Friday, February 27, 2026

‘You aren’t trapped’: Nurses are choosing Canada over Trump’s America


Surgical nurse Natasha McClinton in April 2020, Wikimedia Common

February 26, 2026

Last month, Justin and Amy Miller packed their vehicles with three kids, two dogs, a pet bearded dragon, and whatever belongings they could fit, then drove 2,000 miles from Wisconsin to British Columbia to leave President Donald Trump’s America.

The Millers resettled on Vancouver Island, their scenic refuge accessible only by ferry or plane. Justin went to work in the emergency room at Nanaimo Regional General Hospital, where he became one of at least 20 U.S.-trained nurses hired since April.

Fear of Trump, some of the nurses said, was why they left.

“There are so many like-minded people out there,” said Justin, who now works elbow to elbow with Americans in Canada. “You aren’t trapped. You don’t have to stay. Health care workers are welcomed with open arms around the world.”

The Millers are part of a new surge of American nurses, doctors, and other health care workers moving to Canada, and specifically British Columbia, where more than 1,000 U.S.-trained nurses have been approved to work since April. As the Trump administration enacts increasingly authoritarian policies and decimates funding for public health, insurance, and medical research, many nurses have felt the draw of Canada’s progressive politics, friendly reputation, and universal health care system.

Additionally, some nurses were incensed last year when the Trump administration said it would reclassify nursing as a nonprofessional degree, which would impose strict federal limits on the loans nursing students could receive.

Canada is poised to capitalize. Two of its most populous provinces, Ontario and British Columbia, have streamlined the licensing process for American nurses since Trump returned to the White House. British Columbia also launched a $5 million advertising campaign last year to recruit nurses from California, Oregon, and Washington state.

“With the chaos and uncertainty happening in the U.S., we are seizing the opportunity to attract the talent we need,” Josie Osborne, the province’s health minister, said in a statement announcing the campaign.


Fears Realized

Amy Miller, a nurse practitioner, said she and her husband were determined to move their children out of the country because they felt Trump’s second term would inevitably spiral into violence.

First, the Millers got nursing licenses in New Zealand, but when the job search took too long, they pivoted to Canada.

Justin was offered a job within weeks.

Amy found one within three months.

So they moved. And just a few days later, the Millers watched with horror from afar as their fears came true.

As federal immigration forces clashed with protesters in Minneapolis on Jan. 24, federal agents fatally shot an ICU nurse, Alex Pretti, as he filmed a confrontation and appeared to be trying to shield a woman who was knocked down. Video of the killing showed border agents pinning Pretti to the ground before seizing his concealed, licensed handgun and opening fire on him.


The Trump administration quickly called Pretti a “domestic terrorist” who intended to kill federal agents. That allegation was disputed by eyewitness videos that circulated on social media and spurred widespread outrage, including from nurses and nursing organizations, some of whom invoked the profession’s duty to care for the vulnerable.

“I don’t want to say it was expected, but that’s why we are here,” Amy Miller said. “Even our oldest kid, she was like: ‘It’s OK, Mom, because we are not there anymore. We are safe here.’ So she recognizes that, and she’s not even in middle school yet.”

Both the U.S. and Canada have a severe need for nurses. The U.S. is projected to be short about 270,000 registered nurses, plus at least 120,000 licensed practical nurses, by 2028, according to recent estimates from the Health Resources and Services Administration. In Canada, nursing job vacancies tripled from 2018 to 2023, when they reached nearly 42,000, according to a recent report from the Montreal Economic Institute, a Canadian think tank.

When asked to comment, the White House noted that industry data shows the number of nurses licensed in the U.S. increased in 2025. It dismissed accounts of nurses moving to Canada as “anecdotes of individuals with severe cases of Trump derangement syndrome.”


“The American health care workforce is the finest in the world, and it continues to expand under President Trump,” White House spokesperson Kush Desai said. “Employment opportunities in the American health care system remain robust, with career advancement and pay that far exceed that of other developed nations.”

‘A Sense of Relief’

It is unknown precisely how many American nurses have moved north since Trump returned to office, because some Canadian provinces do not track or release such statistics.

British Columbia, which has done the most to recruit Americans, approved the licensing applications of 1,028 U.S.-trained nurses from when the province’s streamlined application process took effect in April 2025 through January, according to the British Columbia College of Nurses and Midwives. In all of 2023, only 112 applicants from the U.S. were approved, the agency said. In 2024, it was 127.


Increased interest from American nurses was also confirmed by nursing associations in Ontario and Alberta, as well as by the nationwide Canadian Nurses Association.

Angela Wignall, CEO of Nurses and Nurse Practitioners of British Columbia, said American nurses used to move north because they had fallen in love with Canada (or a Canadian). But more recently, she said, she had met nurses who feared the White House would spur violence and vigilantism, particularly against families that included same-sex couples.

