Wednesday, January 15, 2025

 

A way forward in breeding rice to withstand high nighttime stress



Gene editing may aid in development of rice tolerant of higher temperatures



University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture

Vibha Srivastava portrait in greenhouse 

image: 

Vibha Srivastava, professor of plant biotechnology in the Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences Department for the University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture.

view more 

Credit: U of A System Division of Agriculture photo by Paden Johnson




By John Lovett

University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture

Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station

FAYETTEVILLE, Ark. — Rice plants can deal with the heat during the day, but when the sun goes down, they need to chill out.

Developing rice with tolerance to higher nighttime temperatures has become a focus for rice breeders because studies are showing nights are getting warmer in the largest rice-growing regions.

Half of the rice grown in the United States comes out of Arkansas, mostly from the Delta. Arkansas has been home to about 1.4 million acres planted in the grain that serves a staple food for more than half of the world’s population, according to the USDA Economic Research Service.

“Rice breeders have tried to incorporate tolerance genes into the background of Arkansas rice, which is not an easy task,” said Vibha Srivastava, professor of plant biotechnology in the crop, soil and environmental sciences department for the University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture. “They have just started to scratch the surface in that area, but they’re making good headway. Some promising updates are there.”

However, Srivastava said there may be another way forward — gene editing, which is different from genetic modification because it does not insert DNA sequences from other organisms, she explained

Srivastava explores the topic of breeding rice and the potential for gene editing to tolerate night heat in the December issue of Current Opinion in Plant Biology with an article titled “Beat the heat: Breeding, genomics, and gene editing for high nighttime temperature tolerance in rice.”

Her co-authors of the article were Christian De Guzman, assistant professor of rice breeding and genetics, and Samual B. Fernandes, assistant professor of agricultural statistics and quantitative genetics, both researchers with the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, the research arm of the University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture.

It is the first review article about high nighttime tolerance in rice to their knowledge, gathering all the available scientific literature on the subject in one place.

Srivastava said there has also been information on the subject published in the B.R. Wells Rice Research Series with studies led by Paul Counce, professor of rice physiology at the Rice Research and Extension Center, on screening rice for responses to high nighttime temperature, susceptibility, or tolerance.

De Guzman, Fernandes and Srivastava were awarded a four-year, $585,650 grant by the U.S. Department of Agriculture to breed rice for high nighttime tolerance. The Current Opinion in Plant Biology article expounds on the information gathered for the grant proposal.

Why night heat tolerance

When rice is in its flowering and grain-filling stages, it is more sensitive to high nighttime temperatures than high daytime temps. The optimum rice growing temperatures vary globally, but the authors point out that most rice varieties show sensitivity to night-time temperatures above 28 Celsius, or 82.4 Fahrenheit.

The higher temperatures lead to yield losses and grain quality decline expressed as “chalkiness,” an undesirable characteristic that impacts milling quality, cooking quality and palatability.

Based on recent studies, the authors noted that the results of high nighttime stress can lead up to 90 percent loss in grain yield and a significant increase in chalkiness.

Srivastava said the genetic mechanisms of high nighttime stress susceptibility are not clear, but they know that an elevated respiration rate during high nighttime temperatures diverts energy from growth to repair and impacts the formation of biomass.

Challenges ahead

While there are no known modern cultivars bred in the United States that can withstand exposure to high nighttime temperatures during the reproductive stage, an Indian variety called Nagina 22 offers high nighttime tolerance. However, when grown in field conditions in Arkansas it showed some undesirable traits like small grain size, chalkiness and tall stalks susceptible to falling over, known as lodging.

Nagina 22 has been used in crosses with modern cultivars to get the high nighttime tolerance, but the genes have not been cloned. Without gene identity, the application of gene editing to improve the traits of popular cultivars is impossible, Srivastava said. In the meantime, she points to gene editing as another way to improve desirable traits in Nagina 22, or in crosses with Nagina 22.

A few advanced breeding lines in the Arkansas Rice Breeding Program could be candidates for gene editing if they show improved traits related to yield and grain chalkiness after high nighttime stress.

A critical consideration with Nagina 22 and its derivative lines, however, is to improve its naturally high grain chalkiness. Cloning and analysis of Chalk5, a major chalk region of DNA in rice, opens a route to reducing chalkiness by gene editing, she noted.

