Tuesday, December 02, 2025

Idaho bar dog-piled with one-star reviews after offering free beer for helping ICE

Alexander Willis
November 30, 2025 
RAW STORY


Federal immigration officers wait for respondents to depart from their hearings to conduct targeted detainments at U.S. immigration court in Manhattan, in New York City, U.S., November 26, 2025. REUTERS/David 'Dee' Delgado

A bar in Idaho is getting pummeled with one-star reviews online after offering customers “free beer for one month” if they provide proof of having assisted Immigration and Customs Enforcement in deporting an undocumented migrant.

“ALERT: Anyone who helps ICE identify and ultimately deport an illegal from Idaho gets FREE BEER FOR ONE MONTH at Old State Saloon!” reads an online post Saturday from Old State Saloon, a bar and grill in Eagle, Idaho.

The bar’s Google page was immediately flooded with negative reviews, many of which staff at Old State Saloon responded to, calling reviewers “angry progressive liberals” and “liars.”

“And the 1 star reviews roll in from the loser LEFT,” reads another post from the Old State Saloon X account.

One such one-star review reads: “Don’t bother. Place is trashy and overly political.” Old State Saloon staff, in turn, responded to the review.

“Another liar. Politics is not our entire personality. We have locally focussed food and entertainment along with organic coffee that is FREE for veterans!” reads the response from Old State Saloon.


“We host home school meetups, line dancing lessons, karaoke nights, etc. [You] must be an angry progressive liberal to be so sensitive and such a liar.”

Old State Saloon even resorted to attacking one-star reviews that made no mention of the bar’s political activism, such as from one reviewer who called the food “super greasy.”

“Liar,” Old State Saloon responded. “You never came to Old State Saloon. Let me guess, another lib? All you people do is lie, lie, lie.”

The post gained enough traction that the official X account for the Department of Homeland Security reported Old State Saloon’s initial post, drawing even more attention to Old State Saloon from both supporters and critics alike.“Oh so this is where the Nazis hang out in Idaho?” wrote X user “Wu Tang is for the Children,” a popular political and cultural commentator who’s amassed more than 281,000 followers.




Trump-tapped economist describes poverty as ‘a choice’ in rant against SNAP recipients


Alexander Willis
December 1, 2025 
RAW STORY


Economist E.J. Antoni speaks on Fox Business' "The Big Money Show," Dec. 1, 2025.
 (Screengrab / Fox Business)

Economist E.J. Antoni, who President Donald Trump nominated to take charge of the Labor Department before reversing course, erupted at Americans receiving federal food assistance on Monday on Fox Business, claiming that many of them chose to live in poverty.

There are around 42 million Americans – including 16 million children – who receive food assistance through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, which, due to Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act, is projected to boot at least 2.4 million people from the program, though it may affect as many as 22.3 million families over 10 years.

And, while the program provides an average monthly benefit of just under $188 per month in food assistance, with strict income caps that average out across the nation at $20,352 per year, Antoni considered it a “moral issue” for many Americans to even receive said benefits.

“Yes, you can see how many of them are in poverty, have little to no income, but for many of these people, that's a choice!” Antoni said. “That's not right, and this is actually a moral issue, it's not just economic; it is morally wrong that the taxpayer is footing the bill for people who can but are simply choosing not to work. That's not right!”

Fox Business anchor Taylor Riggs jumped into the conversation as well, and recalled how her father – who she suggested owned a business – struggled to hire workers amid the COVID-19 pandemic due to offering low wages, or, at least, wages lower than what unemployment benefits offered, which the CARES Act bolstered with an additional $600 per week for three months, later lowered to $300 before ultimately expiring.

“I firmly believe in my blood [that] there is dignity in work. Work is a moral issue; it's good for the soul, it's good for families, it's good for communities, it's good for your work ethic, it's good for kids to see moms and dads go off to work every day,” Riggs said.

