Sunday, November 09, 2025

US Democratic lawmaker criticizes ex-president Biden for mishandling Gaza conflict

November 8, 2025 


Rep. Ro Khanna (R-CA) [Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images]

US Congressman Ro Khanna on Thursday criticized former President Joe Biden’s handling of Gaza and called for a major shift in US policy toward Israel and Palestine, Anadolu reports.

“We have to start with the truth. President Biden mishandled Gaza. He was wrong. We should never have given a blank check,” US Congressman Ro Khanna said at an event in Washington, DC.

“There were 37 Democrats who voted against the $14 billion aid to (Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu. That should have been every person in the Democratic caucus.”

“Those who voted for that aid made as much of a blunder as those who supported the war in Iraq,” he affirmed.

Urging the Congress to halt arms sales to Israel, he said: “We need to say no military sales to Israel and Netanyahu, and get on Delia Ramirez’s no bombs act.”

The act, led by Illinois Rep. Delia Ramirez, focuses on the most destructive weapons systems used in Gaza and demands that the US halt arms transfers to Israel amid its genocide in the enclave.

Khanna also called for recognition of international law, saying: “We need to say that we will recognize what the UN, what the ICJ (International Court of Justice) is, recognizing that what happened, there was a genocide.”

“We need to say very clearly that the United States should follow 150 other countries and recognize Palestinian self-determination and a Palestinian state with a secure Israel,” he stressed.

Expressing the frustration of young Americans, he said: “Here is what I know. You may disagree with where I stand, but young people are tired of the platitudes. They’re tired of people saying, ‘We want peace, we want justice, we want human rights.’ What does that mean? Where do you stand? Where do you stand? Specifically, enough of the word salads, enough of the platitudes.”

“We need to be a party of moral courage,” he said.

The Corporate ‘Moderates’ Had Their Chance—They Blew It

WALL ST DEMS ARE THE NEW GOP

The moderate establishment looks at this moment and offers more of what created it. More of the same kind of visionless hopeless feckless Democrats, ready to dampen hope and block transformation at every turn. Let’s offer what voters are actually asking for: a nation and an economy that work for them.


Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) speaks during a news conference with then Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) following an announced end to the partial government shutdown at the U.S. Capitol January 25, 2019 in Washington, DC.
(Photo by Zach Gibson/Getty Images)

Corbin Trent
Nov 09, 2025
Common Dreams


Every few years—throughout my entire adult life—I’ve watched the same cycle repeat. Democrats lose ground. The party panics. And like clockwork, the same chorus emerges: opinion writers at the New York Times, former senators, think tank executives, wealthy donors.

They all arrive with the same diagnosis and the same prescription: “Democrats have gone too far left, especially on economic issues.”

It’s deeply ironic. Of all the criticisms you might level at the Democratic Party, moving toward economic populism is not one you can actually make with a straight face. The party has remained steadfastly corporate—if anything, it’s become more so over my lifetime.

But what makes this moment so irritating is that it’s not new advice. This is the same playbook I’ve seen recycled over and over. The Third Way in the Clinton years. James Carville telling us to focus on the economy while signing NAFTA. The Heidi Heitkamps and Jon Testers who were supposed to show us the path forward. And now it’s Ezra Klein in the pages of the Times, holding up Joe Manchin as the model Democrat who could win in deep red states.

Let me tell you something Klein and the rest of this chorus don’t want to acknowledge: they’re not offering a new strategy. They’re screaming for more of what we just had. More of what led us to this authoritarian moment we’re living in. And I know they’re wrong because I can read a map, a calendar, and my own lived experience.

I’m from Tennessee. I watched what happened when Democrats abandoned us.

What Had Happened Was

West Virginia held a Democratic trifecta for 84 consecutive years - from 1930 to 2014. My home state of Tennessee had five Democratic House seats out of nine until 2010. These weren’t marginally competitive states. These were solidly blue, built on New Deal economics and strong unions.

Klein looks at this collapse and concludes Democrats need more Joe Manchins. But Manchin didn’t save West Virginia - he presided over its destruction. His winning margin collapsed from 24 points in 2012 to 3.3 points in 2018 before he quit rather than face voters in 2024. During his 14 years in the Senate, West Virginia went from Bush +6 to Trump +42 - the largest Republican margin in the entire country.

The rest of Klein’s “moderate overperformers”? Jon Tester lost Montana by 11 points in 2024. Claire McCaskill lost Missouri by 6 points in 2018. Heidi Heitkamp lost North Dakota by 11 points. Joe Donnelly lost Indiana by 10 points.

Every single example either lost badly or quit. The only one who came close was Sherrod Brown in Ohio - and he was the economic populist, not the moderate. Brown ran on pro-union, anti-corporate economics and lost by just 3.8 points while outperforming Kamala Harris. The progressive did better than all the moderates.

The Real Story: What Changed and Why

These states didn’t flip because Democrats talked about social issues. They flipped because of systematic economic abandonment by both parties.

We were already on a massive coward manufacturing trajectory but NAFTA was the nail in the coffin. Democrats and Clinton passed it in 1994. The results? West Virginia lost 41.5% of its manufacturing jobs. Tennessee’s textile mills closed and moved to Mexico. Now we import from China what we used to make ourselves - a catastrophic policy choice that made us dependent on a geopolitical rival while devastating American communities.

In West Virginia, union membership collapsed from nearly 500,000 United Mine Workers to fewer than 10,000 today. Coal mining jobs dropped from 130,000 to 12,000. 12,000 West Virginians work at Walmart, btw.

And here’s the thing nobody wants to say out loud: the answer to coal’s decline wasn’t more coal or Walmart jobs. The answer was making good on the promise of good jobs - building the future instead of clinging to the past. But we didn’t do that. We thought market magic would happen. We offered shitty low-wage service jobs and wondered why people went for Trumpism.

In Tennessee, I watched five Democratic House seats become one. Rural counties that voted for Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton now go for Trump by 50-point margins. This happened during the era Klein wants us to return to - the era of moderate Democrats, Third Way centrism, and corporate-friendly economic policy.

Klein’s diagnosis is backwards. These voters don’t call Democrats “preachy” because of pronouns. They call us preachy because we lectured them about being on the right side of history while both parties shipped their jobs to China, bailed out banks while they lost their homes, and got rich in office while their wages stagnated.

The Oligarchy Reveals Itself

If you want to understand what the moderate establishment actually cares about, just look at New York City.

The Democratic primary winner, Zohran Mamdani, got the most votes any candidate has ever received in a NYC Democratic primary. On Tuesday, voters elected the democratic socialist to be mayor of the nation’s largest city. He was backed by Governor Kathy Hochul, Attorney General Letitia James, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (finally), and the vast majority of major unions.

His opponent was Andrew Cuomo—who resigned as governor after sexually harassing 11 women and is under federal investigation for covering up nursing home deaths. Cuomo lost the Democratic primary badly—and then he lost again in the general running as an Independent against Mamdani.

Mamdani’s win is being treated as historic, but who did the establishment back all along the way? Cuomo.

Michael Bloomberg dumped over $8 million into pro-Cuomo super PACs. Bill Ackman, Ken Griffin, Dan Loeb—billionaires and hedge fund managers lined up. Bill Clinton endorsed him. Congressman Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.) praised his “character.”

Donald Trump and Elon Musk both endorsed Cuomo, with Trump saying plainly: “If it’s between a bad Democrat and a communist, I’m going to pick the bad Democrat.”

The same people lecturing progressives about electability backed the Trump-endorsed candidate who resigned in disgrace over the progressive who won the Democratic primary decisively. Mamdani will be the next mayor of New York City, but Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York would not even say if he voted for him or not.

This isn’t about ideology or electability. This is the oligarchy closing ranks. When faced with a candidate who threatened their economic interests—who promised to actually make housing affordable and buses free and childcare accessible—the divisions between establishment Democrats, Republicans, and tech billionaires disappear. They united to protect the extraction economy that’s made them wealthy.

