Friday, February 21, 2025

 

Hawaiian parasitic flies develop better hearing to locate host crickets



St. Olaf College
A Pacific field cricket and Hawaiian parasitic fly 

image: 

A Pacific field cricket and Hawaiian parasitic fly next to each other.

view more 

Credit: Photo courtesy of the University of Denver and St. Olaf College




Research from St. Olaf College and the University of Denver, published in Current Biology, found that a parasitic fly in Hawaii has evolved to eavesdrop on the mating calls of Pacific field crickets. The flies were likely introduced to the Islands by Polynesian settlers and European cargo ships.

The research found that in Hawaii, the acoustic parasitoid fly has quickly evolved more sensitive hearing across a range of sound frequencies that are prominent in recently evolved and rapidly changing cricket calling songs. This adaptation improves the flies’ ability to locate hosts for their larvae, increasing their chances of survival. 

“It's important to understand how the sensory systems of eavesdroppers evolve because it reveals the fascinating ways animals adapt to survive and thrive,” said co-corresponding and co-senior author Norman Lee, an associate professor of biology at St. Olaf and the director of the Neuroscience Program. “Eavesdroppers, like flies that listen in on cricket songs, show how some species develop incredible abilities to detect sounds or signals that aren't meant for them.”

In previous studies, co-corresponding and co-senior author Robin Tinghitella, an associate professor of biology at the University of Denver, found that some male Pacific field crickets were evolving new songs through wing mutations, so as not to become prey to carrying the larvae of female Ormia ochracea, the parasitic flies. In turn, the parasitic flies have improved in their ability to find the location of male crickets for the larvae to incubate and develop in –– leading to the decline of crickets that do not have novel songs.  

“This now appears to be a classic example of adaptation and counteradaptation, back and forth, between the crickets and flies,” Tinghitella said. “Will the crickets evolve new songs, yet again, to evade the parasitic flies? Will the flies develop new ways of finding hosts? We can’t wait to see what will happen next.”

Building off of previous academic work, the team collected Ormia ochracea flies from Hawaii and Florida as a comparison population. The research team ran two experiment types, behavioral and neural, that focused on measuring the female parasitic flies’ response to cricket song types (such as purring, rattling, and typical). They found that Hawaiian flies had developed a more sensitive auditory system, allowing them to better locate these novel songs. In the field, they found that while the parasitic flies in Hawaii preferred the louder typical cricket songs, they were still able to detect the less intense purring and rattling songs. 

“This research also helps us understand broader questions, like how animals navigate their environments, find food, or avoid predators,” Lee said. “Plus, the unique strategies these eavesdroppers use can inspire innovations in technology. In essence, it’s about uncovering the hidden ways nature works and using that knowledge to benefit science and society.”

The research team recommends future studies to compare the neural threshold of the Hawaiian fly and cricket populations. Further research will help to better understand if female crickets’ auditory systems have evolved to better detect new songs by the males. 

This research was funded by the National Science Foundation, from their Division of Integrative Organismal Systems and Division of Environmental Biology; an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship; and the Collaborative Undergraduate Research and Inquiry (CURI) program at St. Olaf. The research team was composed of faculty and graduate students from St. Olaf and the University of Denver. 

Through CURI, this work received undergraduate research support from Mikayla Carlson 23 and Mackenzie Farrell 23 in the summer of 2022 and Quang Vu 25 in the summer of 2023. “Engaging in cutting-edge, hands-on research allows St. Olaf undergraduates to apply their coursework, develop transferable technical skills, and experience how science is truly done while contributing to meaningful discoveries,” Lee said. 

-30-
 

Previous studies from the research team include: 

 

The rising tide of sand mining: a growing threat to marine life


Michigan State University
Sand Mining Barge 

image: 

Sand Mining Barge on Kuala Langat River, Selangor, Malaysia

view more 

Credit: Khairil Yusof, Creative Commons




In the delicate balancing act between human development and protecting the fragile natural world, sand is weighing down the scales on the human side.

A group of international scientists in this week’s journal One Earth are calling for balancing those scales to better identify the significant damage sand extraction across the world heaps upon marine biodiversity. The first step: acknowledging sand and gravel (discussed as sand in this publication) – the world’s most extracted solid materials by mass – are a threat hiding in plain sight.

