Wednesday, April 08, 2026

 

JD Vance praises Viktor Orban, accuses EU and Ukraine of meddling in Hungarian elections

THE REAL MEDDLER IS RUSSIA

JD Vance praises Viktor Orban, accuses EU and Ukraine of meddling in Hungarian elections
/ Facebook/Viktor OrbanFacebook
By bne IntelliNews April 8, 2026

US Vice President JD Vance praised Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban for his leadership on energy security, calling him a model for other European leaders to follow amid the continent's ongoing energy crisis at a joint press conference in Budapest on April 7.

Despite the geopolitical tension, Vance paid a visit to Budapest to endorse US President Donald Trump's strongest EU ally, just days before the pivotal elections on April 12. After 16 years of supermajority rule, Hungary's veteran leader is at risk of losing out to a younger challenger, former Fidesz cadre Peter Magyar, whose grassroots movement has become the largest political bloc in two years.

During a joint press conference at Orban's office in the Castle, Vance emphasised the importance of energy independence and affordability for European families, stating that EU leaders should have followed Hungary's energy policies under Orban. 

While energy prices were high across the continent, Hungary had managed to mitigate these increases more effectively than most, he said. Analysts point out that while Hungary previously benefited from a clear price advantage in purchasing crude oil from Russia, a situation that held before the Iran war, this advantage did not translate into lower prices for consumers.

Although the specifics of Hungary's long-term gas contract with Gazprom, signed in 2021, remain confidential, trade data indicate that Budapest is not currently experiencing a price benefit. Reports suggest that the pricing follows the TTF benchmark, with a two-month delay.

He added that his visit also sought to highlight the moral cooperation between the U.S. and Hungary, driven by shared values of Western civilisation and Christian traditions.

He accused Brussels bureaucrats of trying to undermine Hungary's economy, energy independence, and political leadership, calling the level of interference from the European Union "truly disgraceful." Vance said,

"Hungary is facing one of the worst examples of foreign election interference that I've ever seen. The bureaucrats in Brussels have tried to destroy the economy of Hungary and drive up consumer prices, simply because they hate "this guy", he said.

Vance also expressed his support for Orban ahead of Hungary's parliamentary election, although he said the United States will cooperate with Hungary's next government, regardless of who leads it, when asked by Reuters.

"I am confident that Viktor Orban is, of course, going to win", he added.

Orban was heard saying: "That is the plan," while making a hand gesture that roughly conveyed "not so sure." In an interview with the radical right Ultrahang portal, he said the gesture signalled that the battle is still open and said: "We're gaining momentum now as we can focus on the campaign from March 15, while opposition does not have the burden of governance," he added.

Opposition leader Peter Magyar said Vance's comment at the press conference indicates that Washington is no longer counting on Orban's election victory. The new Tisza-led government would regard the US as a key partner, both as a Nato ally and an economic partner, and he extended an invitation to the US leaders to visit Budapest for the occasion of the 70th anniversary of the 1956 Hungarian Revolution on October 23.

At the same time on X, and at his many rallies over the past weeks, Magyar stressed that Hungarian history is not written in Washington, Moscow, or Brussels; it is written in Hungary's streets and squares.

Vance also praised Orban's diplomatic efforts, saying he "has done more than anyone to help the U.S. leadership understand what Ukraine and Russia need to achieve peace."

In a later interview with pro-government Index.hu he said that the prime minister's international role extends beyond Hungarian politics. "Viktor is one of those statesmen in the world whom we can rely on. He is truly capable of mediating and engaging in dialogue with both the Ukrainians and the Russians. For this reason, he is an invaluable asset to us. This is why I support Viktor. The opposition is not my focus," he added.

Vance said that "elements within the Ukrainian intelligence services" were trying "to put their thumb on the scale" of US and Hungarian elections, without providing evidence.

Later at a campaign rally at a Budapest sports hall, dubbed Hungarian-US Friendship Day 2026, Vance put Trump on speakerphone. The US president called Orban "a fantastic man" and praised their "tremendous relationship".