“Some of them were living in fear of the administration, and they shared a sense of relief when crossing the border,” Wignall said. “As a Canadian, it’s heartbreaking. And also a joy to welcome them.”

Vancouver Island, which has a population of about 860,000, has gained 64 U.S.-trained nurses since April, including those at Nanaimo Regional, said Andrew Leyne, a spokesperson for the island’s health agency.

One of the nurses was Susan Fleishman, a Canadian who moved to the U.S. as a child, then worked for 23 years in American emergency rooms before leaving the country in November.

Fleishman said hateful rhetoric from Trump has fueled an angry division that has permeated and soured American life.

“It wasn’t an easy move — that’s for sure. But I think it’s definitely worth it,” she said, happily back in Canada. “I find there is a lot more kindness here. And I think that will keep me here.”

Brandy Frye, who also worked for decades in American ERs, said she moved to Vancouver Island last year after waiting to see whether Mark Carney would become Canada’s prime minister. Carney’s rise was widely viewed as a rejection of Trumpism.

Meanwhile, Frye said, the California hospital where she worked had been stripping words associated with diversity and equity out of its paperwork to appease the Trump administration. She couldn’t stand it.

“It felt like a step against everything I believe in,” Frye said. “And I didn’t feel like I belonged there anymore.”

Like many of the American nurses who have moved to Vancouver Island, Frye was first wooed to the area by a viral video that was meant to attract tourist dollars but ended up doing much more.

About a year ago, Tod Maffin, a social media content creator and former CBC Radio host, invited Americans to the port city of Nanaimo for a weekend event designed to offset the impact of Trump’s tariffs on the local economy.

Maffin said about 350 people attended the April event.

“A lot of them were health care workers looking for an escape route,” Maffin said. “They were there to help support our economy but also to look into Canada.”

Maffin saw an opportunity. He repurposed the event website into a recruiting tool and launched a Discord chatroom to help Americans relocate.

Maffin said he believes the campaign helped about 35 health care workers move to Vancouver Island. Volunteers in more than 30 other Canadian communities have since duplicated his website in an effort to attract their own American nurses and doctors.

“There are communities across Canada where the emergency room closes at night because one nurse is out. That’s how thin staffing is,” Maffin said.

“One new nurse in a small town, or in a midsized city like Nanaimo,” he said, “makes a difference.”

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

.
DEFUND ICE

‘Heavily Armed Secret Police Force’: ICE, CBP amass $144 Million Weapons Stockpile

“In just one year, ICE’s spending commitments on weapons, ammunition, and accessories surged fourfold.”



A US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent directs observers after they arrested people from a residence on January 13, 2026 in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
(Photo by Stephen Maturen/Getty Images)

Brad Reed
Feb 25, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

A report produced by the office of Sen. Adam Schiff reveals that federal immigration enforcement agencies amassed a gigantic weapons stockpile during the first year of President Donald Trump’s second term.

In total, the report released by Schiff (D-Calif.) finds that US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) committed to spending over $144 million on weapons and ammunition over the last year, a massive increase over these agencies’ spending on weapons in years past.

“In just one year, ICE’s spending commitments on weapons, ammunition, and accessories surged fourfold—an increase of over 360 percent—when compared to ICE’s contracts in 2024,” states the report. “In 2025, CBP’s contracts for weapons, ammunition, and accessories doubled when compared to CBP’s 2024 contract totals.”

The report documents how both agencies have combined to spend tens of millions of dollars purchasing lethal weapons, including “AR-style rifles, pistols, and large quantities of accessories, such as optical sights for firearms and suppressors”; so-called “less-lethal” weapons including “TASERs, pepper sprays, tear gas canisters, and canister launchers”; and assorted kinds of ammunition.

The report adds that “records show that DHS’s procurement of weapons at immense scale is just beginning, as these contract awards contemplate even greater spending moving forward,” which it says should serve “as a stark warning to the American public.”

Schiff’s report concludes with a warning about the US Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) “growing plans to build a heavily-armed domestic police force,” adding that federal immigration agents’ killings of Minneapolis residents Renee Good and Alex Pretti could only be the first of many tragedies to come.

In an analysis of the Schiff report published Wednesday, the New Republic’s Greg Sargent argued that the Trump administration is trying to launch a domestic “war on terrorism” by bringing the kind of violence the US has deployed overseas back to the homeland.

“In a sense, we’re seeing yet more cancerous growth of the post-September 11 national security bureaucracy, but with a more intensified inward focus,” wrote Sargent, who described ICE and CBP under Trump as a “heavily armed secret police force” in a Wednesday social media post.

Georgetown University law professor Rosa Brooks told Sargent that the dangers posed by ICE and CBP could outlast Trump’s presidency.

“Trump is building up a well-funded, poorly trained paramilitary force that could easily take on a life of its own,” Brooks explained. “Once you have a massive moneymaking machine ginned up, it’s hard to reverse course and turn off the spigot.”
Watched by Millions, ‘People’s State of the Union’ Counters Unhinged Trump

“We live in a country where we have one reality for everyday people and another for the rich and the well-connected and the well-protected,” said Rep. Summer Lee.