“Sand is a critical resource that shapes the built and natural worlds,” said senior author Jianguo “Jack” Liu, Michigan State University Rachel Carson Chair in Sustainability. “Extracting sand is a complex global challenge. Systems approaches such as the metacoupling framework are essential to untangle the complexity. They can help reveal the hidden cascading impacts not only on the sand extraction sites but also other places such as sand transport routes and sites using sand for construction.”

Sand is the literal foundation of human development across the globe, a key ingredient of concrete, asphalt, glass, and electronics. It is relatively cheap and easily extracted. 

Unlike critical minerals or deep-sea mining — both of which have attracted significant scrutiny—sand extraction in marine environments remains largely overlooked, despite sand and sediment dredging being the second most widespread human activity in coastal areas after fishing, and its supply is often taken for granted. 

Sand mining across the world is being linked to coastal erosion, habitat destruction, the spread of invasive species and impacts on fisheries. Extracting sand can harm marine life by clouding water and riling sediment that can smother seagrasses and coral.  Disrupting spans of ocean sand can fragment habitat, change the patterns of waves and other issues that can throw marine life into disarray.

“This resource is often seen as an inert, abundant material, but in reality, it is an essential resource that shapes coastal and marine ecosystems, protects shorelines, and sustains ecosystems and livelihoods,” said lead author Aurora Torres, a researcher at Spain’s University of Alicante. “Since sand extraction is closely linked to coastal erosion, climate adaptation, and biodiversity loss, integrating it into broader environmental policies—such as marine protected areas, blue carbon strategies, climate resilience plans, and strategic natural resource management—is crucial to ensuring it is not treated as an isolated issue.”

Torres and Liu first brought the issues of sand to light in 2017 in the Science paper A looming tragedy of the sand commons.  In the One Earth commentary, the two, former and current members of MSU’s Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability, call for sand to be elevated to the attention levels of fishing, aquaculture and tourism in the scale of global attention and action.

“Ultimately, the key to action is making sand extraction visible—through stronger data, improved governance, and direct links to pressing environmental and economic concerns. The more evident and tangible its impacts become, the harder it will be to ignore the need for responsible management,” Torres said, adding sand extraction near fragile populated coastlines can spur action as climate change exacerbates threats to human life.

“Reducing Sand Mining’s Growing Toll on Marine Biodiversity” is also written by Jean-Baptiste 

 

Study highlights successes of Virginia’s oyster restoration efforts




Virginia Institute of Marine Science
Oyster Shells 

image: 

Spreading oyster shells on top of existing reefs provides new habitat on which juvenile oysters attach and helps maintain the reef’s structure after commercial harvests. Photo by Alexandria Marquardt.

view more 

Credit: Alexandria Marquardt




Virginia has made significant investments in the restoration of oyster reefs in the Chesapeake Bay, and now a study led by William & Mary’s Batten School & VIMS suggests those management practices are literally paying off in the Rappahannock River. The study, recently published in the Journal of Environmental Management, was led by Batten School of Coastal & Marine Sciences Ph.D. student Alexandria Marquardt, who presented the results to the Virginia Marine Resources Commission’s (VMRC) Shellfish Management Advisory Committee on February 19. 

In addition to supporting local economies, oysters filter the surrounding water removing algae and excess nutrients while clumping together to form large reefs that serve as habitat for many fish and marine animals. Though once abundant, oyster populations in the Chesapeake Bay collapsed in the mid-1980s due to a combination of overfishing and disease. While Virginia Institute of Marine Science has endeavored to increase wild oysters’ resistance to virulent pathogens, the VMRC regulates the fishery in Virginia and oversees efforts to restore oyster reefs. 

“Oyster restoration typically focuses on shell replenishment, in which oyster shells are spread over existing reefs on which juvenile oysters attach and grow. This was an exciting project, because it was the first to evaluate the benefits of replenishment activities both biologically and for the fishery,” said Marquardt, who collaborated on the study with faculty and scientists at the Batten School & VIMS and the VMRC. “Oyster reefs located in public fishing grounds are largely not studied, but we saw significant benefits from even modest replenishment. When combined with rotational harvests, the underlying reef structure was maintained and commercial harvests increased.”

