Sunday, October 25, 2026

 

Self-aeration system with decoupled interface purifies water, slashing energy costs by 95%




Science China Press

Mechanism of the Self-Aerating Electrocatalyst

image: 

A diagram illustrating the cascade mechanism. Anode-generated oxygen is captured by oxygen vacancies (OV) on the cathode (hydrophilic side). A steady flow of electrons from the cobalt core through the N-doped carbon matrix enables the reduction of O2 to H2O2, which is then activated at adjacent Co-N sites to produce pollutant-destroying singlet 1O2.

view more 

Credit: ©Science Bulletin






Persistent antibiotic contamination in water sources is a growing threat to global health and ecosystems. Current advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for water purification are often challenged by high operational costs and the need for continuous chemical inputs. A major expense is external aeration—the energy-intensive process of bubbling air into water to supply the oxygen required for breaking down pollutants. To address this issue, a research team has engineered a novel solution. They have designed a “spatially decoupled” electrocatalyst that creates its own oxygen-rich microenvironment, making the entire purification process more efficient and economical.

The innovation is centered on a cathode made of nitrogen-doped carbon with cobalt clusters, which is rich in a feature known as oxygen vacancies. This design separates two tasks that can conflict in some catalysts: capturing oxygen and donating electrons. In conventional designs, the same catalytic sites are tasked with both oxygen capture and electron donation, leading to an activity-selectivity trade-off. The new design addresses this by creating a division of labor at the nanoscale. Oxygen vacancies on the catalyst surface are effective at trapping oxygen, while the cobalt core provides a steady flow of electrons to regenerate these sites and power the reaction. This synergy allows for the construction of a“self-aeration”system. When paired with an anode, the system splits water molecules at the anode to produce oxygen. This in-situ generated oxygen is then efficiently transported to the cathode, where it is captured and converted into singlet oxygen (1O2)—a highly reactive species that is effective at destroying organic pollutants like antibiotics.

The performance results show that the self-aeration system achieved 98% removal of the antibiotic sulfamethazine, nearly twice the rate of a system using traditional external aeration. Furthermore, it removed over 90% of the total organic carbon (TOC), a measure of nearly complete mineralization of the pollutants, while the external aeration system mineralized less than 4%. The primary advantage is economic. A comprehensive techno-economic analysis revealed a treatment cost of $0.25 per cubic meter of wastewater, a 95-98% cost reduction compared to conventional AOPs. This is driven by the elimination of energy-intensive blowers and chemical reagents. Additionally, a carbon footprint analysis showed an 82% reduction in indirect carbon emissions. The system's practical applicability was tested by its robust performance in treating real-world samples, including raw hospital wastewater, where it achieved 92% TOC removal and met official discharge standards.

This work introduces a new paradigm for catalyst design by decoupling functions at the interface. This strategy has the potential to be applied to other critical chemical reactions, such as CO2 or N2 reduction, opening new avenues for addressing long-standing efficiency barriers in catalysis.

Humanoid robots for everyday life: Tamim Asfour receives the Leopoldina Greve Prize





Leopoldina





Humanoid robots that perform complex tasks in households, care facilities, or industry while learning from humans and their own experience: this is what Tamim Asfour has been researching for over 25 years. Together with his team at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), he has developed the ARMAR family of humanoid robots, spanning from ARMAR-I, one of Europe’s first humanoid robots, to today's ARMAR-7 – developing both their physical bodies and their intelligence. The engineer and computer scientist is internationally recognised as one of the leading figures in robotics and embodied Artificial Intelligence. In recognition of his research achievements in the field of humanoid robotics, the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina is now awarding Tamim Asfour the 2026 Greve Prize. The prize, which is endowed with 250,000 euros, is donated by the Helmut and Hannelore Greve Foundation for Science, Development and Culture.  

"Tamim Asfour’s research impressively demonstrates how concrete future technologies emerge from top-level interdisciplinary research," says Leopoldina President Bettina Rockenbach. "His approach combines mechatronics, computer science, perception, learning, and artificial intelligence into integrated systems, opening up new perspectives for the use of humanoid robots in everyday life and the working world." 

Humanoid robots can attract attention through spectacular movements such as somersaults or flips. Tamim Asfour’s research addresses a far more challenging question: how can robots grasp and manipulate objects in real-world environments, perform complex tasks, and learn from humans and their own experience? To achieve this, Asfour develops cognitive humanoid robots as holistic hardware and software systems that integrate perception, motion control, action planning, learning, and interaction. In experiments, ARMAR-III and ARMAR-7 support people with domestic tasks, while ARMAR-6 assists with maintenance and repair work. 

His work follows the approach of embodied Artificial Intelligence. For robot systems to one day work independently in households, hospitals, care facilities, or industrial environments, they require a body that interacts with the world, as well as an intelligence that learns from this interaction. Asfour developed a cognitive robot architecture featuring an episodic memory, which enables robots to store, retrieve, and describe experiences in natural language. For instance, ARMAR-7 can answer the question of what it saw in the kitchen that morning, describing objects, actions, and events from its own experience. This is considered a milestone in fundamental research on the path towards truly cognitive robots with embodied intelligence that learn incrementally through interaction. 