“Our goal is to get more production and more flavorful taste when it comes to rice, but quality of the grain is important,” Srivastava said.

Warmer nights

National and regional studies indicate a nighttime warming trend in the United States. According to the Fifth National Climate Assessment released in 2023, “nighttime temperatures and winter temperatures have warmed more rapidly than daytime and summer temperatures.”

A 2021 study with input from researchers at Arkansas State University and the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service’s Delta Water Management Research Unit in Jonesboro showed an increase of about 1-degree Fahrenheit (0.53 Celsius) in Arkansas’s seasonal night air temperature between 1940 and 2018. The study was titled “Significant Shift of Ambient Night-Time Air Temperature during Rice Growing Season in Major US Rice States.”

To learn more about the Division of Agriculture research, visit the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station website. Follow us on X at @ArkAgResearch, subscribe to the Food, Farms and Forests podcast and sign up for our monthly newsletter, the Arkansas Agricultural Research Report. To learn more about the Division of Agriculture, visit uada.edu. Follow us on X at @AgInArk. To learn about extension programs in Arkansas, contact your local Cooperative Extension Service agent or visit uaex.uada.edu.

About the Division of Agriculture

The University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture’s mission is to strengthen agriculture, communities, and families by connecting trusted research to the adoption of best practices. Through the Agricultural Experiment Station and the Cooperative Extension Service, the Division of Agriculture conducts research and extension work within the nation’s historic land grant education system.

The Division of Agriculture is one of 20 entities within the University of Arkansas System. It has offices in all 75 counties in Arkansas and faculty on three system campuses.

The University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture offers all its Extension and Research programs and services without regard to race, color, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, national origin, religion, age, disability, marital or veteran status, genetic information, or any other legally protected status, and is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer.

# # #

Media Contact: John Lovett
U of A System Division of Agriculture
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station
(479) 763-5929
jlovett@uada.edu

 SEX ED WORKS! NEEDED K-12 GLOBALLY

The gold standard of a randomized controlled study among NYC girls indicates that a book on puberty can lead to significant gains in knowledge and positive health outcomes




Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health




January 15, 2025-- Young girls in the New York metropolitan area given a book on puberty and periods were more likely to have increased knowledge related to these topics after reading the book according to a new study at Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health. Girls in this group were also more likely to report positive shifts in beliefs and attitudes towards physical activity during their period and about asking questions about menstruation compared to a control group of girls who were given an alternate book on healthy eating. The study is the first to evaluate learning outcomes associated with reading an illustrated educational book on puberty and periods written for girls in the U.S. The findings are published in the journal BMC Public Health.

“Our aim was to evaluate the immediate impacts of an illustrated book on puberty and periods for girls and to explore a simple approach for delivering puberty content sin after-school programs that would not require a significant influx of resources or capacity.,” said Angela-Maithy Nguyen, a former postdoctoral student in sociomedical sciences at Columbia Mailman School, and first author. “The study contributes to filling the gap in understanding the utility of puberty education in the U.S. and underscores the importance of appropriately timed puberty education.”

Findings from the illustrated book, which integrated first period stories and experiences of low income and underrepresented girls, showed that the girls who were randomly assigned to read the puberty book -- independently and without instruction -- experienced an overall increase in knowledge, specifically related to physical body changes, types of period products, and safety of exercise during one’s period. 

“We know that during puberty, girls experience particular challenges. Black and Hispanic girls, and girls from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds, often experience earlier pubertal onset which particularly is associated with poorer body image, lower self-esteem, psychological distress, and poor academic performance,” observes Marni Sommer, DrPH, RN, professor of Sociomedical Sciences at Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health, and senior author. “Inadequate knowledge of early menstruation may also lead to adverse health outcomes. Unfortunately, puberty education is falling short in the U.S. with puberty topics taught in less than half of elementary and middle schools.”

Using a randomized trial approach, the researchers conducted an educational intervention between February-May 2023, and studied 123 girls ages 9-12 years in after-school programs in the New York metropolitan area. Girls were assigned to read a book on puberty and periods or an alternative book on healthy eating. The authors further examined changes in knowledge, beliefs/attitudes, and comfort in communicating about puberty and periods between treatment groups using pre- and post-test surveys. They also assessed if changes in knowledge about puberty and periods differed by menarchal status.