The study showed that the density of juvenile oysters known as spat increased immediately following shell replenishment while the density of market-sized oysters peaked three years after, reinforcing the VMRC’s current 3-year rotational harvest protocol. Spat density, though highly variable, was highest in years coinciding with higher brown shell volumes, a measurement of reef health that refers to the amount of oysters and shell above the bottom sediment layer. Marine protected areas were shown to have higher market oyster densities and offer protection from commercial fishing for larger oysters, which may provide a valuable spawning function for the fishery.

VMRC began their shell replenishment program in 2000 and implemented rotational harvests in 2007. These practices have resulted in steady increases in brown shell volume throughout the Rappahannock River and increased the likelihood of watermen meeting daily harvest limits. Overall, the study showed that oyster harvests steadily increased with the improvement of the oyster reefs, with market oyster densities increasing substantially since 2018. 

Since the 2007-2008 harvest season, more than 500,000 bushels of oysters valued at more than $24 million were harvested from the Rappahannock River. The VMRC has invested more than $14 million toward replenishment in the river since 2000.

“It’s rewarding to see that science-based management of this fishery is providing benefits for both the environment and local economies,” said Marquardt. “I’m thankful for the opportunity to work with the VMRC and contribute to a sustainable oyster industry in Virginia.”

View a summary of the study.


The results of the study showed that oyster management practices in the Rappahannock River provide significant biological and commercial benefits.

Credit

Alexandria Marquardt

 

Optimism can encourage healthy habits





Syracuse University
Syracuse University Researcher Jeewon Oh 

image: 

Syracuse University Researcher Jeewon Oh

view more 

Credit: Syracuse University




Do you see the glass as half empty or half full? If you rewind to the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, chances are you experienced some level of pessimism. And who could blame you? With social isolation, health concerns and economic uncertainty, fear and anxiety became a daily reality for many.

A team of researchers from Syracuse University and Michigan State University recently explored the personal characteristics that help people handle prolonged stressors, such as the pandemic. Led by Jeewon Oh, assistant professor of psychology in Syracuse University’s College of Arts and Sciences, the group delved into optimism and pessimism and how those mindsets influence well-being.

The group utilized data from the Health and Retirement Study, a large-scale panel study that gathers a nationally representative sample of Americans aged 50 and older (Sonnega et al., 2014). In 2016, participants responded to questions assessing their levels of optimism, such as “In uncertain times, I usually expect the best,” and pessimism, such as “I hardly ever expect things to go my way.” During the COVID-19 pandemic (between March and May 2020), respondents answered questions on health-related behaviors that either increased or reduced the risk of COVID transmission, including masking frequency, travel habits and the likelihood of staying home.

The team used this data to explore how people’s mindsets affected their psychological and physical well-being during challenging times. Among their findings, they found that greater optimism promotes resilience and well-being when faced with stressors like the pandemic, while lower pessimism is linked to safer health behaviors. Their findings appeared in the Journal of Research in Personality.

In the following Q&A, Professor Jeewon Oh shares some key insights from their research.

What was the motivation for this study?

Jeewon Oh (JO): The pandemic introduced many changes, and we wanted to know more about personality traits that can help people cope with enduring and uncontrollable stressors like the pandemic. We examined optimism, because it motivates action. Since optimists view stressful situations positively, they are more likely to directly address the issue or try to adapt when things are uncontrollable.

What were the benefits for those who were more optimistic? How did optimism/pessimism correlate with well-being during the pandemic?

(JO): Both optimism and pessimism had independent associations with psychological well-being. So, people who are more optimistic and less pessimistic worried less, were less stressed and lonely and were more resilient. This was partly because these people engaged in more physical activity and perceived more social support and less strain from their relationships.

Interestingly, when it came to COVID/health-relevant behaviors, pessimism played a significant role, but optimism didn’t. In other words, individuals with a less pessimistic mindset (but not a more optimistic mindset), who have weaker negative expectations tended to engage in less risky behaviors, such as traveling, and more activities at home ranging from watching TV and gardening to meditating.

How does optimism or pessimism influence the way people approach challenges and setbacks?

(JO): In general, regular optimism/pessimism isn't about thinking they wouldn't get sick, or they will be more likely to get sick (compared to others), but about knowing the reality and still thinking that things will eventually work out. This positive mindset helps people to problem-solve and cope. Afterall, if you think things would never work out, why would you even try?

Is there a way to boost one’s optimism during times when they may be more anxious, like during the pandemic?

