Thursday, August 27, 2026

 

Scented cleaning products create invisible air pollution



Surface cleaners remove germs and grime, but their fragrances react with indoor ozone to form nanoparticles at levels rivaling that of city traffic





American Chemical Society

Scented cleaning products create invisible air pollution 

image: 

This “tiny house lab,” which sits outside Purdue’s Delon and Elizabeth Hampton Hall of Civil Engineering, allows researchers to study indoor air quality more comprehensively than has been possible in other settings.

view more 

Credit: Purdue University photo/Kelsey Lefever





CHICAGO, Aug. 27, 2026 — What does a clean room smell like? Many people say citrus, pine, or flowers because these fragrances are common in cleaning products. A research team led by Brandon Boor found that scent compounds in cleaning products — conventional and botanical essential oil-based — quickly react in the air, forming nanoparticles that can travel deep into the lungs if inhaled. To reduce exposure to this invisible pollution, the team suggests using unscented products, running exhaust fans, and avoiding ozone-generating devices while cleaning.

The researchers will present their results at the fall meeting of the American Chemical Society (ACS) during the “Healthy Indoor Spaces: Bridging the Microbiome and Chemistry” symposium in McCormick Place. ACS Fall 2026 is being held August 23-27.

“Importantly, cleaning removes viruses and bacteria from surfaces, but it can also generate invisible air pollution. There's no visible dust or smoke in the air, but these particles are forming.” — Brandon Boor

“We showed that indoor ozone reactions with fragrances from cleaning produce nanoparticles that carry a respiratory dose comparable to, or greater than, what you would experience from standing outside along a busy road,” says Boor, an Assistant Professor of Civil and Construction Engineering at Purdue University who studies indoor air quality. “The particles are different in terms of their composition, but the total dose can be higher. You're not seeing smoke, dust, or haze in the air. Instead, you think the air smells great so it must be clean.”

Boor and his colleague Nusrat Jung, a Purdue Assistant Professor of Civil and Construction Engineering, started studying the impact of cleaning products and chemical disinfectants on indoor environments during the COVID-19 pandemic. In that work, they observed that many of these products are heavily scented. “That's often to create a pleasant smellscape in the indoor space,” says Boor. “But clean air should not smell like highly concentrated citrus fruit. It should not really smell of anything.”

Atmospheric chemists previously established that terpenes emitted by plants, such as pinene from pine trees, react with ozone to create airborne nanoparticles. The nanoparticles aggregate and eventually grow large enough to seed clouds. But in forests, terpene levels are relatively low, so particle formation occurs slowly.

Using scented products indoors releases terpenes as the fragrance compounds evaporate from surfaces or spray droplets. Common terpenes in cleaning liquids include pinene, limonene (lemon), thymol (thyme), and linalool (lavender), and at concentrations much higher than are found naturally outdoors. As a result, airborne terpene levels during cleaning can reach tens to hundreds of times those found in a forest, says Boor.

To study what happens in the process of routine cleaning, the researchers tested scented conventional liquid products and botanical-containing disinfectant sprays and wipes in a model house on Purdue’s campus. The tiny house has a working kitchen, wood flooring, and a bathroom. They found that the same chemistry that forms nanoparticles outside occurs inside at faster and at higher concentrations, which has important implications for human health.

Activities such as mopping, spraying countertops, and wiping surfaces with scented products formed billions or trillions of particles, depending on the product used. Most of the particles, called nanoparticles or ultrafine particles, were 1–30 nanometers wide, a size range often missed by at-home air quality monitors. By tracking them, the researchers observed that routine cleaning can generate ultrafine particle pollution at levels above those found outdoors. This poses potential health risks because ultrafine particles are small enough to deposit throughout the airways and deep into the lungs. There, they can contribute to respiratory system irritation and inflammation, or they can potentially enter the bloodstream.

Most surprising to the researchers was how fast the particles formed and grew — it took a matter of minutes. “By the time you finish cleaning up an indoor space, you’ve already formed a lot of nanoparticles and inhaled them,” says Boor.

More recently, Boor and Ernest Blatchley, a Professor at Purdue, found that simultaneously disinfecting air with germicidal far-UV (UV-C) lamps and cleaning surfaces with scented products creates an environment ripe for nanoparticle formation. In fact, the lamps interact with oxygen in the air and generate ozone, raising ozone levels in the tiny home to around 20 to 40 parts per billion, comparable to, though somewhat lower than, levels outdoors at the time of the experiments. The combination of elevated ozone and high terpene concentrations drove even more intense particle formation in the tiny house, raising potential inhalation concerns.

