Monday, November 21, 2022

Byjus, Meta, Twitter: India tech workers fight back amid mass layoffs

  • Published
IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES
Image caption,
Several IT companies have cut thousands of jobs in the past couple of months

Thousands of young Indians are suddenly staring at an uncertain future as technology companies and start-ups announce mass layoffs due to global headwinds and funding crunches. But many are refusing to stay quiet about it.

In October, when Ravi (name changed on request) realised that he and several colleagues were likely to lose their jobs with a major Indian edtech firm, he immediately set up a private messaging group with them.

The group soon became a "safe space" for Ravi and his teammates to air their fears, share tips on dealing with the management and discuss labour laws and workers' rights.

"It helped many in the team negotiate better exit policies with the company," Ravi says.

The past few months have been difficult for Indian workers in private companies - especially in the tech sector. Edtech firms Byju's and Unacademy have cut hundreds of jobs; social media giant Twitter has laid off more than half of its staff in India and Indians are among those affected after Meta - Facebook's parent company - shaved off about 13% of its 87,000-strong workforce.

The spate of layoffs has sparked outrage on social media and many of those affected are turning to the internet - like their counterparts in other countries - to air their dissatisfaction and form support networks.

They're tweeting about unceremonious firings, asking for jobs on LinkedIn, and using messaging platforms such as WhatsApp and Slack to rally colleagues, assert their rights and share information with journalists.

IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES
Image caption,
Twitter fired thousands of people after Elon Musk took over

This is partly because the culture of shame and silence that once existed around redundancies in India is gradually wearing thin as mass layoffs become more common.

Pritha Dutt, a management and development sector professional, says that even a couple of decades ago, terminations were most likely chalked up to "a performance issue".

"Today, layoffs and downsizing have become accepted business practices, so terminations are no longer a taboo topic," she says.

And while the jury is still out on how effective social media is as a tool for redressal, experts say that it is helping unite and amplify voices, especially as trade unions are no longer as powerful as they used to be.

While millions of Indian workers still belong to trade unions, the movement as a whole has been weakening for years. A number of factors - including burgeoning private sector jobs, new labour reforms and a rise in contractual work - have played a role in denting their membership and might.

"Along with employers making themselves more accessible, social media too is giving employees a platform to air their grievances, thereby reducing the need for a mediator - a role traditionally played by unions," says Professor Chandrasekhar Sripada at the Indian School of Business.

IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES
Image caption,
Millions of Indians are part of trade unions

After Byju's announced in October that it would "rationalise" about 2,500 employees to "achieve profitability", many of its employees have been speaking to the media - often anonymously - about the company culture and the pressures they face.

Sacked Twitter employees have taken to social media to vent their frustrations. "Always a Tweep never a Twit," tweeted one former employee in a veiled reference to new owner Elon Musk's Twitter bio at the time. "Got fired without even a confirmation email. There's always a new low," said another.

With the job market expanding, Ms Dutt says employees have become more confident about the marketability of their skills and don't mind standing up for their rights, even if that means burning bridges by calling out a person or organisation on social media.

And this public outrage can sometimes help, like pushing employers to apologise for firing staff in an insensitive manner or for promoting a toxic work culture.

But Ms Dutt cautions that this success could be limited and short-lived. The option may also not be available to everyone - many still fear speaking out as they worry it might jeopardise future job prospects, or invoke legal action from their employer.

IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES
Image caption,
Workers at Amazon, Starbucks and Apple in the US have been unionising

That's why many employees are also looking for other ways to air their grievances and fight for their rights.

In the southern city of Thiruvananthapuram, 140 Byju's employees who alleged they were being forced to resign went on a protest and also met a Kerala state minister, who announced an investigation into the matter - the state is governed by a coalition of Left parties, which advocates for workers' rights.

Days later, Byju's said it had reversed its decision to shut down operations at Thiruvananthapuram.

Three former employees at an edtech firm told the BBC on condition of anonymity that they were working with a trade union to negotiate severance and notice periods with the company.

