Sunday, March 01, 2026

Iran’s supreme leader killed in major attack by US and Israel



Israel said Khamenei’s compound in Tehran had been destroyed. (Via AFP)Next

AP
February 28, 2026


Iran’s cabinet confirmed Ali Khamenei’s death, warned that this “great crime will never go unanswered”

US President Trump said hours earlier that Khamenei was killed in a joint American-Israeli operation targeting Iran

Tehran announces 40 days of mourning, 7 public holidays


DUBAI: Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed in a major attack by Israel and the United States, Iranian state media confirmed early Sunday, throwing the future of the Islamic Republic into doubt and raising the risk of regional instability.

President Donald Trump announced the death hours earlier, saying it gave Iranians their “greatest chance” to “take back” their country.

State media reported that the 86-year-old was killed in an airstrike targeting his compound in downtown Tehran. Satellite photos from Airbus showed the site heavily bombed.

Iran’s ‌Ali ​Shamkhani, ‌top ‌advisor ​to ‌the ⁠supreme ​leader, ⁠and ⁠Revolutionary Guards ‌commander ​Mohammed ‌Pakpour ‌have ‌also been ⁠killed, IRNA reported.

His death at his office “showed that he consistently stood among the people and at the forefront of his responsibilities, confronting what officials call global arrogance,” state TV said.

Iran’s Cabinet warned that this “great crime will never go unanswered.”

Iran State TV also confirmed on Sunday that Iran’s chief of army staff, Gen. Abdol Rahim Mousavi and Defense Minister Gen. Aziz Nasirzadeh had also been killed. 

The Iranian Revolutionary Guard also warned of “a severe, decisive and regret-inducing punishment” coming over Khamenei’s killing.

Iranians initially cheered from rooftops and their homes in Tehran, Iran’s capital, when rumors first started to spread late Saturday of Khamenei’s death.

“Khamenei, one of the most evil people in History, is dead,” Trump wrote in a social media post. He warned of “heavy and pinpoint bombing” that he said would continue throughout the week and even beyond, part of a lethal assault the US has justified as necessary to disable the country’s nuclear capabilities.

 



The attack opened a stunning new chapter in US intervention in Iran, carried the potential for retaliatory violence and a wider war, and represented a startling flex of military might for an American president who swept into office on an “America First” platform and vowed to keep out of “forever wars.”

The killing of Khamenei in the second Trump administration assault on Iran in eight months appeared certain to create a leadership vacuum given the absence of a known successor and because the 86-year-old supreme leader had final say on all major policies during his decades in power. He led Iran’s clerical establishment and its paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, the two main centers of power in the governing theocracy.

As reports trickled out about the death, eyewitnesses in Tehran told The Associated Press that some residents were rejoicing, blowing whistles and letting out ululations.

Iran, which responded to the strikes with its own counterassault, warned of retribution.

Ali Larijani, the secretary of Iran’s National Security Council, said Saturday that Israel and America will “regret their actions.”

“The brave soldiers and the great nation of Iran will deliver an unforgettable lesson to the hellish international oppressors,” Larijani posted on X.

Strikes followed months of rising tensions

The joint US-Israel operation, which officials say was planned for months, took place Saturday during the Muslim holy fasting month of Ramadan and at the start of the Iranian workweek. It followed stilted negotiations and warnings from Trump, who last year trumpeted his administration’s success in incapacitating the country’s nuclear program but nonetheless cast the latest round as necessary to head off its potential resurgence.

About 12 hours after the attacks began, the US military reported no US casualties and minimal damage at US bases despite “hundreds of Iranian missile and drone attacks.” It said targets in Iran included Revolutionary Guard command facilities, air defense systems, missile and drone launch sites, and military airfields.

Israel, for its part, said it had killed the commander of the Revolutionary Guard Corps and the country’s defense minister, as well as the secretary of the Iranian Security Council, a close adviser to Khamenei.

Khamenei “was unable to avoid our Intelligence and Highly Sophisticated Tracking Systems and, working closely with Israel, there was not a thing he, or the other leaders that have been killed along with him, could do,” Trump said. “This is the single greatest chance for the Iranian people to take back their Country.”

An Iranian diplomat told the United Nations Security Council that hundreds of civilians were killed and wounded in the strikes. Iran retaliated by firing missiles and drones toward Israel and at US military bases in the region, and exchanges of fire continued into the night.

Some of the first strikes on Iran appeared to hit near the offices of Khamenei, the second leader of the Islamic Republic who succeeded Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the leader of the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Israeli officials confirmed the death, followed by Trump.

Democrats decried that Trump had taken action without congressional authorization. White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said the administration had briefed several Republican and Democratic leaders in Congress in advance.


The strikes followed unsuccessful nuclear talks

Tensions have soared in recent weeks as the Trump administration built up the largest force of American warships and aircraft in the Middle East in decades. The president insisted he wanted a deal to constrain Iran’s nuclear program while the country struggled with growing dissent following nationwide protests.