“...We're undergoing a shift in society right now where there are some younger workers who don't want to work, maybe where there's sort of this entitlement, and I'm hoping that that isn't the case. Is that changing? Is this new generation thinking 'nah, I feel entitled, I kind of want to sit at home and collect that paycheck, I'm not sure I want revenue, I think I want handouts!'”



Trump slapped with major lawsuit as Costco demands refund on his tariffs

D.E.I. AND UNIONIZED

Matthew Chapman
December 1, 2025 
RAW STORY


FILE PHOTO: Shopping carts are seen at the Costco store ahead of Black Friday in Arlington, Virginia, U.S., November 27, 2024. REUTERS/Benoit Tessier/File Photo

The wholesale membership big-box chain Costco is suing the Trump administration, demanding a refund on its tariff expenses.

According to NBC News, "The company said in a Nov. 28 filing that it is seeking a 'full refund' of all ... duties paid as a result of President Donald Trump's executive order which imposed what he called 'reciprocal' tariffs," on the grounds that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize him to unilaterally impose tariffs in the first place.

Trump's "reciprocal tariffs" levy billions of dollars in taxes on Americans who import from practically any foreign country, based on calculations of the U.S. trade balance with those countries — even if a trade surplus or deficit exists for reasons other than statutory trade laws.

“Because IEEPA does not clearly authorize the President to set tariffs ... the Challenged Tariff Orders cannot stand and the defendants are not authorized to implement and collect them,” stated Costco's legal filings.

This comes as the Supreme Court is weighing a landmark case that decides precisely whether IEEPA gives the president the authority to impose tariffs.

Trump has repeatedly taken to his Truth Social platform to demand the Supreme Court let him do what he wants, saying in one recent rant that “The USA is respected again, respected like never before. All of this was brought about by Strong Leadership and TARIFFS, without which we would be a poor and pathetic laughingstock again. Evil, American hating Forces are fighting us at the United States Supreme Court. Pray to God that our Nine Justices will show great wisdom, and do the right thing for America!”

Costco has clashed with MAGA forces on previous occasions as well, having fended off an attempt by a Trump-aligned think tank to pressure its shareholders into abolishing the company's diversity policies.
'Grotesque': Ex-DOJ pardon attorney slams Trump for freeing Ponzi schemer  

GRIFTER PARDONS GRIFTER

Robert Davis
December 1, 2025
RAW STORY


Donald Trump in the Oval Office (Photo via Reuters)

A former Department of Justice pardon attorney slammed President Donald Trump on Monday for freeing a billion-dollar Ponzi schemer from federal prison just before Thanksgiving.

The White House confirmed on Monday that Trump commuted the sentence of David Gentile, the former CEO of GPB Capital, who was convicted in May of wire and bank fraud charges, according to a report by CNN. Gentile was just 12 days into his seven-year sentence when Trump commuted it.

CNBC reported that Gentile defrauded tens of thousands of investors while at GPB Capital, costing them billions. The investigation into Gentile began in 2018, during Trump's first term, and one of Trump's DOJ attorneys pushed the courts to give Gentile a 15-year sentence earlier this year.

Liz Oyer, a former pardon attorney, commented on Trump's decision to commute Gentile's sentence in a new YouTube video.

"Once again, Trump has offered no explanation to the American people or to the victims of Gentile's fraud," Oyer said in the video, arguing that he tried to keep the clemency a "secret."

"We cannot let these corrupt abuses of the pardon power fly under the radar," she continued.

Gentile is not the first white-collar criminal the Trump administration has freed since taking office. Trump also pardoned Changpeng Zhao, the billionaire founder of cryptocurrency trading platform Binance. Zhao was convicted on money laundering charges, and his company paid more than $4 billion in fines.

"This is another grotesque abuse of the pardon power that should outrage all Americans," Oyer said in a post on X.


‘Shamelessly Corrupt’: Trump Frees Private Equity Executive Convicted of Defrauding 10,000+ Investors

One elderly victim said they “lost a significant portion” of their retirement savings to David Gentile’s $1.6 billion scheme.