Boor wants these findings to inform consumers’ choices, not alarm them, and provides several steps people can take to reduce their exposure while cleaning:

  • Choose low-fragrance or fragrance-free products.
  • Avoid applying several scented products in the same cleaning session.
  • Run exhaust fans or open windows to ventilate the space.
  • Do not simultaneously clean surfaces with scented products while using ozone-generating devices, such as far UV-C lamps.

“Importantly, cleaning removes viruses and bacteria from surfaces, but it can also generate invisible air pollution,” says Boor. “There's no visible dust or smoke in the air, but these particles are forming.”

Boor thanks all the graduate students who have worked with him in the tiny house experiments along with the support of undergraduate students.

The research was funded by a National Science Foundation Faculty Early Career Development Program (CAREER) grant and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.

###

The American Chemical Society (ACS) is one of the world's largest scientific organizations and a global leader in advancing scientific knowledge. Founded in 1876, ACS' mission is to advance scientific knowledge, empower a global community, and champion scientific integrity. Guided by its vision of a world built on science, ACS brings together people, ideas, and resources to drive discovery and innovation, support the professional growth of scientists and students, and advance scientific discussion. Through its trusted publications, scientific meetings, community networks, education and career resources, and scientific information solutions, ACS helps scientists, educators, and students make a lasting impact on their communities and the world at large. Together, these efforts support ACS' commitment to improve all lives through the transforming power of chemistry.

Registered journalists can subscribe to the ACS journalist news portal on EurekAlert! to access embargoed and public science press releases. For media inquiries, contact newsroom@acs.org.

Note to journalists: Please report that this research was presented at a meeting of the American Chemical Society. ACS does not conduct research.

Title
Indoor atmospheric nanoparticle formation from scented cleaning products

Abstract
Scented volatile chemical products, including surface cleaning agents and botanical disinfectants, are widely used indoors and represent a major source of reactive organic emissions. These products are routinely applied in homes and workplaces for surface cleaning and disinfection to reduce the presence of viruses and bacteria. However, their role in driving indoor atmospheric chemistry and nanoparticle formation remains poorly constrained. This presentation investigates the impact of scented cleaning product use on airborne nanoparticle nucleation, growth, and human exposure to secondary pollutants in indoor environments. Field and laboratory experiments were conducted in controlled residential and office settings using real-time, high-resolution measurements of volatile organic compounds and nanoparticle size distributions extending to the nanocluster aerosol (1–3 nm) regime. Surface cleaning and disinfection activities produced rapid increases in terpene and terpenoid mixing ratios (10–1,000 ppb), often exceeding levels observed in outdoor forested environments. These compounds reacted with indoor oxidants, particularly ozone, to initiate intense nanoparticle nucleation and growth events. Observed nucleation rates (~105 cm-3 s-1) and condensational growth rates (up to 300 nm h-1) exceeded typical outdoor values by orders of magnitude, resulting in transient indoor nanoparticle number concentrations of 105–108 cm-3. Rapid nanoparticle growth enabled survival to sizes that efficiently deposit throughout the human respiratory system, yielding inhalation dose rates comparable to or exceeding those from primary combustion sources such as traffic emissions. Both conventional and botanical cleaning products generated complex multiphase exposure scenarios involving reactive gases and secondary organic aerosol. These findings identify indoor surface cleaning and disinfection as key drivers of indoor atmospheric nanoparticle formation and highlight the need for improved building ventilation, air cleaning, and product formulation to mitigate exposure to secondary pollutants.

 

Turning scientific evidence into action for airborne disease control



Animation most effective in motivating preventive health behaviors, according to a new study published in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, a Nature Portfolio journal




National Sun Yat-sen University

Turning Scientific Evidence into Action for Airborne Disease Control and Prevention 

image: 

An international study involving 3,217 participants, including healthcare professionals, educators, and university students across Taiwan, Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines found that animation was the most effective science communication format for improving understanding, strengthening empathy, and motivating disease-prevention behavior change. The study, led by the Aerosol Science Research Center at National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan, was published in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, a Nature Portfolio journal.

view more 

Credit: Aerosol Science Rersearch Center, National Sun Yat-sen University





NSYSU, TAIWAN — Even as the scientific community has reached broad consensus that infectious pathogens, such as viruses, can spread through airborne transmission in virus-laden aerosols, one fundamental challenge remains:

How can scientific evidence be transformed into public understanding—and ultimately into meaningful action for effective airborne disease control and prevention?

