally functional for the next twenty years. Budget growth is particularly needed to keep up with a changing world in which bottom-up, excellence-based research is under threat.

The Association of ERC Grantees believes that the best and brightest minds in Europe will always contribute to shaping the future of Europe through their ideas, innovations, and applications. To do so, they need intellectual freedom, a research landscape that ensures quality and rigor, and the resources to support their work.

The ERC has played a key role in providing all these enabling factors, and it must continue to be led by scientists, for the common good. Fundamental curiosity-driven research provides the breakthroughs of tomorrow, and is therefore an essential pre-requisite for true competitiveness. Planned programmatic research also, of course, has its place. However, it is crucial to recognise the distinct and complementary natures of these two forms of research. If both types of research compete for resources within a single fund, the importance and organisation of fundamental
research risks being re-negotiated over and over again. This is a danger zone for any advanced society, because it shifts the focus to incremental rather than transformative impacts.
Now is the moment to update the ERC’s legal and operational structure, to strengthen it for the future and to guarantee its continued contribution to Europe’s competitiveness. The autonomy that the agency was granted in 2007 should be extended by establishing the ERC with its own governance, so ensuring its permanence as a stand-alone EU body. This is essential to implement is scientific strategy. Increasing its funding is essential to keep Europe’s top scientists and to be a magnet for talent from elsewhere. At this point, 40% of applicants to ERC calls are
rejected not because of a lack of excellence, but simply because there is no budget to fund them. This is a missed chance for Europe. The ERC represents a crucial investment in Europe’s future. An autonomous and well-funded ERC will continue to make an outstanding contribution to European competitiveness and quality of life, by transforming the breakthrough ideas of today into the innovative products, policies and systems of tomorrow.

We strongly urge all European leaders to demonstrate their commitment to fundamental research in Europe when discussing the successor framework programme to Horizon Europe. It is essential to enable scientists to continue delivering their groundbreaking contributions to societal progress. The best way for them to do so is to enhance the autonomy and the funding of the ERC.

NOTE FOR THE EDITORS
The Association of ERC Grantees (AERG) is an international non-profit organization established under Belgian law to represent the community of researchers awarded grants by the European Research Council (ERC). AERG supports and promotes excellence-based, bottom-up scientific research across Europe. Its core missions include fostering a vibrant research community, engaging the public on the value of fundamental research, and advocating for frontier science funding. Through networking, outreach, and policy engagement, the Association highlights the societal impact of high-risk, high-reward research and works to ensure diversity and quality in future ERC applications. AERG has around 250 members as of today. representing 21 countries (UK, FR, DE, NL, SP, IT, BE, CH, SW, AT, PT, GR, IL, IR, FI, DK, ND, PL, TU, SL, CZ).

For more information visit: https://aerg.eu


Chinese Team develops multi-dimensional framework to assess sustainable development


Ecosystem Health and Sustainability

The location of Huzhou (a), the land use in 2022 (b) and GDP in 2020 (c). 

image: 

Huzhou includes five districts and counties, each with distinct development characteristics: Anji County, characterized by a low economic level but a high forest coverage; Wuxing District has high economic development, a large proportion of built-up areas and a dense population, but fewer green resources; and the other three districts that maintain a balance between GDP and green coverage.

view more 

Credit: Yunting Xiong, Xiamen University





In 2015 the United Nations adopted Sustainable Development Goals that are related to social welfare, social equity, and environmental protection. They set a target of reaching these goals by 2030. Since the goals were proposed, China has implemented a wide range of strategies to achieve these goals. A research team, led by Professor Yonglong Lu, has developed a multi-dimensional framework and then used that framework to evaluate Huzhou city’s sustainable development from 2003 to 2022.

The research findings are published in the journal Ecosystem Health and Sustainability on May 12, 2025.

Sustainable development refers to a state of harmony between humans and nature. It describes responsible development that meets the needs of people both today and in future generations. Since the UN proposed the Sustainable Development Goals, most studies related to the goals have focused primarily on national and provincial levels. The dynamic changes and unique challenges at the local level have been mostly overlooked. There is a need for multi-dimensional evaluation systems that can account for regional characteristics and help pinpoint priorities for effective policy interventions.

“The purpose of this study was to build a city-scale sustainable development evaluation framework to assess the indicators of key areas of regional development. Based on this framework, a quantitative analysis of the interactions between multiple dimensions was conducted to accurately identify the key factors restricting local sustainable development,” said Yonglong Lu, a professor at Xiamen University.

The research team’s multi-dimensional evaluation framework consists of four primary dimensions – green economy, social progress, ecological environment, and innovative technology. This framework was an upgrade from the traditional three-dimensional system of “society-economy-environment.” The team further divided the four main dimensions into 16 secondary dimensions and 80 specific indicators. Then they used their framework to conduct a detailed evaluation of Huzhou’s sustainable development from 2003 to 2022. They found notable improvements in all the dimensions since 2003, with the greatest progress occurring in innovative technology.

The team used the network analysis method to reveal the synergy and trade-off relationship among dimensions to identify the priority areas of policy actions. Based on the multi-dimensional evaluation, they proposed the feasible path of multi-dimensional collaborative development for the dimensions with slower progress. This is a breakthrough from the traditional three pillars of ‘social, economic, and environmental dimensions,’ as technology innovation has taken a leading role in promoting the sustainable development and will take a more important role in the future.