Suman Dasmahapatra, president of the Bangalore chapter of the All India IT & ITeS Employees' Union - a registered trade union that has been assisting hundreds of tech employees with labour disputes since 2018 - said that the organisation's membership has been steadily growing.

He concedes that this is still tiny compared with the total number of employees - a majority of IT sector professionals, he says, are still uncomfortable being part of trade unions, either because they fear reprisal from the management, or because "they don't see themselves as 'workers'".

But Mr Dasmahapatra says he is confident that India will see a resurgence in unionisation as the push and pull of global economic forces make the job market more volatile.

Over the past couple of years, US giants such as Amazon, Starbucks and Apple have seen their workers form unions and observers say calls for unionisation are likely to grow louder, and spread across industries.

Prof Sripada, however, disagrees. He says that the proliferation and strengthening of trade unions need not become the norm, as workplaces have already become more conscious about adopting progressive, people-centric policies.

"Unions are a product of bad people management. When employers fail, unions rise. Employers today have the benefit of hindsight so the responsibility lies with them to make people management the centre of business," he says.

"But if organisations continue laying off people in an insensitive and callous manner - as we're seeing happen frequently - the story might be different."

Elon Musk's Twitter account with Twitter logo.
Elon Musk took control of Twitter last month.Getty Images
  • Elon Musk is considering further layoffs at Twitter as early as Monday, Bloomberg reported.

  • The cuts would target Twitter's sales and partnerships teams, per the report.

  • Bloomberg's sources said two senior executives were fired for refusing to agree to further layoffs.

Elon Musk might make further layoffs at Twitter as early as Monday, Bloomberg reported, citing anonymous sources.

The additional cuts would target employees in the company's sales and partnerships teams that were less affected by recent resignations than technical roles.

Musk asked leaders in Twitter's sales and partnerships teams to agree to fire more of their employees on Friday, Bloomberg reported. Robin Wheeler, who ran the marketing and sales team, and Maggie Suniewick, head of Twitter's partnerships team, were both fired for resisting the cuts, per the report.

Wheeler initially resigned on November 10, but was persuaded to remain at Twitter by Elon Musk. Just one week later, he fired her.

Suniewick only joined Twitter from NBCUniversal in June.

Twitter's employee headcount has been slashed over the past month. On November 4, a week after Musk's takeover, he axed more than half its staff.

On Thursday, more than half of the remaining 4,000 or so employees opted to accept severance rather than commit to Musk's "extremely hardcore" vision for Twitter, which involved working "long hours at high intensity."

The resignations were particularly widespread among technical roles, leaving Twitter scrambling to find available engineers. In a series of emails sent around midnight PT on Friday, Musk asked to meet with "anyone who actually writes software" on Friday afternoon.

Wheeler, Suniewick and Twitter did not immediately respond to requests for comment by Insider.

Elon Musk fired Twitter's head of sales after begging her to stay at the company, report says

Twitter logo on building
Twitter headquarters in San Francisco, California.Tayfun Coskun/Getty Images
  • Robin Wheeler, Twitter's head of ad sales, is no longer working for the company, Platformer reported.

  • Wheeler was fired a week after reports said Elon Musk convinced her not to resign.

  • The move comes as Twitter deals with mass resignations.

About a week after Elon Musk persuaded Twitter's head of ad sales, Robin Wheeler, not to resign, he changed his mind and fired her, according to reporting by Platformer.

Sources told Casey Newton, who runs the Platformer newsletter, that Wheeler had been fired Friday. One source also told Insider Wheeler had been fired but declined to give additional details.

Wheeler had handed in her resignation last Thursday along with several other senior leaders, but was persuaded to stay by the new owner, Bloomberg reported. Shortly after Newton broke the news of her firing on Friday, Wheeler posted to social media with what appeared to be a confirmation of her departure.

"To the team and my clients….you were always my first and only priority," Wheeler tweeted, adding a salute emoji that has come to be a symbol of departing the company.

Wheeler did not immediately respond to Insider's request for comment.

Since Elon Musk acquired the social media platform for $44 billion at the end of October, the company has made sweeping cuts to its workforce of 7,500 employees. Making good on his promise to investors to cut staffing, Musk quickly initiated layoffs following the completion of the deal. In the weeks since, more than 3,700 jobs have been cut.