Though Trump had pronounced the Iranian nuclear program obliterated in strikes last year, the country was rebuilding infrastructure that it had lost, according to a senior US official who spoke to reporters on condition of anonymity to discuss Trump’s decision-making process. The official said intelligence showed that Iran had developed the capability to produce its own high-quality centrifuges, an important step in developing the highly enriched uranium needed for weapons.

Iran responded to the latest strikes by launching missiles and drones toward Israel and targeting US military installations in Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar. The Israeli military said Iran fired dozens of missiles at Israel, with many intercepted. The Magen David Adom rescue service said Saturday night that a woman in the Tel Aviv area died after being wounded in an Iranian missile attack.

At least three explosions were heard Saturday evening near the Intelligence Ministry building in northern Tehran, witnesses said, adding that air defense systems had begun operating there. Israel’s military said it had begun new strikes against missile launchers and aerial defense systems in central Iran.

 

 

In southern Iran, at least 115 people were reported killed when a girls’ school was struck, and dozens more were wounded, the local governor told Iranian state TV. US Central Command spokesperson Capt. Tim Hawkins said he was “aware of reports” that a girls’ school was struck and that officials were looking into them.

Iran’s state news agency IRNA said at least 15 people were killed in the southwest, quoting the governor of the Lamerd region, Ali Alizadeh, as saying a sports hall, two residential areas and a hall near a school were hit.

Flights across the Middle East were disrupted, and air defense fire thudded over Dubai, the United Arab Emirates’ commercial capital. Shrapnel from an Iranian missile attack on the UAE capital killed one person, state media said.

Attack was coordinated between Israel and US

Israel said the operation had been planned for months with the United States. Air Force pilots struck “hundreds of targets across Iran,” Israeli military chief of staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir said in a statement.

Targets in the Israeli campaign included Iran’s military, symbols of government and intelligence targets, according to an official briefed on the operation, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss nonpublic information on the attack.

Trump acknowledged Saturday that there could be American casualties, saying “that often happens in war.” He said he was aiming to “annihilate” the Iranian navy and destroy regional proxies supported by Tehran. He called on the paramilitary Iranian Revolutionary Guard to lay down arms, saying members would be given immunity or face “certain death” if they did not.

Iran had said it hoped to avert a war, but it maintained its right to enrich uranium.

Iran has said it has not enriched since June, but it has blocked international inspectors from visiting the sites the US bombed. Satellite photos analyzed by AP have shown new activity at two of those sites, suggesting Iran is trying to assess and potentially recover material.

Trump had threatened military action but held off following Iran’s recent crackdown on protests spurred by economic grievances that evolved into a nationwide push against the ruling clerics.

The Human Rights Activists News Agency says it confirmed more than 7,000 deaths in the crackdown and is investigating thousands more. The government has acknowledged more than 3,000 killed.

Effects could extend to markets and other countries

The strikes could rattle global markets, particularly if Iran makes the Strait of Hormuz unsafe for commercial traffic. A third of worldwide oil exports transported by sea passed through the strait in 2025.

Saudi Arabia said Iran targeted its capital and eastern region in an attack that was repelled. Bahrain said a missile attack targeted the US Navy’s 5th Fleet headquarters in the island kingdom, and three buildings were damaged in the capital, Manama, and Muharraq city by drone strikes and debris from an intercepted missile.

Kuwait’s civil aviation authority said a drone targeted the main international airport, injuring several employees. Kuwait’s state-run news agency said three troops were injured by shrapnel from strikes that hit Ali Al-Salem air base. Explosions could also be heard in Qatar. Jordan said it “dealt with” 49 drones and ballistic missiles.

Iran Confirms Khamenei Killed in US-Israeli Airstrikes, Tehran Declares Mourning

Iran confirmed the killing of Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. (Photo: Illustration by Palestine Chronicle)

By Palestine Chronicle Staff  

Iran confirmed the killing of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in Israeli airstrikes, vowing retaliation as national mourning begins.

Key Developments

  • Iranian television confirmed the killing of Ali Khamenei in Israeli airstrikes.
  • Iran declared 40 days of national mourning and a week-long government closure.
  • IRGC vowed revenge, calling his death a turning point in confrontation.
  • Donald Trump confirmed the killing and pledged continued intensive bombing.
  • US officials reportedly say around 40 senior Iranian figures were killed.

Iranian State Media Confirms Killing

Iranian television confirmed early that Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, was killed in Israeli airstrikes that struck Tehran early Saturday.

According to Iranian reports, Khamenei was killed while at work his office. The Fars News Agency reported that his daughter, son-in-law, granddaughter, and daughter-in-law were also killed in the strikes.

The Iranian government declared 40 days of national mourning and ordered a seven-day closure of government offices.

Iran’s Supreme National Security Council said that “the martyrdom of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei will be the starting point for a great uprising against the world’s tyrants,” while the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps vowed to avenge his killing.