A new international study led by researchers at Aerosol Science Research Center, National Sun Yat-sen University (NSYSU), Taiwan, offers an evidence-based answer. Published in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, a Nature Portfolio journal, the study demonstrates that animation is significantly more effective than text alone in motivating people to adopt preventive health behaviors.

The findings suggest that effective science communication is not simply about delivering accurate information. Rather, it is about helping people understand complex science, emotionally connect with its relevance, and translate that understanding into action.

 

From Knowledge to Action

The interdisciplinary research team evaluated three science communication formats—plain text, explainer comics, and animation — using "The Quest of the Virosols", an original educational series developed by the team of Aerosol Science Research Center, NSYSU following publication of the team's Science review article on airborne transmission of respiratory viruses (Wang et al, Science 373, eabd9149 (2021)).

The cross-national study involved 3,217 participants from Taiwan, Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines, including healthcare professionals, educators, and university students. Researchers examined how different communication formats influenced scientific understanding and willingness to adopt preventive measures against airborne infectious diseases.

While all three formats improved participants' knowledge, animation consistently produced the strongest behavioral impact. Compared with plain text, animation and explainer comics made complex concepts surrounding airborne virus transmission substantially easier to understand. Animation, however, went one step further—significantly increasing participants' willingness to implement preventive measures.

 

Why Animation Works Better Than Comics and Plain Text

Professor Paichi Pat Shein, one of the study's corresponding authors, noted that animation's effectiveness lies not only in its visual appeal but also in its ability to create emotional engagement.

By combining narrative, imagery, and character-driven storytelling, animation allows viewers to better understand how airborne diseases affect themselves, their families, and society. This emotional connection strengthens risk perception, increases empathy, and ultimately encourages behavioral change.

The study also found that animation had an especially strong impact among female participants, possibly reflecting stronger concern for environmental issues, public health, and the well-being of others. These findings suggest that empathy may play an important role in translating scientific understanding into preventive action.

 

Science Communication as a Public Health Strategy

"The COVID-19 pandemic taught us that scientific evidence alone is not enough to change the world," said Professor Chia C. Wang, Director of the Aerosol Science Research Center, and Professor of Department of Chemistry at National Sun Yat-sen University and one of the study's corresponding authors.

"Science communication is not merely about transferring knowledge. It is about transforming knowledge into understanding, understanding into empathy, and empathy into action."

Professor Wang noted that the implications of the research extend well beyond aerosol science.

"Effective science communication should be recognized as an essential component of public health preparedness. Our findings demonstrate that helping people understand science is just as important as generating scientific evidence."

 

Beyond COVID-19

Originally developed during the COVID-19 pandemic, "The Quest of the Virosols" was designed to explain the science of airborne virus transmission through engaging comics and animation. The educational materials have since been translated into 20 languages, reaching audiences around the world.

The new study closes an important loop: educational resources created during the pandemic have now become the foundation of an international evidence-based evaluation demonstrating how science communication can influence human behavior.

The researchers argue that these findings have implications extending beyond infectious disease prevention. Effective science communication can strengthen public engagement with complex societal challenges, including climate change, environmental health, sustainability, and future global emergencies.

 

Supporting Global Sustainable Development from Inside Out

The study further highlights that effective science communication helps cultivate essential human capacities—including openness to learning, systems thinking, critical thinking, empathy, connectedness, communication, courage, and responsible resource use—closely aligning with the Inner Development Goals (IDGs).

By strengthening these capacities, science communication may accelerate progress toward multiple UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) while fostering more resilient and informed societies.

"In our increasingly interconnected world," the researchers conclude, "we breathe the same air and share a common destiny. The challenge ahead is no longer simply generating more scientific knowledge— it is ensuring that knowledge becomes understanding, empathy, and collective action." The findings demonstrate that effective science communication should be recognized as an essential component of public health preparedness and evidence-informed policymaking. More broadly, the study demonstrates that effective science communication can serve as a bridge between scientific discovery and societal transformation.

This work contributes not only to better future pandemic preparedness, but also to broader efforts in public health communication, disease prevention, sustainability, and global resilience.