Furthermore, Asfour has created widely used, freely accessible research infrastructures, most notably the KIT Whole-Body Human Motion Database, one of the world’s largest collections of data on human full-body movements. 

Tamim Asfour studied electrical engineering and earned a doctorate in computer science at the University of Karlsruhe (now: Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, or KIT). He has served as an Adjunct Professor at the Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech) in the USA and at the National University of Singapore (NUS). Since 2012, he has been Professor of "Humanoid Robotic Systems" at the Institute for Anthropomatics and Robotics (IAR) at the KIT Faculty of Informatics. There, he holds the Chair of High Performance Humanoid Technologies (H²T). He is also the spokesperson for the Robotics Institute Germany. 

The Greve Prize of the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina is awarded to scientists or research teams working at German universities, non-university research institutes, or commercial enterprises. The award is presented every two years and recognises particularly outstanding research achievements in the fields of natural sciences/medicine and engineering sciences. The Greve Prize, on each occasion, focuses on a specific topic. This year, the topic is "Robotics and Embodied Intelligence". The prize is endowed with 250,000 euros, funded by the Greve Foundation. Further information on the Greve Prize can be found at: https://www.leopoldina.org/en/tasks/honouring-excellence/greve-prize 

The award ceremony will take place on Friday, 27 November 2026 at 11 am as part of a formal ceremony to which the President of the Senate of the Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg, First Mayor Peter Tschentscher, invites guests to Hamburg City Hall. Journalists interested in attending the award ceremony are requested to contact presse@leopoldina.org via email by 6 November. Interviews with the laureate will gladly be arranged. 

The event will be livestreamed on the Leopoldina’s YouTube channel: www.youtube.com/NationaleAkademiederWissenschaftenLeopoldina. 

About the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina 
As the German National Academy of Sciences, the Leopoldina provides independent science-based policy advice on matters relevant to society. To this end, the Academy develops interdisciplinary statements based on scientific findings. In these publications, options for action are outlined; making decisions, however, is the responsibility of democratically legitimized politicians. The experts who prepare the statements work in a voluntary and unbiased manner. The Leopoldina represents the German scientific community in the international academy dialogue. This includes advising the annual summits of Heads of State and Government of the G7 and G20 countries. With around 1,700 members from more than 30 countries, the Leopoldina combines expertise from almost all research areas. Founded in 1652, it was appointed the National Academy of Sciences of Germany in 2008. The Leopoldina is committed to the common good. 

About the Helmut and Hannelore Greve Foundation for Science, Development and Culture 
Prof. Dr. h. c. Helmut Greve and Prof. Dr. h. c. Hannelore Greve founded the Helmut and Hannelore Greve Foundation for Science, Development and Culture in 1995. In the area of science, the foundation provided start-up capital spread over three years to establish the Academy of Sciences in Hamburg, the creation of the highly endowed Hamburg Science Prize, and since 2022 the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina’s Greve Prize. The highly conscientious approach of the foundation’s founders, their keen sense for quality, and their insight into what is necessary and what is possible shape the foundation’s work to this day. Directors Eva-Maria Greve and Wolfgang Peter Greve continue to guide the foundation according to these principles.


A soft robot arm powered by algae and light



Delft University of Technology

A collection of soft robot arms inside custom designed aquariums

image: 

A collection of soft robot arms inside custom designed aquariums

view more 

Credit: Delft University of Technology / Studio Oostrum




Tiny underwater algae sway gently in the current. All of a sudden, a light shines on them and they form robotic-like arms that start to pick up small rocks and put them in floating baskets. Sounds like science-fiction, but researchers from Delft University of Technology (The Netherlands) have created a small soft robot arm covered with minuscule algae that can grasp and lift objects. And it’s powered by light. This exciting next step in biotechnology has just now been published in Nature Communications.

The tiny robot arm can perform large, reversible bending movements controlled by light. “Our proof-of-concept actuator is a green and soft strip made of two different hydrogel layers, with microalgae growing on its surface”, lead researcher Marie-Eve Aubin-Tam explains. “It is about 2 cm long and 1 mm thick. When exposed to changing light conditions, the strip can bend back and forth. The shape of the actuator can be easily changed to allow for different movement and function.”

Grasping and lifting

The robot’s movement can be used for simple tasks such as grasping and manipulating small objects, particularly in underwater environments where soft and gentle handling can be useful. As demonstrations, first author Fan Jiang and fellow researchers used the actuator to hook and lift a rubber ring and to grasp a small metal ball.

Beyond grasping, the robot can also reproduce movements found in nature. Its light-controlled bending could, for example, be incorporated into blinds or agricultural devices that change their shape or orientation in response to light. These demonstrations show how the basic bending motion could be developed into both soft robotic and biomimetic functions. But scientists are often driven by innate curiosity, Aubin-Tam admits: “We didn’t start with a specific application. Our goal has always been to bring the research of living materials to new levels. We wanted to explore what becomes possible when living cells are integrated into functional materials.”

