Monday, December 01, 2025

Study suggests curiosity and focus could be key factors that make man’s best friend a ‘genius’



Dogs who can learn hundreds of objects by name take part in international study led by the University of Portsmouth




University of Portsmouth

Flynn 

image: 

One of the participating dogs, Flynn, a border collie from the UK. 

view more 

Credit: Deborah Lightfoot




Peer-reviewed, experimental study, animals 

  • First study to investigate what traits distinguish dogs who can learn the labels (names) of hundreds of objects from dogs without this special skill  

  • Curiosity, focus and inhibition are key characteristics that distinguish label learning dogs from other dogs  

  • Study could help to inform tests to determine a dog’s suitability to become a service animal  

Curiosity might have killed the cat, but it could prove to be one of the keys to dogs’ cognitive abilities, according to a study by the University of Portsmouth’s Dog Cognition Centre in England and the Friedrich Schiller University of Jena’s DogStudies Unit in Germany. 

The research, published in the Nature journal Scientific Reports, shows for the first time, that certain cognitive traits - such as curiosity - are the main factors playing a role in the exceptional ability of ‘label-learning dogs’ to recognise many objects by their name.  

Label-learner dogs, as scientists call them, can recognise hundreds of objects by their labels. This means that they can identify a wide range of objects just by being told the name (label), without any additional clues.   

Associate Professor, Dr Juliane  Kaminski from the University of Portsmouth’s School of Psychology, Sport and Health Sciences, said: “Being able to pick out such a wide variety of objects is not something any dog can do. It is extremely rare and appears to be an inherent natural ability which is specific to the dog and not a quality that many dogs have.”  

Dr Kaminski and her German collaborator, Dr Juliane Bräuer, searched to find dogs deemed by their owners to be label learners. They found 11 from five countries, including the UK, USA, Switzerland, the Netherlands and Germany.  

The dogs had to pass a pre-test to be selected for the research. During this test, the dogs had to demonstrate their label-learning abilities and fetch the correct object out of several objects upon hearing the name, while not being able to see their owner or any other person when making the choice.  

As the dogs lived so far apart, the study was conducted as a ‘citizen-science’ project, where the person conducting the study was in fact the dogs’ owner. Owners across the five different countries were instructed in detail, on how to administer a series of eight cognitive tests to their dogs, which tested for things like learning, interest in objects, and communicative skills, for example.  

All the tests were filmed by the owners, which enabled the research team to check that they were conducted correctly as well as to analyse all behaviours and choices of each dog. 

The selected dogs - border collies, crossbreeds, a Spanish waterdog and a pug among them - took part in eight different cognitive tasks to try and identify why these dogs outperform in their ability to learn hundreds of labels of objects.    

Each dog’s curiosity, problem solving, learning, memory, and human communication were tested. Importantly, the same tests were conducted with a corresponding number of dogs who lacked label-learning skills (the control group), and matched in age, sex and breed.  

Dr Bräuer said: “Label learner dogs are so rare that it was not possible to find more than 11 for this particular study. However, to find such clear differences between label learners and the average dogs, was really surprising.”  

In the label learner dogs, three distinct character traits were found to set them apart: 

  • Curiosity - a heightened interested in objects that were new to them 

  • Focus - specific interest in certain objects 

  • Inhibition - an ability to control their reactions to certain objects  

“I am not so surprised that inhibition plays a role here,” added Dr Bräuer. “My own dog who is not a label learner always struggled to inhibit her preferences when solving problems. She likes a ball so much, that she would not fetch a ring when a ball is present.”  

Dr Kaminski added: “We will be carrying out further research as we must explore whether these traits are part of the make-up of some individual dogs from the puppy stage, or whether they develop over time and can be influenced by training.”  

While further research is needed, this study could be the first step towards developing a type of ‘Puppy IQ Test’ whereby young dogs could be assessed for their potential to be able to retrieve a large number of household objects by name, and, in turn, determine their suitability to become service dogs - for example helping the sight and hearing impaired at home, or in police work.  