"Remember this: he didn't allow people to storm your country and invade your country as other people have," he said, referring to Orban's anti-immigration policies.

In his speech, the Hungarian leader heaped praise on the strategic partnership and cooperation with the US, thanks to Trump, who "put an end to the power of the globalist elite ruling in the name of ideologies and proclaimed the era of strong nations."

Bilateral relations entered into a new golden age, he said, highlighting tangible benefits such as visa-free travel, economic collaboration, joint defence initiatives, and shared energy projects.

In his speech, he underscored the "civilisational and spiritual" foundation of the Hungarian-American friendship, invoking the shared values of freedom and independence as central to the relationship.

The Hungarian prime minister devoted much of his speech to criticising the European Union, framing Brussels as a stronghold of progressive forces that are "holding Europe captive." He accused the EU of imposing harmful policies, such as gender ideology, open borders, and interventionist foreign policies that have led to economic instability.

He sharply criticised the EU's sanctions regime targeting Russia, calling them "irresponsible" and likening them to "suicide." He warned that these sanctions would result in skyrocketing energy prices and the depletion of Europe's energy supplies.

He lashed out at Brussels for "not representing us, but colluding with the Ukrainians" in the energy blockade of Hungary, and for trying to trivialise the "attempted sabotage of the TurkStream pipeline."

Orban concluded his speech by urging a united front between freedom-loving Americans and Hungarians to preserve Western civilisation. He identified three key areas for action: defeating progressive forces in Brussels, ending the war in Ukraine, and resolving the energy crisis.

Orban framed Hungary's election as a decision between two paths: one of submission, where Hungary loses significance, where the country would be forced to send soldiers and money to Ukraine. The other path is one of freedom, where the nation stands proudly on its own. He urged voters to support peace, Hungary's security, and its future, believing that choosing freedom could spark a European "reclamation movement" of patriotic governments.

libcomhttps://libcom.org  › article  › hungary-56-andy-anderson

Hungary '56 - Andy Anderson | libcom.org

Andy Anderson's pamphlet, written in 1964 and published by Solidarity is invaluable as a guide to the events of the Hungarian uprising of 1956.


 

Argentina revokes press credentials amid probe into alleged Russian disinformation network

Argentina revokes press credentials amid probe into alleged Russian disinformation network
The move follows findings by an international consortium of investigative media that a Russian network known as “La Compañía” financed the placement of pro-Russian content in Argentine media between June and October 2024.Facebook
By bnl editorial staff April 8, 2026

Argentina’s government revoked press credentials for several local media outlets on April 6 following allegations they were linked to a Russian-backed disinformation campaign uncovered by an international investigation, escalating tensions between President Javier Milei’s administration and the press.

Journalists from outlets including Ámbito Financiero, C5N, La Patriada FM, A24, El Destape and Tiempo Argentino were denied access to the presidential palace and, in some cases, Congress, according to reporters and media organisations. One journalist said that she was informed upon arrival that her name was on a list barring entry, EFE reported.

The move follows findings by an international consortium of investigative media that a Russian network known as “La Compañía” financed the placement of content in Argentine media between June and October 2024. According to leaked documents cited in the investigation, the network allocated about $283,000 to publish at least 250 articles under fake aliases across more than 20 outlets to promote pro-Russia narratives amid the war in Ukraine. Since taking office in December 2023, Milei has emerged as a staunch supporter of Kyiv, in stark contrast to the previous Peronist administration, which took a more neutral stance on the conflict. This is said to have alarmed Moscow and prompted the Kremlin to mount a covert influence operation targeting Argentine outlets, according to the investigation.

Argentina’s government echoed the findings, saying the operation sought to “disseminate false information and influence Argentine public opinion in favour of foreign geopolitical interests,” a claim previously raised by the State Intelligence Secretariat (SIDE).

President Milei described the revelations as highly serious and pledged further action. “We will pursue this to the fullest extent to identify all the direct and indirect actors who participated in this illegal espionage network,” he said on social media. He added that “‘journalists’ and ‘media outlets’ linked to this are only the tip of the iceberg of something much bigger.”

