Sunday, October 25, 2026

 

Earth’s magnetic field flipped rapidly across a mass extinction about 261 million years ago





Science China Press

Major geological events during the Permian period

image: 

(a) Polarity reversal frequency (blue line) and Paleointensity data. Dark-pink symbols with error bars illustrate mean paleointensity values calculated within age clusters. IR: Illawarra Reversal. (b) Volcanic activities. Dark red denotes the major phase of large igneous provinces (LIPs). Grey bars illustrate the silicic LIPs (SLIP). (c) Eustatic sea-level fluctuations and Pangea supercontinent configuration. (d) Carbon isotope profile. (e) Species diversity trends. EGME and EPME: End-Guadalupian mass extinction and End-Permian mass extinctions, respectively. T: Triassic Period. C: Carboniferous Period.

view more 

Credit: ©Science China Press





Earth’s magnetic field is generated by the convection of liquid iron in the outer core. It forms a protective shield that deflects most solar wind and galactic cosmic rays, limiting ionization in the upper atmosphere and helping maintain the ozone layer that screens life from ultraviolet radiation. Over geologic time the field reverses polarity many times, but the rate of those reversals is not constant. Long stretches of stability alternate with intervals of rapid flipping, and those changes are thought to reflect variations in heat flow across the core-mantle boundary.

About 261 million years ago, during the middle-late Permian, Earth was already under extremely chaos. The supercontinent Pangea was fully assembled, sea levels were unusually low, and massive volcanic eruptions were releasing gases that warmed the climate and disrupted ocean chemistry. Against this backdrop, a new study from the Fengshan section in southern China shows that the planet’s magnetic field was also in turmoil.

For tens of millions of years during the late Carboniferous and much of the Permian, Earth’s magnetic field stayed a single reversed polarity. That long quiet interval, known as the Kiaman Superchron, ended near 265 million years ago. What followed, according to a new high-resolution study of the Fengshan section in South China, was one of the most restless stretches of geomagnetic behavior yet measured.

Across a 3.75-million-year interval from about 262.5 to 258.75 million years ago, researchers recovered 29 distinct magnetic polarity zones. In the roughly 1.7 million years immediately before the end-Guadalupian extinction, the reversal rate climbed to approximately 11 reversals per million years—an order of magnitude higher than the long-term average in the geologic record. After the extinction, the field settled into a quieter pattern for a few million years.

The record comes from continuous shallow-water limestones that were deposited near the paleo-equator. Of more than 870 oriented specimens, 309 yielded stable, dual-polarity directions that survived rigorous demagnetization and reliability tests. Biostratigraphy, cyclostratigraphy, and radiometric anchors pin the hyperactive interval tightly against the extinction horizon near 261 million years ago.

The end-Guadalupian event itself is often overshadowed by the larger end-Permian mass extinction that followed roughly ten million years later, yet it was already severe: reef systems collapsed, many marine invertebrates declined sharply, and terrestrial ecosystems showed clear disruption. Conventional explanations center on the Emeishan large igneous province, global sea-level fall linked to Pangea’s assembly, and resulting ocean and climate stress. The new magnetostratigraphic data raise the possibility that an unstable geodynamo added another, less familiar pressure.

A more disordered or weaker field would have reduced the magnetosphere’s ability to deflect galactic cosmic rays and solar particles. Increased ionization in the upper atmosphere can erode ozone and raise surface ultraviolet flux—effects that have been documented, through pollen malformations and UV-protective compounds, at the later end-Permian crisis. Whether similar processes operated around 261 million years ago is not yet clear; the authors note that direct evidence is still limited and that LIP-derived halogens remain a plausible alternative or complementary driver of any ozone loss.

The geomagnetic instability itself is interpreted as a surface expression of changes deep in the Earth. After the long Kiaman stability, descending lithospheric slabs associated with the final assembly of Pangea may have reached the core-mantle boundary, locally increasing heat extraction from the core and introducing lateral variations in heat flux. Geodynamo simulations indicate that such heterogeneity can promote frequent reversals, although the models operate far from fully Earth-like conditions and remain sensitive to parameter choices.