The majority of participants were 11 years old (27 percent) and in the sixth grade (28 percent). Nearly 40 percent of girls self-identified as Hispanic or Latina and approximately 30 percent of girls self-identified as Non-Hispanic Black. Slightly over 50 percent of participants had not had their first period at the time of study. Nearly half of participants expressed interest in learning more about topics related to puberty and menstruation (48 percent).

On average, girls who read the puberty book had an 8 percent increase in an overall knowledge score compared to those who read the alternative book. Those who had not yet had their period had an average 12 percent increase in knowledge, a significant difference compared to those who already had their period.

“Our study’s novel findings contribute to the limited research on supplemental puberty education and its impacts on girls’ knowledge and attitudes towards puberty, and while a plethora of related books written for girls in the U.S. have existed in the last few decades, there have been few, if any, rigorous evaluations conducted of their content or delivery,” noted Nguyen.

Findings from our educational intervention support our main hypothesis that a simple distribution of an illustrated puberty and period book among girls ages 9–12 years, without the support of formal instruction, had positive impacts on girls’ knowledge, beliefs and attitude shifts,” said Sommer, who also leads the Gender, Adolescent Transitions and Environment (GATE) Program at Columbia Mailman. “The intervention was effectual in improving knowledge, particularly among girls who had not yet experienced their first period and underscores the importance of targeting earlier learning for pubertal health education. We recommend continued assessment of the long-term health and social impacts of this simple delivery of pubertal content to adolescents.”

A co-author is Micaela Camozzi, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health.

Funding to support the study was provided by the Sid and Helaine Lerner MHM Faculty Support Fund.

Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health

Founded in 1922, the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health pursues an agenda of research, education, and service to address the critical and complex public health issues affecting New Yorkers, the nation and the world. The Columbia Mailman School is the third largest recipient of NIH grants among schools of public health. Its nearly 300 multi-disciplinary faculty members work in more than 100 countries around the world, addressing such issues as preventing infectious and chronic diseases, environmental health, maternal and child health, health policy, climate change and health, and public health preparedness. It is a leader in public health education with more than 1,300 graduate students from 55 nations pursuing a variety of master’s and doctoral degree programs. The Columbia Mailman School is also home to numerous world-renowned research centers, including ICAP and the Center for Infection and Immunity. For more information, please visit www.mailman.columbia.edu.

 

Instagram motherhood influencers very often share kids’ images, apparently without safety concerns



In study of UK motherhood influencers, 3 in 4 posts feature kids, half of which may be linked to sponsorship and financial gain



PLOS

Sharing images of children on social media: British motherhood influencers and the privacy paradox 

image: 

Instagram motherhood influencers very often share kids’ images, apparently without safety concerns.

view more 

Credit: Pixabay, CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)



A study of 10 British motherhood influencers suggests they often deliberately share pictures of their children on Instagram, with strong trust in the safety of doing so. Katherine Baxter of Liverpool Hope University, U.K., and Barbara Czarnecka of London South Bank University, U.K., present these findings in the open-access journal PLOS One on January 15, 2025.

With the rise of social media influencers, the popularity of many who engage in sharing images of their children—“sharenting”—has raised concerns about whether such actions compromise children’s privacy rights. Sharenting has been linked with a number of potential harms for children, such as future psychological impacts, bullying, and personal information being accessible to pedophiles.

However, little is known about the extent to which sharenting occurs, and most studies of motherhood influencers have relied on surveys about their posting habits without examining actual posting practices. To address that gap, Baxter and Czarnecka surveyed 10 British motherhood influencers, each with more than 10,000 Instagram followers, and analyzed 5,253 of their posts made between August 2020 and July 2021.

Over 75 percent of the posts featured children, and of those, 46.4 percent included sponsorships and product advertisements, suggesting that images of kids are often used for financial gain. Posts featuring children with images or text containing embarrassing, intimate, or revealing information were relatively rare, at 11.5 percent. Notably, whether a post featured children or not was unrelated to the number of “likes” it received.

Prior research has suggested the existence of a “privacy paradox,” where people’s stated concerns about online privacy do not align with their posting behavior. In this study, participants tended to express strong trust in the safety of posting on Instagram and reported they were either indifferent to or willing to engage in sharenting, suggesting they may deliberately post their kids’ pictures. This apparent lack of concern does not support the privacy paradox.