The investigation reported that the alleged network used intermediaries such as agencies and consultants to distribute content, some of which contained distortions or falsehoods, while other pieces were published under fabricated identities, including AI-generated profile images. Several targeted outlets denied receiving payments, although some sources acknowledged compensation linked to private actors concerned about government policies.

The probe also suggested the network attempted to inflame regional tensions, including by circulating false claims about Argentine actions targeting infrastructure in neighbouring Chile.

Press freedom groups criticised the government’s decision to restrict access. The Buenos Aires Press Union (SiPreBA) said the measure aimed to silence critical journalism, stating that authorities were preventing accredited reporters from entering official institutions.

The revocation comes after the government introduced stricter accreditation rules in May 2025, including tighter quotas, scoring requirements and enhanced conduct regulations. The latest developments add to a broader climate of friction between the administration and the media, marked by accusations of censorship, budget cuts affecting public outlets and reports of hostility towards journalists during protests.

PANNIER: Uzbekistan’s air pollution officials search for lasting solutions

PANNIER: Uzbekistan’s air pollution officials search for lasting solutions
Most of eastern Central Asia suffers horrendous difficulties with air pollution. / Janusz Walczak via PixabayFacebook
By Bruce Pannier April 7, 2026

Uzbekistan’s air pollution problem has noticeably worsened over the last several years, but at the end of March authorities strengthened efforts to combat the dilemma.

The government introduced a series of measures aimed at lowering the choking pollution and effects caused by increasingly frequent dust storms.

Previous steps have not been sufficiently effective, but the government has unveiled a five-year plan specifically to deal with air quality issues.

Toxic to breathe

It is not only Uzbekistan but most of the eastern part of Central Asia, where most of the region’s population lives, that suffers heightened levels of air pollution.

Decades of using coal as a primary source of generating electricity and heating homes has contributed to the pollution problems now being seen.

More recently, winds blowing over the desiccated Aral Sea bed in western Central Asia have brought ever greater amounts of dust eastward, darkening the skies as far away as Tajikistan in the region’s southeastern corner.

On January 3, 2024, the website IQAir, which monitors air quality globally, rated the air quality in the Uzbek capital Tashkent as “very unhealthy,” and second only to New Delhi in terms of pollutants.

On February 21-22, 2024, IQAir ranked Tashkent as having the worst air quality in the world. Also on February 22, Kazakhstan’s capital Astana and Kyrgyzstan’s capital Bishkek ranked 9th and 19th, respectively.


 

World's most polluted countries & regions
(Ranking based on annual average PM2.5 concentrations (μg/m³). PM2.5 refers to fine particulate matter air pollution that is 2.5 micrometres or less in diameter, in other words, small enough to enter deep into the lungs and bloodstream).

Graphic credit: IQAir.

Tashkent does not even have the worst air pollution in Uzbekistan. Yearly averages show Uzbekistan’s eastern city of Ferghana, home to one of the country’s oil refineries, has the worst air quality problem.

Then there are the dust storms. Not long ago, dust storms were rare in Central Asia, but in recent years they have become common events.

In 2025, Tajikistan was hit by 63 dust storms, up from 35 in 2024.

A huge dust storm blew into Tashkent on May 17, 2025, cutting visibility on main streets to a few hundred metres.

Dust blown from the dried-out Aral Sea area often carries alkaline soil left as the water evaporated from the seabed. This alkaline soil causes respiratory ailments in people and destroys crops.

Time to get serious

In January 2024, as air pollution was growing worse, activists staged a flashmob under the hashtag #TozaHavoKerak (clean air needed), calling on authorities to find a lasting solution to the problem.

Protests of any kind are extremely rare in Uzbekistan, so the event itself was an indication of public desperation at the air quality situation.

After the horrible air pollution in the first two months of 2024, Uzbek authorities started to broadcast warnings to alert the public about rising levels or air pollution or to when dust storms were coming. It didn’t ease the problem. It only reminded the population that it was hazardous to breathe.