The study does not claim that magnetic-field chaos caused the extinction. It documents a striking temporal coincidence and outlines a physically plausible pathway by which deep-Earth processes could have amplified surface environmental stress. Testing that pathway will require better paleointensity records across the same interval, tighter age constraints, and coupled atmospheric modeling. In the meantime, the Fengshan polarity sequence supplies one of the clearest windows yet into how the planet’s magnetic field behaved during a critical chapter of the late Paleozoic.

The research was led by scientists at the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, with collaborators from Utrecht University, BOKU University, Nanjing University, and other institutions. It was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

 

Doubling hydrogen production through a synergy of materials




University of Groningen
Illustration of a PCEC with the new material

image: 

This image shows the PCEC (left) with as a ‘sandwich’ of materials with the ceramic membrane in the middle, which allows the hydrogen without an electron to pass through. On the right is the new nanoengineered material developed by the researchers, shown at two different scales. 

view more 

Credit: Vassilis Kyriakou / University of Groningen






Many chemical processes require hydrogen, which is still being produced from fossil fuels. A Protonic Ceramic Electrolyser Cell (PCEC) is a device which can produce hydrogen from water at temperatures that match with key industrial processes. Researchers at the University of Groningen recently showed that careful coordination of materials in such a PCEC can double the production of hydrogen at the same amount of electricity consumption. The results are published in Energy and Environmental Science on 14 October 2026.

The process to produce hydrogen from water is not new, of course: lead an electric current through a bowl of water, and the water (H2O) is split into hydrogen (H2) and oxygen (O2). In a PCEC, this process is done with steam, which means the entire process (including the required heating) takes less energy. The steam is split into oxygen (O2) and hydrogen without an electron (H+). In the PCEC, there is a ceramic membrane, and only the hydrogen without an electron (H+) is small enough to pass through the pores of this membrane, attracted by a negative charge on the other side that allows it to form hydrogen (H2) again. Because the other atoms do not fit through the membrane, the produced hydrogen is kept separate from the rest. 

An important challenge for the development of such PCEC’s is splitting the steam with as little energy as possible, to allow hydrogen atoms to be recovered through the membrane. Vassilis Kyriakou, together with his team, developed a new nanoengineered material on the steam-side of the membrane that stimulates this splitting when coupled with the appropriate membrane materials. ‘We discovered a previously overlooked synergy between membrane and electrode materials,’ Kyriakou explains. 

With the right combination of materials, the researchers managed to double the production of hydrogen as compared to previous PCEC’s, and moreover, they demonstrated stable operation for at least five hundred hours. Kyriakou: ‘Our research initially had a different direction, but our first findings made us think of a completely new research direction. This created the feeling of falling down a rabbit hole, but it turns out there was a wonderland waiting for us on the other side.’ 

 

£3.4M Manchester-led project to tackle growing threat of mosquito-borne epidemics





University of Manchester

Manchester-led project to tackle growing threat of mosquito-borne epidemics

image: 

A researcher working with members of a local community in East Africa to investigate potential mosquito breeding sites around discarded tyres.

view more 

Credit: The University of Manchester





  • Manchester researchers will lead a £3.4m international project to tackle the growing threat of mosquito-borne viral epidemics in Eastern Africa. 
  • Funded by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) and the UK Government's Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO), ‘TACKLING MBU’ will investigate how changes including urbanisation, transport networks and forest loss are influencing mosquitoes, viruses and mosquito-borne viral disease risk. 

  • Researchers will combine data on mosquitoes, viruses, people and the environment to help identify potential disease hotspots and improve outbreak prevention. 

  • The project will assemble an international team with diverse expertise, from across the UK, Tanzania, Kenya and Malawi.  

Mosquito-borne diseases such as chikungunya, Zika and dengue are becoming increasingly epidemic in Eastern Africa, raising concerns about their potential to cause future outbreaks both within the region and further afield.  

Now, researchers at The University of Manchester will lead an investigation into what is driving that change and how this knowledge could help countries better predict, prevent and control future epidemics. 

