Tuesday, December 27, 2022

UK
Former Conservative deputy prime minister calls for higher wages for care workers

Story by Kate Devlin • Yesterday 

Former Conservative deputy prime minister Damian Green has called for care workers to be paid more, intensifying pressure on Rishi Sunak as the government tries to hold firm on public sector wages.

Nurses strike: Union leader urges government to 'do the decent thing'
  Duration 1:51   View on Watch

The prime minister is already facing demands from a number of Tory MPs to increase nurses’ salaries and bring an increasingly bitter strike to a halt.

But Mr Sunak has pledged he will hold out, for months if need be, for fear of increasing inflation.


IF HE APPLIED A WINDFALL TAX  INFLATION WOULD BE UNDER CONTROL


Former deputy PM Damian Green warns that care workers could be lost to other sectors (PA)© Provided by The Independent

Britons famously clapped for care workers as well as nurses on doorsteps up and down the country during the pandemic.

But supporters of those who work in the sector say they have become the forgotten face of care during Covid.

Now Mr Green, who was de facto deputy prime minister under Theresa May, has cautioned that care workers have to be paid more or the UK will lose them to other sectors. He warned of an acute problem with recruitment and retention at a time when the country needs more care workers to deal with an increasingly elderly population.

The workforce needs to grow by 100,000, said Mr Green, and “to achieve that, it needs to be better paid and have a higher status”. He added: “We need more care workers, whether they come from abroad or whether they are homegrown. And when we get them, we need to keep them.”

He also warned that parts of the public sector are cannibalising each other, with care workers being lost to the NHS.

“The way to [keep care workers] is to have salary parity with the NHS, otherwise you will end up losing care workers to the NHS,” he said. “If you’re doing the same job in the social care sector as in the NHS, then straightforwardly many will decide to move to the NHS.”


Mr Green says the country needs more care workers, whether ‘homegrown’ or from overseas (PA Archive)© Provided by The Independent

A new report titled Unfair To Care, by Community Integrated Care, one of Britain’s biggest social care charities, estimates that many care workers would be paid up to 42 per cent more per year for equivalent positions within the NHS.

There are thought to be more than a million care workers in the UK, but last year there were 165,000 vacant posts. Simon Bottery, from think tank The King’s Fund, said there is a “genuine recruitment crisis” in adult social care.

“While better pay is not the only factor, it is essential to attract and retain staff,” he said. His research found that, while a decade ago shopworkers and cleaners were paid less than care workers, by 2018-19 they were being paid more.

PIG HEADED UPPER CLASS TWIT


Prime minister Rishi Sunak says the government has acted fairly on public sector pay
 (PA Wire)© Provided by The Independent

Megan Fisher, from one of the UK’s largest unions, the GMB, called for care workers to be paid £15 an hour, which she said is “the least they deserve”, adding: “The government should act to make this happen.”

Liz Kendall, Labour’s shadow minister for care, said that without staff “millions will continue to go without care” and that the problem would also have a knock-on effect on the NHS, where hospital beds are filled by patients who cannot leave because there are no carers available to support them at home.

Mr Green also said that providing suitable housing and improving technology could create years of “healthy life”. If everyone had just one extra year, the NHS and care system would save £60bn, he said. In addition, he suggested that more American-style retirement homes or sheltered housing could help to ease the housing crisis.

“A lot of these retired people will want to live a top-of-the-range lifestyle but move into somewhere smaller. As a country, we build far too few of these houses for older people, where there are doctors and nurses on site or regularly visiting. This would free up the whole housing ladder, allowing younger people to get a foot on the ladder.”

Mr Green also warned that the system is not making enough use of technology, such as smart fridges and electronic medicine dispensers, which could help older people to stay in their own homes for months or even years longer.

“There seems to be no concerted effort to enable people to live in their own homes for longer,” he said. “There’s not enough of a national push to see what technology is out there, to see what could be used.”

As they try to attract more care workers, ministers are investing £15m to increase international recruitment and have launched a domestic advertising campaign under the slogan “Made with Care”.

A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said ministers are “incredibly grateful” to the social care workforce, and that they recognise their extraordinary commitment.

They said ministers had made up to £7.5bn available over the next two years to support social care services and discharge, which will help local authorities to address waiting lists, low fee rates, and workforce pressures within the sector.

From news to politics, travel to sport, culture to climate – The Independent has a host of free newsletters to suit your interests. To find the stories you want to read, and more, in your inbox, click here.
Russian Anxiety Has Doubled As Putin's War Causes Stress, Study Suggests

BY JAMES BICKERTON ON 12/26/22 

Over the past year the amount of anxiety expressed on Russian media and social media has more than doubled, primarily because of the war in Ukraine, according to a new investigation.

The study was conducted by the Public Relations Development Company (PRDC), a Russian communications firm founded in 1995.

It concluded that the number of anxious comments posted on media and social media in Russia had increased by 119 percent compared with 2021, and 273 percent compared with 2020.

Russian troops launched an all-out invasion of Ukraine on February 24 but were beaten back from Kyiv. They have since retreated from Kharkiv and pulled out of Kherson in a series of humiliating defeats.

Troops from Ukraine's 59th brigade fire on Russian forces on the front line near Donetsk, Ukraine on December 23, 2022. The ongoing war has contributed to a doubling of anxiety expressed on Russian social media, according to a new report.
PIERRE CROM/GETTY

On September 21 Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered a partial mobilization to conscript another 300,000 men into the military.