US President Donald Trump speaks during a press conference in the Oval Office of the White House on October 15, 2025 in Washington, DC.
(Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)


Jake Johnson
Dec 01, 2025
COMMON DREAMS

In yet another gift to corporate criminals, President Donald Trump has reportedly used his executive authority to commute the seven-year prison sentence of a former private equity executive convicted of defrauding more than 10,000 investors of around $1.6 billion.

David Gentile, the founder and former CEO of GPB Capital, was convicted of securities and wire fraud last year and sentenced to prison in May, but he ended up serving just days behind bars. The New York Times reported over the weekend that the White House “argued that prosecutors had falsely characterized the business as a Ponzi scheme.”

One victim said they lost their “whole life savings” to the scheme and are now living “check to check.” Another, who described themselves as “an elderly victim,” said they “lost a significant portion” of their retirement savings.

“This money was earmarked to help my two grandsons pay for college,” the person said. “They had tragically lost their father and needed some financial assistance. So this loss attached my entire family.”

In a statement following Gentile’s sentencing earlier this year, FBI Assistant Director in Charge Christopher Raia—who was appointed to the role by Trump’s loyalist FBI director, Kash Patel—said the private equity executive and his co-defendant, Jeffry Schneider, “wove a web of lies to steal more than one billion dollars from investors through empty promises of guaranteed profits and unlawfully rerouting funds to provide an illusion of success.”

“The defendants abused their high-ranking positions within their company to exploit the trust of their investors and directly manipulate payments to perpetuate this scheme,” said Raia. “May today’s sentencing deter anyone who seeks to greedily profit off their clients through deceitful practices.”

Critics said Trump’s commutation of Gentile’s sentence sends the opposite message: That the administration is soft on corporate crime and rich fraudsters despite posturing as fierce protectors of the rule of law and throwing the book at the vulnerable.

“Trump will deport an Afghan living in the US with Temporary Protected Status if he is accused of stealing $1,000,” said US Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.). “But he’ll set a white dude free who was convicted of stealing $1.6 billion from American citizens to go commit more crime.”

After criticizing former President Joe Biden for commuting the sentences of death-row prisoners, Trump has wielded his pardon power to spare political allies—including January 6 rioters—and rich executives while his administration works to “delegitimize the very concept of white-collar crime.”

Since the start of Trump’s second term, his administration has halted or dropped more than 160 federal enforcement actions against corporations, according to the watchdog group Public Citizen. White-collar criminals reportedly view Trump as their “get-out-of-jail-free card.”

“The most shamelessly corrupt administration in history,” journalist Wajahat Ali wrote in response to the Gentile commutation.




USA

Violence and Death at Home and Abroad

Monday 1 December 2025, by Dan La Botz





Rahmanullah Lakanwal, an Afghan immigrant, walked up to two Virginia National Guard members stationed in Washington, D.C. on November 26 and shot them point blank. One of them, Sarah Beckstrom, 20, died of her injuries, while the other, 24-year-old Andrew Wolfe, remains in critical condition. Lakanwal was also severely wounded and he has ben accused of murder. À Following the shootings, Trump immediately paused migration from Afghanistan and 19 other “Third World Countries,” in Africa and Asia. He is pouring fuel on the fire of xenophobia.

Trump said of the shooter, “He went cuckoo, he went nuts. And that happens, happens too often with these people.” Well, who are “these people”? How did Lakanwal lose his mind? The U.S. war against Afghanistan began in 2001 when Lakanwal was five years old, when he reached adulthood, he joined a “Zero Unit” run by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). These units have been described by diplomats and human rights organizations as “death squads” that carried out extrajudicial killings.

When the war ended in 2021 with the victory of the Taliban and the withdrawal of U.S. troops, tens of thousands of Afghans, including Lakanwal and his family, were given refuge in the United States. He settled in Bellingham, Washington. His wartime experiences murdering people for the CIA in his homeland evidently left him with post-traumatic stress disorder and one day he lost his mind, traveled 3,000 miles to Washington, D.C., walked up to a Guard unit, and shot Beckstrom and Wolfe.