MoveOn executive director Katie Bethell speaks at the People’s State of the Union rally and boycott on the National Mall on February 24, 2026 in Washington, DC.
(Photo by Jemal Countess/Getty Images for MoveOn)

Jake Johnson
Feb 25, 2026
COMMON DREAMS


As President Donald Trump prepared to deliver his State of the Union address on Tuesday to applause from sycophantic Republicans, dozens of Democratic lawmakers, progressive advocates, and people impacted by White House policies gathered on the National Mall to present an alternative assessment of the country’s trajectory.

“We live in a country where we have one reality for everyday people and another for the rich and the well-connected and the well-protected,” said Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.), preempting Trump’s claim of a “golden age of America” despite rising costs, deepening inequality, and staggering corruption.

While many Democratic lawmakers opted to attend Trump’s speech, saying they did not want the president to deliver his remarks to a House of Representatives full of Republicans, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) told the crowd gathered blocks from the US Capitol that “these are not normal times, and Democrats have to stop behaving normally.”

Watch the full counter-rally, which organizers said millions watched online:



Among those who joined Democratic lawmakers at the People’s State of the Union were Epstein survivors and people harmed by the Trump administration’s lawless assault on immigrants, assault on the social safety net, and other policies.

Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said during his remarks at Tuesday’s rally that “I’m not in the Capitol building tonight because I have a pretty good idea of what’s going to happen.”

“For an hour or two or three or four, a man who’s made $4 billion off of being president is going to lecture you, the American people, about how good you have it,” said Casar. “A man who is building himself a golden ballroom is going to tell you that if you’re struggling to get by, that’s your fault, because he’s killing it.”

“Everyone but Donald Trump’s rich friends knows that it’s a disaster,” Casar added.
Ocean Warming Drives ‘Deeply Concerning Loss of Marine Life,’ Study Shows

Noting that species are at risk from not only warming waters but also overfishing, one expert argued that “any management reform must simultaneously address both drivers of change.”


A diver hunts thunnus in Mediterranean Sea near Izmir, Turkey on November 19, 2024.
(Photo by Mahmut Serdar Alakus/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Jessica Corbett
Feb 25, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Humanity’s continued reliance on fossil fuels led to last year being among the hottest on record, and oceans store over 90% of the excess heat from greenhouse gases. A study out Wednesday details how the related long-term heating, warm years, and marine heatwaves “pose serious but poorly quantified threats” to fish species.

“To put it simply, the faster the ocean floor warms, the faster we lose fish,” lead author Shahar Chaikin of Spain’s National Museum of Natural Sciences (MNCN) told the Guardian. “A 7.2% decline for every tenth of a degree per decade might sound small... But compounded over time, across entire ocean basins, it represents a staggering and deeply concerning loss of marine life.”

For the study, published in the journal Nature Ecology & Evolution, Chaikin, his MNCN colleague Miguel B. Araújo and the National University of Colombia’s Juan David González-Trujillo analyzed 702,037 estimates of biomass change for 33,990 populations of 1,566 fish species across the Mediterranean, north Atlantic, and northeast Pacific between 1993 and 2021.

“On shorter timescales, warmer years and marine heatwaves were linked to sharp biomass losses of up to 43.4% in populations at the warm edge of the species’ range and biomass increases of up to 176% at the cold edge,” the study states. Chaikin warned in a statement that the temporary jumps in cooler areas could send misleading signals to managers of fisheries.

“Although this sudden increase in biomass in cold waters may seem like good news for fisheries, these are transient increases,” he explained. “If managers raise catch quotas based on biomass increases caused by a heatwave, they risk causing the collapse of populations when temperatures return to normal or when the effect of long-term warming prevails, because these are short-lived increases.”

González-Trujillo stressed that “unlike extreme short-term weather fluctuations, which can vary dramatically, this chronic warming exerts a constant negative pressure on fish populations in the Mediterranean Sea, the north Atlantic Ocean, and the northeastern Pacific Ocean.”

Specifically, Chaikin said that “when we remove the noise of extreme short-term weather events, the data show that this warming is associated with a sustained annual decline in biomass of up to 19.8%.”



Given the findings, Araújo emphasized that fisheries’ managers “must balance localized increases with long-term declines extremely carefully to avoid overexploitation.”

“As ocean warming continues, the only viable strategy is to prioritize long-term resilience,” the study co-author said. “Management measures must plan for the biomass decline expected in an increasingly warm ocean.”

Carlos García-Soto is a scientist at the Spanish National Research Council, which manages MNCN. Although not a study co-author, he also highlighted the need for policymakers to understand the “clear risk of misinterpretation” detailed in the new paper.