The £3.4m ‘TACKLING MBU: Tackling the Rise of Mosquito-Borne Viral Epidemics in Eastern Africa’ project will see Manchester assemble researchers from the UK, Tanzania, Kenya and Malawi, combining expertise ranging from mosquito ecology and virology to public health, social science, genetics, mapping and mathematical modelling.  

Mosquitoes and the viruses they carry do not exist in isolation.  

Dr Catherine Walton, Senior Lecturer in the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences explains: “Growing cities, expanding transport networks and the loss or fragmentation of forests can all change the environments in which mosquitoes, animals and people interact. TACKLING MBU will investigate how those changes are influencing disease transmission. 

"Rather than studying a virus, mosquito species or outbreak in isolation, we will bring together data on mosquitoes, viruses, people and their environments to understand how these factors interact and influence disease risk. 

"TACKLING MBU takes its name from the Kiswahili word for mosquito, reflecting the communities at the heart of the project, and its focus on the importance of mosquito-based interventions to reduce disease risk."

The first phase of the project will gather mosquito, virus, environmental and human data from 50 sites across Kenya, Tanzania and Malawi. Mosquitoes will also be collected from other African countries, including Ethiopia, Uganda, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, working with partner institutions there, to track the spread of mosquito genes linked to a preference for feeding on people. 

Alongside analysing mosquitoes and viruses, the team will work with local communities to understand people's daily routines, travel, interactions with their environment and knowledge of mosquito-borne diseases.  

The team plans to produce national-scale disease-risk maps for Kenya, Tanzania and Malawi, alongside more detailed maps identifying potential “hotspots” where viruses circulating in wildlife could spill over into people.  

The aim is ultimately practical: giving public-health bodies better evidence to enable them to better target their surveillance and intervention efforts. The work will be carried out in partnership with the Ministries of Health in Kenya, Tanzania and Malawi, with whom the team will co-produce policy briefs on evidence-based, targeted surveillance and control of these diseases. 

Catherine Walton will lead the project, alongside Manchester co-leads Charis Enns, Jonathan Huck, Tucker Gilman and Simon Lovell, and three early career researchers including Cianjoka Gichuyia and Ben Broomfield. 

International co-leads include Joseph Kamau at the Kenya Institute of Primate Research , Dylo Pemba and Gama Bandawe at Malawi University of Science and Technology, and Gerald Misinzo at Sokoine University of Agriculture in Tanzania.  

The project, starting this November, is one of 18 new research and innovation projects funded by the UK Government and UKRI to tackle biosecurity threats. 

-ends- 

Notes to editors 

TACKLING MBU (UKRI award reference UKRI6702) is led by The University of Manchester (www.manchester.ac.uk) in partnership with Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania (www.sua.ac.tz), the Kenya Institute of Primate Research (www.kipre.go.ke) and Malawi University of Science and Technology (www.must.ac.mw). 

Project partners include the Ministry of Health, Tanzania; the Public Health Institute of Malawi; the Zoonotic Disease Unit, Kenya; Jimma University, Ethiopia; Kyambogo University, Uganda; the University of Rwanda; and the University of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo. 

The project is funded by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) and the UK Government’s Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO), with the award managed by UKRI’s Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC). It runs from 13 November 2026 to 12 November 2030. 

 

UC3M study highlights gender gap in AI media coverage in Spain






Universidad Carlos III de Madrid







This report analyzes a scientific corpus consisting of 7,115 news stories, 13,787 journalistic sources, and a total of 11,266 photographs and images published between 2017–2021 and in 2024. All data was manually gathered by about twenty researchers who are currently developing, as part of another scientific project, an algorithm to automatically analyze biases in media coverage.

According to the report, the distribution of media focus regarding individuals appearing in the analyzed period is highly unequal by gender: 41.60% focuses on men; 39.06% is mixed; 14.01% adopts a neutral focus; and 5.33% focuses on women. The study also examines proper names in headlines: 13.11% of total news stories feature a man's name, while a woman's name appears in only 4.19% (the majority of headlines are neutral—entities—or contain no proper names). "The exclusive presence of women records lower visibility throughout the study, confirming a profound invisibility of women," the report concludes.