The CIA death squads drove Lakanwal crazy, and it was Trump who as part of his campaign against Democratic Party mayors sent the National Guard to Washington. The CIA and Trump can be held responsible for Sarah Beckstrom’s death.

Now in the Caribbean, the United States is heading into another war that will also have its CIA and Zero Unit death squads, leading to more trauma and more violence not only abroad but here at home too. Trump continues murder on the high seas, having blown up 22 boats and killed 83 people. He claims that the boats are carrying drugs that will harm Americans, which he says constitutes a war on the U.S. and therefore give him the right to wage war on drug smugglers. The Trump administration has offered no proof that the boats and the people on them are drug dealers, but even if it did, the U.S. government would have no right to kill them.

The Washington Post reports that, according to two witnesses, Pete Hegseth, Secretary of Defense, gave a verbal order during one attack. “The order was to kill everybody.” When in one attack two survivors in the sea clung to debris, following Hegseth’s orders, they were blown to bits. Hegseth is a war criminal for ordering the killing of unarmed civilians. This is precisely the reason that six U.S. congresspeople, all with military backgrounds, recently posted a video saying military personnel should and must refuse illegal orders. Trump called those legislators traitors.

The attacks on the boats form part of Trump’s growing campaign against Venezuela that could lead to war at any moment. The Trump administration, which doesn’t recognize Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro’s government, it has accused him of being the head of the Cartel de Los Soles, a government-led drug cartel, and it has offered a $50 million reward for Maduro’s capture. Trump has sent a U.S. carrier group to the waters off Venezuela and has 15,000 troops in the area. He also announced the closing of Venezuelan airspace and threatened to attack Venezuela on land soon.

The U.S. war against Afghanistan lasted twenty years and a war against Venezuela could become a protracted conflict as well. Trump and Hegseth will have responsibility not only for the war, but for the long chain of events that follow, with more trauma and more violence.

2 December 2025


Attached documentsviolence-and-death-at-home-and-abroad_a9293.pdf (PDF - 905.2 KiB)
Extraction PDF [->article9293]


Dan La Botz was a founding member of Teamsters for a Democratic Union (TDU). He is the author of Rank-and-File Rebellion: Teamsters for a Democratic Union (1991). He is also a co-editor of New Politics and editor of Mexican Labor News and Analysis.


International Viewpoint is published under the responsibility of the Bureau of the Fourth International. Signed articles do not necessarily reflect editorial policy. Articles can be reprinted with acknowledgement, and a live link if possible.

Monday, December 01, 2025

What Right Does Japan Have to Pronounce about Taiwan?


Chinese chairman Xi Jinping met with Japanese prime minister Sanae Takaichi, at her request in Gyeongju, on 31 October, in the Republic of Korea.

The recently ensconced Japanese prime minister Sanae Takaichi began her early leadership with a major diplomatic gaffe when she said a Chinese attack on Taiwan could constitute “a survival-threatening situation” for Japan requiring the use of force.

Beijing is apoplectic. Fu Cong, Beijing’s ambassador to the UN, accused Takaichi of committing “a grave violation of international law.”

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said, “It is shocking that Japan’s current leaders have publicly sent the wrong signal of attempting military intervention in the Taiwan issue, said things they shouldn’t have said, and crossed a red line that should not have been touched.”

Takaichi seems oblivious of Article 9 of Japan’s constitution which renounces war and forbids Japan from using force to settle international disputes.

Moreover, two of the principles agreed to in the 1972 Japan-China Joint Communiqué read:

2. The Government of Japan recognizes the Government of the People’s Republic of China as the sole legal Government of China.

3. The Government of the People’s Republic of China reiterates that Taiwan is an inalienable part of the territory of the People’s Republic of China. The Government of Japan fully understands and respects this stand of the Government of the People’s Republic of China, and it firmly maintains its stand under Article 8 of the Potsdam Proclamation.

Not only is Takaichi oblivious of the country’s constitution and the joint communiqué, she is also seemingly oblivious of Japanese history.