The team chose Huzhou city for the case study area because it has made remarkable achievements in terms of green finance, circular economy, and low-carbon governance, accumulating abundant experience in green development. Huzhou is also famous for its abundant ecological resources and has made great efforts in green technology innovation and big data platform construction. Its experience provides valuable insights into regional sustainable development and serves as an ideal case for researching the Sustainable Development Goals.

The team’s city-scale sustainable development evaluation framework assessed the indicators of key areas of regional development in Huzhou. Their study not only provides scientific support for the sustainable development of Huzhou city, but also offers insights for sustainable development practices in other regions.

While synergies outweighed trade-offs in most secondary dimensions, the team identified significant trade-offs between air quality and green space construction. “This study provides a practical framework for evaluating the delivery of Sustainable Development Goals and identifying priority aspects to accelerate sustainable development at a city level,” said Lu.

Looking ahead, the research team sees the need to focus future research on the prediction and analysis of risk dynamics and development scenarios in order to provide accurate suggestions for the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals. “Our ultimate goal is to provide effective science-based suggestions for the delivery of Sustainable Development Goals with reduced risks or without any risks,” said Lu.

The research team includes Yunting Xiong, Kongming Li, Qi Wang, Zhenjun Zhang, Bin Sun, and Jingjing Yuan from Xiamen University, Fujian, China, and Yonglong Lu from Xiamen University and the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

This research is funded by the National Key R &D Program, the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the International Partnership Program by the Chinese Academy of Sciences.


The illustration depicts the four primary dimensions and the 16 secondary dimensions aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals; shows the flow of weights between dimensions and the Sustainable Development Goals.

(a) Green Economy; (b) Social Progress; (c) Ecological Environment; (d) Innovative Technology. The histogram represents the scores of the primary dimensions, and the value refers to the left coordinate axis. The line chart represents the scores of the secondary dimensions, and the value refers to the right coordinate axis.

Credit

Yunting Xiong, Xiamen University

 

Does a culturally tailored quality of life intervention benefit Latina breast cancer survivors and caregivers?


Clinical trial results point to the potential of this strategy to lessen survivors’ anxiety and fatigue.



Wiley





A recent randomized controlled trial assessed the benefits of a group-based intervention that fosters communication and coping skills in a culturally tailored way for Latina breast cancer survivors and their caregivers. The results are published by Wiley online in CANCER, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Cancer Society.

For the trial, investigators randomized 136 Latina breast cancer survivors and 136 caregivers from Washington, D.C., New York, NY, and San Jose, CA, to participate in an 8-session coping and communication intervention that reflects the cultural preferences and values of Latina/o people (70 pairs) or to receive usual care support services through community-based organizations (66 pairs). The intervention was developed by Nueva Vida, Inc., a community-based organization in Washington D.C., and the study was funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.

Among the patient-caregiver pairs in the intervention group, 71.4% attended at least 5 of the 8 sessions, demonstrating high engagement, with 82% of participants still in the program at 6 months. There were clinically significant improvements in breast cancer survivors’ reports of anxiety and fatigue at 6 months after the intervention compared with reports by breast cancer survivors who used usual community resources; however, after adjusting for potentially influencing factors, the results were not statistically significant.

“Our close collaboration with 4 exceptional community-based organizations for this trial led to our success with recruitment and retention of Latina breast cancer survivors and their caregivers. Future research can seek to replicate our intervention and evaluate the intervention with other groups of breast cancer survivors and their caregivers,” said senior author Kristi D. Graves, PhD, of Georgetown University.

 

Additional information
NOTE: The information contained in this release is protected by copyright. Please include journal attribution in all coverage. A free abstract of this article will be available via the CANCER Newsroom upon online publication. For more information or to obtain a PDF of any study, please contact: Sara Henning-Stout, newsroom@wiley.com

Full Citation:
“Randomized Trial of a Community-Based, Culturally Tailored Intervention: High Engagement Among Latina Breast Cancer Survivors.” Katarina AuBuchon, Claudia Campos Galvan, Ysabel Duron, Ivis Sampayo, Migdalia Torres, Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza, Charlene Kuo, Christina Rush, Maria Gloria Elliott, Jennie Santiago, Laura A. Logie, Astrid Jimenez, George Luta, and Kristi D. Graves. CANCER; Published Online: June 2, 2025 (DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35842).  

URL Upon Publication: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/cncr.35842

Author Contact: Karen Teber, Associate Vice President, Strategic Communications, at km463@georgetown.edu, for Georgetown University Medical Center. Laura Logie, PhD, Director of Research, for Nueva Vida, Inc.: research@nueva-vida.org

About the Journal     
CANCER is a peer-reviewed publication of the American Cancer Society integrating scientific information from worldwide sources for all oncologic specialties. The objective of CANCER is to provide an interdisciplinary forum for the exchange of information among oncologic disciplines concerned with the etiology, course, and treatment of human cancer. CANCER is published on behalf of the American Cancer Society by Wiley and can be accessed online. Follow CANCER on X @JournalCancer and Instagram @ACSJournalCancer, and stay up to date with the American Cancer Society Journals on LinkedIn.

About Wiley      
Wiley is one of the world’s largest publishers and a trusted leader in research and learning. Our industry-leading content, services, platforms, and knowledge networks are tailored to meet the evolving needs of our customers and partners, including researchers, students, instructors, professionals, institutions, and corporations. We empower knowledge-seekers to transform today’s biggest obstacles into tomorrow’s brightest opportunities. For more than two centuries, Wiley has been delivering on its timeless mission to unlock human potential. Visit us at Wiley.com. Follow us on FacebookXLinkedIn and Instagram.