A Revolutionary Guard commander told Fars that the structure of Iran’s political system allows for immediate succession, insisting that “the assassination of leaders does not leave the slightest impact on the course of progress in this battle.”

Succession and Escalation

Khamenei, born in 1939 in Mashhad, has led the Islamic Republic since 1989, succeeding Ruhollah Khomeini. He previously served as Iran’s president from 1981 to 1989 and survived an assassination attempt in 1981 that left his right hand partially paralyzed.

During his leadership, Iran expanded its regional influence and strengthened ties with resistance movements, while advancing its nuclear and missile programs.

US President Donald Trump has linked the current operation to what he described as earlier actions, including Operation Midnight Hammer, in June 2025.

A senior US official told American media that the intensive bombing campaign is expected to last at least five days, though Trump indicated that timeline could change.

(PC, Al Mayadeen, Fars News Agency, Axios

Iran president says Khamenei killing ‘declaration of war against Muslims’



AFP
March 01, 2026

Masoud Pezeshkian says avenging the killing of the supreme leader was a right and obligation of the Islamic republic

TEHRAN: Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian said Sunday that the killing of supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in US and Israeli strikes was a “declaration of war against Muslims.”

“The assassination of the highest political authority of the Islamic Republic of Iran and a prominent leader of Shiism worldwide … is perceived as an open declaration of war against Muslims, and particularly against Shiites, everywhere in the world,” Pezeshkian said in a statement carried by state TV.

Pezeshkian said that avenging the killing of the supreme leader was a right and obligation of the Islamic republic.

“The Islamic Republic of Iran considers it its legitimate duty and right to avenge the perpetrators and masterminds of this historic crime,” said Pezeshkian.

Protests break out in Pakistan, Iraq over Khamenei’s death; 9 die in Karachi



Pakistani Shiite Muslims hold placards to condemn the US-Israel attack on Iran during a protest in Karachi on February 28, 2026. (FILE/AFP)Next


Reuters
March 01, 2026


Police say hundreds of people have stormed the US Consulate in Pakistan’s port city of Karachi

Pro-Iranian protesters also gathered outside the Green Zone in the Iraqi capital Baghdad, where the US Embassy is located



KARACHI: Pakistani police on Sunday clashed with protesters who breached the outer wall of the US ​consulate in Karachi, leaving nine people dead, following news of US and Israeli strikes on Iran that killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Pro-Iranian protesters also gathered outside the Green Zone in the Iraqi capital Baghdad, where the US Embassy is located. Videos from the scene show police repelling the protestors with tear gas as they tried to breach the heavily fortified area.

Pakistan and then Iraq have the largest Shiite Muslim populations after Iran.

In Pakistan’s southern city of Karachi, protesters had been pushed back ‌from the ‌consulate, a spokesman for the local government ​said, ‌after ⁠they ​set a ⁠vehicle ablaze outside the main gate and clashed with police.

At least nine people were killed in those clashes, police said.

Reuters reporters heard sounds of gunfire and saw teargas being fired in streets around the compound. Video footage showed a fire beneath a nearby bridge.

No casualties were reported in the street clashes.

The US Consulate ⁠in Karachi and the US Embassy Islamabad Press Office ‌did not respond to requests ‌for comment.

Large protests also occurred in ​other parts of Pakistan.

Protesters set ‌fire to a United Nations office building in the northern ‌city of Skardu, in the normally peaceful Shiite-majority Gilgit Baltistan region known for its Himalayan peaks popular with tourists.

“A large number of protesters have gathered outside the UN office in GB and burned down the building,” ‌local government spokesperson Shabbir Mir told Reuters, adding no casualties had been reported.

Earlier in the day in ⁠the central ⁠city of Lahore, hundreds of protesters gathered outside the US consulate. There were some small-scale clashes with police but no reports of violence.

“Some of the protesters tried to damage the security gate, hundreds of yards away from the Consulate. However, police stopped them without use of force,” Aqeel Raza, an eyewitness, told Reuters.

In the capital Islamabad, all roads leading to the red zone, which houses diplomatic missions and parliament, were blocked for traffic or any other public movement, police said.


Airspace closed, flights canceled as US-Iran conflict flares



PROFILES – Who Were the Iranian Officials Killed in US–Israeli Strikes?

Iran confirmed senior military leaders were killed in US–Israeli strikes. (Photos: wikimedia. Sign: Palestine Chronicle)

Iran confirmed senior military leaders were killed in US–Israeli strikes; here are the profiles of the officials reported dead.

Key Developments

  • Iran confirmed the killing of Chief of Staff Abdolrahim Mousavi and Defense Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh.
  • Ali Shamkhani and IRGC commander Mohammad Pakpour were also reported killed.
  • Several senior intelligence and defense officials were named among the dead.
  • Tehran vowed a decisive response and continuity of command.
  • Iranian officials said leadership structures allow immediate succession.

Senior Military Leadership Targeted

Iranian state television reported Sunday morning that Major General Abdolrahim Mousavi, Chief of Staff of Iran’s Armed Forces, and Defense Minister Brigadier General Aziz Nasirzadeh were killed in Saturday’s joint US–Israeli strikes.