One of the participating dogs is Harvey, who was recently dubbed one of Britain’s smartest dogs for memorising the names of 203 dog toys. His owner Irene, from Reading, said this latest study has helped shed light on why he has such a unique talent: “It's great to know Harvey’s curiosity is a big part of why he’s so good at identifying objects by name. As an owner, it also helps to be curious. I've always encouraged his interest in toys, so much so that we have over 220 of them!” 

Dr Kaminski’s pioneering research into dog cognition began as a PhD student over 20 years ago after watching a TV show in Germany which featured one exceptionally gifted border collie, named Rico. Dr Kaminski devised a test which showed Rico could label 200 items and could recall words for weeks after being taught them. The study, published in Science in 2004, was the first of its kind.  

She said: “After seeing Rico on TV, I was intrigued and convinced that he was responding to other clues from his owner, but that wasn’t the case. I am still amazed and constantly surprised by what dogs learn.”  

It has been almost a decade since Britain’s first facility dedicated exclusively to studying dogs’ ability to understand humans and the world around them officially opened at the University’ of Portsmouth’s Langstone campus.  

Since then, hundreds of dogs have taken part in games and been given tasks to solve to better understand how they interact with their environment, other dogs or people.  

The research carried out at the centre is strictly observational, and there are no invasive methods of any kind. Dogs are always rewarded with food or play for completing their tasks and games.  

In one study, the team discovered dogs have evolved new muscles around the eyes to better communicate with humans. Dr Kaminski’s research showed dogs moved their eyebrows significantly more when humans were looking at them. The hypothesis being that these ‘puppy dog eyes’ trigger a nurturing response in humans.  

The team has also mapped the facial movements of dogs, naming the movement responsible for a raised inner eyebrow the Action Unit (AU) 101.  

Dr. Juliane Bräuer is head of the research group DogStudies that has just moved from the Max-Plack-Institute of Geoanthropology to the Friedrich-Schiller University of Jena. She is especially interested in dog and human cooperation, and cultural differences in dog human interactions In a recent study she and her team have investigated how dogs read human emotions.   

Sign up for future studies about label learners  

The team is continually on the lookout for these special label learner dogs. Anyone interested in taking part in future studies, can contact them via email on findingricodogs@gmail.com.  

 

More accessible urban parks linked with greater physical activity across US cities



Stanford University



In Brief:

  • Across U.S. cities, greater park accessibility is associated with higher daily physical activity far more than overall urban greenness.

  • Readers can check the rankings of step counts across the 53 cities. Geographic and demographic differences in the results highlight the need to make access to nature more equitable. 

  • Improving ways to connect to existing parks can strengthen public health, guiding future urban planning for healthier cities.

The health benefits of nature are well-known, but its role in encouraging day-to-day physical activity across different regions and demographics has been less clear. This question carries new urgency as the world faces a “physical inactivity pandemic,” with trends especially stark in the United States, where many people fall short of recommended activity levels.

To investigate how urban green spaces influence movement, researchers with the Stanford-based Natural Capital Project (NatCap), a global alliance focused on valuing nature’s benefits to people, analyzed wearable step-counter data in their new study published in Nature Health. They found that higher park accessibility, not simply more greenery, is associated with higher daily activity.

“Greenness alone doesn’t seem to encourage movement,” said Youngeng Lu, lead author of the paper, who did the work while he was a postdoctoral scholar at NatCap. “Even if you have lots of trees or vegetation, if you can’t easily reach them, it doesn’t translate to more physical activity. Accessibility to parks was the factor that mattered most.”

Measuring movement at scale

Past research links nature to physical activity, but many studies rely on self-reported data, focus on only a few cities, or track people for short periods. Those constraints limit how broadly the findings can be applied.

To take the next step in understanding these patterns, the team used multi-year wearable-device data from the All of Us Research Program, a national health initiative. Participants volunteered their Fitbit records, giving researchers three years of daily step counts and activity intensity from 7,013 anonymous users in 53 U.S. metropolitan areas. The team then used modeling that accounted for variations between individual people and cities to test how activity levels shifted with different types of urban nature.