How do they do it?

The microalgae drive the actuator through their metabolism, which depends on light. During illumination, the algae use light energy and CO2 to create their cellular “fuel” in form of sugars through photosynthesis, while they also use nitrogen to build cell components. These processes together increase the pH in the hydrogel. Jiang: “Since the two hydrogel layers respond differently to pH changes, they swell to different degrees, causing the strip to bend. When the light is switched off, the cellular fuel is “burned” releasing CO2, that shifts the pH back down. Within 10 seconds the actuator already starts bending in the opposite direction.”

Autonomous and environmentally responsive

According to Aubin-Tam, their new technology could contribute to soft robotic systems that are more autonomous and environmentally responsive in the longer term: “Microalgae are plantlike organisms that are largely self-sustaining. They use light as their energy source through photosynthesis, which gives the actuator potential for long-term operation with minimal external input. In theory, it wouldn’t require a lot of energy to run a system based on this technology.”

“It is also just exciting to directly visualise the metabolic activity in microorganisms to be honest. To see synthetic materials actually translate the algae’s biological responses into mechanical motion.”

A soft robot arm grasps a small metal ball when exposed to light [VIDEO] 

A soft robot arm lifting a rubber ring when exposed to light [VIDEO] 



Professor Marie-Eve Aubin-Tam at Delft University of Technology (The Netherlands) holding up a soft robot arm inside a small square aquarium.

 

PhD candidate Fan Jiang holding up a soft robot arm inside a small square aquarium.

Credit

Delft University of Technology / Studio Oostrum

 

Word choice matters: The extinction of plants and animals is a crisis, but calling it an “extinction crisis” doesn’t help



A new study finds that using unfamiliar terms can dampen public concern.





University of Southern California






The loss of Earth’s animal and plant species is a crisis. Just don’t call it an “extinction crisis” if you aim to mobilize public concern.

Published today in npj Biodiversity, a Nature Portfolio journal, a new study finds that using unfamiliar terms results in less public concern and less willingness to support policies that could tackle the crisis. The study focused on how to effectively communicate urgency about the loss of plant and animal species, otherwise termed “biodiversity loss.” 

Most people have heard of the “extinction of plants and animals.” But most have not heard of the “extinction crisis”. The scientific term “biodiversity loss” is also not widely known. 

Using effective language to raise the alarm about the extinction of plants and animals is an urgent matter. At least 1 million plant and animal species are at risk of extinction, according to the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). 

“Almost everyone has heard of extinction and wants to support policies to save plants and animals. But if you use unfamiliar terms to describe it, then people are not as concerned or willing to act,” said Wändi Bruine de Bruin, the study’s lead author. “Environmental experts need to recognize that much of their terminology is jargon to average people.”

Bruine de Bruin is Provost Professor of Public Policy, Psychology, and Behavioral Science at the USC Price School of Public Policy and the USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, and a senior scholar at the USC Schaeffer Institute for Public Policy and Government Service.

The study involved a representative sample of 7,338 U.S. adults, each of whom was randomly assigned to one of six terms commonly used in public communication about the loss of biodiversity.

The six terms were biodiversity loss and biodiversity crisis, nature loss and nature crisis, and extinction of plants and animals and extinction crisis. Each term was presented either alone or accompanied by an explanation and photos of plants and animals.

Biodiversity loss and biodiversity crisis were the least familiar and concerning, even when presented in the context of an explanation and photos of plants and animals.  

Extinction of plants and animals was the most familiar term and raised the most public concern, regardless of whether context was presented. Nature loss performed just as well but only when context is provided. 

The results held across political and demographic groups.

The release of the study comes near the outset of the biennial UN Biodiversity Conference, in Yerevan, Armenia, where representatives of 195 countries are focusing on the first global review of collective progress towards implementing the world’s nature targets under the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. 

“We are hoping the conference delegates take heed of the study so that they convey their findings in clear, simple language that maximizes its impact, empowering children and communities to make informed decisions and take action,” said co-author Moa Cortobius, climate resilience and anticipatory action adviser for Save the Children International.

Additional co-authors were Monica Dean and Carling Monder of the USC Dornsife Public Exchange; Allison Agsten of the USC Annenberg Center for Climate Journalism and Communication; Moa Cortobius of Save the Children International; Georgia Silvera Seamans of Local Nature Lab; Kimberly Tenggardjaja of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife; and Robert Spaull of IPBES.

The study is the latest in a series in which Bruine de Bruin and her co-authors have examined the effectiveness of terms used to communicate environmental issues. The first study, published in 2021, found that people struggled to understand words and terms commonly used to describe climate change. Another study, published in 2024, found that the terms “climate change” and “global warming” were more effective than “climate crisis,” or “climate emergency.”

“A pattern has clearly emerged: simple, familiar language is most effective at communicating urgent environmental issues,” Agsten said.

The study was funded by the Golden Belt Community Foundation.

###