An Inheritance Stolen

Between 1930 and 1975, America built deliberately. The New Deal, the Interstate Highway System, rural electrification, the GI Bill, the space program, Social Security, Medicare—these didn’t happen by accident or market forces. They were planned, funded, and executed by a government that understood its job was to build capacity for everyone.

We inherited the world’s largest economy, built by our grandparents’ generation. And then we fucked it up. For the past 50 years, we’ve let centibillionaires and trillion-dollar companies harvest what our forefathers built. We stopped being a country that builds and became a country that extracts.

And now the people telling us how to win are the same people who oversaw this destruction. They’re telling us the answer is more of what created the problem—more so-called “moderation,” more corporate-friendly policy, more means-tested half-measures instead of transformation.

Take healthcare. We spend $5.25 trillion a year—more than double what other countries spend per capita. If market magic were going to solve this, that ought to be enough money. But we don’t have enough doctors, nurses, hospitals, or pharmaceuticals. We have supply deserts because the system optimizes for profit extraction, not capacity building.

The Build Back Better approach follows the same failed logic: pump cash into the system and expect the invisible hand to make it work. But between 1930 and 1975, when we needed hospitals, the government built them. When we needed doctors, we funded medical schools. We didn’t subsidize people to pay inflated prices to monopolies—we built public capacity.

When someone like Mamdani proposes that New York City should have free buses and affordable housing, Abigail Spanberger calls it “unrealistic.” In the richest city in the richest country in human history, basic public services are dismissed as fantasy. That’s what 50 years of extraction looks like—we’ve forgotten we used to build things.

The Power Question

Here’s what Klein completely misses: Sherrod Brown didn’t lose because economic populism doesn’t work. He lost because he was alone.

Voters looked at Brown and thought: even if I elect him, what can he actually do? He’ll get blocked by Manchin types, ignored by leadership, buried in corporate money. He’s one guy against the whole system.

MAGA is a team. Trump has 50+ congresspeople coordinating, governors backing him, and judges ruling for him. When Trump says he’ll do something, voters see organized power capable of delivering.

One senator standing alone doesn’t look like power. It looks like someone who’ll try and fail.

This is why my cohort model isn’t about having “more things” like Klein suggests. It’s about visible, organized power - fifty candidates running together on a binding pledge, coordinating resources, primarying corporate Democrats, backing each other up. That looks like something powerful enough to overcome the system.

The Tea Party did this. They ran coordinated primary challenges and took over the Republican Party because voters saw organized power. Klein wants isolated moderates in red states and isolated progressives in blue states with no coordination, no shared strategy, no mechanism to overcome corporate Democrats blocking change.

What Voters Actually Want

Voters understand the system is rigged. They know both parties sold them out. They know their parents had better lives with less education. They know a single income used to support a family, buy a house, take vacations.

They’ve turned to Trump not because his solutions work, but because he at least acknowledges their rage. Our grandparents and great-grandparents inherited the world’s biggest economy and the elite took it and are renting it back to us. At the same time our own lives getting harder every year.

The moderate establishment looks at this moment and offers more of what created it. More pluralism. More internal disagreement. More of the same kind of visionless hopeless feckless Democrats. Politicians ready to damp hope and vision blocking transformation at every turn.

I suggest we offer what voters are actually asking for: a nation and an economy that work for them. One that creates and builds. One that doesn’t start wars. Doesn’t arm and back genocides. One that hears us.

To build that society we need people and political power capable of rebuilding what’s been systematically dismantled. America isn’t ready for hospice care. We can’t rely on market magic and means-tested subsidies. It’s time we build like our grandparents did.

The moderates had their chance. They lost everywhere. West Virginia, Tennessee, Montana, Missouri, North Dakota, Indiana, Ohio - the graveyard is full of moderate Democrats who couldn’t overcome a toxic brand created by 50 years of both parties serving corporate interests.

Klein and co want to try the same thing again and expect different results. I’m saying it’s time to try something that hasn’t failed yet: coordinated economic populism backed by organized power willing to fight the oligarchy that’s strangling this country.

The chorus is loud right now, demanding we go back to what just failed. Time to stop listening and start building.


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.


Corbin Trent is an Appalachian-born general contractor and political organizer. He co-founded Brand New Congress and Justice Democrats, helped recruit AOC, and served as her first communications director. He publishes AmericasUndoing.com, a project exposing America’s economic decline and calling for bold, public-led rebuilding. Find morework on his TikTokYouTube, and Facebook channels.
Full Bio >


'What the hell is going on?' Trump attacks Supreme Court for questioning his tariff powers

Alexander Willis
November 9, 2025  
RAW STORY


U.S. President Donald Trump gestures during the American Business Forum Miami at the Kaseya Center Arena in Miami, Florida, U.S. November 5, 2025. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

President Donald Trump erupted Sunday at the Supreme Court as its increasingly skeptical justices weigh in on the president’s authority to impose sweeping tariffs.

“So, let’s get this straight??? The President of the United States is allowed (and fully approved by Congress!) to stop ALL TRADE with a Foreign Country (Which is far more onerous than a Tariff!), and LICENSE a Foreign Country, but is not allowed to put a simple Tariff on a Foreign Country, even for purposes of NATIONAL SECURITY,” Trump wrote on his social media platform Truth Social. “That is NOT what our great Founders had in mind!”

The Supreme Court first heard arguments for and against Trump’s authority to impose tariffs last week, and a majority of the justices expressed skepticism at the Trump administration’s position, a skepticism that saw online betting platforms predict the court would strike down Trump’s signature trade policy.

Trump has grown increasingly panicked at the possibility of the Supreme Court striking down his tariffs, warning that the United States “could be reduced to almost Third World status” should the court rule against him. And on Sunday, that panic appeared to evolve into rage as Trump lashed out at the court online.

“The whole thing is ridiculous! Other Countries can Tariff us, but we can’t Tariff them???” Trump wrote. “It is their DREAM!!! Businesses are pouring into the USA ONLY BECAUSE OF TARIFFS. HAS THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT NOT BEEN TOLD THIS??? WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON???”

Trump’s argument in defense of the tariffs rests on his administration’s reading of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a 1977 law that permits the president to impose tariffs in response to emergencies. The emergency, his administration has claimed, is the United States’ trade deficits with other countries. Whether the court will agree with that position is set to be determined in the coming days or weeks.






Trump caught own allies 'off guard' with military threat based on Fox News story: report

David McAfee
November 9, 2025
RAW STORY



Donald Trump recently shocked his own allies with a military threat that came after the president watched a Fox New story on the topic, according to new reporting.

The Washington Post on Sunday published a new report called, "Trump’s ‘guns-a-blazing’ threat to Nigeria shocked key players, aides," in which the outlet claims that "Trump’s threat to go 'guns-a-blazing' into Nigeria concerned U.S. military officials in Africa and surprised even those who had been pushing the issue."

Raw Story reported more than a week ago that Trump threatened military action on foreign soil, escalating previous remarks about the ally.

"If the Nigerian Government continues to allow the killing of Christians, the U.S.A. will immediately stop all aid and assistance to Nigeria, and may very well go into that now disgraced country, 'guns-a-blazing,' to completely wipe out the Islamic Terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities," Trump said on Truth Social at the time. "I am hereby instructing our Department of War to prepare for possible action. If we attack, it will be fast, vicious, and sweet, just like the terrorist thugs attack our CHERISHED Christians! WARNING: THE NIGERIAN GOVERNMENT BETTER MOVE FAST!"

The Post investigated how that threat came to be, and reported, "Trump’s threat to go 'guns-a-blazing' into Africa’s most populous country was the result of a months-long pressure campaign on behalf of Nigerian Christians by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and American evangelical leaders — but it surprised even those who had been pushing the issue."


The report continued:

"The threat caught many off guard and generated immediate concern within United States Africa Command (AFRICOM), which directs American military operations across the continent. Leaders told the Pentagon they had other priorities, according to three people familiar with the matter, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss ongoing operations. One of those familiar said AFRICOM also communicated that striking a region with limited U.S. presence and intelligence was unlikely to make a difference."