The researchers distinguished between two aspects of urban nature: total greenness (measured from satellite imagery and including forests, gardens, and other vegetation) and park accessibility, which encompasses park existence, distance from population centers, and connectivity to one another. Using participants’ home locations, the team calculated how easy it is for residents to travel to nearby parks on foot.

Although overall greenness didn’t appear to be linked with higher physical activity, park accessibility was a strong predictor of movement. A 10% increase in park accessibility corresponded to roughly 107 additional steps per day.

Who benefits most?

The multi-year dataset allowed researchers to examine how the benefits of park access vary by region and demographic group over time. They also considered variables such as temperature, precipitation, population density, city walkability, and air quality, revealing some telling patterns in the game of step tracking.

Western and southern cities showed stronger links between park accessibility and movement, a trend the team suspects may be influenced by climate, culture, or outdoor habits. Lu emphasized the significant role temperature played in daily step counts. In mild climates, park accessibility had a much stronger effect on physical activity than in cities that are extremely hot or cold, where conditions are less favorable for outdoor exercise.

Demographic trends were also clear. Non-white residents, older adults, and people who were less active at baseline experienced the greatest increase in activity when parks were easier to reach. These results support the “equigenic effect,” in which improved access to green space disproportionately benefits more vulnerable communities.

“For non-white and lower-income neighborhoods, even small increases in park accessibility can encourage significantly more activity,” Lu said. “Parks need to be accessible to everyone, not just higher-income, white populations.” 

Designing healthier cities

The study suggests that building new parks isn’t the only way for cities to increase the physical activity of their residents. Enhancing access to existing parks by improving walkability, removing barriers, and connecting parks to nearby neighborhoods (such as creating pedestrian overpasses) can also deliver public health benefits.

“It’s promising from a health perspective,” said Lisa Mandle, senior author on the paper, and director of science-software integration and lead scientist with NatCap. “Investing in access helps residents be more active and promotes equity in urban health.”

Lu added that the priority now is ensuring that the benefits of park access are shared equitably across cities. Future research could track changes in accessibility over time, incorporate GPS data to measure actual park use, and recruit more diverse participants to strengthen the evidence.

By continuing to explore nature’s role in public health, the team hopes to “inform urban planning decisions and inspire interventions that make cities healthier, greener, and more equitable for everyone,” Lu said.

“This study arose out of our efforts to understand how parks and nature in cities can benefit the people living there,” said Mandle. “We know green spaces provide mental health benefits, but we wanted to look more closely at physical activity, and specifically, who benefits most and in what contexts.”

This aligns with the broader goals of NatCap: “to advance understanding of the diversity of ways that nature benefits people in order to incorporate these values into decision-making,” Mandle said.


Acknowledgements

Other NatCap Stanford co-authors are Anne Guerry, Yingjie Li, Anders Rydström, Tong Wu, and Gretchen Daily. Daily is also the Bing Professor of Environmental Science in the Department of Biology, director of the Center for Conservation Biology at Stanford, and a senior fellow at the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment.  Stanford School of Medicine co-authors are Abby King, Ann Hsing, and Chethan Sarabu. King is also a member of the Cardiovascular Institute, the Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance, the Stanford Cancer Institute, and an affiliate of the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment. Hsing is also part of the Center for Innovation in Global Health at Stanford. Sarabu is also with Cornell Tech

Additional authors are Markus Reichert from the University of Salzburg and the Central Institute of Mental Health (CIMH), Medical Faculty Mannheim at University of Heidelberg; Quan Yuan of Tongji University; Iris Reinhard of CIMH, Medical Faculty Mannheim at University of Heidelberg; Johanna Rehder of University of Salzburg; Kari Nadeau of Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; and Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg of CIMH, Medical Faculty Mannheim at Heidelberg University.

This research was funded by the Stanford Woods Institute Realizing Environmental Innovation Program, the Cyrus Tang Foundation, the Heinz Family Foundation, the Marianne & Marcus Wallenberg Foundation, John Miller, and Kristy Hsiao.

NatCap Stanford is based out of the Woods Institute for the Environment within the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability, and the Department of Biology within Stanford’s School of Humanities & Sciences.