The PRDC research found the war, euphemistically called a "special military operation" by the Russian state, is now the top social media concern in 70 out of Russia's 85 regions, and is in the top three in 83 of them.

The second-biggest concern was inflation, which has surged across Russia since the invasion was launched.

According to Ukrainian newspaper Ukrainska Pravda, the report states: "The main source of anxiety among Russians in the outgoing year was the special [military] operation, as well as related topics: escalation of the conflict with the West and possibility of use of nuclear weapons, sabotage and possible transfer of hostilities to the territory of the 'old' oblasts of Russia, and partial mobilization."

The Russian foreign ministry has been contacted for comment

On Monday a suspected drone hit Russia's Engels-2 air base, more than 350 miles from Ukrainian-controlled territory, killing three servicemen according to the Russian defense ministry.

The ministry said the drone was successfully brought down by air defense, but that fragments of it killed three men on the ground. However, a number of experts on social media have questioned whether it really was intercepted, after video purporting to show the incident emerged.

On Sunday Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Russia will try to make the remainder of 2022 "dark and difficult," in a video message to his nation.

He commented: "Russia has lost everything possible this year. But [Putin] is trying to compensate for his losses with the cunning of his propagandists following missile strikes on our country, on our energy sector.

"There are a few days left in this year. We must be aware that our enemy will try to make this time dark and difficult for us.

"I know that the darkness will not prevent us from leading the occupiers to their new defeats, but we must be prepared for any scenario," he continued.

The Russian military has recently been pounding Ukraine's energy infrastructure, causing millions to go without power amid freezing temperatures.
BEFORE BOURSE THERE WAS INSURANCE
Japan insurers in talks with reinsurers to resume coverage in Russian waters

December 27, 2022

CNA – Three Japanese insurance companies that are set to halt marine coverage of risks related to the war in Ukraine starting next month are in talks with reinsurers to resume those operations, they said yesterday.

Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance, Sompo Japan Insurance and Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance on Friday told shipowners that they would stop offering marine war insurance, which covers damage to ships from war in Russian waters, from January 1, spokespeople at the companies said. Their comments confirmed local media reports on Saturday.


The change could affect Japan’s imports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) among other energy and commodities.

The insurers’ decision was prompted by global reinsurance companies saying they would no longer take on vessels’ risks related to the war, which began in February.

“We are negotiating with various reinsurers to get the war coverage in order to restart providing marine war insurance in the area to our customers,” a spokespeople at Tokio Marine said, adding that some reinsurers have responded “positively”.

Sompo Japan and Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance are also searching for new reinsurers, their spokespeople said.

Most vessels get two types of insurance: marine insurance covering damage from natural disasters and collisions, and marine war insurance covering damage from war or terrorism.

Without marine war insurance, shipowners may give up operations in Russian waters, including picking up LNG from the Sakhalin-2 gas and oil project in Russia’s Far East.

Japanese shipping company Mitsui OSK Lines said it is gathering information.

Nippon Yusen will cooperate with the government and business partners, a spokesperson said when asked about its shipping plan from Sakhalin-2.

The Sakhalin Island complex, partly owned by Gazprom and Japanese trading houses, accounts for nine per cent of Japan’s LNG imports.
Samsung Electronics to expand chip production at largest plant next year

December 27, 2022

ANN/THE INQUIRER – Samsung Electronics plans to increase chip production capacity at its largest semiconductor plant next year, despite forecasts of an economic slowdown, a South Korean newspaper reported late on Sunday.

The move contrasts with the scaling back of investment by rival chipmakers amid falling demand and a glut of chips.

Analysts have said that Samsung’s persistence with investment plans will likely help it take market share in memory chips and support its share price when demand recovers.

Samsung plans to expand its P3 factory in Pyeongtaek, South Korea, by adding 12-inch wafers capacity for DRAM memory chips, the Seoul Economic Daily reported, citing unnamed industry sources.


It will also expand the plant with additional four-nanometre chip capacity, which will be made under foundry contracts – that is, according to clients’ designs – the paper said.


P3, which started production of cutting-edge NAND flash memory chips this year, is the company’s largest chip manufacturing facility.

Samsung is planning to add at least 10 extreme ultraviolet machines next year, the newspaper said.

Samsung declined to comment on the report.

In October it said it was not considering intentionally cutting chip production, defying the broader industry’s tendency to scale back output to meet mid- to long-term demand.

“We plan to stand behind our original infrastructure investment plans,” executive vice president of memory business at Samsung Han Jin-man said then.

In contrast, memory chip rival Micron Technology Inc said last week it would adjust down its investments in fiscal 2023 to between USD7 billion and USD7.5 billion, compared with USD12 billion in fiscal 2022.

It would also be “significantly reducing capex” plans in fiscal 2024, it said.

Chipmaker TSMC in October cut its 2022 annual investment budget by at least 10 per cent and struck a more cautious note than usual on upcoming demand.

“The chip industry downturn will add to the difficulties of the number two and below chip companies, and have a positive impact on the market control of top companies such as Samsung,” head of research at Hyundai Motor Securities Greg Roh said in a client note yesterday.