On February 21, 2024, Uzbek President Shavkat Mirziyoyev signed an order for a “Day without Automobiles” in Tashkent. One day per month, people in the Uzbek capital were to leave their vehicles at home and use public transportation to get to work.

State employees were told to set a “personal example” by taking public transportation to and from work.

It was billed as part of the “Uzbekistan-2030” strategy, but it never caught on and air pollution in Tashkent and other parts of Uzbekistan continued to plague residents.

So, two weeks ago, Mirziyoyev signed a decree on “Measures to Implement the National Project ‘Clean Air’ Aimed at Improving Air Quality.”

The project establishes targets for cleaning up the air, such as a 10.5 % reduction in the release of toxic substances and reducing the number of days when pollution hits dangerous levels.

The strategy is being rolled out gradually, starting in Uzbekistan’s section of the Fergana Valley, where the highest concentration of people lives, and then moving west, and finishing in Karakalpakstan and Khorezm in December this year.

The strategy also specifies that starting in May, the 10th and 25th of every month will be the “Day without Automobiles,” though the decree also mentions a “Week with Automobiles.” This time, “civil servants are strictly prohibited from using official vehicles.”

New bicycle lanes will appear across Tashkent and starting from August 1, people can trade in their older vehicles and receive financial credit on the purchase of new cars.

Tashkent will introduce a system that alerts residents via SMS, the media, and using digital platforms to an expected drastic worsening of air quality. And naturally, fines for violating air protection rules are substantially increased and fines for repeat offenders will be fined more than doubled.

Companies that fail to report full and accurate data on emissions also face stiff fines.

On April 1, the Green Nation programme was launched. The goal is to increase Uzbekistan’s “green coverage” area from the current 14.2% to 30% by 2030.

There are also plans to  plant “green belts” in 33 districts to mitigate the effects of dust storms.

The same day the programme was unveiled, work started on planting “green walls” in the Surhandarya and Syrdarya provinces to screen out dust.

The race Is on

Uzbekistan has been working on developing the country’s renewable energy output, particularly solar and wind.

Of some 86.7-billion-kilowatt hours (kWh) of domestically produced electricity in 2025, some 16.8 billion kWh came from renewable energy sources, a 29% increase from 2024. Uzbekistan’s Energy Ministry noted that the boost in renewable energy use prevented some 4.7 tonnes of pollutants from being released into the air.

But Uzbekistan is aiming at a rapidly moving target. A big push in industrialisation combined with a population that since 2015 has been increasing at an average of 700,000 people annually creates an expanding demand for energy.

Uzbekistan was once a natural gas exporter, but for the last four years the country has been boosting gas imports, mainly from Russia and delivered via a pipeline that not long ago carried Uzbek gas to Russia.

It seems that every autumn, officials say the country can meet its energy needs through winter, but shortly after the New Year reports appear about sales of coal and wood soaring.

The new “clean air” programme Mirziyoyev signed runs from 2026 to 2030. Previous attempts at combatting air pollution did not include a long-term strategy, so this latest attempt is, if nothing else, more structured and enduring with specific goals.

The question now is whether these new regulations and targets, coupled with developing renewable energy sources can meet the demands of a growing number of factories and plants and an increasing population and still alleviate a pollution problem that has accumulated over the course of decades.


New research reveals that cutting emissions is not the only way to save lives from air pollution





Stockholm Environment Institute



  • 52% of the global decrease in air pollution mortality rates was driven by reductions in vulnerability, such as improved access to quality healthcare and poverty reduction, rather than just cleaner air (between 1990 and 2019)  


  • Without these unintended “shields”, 1.7 million more people would have died globally from air pollution in 2019 

A major new global modelling study led by researchers at Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) at the University of York challenges the international focus on air pollution. Published in The Lancet Planetary Health, the study finds that reducing population vulnerability is as important as cutting emissions for saving lives. 

The research reveals that while reducing exposure to pollutants is critical, measures such as universal access to quality healthcare and poverty reduction played a crucial, and often overlooked, role in saving lives over the last 30 years. 