Referring to Trump's new priority as "seemingly out of the blue," the report states that "the president’s initial post followed a meeting in Washington between his top advisers and members of the faith community, and after he watched a Fox News segment on the topic aboard Air Force One, according to three people with knowledge of the situation."

"The push to make the issue an administration priority was long in the making, the people said, but the president’s threat of military action was entirely unexpected," the report states.


Read the article here.


'This is on them': Trump admin scorched after systemic 'torture' of deportees exposed


Alexander Willis
November 9, 2025 
RAW STORY


Salvadoran prison guards stand next to alleged members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua and the MS-13 gang recently deported by the U.S. government to be imprisoned in the Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT) prison, as part of an agreement with the Salvadoran government, in Tecoluca, El Salvador, in this handout 
image obtained March 31, 2025. Secretaria de Prensa de la Presidencia/Handout 


The Trump administration is facing a wave of condemnation after new reporting has revealed details about the systemic “torture” migrants were subjected to after being deported to El Salvador’s notoriously dangerous CECOT prison.

The Trump administration has sent around 250 migrants to El Salvador’s CECOT prison as part of its broader mass deportation policy. And, while the prison’s tortuous conditions have been well documented, The New York Times recently spoke with 40 former inmates whose testimony, forensic experts say, indicated “the existence of an institutional policy and practice of torture,” the outlet reported Sunday.

Speaking with the Times, the former inmates said they were beaten repeatedly, subjected to waterboarding-like torture, stripped naked and forced to perform sexual acts, and denied lifesaving medication. Of the 40 men interviewed, only three had criminal histories beyond immigration and traffic offenses, despite Trump’s pledge to only deport the “worst of the worst.”

The detailed account of the torturous conditions left many critics stunned, including former MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan, who called for Democrats – should they regain control of Congress and the White House – to not forget what the Trump administration had subjected migrants to and to hold them to account.

“This is what Trump, [Vice President JD] Vance, [Homeland Security Secretary Kristi] Noem and [White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen] Miller did. This is on them,” Hasan wrote Sunday in a social media post on X to his nearly 2 million followers. “There needs to be criminal accountability if the Dems ever get back into power.”

Activist, lawyer and Trump critic George Conway concurred with Hasan’s call for accountability, telling his more than 2.2 million followers that the Trump administration should also face accountability for its targeted strikes on suspected drug traffickers – operations that some former officials have since questioned the legitimacy of.

“Absolutely, positively,” Conway wrote in a social media post on X Sunday, agreeing with Hasan’s statement. “And for the [Caribbean] boat strikes, too.”



‘Your AIPAC babysitter write that for you?’ MAGA senator torched for targeting activists

Alexander Willis
November 8, 2025 
RAW STORY


FILE PHOTO: U.S. Senator Tom Cotton, Chairman of the Senate (Select) Intelligence Committee, attends a confirmation hearing in Washington, U.S., January 15, 2025. REUTERS/Leah Millis/File Photo


Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) announced Friday that he had officially petitioned the Justice Department to open a criminal probe in the anti-war activist group Code Pink, and on Friday, was met with scorn from the organization’s co-founder and critics.

Cotton sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi Friday officially asking that the DOJ investigate Code Pink for providing “material support to foreign terrorist organizations,” citing the group’s work with the Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network, which itself is alleged to have ties to the leftist organization Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, which the United States has designated as a terrorist organization.

Medea Benjamin, the co-founder of Code Pink, fired back at Cotton over his request to have the DOJ investigate her organization.

“Omg. You are such a nut case,” Benjamin wrote in a social media post on X Friday. “Did your AIPAC babysitter write the letter for you?”

Benjamin was making reference to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a powerful political action committee that lobbies on behalf of a strong U.S.-Israeli relationship, and continued U.S. funding for Israel. She was also making reference to a past comment from Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) who claimed that every Republican lawmaker had an “AIPAC babysitter” that wields enormous influence over them.

Cotton, who’s received more than $1.3 million from the pro-Israel lobby, has been a staunchly pro-Israel lawmaker, having supported legislation to criminalize boycotting Israel, condemned pro-Palestinian protests as “little Gazas,” and encouraged Israel to escalate its military siege on Gaza, saying “as far as I’m concerned, Israel can bounce the rubble in Gaza.”

In his letter, Cotton also argued that Code Pink may be in violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), which mandates that individuals or groups publicly disclose that they work on behalf of foreign entities, citing the group’s funding from an American activist that allegedly has ties to China.

AIPAC has has drawn its own scrutiny related to FARA, with Massie having called for the lobbying group to register under the law as a foreign agent, which would force the organization to adhere to far stricter legal and compliance burdens, including required disclosures on communications with lawmakers and officials.

Benjamin’s response to Cotton’s announcement was not the only attack he received over the announcement.

“God you guys are so pathetic,” wrote Jenin Younes, the national legal director at the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, in a social media post on X Saturday. “Code pink is an antiwar organization, and its founder, Medea Benjamin, is Jewish. We should investigate you for treason for terrorizing Americans at the behest of a foreign country.”

Another X user, “Terig,” who describes themselves as a “human rights activist,” blasted Cotton for what they argued was an attempt to infringe on Code Pink’s First Amendment right.

“Maybe the Senate should reread the First Amendment,” they wrote. “Speaking for peace isn’t treason, it’s a constitutional right. Not everyone who criticizes war is ‘Chinese’ or antisemitic. Dissent is democracy, not disloyalty.”




Trump’s widening war on the left started with Palestine

The Trump administration's recent efforts to target left-wing groups started with attacks on the Palestine movement, following the strategy established by pro-Israel organizations that worked for decades to pave the way for such repression.

By Michael Arria 
 November 4, 2025 3
MONDOWEISS

President Donald Trump greets Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his wife, Monday, July 7, 2025, at the South Portico of the White House.(Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

In September, Trump issued an executive order claiming to designate “Antifa” as a “domestic terrorist organization” and a presidential memorandum (NSPM-7) that targets charities and advocacy groups over alleged national security concerns.

These efforts were seemingly driven by the assassination of right-wing commentator Charlie Kirk, which the Trump administration has continually blamed on the left despite a complete lack of evidence.

“The last message that Charlie sent me … was that we needed to have an organized strategy to go after the left-wing organizations that are promoting violence in this country,” declared White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller shortly after Kirk’s killing. “With God as my witness, we are going to use every resource we have at the Department of Justice, Homeland Security, and throughout this government to identify, disrupt, dismantle, and destroy these networks.”

While Kirk’s death provided the spark for Trump’s recent moves, the administration’s war on the left effectively began with its targeting of Palestine advocates.

Almost immediately upon arriving in the White House, the Trump team revoked visas, snatched people off the streets, detained legal citizens, and launched a McCarthyite campaign against university administrations for allowing anti-Israel sentiment to foment on their campuses.

“We ought to get them all out of the country,” declared Trump, referring to students who protested the genocide. “They’re troublemakers. They’re agitators. They don’t love our country. We ought to get them the hell out.”

The group Palestine Legal, which defends individuals targeted over Palestine advocacy, says it received over 2,000 requests for legal support in 2024, the year following the October 7 attack. That was 55% increase from 2023, and a 600% increase from 2022. Roughly two-thirds of the requests were campus related.

Palestine Legal staff attorney Dylan Saba tells Mondoweiss that the U.S. Constitution and past Supreme Court interpretations of U.S. terrorism prohibit the Trump administration from simply declaring groups as terror organizations, as Palestine Action was in the UK.

“The administration is trying to push a conspiratorial narrative that dovetails with their broader attacks on organizing, but the administration has not created new legal authorities,” said Saba. “Something like NSPM-7 invokes legal categories that don’t really exist. What they’re doing is directing the law enforcement infrastructure that already exists to target certain groups.”