Feature: Challenging gender stereotyping, first female boxing club opens in Gaza

Source: Xinhua
Editor: huaxia
2022-12-25 


A Palestinian woman practices boxing at a women's boxing club in Gaza City, Dec. 23, 2022. (Photo by Rizek Abdeljawad/Xinhua)


GAZA, Dec. 24 (Xinhua) -- Challenging conventions and gender stereotyping, the first-ever female boxing club recently opened in Gaza.

The club, which goes by the name Palestinian Center of Boxing for Women, currently has dozens of women aged between eight and 29 who receive 1.5 hours of training every day.

"We opened the club recently, but the idea of practising the sport started a few years ago," Osama Ayoub, the co-founder of the club and a boxing coach, told Xinhua as he supervised his students' training in the boxing ring.

"I came up with the idea to create a female boxing team six years ago when I participated in a boxing competition in Algeria, where I saw the fantastic performance given by Arab women of various ages," he recalled.



Palestinian women practice boxing at a women's boxing club in Gaza City, Dec. 23, 2022. (Photo by Rizek Abdeljawad/Xinhua)


Yet when Ayoub told his friends and colleagues about the idea, none of them thought it feasible as they live in a community where people hold very conservative ideas about women.

The 39-year-old coach did not give up and started to train a group of girls in 2017. Back then, his classes had five girls only.

However, many people later changed their ideas about female boxing after they noticed the positive changes in the trainers' psychological state, Ayoub noted.

"Our community traditions force women to stay away from many kinds of sports under the pretext that they are limited to men only," the coach lamented.

"Now I've planted the first seed of boxing sport for women in Gaza," he said, wearing a smile.



Palestinian women practice boxing at a women's boxing club in Gaza City, Dec. 23, 2022. (Photo by Rizek Abdeljawad/Xinhua)


Hala Ayoub, a Gazan boxer, is one of the coach's female students who joined the sport five years ago and has become a member of the Palestinian National Team.

"I am so happy because I can represent my country (Palestine) in any upcoming Arab or international competitions of boxing," the 17-year-old told Xinhua.

For her, the sport helped turn her from a weak girl afraid of everything into a strong one with more self-confidence.

"This sport is not, as many people think, a fierce and violent game. It helps us defend ourselves and enhance self-confidence, and is also a way to get rid of the negative energy many people suffer from," she said.

Jodi al-Nimer, another Gazan girl, joined boxing three months ago in hopes to help herself get rid of her inner fears of strangers, even her classmates.

"I came here to know how can I fight those who would harm me somewhere, (because) all the time, I feel that I am under threats, mainly from strangers," the 10-year-old told Xinhua.

She said many of her friends described boxing as "a shameful sport for girls," adding she would prove to them such stereotypes are wrong.



A Palestinian girl practices boxing at a women's boxing club in Gaza City, Dec. 23, 2022. (Photo by Rizek Abdeljawad/Xinhua)


Still, the locals in the Palestinian coastal enclave are divided over whether the sport is fit for women.

"We are heading to the year 2023, so it is normal for girls and women to practise any kind of sports," Mohammed al-Jaro, a Gazan man in his 30s, told Xinhua.

But Ibrahim Hassan, a 25-year-old man in Gaza, adopts a different position. "I cannot imagine getting married to a woman doing boxing. If I ask her to prepare a cup of tea and she does not like to do so, she might box me," the young man said with a laugh.
AI in the Common Interest

Wequian Lin/Getty Images

Dec 26, 2022
GABRIELA RAMOS and MARIANA MAZZUCATO

Public policies and institutions should be designed to ensure that innovations are improving the world; but as matters stand, many technologies are being deployed in a vacuum, with advances in artificial intelligence raising one red flag after another. 

The era of light-touch self-regulation must end.

LONDON – The tech world has generated a fresh abundance of front-page news in 2022. In October, Elon Musk bought Twitter – one of the main public communication platforms used by journalists, academics, businesses, and policymakers – and proceeded to fire most of its content-moderation staff, indicating that the company would rely instead on artificial intelligence.

Then, in November, a group of Meta employees revealed that they had devised an AI program capable of beating most humans in the strategy game Diplomacy. In Shenzhen, China, officials are using “digital twins” of thousands of 5G-connected mobile devices to monitor and manage flows of people, traffic, and energy consumption in real time. And with the latest iteration of ChatGPT’s language-prediction model, many are declaring the end of the college essay.

In short, it was a year in which already serious concerns about how technologies are being designed and used deepened into even more urgent misgivings. Who is in charge here? Who should be in charge? Public policies and institutions should be designed to ensure that innovations are improving the world, yet many technologies are currently being deployed in a vacuum. We need inclusive mission-oriented governance structures that are centered around a true common good. Capable governments can shape this technological revolution to serve the public interest.

Consider AI, which the Oxford English Dictionary defines broadly as “the theory and development of computer systems able to perform tasks normally requiring human intelligence, such as visual perception, speech recognition, decision-making, and translation between languages.” AI can make our lives better in many ways. It can enhance food production and management, by making farming more efficient and improving food safety. It can help us bolster resilience against natural disasters, design energy-efficient buildings, improve power storage, and optimize renewable energy deployment. And it can enhance the accuracy of medical diagnostics when combined with doctors’ own assessments.

