Thursday, November 13, 2025

 

Monk seal acoustic breakthrough: Hawai’i study quadruples known call types and detects novel communication strategy


UH Mānoa-Led research reveals 25 call types and a never-before-heard "combinational"  communication strategy in seals



University of Hawaii at Manoa

Two monk seal underwater 

image: 

Two adult Hawaiian monk seals interacting under water.

view more 

Credit: Krista Jaspers





New research led by UH Hawaiʻi Institute of Marine Biology (HIMB) Marine Mammal Research Program (MMRP) has drastically increased our understanding of Hawaiian monk seal (Neomonachus schauinslandi) underwater sound production, revealing a vocal repertoire far more complex than previously described. Published today in Royal Society Open Science, the study analyzed thousands of hours of passive acoustic data and identified 25 distinct underwater vocalizations, a dramatic increase from the six calls previously known from seals in human care. The team also found that Hawaiian monk seals produce these low-frequency calls throughout the day, with consistent vocal types detected across the Hawaiian Archipelago and higher calling rates at sites with greater seal abundance. This breakthrough discovery establishes a baseline for understanding the acoustic world of this highly endangered and endemic Hawaiian species.

Key Discoveries of a Hidden World

"We discovered that Hawaiian monk seals—one of the world’s most endangered marine mammals—are far more vocal underwater than previously known," shares Kirby Parnell, lead author of the study and a PhD candidate with MMRP. "By analyzing over 4,500 hours of recordings from across the Hawaiian Archipelago, we identified more than 23,000 vocalizations representing at least 25 distinct call types."

The study, which deployed passive acoustic recorders at five key monk seal habitats from Molokaʻi to the remote Northwestern Hawaiian Islands, uncovered:

  • Expanded Vocal Repertoire: Researchers identified 20 previously undocumented calls.

  • Novel Communication Strategy: The research provides evidence that monk seals can combine different vocalizations together, creating “combinational calls”—a communication strategy never before reported in any pinniped species.

  • A Foraging Call: The team discovered one novel elemental call type, the Whine, produced during foraging, representing only the second known example of a seal species using vocalizations while pursuing prey.

"We were surprised by the sheer diversity and complexity of monk seal vocalizations,” notes Parnell. “The discovery of combinational calls, where seals link multiple call types together, suggests a previously unknown level of complexity in pinniped acoustic communication. Finding a new call type—the Whine—associated with foraging behavior was also unexpected and suggests that monk seals may use sound not only for mating or socializing, but possibly for foraging purposes as well."

Implications for Conservation in Hawaiʻi

The Hawaiian monk seal is Hawaiʻi’s only endemic marine mammal and a treasured part of Hawaiian culture. This research is vital for the species' conservation, particularly in the face of increasing ocean noise.

"This research provides the first comprehensive description of free-ranging Hawaiian monk seal underwater sound production, an important step toward understanding how they use sound for critical life-history events," explains Lars Bejder, Director of MMRP, Professor at HIMB, and co-author of the study. "Because their vocalizations overlap with the same low-frequency range as many human-generated sounds (e.g. vessel noise), this work also helps us evaluate how ocean noise may affect communication, reproduction, and behavior in this endangered species."

These results lay the foundation for using passive acoustics to monitor monk seal populations across their vast range and to protect their acoustic habitats as human activity persists in Hawaiian waters. Future research will decisively link these documented vocalizations to specific Hawaiian monk seal behaviors, such as foraging, swimming, social interactions, and reproduction. A critical next step involves developing automated detection systems to monitor the seals' acoustic activity more efficiently and non-invasively, providing a powerful, long-term tool for conservation management and ecological understanding.

About the Research Team

The interdisciplinary research team included graduate students, undergraduate students, and recent alumni from the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, as well as coauthors from France and the Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center’s Hawaiian Monk Seal Research Program

“Manually annotating over 23,000 calls by hand is no small feat, and I have a team of interns to thank for helping with the analysis!” shares Parnell. “This research would also not have been possible without the support of the Hawaiian Monk Seal Research Program, who deployed and retrieved the acoustic recorders in the Papahānaumokuākea National Marine Sanctuary.”

This work was supported by NOAA Fisheries via the Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (CESU) award NA19NMF4720181. 

Shouting at seagulls could stop them stealing your food



University of Exeter





Shouting at seagulls makes them more likely to leave your food alone, research shows.

University of Exeter researchers put a closed Tupperware box of chips on the ground to pique herring gulls’ interest.

Once a gull approached, they played either a recording of a male voice shouting the words, “No, stay away, that’s my food”, the same voice speaking those words, or the ‘neutral’ birdsong of a robin.  

They tested a total of 61 gulls across nine seaside towns in Cornwall and found that nearly half of those gulls exposed to the shouting voice flew away within a minute.

Only 15% of the gulls exposed to the speaking male voice flew away, while the rest walked away from the food, still sensing danger.

In contrast, 70% of gulls exposed to the robin song stayed near the food for the duration of the experiment.

“We found that urban gulls were more vigilant and pecked less at the food container when we played them a male voice, whether it was speaking or shouting,” said Dr Neeltje Boogert of the Centre for Ecology and Conservation at Exeter’s Penryn Campus in Cornwall.

“But the difference was that the gulls were more likely to fly away at the shouting and more likely to walk away at the speaking.

“So when trying to scare off a gull that’s trying to steal your food, talking might stop them in their tracks but shouting is more effective at making them fly away.”