(JO): It can be easier to think about doing what optimists do rather than trying to think differently (or change your optimism). So, people with lower pessimism mentioned changing their behaviors to adapt to the situation, meeting with people on Zoom more frequently and exercising at home (vs. going to the gym and meeting up with people in person). It was these changes in behaviors like exercising more that partly helped people's well-being.

What does this study reveal about health and psychological well-being in the post-pandemic world? What factors can we consider for maintaining and improving mental health?

(JO): There has been evidence before the pandemic that optimistic people fare well in many situations. Even though more research is needed to understand why, our study found that optimists fared better even during new difficulties. Therefore, developing optimism and learning how to flexibly cope can help maintain and improve mental health in diverse situations.

 

Solving the case of the missing platinum




DOE/SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Platinum cathode 

image: 

A top-view visualization of a platinum surface during cathode corrosion. Platinum and hydrogen atoms are represented in black and white, respectively. Blue and purple triangles indicate where hydrogen atoms have been bound to platinum atoms.

view more 

Credit: Selwyn Hanselman/Leiden University




For nearly two decades, scientists have tried to understand how negatively polarized platinum electrodes corrode, a costly mystery that plagues water electrolyzers, a promising energy technology for making hydrogen, as well as electrochemical sensors using platinum electrodes.

Now, a close collaboration between researchers at the Department of Energy’s SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory and the Leiden University has finally identified the culprit, potentially paving the way for cheaper hydrogen energy production and more reliable electrochemical sensors. The results were published in Nature Materials.

Electrolyzers and many other electrochemical devices often rely on negatively polarized platinum electrodes submerged in an electrolyte – essentially saltwater. That’s an expensive but durable and generally stable option, “but being quite stable doesn't mean it doesn't degrade," says Dimosthenis Sokaras, a senior scientist at Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource (SSRL) and the SLAC team’s principal investigator.

For most metals, being negatively polarized protects against corrosion. But platinum electrodes can rapidly break down under these conditions, a strange quirk that has puzzled scientists.

"If you take a piece of platinum and you apply a very negative potential, you can dissolve your platinum in a matter of minutes," says Marc Koper, a professor of catalysis and surface chemistry at Leiden University, and the Leiden team's principal investigator.

Two prominent theories had attempted to explain this process. Some scientists thought that sodium ions from the electrolyte solution were to blame. These ions, the thinking went, pushed their way into the platinum’s atomic lattice and formed platinides – platinum atoms lugging around positively-charged sodium ions – that peel away. Others suggested a similar process but pointed the finger at sodium and hydrogen ions – that is, protons – working together to produce platinum hydrides instead.

The research team knew they would need to somehow observe platinum as it was corroding in an electrolyte while making lots of hydrogen. To do so, the team turned to SSRL where researchers have developed high-energy-resolution X-ray spectroscopy techniques that could penetrate the electrolyte and filter out other effects, allowing the researchers to focus in on subtle changes in the platinum electrode in operando, or during operation.

"High-energy-resolution X-ray absorption spectroscopy, for us, was the only technique we could come up with that could sort of deal with the experimental conditions," said SLAC scientist Thom Hersbach.

In addition, the team developed a special “flow cell,” Sokaras said, that could clear hydrogen bubbles that form during the electrode’s operation and interfere with the X-ray experiment.

Using those capabilities together, the team made the first ever observations of platinum actively corroding, recording X-ray spectra from the negatively polarized electrode's surface.

Prior to running the experiment, the researchers had a hunch that hydrides were to blame for the corrosion, but it took several years of analyzing the data before they could prove this hypothesis.

"It just took loads and loads of different iterations of trying to figure out 'how do we accurately capture what's going on?'" Hersbach said.

Using computational models of platinum hydrides and platinides, the researchers simulated the spectra they would expect to see from each structure under the SSRL X-ray beam. Comparing the numerous simulated spectra with the results of their experiment confirmed that only platinum hydride could have produced their results. “By advancing the frontiers of X-ray science, SSRL has developed operando methods that, combined with modern supercomputing, now allow us to tackle decades-old scientific questions,” Sokaras said.

Now, the team's findings can be used to develop solutions for platinum corrosion in electrolyzers and many other electrochemical devices. The project, Koper says, "shows how important in science it is to put a lot of expertise together."

SSRL is a DOE Office of Science user facility.