A modernized and expansionist Japan went to war and defeated the Qing dynasty. One requirement of the Treaty of Shimonoseki, 1895, was that China cede Taiwan to Japan.

Japan’s further expansionism and militarism led to its defeat after WWII. Thus, Japan would have to relinquish ill-gotten territories. The Cairo Declaration of 1943 states:

[A]ll the territories Japan has stolen from the Chinese, such as Manchuria, Formosa, and The Pescadores, shall be restored to the Republic of China.

This is affirmed by the Potsdam Proclamation of 1945:

The terms of the Cairo Declaration shall be carried out and Japanese sovereignty shall be limited to the islands of Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, Shikoku and such minor islands as we determine.

The major historical documents clearly point to Chinese sovereignty over Taiwan.

Despite China having asked for clarification and a retraction of Takaichi’s erroneous remarks, no such clarification or retraction has been forthcoming.

Why would Takaichi even make such ignorant remarks? What did she hope to gain? Assuredly not an economic rupture of the economically challenged Japan from China.

A Thai news website headlined “Japan hit hard as China imposes tourism sanctions amid diplomatic tensions.”

China’s travel sanctions following diplomatic tensions with Japan have triggered mass flight cancellations, severe tourism losses and a projected ¥2.2tn annual economic impact.

Japan has expressed remorse for its WWII atrocities, but no official government apology has ever been issued. Meanwhile, Japanese politicians, including Takaichi (although she skipped such a visit during the 2025 autumn festival) have continued to visit the Yasukuni Shrine, said to house the kami of Japanese dead including class-A war criminals eliciting anger among countries violated by Japan during WWII.

Among the heinous crimes are the recruitment of ianfu (comfort women; i.e., sex slaves for Japanese military); the Rape of Nanking, the gore of Japanese militarism archived in the the Memorial Hall of the Victims in Nanjing, China; and the gruesome experimentation on humans exhibited at the Unit 731 Museum in Harbin, China.


Evidence of Japanese atrocities during the Rape of Nanking in a trailer for 2025 movie Dead to Rights

Japan has much to apologize and atone for. Yet Takaichi’s remarks indicate an apology and atonement is not soon forthcoming from Japan. This reflects poorly on the loser of WWII, a nation still occupied by the US military, a nation considered by many a vassal state — also echoed by US media.

Hanging onto American apron strings is unlikely to resurrect the Japanese economy, whereas entering into a mutually respectful relationship with the nearby soaring economy of China should bode well for a future prosperous Japan.

However, the nascence of a sovereign Japan starts with a sincere apology to all those nations and peoples Japan violated during WWII.

Kim Petersen is an independent writer. He can be emailed at: kimohp at gmail.com. Read other articles by Kim.

 


Trump Commands Venezuela’s Heavens Closed



US President Trump ordered the airspace above and surrounding Venezuela “closed in its entirety” on November 29.

Yet the US has as much legal and moral authority to shutter the skies over Venezuela as the Venezuelans have to close the putting greens at Mar-a-Lago. Yes, that’s ridiculous – but not any more so than Washington’s phony pretext of drug interdiction for their deadly regime-change offensive against Venezuela.

To date, the Yankee military has murdered over 80 people in alleged “drug boats” in the southern Caribbean and eastern Pacific but has yet to confiscate a single milligram of narcotics from Venezuela. The Venezuelan authorities, in contrast, have seized 64 tons of cocaine this year that were being transited through their country and have done so without killing a single person.

However, Venezuela’s interdiction pales in comparison to the 400 tons of cocaine smuggled into the US enabled by one Juan Orlando Hernández, according to the US Department of Justice. Hernández is a former Honduran president and right-wing Washington ally. He was convicted in a US jury trial for running his country like a narco state, taking bribes from Sinaloa Cartel kingpin Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán.

The day before Trump “closed” Venezuela’s airspace as part of his so-called “crackdown on drug cartels,” he announced his intention to pardon convicted cartel-enabler Hernández, who is serving a 45-year sentence at a penitentiary in West Virginia.