Earlier, Iranian state media confirmed the deaths of Admiral Ali Shamkhani, Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, and Major General Mohammad Pakpour, commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

CBS News, citing intelligence and military sources, reported that approximately 40 Iranian officials were killed in the attacks.

Iranian officials stressed that constitutional and military mechanisms remain intact and that succession procedures are already underway.

Below are the profiles of the key figures reported killed.

Ali Shamkhani

Ali Shamkhani was a senior military and political figure with the rank of admiral in the IRGC. Over decades, he held several pivotal positions, including Minister of Defense and Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council.

He was appointed the first commander of the Revolutionary Guard in Khuzestan province, later commanded the Guard’s ground forces, and became deputy commander-in-chief of IRGC forces. Since 2023, he served as a political adviser to the Supreme Leader.

Shamkhani played a role in nuclear negotiations with the United States in 2025 and signed the Beijing agreement restoring relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia in 2023.

Mohammad Pakpour

Major General Mohammad Pakpour was appointed commander-in-chief of the IRGC in June 2025, succeeding Major General Hossein Salami.

Holding a doctorate in political geography, Pakpour rose through the Guard’s ranks, commanding its ground forces and the Saberin special unit before assuming overall command. Israeli officials had accused him of overseeing missile and drone operations against Israel.

Abdolrahim Mousavi

Major General Abdolrahim Mousavi had recently been appointed Chief of Staff of Iran’s Armed Forces on June 13, replacing Mohammad Bagheri, who was killed during the June war.

He had only recently assumed command of the country’s highest military structure before being reported killed in the latest strikes.

Aziz Nasirzadeh

Brigadier General Aziz Nasirzadeh joined Iran’s air force at the age of 19 and flew F-14 fighter jets during the Iran–Iraq war (1980–1988). He advanced through senior command roles and was appointed Deputy Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces in 2021.

After Masoud Pezeshkian’s election in 2024, Nasirzadeh was nominated as Minister of Defense and received parliamentary approval in August 2024 with the highest percentage of votes.

Israeli officials have alleged that he oversaw missile production and long-range weapons industries, as well as advanced defense research structures.

Salah Asadi

Salah Asadi served as head of the intelligence department in the military emergency command and was described as the senior intelligence officer within the Supreme Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces.

According to Israeli military claims, he played a central role in shaping Iran’s strategic posture toward Israel and the United States.

Mohammad Shirazi

Brigadier General Mohammad Shirazi had headed the military office of the Supreme Leader since 1989 and was consistently present alongside him.

Israeli officials claimed he was responsible for coordination between senior armed forces commanders and the Supreme Leader.

Hossein Jabal Amelian

Hossein Jabal Amelian, according to Iran International, oversaw naval industries within the IRGC structure. 

Israeli sources claimed he was involved in developing advanced weapons technologies.

Reza Mozaffari Nia

Reza Mozaffari Nia, an IRGC commander and former head of the defense research organization SPND, was described by Israeli officials as being involved in strengthening efforts related to advanced military programs.

Tehran Vows Continuity and Response

Fars News Agency quoted an IRGC commander as saying that “the assassination of commanders does not have the slightest impact on the progress of this battle,” emphasizing that the structure of the Iranian system allows for the immediate appointment of competent replacements.

Iranian officials have reiterated that the country’s military and political institutions remain operational and that the response to the killings will continue under existing command frameworks.

(PC, Iranian State Television, IRNA, Fars News Agency, CBS News)



Statement:  Condemnation of the Illegal and Unjust War on Iran by the United States



Just Peace Advocates  (CANADA) strongly condemns the imminent war on Iran planned by the United States of America. Just Peace Advocates stated that such an action is both illegal and unjust, representing a serious threat to peace and stability in the region.

The Threat of War

The United States is currently threatening to launch a devastating war on Iran in the near future. Just Peace Advocates expresses deep concern over these developments and calls for an immediate halt to any military escalation.

In the last month, the United States and Israel have made unjust demands on Iran which, if not met, a US war on Iran will ensue.

The three demands, zero uranium enrichment, curbing Iranian missile defense capacities to three hundred kilometers and ending support for the axis of resistance to the Zionist entity in western Asia. These demands are echoed by the Zionist entity, Israel.

The United States and Israel are nuclear powers and have no right to impose nuclear limits on the sovereign nation of Iran. It is common knowledge that Iran does not want nuclear arms and is ready to limit uranium enrichment with international supervision. These issues should be resolved by diplomatic means: war and the threat of war must be abandoned by the US President, Donald Trump.

Iranian missile defences are capable of hitting Israel and all American military bases in western Asia. Iran as a sovereign nation has the unalienable right to defend itself under article 51 of the United Nations Charter by any means necessary, particularly in the light of Israeli and American threats to attack and impose an illegal regime change.

