Saturday, November 22, 2025

Plant breeding discovery could pave way for new crop species



UMass Amherst researcher integral part of international team that identified a specific pollen signal from the cabbage family governing species recognition




University of Massachusetts Amherst

UMass Amherst Distinguished Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Alice Cheung 

image: 

UMass Amherst Distinguished Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Alice Cheung

view more 

Credit: UMass Amherst





AMHERST, Mass. — One of the great mysteries in plant biology is how, given the clouds of pollen released by dozens of plants species all at the same time, an individual plant can recognize which particular species’ pollen grains will induce fertility and which to reject. We are now one step closer to solving the mystery thanks to research recently published in Science by an international team from the University of Massachusetts Amherst and China’s Shandong Agricultural University.

Many flowering plants have evolved what’s known as “self-incompatibility,” or the inability to mate with itself and close relatives. In this way, a plant can avoid the pitfalls of inbreeding. But what about the pollen from species that are more distantly related, yet within the same family?

UMass Amherst’s Alice Cheung, Distinguished Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at UMass Amherst and one of the paper’s senior authors and a key member of the team that used the Brassicaceae family of plants—which includes cabbages, broccoli, kale, turnips, the oil crop canola and other common vegetables—to study the poorly understood mechanism of “interspecific incompatibility,” or ISI, which is what keeps pollen from broccoli from fertilizing kale and producing a hybrid species—kale-occoli. The problem is that breeding between distantly related relatives to generate new species with and improved or a wider range of traits is beneficial to agricultural crops and thus food security.

The molecular workings of ISI unfortunately remain “very much a black box, compared with what we know about self-incompatibility systems and their mechanisms,” says Cheung.

Cheung and her colleagues have made great strides in understanding how ISI works in the current study and even introduced a strategy for crossing distantly related species within Brassicaceae.

The team’s breakthrough involves how plants of different species communicate during the pollination process, either accepting or rejecting pollen grains. A protein called SRK, the key protein known to control self-incompatibility in the Brassica stigma—the tip of the pistil which constitutes the pollen-reception surface of the female reproductive organ—recognizes a specific chemical signal, called SIPS, on pollen from a different Brassica species, such as from the model Brassica Arabidopsis, that it wants to reject. But this is only half the story.

The SIPS-SRK pair then recruits another enzyme, FERONIA, which both Cheung and co-senior author Qiaohong Duan, from Shandong Agricultural University, have a long history in studying. The FERONIA/SIPS-SRK interaction then creates a highly reactive chemical known as ROS, which essentially blocks the pollen from entering the pistil. Furthermore, Cheung and her colleagues’ suggest a breeding strategy to overcome Brassicae pollen’s incompatibility, which could hasten success in crosses between distantly related species in the same family.


 

Study finds Indigenous-led hunting most effective for tackling deer overabundance on B.C. islands



UBC-led research says the approach delivers the strongest ecological and cultural outcomes




University of British Columbia

Dr. Tara Martin 

image: 

Dr. Tara Martin

view more 

Credit: UBC




As ecosystems in coastal British Columbia disappear due to long-term browsing pressures from overabundant black-tailed deer, a new study led by UBC with Coast Salish Nations and regional research partners identifies the most effective solutions to address deer overabundance on the Southern Gulf Islands.

The research, published in People and Naturefinds Indigenous-led hunting to be the most successful and cost-effective strategy for managing hyperabundant deer when considering ecological and cultural needs. Drawing on both Indigenous and Western knowledge systems, the study also highlights the importance of honoring distinct knowledge and value systems equitably in wildlife management.

A growing ecological crisis

Following almost two decades of research led by Dr. Tara Martin from UBC’s Faculty of Forestry, black-tailed deer populations on the Southern Gulf Islands are now estimated to be up to 10 times higher than they were a century ago, due to a combination of human-altered landscapes, restrictions on hunting, and the eradication of predators.

As deer populations grow unchecked, they overbrowse vegetation, prevent forests from regenerating, reduce biodiversity, and disrupt cultural connections to the land.