These applications would make our lives better in many ways. But with no effective rules in place, AI is likely to create new inequalities and amplify pre-existing ones. One need not look far to find examples of AI-powered systems reproducing unfair social biases. In one recent experiment, robots powered by a machine-learning algorithm became overtly racist and sexist. Without better oversight, algorithms that are supposed to help the public sector manage welfare benefits may discriminate against families that are in real need. Equally worrying, public authorities in some countries are already using AI-powered facial-recognition technology to monitor political dissent and subject citizens to mass-surveillance regimes.

Market concentration is also a major concern. AI development – and control of the underlying data – is dominated by just a few powerful players in just a few locales. Between 2013 and 2021, China and the United States accounted for 80% of private AI investment globally. There is now a massive power imbalance between the private owners of these technologies and the rest of us.

But AI is being boosted by massive public investment as well. Such financing should be governed for the common good, not in the interest of the few. We need a digital architecture that shares the rewards of collective value creation more equitably. The era of light-touch self-regulation must end. When we allow market fundamentalism to prevail, the state and taxpayers are condemned to come to the rescue after the fact (as we have seen in the context of the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic), usually at great financial cost and with long-lasting social scarring. Worse, with AI, we do not even know if an ex post intervention will be enough. As The Economist recently pointed out, AI developers themselves are often surprised by the power of their creations.

Fortunately, we already know how to avert another laissez-faire-induced crisis. We need an “ethical by design” AI mission that is underpinned by sound regulation and capable governments working to shape this technological revolution in the common interest, rather than in shareholders’ interest alone. With these pillars in place, the private sector can and will join the broader effort to make technologies safer and fairer.

Effective public oversight should ensure that digitalization and AI are creating opportunities for public value creation. This principle is integral to UNESCO’s Recommendation on the Ethics of AI, a normative framework that was adopted by 193 member states in November 2021. Moreover, key players are now taking responsibility for reframing the debate, with US President Joe Biden’s administration proposing an AI Bill of Rights, and the European Union developing a holistic framework for governing AI.

Still, we also must keep the public sector’s own uses of AI on a sound ethical footing. With AI supporting more and more decision-making, it is important to ensure that AI systems are not used in ways that subvert democracy or violate human rights.

We also must address the lack of investment in the public sector’s own innovative and governance capacities. COVID-19 has underscored the need for more dynamic public-sector capabilities. Without robust terms and conditions governing public-private partnerships, for example, companies can easily capture the agenda.

The problem, however, is that the outsourcing of public contracts has increasingly become a barrier to building public-sector capabilities. Governments need to be able to develop AI in ways that they are not reliant on the private sector for sensitive systems, so that they can maintain control over important products and ensure that ethical standards are upheld. Likewise, they must be able to support information sharing and interoperable protocols and metrics across departments and ministries. This will all require public investments in government capabilities, following a mission-oriented approach.

Given that so much knowledge and experience is now centered in the private sector, synergies between the public and private sectors are both inevitable and desirable. Mission-orientation is about picking the willing – by co-investing with partners that recognize the potential of government-led missions. The key is to equip the state with the ability to manage how AI systems are deployed and used, rather than always playing catch-up. To share the risks and rewards of public investment, policymakers can attach conditions to public funding. They also can, and should, require Big Tech to be more open and transparent.

Our societies’ future is at stake. We must not only fix the problems and control the downside risks of AI, but also shape the direction of the digital transformation and technological innovation more broadly. At the start of a new year, there is no better time to begin laying the foundation for limitless innovation in the interest of all.



GABRIELA RAMOS
Writing for PS since 2019
2 Commentaries
Gabriela Ramos is Assistant Director-General for Social and Human Sciences at UNESCO.

MARIANA MAZZUCATO
Writing for PS since 2015
Mariana Mazzucato, Professor in the Economics of Innovation and Public Value at University College London, is Founding Director of the UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, Chair of the World Health Organization’s Council on the Economics of Health For All, and a co-chair of the Global Commission on the Economics of Water. She is the author of The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy (Penguin Books, 2019), The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths (Penguin Books, 2018), and, most recently, Mission Economy: A Moonshot Guide to Changing Capitalism (Penguin Books, 2022).
ABOLISH THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE
January 6 committee member blames Electoral College for attack on Capitol
VESTIGIAL REMAINS OF WHITE SUPREMACY
Maryland Democrat urges reform of US voting system and embrace of national popular vote

John Bowden
Washington DC

Congressman Jamie Raskin blamed the US Electoral College for the growing mistrust and dissatisfaction with America’s election systems in an interview on Sunday.

The Democratic member of the House’s January 6 panel was being interviewed on CBS’s Face the Nation following the release of his committee’s full report on the attack on the US Capitol and broader effort by the Trump campaign to overturn the lawful results of the 2020 election.

During the interview, he spoke about the need to “renovate” and regularly update American institutions of power to work efficiently in the modern era.

“How so?” responded interviewer and host Margaret Brennan.

“The Electoral College now, which has given us five popular vote losers as president in our history, twice in this century alone, has become a danger — not just to democracy, but to the American people,” said Mr Raskin.

“It was a danger on January 6,” he added.

Mr Raskin then said that the US should embrace a popular vote system for the sake of the stability of American democracy: “There are so many curving byways and nooks and crannies in the Electoral College, that there are opportunities for a lot of strategic mischief. We should elect the president the way we elect governors, senators, mayors, representatives, everybody else: whoever gets the most votes wins.”