It is illegal and unreasonable for the United States and Israel to require Iran to stop all support granted to the Resistance Axis in Lebanon, Yemen, Gaza, Syria, and Iraq. This support, as it exists, results from its agreements with the Resistance movements against the illegitimate Zionist entity. Opposition to Zionist colonialism, and all settler colonialism, should be commended.

Just Peace Advocates calls for deescalation, negotiations which respect international law, including the sovereign right of Iran to defend itself with all its advanced military assets and the right to work in tandem with all military and political opponents to the illegitimate Zionist occupation of Palestine.

A war on Iran would violate its sovereignty and the principals of Nuremberg established by the International Military Tribunal which established the legal precedent that launching a war of aggression is the “supreme international crime”. Defined as “crimes against peace,” this included planning, preparing, or initiating wars in violation of international treaties and sovereign nations.

The United States must abandon it role as an aggressor and negotiate with Iran respecting its sovereignty recognized by International Law.




Visit our website: www.justpeaceadvocates.ca


Mark Carney has endorsed the US/Israeli war on Iran. Please tell the Prime Minister to condemn this effort to overthrow Iran's government or even balkanize the country in service of US imperialism and genocidal Jewish supremacy.

Just Peace Advocates


Copy and paste this email to friends to spread the word:

Subject: Send a letter: Condemn Canadian support for US/Israeli war on Iran

Body:

Friend,

I wrote a letter for the Action Network letter campaign: Condemn Canadian support for US/Israeli war on Iran .

Mark Carney has endorsed the US/Israeli war on Iran. Tell the Prime Minister to condemn this effort to balkanize Iran in service of US imperialism and genocidal Jewish supremacy.

Can you join me and write a letter? Click here: https://actionnetwork.org/letters/condemn-canadian-support-for-usisraeli-war-on-iran?source=email&

Thanks!


Trump announces ‘major combat operations’ in Iran to ‘protect Americans’

“We are going to destroy their missiles and raze their missile industry to the ground. It will be totally, again, obliterated,” Trump said.

February 28, 2026 at 8:22 am
Middle East Monitor


As explosions rocked Tehran and Israel announced “preemptive” strikes against Iran, US President Donald Trump also confirmed launching “major combat operations” in the Islamic republic, Anadolu reports.

“Our objective is to defend the American people by eliminating imminent threats from the Iranian regime,” Trump said in a video posted on his Truth Social account.

The president vowed to destroy Iran’s missiles, raze its missile industry to the ground and annihilate the navy, reiterating that it cannot have a nuclear weapon.

“We are going to destroy their missiles and raze their missile industry to the ground. It will be totally, again, obliterated,” Trump said.

The attacks come as talks over Iran’s nuclear program have been ongoing under Oman’s mediation. A new round of talks in Geneva ended on Thursday.​​​​​​​

Last June, the US struck three Iranian nuclear sites towards the end of the 12-day Israel-Iran war.

Europe expected to join Israel-Iran war as missiles fired toward Jerusalem

Europe expected to join Israel-Iran war as missiles fired toward Jerusalem
An Iranian ballistic missile that fell in an open field in Israel. / CC: Israel Police
By bnm Tel Aviv bureau March 1, 2026

Alarms sounded across Jerusalem again as Iran launched another wave of missiles and drones toward Israel on March 1, with European powers expected to join the conflict on the side of the US and Israel. 

The IDF confirmed that approximately 100 ballistic missiles were fired at Israel from Iran early on March 1, with most intercepted by Israeli air defences.

Two Israelis have been reportedly killed since the start of the ongoing conflict, with at least 456 injured according to Israel's Army Radio earlier in the day.

Israeli operations in Tehran have resulted in the elimination of 40 Iranian commanders, in addition to the elimination of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Initial IDF assessments indicated that, in the fresh wave of Iranian strikes, two missiles and one drone heading toward Jerusalem were successfully intercepted.

"We expect the Europeans to join the coalition and the attacks against Iran," Israeli Minister of Energy Cohen stated in an interview with Israel's Channel 2.

"They may be afraid of extremist elements among them. They need to be on the right side of history. To free the Iranian people and stop the global terror apparatus. Trump is showing here that he is the leader of the free world."

This comes after several European powers condemned Iran’s latest actions. Albania, France, Germany, Poland, Lithuania, and Ukraine came out with public statements against the government of Iran, while the United Kingdom convened the Government's emergency "Cobra" or Cabinet Briefing Room committee.

An Iranian unnamed source with knowledge of the military operations told IRGC-linked Tasnim that intelligence assessments indicated more than 90% of Iranian missiles hit their targets inside Israel, catching the Israeli military off guard.

Several waves of dozens of missiles were fired at Israeli territory throughout the day.

Iran's Khatam al-Anbiya Central Command spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Ebrahim Zolfaghari said Iranian armed forces struck key security and military centres inside Israeli territory alongside 14 US military bases across the region, claiming hundreds of American and Israeli personnel were killed.

"The powerful and resolute operations of the armed forces will continue more forcefully and on a wider scale than before," Zolfaghari said in a statement carried by National Security Council-backed Nournews .