A population’s risk of harm from air pollution is shaped by a complex set of socioeconomic and health factors, including pre-existing medical conditions, smoking and the quality and accessibility of medical care. In some regions where air quality has not improved, air pollution mortality rates have still dropped exclusively because of reductions in these vulnerability factors. 

“While cleaning our air remains a critical goal, our findings demonstrate that reducing emissions is only part of the solution,” said Chris Malley, lead author of the study from SEI at the University of York. “To improve public health, we must also focus on the factors that make people susceptible to harm. Integrating healthcare improvements and poverty reduction into air quality strategies is an essential tool for protecting the world's most vulnerable populations from the deadly effects of air pollution.” 

Key findings: 

  • Between 1990 and 2019, global air pollution mortality rates decreased by 45%. Approximately 52% of the decrease in global air pollution mortality rates was due to reductions in vulnerability, rather than just lower pollution levels. 

  • Without the global actions that reduced people's vulnerability to air pollution, an estimated 1.7 million more people would have died from air pollution-related causes in 2019 alone. 

  • Global poverty plummeted from 45% in 1990 to 21% in 2019, acting as a massive, unintended shield against the health burdens of smog. 

  • Public health efforts such as reducing obesity, cutting smoking rates, and treating hypertension are rarely included in air pollution strategies, despite their significant impact on reducing mortality. 

The study also highlights the benefits of combining reductions in air pollution exposure with efforts to strengthen resilience. Both Europe and North America saw similar declines in air pollution exposure between 1990 and 2019. However, reductions in air pollution-related mortality were almost twice as large in Europe, reflecting greater progress in reducing vulnerability through health and social improvements. 

The study concludes that air quality strategies must evolve to include interventions that reduce non-air-pollution health determinants to complement traditional exposure reduction efforts. 

Notes to editors  

About the study  

“Estimating the vulnerability contribution to 1990–2019 changes in the health burden of ambient air pollution: a global modelling study” was published in The Lancet Planetary Health. It can be read here

About Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI)  

Stockholm Environment Institute is an international non-profit research institute that tackles climate, environment and sustainable development challenges. We empower partners to meet these challenges through cutting-edge research, knowledge, tools and capacity building. Through SEI’s HQ and seven centres around the world, we engage with policy, practice and development action for a sustainable, prosperous future for all. 

About the University of York  

A member of the prestigious Russell Group, the University of York is a dynamic, research-intensive university committed to institutional excellence and social purpose. 

Media contact 

Toto Reissland Lichman, Engagement and Research Communications Manager, Stockholm Environment Institute York, toto.reissland@sei.org, +44 (0)7976 098139 

 

From decades-long studies of humble grasses, new clues to climate resistance



Nearly 40 years of data on Midwestern prairies reveal that coping with weather extremes isn’t just a numbers game





Michigan State University

Kellogg Biological Station Long Term Ecological Research Site, Michigan State University 

image: 

Kellogg Biological Station Long Term Ecological Research Site, Michigan State University

view more 

Credit: Kellogg Biological Station Long Term Ecological Research Site, Michigan State University






In parts of the Midwest and Great Plains, feathery yellow goldenrod and stands of big bluestem sway alongside Indiangrass and other prairie plants, stretching up to eight feet tall.

Now, in the search for ways to help ecosystems withstand the weather extremes made worse by climate change, it seems that humble grassland plants like these may have some of the answers.

new analysis of nearly 40 years of data from three tracts of North American grassland confirms what researchers have long said: that biodiversity can be a natural defense against climate threats.

But the study also reveals that coping with climate extremes isn’t just a numbers game where the more species an ecosystem has, the better. Multiple dimensions of biodiversity can help nature survive — and thrive — in harsh conditions, the researchers report.

The findings were published April 7 in the journal Ecology Letters.

When it comes to coping with climate threats and other disturbances, the general rule of thumb has been that having more species helps. But most past studies have been limited to a single location or isolated weather events, said Ashley Darst, a doctoral candidate at Michigan State University who co-led the work.