Regarding journalistic sources, men account for 61.14% of quotes compared to 21.45% for women, reaching a disparity of more than 4 to 1 in C-suite or presidential positions. "Men are interviewed far more often as experts than women," concludes the study's lead author, Clara Sainz de Baranda, Professor of Journalism in UC3M's Department of Communication.

Stories bylined by female journalists tend to include a higher proportion of female sources (25.58%) than those bylined by men (18.96%). Nevertheless, male bylines widely dominate newsrooms (49.02% vs. 27.51% for women). Furthermore, the massive surge of corporate and institutional sources in 2024 (29.90%) has tended to displace space for independent female experts.

Narratives regarding technical development, corporate strategy, and the economics of AI are almost entirely dominated by male or institutional voices and images. The space granted to women is concentrated in academic research (where they represent 29.26% of sources in that sector) and in analyzing the social, ethical, educational, or cultural impact of technology.

Sexist language and gender biases

The report also analyzes sexist language, showing that while it has improved overall in news media, biases remain, such as the use of the generic masculine. "When reading a news story that mentions 'experts,' the mind defaults to viewing experts as men. Therefore, female researchers and women in general must be made more visible in language," notes Clara Sainz de Baranda. Another bias highlighted is the semantic leap, which occurs when discourse appears inclusive of everyone but later reveals women were not actually included: "They speak of 'experts,' and then it turns out the award winners were women," she points out.

According to the report, among 2024 news items featuring women, 83.12% include some form of sexist language and 81.06% rely on the generic masculine. When covering female professionals, invisibility biases persist, such as referring to them by job title without their proper name (14.45% of cases), asymmetrical treatment (first name for the woman vs. surname for the man), or framing their success as an exceptional or anomalous event.

In journalistic iconography, men are portrayed in active roles of leadership and control over technology (32.41% of images vs. 14.26% featuring women). In representations of women (and in female robot or gynoid depictions), dynamics of objectification and sexualization reemerge (8.59% of photos of women in 2024 exhibit sexualization biases). The report notes that 37.13% of AI-generated illustrations or creations examined in 2024 reproduce traditional gender stereotypes.

Recommendations for journalists

Beyond analyzing these inequalities, the project includes a guide to good journalistic practices to promote more egalitarian AI coverage, developed by Clara Sainz de Baranda alongside Carmen María Navarro López of UC3M's University Institute of Gender Studies.

Among other recommendations, they propose diversifying sources through gender-balanced contact lists that give visibility to women in executive positions and technical development, abandoning the generic masculine and narratives of exceptionality when covering female talent, eliminating the objectification and sexualization of robotic depictions, encouraging sex-disaggregated data in news stories, and increasing female journalists in business and technology desks.

Among the tools suggested for reviewing content is the reversal rule, which consists of swapping female and male gender terms to test whether the change alters sentence perception or reveals potential stereotypes. "Applying this test can help identify unequal treatment and revise language to avoid sexist expressions," they note.

Bibliographic references:

Sainz de Baranda Andujar, Clara et al. (2026). InfoIA. Análisis de las informaciones sobre Inteligencia Artificial publicadas en medios digitales. Investigaciones Feministas. Instituto de las Mujeres O. A., Ministerio de Igualdad. e-Archivo de la UC3M: https://hdl.handle.net/10016/51005 

Sainz de Baranda Andújar, Clara y Navarro López, Carmen María. (2026). IA e Igualdad. Guía de Buenas Prácticas para la Información Periodística. Investigaciones Feministas. Instituto de las Mujeres O. A., Ministerio de Igualdad. e-Archivo de la UC3M: https://hdl.handle.net/10016/51007 

Video: https://youtu.be/sW4i0988Tas

 

‘Invisible’ tweak could help make protein shakes less clumpy




RMIT University
Dr Sherrell demonstrating static attraction with and without an electric field

image: 

Dr Peter Sherrell from RMIT University’s School of Science explains the team’s findings on programmable static charge in the lab.

view more 

Credit: Will Wright, RMIT University






Scientists from RMIT University and Riga Technical University in Latvia have shown that static change left on surfaces can be controlled, which may have big benefits for companies needing to avoid the little zap in production of common household goods.