“They are trying to manufacture consent for the targeting of their political opponents, but also perpetuate a climate chill,” he added. “Fundamentally, what they are seeking to do is in violation of the First Amendment. They want to go after people based on their beliefs.”

And the presidential memorandum hasn’t been the only tactic. In recent months, multiple Republican lawmakers have taken aim at the tax status of pro-Palestine groups.

In August, Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) sent a letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent calling on the IRS to investigate Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM) over alleged “ties to terrorism.”

At a panel at the second annual People’s Conference for Palestine later that month, PYM’s Aisha Nizar made a reference to Palestine activists potentially disrupting the F-35 supply chain.

These remarks led to another letter from Cotton, this one to FBI Director Kash Patel.

“Nizar’s statements constitute direct incitement of violence against U.S. national security interests by advocating for actions against the men and women who build the F-35 and seeking to imperil the delivery of one of the nation’s most strategic assets,” claimed the Senator. “I urge the Federal Bureau of Investigation to immediately examine Nizar’s actions and take any necessary actions to mitigate the threat. The U.S. defense supply chain is a key to our military’s ability to fight and win wars. We must protect that supply chain from all enemies, foreign and domestic.”

In September, Rep. Jason Smith (R-MO) sent a letter to The People’s Forum, demanding financial records and declaring that the pro-Palestine organization should lose its nonprofit status over alleged connections to the Chinese government.

“Since Hamas’ terrorist attacks against Israel on October 7, 2023, The People’s Forum has been responsible for an endless amount of chaos and disruption around the country,” reads Smith’s letter.


In targeting Palestine advocates or investigations, Trump and his allies are building on groundwork previously laid by pro-Israel organizations, who have spent decades pushing such moves.

In targeting Palestine advocates or investigations, Trump and his allies are building on groundwork previously laid by pro-Israel organizations, who have spent decades pushing such moves.

Shortly before the 2024 election, the Heritage Foundation unveiled Project Esther, a proposal ostensibly aimed at combating antisemitism, but actually designed to crush the Palestine solidarity movement.

Project Esther imagines a “Hamas Support Network” (HSN) throughout the United States, which includes groups like Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), the Palestine Solidarity Committee (PSC), American Muslims for Palestine (AMP), and Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP).

The Trump administration has implemented many of Project Esther’s recommendations, particularly its calls to crack down on the “HSN” on college campuses.

“I don’t think the impact of the Heritage Foundation can be overstated,” Defending Rights & Dissent policy director Chip Gibbons told Mondoweiss. “It’s very difficult to think of any private institute that has so dramatically influenced national security policy over the last 50 years.”

Gibbons also cited Capital Research Center (CRC), a conservative watchdog that tracks the finances of left organizations, as an administration influence. He points out that the FBI has historically used such right-wing, McCarthyite sources to pick targets for investigations.

In September, the Justice Department referred to a report by CRC while calling for federal prosecutors to investigate the liberal billionaire George Soros.

The Trump administration claimed that the CRC report showed how Soros is financing groups connected to terrorism, but in actuality, it simply showed that Soros’s Open Society network has provided multiple pro-Palestine groups with grants.

Last month, White House officials told Reuters that Trump’s goal was to “destabilize Soros’ network” and identified nine progressive organizations that they claim have financed violent protests, including JVP and IfNotNow.

Speaking to the New York Times, CRC president Scott Walter admitted that the group didn’t actually connect Soros to terrorism or violence in any way.

“We were surprised when the Justice Department suggested federal prosecutors use our report,” he explained.

So far, organizations that have been signaled out and targeted are not backing down.

“In the face of such blatant attempts to chill protest and shutter civil society, we will only get bolder and more defiant in our defense of freedom and democracy – from Palestine/Israel to the U.S.,” JVP Executive Director Stefanie Fox said in a statement.



D.E.I.

Virginia's Ghazala Hashmi makes US history as first Muslim woman to win statewide office

(RNS) — During this year’s lieutenant gubernatorial campaign, Hashmi faced attacks targeting her Muslim faith, including from her opponent.


Democrat Ghazala Hashmi speaks on stage at an election night watch party for Democrat Abigail Spanberger after Hashmi was declared the winner of the Virginia lieutenant governor’s race, Nov. 4, 2025, in Richmond, Va. (AP Photo/Stephanie Scarbrough)

Ulaa Kuziez
November 5, 2025
RNS

(RNS) — While Zohran Mamdani’s ascent to New York City’s mayoral seat marked a historic turning point for the city and its more than a million Muslims, in Virginia, Ghazala Hashmi, a Democrat who was elected as lieutenant governor, made her own history as the first Muslim woman ever elected to statewide office in the United States.

“This was possible,” she said in her victory speech Tuesday night (Nov. 4), “because of the depth and breadth of the opportunities made available in this country and in the commonwealth.”

Hashmi secured 55.1% of the vote in a competitive race against Republican John Reid, a conservative former talk show host.

Born in Hyderabad, India, and raised in Georgia, Hashmi, 61, had already made history as the first Muslim and first South Asian woman elected to Virginia’s Senate, representing Richmond, in 2019. As in that race, she campaigned for lieutenant governor with an agenda that was more progressive than her competitors in June’s Democratic primary, then took 55% of the vote on Election Day after promising to boost funding for public education and to stand up to President Donald Trump.

“The devastation that we’ve seen from the second Trump administration has far exceeded anyone’s expectations,” she told Religion News Service in late October. “We need to have strong, competent, as well as seasoned, individuals in place guiding states at this moment in history.”

Hashmi said her Senate run, too, was motivated by resistance to Trump, particularly his first administration’s attempt to ban Muslims from immigrating to the U.S. and its anti-immigrant policies in general. “It wasn’t so much in my thought to be the first,” she said, “but it was important that somebody be there in our state Assembly representing, advocating and speaking on behalf of all communities that were being disenfranchised and targeted.”

During this year’s lieutenant gubernatorial campaign, Hashmi faced attacks targeting her Muslim faith, including from her opponent. The senator said the bigoted tropes fortified her resolve to “shatter stereotypes” and “demonstrate the connections that Islam has long had with this country, how foundational and essential the traditions of the faith are to the same values of American democracy.”

RELATED: Anti-Shariah conspiracy theories, a staple of 9/11-era rhetoric, resurge around Mamdani

Her Muslim faith guides her policies, she said. “In Islam, we’re commanded to take care of those who are sick among us, to feed the hungry, to provide shelter to those who have no housing, to take care of the orphan and provide education to the young, to care for our elders. I take those basic guidelines and translate them into the policy choices,” she said, adding that her faith is part of her “approach in terms of the responsibility to move the needle on social justice.”

For nearly three decades, Hashmi worked as a professor and administrator in Virginia after earning a doctorate in literature at Emory University. She built a diverse, grassroots support base, earning endorsements from abortion rights groups, union leaders and multiple state and federal officials.

“Whether we’re talking about veterans or working parents, first generation students or immigrant communities, I literally had everybody sitting in my classroom, so it was easy for me to build that coalition,” Hashmi said.

Hashmi was also supported by Defend and Advance, a Muslim super PAC, and by the Council on American-Islamic Relations Action.

“We hope this historic moment will inspire American Muslims to continue pursuing public service in Virginia and across the country,” CAIR wrote in a statement congratulating Hashmi.

Several other Muslims won seats in Tuesday’s elections, including Dearborn, Michigan, Mayor Abdullah Hammoud; Dearborn Heights Mayor Mo Baydoun; and Virginia House Delegate Sam Rasoul.

In Minneapolis, two progressive Muslim women, Aisha Chugtai and Aurin Chowdhury, were elected to the City Council, but in the city’s closely watched mayoral race, progressive challenger Omar Fateh lost to incumbent Jacob Frey. Fateh, the 35-year-old son of Somali immigrants, pitched voters on a far left vision for Minneapolis, hoping to become the first Muslim and first Somali American mayor of the city, which has the largest Somali population in the U.S.