To address this gap, the 15-person research team analyzed nearly four decades of data collected between 1980 and 2022 at three natural grasslands in Minnesota, Michigan and Kansas, including one of the largest remaining tracts of unplowed tallgrass prairie in North America.

The sites were part of the U.S. Long-Term Ecological Research Network, established in the 1980s by the National Science Foundation to better understand long-term changes to ecosystems.

For years, a generation of researchers have taken careful stock of the plants that grow here, tracking changes in what species are present, their relative abundance, how much plant material they produce. They have also recorded changes in temperature and rainfall over time.

Across the three sites, the researchers identified a total of 28 dry or rainy spells that met the criteria for once-a-decade weather events — conditions so extreme that you might expect to happen only once every 10 years.

In 1988, for example, nearly half of the country was gripped by the worst drought since the Dust Bowl. Rainfall that spring and summer in the central U.S. was the lowest it had been in nearly a century. River levels were at record lows. Yields of corn, soybeans, wheat and other grain crops dropped by 25% to 50% or more. 2012 was another year of deadly heat and scorching drought for the Corn Belt. Crops withered and dried up. Cattle went hungry or were sold off.

At the other extreme, 2019 was marked by drenching rains and record-breaking snowfall that made it the wettest year ever recorded for the Midwest. Farms were inundated, delaying planting season and making it difficult to harvest crops.

Sifting through the data, the researchers found that overall, plots with greater biodiversity were indeed more resistant to extreme climatic events. But the key dimensions of biodiversity that helped them cope in wet years weren’t the same as those for dry years.

“It’s context-dependent,” said study co-lead Joshua Ajowele, a doctoral candidate in biology at the University of North Carolina Greensboro.

In extreme dry years, species-rich plots tended to fare better — as measured by how much plant material they produced — than those with fewer species.

The results also showed that plots whose species abundances were more evenly distributed were more likely to bounce back afterwards.

But in wet years it wasn’t the number of species that mattered, or their relative abundance. Rather, certain species were more important to the health of the ecosystem than others. Plots with high relative abundance of the dominant species were more stable in the face of record rain and flooding.

The link between climate threats and biodiversity goes both ways, the researchers said. Ecosystems weakened by a loss of biodiversity are less resistant to extreme weather. In turn, extreme weather can make it harder for species to hold on, further reducing biodiversity and resistance to future events.

“So you kind of get this weird feedback effect,” said Darst, who is a member of MSU’s Department of Integrative Biology and the Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior Program. “As we get more and more extreme events, we might be eroding the protection against them.”

Extreme weather isn’t the only threat in the era of global change, Ajowele said. Other factors like nutrient pollution from agricultural runoff and nitrogen-laden smog can reduce biodiversity too.

“These factors in combination would have a more detrimental effect,” Ajowele said.

As major droughts and floods occur more often, then, the researchers hope that by understanding how prairie plants cope, they can uncover important lessons for the extremes that lie ahead for other ecosystems too.

“You have to look at more than just species richness,” Darst said.

“Other components of these communities could be important in shaping how they respond to extreme weather,” Ajowele added.

Other study co-authors include researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Dartmouth College, Denison University, Kansas State University, the University of Massachusetts, and the University of Minnesota.

This research was made possible by funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (DEB-1234162, DEB-1831944, DEB-1440484, DEB-2025849, DEB-1832042, DEB-2224712, DEB-0823341, DEB-0218210, IOS-9632851, and DEB-9011662).

CITATION: "Multiple community properties drive ecosystem resistance and resilience to extreme climate events across mesic grasslands," Joshua A. Ajowele, Ashley L. Darst, Nameer R. Baker, Rachael R. Brenneman, Caitlin Broderick, Seraina L. Cappelli, Maowei Liang, Mary Linabury, Matthew A. Nieland, Maya Parker-Smith, Smriti Pehim Limbu, Rosalie S. Terry, Moriah L. Young, Max Zaret, Marissa Zaricor. Ecology Letters, April 7, 2026. DOI: 10.1111/ele.70380