Iran said its opening wave combined army drone strikes against US radar sites with ballistic missiles including the Emad and Qadr, which Tehran described as upgraded versions of those used in previous operations. Iran also claimed to have fired its Fattah hypersonic missile.

A hotel in Dubai said to be housing Israeli military commanders was also struck, according to sources cited by Nournews.

Iran's Red Crescent reported that 24 provinces across Iran were hit in the US-Israeli strikes, with 201 people killed and 747 wounded as of 20:45 local time. East Azerbaijan province alone was struck at 17 points, leaving one dead and 35 wounded.



Opinion

Madmen Trump and Netanyahu set the Middle East on fire

In a reckless push for regime change, Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu set the Middle East on a dangerous path to a long and bloody war.


The New Arab Editorial
28 Feb, 2026


Trump, a self-styled peace president who had campaigned for years against further military entanglements in the Middle East, has proven himself every bit as warmongering as the worst of the neoconservatives.


In the early hours of Sunday, America’s madman-in-chief Donald Trump and his foreign policy handler Benjamin Netanyahu launched an unprovoked war on Iran, setting the entire Middle East ablaze in a strategic gamble that is both criminal and potentially self-defeating.

The opening salvo, aimed at decapitating the regime in Tehran, appears to have failed, with the top leaders of the Islamic Republic said to be alive and unharmed.

That situation could still change. While Trump donned a USA baseball cap in his declaration of war, Netanyahu vowed in a speech infused with biblical verses to pursue regime change in Iran, warning the war could cost American and Israeli lives. In other words, this points to a relentless, all-in war, one far closer in scale to the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 than to any limited or symbolic strike.

This escalation comes after weeks of diplomatic talks that, while slow, had been making incremental progress, raising the inevitable question of whether war was the intention all along.

It also comes barely a year after the 12-day war with Iran in 2025, which Trump repeatedly claimed as a decisive success. If that campaign achieved its stated objectives, the question now then is why return to war at all?

Iran has responded by striking targets across the region, including in Abu Dhabi and Bahrain, and reportedly in Iraq and Saudi Arabia.

The Iranian objective is clear: to raise the cost for the US and its allies of continuing this campaign, and to pressure regional actors to dissuade Trump from pursuing his regime-change project to the bitter end.

Trump, a self-styled peace president who had campaigned for years against further military entanglements in the Middle East, has proven himself every bit as warmongering as the worst of the neoconservatives. While he and Netanyahu speak of helping the Iranian people overthrow their “tyrannical” rulers, using the language of colonial hubris that has learned nothing from history, US and Israeli strikes have hit civilian sites, with dozens said to have been killed at an Iranian school on Saturday.

Netanyahu, for his part, has recycled the familiar rhetoric of the US, Israel and the so-called “free world” joining forces to defeat terror. Yet the domestic fronts in the United States and Israel are deeply divided over this war, and over the fate of the regime in Tehran. There is no clear popular mandate in any of these three countries for foreign-imposed regime change.

Alborz Ghandehari

This war also reinforces a growing suspicion, including within segments of Trump’s own MAGA base, that he is waging conflict on Israel’s behalf without a clearly defined American strategic interest. Far from strengthening Washington’s position, such a war risks draining US military resources, undermining its ability to confront peer competitors, and further destabilising its already fragile standing in the Middle East.

What exists instead is uncertainty and the real prospect of a protracted, deadly conflict that could drag on for years rather than the days or weeks imagined in the fantasies of Trump and Netanyahu.

It is also legitimate to ask whether this war serves domestic political purposes. With both men facing mounting crises and scandals at home, the temptation to escalate abroad cannot be dismissed. For leaders who routinely conflate national interest with personal survival, the distinction between the two is often blurred.

We are still in the opening hours of this onslaught and its repercussions. But one fact is already evident: two Western leaders have launched yet another war on a Muslim country on dubious grounds, once again setting the region alight. And the worst may still lie ahead.

The New Arab Editorial represents the collective voice of The New Arab’s editorial team, presenting views that promote authentic discourses on the MENA region and beyond.

US, Israel launch war on Iran as public support collapses

Ali Abunimah 
28 February 2026
ELECTRONIC INTAFADA


US President Donald Trump announced the joint Israeli-American attack on Iran, early Saturday, 28 February. @realDonaldTrump via CNP

As the US and Israel launched an all-out war on Iran, they did so amid shrinking American public support.

As recently as last week, a YouGov poll found that just a quarter of Americans wanted a war against Iran.

On Friday, a Gallup survey showed American sentiment shifting decisively towards the Palestinian people and away from Israel.

Forty-one percent of Americans now sympathize more with the Palestinians, while 36 percent sympathize more with the Israelis, according to a new Gallup survey.

The poll reverses the firm’s findings from a year ago and confirms long-term trends.

Last year, a Pew survey indicated that more than half of people in the United States held a negative view of Israel – an 11-point surge since 2022, according to that organization.