Three-quarters of the world not getting enough omega-3, research shows




University of East Anglia




More than three-quarters of the global population aren’t getting enough Omega-3, according to new research from the University of East Anglia, the University of Southampton and Holland & Barrett.

The collaborative review highlights that 76 per cent of people worldwide are not meeting recommended intakes of EPA and DHA, revealing a significant global public health gap.

The study is the first global review of national and international omega-3 intake recommendations across all life stages for generally healthy people.

Prof Anne Marie Minihane, from UEA’s Norwich Medical School, said: “Our research looks at recommendations for omega-3 fats and how they compare to what people are actually eating.

“We found big gaps between what’s advised and what most of us consume. To close that gap, we need easier, sustainable ways to get these important nutrients - like foods enriched with omega-3s or supplements. These changes could help more people enjoy the health benefits linked to higher intakes.

“We hope this work will help inform nutritional scientists, clinicians, food and supplement industries, policy makers and consumer communities,” she added.

Dr Abbie Cawood, Science Director at Holland & Barrett and Visiting Research Fellow at the University of Southampton, said: “The health benefits of long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, specifically eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) are too important to ignore.

“Achieving recommended intakes from diet alone can be challenging, highlighting the need for accessible, sustainable sources of EPA and DHA. Omega-3s play such a vital role in health, ensuring people can meet their needs either through diet or with the support of supplementation is essential at every life stage.

“In fact, our review highlights that supplementation is often required to meet recommended intakes especially in pregnancy and those with low fish intakes. We are hopeful that this publication can act as an enabler to inform omega-3 dietary guidelines and shape future nutrition policy and public health strategies.”

Prof Philip Calder from University of Southampton added: “The omega-3s EPA and DHA are essential for health throughout the lifecourse. But to benefit from these nutrients, people first need to understand how much they should be consuming.

“In this review, we brought together all the recommendations for EPA and DHA intake in healthy populations from authorities around the world to help answer the important question: ‘how much do I need?’ What is clear is that most people are not meeting these recommendations.”

Omega-3 consumption supports a healthy lifestyle throughout all stages of life - from reducing the chance of pre-term birth and supporting visual and cognitive development in infants, right through to improving cardiovascular health and immune function. It is also associated with reduced risk of depression and cognitive decline, including Alzheimer’s disease.

This global review highlights the lack of alignment between current evidence, public health guidance and actual population intakes, and aims to address confusion around omega-3s recommendations, highlighting the health benefits of increased intake across all life stages in healthy populations.

While previous guidance often focused on key stages like pregnancy, birth or age-related disease, this publication covers all life stages, making guidance relevant and accessible for the general population.

It highlights that guidance around omega-3 intake currently varies by country, creating a significant amount of confusion across the globe and reinforces the importance of consistent evidence-based guidance.

The paper aims to support public health on a global scale and offers guidance to countries outside Europe and North America, for example in Latin America and parts of Asia including India to develop public guidelines around safe intake levels and supplementation advice.

The review found that the most frequently recommended intake for adults is 250 mg per day of combined EPA and DHA, with an additional 100–200 mg of DHA advised for pregnant women. These targets can be achieved by eating more oily fish, such as salmon or mackerel, or through supplementation where needed.

The paper also identified challenges that different populations have in achieving current omega-3 recommendations, such as difficulties in meeting oily fish recommendations due to low seafood consumption, or sustainability concerns, as well as some populations having limited access to supplementation advice.

The retailer hopes this publication will serve as a valuable resource for nutritional science, medical and industry professionals, and will help underpin its future product development.

This review was conducted in partnership with Prof Philip Calder (University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine), Prof Minihane (University of East Anglia and Norwich Medical School), Fionna Page and Claire James expert dietitians from at First Page Nutrition Ltd, and Dr Cawood, Science Director at Holland & Barrett and Dr Sophie Putnam, Head of Science at Holland & Barrett.

‘An overview of national and international long chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid intake recommendations for healthy populations’ is published in the journal Nutrition Research Reviews.