The discovery could even one day help stop powders such as protein, chocolate malt powders and coffee from clumping.

Static electricity is usually treated as a hazard to prevent. To reduce it, industry often adds expensive conductive additives as a one-size-fits-all fix. The cost of static discharge is about US$5 billion in the electronics industry alone. 

The new study findings offer a potential solution to this challenge, pointing to surfaces with static charge formation that could be programmed to suit application requirements.

The study co-led by Dr Peter Sherrell, from RMIT’s School of Science, in collaboration with Riga Technical University, has shown that applying an electric field while two surfaces touch and pull apart controls how much static charge is left behind. It can also control whether that charge is positive or negative – or remove the charge.

The first author and co-corresponding author is Dr Andris Å utka of Riga Technical University, and Professor Amanda Ellis from the University of Melbourne is a co-author. PhD student Dumindu Dassanayaka and Dr Qiang Sun from RMIT are also key contributors to the study.

"For example, if we had a conveyor belt processing or sorting seeds, the static charge would change based on the size or species of the seed," Dr Sherrell said.

"Our discovery means we could change the electric field around the conveyor belt depending on the species, so there is no risk of a seed getting a static shock."

Other possible uses include anti-static surfaces for manufacturing and electronics processing, controlling where charged particles or plastics stick and how they assemble, smarter sensors, and smart air and gas filters.

A smoother shake?

Most people have chipped lumps out of a protein shaker or chased a floating clump around a mug of chocolate milk. Few know that static electricity is one of the likely culprits.

As powders rub and tumble during manufacturing, packing and pouring, the grains can pick up static charge and cling to each other.

“In principle, we could apply a small electric field across powders as they move,” Sherrell said.

“That stops them charging up, so they don't get electrostatically ‘stuck’ to each other.”

The team tested plastics, rather than food products, but the findings of the study are good indicator for how the team’s approach could apply to food powders.

“The next step is to find out how strong the field needs to be, how long to apply it for each powder and where in the process it works best,” Sherrell said.

The team plans to test the approach on real powders and to study programmable surfaces at much smaller scales, so that different parts of the same surface can be programmed in different ways. 

Their current grant application with industry partners focuses on removing anti-static additives from fuels by tuning the surfaces the fuels touch, which could make fuel more energy efficient.

Solving a long-standing puzzle

The research also offers evidence on a question scientists have debated for years: what makes charge separate when two materials touch and pull apart?

Computer simulations showed that the electric fields the team applied were similar in strength to those created naturally when rough plastic surfaces press together. This supports the idea that tiny built-in electric fields help drive the separation of charge in everyday static electricity.

How the research was done

The team pressed polystyrene films together and pulled them apart 500 times, while applying external electric fields.

Stronger fields left more charge, and reversing the field from positive to negative reversed the charge. The same behaviour appeared in all of the plastic’s tested.

These results were compared to the computational models to understand what was happening.

Limitations

The scientists did the experiments in the lab on plastic films, mostly polystyrene, with other plastics in the supporting data. Food powders such as protein, malt drink additives and coffee were not tested.

The paper set the charge by applying a field during contact and then measured it afterwards. Switching the charge live, as in the conveyor example, hasn't been demonstrated.

The simulations use a simplified model, and the approach hasn't been tested on industrial equipment.

"The science would enable this to happen based on the discovery," Sherrell said.

'Electric fields control static charge during contact-friction-separation' is published in Nature Communications (DOI: 10.1038/s41467-026-77733-4).

The research was supported by the Latvian Central Finance and Contracting Agency (ERC project TriboCharge) and an RMIT Vice-Chancellor's Research Fellowship.

Full research paper available: https://rdcu.be/PLh5ckPmYWra

Multimedia: https://spaces.hightail.com/space/VNBxyfGZkr

Photos and video available of Dr Sherrell demonstrating static attraction with and without an electric field, and explaining the work in his lab to a colleague in his lab at RMIT. Credit: Will Wright, RMIT University.

Short news video: ‘Invisible’ tweak could help make protein shakes less clumpy