 

Link to the origainl explainer comics and animation of "The Quest of Virosols" developed by ASRC, NSYSU: https://aerosol.nsysu.edu.tw/en/scopes/108

MACHO MISOGYNY

Spanish Nutrition Agency issues menopause guidelines based on male studies

File photo. A woman holds an umbrella to shield herself from the sun on a hot, sunny day in Madrid, Spain.
Copyright AP Photo/Manu Fernandez


By Marina Neila
Published on


The agency will review the report after criticism from several women researchers, who argue that some advice on nutrients like iron or vitamin C relies only on studies on men.

A menopause guide with an unexpected protagonist: men. The Spanish Agency for Food Safety and Nutrition (AESAN) will review its report on diet and healthy habits during the menopause after several scientists questioned the fact that some of its recommendations on nutrients and women's nutritional needs at this stage are based on studies carried out exclusively on men.

The agency has asked its scientific committee to carry out the review. The controversy stems from the fact that the document, published last March, uses values from research by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) without explicitly warning that the reference studies were conducted on male populations.

AESAN has acknowledged there was an "omission of a warning" and has argued for the need to expand research specifically focused on women during the menopause.

The report sets out a series of recommendations designed to reduce the risks associated with this stage, such as loss of bone and muscle mass or cardiovascular problems. These include a diet rich in protein, omega-3, fibre, calcium, iron and vitamins, as well as regular exercise, with particular emphasis on strength training.

Te

The Spanish Minister for Equality, Ana Redondo, has called for the document to be reviewed in a post on X and has urged that situations like this "do not happen again". "It is about time women were present in health agendas and studies, and the male body stopped being the universal reference point for everything, even for issues related to the menopause," the minister said.

The controversy also highlights a longstanding problem in medical research: for decades, men have been over-represented in clinical trials and other scientific studies, while women have been excluded or under-represented.

This gap has meant that part of our knowledge about diseases, symptoms, treatments or doses has been built around the male body as the standard, even though there are biological differences that can influence both the onset of certain conditions and the response to medicines and treatments. The result can be less accurate diagnosis, prevention and healthcare for women.

 

Hunter-gatherers sleep no longer than we do: review suggests industrialization changed sleep timing more than duration



A peer-reviewed narrative review in Brain Medicine, led by Dr. Seithikurippu R. Pandi-Perumal, integrates anthropology, history, and phylogenomics to argue that timing and regularity, more than duration, separate modern sleep from ancestral patterns



Genomic Press

Sleep is the central core of human health and wellness 

image: 

Sleep is the central core of human health and wellness, which is surrounded by two concentric circles that illustrate the multi-scale sleep regulatory factors.

view more 

Credit: Randy Nelson






MORGANTOWN, West Virginia, UNITED STATES, 25 August 2026 - Everyone knows the number. Eight hours. It sits on wellness dashboards, on pediatric handouts, on the label of the melatonin bottle in the medicine cabinet. A peer-reviewed narrative review published today in Brain Medicine gathers anthropological fieldwork, archival history, and comparative genomics into one continuous line of sight, and the number does not emerge intact. People living without electric light in three separate hunter-gatherer societies on two continents sleep between 6.4 and 7.1 hours a night. That is not more than the industrialized average. In several comparisons it is less.

The distinction matters, because a review is not an experiment. No participants were recruited. No genomes were sequenced. The eight authors, working across India, Canada, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the United Kingdom, and the United States, did something that individual studies cannot do for themselves: they placed a literature that has been quarreling with itself for two decades side by side and asked what it collectively says.

The Number That Nobody Measured

In the middle of the nineteenth century, the review notes, a tidy arithmetic of the day took hold: eight hours of work, eight hours of rest, eight hours of sleep. It dominated society. It was also, according to the synthesis, never studied systematically. The behavior of actual sleepers went unrecorded while the prescription hardened into common sense. One early attempt at measurement, a 1913 survey conducted at Stanford University that is sometimes cited as evidence that people once slept nine hours, turns out on inspection to have surveyed children aged eight to seventeen rather than adults.

So how did a convention become a clinical benchmark? And what happens to a benchmark when the populations least touched by industrial life turn out not to meet it either?

"The literature keeps asking whether we sleep less than our ancestors did, and we think that is the wrong question," said Dr. Seithikurippu R. Pandi-Perumal, first author of the review, of the Central Research Facility at Dr D.Y. Patil Medical College hospital and Research Centre in Pune and the Centre for Research and Development at Chandigarh University in Mohali, India. "Put the field data next to the archival record and next to the genomics, and what separates industrial sleep from pre-industrial sleep is when it happens and how reliably it repeats. Not how many hours it fills."