“In a context of accelerated climate change, policies cannot react solely to extreme events or be based on short-term signals,” García-Soto said in a statement. “They need consistency between science, planning, and governance, especially in shared ecosystems or on the high seas.”

Also responding to the research on Wednesday, Guillermo Ortuño Crespo of the International Union for Conservation of Nature said that “I believe this is a methodologically sound and valuable study that provides valuable evidence on how different components of ocean warming affect fish biomass.”

While recognizing the well-documented and devastating impacts of fossil fuel-driven heating on marine species, Ortuño Crespo also warned that “there is a risk, in my opinion, that climate change will become the main explanation for changes in marine species biomass, leaving aside overfishing.”

“Historically, overfishing has been the main determinant of biomass declines in many fisheries around the world,” he noted, citing the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization. “The proportion of overexploited stocks globally continues to increase, indicating that fishing pressure remains a dominant risk factor. The current challenge is that this overfishing crisis is being further exacerbated by ocean warming and deoxygenation.”

“In terms of public policy, the study is highly relevant because it emphasizes that fisheries management systems must become more climate-adaptive,” Ortuño Crespo said. “Any management reform must simultaneously address both drivers of change: climate and fisheries. Adjusting quotas solely on the basis of climate without reducing overcapacity and the impact of high-impact gear, such as bottom trawling, is likely to be insufficient to recover stocks.”

 

Pakistan declares 'open war' with Afghanistan and launches strikes on Kabul

Local residents and civil defense workers look on as a bulldozer clears the rubble of a house hit by a cross-border Pakistani army strike, Afghanistan, Sunday, Feb. 22, 2026.
Copyright AP Photo/Hedayat Shah

By Emma De Ruiter
Published on 

Pakistan's latest operation came after Afghan Taliban forces attacked Pakistani border troops on Thursday night over earlier air strikes by Islamabad, and follows months of border clashes.

Pakistan launched strikes on major cities in Afghanistan on Friday, including the capital Kabul, as its defence minister said his country ran out of “patience” and considers that there is now an “open war”.

It comes after Afghan Taliban forces attacked Pakistani border troops on Thursday night in retaliation for deadly Pakistani airstrikes on Afghan border areas on Sunday.

In a post on X Friday, Defence Minister Khawaja Mohammad Asif said Pakistan had hoped for peace in Afghanistan after the withdrawal of NATO forces and expected the Taliban to focus on the welfare of the Afghan people and regional stability.

Instead, he said, the Taliban had turned Afghanistan “into a colony of India,” gathered militants from around the world and begun “exporting terrorism.”

Pakistan has frequently accused neighbouring India of backing the outlawed Baloch Liberation Army and the Pakistani Taliban, allegations New Delhi denies.

Relations between the neighbours have plunged in recent months, with land border crossings largely shut since deadly fighting in October that killed more than 70 people on both sides.

Islamabad accuses Afghanistan of failing to act against militant groups that carry out attacks in Pakistan, which the Taliban government denies.

Several rounds of negotiations followed an initial ceasefire brokered by Qatar and Turkey, but the efforts have failed to produce a lasting agreement.

Both militaries said they killed dozens of soldiers in the latest round of border violence, which followed multiple Pakistani strikes on Afghanistan and clashes along the frontier in recent months.

Months of border violence

There has been a series of deadly suicide blasts in Pakistan and Afghanistan in recent months.

They included an attack on a Shiite mosque in Islamabad that killed at least 40 people and was claimed by the so-called Islamic State terrorist group.

The group's regional chapter, Islamic State-Khorasan, also claimed a deadly suicide bombing at a restaurant in Kabul last month.

After repeated breaches of the initial ceasefire, Saudi Arabia intervened this month, mediating the release of three Pakistani soldiers captured by Afghanistan in October.

Pakistan launched a sweeping crackdown in October 2023 to expel migrants without documents, urging those in the country to leave of their own accord to avoid arrest and forcible deportation, and forcibly expelling others. Iran also began a crackdown on migrants at around the same time.

Since then, millions have streamed across the border into Afghanistan, including people who were born in Pakistan decades ago and had built lives and created businesses there.

Last year alone, 2.9 million people returned to Afghanistan, the UN refugee agency has said, with nearly 80,000 having returned so far this year.



Hundreds Reportedly Killed as ‘Open War’


Breaks Out Between Pakistan and


Afghanistan

A spokesperson for the head of the United Nations implored both sides to “seek to resolve any differences through diplomacy.”



A Taliban security personnel operating an anti-aircraft gun keeps watch for Pakistani airstrikes near the Torkham border crossing between Afghanistan and Pakistan in the Nangarhar province on February 27, 2026.
(Photo by Aimal Zahir/AFP via Getty Images)



Common Dreams Staff
Feb 27, 2026

This is a developing story... Please check back for updates...

Pakistan’s defense minister said Friday that his country and Afghanistan are in an “open war” after Afghan forces attacked Pakistani border troops in what Kabul characterized as retaliation for recent airstrikes.