In New Jersey, Mussab Ali, who ran on progressive ideas and was often compared to his counterpart across the Hudson River, lost his bid for Jersey City mayor.
OPINION

Mad for Mamdani

Published November 8, 2025 
DAWN
The writer is a Pakistan attorney teaching constitutional law and political philosophy.

THE victory was not entirely unexpected but it was historic. For a while, the polls had shown that Zohran Mamdani, the immigrant Muslim of South Asian origin, was leading in the polls for New York City mayor. But it was not entirely guaranteed as pundits predicted that a larger-than-usual turnout of older voters who favoured Andrew Cuomo could cause an upset. That upset never came and on the night of Nov 4, America’s largest city elected a Muslim mayor for the first time.

For Democrats, particularly progressive Democrats, who had balked at their party’s tacit support for the genocide in Gaza, its lack of action over ICE raids, and lack of real solutions to inflation, the victory was a vindication. In Mamdani — against whom more than 20 billionaires put up millions of dollars — they could finally show where the energy of the party lay. Gen Z turned out in droves to support and vote for him. Here, finally after years of centrist fakes favoured by the likes of Hillary Clinton and Chuck Schumer, was someone who spoke the language of party voters. The margin of his victory shows how wrong the Democratic establishment had been.

The real story is also one of immigrants and of Muslims. New York is the city burdened with the memory of 9/11, which both the Republicans and the Democrats used to start and fund wars everywhere, thus triggering the age of Islamophobia. For over two decades, the memory of 9/11 has been used by politicians in NYC to justify racial profiling and the open targeting of Muslims or even anyone who ‘looks’ like one. Dubious security rationales and unsubstantiated ‘possibilities’ of attacks were used to terrify Muslim men and women. FBI and NYPD agents were sent to infiltrate mosques; Muslims were often coerced into informing on other Muslims even when there was nothing to inform on. Plans to build a mosque were met with vitriolic Islamophobia, including by Jewish-American groups in the city who used 9/11 to institutionalise the marginalisation of Muslims.

This leads to another facet of Mamdani’s win. NYC is the most Jewish city in the world outside of Israel. Many might have thought that in the shadow of the Gaza genocide and Mamdani’s open support for the Palestinians, such a victory was not possible. However, while large numbers in the Jewish community voted against him — exit polls showed Russian Jews had been especially mobilised against Mamdani — a decent number of young American Jews voted for him. Unlike older American Jews, most of whom tend to be Zionists and feel that criticism of Israel is antisemitism, younger American Jews have a more nuanced view.


The real story is also one of immigrants and of Muslims.

This is likely to be very concerning to Israel whose lobby AIPAC funds both Republican and Democratic candidates in the US in exchange for their support. In the mayoral debate for NYC, Mamdani was the only candidate who said he was not interested in taking a trip to Israel and would rather stay in NYC. He was criticised by the other candidates who doubled down on him, but he remained firm. He is also the man who won. This is likely to worry lobbyists who may wonder if politicians realise that Americans are quite exhausted with their politicians supporting Israel while they cannot afford rent or food.

Beyond NYC, Democrats won with big margins, which is being seen as a clear preview of what midterm elections in the US are likely to serve up next year. Voters voted against the Republicans and by default the Trump agenda by notable margins; even lacklustre Democratic candidates managed to win. This is welcome news for everyone in America who has been watching the gutting of the government that has been underway sin­ce the beginning of this year. Usually, presidents have a bit more time bef­ore the public tires of them. Not so this time.

As for immigrants and Muslims, the news was good from places beyond NYC as well. Virginia elected Indian American Ghazala Hashmi as their first Muslim American woman lieutenant governor; Muslims were elected as mayor of Dea­rborn, Michigan and Dearborn Heights.

Zohran Mamdani was nine years old when the events of 9/11 happened. His Oscar-nominated filmmaker mother Mira Nair, who is married to the well-known postcolonial scholar Mahmood Mamdani, likely never imagined that the grade schooler, who was a Muslim kid in a city that had begun to grow wary of Muslims overnight, would go on to become the youngest mayor of New York City in 100 years. But miracles do happen and the churn of history means that the outcast can be reborn as a leader in the same lifetime. Zohran Mamdani’s story is a lesson and an inspiration to all those who doubted the possibility of better times.

rafia.zakaria@gmail.com
Published in Dawn, November 8th, 2025

Mamdani win likely to give other Muslim progressive candidates momentum

(RNS) — Mamdani's election has already energized Muslim progressive candidates, political experts say, who are disillusioned by the Democratic establishment or feel shut out of the political system.


New York City Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani speaks at the Islamic Cultural Center of the Bronx mosque in New York on Oct. 24, 2025. (AP Photo/Ted Shaffrey)

Ulaa Kuziez
November 7, 2025
RNS

(RNS) — New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani spoke unapologetically about his Muslim faith and democratic socialist roots during his victory speech on Election Day (Nov. 4). In a sharp rebuke to the Islamophobic attacks he faced during the campaign, Mamdani said his mayoralty would be one where Muslim interests would be taken seriously in New York, “where the more than 1 million Muslims know that they belong — not just in the five boroughs of this city, but in the halls of power.”

Political experts say Mamdani’s historic win may motivate more Muslims and younger progressives to seek – and attain – those halls of power.

“Mamdani definitely has invigorated many Muslims around civic participation,” said political consultant Salima Suswell. “And I do think that there will be young Muslims who look up to him and want to follow in his footsteps, which I think is an amazing thing.”

The Council on American Islamic Relations, a civil rights and community engagement group, estimates that at least 37 other Muslim Americans won in elections on Nov. 4, among them Virginia Lieutenant Governor-elect Ghazala Hashmi; Dearborn, Michigan, Mayor Abdullah Hammoud; Dearborn Heights Mayor Mo Baydoun; and Virginia House Delegate Sam Rasoul.

Nabilah Islam Parkes, who became the first Muslim woman to serve in the Georgia Senate in 2023, anticipates that more Muslims will be inspired by the success of Mamdani and other Muslims, as she was by the electoral victories of Democratic U.S. Reps. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan. She said these Muslim women showed her that faith does not have to be a barrier to political office.

“They were definitely a catalyst for me as a young Muslim woman,” Parkes said. “It’s our time. We don’t have to wait for some far away time to run for office in this country — when there’s less Islamophobia.”

Mamdani not only showed that winning office was possible, he invited Muslims to rethink their relationship with politics in places where Muslims have felt dismissed or even betrayed by the political system. “I think this creates hope for people that there can be diverse representation in the political world, and not just diverse in imagery, but also diverse in thoughts,” said Saman Waquad, president of the Muslim Democratic Club of New York City, where Mamdani spent time early in political formation.

Waquad said Mamdani’s progressive politics are not for the Muslim community only, attracted a wide range of voters. “We can have political leadership that actually cares for the people and wants to make the city and this country livable and affordable,” she said, “and a political leader who actually thinks about the most disenfranchised folks.”

RELATED: Inside Zohran Mamdani’s bid to win over religious New Yorkers

While a majority of Muslim American politicians are Democrats, they are not uniformly progressive, and most tend to be more conservative on economic stances than Mamdani, said Nura Sediq, a political science professor at Michigan State University. Still, Mamdani’s election, Sediq said, has energized some Muslim disillusioned by the Democratic establishment, who are seeing renewed possibilities in Mamdani’s rapid rise from state assemblyman to mayor.




Zohran Mamdani, joined by his wife and parents, speaks during a victory speech at a mayoral election night watch party, Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2025, in New York. (RNS photo/Fiona André)

“Younger progressive candidates are going to feel more emboldened to take the shot and go from being a state legislator to mayor or a Senate seat quicker,” Sediq said.

For Abdul El-Sayed, a progressive Democrat running for U.S. Senate in Michigan, the rising number of Muslims in office is a reflection of a community with growing frustration with American politics. “So long as we continue to have a democracy, they can seek to express themselves in that highest order of citizenship, which is to run for an elected role in their government,” he said. “And that’s a beautiful thing.”

