Thursday, February 26, 2026

 Opinion

Tucker Carlson hears two evangelical Christian views on Israel. Which leads to peace?
(RNS) — Two back-to-back interviews by Carlson revealed a growing chasm within American evangelical Christianity over U.S. support for Israel.
The Rev. Fares Abraham, left, and Ambassador Mike Huckabee recently appeared on separate episodes of “The Tucker Carlson Show.” (Video screen grabs)

(RNS) — Two back-to-back interviews by conservative influencer Tucker Carlson in the past two weeks revealed a growing chasm within American evangelical Christianity over U.S. support for Israel.

The former Fox anchor, now host of “The Tucker Carlson Show,” recently interviewed the Rev. Fares Abraham, a Palestinian American pastor who is director of the evangelical organization Levant Ministries. Carlson then flew to the Ben Gurion Airport for a two-and-a-half-hour interview with Mike Huckabee, the U.S. ambassador to Israel, Baptist minister and former Arkansas governor.

If anyone wants to understand today’s Middle East evangelicals, they should listen to Abraham’s riveting personal story. His mother survived being shot by Israelis. When he was 10, Israeli soldiers dumped a huge stone on a neighbor, killing him immediately. Abraham said that Israel shelled the Baptist church in Gaza where his wife attended as a child and that Israeli snipers cut down another Gaza church’s pianist. She may not have bled to death, Abraham said, had the Israelis allowed ambulances to rescue her. Instead, the pastor said, her body showed signs of having been run over by a tank.




Abraham’s story diverges radically from what Huckabee told Carlson, which was a mix of dehumanization of Gazans, baseless generalizations and repetition ad nauseam of racist Israeli talking points. He exhibited total detachment from anything having to do with Palestinians, including any recognition of Palestinian nationhood or territory. He declared that the occupied West Bank is in fact part of historic Israel, calling it Judea and Samaria. He took it upon himself to represent, defend and express pride in the Israeli war machine, which he insisted is more humane than any other army, including that of the U.S.

Tucker Carlson, left, interviews Mike Huckabee, the U.S. ambassador to Israel, on a recent episode of “The Tucker Carlson Show.” (Video screen grab)

The interview with Huckabee itself came about after an exchange on the social media site X that ended with Huckabee daring Carlson to come to Israel so the ambassador could explain what Christian Zionism means.

Once Carlson was in front of him, Huckabee was unable to explain how U.S. policy applies to a verse in the Bible’s Book of Genesis about God granting the descendants of the patriarch Abraham the land that Israel now occupies. Carlson poked holes in Huckabee’s concept of who, specifically, the descendants of Abraham are, and whether the current secular leaders of Israel, whose families came from Eastern Europe, are worthy of this divine deed, which, Huckabee asserted more than once, applies to the land from the Nile to the Euphrates — Egypt to Iraq — even if the current Israeli government is not claiming it all at the present time.

Huckabee sounded more like a member of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud Party than a representative of the American people. 

The Rev. Fares Abraham focused on other biblical references — Jesus teaching that his kingdom is not an earthly entity and that all human lives, created in the image of God, must be preserved at all costs.


When I spoke with Abraham after the Carlson interview, he insisted that his core concern is to issue a pastoral call to the American church. “I invited Christians to listen directly to Palestinian Christian voices, to pray, to get informed, to visit the region and to stand in solidarity with the living Body of Christ in the Holy Land,” he said.

Tucker Carlson, right, interviews the Rev. Fares Abraham on “The Tucker Carlson Show.” (Video screen grab)



He emphasized that “the interview was not about polarization, but about awakening and faithful witness.”

It is doubtful that such a call will make a dent in Washington’s Middle East policy. Instead, the coming decision on a war against Iran will likely be made with Huckabee’s fantasies of a greater Israel in mind. We should ask ourselves, however, which is the way to peace. 

(Daoud Kuttab is the publisher of Milhilard.org, a news site focused on Christians in Palestine, Israel and Jordan. The views expressed in this commentary do not necessarily reflect those of Religion News Service.)

Biblical Writ and Christian Zionism: Mike 

Huckabee, Tucker Carlson and Israel


It was good of Mike Huckabee, US ambassador to Israel, to come clean with the witchery and superstition that marks the Bible. When a text advocating genocide, ethnic cleansing and dubious real estate advice in the name of a vengeful Sky God becomes foreign policy and the sentiment of an office holder, foreheads should crease with worry. But Huckabee has no concerns on conceding, as he did to conservative talk show host Tucker Carlson in a podcast interview, that Israel has an ancient, unsubstantiated right drawn from the heavens to claim good chunks of the Middle East.

In the interview, the niggling Carlson asked Huckabee whether Israel had a right to the land between the River Nile in Egypt and the Euphrates in Syria and Iraq, an area in the Biblical sense that was “essentially the entire Middle East”. The response: “it would be fine if it took it all”, though added that he did not believe Israel was intending to do so. Such a stretch of territory “would be a big piece of land”, though he did not think “that’s what we’re talking about here today.” The Israelis were merely “asking to at least take the land that they now occupy” for reasons of protection and security.