The recordings, in which five male volunteers recorded themselves uttering the same phrase in a calm speaking voice and, separately, in a shouting voice, were adjusted to be at the same volume, which suggests gulls can detect differences in the acoustic properties of human voices.

“Normally when someone is shouting, it's scary because it's a loud noise, but in this case all the noises were the same volume, and it was just the way the words were being said that was different,” said Dr Boogert.

“So it seems that gulls pay attention to the way we say things, which we don’t think has been seen before in any wild species, only in those domesticated species that have been bred around humans for generations, such as dogs, pigs and horses.”

The experiment is designed to show that physical violence is not necessary to scare off gulls, and the researchers used male voices as most crimes against wildlife are carried out by men.

“Most gulls aren’t bold enough to steal food from a person, I think they’ve become quite vilified,” said Dr Boogert.

“What we don't want is people injuring them. They are a species of conservation concern, and this experiment shows there are peaceful ways to deter them that don't involve physical contact.”

“Herring gulls respond to the acoustic properties of men’s voices” is published in Biology Letters.

 

 

New research reveals path to sustainable rice farming in Myanmar



Biochar Editorial Office, Shenyang Agricultural University

Nitrogen use for improved profitability and sustainability of rice production in central Myanmar 

image: 

Nitrogen use for improved profitability and sustainability of rice production in central Myanmar

view more 

Credit: Xia Liang, Ian R. Willett, Arjun Pandey, Helen Suter, Gayathri Mekala, So Pyay Thar, Yunrui Li, Baobao Pan, Wenyan Xie & Deli Chen





Scientists have identified practical fertilizer strategies that can help rice farmers in Myanmar boost their profits, protect the environment, and improve food security. Recent research, led by an international team including experts from the University of Melbourne and local partners, provides new recommendations for nitrogen fertilizer use, aiming for a balance between high yields and low environmental costs.

Myanmar is one of Southeast Asia’s largest rice producers, yet struggles with low productivity, financial challenges, and food insecurity. Most local farmers rely on traditional practices, facing obstacles such as limited access to fertilizer, poor infrastructure, and high input costs. The country’s rice fields, vital for local diets and rural livelihoods, are especially sensitive to nitrogen management – the key factor influencing crop growth, environmental health, and farmer income.

Research showed that while rice yields respond modestly to added nitrogen in the monsoon season, dramatic improvements can be achieved through strategic fertilizer use in irrigated dry-season rice. In dry months, crops benefit from higher solar radiation, allowing yields to increase from 4 to 8 tons per hectare with optimized nitrogen inputs. Applying the right amount of fertilizer helps farmers achieve better profits and higher harvests, particularly when irrigation is available.

Yet, using too much nitrogen fertilizer can backfire. Excess inputs not only fail to increase yields but also harm the bacteria and natural processes that keep rice paddies fertile. The runoff of nitrogen-rich water threatens surrounding ecosystems, adding to pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.

The team conducted economic and environmental analyses to pinpoint both “economically optimal” and “ecologically optimal” nitrogen rates. During the monsoon season, the best economic results came from applying around 83 kilograms of nitrogen per hectare, providing a net economic benefit of nearly $617 per hectare. For irrigated dry-season rice, the optimal economic rate was higher, about 202 kilograms per hectare, which brought a $661 per hectare benefit. However, when accounting for the social and ecological costs of pollution and environmental damage, lower nitrogen application rates yielded far greater long-term gains.

By adopting the ecologically optimal nitrogen rates, 66 kilograms per hectare in the monsoon, and 48 kilograms per hectare in the dry season, farmers could reduce pollution and save money, with only a small drop in yield. The researchers estimated that this adjustment could avoid annual environmental costs of up to $368 per hectare, a substantial benefit compared with current practices. These findings offer authorities and farmers a new path to sustainability, where minor yield sacrifices translate into major gains for community health and future generations.

Farmer engagement also played a central role in the project. Surveys and focus groups revealed a strong preference for learning and decision-making through discussion, peer support, and social media such as Facebook. Instead of relying solely on top-down instructions or one-off mobile apps, farmers valued participatory platforms that allow for experience sharing and real-time advice. To support broader adoption of better fertilizer practices, the research team recommends expanding demonstration plots, interactive online forums, and tailored content delivered via popular digital platforms.

Policy-makers in Myanmar have taken note of the findings. New digital resources, databases, and agricultural extension websites are being built to help farmers and suppliers track fertilizer quality and crop management information. This integrated approach, emphasizing economics, ecology, and farmer participation, could transform rice production not just in Myanmar, but across similar regions in Southeast Asia.

The full research article, funded by Australian and Chinese agricultural research agencies, is published in Nitrogen Cycling, Volume 1, 2025.

 

=== 

Journal Reference: Liang X, Willett IR, Pandey A, Suter H, Mekala G, et al. 2025. Nitrogen use for improved profitability and sustainability of rice production in central Myanmar. Nitrogen Cycling 1: e009  

https://www.maxapress.com/article/doi/10.48130/nc-0025-0009  

 

=== 

About Nitrogen Cycling:
Nitrogen Cycling is a multidisciplinary platform for communicating advances in fundamental and applied research on the nitrogen cycle. It is dedicated to serving as an innovative, efficient, and professional platform for researchers in the field of nitrogen cycling worldwide to deliver findings from this rapidly expanding field of science.

Follow us on FacebookX, and Bluesky