RELATED: Muslim voters didn’t cost Dems the 2024 election, a new poll says. But they may have found their voice

Some are concerned that, with increased visibility, the new wave of Muslim candidates will attract anti-Muslim bias. Islamophobia is on the rise, according to recent data from the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding, which surveyed close to 2,500 people to measure anti-Muslim sentiment among the public.

But CAIR, in a Nov. 6 statement, said that success at the ballot is an important way to push back against Islamophobia. “At a time when many American Muslim candidates endured slander, harassment, and overt Islamophobia, their strength and dedication to public service send a clear message that bigotry has no place in American politics and that Americans are rejecting anti-Muslim campaign rhetoric and cheap political attacks.”

Parkes, the Georgia state senator, agrees that running for and winning office is a antidote to Islamophobia, giving politicians a powerful platform from which to correct misunderstandings about the faith. “It’s so important that we see positive images of Muslims leading and leading well. It combats horrific narratives that are being spewed,” she said. “We are defining ourselves rather than being defined by the far right.”

As important as the increase in Muslim candidates, said Suswell, is the number of Muslims registered to vote, which is higher today than in 2016, ISPU data shows. With Muslim-led organizations mobilizing voters, supporting candidates and forming PACs, all signs point to a growing and diverse Muslim voter bloc.

“We are doing the work,” said Suswell. “As a community, building political power is paramount to us establishing change and supporting the unique needs of American Muslims.”

The Shift: Pro-Israel groups melt down over Mamdani win
November 6, 2025 
MONDOWEISS

Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL
Screenshot from ADL video.


Just hours after Zohran Mamdani prevailed in New York City’s mayoral election, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) announced that it was launching an initiative to track and monitor the policies of his incoming administration.

The ADL’s “Mamdani Monitor” will include a hotline that enables New Yorkers to report antisemitism.

“We are deeply concerned that those individuals and principles will influence his administration at a time when we are tracking a brazen surge of harassment, vandalism, and violence targeting Jewish residents and institutions in recent years,” ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt told Jewish Insider.

When Greenblatt showed up on MSNBC to plug the new project, he wasn’t greeted with the usual camaraderie that he’s presumably come to expect from the network.

“I’ll look right at the camera: if you are a Jewish New Yorker, we have your back,” he told viewers.

He then brought up a number of violent incidents, including the firebombing of Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro’s house, the fatal shooting of Israeli embassy staff members, and the deadly attack on a pro-Israel demonstration in Colorado.

“We’re all shocked and we all find this abhorrent and I’m sure the next mayor would say the same thing, wouldn’t he?,” responded conservative host Joe Scarborough.

“You have to ask him,” Greenblatt retorted.

“He has gone to one High Holiday service after another, he has talked to the Jewish community,” noted Scarborough.

Greenblatt told Scarborough that those people don’t actually count as Jews.

“He went to an anti-Zionist synagogue, which is like going to the Black breakout at CPAC and saying you understand African Americans,” he reasoned.

When Scarborough asked Greenblatt if he was suggesting that Mamdani supports violence, he insisted he wasn’t.

“I never said that! I never said that, no no!,” shouted Greenblatt.

The transcript of his remarks obviously tells a different story.

This was all too much for Scarborough.

“There’s a lot of blurring and blending here Jonathan!” he said. “You know I love you, you’re on all the time and we’re always a fierce defender of yours, but you seem to be blurring a lot of things together and then looking into that camera and say ‘call us!’”

This rebuke is relatively gentle and contains caveats, but it’s worth noting that mainstream pundits almost never push back on Greenblatt when he makes one of his frequent cable news appearances.

The Greenblatt narrative might not be registering like it used to, but dozens of pro-Israel groups are embracing it.

In a lengthy statement, American Jewish Committee (AJC) Ted Deutch expresses deep concerns about Mamdani’s support of BDS and his comments on arresting wanted war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu. He also calls on the mayor-elect to condemn the phrase “from the river to the sea,” but it certainly seems like that ship has sailed.

“And just as we defend every Jewish community around the world, today and in the months ahead, we’ll be standing proudly with New York’s Jews demanding the safety, security, and respect that we fully deserve,” writes Deutch.

Certainly he doesn’t mean every Jewish community, as Greenblatt made clear.

The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations said Mamdani’s win marks a “grim milestone.” Former Israeli finance minister and right-wing leader Avigdor Lieberman said, “The Big Apple has fallen,” and called on Jewish New Yorkers to flee to Israel. The Zionist Organization of America (VOA) vowed to fight against Mamdani’s alleged “anti-Jewish and anti-Israel policies and actions.”

“Globalize Zionism!,” declares a statement from the group on the election.

Democratic Majority for Israel (DMFI) sent out a fundraising email downplaying Mamdani’s victory. The group insists that the elections of pro-Israel Governors Abigail Spanberger and Mikie Sherrill are much more important.

“There’s a lot of noise in the political ecosystem because of a New York City electorate that is an outlier and not reflective of the rest of the nation,” says the group.

A pro-Israel lobbying group doesn’t think the most Jewish city in the United States reflects the rest of the nation? Makes you think.
Other results

New York City wasn’t the only city where Israel and Palestine factored into campaigns.

Two weeks ago, we dedicated a newsletter to several mayoral races. Willie Burnley Jr. lost in Somerville, and centrist Mayor Jacob Frey fended off socialist State Senator Omar Fateh, who faced unrelenting attacks from right-wing media and some Democrats.

At this time, it’s not known whether Israel-critic Katie Wilson or incumbent mayor Bruce Harrell has prevailed in Seattle.

Residents of Somerville, Massachusetts, voted on a municipal ballot proposal to divest from Israel and endorsed it by a 53% margin. The effort garnered 11,400 votes, surpassing those of mayor-elect Jake Wilson.

The group Somerville for Palestine put out a statement on the victory, detailing the local organizing efforts.

“Over 300 grassroots volunteers gathered more than 11,000 signatures to get the ‘Palestine Solidarity’ question on the ballot,” said the group. “Volunteers spent 7 months canvassing the city, chatting with joggers and bikers on the Somerville Community Path, collecting signatures at farmers’ markets and between garage-band sets at the popular ‘Porchfest’ local music festival. The homegrown Palestine Solidarity ‘Yes on 3’ Campaign defied the odds, defeating an 11th-hour opposition from an astroturf group backed by the controversial ADL which outspent them 4 to 1 in an effort to invalidate signatures and bring an unsubstantiated legal challenge which was quickly dismissed.”

The statement quoted Somerville resident and organizer Mia Haddad:

“This measure would follow previous successful efforts in Somerville to boycott companies complicit in South African Apartheid and those that use practices that violate human rights, such as prison labor. Just as these movements treated local activism and foreign policy as interconnected, Somerville residents see the intersection: “ We don’t want to see children go hungry, in Massachusetts or in Gaza.”

“Americans want to reinvest in our communities, not to see our tax dollars spent for genocide or squandered on lavish parties for billionaires.” The vote in Somerville now marks a decisive trend across the United States and around the world calling for aligning investments with community values by moving public money out of companies that contribute to Israel’s apartheid, genocide and illegal occupation of Palestine.”



At Mamdani victory party, a broad coalition of faith communities cheers Muslim mayor-elect

NEW YORK (RNS) — From prominent Muslim community leaders to members of Jews for Zohran, Hindus for Zohran and Shias for Zohran, the campaign’s election reflected the diverse coalition of religious communities who rallied behind him.



Supporters of Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani react as they watch returns during an election night watch party, Nov. 4, 2025, in New York. (AP Photo/Yuki Iwamura)

Fiona André
November 5, 2025
RNS


NEW YORK (RNS) — After the vote was in and Zohran Mamdani, the 34-year-old state assemblyman, had made history in becoming America’s largest city’s first Muslim mayor-elect, the comparisons to another seemingly out-of-nowhere political star began.