On Thursday, approximately 1,200 more employees resigned, The New York Times reported. The payroll department and other financial employees departed en masse after Musk asked employees to commit to an "extremely hardcore" Twitter 2.0 with "long hours at high intensity" or quit.

Since the takeover employees have also described chaotic working conditions, including laid off workers being asked to return to the office84-hour weeks, and some employees sleeping on the office floor. One employee was fired after a public disagreement with Musk on Twitter and contractors were unceremoniously informed their work with the company had ended with less than 24 hours notice.

"It might not seem like a big deal, but I don't think it's appropriate to treat employees like this," one worker told Insider's Jyoti Mann.

Musk and representatives for Twitter did not immediately respond to Insider's requests for comment.


Chinese coast guard seizes rocket debris from Filipino navy


In this photo provided by the Philippine Coast Guard, Coast Guard personnel carry debris, which the Philippine Space Agency said has markings of the Long March 5B (CZ-5B) Chinese rocket that was launched on July 24, after it was found in waters off Mamburao, Occidental Mindoro province, Philippines on Aug. 2022. Metal debris from Chinese rocket launches, some showing a part of what appears to be Chinese flag, have been found in Philippine waters in at least three other instances. 
(Philippine Coast Guard via AP, File)

JIM GOMEZ
Sun, November 20, 2022 

MANILA, Philippines (AP) — The Chinese coast guard forcibly seized floating debris the Philippine navy was towing to its island in another confrontation in the disputed South China Sea, a Philippine military commander said Monday. The debris appeared to be from a Chinese rocket launch.

The Chinese vessel twice blocked the Philippine naval boat before seizing the debris it was towing Sunday off Philippine-occupied Thitu Island, Vice Admiral Alberto Carlos said Monday. He said no one was injured in the incident.

It’s the latest flare-up in long-seething territorial disputes in the strategic waterway, involving China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwan.

Chinese coast guard ships have blocked Philippine supply boats delivering supplies to Filipino forces in the disputed waters in the past, but seizing objects in the possession of another nation's military constituted a more brazen act.


Carlos said the Filipino sailors, using a long-range camera on Thitu island, spotted the debris drifting in strong waves near a sandbar about 800 yards (540 meters) away. They set out on a boat and retrieved the floating object and started to tow it back to their island using a rope tied to their boat.

As the Filipino sailors were moving back to their island, “they noticed that China coast guard vessel with bow number 5203 was approaching their location and subsequently blocked their pre-plotted course twice,” Carlos said in a statement.

The Chinese coast guard vessel then deployed an inflatable boat with personnel who “forcefully retrieved said floating object by cutting the towing line attached to the” Filipino sailors’ rubber boat. The Filipino sailors decided to return to their island, Carlos said, without detailing what happened.

Maj. Cherryl Tindog, spokesperson of the military's Western Command, said the floating metal object appeared similar to a number of other pieces of Chinese rocket debris recently found in Philippine waters. She added the Filipino sailors did not fight the seizure.

“We practice maximum tolerance in such a situation,” Tindog told reporters. “Since it involved an unidentified object and not a matter of life and death, our team just decided to return.”

Metal debris from Chinese rocket launches, some showing a part of what appears to be Chinese flag, have been found in Philippine waters in at least three other instances.

Rockets launched from the Wenchang Space Launch Center on China’s Hainan island in recent months have carried construction materials and supplies for China's crewed space station.

China has been criticized previously for allowing rocket stages to fall to Earth uncontrolled. The Philippine Space Agency earlier this month pressed for the Philippines to ratify U.N. treaties providing a basis for compensation for harm from other nations' space debris, and NASA accused Beijing last year of “failing to meet responsible standards regarding their space debris” after parts of a Chinese rocket landed in the Indian Ocean.

The Philippine government has filed many diplomatic protests against China over aggressive actions in the South China Sea but it did not immediately say what action it would take following Sunday's incident. The Department of Foreign Affairs in Manila would usually wait for an official investigation report before lodging a protest.