“For most people these islands look beautiful and natural, but they are entirely degraded,” says Dr. Martin. “The change has been so slow, most people don’t recognize this shift. We’ve found hyperabundant deer are one of the major drivers of this change.”

The consequences are stark. One of B.C.’s most endangered ecosystems, the Garry Oak meadow, is now at risk of irreversible collapse due to overgrazing. Other regions across Canada and the globe are facing similar threats from hyperabundant herbivores including Haida Gwaii, Ontario, Australia, New Zealand and New Caledonia.

Inclusive approach to decision-making

Developing deer management strategies that address overpopulation and also support the well-being of people and the land—rather than focusing solely on ecology—is inherently complex.

“This study offers a roadmap to help unpack complicated problems where many values and goals compete, often leading to decision paralysis and inaction” says lead author and doctoral student Sofie McComb. “Hyperabundant deer are damaging ecosystems around the world, and we’re offering a framework that gives decision-makers practical, inclusive solutions.”

Working in collaboration with Coast Salish Nations and local land stewards and knowledge holders, Dr. Martin’s group considered a number of strategies for successful deer management. These included Indigenous-led hunting, improving predator viability, hiring deer reduction specialists, using birth control, increasing licensed hunting, and combining approaches.

Indigenous-led hunting was the only strategy with a high likelihood of being successful and achieving ecological and cultural benefits. Compared to the status quo, Indigenous-led hunting was found to increase the likelihood of maximizing human and ecological wellbeing by almost 60 per cent, and was more than 50 per cent likely to maximize project uptake and implementation goals.

Strategies such as increased licensed hunting were cost-effective from a Western science perspective, as they are low-cost strategies with moderate feasibility, but were less likely to achieve meaningful long-term benefits (less than 30 per cent likelihood).

Cost of inaction

Experts agreed that sticking with the status quo will not improve ecosystem functions and will continue to feed the decision-making paralysis fuelled by a fear of controversy. Researchers warn that delaying action is the most harmful option.

“If we don’t do something soon, the ecosystems will not be recoverable, because there will be nothing left” says Sofie McComb. “The deer are also struggling, and have turned to eating starvation foods. Inaction is action – that is the action that has been chosen and the ecosystem is suffering.”

The study provides an inclusive, transparent framework for communities worldwide facing hyperabundant herbivores. By integrating multiple knowledge systems and weighing feasibility and cost alongside ecological and cultural benefits, decision-makers can chart a path toward recovery that is both effective and socially grounded.

“It’s possible to find solutions to complex environmental issues that are good for people, the land and the deer” says Dr. Martin. “This work shows that restoring cultural sovereignty and ecosystem health can go hand in hand.”

Camera trap image of black-tailed deer grazing

Credit

Tara Martin

 

High prevalence of artificial skin lightening in under 5 yr olds, Nigerian survey suggests



80% of respondents’ children exposed to skin bleaching products were under 2 years old; Aesthetic preferences trumped knowledge of health risks, responses indicated



BMJ Group





A significant proportion of under 5s in Nigeria may be being exposed to skin lightning products, if the results of a semi-urban community survey are indicative, suggests research published in the open access journal BMJ Open.

 

Most (80%) of the respondents’ children exposed to skin bleaching products were under 2 years old, and despite good knowledge of the health risks of the practice, these were trumped by aesthetic preferences for lighter skin tones, the survey responses show.

 

The cosmetic use of skin lightening products has become increasingly common globally, with very high rates among women of reproductive age in Africa, note the researchers. And while the practice used to be associated only with poverty, youth, and female sex, this is now no longer the case, they add.

 

Of particular concern is the increasing trend of mothers using skin lightening creams on their young children who are especially vulnerable to the side effects of these products, explain the researchers.

 

This is because of their higher ratio of body surface area to weight, which increases systemic exposure, and their thinner and more permeable skin, which heightens the risk of absorption, they add.

 

And skin lightening products often contain endocrine system disruptors, such as liquorice, resveratrol, steroids, as well as heavy metals, such as mercury, they point out.

 

To better understand the prevalence and motives for the practice and inform policy to safeguard children’s health, the researchers surveyed 369 mothers with at least one child under 5 in Ile-Ife, Osun State, Southwestern Nigeria.