Supporters of a national popular vote have campaigned for such a reform for decades. A transition to a popular vote system could happen in either of two ways, both of which would require a significant political effort: a Constitutional amendment, or through legislation that would only take effect if a coalition of states totalling a majority of the votes in the Electoral College signed on.

That second effort is already underway, with a number of blue states including California and New York joining the compact. But it still would require a number of red and/or purple states to sign on before reaching the necessary threshold.

Opponents of a popular vote system argue that it would marginalise smaller states in presidential campaigns while giving greater significance to larger population centres. Supporters of the idea contend that residents of those population hubs are marginalised themselves already by the existing system, which narrows the presidential campaigning field (typically) to a handful of battleground states.

Mr Raskin’s home state of Maryland passed legislation joining the National Popular Vote Compact in 2007, pledging its 10 Electoral College votes to the cause.

The January 6 panel including Mr Raskin released its final report about the attack on the Capitol to the public on Thursday. The report detailed much of the committee’s previously-publicised findings as well as new information suggesting that Donald Trump actively sought/is seeking to intimidate or otherwise coerce witnesses against testifying to the Department of Justice, January 6 House committee, and grand jury investigation in Fulton County, Georgia.
UK
Tories are the grinch this Christmas, not striking workers

Jaice Titus writes that the Tories are to blame for the economic crisis, not workers driven to strike because of low pay and poor conditions. We must show solidarity because their fight reflects the struggle of all working people, she argues.


Nurses in England, Wales and Northern Ireland from the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) have taken part in the first of two 12-hour strikes over pay and working conditions, the first such mass walkout of nurses in a century. [GETTY]

On 13 December 2022, Richard Madeley, interviewing Rail Maritime and Transport (RMT) general secretary Mick Lynch on Good Morning Britain, demanded to know why Lynch was targeting Christmas – a sadistic and unkind action, he exclaimed. Madeley went on to clarify his words in an unusually transparent fashion: this was a war against ‘commercial’ Christmas. Madeley and his sort are more concerned that Christmas continues to bear its commercial fruits than they are that working people be granted a pay rise in in line with inflation.

This betrays a concern amongst elites that capital keeps the machine running during Christmas, a time when people are ideologically pushed into a commercial bonanza they can barely afford at the best of times, let alone amid a cost of living crisis.

The establishment has escalated their tirade against workers taking industrial action. In their attempt to diminish public support for the strikes, the Daily Mail showed Lynch as ‘Mick Grinch: The Man Killing Your Christmas’ while the Sun declared ‘You’ve Lost it Lynch’.

''We are living through a crisis that is economic, political, and social. It is plain to most people that nothing seems to work. Many strikers were those keeping the nation's wheels in motion throughout the Covid-19 pandemic. Our railways, education system and NHS cannot provide the services planned, and what remains of the public sector is at breaking point. Something has got to give. The strikes taking place across the country can give workers a sense of hope, and a path out of this desperate mess.''

By focusing their efforts on Lynch, the media obfuscates that the RMT union is made up of its members and 70.2% of the members voted to escalate the strikes for another six months. Most receive no strike pay and every day that they are on strike, they lose out. Going on strike is not a decision taken lightly, especially when prices for food, energy and housing are rising so rapidly. It is often the final option because all other avenues of collective bargaining and negotiations have not worked.

The employers and the government have not given rail workers a pay rise and are intent on tearing up hard won terms and conditions. RMT members have taken eight days of action over the last six months, with employers offering a derisory 4% pay rise – a real terms pay cut with the Retail Price Index of inflation running at a whopping 14%. The RMT have escalated the strikes to eight days in December.

This is an intense confrontation. What happens here is important for all working people. The way rail operators treat their workers is mirrored by how they treat consumers. Many of us pay extortionate amounts for journeys on overbooked, delayed and unsafe trains. A win for the rail workers would be a win for us all.

It isn’t just the RMT, though. This December will see more days lost to strike action than any month since July 1989. Nurses, ambulance workers, postal workers, civil servants, teachers and lecturers – there is an uprising against the low pay, cut and run approach of the Tory government this winter.


So, when GMB, The Sun and the Daily Mail foment anger against strikers, we mustn’t forget what the workers are giving up and how their families will struggle during Christmas. Striking workers are members of our families and people in our communities. As the government and the media tries to create divisions between groups of workers, we should respond by building greater and deeper solidarity.


Lowkey

We are living through a crisis that is economic, political, and social. It is plain to most people that nothing seems to work. Many strikers were those keeping the nation's wheels in motion throughout the Covid-19 pandemic. Our railways, education system and NHS cannot provide the services planned, and what remains of the public sector is at breaking point. Something has got to give. The strikes taking place across the country can give workers a sense of hope, and a path out of this desperate mess.

Many have compared the current crises to the strikes of 1978-9. In 1974, Labour was elected to “bring about a fundamental and irreversible shift in the balance of power and wealth in favour of working people”. They did the very opposite and by 1978 recession and inflation forced workers into striking. In what is known as the Winter of Discontent, public sector workers, journalists and bakers went on strike and started a period of struggle which even trade union leaders could not regulate.

