Tuesday, December 02, 2025

 

Are primary students prepared to write in a digital world?



A nation-wide study on computer-based writing instruction in Australian classrooms has shined a spotlight on how little time and attention primary schools are giving to teaching students how to write using a computer.




Edith Cowan University





2 December 2025


Lead author Dr Anabela Malpique from the School of Education at ECU said the research surveyed 340 primary education teachers (Years 1–6) from across Australia about the computer-based writing instruction provided in their classrooms.

Instructional time

“While results showed that teachers found it was important to teach computer-based writing skills, most respondents reported allocating less than one hour per week on computer-based writing practice in their classrooms,” Dr Malpique explained.

Instead, teachers spent significantly more time teaching paper-based writing, with teaching keyboarding receiving the least instructional time – approximately nine minutes per week.

“The findings show that more than 96 per cent of teachers believed that students’ keyboarding skills contributed to their performance when completing national online exams – like NAPLAN and other assessments.”

Teaching in preparation for a digital world

With most primary teachers having little time set aside to teach keyboarding and word processing skills, few reported having knowledge of teaching strategies for students to learn how to plan and revise computer-generated texts. Instead, teachers tend to focus more on spelling.

“In the digital age, skillful computer-based writing is essential for school aged children since it empowers them to communicate, acquire knowledge, critically engage with information, and produce text-based original thoughts,” Dr Malpique said.

Research suggests students should be taught typing and word processing skills as soon as they are introduced to computers.

“It is difficult to correct children as they get older if they are not adequately taught the foundations of computer-based writing, including keyboarding skills such as key locations and hand and finger positions,” Dr Malpique explained.

“Instead, we should be empowering children in the early primary school years to better understand how computers work, and to write proficiently using a computer, particularly as we enter the age of artificial intelligence.”

Perceived importance vs practice, access and ability

The majority of teachers surveyed (more than 98 per cent) agreed it was important to teach keyboarding and word-processing skills for writing, and that students should be able to type as fast as they can write by hand when completing Year 5.

Many teachers (40 per cent) also shared that keyboarding instruction should be administered by specialised lab teachers, librarians or media specialists in Years 1 – 3. Around 30 per cent said the responsibility should sit with the classroom teacher.

“Findings from our research suggest that students may have limited typing and computer-based word processing skills due to lack of access to a computer, laptop or portable device with an external keyboard, both within their school environment and in the home,” Dr Malpique said.

“It is very difficult to develop computer navigation and typing skills and write longer texts with only an iPad.”

Only 17.4 per cent of teachers stated that their students had access to a computer device with an external keyboard at school and 69.4 per cent reported that students had access to a digital device within the classroom with only an on-screen keyboard – like an iPad or tablet.

The challenge for teachers is the task of ensuring children in their classroom have the opportunity to learn how to effectively write using a computer, as well as by hand.

Teacher preparation and confidence

Findings from this national study suggest that, although teachers understand the importance and are motivated to teach computer-based writing in a digital world, they don’t feel as prepared as they could be.

“Most respondents described not having received formal training to teach computer-based writing and that they felt little confidence to teach students how to create texts using digital devices,” Dr Malpique said.

“Teachers reported feeling they lacked the preparation and confidence to teach computer-based writing skills, which explains their instructional practices and the minimal time dedicated to teaching children how to type and write texts using a computer.”

Supporting teaching and learning of digital skills

Dr Malpique highlighted the importance of providing more resourcing of technology in schools to bridge the equity divide, considering future careers will require students to have adequate digital skills.

“We also need to support the teaching and learning of digital writing in primary schools through increased ongoing professional learning for teachers and by integrating foundational computer-based writing skills into regular classroom activities.”

Teaching computer-based writing: primary teachers’ preparation, self-efficacy, and instructional practices is included in the Writing for All: Handwriting and keyboarding skills in the Early Years project funded by The Ian Potter Foundation.

- ends -   

     

Media contact:

Hayley Butler, (08) 6304 5575, h.butler@ecu.edu.au

or
ECU Corporate Relations, (08) 6304 2222, 
pr@ecu.edu.au

Sign up to get the latest research news and media releases delivered to your inbox.

 

New archaeological study challenges the paleo diet, revealing humans have always eaten processed plant foods



University of Toronto





Humans evolved over hundreds of thousands of years to be the ultimate flexible eaters – chasing carbohydrates and fats from plant and animal sources alike. A new study in the Journal of Archaeological Research by researchers at the Australian National University and the University of Toronto Mississauga reveals early humans were far from the Palaeolithic meat-eaters sometimes portrayed, but rather relied heavily on a wide range of plant and animal foods. 

“We often discuss plant use as if it only became important with the advent of agriculture,” said Dr. Anna Florin, co-author of The Broad Spectrum Species: Plant Use and Processing as Deep Time Adaptations. “However, new archaeological discoveries from around the world are telling us our ancestors were grinding wild seeds, pounding and cooking starchy tubers, and detoxifying bitter nuts many thousands of years before this.”  

The research highlights that humans are a “broad-spectrum species,” and our ability to use diverse plant resources has shaped our evolutionary trajectory.  

 “This ability to process plant foods allowed us to unlock key calories and nutrients, and to move into, and thrive in, a range of environments globally,” added Dr. Monica Ramsey, the other co-author of this study, emphasizing the importance of “processed plant foods” to early human diets. 