What Changed, and What Did Not

The three populations at the center of the comparison are the Hadza of Tanzania, the San of Namibia, and the Tsimane of Bolivia. Their sleep tracks the local cycle of light and dark closely. It also stays consolidated. The review reports no consistent evidence of segmented or biphasic patterns in these groups, which is awkward for a story that has become the folk history of ancestral sleep.

What industrialization did change, the synthesis argues, comes down to four things: sleep moved later, day-to-day regularity fell away, entrainment to natural light weakened, and diagnosable sleep disorders became more common. Total hours, the single metric that dominates public conversation and clinical intake forms alike, moved least of all.

A Famous Historical Claim, Reopened

Here the review turns to the archive. In "At Day’s Close: Night in Times Past," the historian Roger Ekirch drew on court documents, letters, and literary sources to argue that pre-industrial Europeans slept in two blocks separated by an hour or two of wakefulness, an interval spent in prayer, contemplation, sex, or household work. The claim traveled a long way beyond the academy.

The review authors do not dismiss it. They complicate it. A recent reconsideration of the same primary sources contends that the phrase "first sleep" carried several meanings in early modern writing and did not necessarily denote a fixed two-part architecture; it could mean the first uninterrupted stretch, the deepest stretch, or sleep taken during the first half of a night shift. A doctoral study of Roman domestic arrangements found little literary or archaeological support for standardized segmented sleep in that culture. And the most frequently cited experimental support, a photoperiod study in which volunteers spent fourteen hours in enforced darkness in windowless rooms with activity prohibited, describes conditions that the review characterizes as very unlike a pre-industrial evening lit by a candle and a fire.

The conclusion cuts in both directions. Pre-industrial sleep was not uniformly segmented. Contemporary consolidated sleep is not a single modern imposition upon a single ancestral norm. Each pattern, the authors write, reflects the local ecology of light, climate, work, and social life under which it occurs.

The Gene That Argues With the Guideline

If history unsettles the eight-hour rule from one side, genetics unsettles it from the other. The review traces DEC2, also known as BHLHE41, a transcriptional repressor identified in a household whose members slept approximately six hours nightly without showing symptoms of sleep deprivation. The proline-to-arginine substitution at position 384 was subsequently introduced into mice, which slept less across both REM and non-REM cycles and showed no behavioral, motor, or cognitive impairment.

The clinical inference the authors draw is unusually concrete for a review. Familial short sleep driven by a validated variant should be recognized as a non-pathological phenotype, so that healthy short sleepers are not subjected to unnecessary investigation or behavioral correction.

"Clinically, the most immediate consequence is that we should stop treating every short sleeper as a patient," said Dr. Ahmed S. BaHammam, co-author, of the University Sleep Disorders Center in the Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. "Where a validated variant such as DEC2 P384R is driving short sleep in a family, investigation and correction do more harm than good."

One Molecule, From Cave Fish to the Pharmacy Shelf

The most striking thread in the synthesis is hypocretin, also called orexin. Neurons producing it in the lateral hypothalamus project to the monoaminergic and cholinergic nuclei that sustain wakefulness. Lose them and you get human narcolepsy with cataplexy, a syndrome recapitulated in dogs carrying loss-of-function mutations in the hypocretin receptor 2 gene and in orexin knockout mice. The DEC2 variant upregulates orexin expression in transgenic mice. Cave populations of the Mexican tetra, Astyanax mexicanus, which lost sleep independently in separate caves, show enhanced hypocretin signaling relative to their surface-dwelling relatives, and that signal accounts for much of the convergence. The pharmacology already sits in the clinic in the form of dual orexin receptor antagonists prescribed for insomnia.

"Hypocretin turns out to be the thread," said Dr. Randy J. Nelson, corresponding author, of the Department of Neuroscience at West Virginia University in Morgantown. "It runs through narcolepsy in people and in dogs, through short sleep in mice carrying a human variant, and through fish that gave up sleeping in caves on separate occasions. A gate that conserved is telling you something about how wakefulness is built."

How Deep Do the Roots Run

Deeper than most readers will expect, and the review is careful about exactly how deep. More than one hundred genes with sequence homology to known metazoan sleep-regulating genes have been identified in the single-celled green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Work on extremophilic bacteria and on the reconstructed genome of the Last Universal Common Ancestor points in the same direction. Yet the authors state plainly that they do not imply these organisms sleep. What phylogenomics reveals is conserved molecular machinery, not sleep behavior. The distinction is the sort of restraint that reviews exist to enforce.