James Callaghan’s Labour could never keep its hold after the winter of 1978 and eventually lost to Margaret Thatcher. Yet, while Thatcher was known for taking down the unions, she gave public sector workers a 25% pay rise in 1979 to prevent a second winter of discontent. Today, despite the country having had three different Prime Ministers and four Chancellors over the last six months, Rishi Sunak and Jeremy Hunt, remain completely divorced from workers concerns, refusing to offer more than 5%.

Sipping on a cocktail of arrogance and hubris, the government fails to comprehend the public mood. Despite the Tories’s stance, and the failure of Keir Starmer’s Labour Party to support the actions, there is widespread sympathy for strikes – 60% of Britons support the nurses strikes. This is a strong base upon which to build further support and solidarity for workers on strike, especially at Christmas.

During the Miners’ Strike of 1984-85, there were remarkable moments of festive solidarity among workers. Women’s Action Groups set up kitchens, distributed food parcels and organised Christmas appeals for miners’ families. Several national newspapers also encouraged pensioners to give up their pension bonus in support of the striking miners. Many did just that, making it possible for these families to celebrate Christmas together. Lorries brought Christmas toys for the children of striking miners from Germany, Belgium and France in a touching display of true Christmas kindness.

Is it possible for our networks to raise funds and show our solidarity to the 500,000 workers who are on strike this Christmas? The people who work on the rails, buses, airports, post offices, and hospitals deserve our support. A defeat for this government would be a victory for all working people. The strikers’ fight is our fight and we should find ways of raising money, visiting the pickets, speaking to colleagues at work about the strikes and spreading the gospel of solidarity.

Jaice Titus is a researcher and activist based in London.
Follow her on Twitter: @jaissance
The Greatest Story Never Told? 
Why we need to talk about Jesus' ‘blackness’

Richard Sudan
21 Dec, 2022

Jesus was one of the most important figures in history, his whitewashing has been used to justify white supremacy, colonialism and imperialism, this is why we must ‘tell the truth’ about him, argues Richard Sudan.


A painting of a black Jesus hanging up at Saint Margaret of Scotland Catholic school. [Photo by Mark Gail/The The Washington Post via Getty Images]

Jesus was a black Palestinian revolutionary, who was born in Africa. To some, this might seem a controversial statement, but when considering the facts, reaching such a conclusion is obvious.

Jesus was born in Bethlehem, Palestine, which at the time of his birth was considered part of North East Africa.

The term Middle East wasn’t coined until the 1850s after the creation of the Suez Canal by the British, long after the lifetime of Jesus.

Naturally, the appearance and characteristics of the people from Palestine at the time reflected the region of the world in which they lived.

Beyond the geographical reality of the holy land in the time of Jesus, there is also an abundance of evidence in the bible itself reflecting the fact that Jesus did not have classic European features as modern day depictions like to indicate, but was in fact a dark-skinned man with curly hair.

''During colonisation, Europeans took their white Jesus with them and used it to preach a doctrine of white supremacy. The notion of white superiority relied on God being represented as white. White deity was used to sell the myth of white superiority. Similarly black inferiority cannot stand up, if God is black.''

Scripture describes Jesus as having hair “like wool” and feet like “burnished brass” and looking at some of those among his lineage suggests that it is unlikely Jesus had white European features.

Rahab the harlot, Tamar, the Queen of Sheba were all of black ancestry and part of Jesus’ genealogy. Abraham too, was born in the city of a black man, Nimrod.

In the book of the songs of Solomon, Solomon says “I am black but I am handsome.”

There are numerous other references speaking to the blackness and African heritage of those in the lineage of Jesus. Let’s not forget too, that when Jesus fled persecution he hid in Egypt among black skinned Africans. What this means when testing the white Jesus myth, is that looking plainly at the available evidence; Jesus most certainly, did not look of northern European descent.

Early depictions of black Jesus

From Ethiopia to Russia many images of Christ reflect him as a dark skinned man. Prior to the European Renaissance it was more commonly accepted that Jesus had features in line with how the people in the region looked at the time. Different cultures eventually painted Christ in their own image, and Europeans were no exception.

What this meant, however, was that during colonisation, Europeans took their white Jesus with them and used it to preach a doctrine of white supremacy.

The notion of white superiority relied on God being represented as white. White deity was used to sell the myth of white superiority. Similarly black inferiority cannot stand up, if God is black.

Voices
Jeanine Hourani

This thinking has persisted in Western society at least, which today remains reluctant to present Jesus as black or as a person of colour opting instead to depict him as one of their own.

While people might debate the best way to characterise Jesus, what’s certain is it is highly unlikely that he looked like the whitened Eurocentric depictions.

The big question is, 2000 years after his death, why does it matter?

A question of representation

Facts matter, but so too does representation.

Hollywood for example, with all its influence, is notorious for producing a majority of movies casting Jesus as a white man, decade after decade. At the same time, Hollywood also stands accused of readily profiting from films portraying black people negatively.

All of this of course is by design and is simply another example of a system operating as intended.

Countries like Britain and the US, which many define as Christian, cannot seem to grasp the notion that Jesus, who was a refugee, looked like the vulnerable migrants trying to enter Britain today, rather than the way he has been portrayed across history by the West.

Britain, which was barely able to accept that the oldest known remains in the country belonged to a black man, embraces white Jesus in the same way it denies or apologises for Winston Churchill’s racism.