“Just like Barack Obama, who was an empowerment to the Black community, Zohran is an empowerment to the Muslim community,” said Juhaib Choudhury, the president of the Muslim Community Forum, at Mamdani’s election party on Tuesday (Nov. 4).

But Mamdani, who won 50.4% of the vote to defeat former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Republican activist Curtis Sliwa, didn’t only bring Muslims to the polls to vote for him. Like Obama, Mamdani fashioned a broad coalition to achieve a generational turnover, one that, as Mamdani said from the stage of the Brooklyn Paramount, “toppled a political dynasty.”

He did it with the help of a broad range of progressive faith groups, including anti-Zionist organization Jewish Voice for Peace and Jews for Racial and Economic Justice, both pivotal in organizing Jewish supporters. Rabbi Jason Klein, of the progressive Beit Simchat Torah congregation in Manhattan, said Mamdani’s election offers an opportunity for New York’s diverse communities to come together and seek to understand one another.

“I’m feeling optimistic about the possibilities of our city, for all the communities in our city,” said Klein before adding he appreciates Mamdani’s commitment to “recognize real antisemitism and to fight against it. … More broadly, I appreciate the commitment to every single community in New York.”

In his victory speech, Mamdani expressed his desire to unify the city and represent the country’s largest Jewish community. “We will build a City Hall that stands, steadfast, alongside Jewish New Yorkers and does not waver in the fight against the scourge of antisemitism,” he said.

But Mamdani’s coalition was also composed of young progressives and working-class New Yorkers, drawn by a program focused on affordability. As he took the stage behind a pulpit adorned with his landmark bright orange “Zohran for New York City” logo, he called his victory the beginning of a new era.

“From as long as we can remember,” Mamdani said, “the working people of New York have been told by the wealthy and the well-connected that power doesn’t belong in their hands.”

Young New Yorkers of every stripe were attracted to Mamdani’s unwavering support for Palestinians in Gaza while aligning with the Muslim community’s interests, though Mamdani’s condemnation of the war in Gaza and of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government earned him accusations of antisemitism from some Jewish New Yorkers. In parts of the heavily Orthodox Jewish neighborhood of Borough Park, Mamdani trailed even incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, who had dropped out of the race in October.

But Mamdani, a Twelver Shiite Muslim born in Uganda, refused to give up on any faith or ethnic group, often reaching them at their houses of worship. Many in those communities answered by organizing under such banners as Jews for Zohran, Hindus for Zohran and Shias for Zohran.



Juhaib Choudhury, right, president of the Muslim Community Forum, with fellow Zohran Mamdani supporters at mayoral election night watch party, Nov. 4, 2025, in New York. (RNS photo/Fiona André)

His deepest support came from Muslim New Yorkers, who voiced their feelings of marginalization in New York’s political landscape before Mamdani’s win. In his victory speech, the mayor-elect talked about dodging Islamophobic attacks from political opponents. “I am Muslim. I am a democratic socialist, and most damning of all, I refuse to apologize for any of this,” said Mamdani.

Mamdani peppered his speech with slang from the streets of Astoria, the neighborhood he has represented in the State Assembly since 2010, and made cultural references to his South Asian roots. “We will fight for you because we are you, or as we say on Steinway, ‘Ana Minkum wa Ilaykum,’” said Mamdani, referring to the busy Astoria commercial street and citing an Arabic adage meaning “I am from you and return to you.”

After dedicating his term to these communities, he exited the stage to the Bollywood tune “Dhoom Machale.”

The neighborhoods of Bay Ridge and Sunset Park, in Brooklyn, and Astoria, in Queens, all home to large Muslim and Arab American communities, went for Mamdani with 49.4%, 58.1% and 76.7% of the vote, respectively. In predominantly South Asian Jackson Heights, the mayor-elect obtained 56.5% of the votes.

Ali Zaman, the owner of Little Flower, an Astoria coffee shop favored by the new mayor, said Mamdani’s victory is significant for Muslims in the city, who, like Zaman, came of age after the 9/11 attacks. “There was a lot of shame around being Muslim, but now, Alhamdulillah, we have someone who’s a really good representative of our religion and our people,” said Zaman, using the Arabic phrase for “praise God.”

AjiFanta Marenah, right, vice president of New York’s Muslim Democratic Club, attends an election night watch party for Zohran Mamdani, Nov. 4, 2025, in New York. (RNS photo/Fiona André)
Katie Unger attends an election night watch party for Zohran Mamdani, Nov. 4, 2025, in New York. (RNS photo/Fiona André)

Mamdani’s election is a “very important moment,” said AjiFanta Marenah, the vice president of New York’s Muslim Democratic Club, where Mamdani made his political debut. “The first Muslim mayor and someone who we’ve seen come out openly and condemn Islamophobia, it means a lot because we’ve been targeted for a long time,” said Marenah, who mobilized voters in the Bronx.

RELATED: Zohran Mamdani is running to be New York mayor. How his Muslim faith stirred the race.

But Marenah, like others in Mamdani’s camp, said she got involved with the campaign not for his faith connections, but because his promises on affordability gave her hope. “Zohran and his politics are around affordable housing, affordable child care, fast and free buses, things that I want my community to have access to,” she said.

That sentiment was echoed from people celebrating Mamdani’s victory from across his coalition.

Katie Unger, a JFREJ organizer and member of Jews for Zohran, said Mamdani’s victory showed that the shared aspiration of making the city more affordable unified broad sectors of New Yorkers. “The safe, thriving and affordable city of our dreams comes from us being together,” she said.


Zohran Mamdani represents a historic turning point for American Muslims and all advocates for Palestinian freedom

For American Muslims, November 4, 2025, was a long time coming. Zohran Mamdani's victory serves as a rebuke to those who claim American Muslims have no place in their own country and to those standing in the way of Palestinian freedom.
 November 5, 2025
MONDOWEISS

Zohran Mamdani and supporters march over the Brooklyn Bridge in New York City on November 3, 2025. (Photo: https://x.com/zohrankmamdani)


When Columbia University students were smeared by New York’s political class and brutalized by the New York Police Department for protesting the genocide in Gaza, few of them probably imagined how the tides would turn in New York City just one year later.

Yet those young people and so many other New Yorkers did the seemingly impossible by turning out to vote in massive numbers and electing a Muslim mayor who recognizes and opposes the genocide they protested to lead New York City. His election is, in many ways, their victory too.

Mamdani won despite facing a barrage of anti-Muslim hate for touching the same third rail of American politics that college students touched: criticizing the Israeli apartheid government. His victory over Andrew Cuomo and an array of anti-Palestinian, anti-Muslim corporations, billionaires and establishment politicians was not just a political upset. It was a historic turning point in the struggle for representation and an unprecedented rebuke of Islamophobia and anti-Palestinian politics.

Mamdani was not alone in making such history. Virginia also elected state senator Ghazala Hashmi to serve as the next Lt. Governor, making her the first Muslim woman elected to statewide office in the United States.

Between Mayor-Elect Mamdani, Lt. Governor Hashmi, Attorney General Keith Ellison in Minnesota, and Reps. Andre Carson, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar and Lateefah Simon in Congress, American Muslims have made incredible progress that would have seemed impossible in 2008, when the Obama campaign infamously shepherded visibly Muslim women offstage at a campaign event.

For American Muslims, November 4, 2025, was a long time coming. After decades of civic engagement and patient perseverance amid unprecedented bigotry, American Muslims are no longer a political hot potato or beggars asking for a seat at political tables. They are increasingly sitting at those tables, even the head of table.

This progress has come despite—and, in many ways, because of—the deep currents of anti-Muslim bigotry that have tried to drown our community. For over thirty years, we have faced a toxic alliance of anti-Muslim bigots who hate the Islamic faith and anti-Palestinian lobby groups who fear the prospect of a politically powerful Muslim community ending unconditional U.S. for Israel’s oppression of the Palestinian people.

But their prejudice forged a new kind of resilience. It compelled our community to organize, to build lasting institutions, and to engage in politics against the odds, standing up for justice whether in our neighborhoods or in the halls of power.