Pakistan, which has nuclear weapons, responded to the attack on its border troops with airstrikes on at least three Afghan provinces early Friday, reportedly killing more than 220 people. A spokesperson for Afghanistan’s Taliban government said its forces killed dozens of Pakistanis in Thursday’s onslaught.

Al Jazeera‘s Kamal Hyder, reporting from Pakistan on Friday, said that “we were able to see and hear outgoing fire from the Pakistani side that appears to be heavy artillery, which means that the clashes are still continuing.”

Stéphane Dujarric, a spokesperson for United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres, said the UN chief is alarmed by the escalating hostilities and urged the “parties to continue to seek to resolve any differences through diplomacy.”

‘Disgraceful Act of Complicity’: Indian Left Denounces Modi’s Israel Visit

“Modi’s embrace of Zionist Israel amidst its relentless genocidal assault on Palestine is a betrayal of India’s anti-colonial legacy,” said one leftist leader.



Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his wife Sara Netanyahu greet Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at Ben Gurion International Airport near Los, Israel on February 25, 2026.
(Photo by Indian Prime Minister’s Office)


Brett Wilkins
Feb 25, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s arrival in Israel on Wednesday sparked widespread condemnation among his country’s leftists, many of whom accused the Hindu nationalist leader of complicity in Israel’s annihilation of Gaza.

Modi was warmly welcomed at Ben-Gurion International Airport by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his wife Sara to kick off a two-day state visit that is expected to focus on issues including military cooperation and arms sales, as Indian purchases of Israeli weaponry have increased exponentially in recent years.

The Indian leader was also joyously greeted at his place of accommodation, the King David Hotel, where in 1946 Jewish militants seeking independence from British occupation carried out a bombing that killed 91 people, including at least 15 Jews.



Modi addressed the Israeli Knesset, or Parliament, lamenting the Hamas-led attack of October 7, 2023 in which 1,195 Israelis and others were killed and 251 abducted. But he said nothing about the more than 250,000 Palestinians killed or wounded by Israel’s genocidal retaliation.

He did say that “no cause can justify the murder of civilians.” But he was talking about Israeli, not Palestinian, civilians.

“Modi endorsed the brutal killing of 71,000 innocent Palestinians from reckless Israeli bombing,” Calcutta-based journalist Seema Sengupta said on social media in response to the Knesset speech. “The death on both sides should’ve been mourned by him. Instead, he sounded like a partisan leader of a party which gained prominence through disharmony, violence, and bloodshed.”

The Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M)—which leads the ruling Left Democratic Front that currently heads the Kerala state government—said it “strongly opposes” Modi’s visit, which it called “a betrayal of the Palestinian cause” that “legitimizes the murderous Netanyahu regime.”

“The visit comes at a juncture when Israel has been waging a genocidal war in Gaza,” the party continued. “Despite a ceasefire, there are daily violations by Israel which conducts strikes killing scores of Palestinians. In the occupied West Bank, there are stepped up attacks on Palestinians and a spurt in illegal settlements.”

“The declared intent of the visit is also to deepen strategic, military, and economic ties with a Zionist expansionist regime which seeks to dominate the region with the help of the United States,” CPI-M added. “The visit is all the more inopportune because it is taking place at a time when the United States is preparing to attack Iran militarily at the instigation of Israel.”

CPI-M General Secretary M A Baby said that “Modi’s embrace of Zionist Israel amidst its relentless genocidal assault on Palestine is a betrayal of India’s anti-colonial legacy.”

The Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) Liberation, whose stronghold is in the eastern state of Bihar, said that it “condemns Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Israel as a disgraceful act of complicity in the ongoing genocidal assault on the Palestinian people.”

“At a time when Palestinian civilians are being massacred, displaced, and starved under a brutal Israeli occupation, this visit amounts to political endorsement and profiteering on Palestinian blood,” CPI (ML) Liberation continued. “After mortgaging India’s sovereignty and strategic autonomy to [US President Donald] Trump’s racist agenda, Modi is now completely surrendering India’s historic legacy of anti-colonialism and solidarity with the oppressed by visiting Israel.”

“Since assuming office in 2014, the Modi regime has systematically imported Israeli models of repression to consolidate its own politics of hate at home,” the party added. “From bulldozer demolitions and collective punishment tactics against minorities and marginalized, to the expansion of illegal surveillance infrastructures, the [Bharatiya Janata Party]'s fascist politics has found a role model in Israel.”

Israel and India have deepened ties since Modi and the BJP were elected over a decade ago. Both Modi and Netanyahu are right-wing nationalists who utilize religious supremacism to exclude or marginalize Muslims, and both have been accused of increasing authoritarianism, just like their common ally Trump.

Center-leftists including members of the opposition Indian National Congress—which has been criticized for its “pragmatic” engagement with Israel—also condemned Modi’s visit.


Left-leaning members of Indian civil society and academia also decried the visit.