White supremacy and racism depend on a number of falsehoods being maintained, and acknowledging Jesus as black means exposing and turning a system, and an entire way of thinking about that system, on its head.

Ancient black history: Jabel Qafzeh

Additionally, when considering the wider historical backdrop to the region, it is unsurprising that some of the oldest remains found in Palestine speak to the African 

Voices  Mariya bint Rehan

A number of remains found in Jabal Qafzeh around 100 years ago are estimated to be between 80-100,000 years old. Recently, modern technology gave the ability to reproduce what one of those remains would have looked like had they been alive today. Jabal Qafzeh 9, bore the clear resemblance and features of a black West African woman.

Black people have been in Palestine for millennia, including the time when Palestine was considered part of Africa, and for thousands of years before that.

We also have to consider the modern context in which Jesus would have lived. As a man of colour persecuted for speaking up for the downtrodden, he’d have seen others punished for the same motive. Indeed, if Jesus were alive today, he and his people would be under siege by the Israeli Occupation Forces. 

Denied entry at borders.

Why? Jesus spoke up for the oppressed, refugees, the marginalised and those cast to the outskirts of society. While European Christianity has often watered-down Christ’s message to simple forgiveness, the fact is, Christ was a black revolutionary with a political, economic and health program who strived for equality and was lynched by the Roman empire as a result.

In this sense Jesus has to be considered in the radical black tradition which has always existed in all parts of the world including Palestine. That tradition has held firm, from the time of Christ to torchbearers like Fatima Bernawi, an Afro-Palestinian resistance fighter who recently died and who became the first Palestinian woman to be imprisoned by Israel after the 1967 war.

Reframing how we think about Jesus might also serve as a counter weight to the churches in the US and UK which unflinchingly support and lobby on behalf of Israel.

Churches with the iconography of black Jesus at the centrepiece are an important voice within the Christian community, where traditionally so many institutions have been completely whitened essentially acting as a conduit to further normalise white supremacy.

By the same token, Christian churches and institutions speaking out against apartheid and racism, challenging the dominant narrative are very much needed to change how we think about Christianity, which in the West at least has often been used to uphold power, rather than to hold it accountable.

With racism being challenged all over the globe, it is important that mainstream perceptions of Jesus change and evolve with the times. We must popularise an accurate portrayal of one of the most important figures in history, revered by so many millions of people all over the world. After all, he continues to have an important political, theological and social role today. Telling the ‘truth’ about Jesus is therefore not simply a matter of racial ‘preference’ in the religious imagery used.

Richard Sudan is a journalist and writer specialising in anti-racism and has reported on various human rights issues from around the world. His writing has been published by The Guardian, Independent, The Voice and many others.
Follow him on Twitter: @richardsudan
Have questions or comments? Email us at: editorial-english@newarab.com






The deadliest year for Mexican journalists

December 27, 2022

MEXICO CITY (AP) – The deadliest year in at least three decades for Mexican journalists and media workers is nearing a close, with 15 slayings – a perilous situation underlined by a brazen near-miss attack this week on one of the country’s most prominent journalists.

Two gunmen astride a motorcycle shot up radio and television journalist Ciro Gómez Leyva’s armored vehicle 200 yards from his home on Thursday night.

The journalist described the attack and posted photos of his vehicle to social media.

Solidarity has grown among Mexico’s press corps amid the carnage, and its members are making increasing noise after each killing.

They also have pushed back against a longtime government narrative that the victims weren’t real journalists or were corrupt.

Still, the killings – 15 counted by The Associated Press – have continued to rise.

This year, many of the dead were small town reporters running their own outlets on a shoestring. Others were freelancers, including for national publications, in big cities like Tijuana.

A vehicle without license plates followed him and then ran his motorcycle off the road, injuring the journalist, the press advocacy group Article 19 said.

That incident drew little notice. But it was national news that shots were fired at Gómez Leyva, who is one of Mexico’s best known journalists. He is a regular critic of the government and a frequent target of President Andrés Manuel López Obrador’s tirades against press criticism.

Nevertheless, López Obrador on Friday condemned the attempt against Gómez Leyva. While acknowledging they had their differences, the president said, “It is completely reprehensible for anyone to be attacked.”

Jan-Albert Hootsen, the Mexico representative for the Committee to Protect Journalists, said that this year the only nation to see more journalists killed is Ukraine, which is fighting the Russian invasion.

“We started gathering data on homicides of journalists in 1992, and it’s been both the highest number of journalist killings in a single year, and we can also say that so far it looks to be the deadliest sexenio (Mexico’s six-year presidential term), which means the deadliest period of a single Mexican president if the trend as things stand right now continues,” Hootsen said.

“Andrés Manuel López Obrador, both during the campaign and as president, has successfully politicised journalism in Mexico more than it has ever been in recent memory,” Hootsen said.

Katherine Corcoran, author of In the Mouth of the Wolf: A Murder, a Cover-up and the True Cost of Silencing the Press, said a big reason that journalist killings have remained stubbornly high in Mexico is that government officials are behind many of them.

“It’s some kind of government corruption that’s being threatened or some kind of government empire that’s being threatened when they go after these journalists,” said Corcoran, a former Associated Press bureau chief in Mexico.

The other factor is that Mexico’s press has become more independent and aggressive, she said. “The reporters really are hitting a nerve and that’s what’s getting them killed.”

