It’s possible that I shall make an ass of myself. But in that case one can always get out of it with a little dialectic. I have, of course, so worded my proposition as to be right either way (K.Marx, Letter to F.Engels on the Indian Mutiny)
Wednesday, April 01, 2026
With Nearly 50 Boats Attacked, US Strikes Highlight ‘Pattern of Unlawful Use of Lethal Force’: Human Rights Watch
“When unlawful force is repeated over time, it risks becoming normalized.”
A fisherman moves his fishing boat in a harbor in the Gulf of Paria, an inlet of the Caribbean Sea, on November 4, 2025, in Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
The Trump administration’s most recent attack on a boat in the Caribbean, which killed four people last week, “highlights a sustained pattern of unlawful use of lethal force outside any context of armed conflict, amounting to extrajudicial executions,” Human Rights Watch said on Tuesday.
The US militaryannounced last Wednesday that it had conducted its 47th attack on boats in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific. The Trump administration has presented little evidence for its claim that the targeted boats have been engaged in trafficking drugs to the United States. At least 163 people have been killed in these attacks since September 2025, all of them without trial.
Human Rights Watch is part of a chorus of international organizations and observers that have condemned the boat bombing campaign as acts of murder in flagrant violation of international law.
“These strikes aren’t one-off incidents, they’re part of a pattern of using military force where the law does not permit it, over and over again,” said Sarah Yager, Washington director at Human Rights Watch. “The fact that these strikes have faded from public attention does not make these violations any less grave or unlawful.”
The organization noted that there is no ongoing military conflict in the Caribbean or eastern Pacific that would make those traveling by boat legitimate targets.
And while the US government has provided scant evidence that those it has killed were trafficking drugs, Human Rights Watch said that even if evidence of drug trafficking existed, suspected criminals are still not lawful targets of lethal force unless they pose an imminent threat to the lives of others.
The boat strikes have continued in the background as President Donald Trump has launched attacks against Venezuela and Iran, both of which international organizations have described as acts of aggression that violate the laws of war.
Trump has also enacted a crippling economic blockade of Cuba with the explicit goal of toppling its government so the US can “take” the island, and has previously threatened to use economic leverage or the US military to forcibly annex Greenland.
“When unlawful force is repeated over time, it risks becoming normalized,” Yager said. “That’s dangerous because it opens the door to using lethal force whenever and wherever a government wishes and without constraints.”
Leaked Cable Details Rubio’s Push for Pro-US Propaganda That Includes Psyops and Social Media
The State Department initiative aims to thwart efforts to weaken US alliances, something President Donald Trump has done repeatedly on his own social media posts.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio gestures as he speaks to the press following a G7 Foreign Ministers’ meeting with Partner Countries before his departure at the Bourget airport in Le Bourget, outside Paris, on March 27, 2026. (Photo by Brendan Smialowski / Pool / AFP via Getty Images)
A leaked diplomatic cable signed by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio instructs American embassies and consulates worldwide to engage in a coordinated campaign to counter foreign propaganda, which the missive defines in part as messaging that seeks to “shift blame to the United States.”
The Guardian, which obtained a copy of the cable, reported on Monday that US State Department employees have been asked to “work alongside the US military’s psychological operations unit to address the problem of rampant disinformation” on social media.
The cable points to the Community Notes feature on Elon Musk’s X platform, which allows other X users to provide context or correct false claims on other users’ posts, as a particularly useful feature for the US to push back against narratives promoted by foreign governments.
The initiative’s main goals are “countering hostile messaging, expanding access to information, exposing adversary behavior, elevating local voices who support American interests, and promoting what it calls ‘telling America’s story,’” The Guardian reported.
In explaining the need to the initiative, the State Department cable cited foreign influence campaigns that “seek to shift blame to the United States, sow division among allies, promote alternative worldviews antithetical to America’s interests, and even undermine American economic interests and political freedoms.”
The cable did not address social media posts by US President Donald Trump, who has repeated sowed divisions among US allies. On Tuesday, for example, the president once again lashed out at European nations for not helping carry out his unconstitutional war with Iran, telling them to “start learning how to fight for yourself” because “the USA won’t be there to help you anymore, just like you weren’t there for us.”