Rebuffing Modi’s claim that this week’s shirtless anti-BJP demonstrations by members of the Indian Youth Congress were an embarrassment for the nation, Delhi School of Economics professor Nandini Sundar said on social media that visiting “genocide-committing Israel has embarrassed and shamed Indians more than a 1,000 shirtless protests.”

The activist group Indian People in Solidarity With Palestine and the India chapter of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement issued a joint statement accusing the “fascist BJP government” of working “hands-in-gloves with genocidal Israel” to “suppress voices of dissent while maintaining a facade of being democratic.”

Members of Indian People in Solidarity With Palestine and the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement demonstrate against Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to India.

 (Photo by Indian People in Solidarity With Palestine)

“At a time when the ceasefire is being used as an excuse to bomb and vaporize Palestinians and occupy Gaza,” the groups said, “the Indian government is choosing to stand with genocidal Israel and its imperialist masters like America and is working overtime to benefit the corporations from the occupation of Palestine.”

Update: This article has been updated with additional remarks from Modi.

India’s Modi addresses Israeli Parliament, deal negotiations ongoing

India’s Modi addresses Israeli Parliament, deal negotiations ongoing
PM Modi in Israel / Narendra Modi - PM of India - X
By bno Chennai Office February 26, 2026

On the first day of his two day visit to Israel Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the Israeli parliament, the Knesset in Jerusalem, according to a report by All India Radio.

During the address Modi condoled the loss of life and terrorism perpetrated by the terrorist group Hamas on October 7 2023 in Israel. He drew parallels to India’s own experience of being attacked by terrorists during the November 26 2008 attacks in Mumbai which led to the death of 160 people including civilians, law enforcement and security forces and armed forces personnel.

Some of the civilians killed during the Mumbai attack were also Jewish and Israeli nationals. India subsequently established that the Mumbai attacks were perpetrated by terrorist groups backed, funded and operationally overseen by Pakistan’s military and intelligence agencies.

Modi also revealed that his exact day of birth coincided with the day India officially recognised the state of Israel on September 17 1950.

According to a report by The Times of India, Modi was also honoured with the Speaker of the Knesset Medal and became its first awardee.

Preceding the address to the Israeli parliament the Indian leader was received at the airport by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his spouse. Modi also had a meeting and conversation with Netanyahu and later visited a technology and innovation exhibition with him, with both Israeli and Indian products featured.

The visit to the exhibition included visuals of Modi and Netanyahu posing with a Royal Enfield Motorcycle - the product of a world recognised Indian motorcycle brand Eicher Motors (NSE: EICHERMOT).

While Modi has been in Israel, a delegation of Israeli officials is purportedly negotiating the specifics of a Free Trade Agreement with the Indian side in New Delhi, in parallel according to another report by All India Radio.

An agreement will be a headline maker when confirmed, and may sit beside a list of agreements and memoranda signed between Tel Aviv and New Delhi as Modi’s visit concludes. Defence is also a major pillar of the visit and diplomatic engagement that is underway between India and Israel.

While specific and confirmed cues are not forthcoming from either the Israeli defence establishment or its Indian counterpart. It is likely that India is seeking components for its future nationwide air defence shield dubbed the “Sudarshan Chakra” programme which is conceived to be a multi stage and multi layer system with several components of different origin, range and role.

Possible acquisitions could include jointly developed versions of air defence and precision strike weapons and platforms such as ballistic missile interception capable air defence systems IAI industries’s Arrow and Rafael Advanced Defense Systems’s David’s Sling and shorter ranged Elbit systems’s (TASE:ESLT, NASDAQ:ESLT) Iron Dome and Iron Beam.

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles(UAV)s may also be explored as Israel and IAI industries has been a traditional vendor to India’s military for UAVs which India has successfully used in combat operations. However none of these deals or likelihood of these systems being under discussion has been referred to by any official sources.

Be it coincidental or by design, India has also been negotiating an FTA with the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) which can be seen as a hedge strategy for the broader West Asia region in India’s complex foreign policy web.

India has always taken a neutral stance on the Arab-Israeli conflict and has advocated for a peaceful resolution of all conflicts in the region through dialogue and diplomacy as it has strategic ties to both Israel and Arab states that affect its own national interest directly across defence, food, mobility, diaspora and energy security.

India and Israel sign new pacts but FTA negotiations to continue

India and Israel sign new pacts but FTA negotiations to continue
/ Narendra Modi - PM of India - X
By bno Chennai Office February 26, 2026

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi ended the second and final of his state visit to Israel on February 26, 2026, according to a report by All India Radio.

During his visit a delegation of Israeli officials was in New Delhi negotiating a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) in parallel with their Indian counterparts headed by India’s Minister of Commerce and Industry Piyush Goyal.