Corcoran’s book focused on the 2012 killing one such journalist, Regina Martínez from the national news magazine Proceso. She said Martínez’s murder in the Gulf coast state of Veracruz overturned the government narrative that had long painted journalists who were killed as victims of their own corruption. Martínez was well-known, respected, ethical and believed to be beyond reproach.

Since Martínez was slain in April 2012, at least 86 other journalists and media workers have been killed in Mexico, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists’ data.

While there is more solidarity among Mexico’s journalists, they still receive little support from the Mexican public.

When a journalist is killed, dozens of colleagues gather to protest, but there is generally not an outpouring of anger from society in general.

Corcoran said that stems from a long period when much of Mexico’s press was part of the government machine and took significant amounts of money in exchange for positive coverage. “That idea of paying the press is going to haunt the press in Mexico forever, because it did exist and intermittently came back,” she said.

López Obrador frequently hammers that point during his daily news conferences. His administration cut much of those government payments and he says that is the reason he receives critical coverage.

Much like former US President Donald Trump did, López Obrador dismisses any critical press coverage as coming from corrupt reporters he calls his adversaries.

Last February, after five journalists had already been killed, the president said journalists “lie like they breathe”.

Still, Hootsen said there is not any evidence that federal officials in the current administration are behind violence targetting journalists.

However, he said, “it is very disappointing to see that even though the government is not actively persecuting journalists, it has done very little to prevent the persecution of journalists by other actors, either state or non-state”.

In the absence of that protection, Mexican journalists have become much better prepared for situations of violence by creating formal and informal networks of support and rapid response, as well as strengthening ties to civil society organisations, he said.

But when there are attacks on journalists they seldom lead to arrests and even more rarely to convictions.

“In terms of impunity, we are still seeing just about the same numbers that we’ve always seen, which means that more than 95 per cent of all the murders of journalists linger in impunity,” Hootsen said.

Algerian authorities arrest Ihsane El-Kadi, director of last free media outlet in Algeria

Basma El Atti
Rabat
26 December, 2022

For the past three years, Algerian journalist El-Kadi has faced relentless judicial harassment.


There has not yet been any official announcement on why El-Kadi was arrested [Getty]

Algerian authorities arrested renowned journalist Ihsane El-Kadi on Friday night at his home in Zemmouri, amid a continued crackdown on freedom of speech.

El-Kadi runs the independent station Radio M, which is widely considered the last space for free debate in Algeria.

The journalist's daughter, Tin Hinan El-Kadi, said on social media that a General Directorate of Internal Security (French acronym DGSI) brigade composed of six men in two vehicles had ordered him at half past midnight to follow them to a police station in Ben Aknoun, a suburb of Algiers.

Radio M's website reported that El-Kadi had received a call two hours ahead of his arrest asking him to report immediately to the station, but the journalist said that he was too far from the capital.

No official reason has been given for his arrest, however some observers have speculated that it may be related to a recent post on Twitter.

In his latest tweet, El-Kadi challenged President Abdelmadjid Tebboune's assertion about the recovery of $20 billion from oligarchs linked to late president Abdelaziz Bouteflika.

“The public treasury has recovered 20 billion dollars from the oligarchs of Issaba, said President Tebboune without batting an eyelid!!!! How dare you say something so mathematically crude to reputedly the best educated citizens in Africa?” he tweeted on Friday.

For the past three years, El-Kadi has faced relentless judicial harassment.

In June 2021, he was sentenced to six months in prison without a warrant for an opinion piece on the role of Islamists in the Hirak movement.


MENA Basma El Atti

However, El-Kadi continued to express himself freely while much of the rest of the country's media was being reined in. Many Algerian journalists were forced to self-censor their writing for their safety.

"In recent years we have been forced into self-censorship. Journalists have been imprisoned for reporting. The pressures on media managers pushed us to be careful about what we write," Ali Boukhlef, an Algerian journalist told The New Arab.

In a press release, the board of directors of Interface Média, the agency that brings together Radio M and the Maghreb Emergent news website, said on 23 December that the authorities aim "today more and more clearly to take from us, by various means, our established status as an electronic press publisher".

"Our media platform has been undergoing for three years has no other basis than preventing the free exercise of the profession to inform," read the press release.


In-depth   Basma El Atti

Journalists cornered

Three years after the pro-reform Hirak protests, Algeria remains a dangerous place to be a journalist.

Algeria is ranked 134th out of 180 countries on Reporters Without Borders' (RSF) 2022 World Press Freedom Index.

Algerian authorities are holding at least 280 activists and dozens of journalists in detention, mostly for defamation of politicians or because of posts on social networks.

After toppling the two-decade-long regime of Bouteflika in 2019, Algerians’ path to democracy was soon sabotaged by President Tebboune's fledgling regime.

In addition to a crackdown on freedom of speech, financial hardships over the last twenty years have pushed many titles, including Liberté, Le Matin, La Tribune and the weekly La Nation, to close due to a drop in advertising revenue and sales.

El-Watan, the most widely printed Francophone newspaper in Algeria, recently released a statement predicting that its closure is only "a question of time" due to rising political pressure and economic difficulties.

"The majority of the media [in Algeria] can no longer provide a decent living for journalists," lamented Boukhlef.