Loss of support across the board


Gallup notes that over the last 25 years, “Israelis consistently held double-digit leads in Americans’ Middle East sympathies, with the gap averaging 43 points between 2001 and 2018.”

But that lead began to erode from around 2019, and Israel’s dramatic loss of support has only accelerated during Israel’s US-backed genocide in Gaza.

Fifty-seven percent of Americans favor an independent Palestinian state, according to Gallup, close to the highest level of support ever recorded by the firm.

There remains a clear partisan gap: a whopping 65 percent of Democrats sympathize more with Palestinians, while just 17 percent favor the Israelis.

Support for Israel among Republicans remains strong: Those sympathizing more with Israelis peaked at 87 percent in 2018, but that number now stands at 70 percent – the lowest level since 2004.

The greatest shift has been among so-called independents, according to Gallup: “By 41 percent to 30 percent, independents say they sympathize more with the Palestinians than the Israelis, whereas in all prior years, they were more sympathetic toward the Israelis, including by 42 percent to 34 percent last year.”

In recent years, a clear generational shift has emerged, with younger Americans tending to support Palestinians. But as Gallup notes in its new survey, “Americans of all age groups have grown more sympathetic to the Palestinians in recent years.”

Yet younger Americans remain the strongest reservoir of support for Palestine. “Among those aged 18 to 34, 53 percent say they sympathize more with the Palestinians, marking the first time a majority of this age group has expressed this view,” according to Gallup.

Meanwhile, a record low of 23 percent of young adults now sympathize more with the Israelis.
Democrats chose genocide over White House

Eroding support for Israel should shape policy – if democracy works as taught in civics class.

But the Democratic Party under President Joe Biden preferred to sacrifice its chances of re-election in 2024 to maintain its support for Israel’s genocide despite an overwhelming majority of Democratic voters favoring an arms embargo.

An internal “autopsy” of the 2024 Democratic campaign has reportedly concluded that the party’s support for the Gaza genocide played a major role in its candidate Kamala Harris losing the election.

The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee is demanding that the party release the report, noting that the advocacy group had “repeatedly warned that a political reckoning would be inevitable if the US did not end its financial, military and diplomatic backing of Israel’s indiscriminate bombing of Gaza.”

Still, the most senior elected Democrat, New York Senator Chuck Schumer, recently made clear that his priority remains ensuring that American money and weapons keep flowing to the genocidal regime in Tel Aviv.


The Trump administration’s escalating support for Israel’s most extreme positions – including Ambassador Mike Huckabee’s endorsement of Israeli territorial expansion as far as Baghdad and Cairo, and American recognition of Israeli colonies in the occupied West Bank – is arguably more democratic: at least it is in tune with a majority of Republicans, if not with most Americans.


But even on the right, there have been unprecedented ruptures, with many commentators, most notably Tucker Carlson, expressing not just open hostility to Israel but tentatively embracing Palestinians.



The “Epstein regime” does what it wants



Eroding support for Israel may eventually affect policy, but public opposition has not restrained President Donald Trump from launching another American war.

Trita Parsi of the Quincy Institute argued that Israel’s dwindling support pushed Washington and Tel Aviv to speed up their attack.

“It is difficult to overstate the significance of this,” Parsi commented regarding the Gallup poll the day before the American-Israeli joint assault. “This is a key reason why Israel – and its supporters in the US – have a sense of desperate urgency when it comes to war with Iran and annexation of Palestine.”

“The window for these aggressions with US support is closing,” Parsi added.

Tehran University professor Mohammad Marandi – speaking from the Iranian capital under attack – called the unaccountable elite responsible for this war the “Epstein regime.”


Opinion

From Munich to Tehran: Echoes of appeasement and lessons of power drift


Security teams on duty as hundreds of citizens participate in the celebrations marking the 47th anniversary of the 1979 revolution led by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in Iran, gathering at Tehran’s Azadi Square on February 11, 2026. [Fatemeh Bahrami – Anadolu Agency]


by Jasim Al-Azzawi
February 28, 2026 
Middle East Monitor 


The uneasy negotiations between the United States and Iran are unfolding under the shadow of a long historical truth: great-power systems rarely collapse in a single dramatic moment. They erode. They drift. They unravel—through hesitation, miscalculation, and the quiet accumulation of small crises that go unanswered until answering them becomes catastrophic.

The European descent into war in the 1930s remains the starkest example of how incremental provocations, when met with divided or delayed responses, can push nations toward a confrontation none of them originally sought. As the historian A.J.P. Taylor observed, WWII was a war that no one willed, planned, or wanted. Yet it came anyway, because those with the power to stop it chose ambiguity over clarity at every critical juncture.

The comparison with today is not moral. Iran is not Nazi Germany, and the multipolar world of 2026 is not the shattered post-Versailles order. But the incremental escalation and the seductive trap of strategic ambiguity echo with unsettling clarity.