In another comment, Huckabee remarked that, “They’re not asking to go back to take all of that, but they are asking to at least take the land that they now occupy, they now live in, they now own legitimately, and it is a safe haven for them.” Some reflection then set in for the ambassador: his earlier remark about Israel seizing the entire territory had been “somewhat of a hyperbolic statement”.

The former Governor of Arkansas and Baptist minister has never been shy about support for Israel and its territorial ambitions. In 2017, he baldly stated that, “There was no such thing as a West Bank. It’s Judea and Samaria. There is no such thing as a settlement. They’re communities, they’re neighbourhoods, they’re cities.” Following such flawed logic, there could be “no such thing as an occupation.” In 2018, he got his hands dirty in laying bricks at a new housing complex in the West Bank settlement of Efrat, a town he inexplicably saw as “a bridge to peace” that offered Palestinians job opportunities and better earnings than if they were to work on Palestinian sites.

As a representative of the Christian evangelical movement, Huckabee sees Israel as caretakers of holy land, most notably Jerusalem, before the rapture, when Christ’s second coming will bring the world to its natural, apocalyptic conclusion. (What Jews do then is unlikely to be a point of theological joy, when the caretakers will be forced to become Christians on pain of eternal damnation.) The movement’s support has been so significant as to prompt Ron Dermer, former Israeli ambassador to the US and advisor to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, to call evangelicals “the backbone of Israel’s support in the United States”.

Huckabee’s comments, while they impressed the pro-annexation Israeli crowd including Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, found an impressively wide and indignant audience among Arab and Muslim states. On February 22, the foreign ministry of the United Arab Emirates released a joint statement with an impressive list of other foreign ministries: Egypt, Jordon, Indonesia, Pakistan, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, Bahrain, the Lebanese Republic, the Syrian Arab Republic, Palestine, the secretariats of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), the League of Arab States (LAS), and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). The parties strongly condemned and expressed “profound concern regarding the statements made by the United States Ambassador to Israel, in which he indicated that it would be acceptable for Israel to exercise control over territories belonging to Arab states, including the occupied West Bank.”

Such “dangerous and inflammatory remarks”, which violated international law and the Charter of the United Nations and constituted a “grave threat to security and stability of the region” were in direct contradiction to “the vision put forward by US President Donald J. Trump, as well as the Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict.” The latter would prevent the situation from escalating and create “a political horizon for a comprehensive settlement that ensures the Palestinian people have their own independent state.”

Traditional objections were reiterated: Israel had no legitimate sovereign claims to the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) or other “occupied Arab lands.” Attempts to annex the West Bank and sever it from the Gaza Strip and expanding settlement activities in the OPT and threats to the sovereignty of Arab states, were categorically rejected. Continued expansionist policies by Israel and its “unlawful measures will only inflate violence and conflict in the region and undermine the prospects for peace”. The ministries duly demanded “an end to these incendiary statements.”

Left flat-footed, the Trump administration made a clumsy effort to put out feelers of reassurance. Huckabee “doesn’t represent our views and doesn’t represent the best version of the pro-Israel position,” a State Department official told Politico in embarrassed anonymity. Deputy Secretary of State Chris Landau and Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Allison Hooker have also reportedly sought to placate concerned States that the ambassador was merely expressing his personal views, rather than signalling a change in policy.

As for Huckabee’s own efforts to address the Carlson exchange, a traditional ad hominem approach was in order. On social media, the ambassador has been busily sharing and discussing articles and snatches of vituperation accusing Tucker of antisemitism, lunacy and having “a memory problem or an integrity problem”. The pundit was “making statements instead of asking me questions and letting me respond,” moaned Huckabee in one post. Carlson, he also stated in an exchange with David Brodie of the evangelical Christian Broadcasting Network, had “routinely” disparaged Trump “with either direct attacks or inferences that his policies are wrong and hurtful to America and that [he] is getting pushed around by foreign governments”.

To Editor-in-Chief Joel Rosenberg of All Israel News, Huckabee further suggested that Tucker be barred from visiting the White House “because, quite frankly, this is a person who is doing serious, significant damage to President Trump and to the administration.” Not quite as much damage as Huckabee, let alone Israel’s continued stranglehold over the making of US policy towards the Middle East.

Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He lectures at RMIT University, Melbourne. Email: bkampmark@gmail.comRead other articles by Binoy.


 Martini Judaism

Don't misinterpret Bono's criticism of Israel's policies
(RNS) — Bono speaks as a friend of Judaism and the Jewish people. Let's give him the respect he deserves.
Bono sings during U2's performance at Lucas Oil Stadium on Sept. 10, 2017, in Indianapolis. (Photo by Daniel Hazard/Wikimedia/Creative Commons)

(RNS) — I am getting tired of the rock-and-roll intifada.

Here is what I am talking about.

In April 2025 at Coachella in California, the Irish hip-hop trio Kneecap projected statements such as “Fuck Israel. Free Palestine,” and led the crowd in chants of “Free Palestine.”