This election was a rebuke to those who believe that American Muslims have no place in their own nation and those who have spent years suppressing politicians who oppose the oppression of the Palestinian people.

The message is unmistakable: the billionaires who bankroll anti-Muslim bigotry, the pundits who profit from division, and the politicians who weaponize fear are not invincible. Voters still matter. But we must not mistake progress for in one election for permanence. When movements for justice rise, those invested in injustice often respond with greater desperation.

That is why our work to advocate for justice here and abroad must continues, regardless of who is in office. Politicians will not save us or solve our nation’s problems on their own.

American Muslims do not seek privilege. We seek an America that protects equality under law. We seek an America that lives up to its founding ideals of religious freedom, free speech and civil rights. We seek an America that upholds democracy here at home and human rights abroad, including in Palestine.

The results of this election show what is possible when principle meets perseverance and faith meets action. The next generation has seen the truth. The future of America can belong to those who believe that justice is universal—God willing.

Nihad Awad
Nihad Awad is the National Executive Director and co-founder of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization in the United States.


Zohran Mamdani’s victory is a loss for Zionism

Zohran Mamdani’s historic victory in New York City shows that the Gaza genocide has permanently shifted Israel’s role in U.S. politics.
November 5, 2025 7
MONDOWEISS

Zohran Mamdani seen on stage at a campaign event. (Photo: Zohran Mamdani campaign)


After Democratic Socialist Zohran Mamdani prevailed over Andrew Cuomo in New York City’s mayoral race, former Israeli foreign minister and right-wing leader Avigdor Lieberman put out a statement through a spokesperson.

“The Big Apple has fallen,” declared Lieberman. He urged New York Jews who want to survive” to flee “to where they belong — the land of Israel.”

This farcical call is obviously based on fantasy, but the source of his anxiety is very real. Lieberman knows that Mamdani’s historic win is a blow to Israel, a country whose international reputation has already fallen apart.

For more than two years, the world has watched the Gaza genocide live-streamed across their electronic devices, and millions have taken to the streets to express their opposition.

Here in the United States, Palestine advocates have faced a brutal government crackdown that’s resulted in deportations, detentions, arrests, fines, and widespread censorship. This backlash has not subsided, but it failed to quell the resistance to Israel’s policies and the U.S. support for them.

A recent Quinnipiac survey found that a plurality of voters (47%) think supporting Israel is in the national interest of the United States, while 41% think it is not. That’s way up from the immediate aftermath of the October 7 attack, when 69% of voters thought supporting Israel was in the national interest, and just 23% disagreed.

A New York Times Siena University survey found that just 34% of U.S. voters say they back Israel, compared to the 47% who said they supported the country after October 7. The Times referred to the shift as a “seismic reversal.”

The gaps are much more severe among Democratic voters. In recent years, dozens of studies have concluded that the party’s base has completely split with its elected officials on this issue. A March Pew Poll found that 69% of Democrats have an unfavorable view of Israel, and a June Quinnipiac survey found that just 12% of Democrats sympathize more with Israelis than Palestinians.

Sympathy for the Palestinian cause was already increasing among Democratic voters, whereas support for Israel remained ironclad with Republicans. However, since October 7, the country’s supporters and its domestic lobbying groups have suddenly encountered an increasing number of problems on the right, particularly among young people.

In the aforementioned Pew poll, 50% of GOP voters under the age of 50 expressed a negative view of Israel, compared to just 35% in 2022. An August University of Maryland Critical Issues survey found that just 24% of Republicans aged 18-34 sympathize more with Israelis than Palestinians.

“The erosion among younger voters is not unimpressive,” Quincy Institute advisor and Responsible Statecraft editorial director Kelley Vlahos told Mondoweiss last month. “They do not have the same instincts, and they are less ideologically shackled. They’re not feeling the same pressure as the Boomer generation.”

Enter Mamdani. He might have pulled his punches as his campaign wound down, but he never actually condemned the phrase “From the river to the sea,” like his critics demanded. He also consistently referred to Israel’s actions in Gaza as a genocide and said he’d arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu if he set foot in the city.

These kinds of positions have long been viewed as disqualifying in U.S. politics. To say this kind of stuff was to touch the third rail and immediately nuke your election chances. Mamdani was accused of being obsessed with Israel, but his critics and the Cuomo campaign were the ones who continually brought up the issue.

They obviously thought his stances would hurt him, but a cursory glance at the numbers always showed that they would actually bolster his campaign. In an exit poll, 38% of New York City voters said their candidate’s position on Israel was a major factor in their voting decision. Less than a third said it wasn’t a factor at all.

Mamdani’s win can’t be dismissed as a blip or a fluke by pro-Israel groups. More than two million New Yorkers showed up to the polls, almost double the amount that voted in the mayoral election four years ago. He’s the first candidate to win over one million votes in an NYC mayoral contest since 1969.

He also did it in the most Jewish city in the United States, despite an ongoing smear campaign aimed at tagging him as an antisemite. In this sense, the election was a referendum on Zionism and a bold rejection of those who insist on conflating it with Judaism.

It’s unclear how Mamdani will govern, or what the inevitable political backlash will look like. It’s also debatable how much influence the mayor of a U.S. city could possibly have on Middle East policy. Many New Yorkers presumably voted for Mamdani because of his ambitious domestic agenda, and viewed his foreign policy positions as an added bonus.

However, it’s undeniable that last night’s results will have a lasting impact beyond New York. Mamdani hasn’t just provided a blueprint for leftists seeking power; he’s shown future candidates that embracing Israel is not a prerequisite for victory. On the contrary, it’s a strength.

“I think Cuomo and some of the other candidates are expecting that Mamdani’s support for Palestine in the end is going to hold him back and allow other candidates to get past him,” Democratic consultant Peter Feld told Mondoweiss months before the mayoral primary.

“I think Cuomo’s attempt to Israelize the election is going to backfire,” he added. “This could actually help give Mamdani further strength to overtake him. If that happens, I think it’s going to set the table for some of the primaries next year.”

The Big Apple hasn’t fallen, but the third rail of U.S politics has been removed from the track.
At least 2 killed, 7 injured in Israeli drone strikes in southern Lebanon amid ceasefire violations


November 8, 2025


Smoke billows from the area following Israeli attacks on the town of Tayr Dibba in the southern Lebanese province of Tyre, Lebanon, on November 6, 2025. [Houssam Shbaro – Anadolu Agency]

Two people were killed and seven others injured on Saturday in separate Israeli drone strikes in southern Lebanon, in a new violation of the ceasefire declared in late 2024, Anadolu reports.

Two brothers were killed when an Israeli drone struck a vehicle near the town of Shebaa, the state news agency NNA reported.

The attack occurred on a road connecting Ain Ata town to Shebaa, along the western slopes of Mount Hermon, causing the vehicle to ignite, it added.

In another attack, seven people were injured when an Israeli drone struck a car in Bint Jbeil, the agency said, citing a Health Ministry statement.

The drone launched two guided missiles targeting the car near Salah Ghandour Hospital in the city of Nabatieh.

NNA also reported another Israeli strike on a car in the town of Bar’ashit, leaving an unspecified number of injuries.

The Israeli army claimed that the drone strike in Shebaa killed two members of the Hezbollah-linked Lebanese Resistance Brigades.

A military statement alleged that the two brothers were involved in smuggling weapons used by Hezbollah.

The strikes came amid heightened border tensions, as Israeli forces carried out a series of air raids Thursday on several southern towns after warning residents to evacuate, the broadest such evacuation order since the ceasefire took effect.

Tensions have been mounting in southern Lebanon for weeks, with the Israeli army intensifying near-daily air raids inside Lebanese territory on claims of targeting Hezbollah members and infrastructure.

The Israeli army has killed more than 4,000 people and injured nearly 17,000 in its attacks on Lebanon, which began in October 2023 and turned into a full-scale offensive in September 2024.