“Our species evolved as plant-loving, tool-using foodies who could turn almost anything into dinner,” said Ramsey. 

 

Rising heat leads to minimal losses for California processing tomatoes


Researchers analyzed traffic, temperatures and 1.4 million tomato truckloads



University of California - Davis

Tomato trucks leave the field 

image: 

Tomato trucks leave a field after harvest in Firebaugh, California.

view more 

Credit: Hector Amezcua/UC Davis





California’s $1 billion processing tomato industry is highly efficient and likely will be able to withstand higher temperatures and traffic congestion with minimal postharvest losses, according to research conducted at the University of California, Davis.

The research, published in the American Journal of Agricultural Economics, analyzed 1.4 million truckloads of tomatoes transported from thousands of farm fields to processing facilities between 2011 and 2020.

“It’s rare that we find an example where climate change is expected to have a negligible effect,” said Sarah Whitnell, who led the research as a postdoctoral scholar at UC Davis and is now at University of Western Australia, Perth. “Ultimately, the supply chain is a well-oiled machine. The losses are relatively small, and while temperature does increase them, it’s not by a huge amount.”

Researchers matched each truckload to California state highway traffic data and hourly temperatures, which ranged from 48 degrees to 108 degrees Fahrenheit. They compared truckloads of tomatoes from the same field and same growing season: for example, one travelling at 5 a.m. when temperatures are cooler and traffic is light with one travelling at 5 p.m. when the opposite is true.

Optimal conditions: Cool weather and traffic

The best-case scenario was when cool temperatures coincided with heavy traffic. The worst-case scenario was hot temperatures combined with heavy traffic. When it’s hot, slow traffic speeds cause trucks to spend more time at damaging temperatures.

“If you have this magic scenario where temperatures are cool but there is traffic, you actually have the lowest losses,” Whitnall said. “This is because faster speeds cause vibrations that can increase damage in fresh produce.”

Comparing best- and worst-case scenarios, the share of soft, split or squished tomatoes doubles from about 1% to 2%. This equates to modest losses, the researchers also found.

The findings show that California’s processing tomato industry is highly efficient and could be a model for others, said senior author Tim Beatty, who is chair of the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at UC Davis.

“Most supply chains aren’t nearly as efficient as the California supply chain, so what this says is if you’re a very efficient supply chain, you can mitigate the losses associated with climate change,” Beatty said. “It says that adaptation is possible to really reduce loss past the farm gate.”

Industry relationships made research possible

Eighty-four cents of every farm dollar is generated after the product leaves a farm, but most climate change research has focused on how growing is affected. This research looks at that second stage and was possible because of comprehensive public data and detailed transport, tonnage and quality data supplied by industry, Beatty said.

“We know very little about the effects of climate change once product leaves the farm gate,” he said. “I think this paper is one of the very first to actually tackle that.”

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Agriculture and Food Research Initiative supported this research.

 

 

In support of the National Institute of Nursing Research





University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing

Penn Nursing's Mary Naylor, Connie Ulrich & Martha Curley 

image: 

(l) Mary Naylor, PhD; (c) Connie Ulrich, PhD, & (r) Martha A.Q. Curley, PhD

view more 

Credit: Penn Nursing's NewCourtland Center for Health and Transitions




PHILADELPHIA (December 2, 2025) – In an editorial published in JAMA Health Forum, three prominent nursing researchers have strongly defended the necessity of the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) and its enduring impact on public health. Titled "The Enduring Impact of the National Institute of Nursing Research and Why We Still Need It," the viewpoint addresses the Institute's future as it approaches its 40th anniversary.

The authors – Mary D. Naylor, PhD, RN, FAAN, the Marian S. Ware Professor in Gerontology in the Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences and Director of the NewCourtland Center for Transitions and HealthMartha A.Q. Curley, PhD, RN, FAAN, Professor of in the Department of Family and Community Health, and the Ruth M. Colket Endowed Chair in Pediatric Nursing at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia; and  Connie M. Ulrich, PhD, RN, FAAN, the Lillian S. Brunner Chair in Medical and Surgical Nursing in the Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences and Professor of Medical Ethics and Health Policy in the Perelman School of Medicine -- note the critical tension between the current administration’s proposal to eliminate the NINR in its 2026 fiscal year budget and the votes by House and Senate Appropriations Committees to maintain its current funding.

Naylor, Curley, and Ulrich argue that the need for the NINR’s distinctive research strengths is greater now than ever before. They point to the Institute’s unique approach, which includes a life course perspective that promotes health across the entire lifespan. Ultimately, they conclude that science grounded in the core of nursing—which considers the whole person and their caregivers, engages the patient and family in care, and promotes people's strengths—must remain a federal funding priority.

# # #

About the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing

The University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing (Penn Nursing) is one of the world’s leading nursing schools. It has been ranked the #1 nursing school in the U.S. by QS University for a decade. Our Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) is among the top-ranked programs in the nation, according to the 2026 U.S. News & World Report’s Best Colleges rankings. Penn Nursing also consistently earns high rankings in U.S. News & World Report’s annual list of best graduate schools and is a top recipient of National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for nursing research. Penn Nursing prepares nurse scientists and nurse leaders to meet the health needs of a global society through innovation in research, education, and practice. Follow Penn Nursing on: FacebookLinkedInYouTube, & Instagram.