The round of FTA negotiations were positive but didn’t conclude with the agreement as was widely expected, and instead a second round of negotiations has been scheduled for May 2026. It is unclear what issues or obstructions remain in concluding the agreement, or if the issues are regulatory or legislative that need to be resolved first before any preferential trade access to either side can be granted by the other.

According to the official website of the Indian prime minister, Modi delivered a joint statement to the press alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, continuing his comments on terrorism being unacceptable in any form, expressions and manifestations including cross border terrorism which was unequivocally supported by the Israeli side.

The summit’s official outcomes have been listed as 16 agreements across domains such as emerging technologies, cyber, agriculture, water management, health, entrepreneurship, mobility, defence and security. One of these agreements is an MoU between India’s NPCI International (NIPL) and Israel’s MASAV on implementation of India’s Unified Payments Interface (UPI) digital payments system in Israel.

Modi made a reference to being informed that the agreement will now lead the way in enabling UPI to be functional in Israel. The goal behind the agreement is to enable seamless remittances between Israeli and Indian nationals, companies and entities via an instant and well regulated digital mechanism.

UPI is a fully sovereign technology as part of India’s digital public infrastructure and doesn’t rely on any third party services like SWIFT. While SWIFT is the ubiquitous standard for cross border digital payments, the exclusion of Russian financial institutions from it after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine has established a precedent.

States with a high sense of sovereign fiscal patterns in international trade seek to develop or adopt alternatives which can’t be cut off depending on the political and alignment calculations of third parties at any time.

While defence agreements were also expected as the two countries have a burgeoning security relationship and shared cross border threats, nothing substantive on the procurement of new platforms or systems was announced during or in conjunction to the visit.

‘Despicable’: Vance, Oz Announce Freeze on Some Medicaid Funding for Minnesota

“The Constitution clearly gives Congress the power to spend taxpayer funds, and no law allows the president to halt if he feels some US states aren’t being ‘good stewards’ of the money,” said one critic.


US Vice President JD Vance speaks while Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz looks on during a February 25, 2026 press conference at the White House in Washington, DC.
(Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Brett Wilkins
Feb 25, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

US Vice President JD Vance said Wednesday that the Trump administration will pause some Medicaid funding for Minnesota over fraud concerns—without offering any guarantees that the suspension will not adversely impact the more than 1 million Minnesotans who depend upon the key healthcare program.

“We’re announcing today that we have decided to temporarily halt certain amounts of Medicaid funding that is going to the state of Minnesota in order to ensure that the state of Minnesota takes its obligations seriously to be good stewards of the American people’s tax money,” Vance said at a White House press conference with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Mehmet Oz.

“Now what is this gonna mean?” Vance continued. “What this means is that, first of all, the providers on the ground in Minnesota have actually already been paid... What we’re doing is we are stopping the federal payments that will go to the state government until the state government takes it obligations seriously to stop the fraud that’s being perpetrated.”



Oz demanded that Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz determine “who these providers are; make sure they’re not already in trouble for doing bad stuff, and then reevaluate all the current providers to make sure they’re supposed to be able to provide these services.”

Responding to Oz’s remarks, Gaia Leadership Project founder Elizabeth Cronise McLaughlin said on Bluesky, “So Minnesota is supposed to review every appointment by a Medicaid recipient with every doctor to get funds already lawfully allocated to the state?”

Asked by a reporter how he intends to ensure that the funding pause “doesn’t impact the people who are enrolled in Medicaid,” Vance said he is “worried about the justice of it all.”

“I think it’s offensive that American taxpayers pay into these programs and they’re defrauded... and it’s really sad that American children who need these services are unable to get them, because they’re going to fraudsters,” Vance replied.

“Look, we’re certainly gonna make sure that our anti-fraud efforts go after the fraudsters and not after anybody who actually benefits from these services,” he continued. “But I actually think the question is a little off, in a way, because the problem is not going after the fraud, the problem is that these programs are being defrauded to begin with.”

“Our social safety net will disappear unless we take fraud more seriously,” added the vice president, whose boss, President Donald Trump, last year signed into law the biggest cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, in the nation’s history as part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Medicaid is the primary healthcare safety net for lower-income Americans, with nearly 70 million people enrolled nationwide at the end of last year.

While federal prosecutors are investigating Minnesota’s Medicaid system—specifically, 14 high-risk service programs such as housing support and personal-care services—on suspicion of billions of dollars in fraudulent billings since 2018, and dozens of people have been convicted of stealing public money through the state’s social services system, critics noted that Congress, not the president, has the power of the purse.


Some observers noted that Trump has already targeted Minnesota—which voted against him all three times he ran for president—with his deadly crackdown on undocumented immigrants and their defenders and racist attacks on Somali immigrants, including Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.).

The Medicaid freeze follows the Trump administration’s $10 billion cut in federal childcare funding to five Democrat-led states, including Minnesota, last month—a move that opponents argue punishes working families who committed no fraud.

University of Illinois professor Nicholas Grossman called the Medicaid pause “taxation without representation.”