The 1930s: A study in calibrated provocation

When Hitler came to power in 1933, he did not plunge Europe into war. He probed it. Step by step, test by test, each gamble bolder than the last and advanced because he was permitted to advance.

In 1936, German troops marched into the demilitarized Rhineland—a zone the Treaty of Versailles had explicitly forbidden them to enter. Hitler’s own generals warned him that Germany was unprepared for war; he reportedly told them to reverse course if France intervened. France did not intervene. Britain expressed concern. The gamble paid off.

In 1938, the Anschluss of Austria was carried out without resistance. The Sudetenland crisis ended at Munich with Neville Chamberlain’s infamous “peace for our time.” By 1939, the dismantling of all Czechoslovakia revealed the truth that the historian Ian Kershaw would later crystallize: appeasement did not buy peace. It bought momentum.

By September 1939, when Hitler crossed into Poland, and the Allies finally drew a line, it was too late. The crisis had grown into something far more dangerous than it had been at the start—not because the Allies lacked intelligence or understanding, but because they lacked the will to act when the cost of action was still manageable.

The tragedy of the 1930s was not a failure of intelligence. It was a failure of clarity and resolve.


READ: Why Trump’s war on Iran will fail

The modern parallel: Incrementalism in the US–Iran standoff

The US–Iran confrontation today is shaped by a structurally similar logic. Iran does not seek open war. It probes. It tests. It advances in calibrated steps to shift the balance of power, while remaining below the threshold that would trigger a decisive American response.

Consider the pattern: increasing uranium enrichment to near-weapons-grade levels; installing advanced IR-6 and IR-8 centrifuges; restricting IAEA inspectors while stockpiling enriched material; expanding proxy networks across Iraq, Yemen, Syria, and Lebanon; probing American red lines through deniable attacks on US-linked assets. Each move is significant, and in theory, each move is reversible. Each move, as Chicago University Professor of Political Science Mearsheimer would frame it, is designed to maximize leverage while minimizing the risk of catastrophic retaliation.


“States that are not satisfied with the existing distribution of power are called revisionist states. They want to change the rules of the international order in their favor.” — John Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics.

Iran is a revisionist state operating within a system still dominated by American power. Its strategy is not suicidal boldness but patient, incremental pressure, similar to the pressure Hitler applied between 1933 and 1939. Not confrontation but erosion.

Meanwhile, Washington oscillates. Review the US sequence: Pressure, then diplomacy; withdrawal from the JCPOA, then attempted re-engagement; targeted strikes, then strategic restraint. Domestic divisions, shifting administrations, and the perpetual fear of a wider regional war have produced exactly what the 1930s produced: mixed signals that each side interprets differently. For the United States, it is a restraint. For Tehran, it reads as hesitation. What America calls prudence, Iran calls permission.

The result is a strategic ambiguity that serves neither side and emboldens the wrong calculations.

The risk of a modern “Poland moment”

The takeaway from 1939 isn’t the inevitability of war, but the fragility of systems. A structure can only withstand a finite number of shocks before a single miscalculation triggers a collapse that no one intended.

“Wars begin when governments believe the price of aggression is cheap.” 
— Robert Gilpin, War and Change in World Politics.

In the US–Iran context, analysts warn that such a moment could materialize through any one of three vectors: a nuclear threshold crossing that eliminates Washington’s strategic window; a miscalculated proxy attack that kills Americans in numbers that make restraint politically untenable; or an escalation in the Strait of Hormuz—the chokepoint through which roughly 20% of the world’s oil passes—that draws in regional actors faster than diplomacy can contain.

The ‘brinkmanship’ strategy with Iran: A calculated approach

None of these scenarios requires deliberate intent. Like the events of the late 1930s, they could emerge from accumulated misjudgements. If Tehran misreads American tolerance, Washington misreads Iranian resolve, or a third party triggers a spiral beyond Washington’s or Tehran’s control. As the political scientist Graham Allison warned in the context of great-power rivalry, the structural forces at play are often more powerful than the intentions of the actors within them.

“The Thucydides Trap is the severe structural stress caused when a rising power threatens to displace a ruling power.” — Graham Allison, Destined for War.

Clarity as strategy—not confrontation as destiny

The 1930s teach a single, insightful lesson: ambiguity is not a strategy. It is a drift. And drift is what transforms manageable crises into unmanageable ones, local provocations into continental wars, and miscalculations into catastrophes.

For today’s policymakers, the historical imperative is to choose clarity over confrontation: clear boundaries, clear consequences, and clear diplomatic objectives. Negotiations with Iran may succeed or fail on their own merits. But they cannot succeed when conducted through wishful thinking, when red lines mean nothing, when each concession is rationalized as buying time rather than acknowledged as surrendering ground.

“You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—after they’ve tried everything else.” — attributed to Winston Churchill.

The European powers of the 1930s believed each concession would buy peace. In reality, each concession bought momentum—momentum toward a war they could have prevented had they chosen clarity over comfort even once, before it was too late.

The cost of clarity, then as now, is always lower than the cost of waiting for the next step.

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.