If Washington succeeds in blocking air travel to Venezuela, the action has an added cruelty. It coincides with the winter holidays, when overseas Venezuelans would return home to visit family. Many of these migrants are economic refugees, driven from their homeland largely by the US’s unilateral coercive measures designed to asphyxiate Venezuela’s economy.

The CEO of America’s empire has ambitions for vast powers and now claims dominion over the firmaments. Yet the US Congress has not approved his no-fly zone, nor has any international authority such as the United Nations – and certainly not the host country, which under international law has sole control over its airspace. Even David Deptula, the retired general who enforced a no-fly zone in Iraq, questioned Trump’s declaration.

Such an act constitutes a blockade and, as such, is considered an act of war; more precisely, an escalation of an ongoing hybrid war against Venezuela.

The offensive has taken many forms – unilateral economic sanctionscoup and assassination attempts, a dual governmentdiplomatic intrigueelection interference, an astroturf opposition, and a psychological pressure campaign by compliant corporate press. The hybrid war is as deadly as a hot war, having taken over 100,000 lives by denying essential food, medicines, and fuel to the most vulnerable, according to a United Nations special rapporteur.

But Washington’s quarter-century siege of Venezuela has “failed” in its objective of regime-change. For the imperial hegemon, the success of the Venezuelan resistance has led it to push its campaign to the brink of military invasion with the no-fly zone declaration serving as an ominous harbinger.

The political leadership of Venezuela’s Bolivarian Revolution includes President Nicolás Maduro, Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello, and Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino López. These officials are distasteful to Trump and Rubio. The US State Department State Department designated them as leaders of a “foreign terrorist organization,” the Cartel de los Soles.

But then again, the current US president is distasteful to 60% of his constituents. And the so-called Cartel de los Soles doesn’t exist.

In 2002, the US backed an abortive coup that attempted to overthrow then Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez, who was restored to power by a spontaneous uprising of the people. That event had a century-old precedent, as Venezuelan-Canadian sociologist María Paez Victor recalls:

In 1902, English and German gunboats attacked Venezuela and their marines invaded. The Europeans were demanding payment of outrageous loans their banks had forced upon the country. The president, Cypriano Castro, had no money and hardly any armed forces. But he appealed directly to the people in a Proclamation that became a historic monument to the love of Venezuelans for their country.

Its opening sentence is a call to defend the land from invaders: “Venezuelans, the insolent foot of the Stranger has profaned the sacred soil of our Homeland.”

People rushed with whatever arms they could lay their hands on. Even our newly sainted doctor, José Gregorio Hernández, a veritable man of peace, rushed to give aid to the wounded. The foreign marines were routed – they had never expected such a firm, unbeatable stand. They thought it would be a piece of cake; they were deadly wrong.

Washington now stands at a crossroads of its own making. Having failed to crush Venezuela through sanctions, coups, diplomatic isolation, economic strangulation, and psychological warfare, it now toys with measures that violate the Zone of Peace, proclaimed by the 33 members nations of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC).

The US attempt to impose a no-fly zone exposes a desperate imperial drive for domination. The Bolivarian Revolution, having endured more than 25 years of siege, remains rooted in the same collective resolve that once repelled foreign gunboats and reversed the 2002 coup. Should Washington escalate further, it will not confront a compliant colony, but a nation prepared to defend its airspace, institutions, and sovereignty – joined by a genuine international community in solidarity.

Meanwhile CNN reports “massive disapproval” of Trump’s Venezuela policy, and the Simón Bolívar Airport is operating normally.

Roger D. Harris was an international observer for Venezuela’s 2024 presidential election. He is with the US Peace Council and the Task Force on the AmericasRead other articles by Roger.

Soldiers of Solidarity — Part III

No Truth in the World


Our soldiers did not go to Africa to conquer, but to liberate.” — Fidel Castro1

Read Part I and Part II.