Ecology Writes the Schedule

Across animals, sleep architecture varies with predation risk and metabolic rate rather than with any universal optimum. Prey species sleep lightly and in short frequent bouts, because sensory disconnection is expensive when something is hunting you. Lions, facing few threats and holding secure sleeping sites, sit at the opposite end. Cetaceans, pinnipeds, and several birds split the difference with unihemispheric slow-wave sleep, one hemisphere resting while the other keeps watch. There is a cautionary detail buried in the comparative data as well: field actigraphy in wild three-toed sloths records roughly nine to ten hours of sleep per day, against the fifteen to twenty hours long reported from captive animals. Where the measurement is taken changes the answer.

The Urban Ledger

The review then follows sleep out of the laboratory and into the street, where the evidence turns from evolutionary to political. Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage predicts reduced sleep efficiency and greater nighttime wakefulness even after individual factors are controlled, and it predicts shorter sleep in children. A housing upgrading program in Buenos Aires that moved residents from makeshift dwellings into prefabricated modular units produced measurable gains in subjective sleep quality. National spatial analyses in the United States document that nighttime light and traffic noise run substantially higher in low-income and racially segregated neighborhoods than in more affluent areas of the same cities. Approximately twenty percent of workers in industrialized countries do night shift work.

Climate change enters as an amplifier. Projections cited in the review indicate that, under a high-emissions scenario and assuming no further behavioral or technological adaptation, warming could add six to fourteen nights of insufficient sleep per one hundred individuals annually between 2050 and 2099 in the United States, falling hardest on lower-income people and on warmer regions.

"Sleep is not distributed the way people assume," said Dr. Haitham Jahrami, co-author, of the Psychiatry Hospital, Government Hospitals, Manama, and the Department of Psychiatry at the College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Bahrain. "Noise, light, heat, and housing quality fall hardest on the people least able to shield themselves, and every one of those exposures is tractable. Building codes and lighting standards are sleep interventions, even though nobody files them under that heading."

What the Review Cannot Say

The authors are explicit that this is a narrative review rather than a systematic synthesis, that topic selection followed their judgment about which sources bridge macro-level and micro-level accounts, and that many methodologically sound studies fell outside those bridging themes and were excluded. Readers wanting systematic coverage of sleep duration, sleep disorders, or circadian biology are pointed elsewhere. A cross-sectional finding of elevated oxidative stress biomarkers among segmented sleepers in Oman cannot establish causation and rests on a sample of mainly young adults. Large wearable-device studies capture only people who own consumer wearables, which leaves informal urban settlements in low- and middle-income countries largely invisible.

And one question sits open at the center of everything. If seven to eight hours of sleep confers health benefits, does it still confer them when the seven to eight hours arrive in two pieces? The literature on duration does not ask. The literature on regularity does not ask either. Nobody, as far as this synthesis can determine, has tested whether split sleep with reliable timing performs as well as consolidated sleep. For a species that may have slept in more than one shape for most of its history, that is a conspicuous silence.

The immediate practical consequence is smaller and more useful than a headline number. Sleep assessment, the authors argue, should move beyond duration alone and routinely incorporate timing, regularity, and indices of circadian alignment, because those are the dimensions modern living actually disturbs. The eight-hour night may or may not be right for any given person. The review suggests we have simply been measuring the wrong thing.

The peer-reviewed review article in Brain Medicine titled “The new science of sleep: Insights from pre-industrial societies and phylogenomics,” is freely available via Open Access, starting on 25 August 2026 in Brain Medicine at the following hyperlink: https://doi.org/10.61373/bm026w.0060

The full reference for citation purposes is: Pandi-Perumal SR, Saravanan KM, Spence DW, Alsaif SS, Jahrami H, BaHammam AS, et al. The new science of sleep: Insights from pre-industrial societies and phylogenomics. Brain Medicine 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61373/bm026w.0060. Epub 2026 Aug 25.

About Brain Medicine: Brain Medicine (ISSN: 2997-2639, online and 2997-2647, print) is a peer-reviewed medical research journal published by Genomic Press, New York. Brain Medicine is a new home for the cross-disciplinary pathway from innovation in fundamental neuroscience to translational initiatives in brain medicine. The journal’s scope includes the underlying science, causes, outcomes, treatments, and societal impact of brain disorders, across all clinical disciplines and their interface.

Visit the Genomic Press Virtual Library: https://issues.genomicpress.com/bookcase/gtvov/

Our media website is at: https://media.genomicpress.com/

Our full website is at: https://genomicpress.com/