At Glastonbury in the UK, one of the world’s most storied music festivals, Bob Vylan took the stage and led the audience in chanting “Free, free Palestine” and “Death, death to the IDF.” Festival organizers reminded everyone that “there is no place at Glastonbury for antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence,” and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer criticized the “appalling hate speech.” 

According to a friend who attended the Newport Folk Festival, an emcee held up a Palestinian flag, and the crowd roared its approval. Again, according to friends who attended, this past summer, at Tanglewood, in the quiet Jewish Berkshires, Graham Nash stopped his music in the middle of his set to declare that what is happening in Gaza is a genocide — again, to widespread applause.

And now there is Bono.

Oh, no. U2?

No contemporary rock artist has Bono’s resume of activism. He has championed debt relief for African nations; co-founded campaigns like ONE and DATA to fight poverty and disease; and has spoken before political leaders.  

Musician Bono. (Video screen grab)

That is how we should interpret his recent criticism of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in an interview published in U2’s fanzine, Propaganda, alongside the band’s new EP, “Days of Ash.”

Days of Ash is a martyrology. It features songs about the killing of Sarina Esmailzadeh by Iranian security forces in 2022, the fatal shooting of Renee Good by an ICE agent and a song that memorializes Palestinian activist Awdah Hathaleen, who was killed by an Israeli settler in the West Bank in July.

After Oct. 7, Bono described the massacre as “evil.” He paid tribute to the hundreds of “beautiful kids” murdered at the Nova music festival during a performance. But as it all unfolded, Bono came to believe Netanyahu’s response to Oct. 7 and the ensuing war in Gaza was one of “sweeping brutality.”

He has gone further than the typical condemnation of the Gaza war. He has looked at the right wing manifestations in Israel and, in the recent interview, laments that Judaism was “being slandered by far-right fundamentalists from within its own community.”

“While I’m someone who is a student of, and certainly reveres, the teachings in many of the great faiths, I come from the Judeo-Christian tradition and so I feel on safe ground when I suggest: There has never been a moment where we needed the moral force of Judaism more than right now, and yet, it has rarely in modern times been under such siege.”


This is not the first time Bono has turned his gaze toward the Middle East. At the 2025 Ivor Novello Awards, he said: “Hamas, release the hostages, stop the war. Israel, be released from Benjamin Netanyahu and the far-right fundamentalists that twist your sacred texts.”

You might resent such criticism coming from an Irish gentile rock star. You might resent the unrelenting chorus of hectoring that comes from the cultural left, from oh-so-enlightened celebrities who somehow forget to include Hamas in their moral laundry list.

But, Bono’s voice is not the voice of an enemy. It is the voice of someone who believes Judaism possesses moral power — and fears what is happening to that moral power. 

Because consider that there are many Jews who would join Bono in this chorus — Israelis and diaspora figures alike. There are many Orthodox rabbis who have blown the shofar on this outrage against Judaism. Leaders across the Jewish world have described the influence of figures like Smotrich and Ben-Gvir as a hillul ha-shem, a desecration of God’s name.

Notice, please, what Bono is not doing. He is not demonizing Israel or Zionism. He is not casting aspersions on the Jewish people. Quite the opposite. He speaks as someone who has great sympathy for Judaism and the Jewish state, but balanced with his passion for peace.

One of the songs on the album, “The Tears of Things,” contains a striking lyric referencing the Holocaust: “Six million voices silenced in just four years, the silent song of Christendom, so loud everybody hears.”


Finally, let us give Bono credit where it’s due. One track on his new EP features Nigerian singer Adeola Fayehun reciting the anti-war poem “Wildpeace,” by Israeli poet Yehuda Amichai. In today’s climate, that is an act of courage — not least because I love Amichai’s work.

Here is the poem “Wildpeace,” on which the song is based:

Not the peace of a cease-fire
not even the vision of the wolf and the lamb,
but rather
as in the heart when the excitement is over
and you can talk only about a great weariness…

The poem asks a simple yet profound question: What does real peace look like?

Amichai teaches us that peace is not merely a ceasefire, not an idyllic vision of enemies curled up together without conflict, nor a noisy parade of slogans and politics. He imagines a peace born of weariness, of bodies and hearts grown tired of war — a peace like relief, like something earned.

There is that line that moves me most — and I would adopt it into my prayers:

“And the howl of the orphans is passed from one generation to the next, as in a relay race: the baton never falls.”

Like memory itself — passed down through centuries and sorrows.

The U2 song that has always moved me most is “I Still Haven’t Found What I’m Looking For.” Like the band, I still haven’t found what I’m looking for — a world in which music festivals are once again places of shared humanity rather than tribal divides; a world in which political anguish does not become an invitation to erase the humanity of others; a world in which Jews and Palestinians — and all who long for dignity — can at last lay down their batons.

Until then, I will keep listening, keep arguing, keep loving Israel enough to criticize it and loving Judaism enough to demand better of it.