In late 1975, as Angola prepared to cast off Portuguese rule, its fragile independence was threatened by apartheid South Africa’s armies and CIA‑backed mercenaries. Into this storm stepped Cuba. Within weeks, Havana launched Operación Carlota, named after an enslaved woman who led a rebellion in Cuba in 1843. Though Carlota was killed, her spirit lived on — carried across the Atlantic as a symbol of resistance.2

Cuba’s intervention was not driven by material gain. Thousands of Cuban lives were lost, yet Havana demanded no oil, diamonds, or gold. Fidel Castro made clear the mission’s purpose: “We are fulfilling our duty to humanity. We are not seeking oil, diamonds, or gold. We are seeking justice.”3

Historians have emphasized the significance of this choice. Piero Gleijses, a leading scholar of the conflict, concluded that “Cuba’s role in Angola changed the course of African history.”4 His research shows how Cuban solidarity altered the balance of power in southern Africa.

Nelson Mandela himself recognized this sacrifice. Speaking in Havana in 1991, he declared: “The defeat of the apartheid army at Cuito Cuanavale was a turning point for the liberation of our continent — and of my people — from the scourge of apartheid.”5

Over sixteen years, more than 337,000 Cuban soldiers and advisors served in Africa. They fought alongside liberation movements in Guinea‑Bissau, Mozambique, and Namibia, living among the people and sharing their hardships.67 Their presence offered protection against colonial aggression and apartheid expansion.

The decisive moment came at Cuito Cuanavale in 1987–1988. Cuban, Angolan, and Namibian forces halted South Africa’s advance in what became the largest battle on African soil since World War II.8 The confrontation forced Pretoria to the negotiating table, opening the road to Namibian independence and accelerating the demise of apartheid. Vijay Prashad later summarized: “Cuba’s role in Angola changed the course of African history.”9

By the early 1990s, apartheid was crumbling, Namibia stood free, and Angola had preserved its sovereignty. Cuba’s soldiers had acted as midwives of freedom, their sacrifice woven into the liberation of nations.10

The legacy of this internationalist mission is not carved in monuments but written in the independence of peoples. From Carlota’s rebellion in Cuba to the victory at Cuito Cuanavale, the thread of solidarity remained unbroken. Cuba’s “young flowers” — its soldiers of conscience — shed their blood far from Havana, leaving behind a river of justice that nourished Africa’s liberation.

ENDNOTES:

  • 1
    Fidel Castro. “Speech in Havana on Angola.” December 1975. Transcript in Granma archives; reprinted in Pathfinder Press collections.
  • 2
    “Operation Carlota.” Radio Grito de Baire archives, 1975.
  • 3
    Fidel Castro. Speech on Cuba’s Duty to Humanity. Havana, 1980. Transcript in Pathfinder Press collections.
  • 4
    Piero Gleijses. Visions of Freedom: Havana, Washington, Pretoria, and the Struggle for Southern Africa, 1976–1991. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2013.
  • 5
    Nelson Mandela. Speech Recognizing Cuba’s Role at Cuito Cuanavale. Havana, July 26, 1991. In How Far We Slaves Have Come, by Nelson Mandela and Fidel Castro. New York: Pathfinder Press, 1992.
  • 6
    See note 3
  • 7
    Edward George. The Cuban Intervention in Angola, 1965–1991: From Che Guevara to Cuito Cuanavale. London: Routledge, 2004.
  • 8
    “Battle of Cuito Cuanavale.” South African History Online.
  • 9
    Vijay Prashad. “Cuba’s Role in Angola Changed the Course of African History.” Jacobin, March 19, 2021.
  • 10
    Cuban Intervention in Angola.” Wikipedia. Last updated 2025.
Sammy Attoh is a Human Rights Coordinator, poet, and public writer. A member of The Riverside Church in New York City and The New York State Chaplains Group, he advocates for spiritual renewal and systemic justice. Originally from Ghana, his work draws from ancestral wisdom to explore the sacred ties between people, planet, and posterity. Read other articles by Sammy.