“The Constitution clearly gives Congress the power to spend taxpayer funds, and no law allows the president to halt if he feels some US states aren’t being ‘good stewards’ of the money,” he said on Bluesky. “In case there’s any confusion on this, the Impoundment Control Act forbids it.”

“The people of Minnesota vote for representatives to Congress,” Grossman added. “Minnesota representatives and senators were in DC, representing their constituents, when Congress passed laws using proper procedure that allocated Medicaid funding. The president breaking those laws violates the fundamental compact of the republic.”

Oz on Wednesday also announced “a six-month national moratorium blocking all new enrollments for durable medical equipment—prosthesis, orthotics—supplies across the board” in the name of fighting fraud. The move targets suppliers, not individual Medicaid beneficiaries.

This from Oz, a promoter of privatized Medicare Advantage programs, which are notorious for overcharging taxpayers and denying patients necessary care. The CMS under Oz increased federal funding for Medicare Advantage plans by more than $25 billion for 2026.

As Common Dreams recently reported, United Health Group (UHG), one of the country’s largest for-profit health insurance companies, has been the leading beneficiary of a long-running Medicare Advantage fraud scheme that the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission—an independent, nonpartisan legislative branch agency—warned could cost US taxpayers $1.2 trillion over the next decade.

Some critics said that if Trump really cared about fraud, he’d go after companies like UHG—and stop pardoning so many convicted criminals who committed billions of dollars worth of fraud.

“These guys are despicable,” Michigan State University professor Brendan Cantwell said Wednesday in response to Vance and Oz’s announcement.

Robert Weissman, co-president of the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, said in a statement Wednesday that “Medicaid fraud is a serious problem that requires cracking down on fraudsters—not patients.”

Weissman continued:
This administration’s anti-fraud rhetoric is itself a fraud. In fact, the administration has gutted anti-fraud government agencies and programs and let fraudsters off the hook. It has issued record-breaking pardons to fraudsters; sought to eliminate the most important anti-consumer fraud agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau; eviscerated the corps of inspectors general whose job is to root out waste, fraud, and abuses; and dropped dozens of fraud and fraud-related investigations against large corporations.

“The Trump administration suspension of Medicaid funding in Minnesota is a bad-faith, punitive, and shameful measure that will punish people in Minnesota as part of the same deceptive story that the Trump administration has told to justify the outrageous [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] invasion of the state,” Weissman added.


Former Brazilian Political Officials Found Guilty of Plotting Murder of Marielle Franco

“What the killers did not expect is that her legacy would become greater than all of this,” said Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Carmen Lúcia.



A man walks past a graffiti depicting Brazilian slain Brazilian councilwoman Marielle Franco, near the site where she was murdered in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil on March 14, 2019.
(Photo by Carl De Souza/AFP via Getty Images)

Brad Reed
Feb 25, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

A five-judge panel on Brazil’s Supreme Court on Wednesday voted unanimously to convict former Congressman Chiquinho Brazão and his brother, politician Domingos Brazão, of ordering the 2018 murder of Rio de Janeiro City Councilwoman Marielle Franco and her driver, Anderson Gomes.

As reported by Reuters, the court sentenced the Brazão brothers to each serve 76 years in prison for plotting to assassinate the 38-year-old Franco because they feared she and her allies in the Socialism and Liberty Party would be an impediment to their illegal scheme that involved taking public lands to develop private real estate projects.

Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who oversaw the trial of the brothers, said that the two men did not think they would be held accountable for killing Franco because she was a Black woman who represented a poor neighborhood in Rio.

“Inside the misogynistic, prejudiced minds of those who ordered and carried out the crime, who would care about that?” Moraes said. “They did not expect such wide repercussions.”

Justice Carmen Lúcia also said that the Brazão brothers seemed to believe that they would be allowed to get away with murder.

“What the killers did not expect,” said Lúcia, “is that her legacy would become greater than all of this.”

The court also sentenced former Rio de Janeiro Police Chief Rivaldo Barbosa to an 18-year prison sentence for obstructing the investigation into Franco’s murder.

Franco’s widow, current Rio City Councilwoman Mônica Benício, told Payday Report that the court’s conviction of the plotters was a landmark decision for Brazilian democracy.


“For the country, this is an opportunity to demonstrate its capacity to break with the selective penal system that protects criminal structures and their political ties,” Benício said. “We must learn a lesson from what the assassination of Marielle and Anderson reveals about Brazil: the obscure connections between crime, politics, and the police.”

Anielle Franco, a sister of Marielle Franco who currently serves as Brazil’s Minister of Racial Equality, hailed the verdict as “justice” in a social media post, vowing that “our fight continues for all victims of violence.”

Agnes Callamard, secretary general of Amnesty International, said that justice for Franco and Gomes was “a long time coming,” and added that “their killings are emblematic of the broader and highly alarming trend of lethal violence and structural racism against human rights defenders in Brazil.”