 

The mothers were all attending community immunisation and infant welfare clinics in three government-owned primary healthcare centres.

 

The questions aimed to find out how many of them used skin lightening creams, soaps, or lotions on their young children and to explore their knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of the pros and cons of these products.

 

Potentially influential factors, such as age, marital status, religion, income, occupation, cultural beliefs, educational attainment, personal skin colour and use of skin lightening creams, perceived social factors, and access to media were all taken into account.

 

The average age of the mothers was 30, and nearly all had attained at least secondary level education. Most (87%; 320) reported low household income. Between them, they had 792 children, ranging in age from 1 to 59 months.

 

Around 1 in 5 (19.5%;72) of the mothers said they used skin lightening creams on their children. Of these, 90% (65) applied the products routinely; the rest used them intermittently.

 

Infants and young children were the primary recipients. Over three quarters (81%; 58) of those exposed to these products were under 2 years old, with just over half (51.5%; 37) 6 months or younger.

 

Children under 2 were twice as likely to be the recipients of skin lightening attempts as older children.

 

The most frequently used agents were hydroquinone-based creams (60%; 43), followed by powerful topical steroid creams (29%; 21). 

 

Three quarters (76.5%; 55) of the mothers who used skin lightening products on their children self-identified as light skinned, and a similar proportion (75%; 54) expressed a preference for lighter complexions.

 

Most of these mothers (89%; 64) said they had used skin lightening creams on their own skin. But only just over half of them (56%; 40) perceived lighter skin as conferring social or economic advantages over darker skin tones.

 

The most frequently cited reasons for the use of skin lightening products were to improve the child’s complexion (61%; 50) and to preserve or maintain what was described as the child’s natural skin colour (79%; 65).

 

Less than half (43%; 31) of the mothers cited specific perceived benefits of skin lightening, including the treatment of blemishes (8%; 6), enhancement of beauty (19.5%;14), or prevention of darkening from sun exposure (6%; 4).

 

Almost all the respondents (97%) were aware of the health risks associated with these products, and most (81%;58) of those using them on their children were aware of at least one serious systemic side effect associated with use.

 

One in three, (34%; 24) acknowledged the potential presence of toxic substances in some of these formulations. But they were around 4 times less likely to acknowledge specific dangers or identify complications than those who didn’t use these products.

 

“The observed disconnect between awareness of risks, recognition of specific danger and skin lightening practices indicates that social expectations and perceived advantages can outweigh safety concerns,” note the researchers.

 

Mothers who had used skin lightening creams on themselves were 15 times more likely to use them on their own children than those who didn’t report personal use, while perceiving light skin as more attractive or socially advantageous nearly doubled the odds of early childhood exposure.

 

And having a family member who practised skin lightening was also associated with a doubling in the likelihood of using one of these products on a child.

 

This is an observational study and, as such, can’t establish cause. And the researchers acknowledge that relying on survey data risks recall bias and possible under reporting through fear of judgment. And they only included mothers’ perspectives, precluding the potentially influential views of other caregivers or household members.

 

But they point out: “Beyond physical health implications, these practices also transmit colourist ideals, positioning lighter skin as a marker of beauty, self-worth, and social acceptance.”

 

They add: “Such early internalisation may adversely affect self-concept and identity, reinforcing intergenerational cycles of dissatisfaction with natural skin tone, stigma, and harmful cosmetic norms that persist across the life course.”

 

And they conclude: “The dual risk of toxic exposure and early internalisation of colourist ideals from childhood skin-lightening carry profound public health implications. While risk awareness may contribute to reducing the practice, cognitive dissonance may undermine its impact.

 

“Addressing this requires policy measures that go beyond individual risk education to challenge cultural narratives and normative pressures, alongside stronger regulatory oversight to ensure accurate labelling and restrict hazardous formulations.

 

“Culturally sensitive strategies, such as integrating skin health education into maternal child health services, leveraging immunisation visits, and engaging trusted community leaders, may offer effective avenues for change.”