The researchers note that larger studies will be needed to confirm their findings and deepen understanding. Meanwhile, they call for new legislation to protect children online, such as, for instance, a ban on sharenting or automatic blocking of children’s images on social media.

The authors add: "Motherhood influencers shared images of their children in over 75% of the 5,253 posts analyzed, with only 11.5% containing embarrassing, intimate, or revealing content. These influencers expressed strong trust in online safety on Instagram and showed indifference or willingness toward sharenting, indicating that sharing images of their children may be a deliberate strategy rather than an accidental act."

 

 

In your coverage, please use this URL to provide access to the freely available article in PLOS Onehttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314472

Citation: Baxter K, Czarnecka B (2025) Sharing images of children on social media: British motherhood influencers and the privacy paradox. PLoS ONE 20(1): e0314472. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314472

Author countries: U.K.

Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.


In Marvel and DC movies, (AND COMICS) rough childhoods do not doom characters to become villains


Study highlights use of unconventional approaches to explore trauma and child development




PLOS

Are adverse childhood experiences scores associated with heroism or villainy? A quantitative observational study of Marvel and DC Cinematic Universe characters 

image: 

In Marvel and DC movies, rough childhoods do not doom characters to become villains.

view more 

Credit: Ivan Rohovchenko, Unsplash, CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)




In a study of characters from the Marvel and DC cinematic universes, the amount of potentially traumatic events a character experienced in childhood—as measured with a real-life questionnaire—had no bearing on whether they were a hero or villain. Julia Wigmore of the University of Calgary, Canada, and colleagues present these findings in the open-access journal PLOS One on January 15, 2025.

The adverse childhood experiences (ACE) questionnaire is widely used by researchers and clinicians to tally potentially traumatic events that can occur during childhood, such as abuse or neglect. A higher ACE score indicates a more challenging childhood and has been linked to a greater risk of health problems.

Popular media, including superhero films, often feature characters influenced by rough childhoods. Since superhero films are watched by millions of people, Wigmore and colleagues surmise that such portrayals might influence how people perceive the real-world impact of ACEs. To better understand the portrayal of ACEs in superhero movies, they watched 33 Marvel or DC movies and used the ACE questionnaire to score 19 male characters, 8 female, and 1 gender fluid, based on the films’ portrayals of their childhoods. The study included such characters as Batman, Spiderman, Black Widow, and Wonder Woman.

The analysis found no statistically significant link between ACE scores and whether a character was a hero or villain; each group included characters with a range of ACE scores, suggesting that in these films, adverse childhood experiences did not doom characters to become villains. ACE scores also did not differ significantly between male and female characters or between DC and Marvel films.

These findings align with the real-world idea that ACE scores may not predict deviant behaviors but instead may indicate potential risks and illuminate areas where extra support could help. The study also exemplifies an unconventional approach to explore representations of childhood trauma.

Further research is needed to understand potential implications of this study for children who watch superhero films, such as whether superheroes with rough childhoods could be effective role models. Future studies could also address limitations of this study, such as by incorporating additional—particularly female— characters, exploring psychological factors beyond ACEs, and addressing the challenge of classifying certain characters as heroes versus villains.

The authors add: “Our study found that anyone could be a superhero, regardless of their childhood, gender, or cinematic universe. We hope that children will be inspired by superheroes who have overcome challenges to be resilient in their own lives.” 

 

 

Author interview: https://plos.io/3PqtaYq

In your coverage, please use this URL to provide access to the freely available article in PLOS Onehttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0315268

Citation: Wigmore J, Ahmed B, Joaquino G, Jaibeeh Barah E, Upal Z, Boring T, et al. (2025) Are adverse childhood experiences scores associated with heroism or villainy? A quantitative observational study of Marvel and DC Cinematic Universe characters. PLoS ONE 20(1): e0315268. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315268

Author countries: Canada

Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

 

2% of surveyed Californian men report perpetrating intimate partner violence in the past year, and those with more patriarchal, less gender equitable beliefs are significantly more likely to report being perpetrators



PLOS




 

Article URLhttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0315293

Article title: Are men’s gender equality beliefs associated with self-reported intimate partner violence perpetration? A state-level analysis of California men

Author countries: Canada, US

Funding: This work was supported by Blue Shield of California Foundation (https://blueshieldcafoundation.org) #COV-2207-18216 (AR) and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (https://www.gatesfoundation.org/) #INV002967 (AR). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection or analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.