Thitu island, which Filipinos call Pag-asa, hosts a fishing community and Filipino forces and lies near Subi, one of seven disputed reefs in the offshore region that China has turned into missile-protected islands, including three with runways, which U.S. security officials say now resemble military forward bases.

The Philippines and other smaller claimant nations in the disputed region, backed by the United States and other Western countries, have strongly protested and raised alarm over China’s increasingly aggressive actions in the busy waterway.

U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris, who is visiting Manila, is scheduled to fly to the western province of Palawan, which faces the South China Sea, on Tuesday to underscore American support to the Philippines and renew U.S. commitment to defend its longtime treaty ally if Filipino forces, ships and aircraft come under attack in the disputed waters.
New Zealand court rules voting age of 18 is discriminatory


 People stand outside the executive wing of the New Zealand Parliament complex, popularly known as "Beehive" because of the building’s shape, in Wellington, New Zealand

Sun, November 20, 2022 

By Lucy Craymer

WELLINGTON (Reuters) -New Zealand's highest court ruled on Monday that the country's current voting age of 18 was discriminatory, forcing parliament to discuss whether it should be lowered.

The case, which has been going through the courts since 2020, was bought by advocacy group Make It 16, which wants the age lowered to include 16 and 17 year olds.

The Supreme Court found that the current voting age of 18 was inconsistent with the country's Bill of Rights, which gives people a right to be free from age discrimination when they have reached 16.

The decision triggers a process in which the issue must come before parliament for discussion and be reviewed by a parliamentary select committee. But it does not force parliament to change the voting age.

"This is history," said Make It 16 co-director Caeden Tipler, adding: "The government and parliament cannot ignore such a clear legal and moral message. They must let us vote."

The group says on its website there is insufficient justification to stop 16 year olds from voting when they can drive, work full time and pay tax.

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said the government would draft legislation to reduce the age to 16, which could then be put to a vote in parliament.

"I personally support a decrease in the voting age but it is not a matter simply for me or even the government, any change in electoral law of this nature requires 75% of parliamentarian support," she said.

Political parties have mixed views on the subject. The Green Party wants immediate action to lower the voting age to 16, but the largest opposition party, the National party, does not support the shift.

"Obviously, we've got to draw a line somewhere," said National party leader Christopher Luxon. "We're comfortable with the line being 18. Lots of different countries have different places where the line's drawn and from our point of view, 18's just fine."
An amateur metal detectorist thought he found a candy wrapper in the mud. It turned out to be a medieval gold wedding band in near-perfect condition worth $47,000.


Hannah Getahun
Sat, November 19, 2022

Getty Images

David Board, a 69-year-old metal detectorist, discovered a wedding ring in the mud in 2019.


The ring turned out to be a rare medieval ring worth thousands of dollars.


The words "I hold your faith, hold mine" are engraved inside the ring in medieval French.


In 2019, David Board surveyed the grounds of a pasture field near Thorncombe, Dorset, in England and happened upon what he believed to be a candy wrapper.

Upon closer inspection, the 69-year-old metal detectorist realized it was actually a wedding ring, five inches deep in a pool of mud. Board stuffed it into his pocket.

"It was once I got home and washed it off that we realized it was a lot better than we thought," Board told CNN.

The wedding band turned out to be a medieval diamond ring worth up to $47,300.

According to British auction house Noonans Mayfair, The Lady Brook Medieval diamond ring may have possibly been given to a woman named Lady Joan Brook, who married Sir Thomas Brook, in 1388. Brook formerly owned the land that the ring was discovered on, according to Noonans.

The Lady Brook Medieval diamond ring will go on sale on November 29, according to Noonans Mayfair.



Nigel Mills, a consultant at Noonans, said in a press release that the ring was in "almost perfect condition."

The ring is made of two metal bands that cross over each other, meant as a symbol of union, with the words "ieo vos tien foi tenes le moy" — or "I hold your faith, hold mine" in medieval French — engraved into them.

"There will probably never be another one like it," Board told CNN. "Back then, each ring was individual and unique, not mass produced like today. It's stunning."