The president’s posts have also undermined the country’s political freedoms, including multiple instances where he has described US journalists as the “enemy of the people,” while pushing for American TV networks to lose their broadcasting licenses if they continue airing negative stories about him and his administration.
The plan to combat foreign influence operations comes as the US has struggled to fight a propaganda battle against Iran, and Trump last month even floated “charges of treason” for journalists who report what he described as “fake news” about the conflict.
Trump Attack on Trans Athletes Continues as DOJ Sues Minnesota Education Department
“It is astonishing that any president would try to target, shame, and harass children just trying to be themselves, let alone a president with so many actual problems to address,” said the state attorney general.
Children hold placards supporting trans student-athletes during a demonstration in Columbus, Ohio on June 25, 2021. (Photo by Stephen Zenner/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
The US Department of Justice on Monday continued President Donald Trump’s crusade against transgender youth competing in sports in line with their identity by suing the Minnesota Department of Education and the state’s high school league.
“The United States files this action to stop Minnesota’s unapologetic sex discrimination against female student athletes,” says the complaint, filed in a federal court in the state by the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division.
“The state of Minnesota, through its Department of Education, and the Minnesota State High School League require girls to compete against boys in athletic competitions that are designated exclusively for girls and share intimate spaces, such as multiperson locker rooms and bathrooms, with boys,” the complaint continues. “This unfair, intentionally discriminatory practice violates the very core of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.”
The Associated Press noted that “the administration has filed similar lawsuits against Maine and California, and has threatened the federal funding of some universities over transgender athletes, including San José State in California and the University of Pennsylvania.”
Tim Leighton, a spokesperson for the league, told the AP that it does not comment on threatened or pending lawsuits. According to The New York Times, Emily Buss, a spokesperson for the state department, said Minnesota’s leadership was reviewing the complaint while remaining “committed to ensuring every child—regardless of background, ZIP code, or ability—has access to a world-class education.”
While Trump and his allies have aimed to stop all trans women and girls from competing as they identify—including at the 2028 Olympic Games in Los Angeles—the fight with Minnesota specifically traces back to the president’s February 2025 executive order, after which the administration began investigating the state.
The Minnesota Department of Education gets over $3 billion in federal funding. Democratic state Attorney General Keith Ellison sued to stop the administration from pulling that money last April. In September, the US departments of Education and Health and Human Services concluded that the state agency and league violated Title IX, and the case was referred to the DOJ in January.
In a Monday statement, Ellison said that the DOJ’s lawsuit “is just a sad attempt to get attention over something that’s already been in litigation for months.”
“Donald Trump is currently facing an unpopular war that he launched, rising gas prices, massive health insurance price hikes, and a partial government shutdown caused in part by his ICE agents killing two Minnesotans in broad daylight,” Ellison said, referring to Immigration and Customs Enforcement. “It is astonishing that any president would try to target, shame, and harass children just trying to be themselves, let alone a president with so many actual problems to address.”
The DOJ filing about trans student-athletes came less than a week after Ellison and other Minnesota officials sued the Trump administration over its refusal to cooperate with state investigators probing the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti by federal immigration agents earlier this year, as well as the shooting of Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis, who was wounded but survived.
US Supreme Court rules against ban on ‘conversion therapy’ for LGBTQ minors
The US Supreme Court ruled against a ban on 'conversion therapy' for LGBTQ youth, siding with a Christian therapist who said the law violated her free speech rights - Copyright AFP Alex WROBLEWSKI
The US Supreme Court ruled Tuesday against a Colorado state law banning “conversion therapy” for LGBTQ minors, siding with a Christian therapist who challenged it on the grounds of free speech.
At issue is the constitutionality of a 2019 Colorado law that prohibits licensed practitioners from conducting “conversion therapy” on patients under 18.
Proponents of the treatment claim to change the sexual orientation or gender identity of LGBTQ people.
The therapy has been discredited by major medical organizations, including the American Psychiatric Association and the American Medical Association, and is banned in more than 20 US states and much of Europe.
Research has shown that it is ineffective and even harmful, leading to depression and suicidal thoughts.
But in a 8-1 decision, the court ruled in favor of Kaley Chiles, a licensed mental health counselor who invoked her Christian faith and challenged the law, arguing that it violated her First Amendment right of free speech.
“Colorado’s law addressing conversion therapy does not just ban physical interventions. In cases like this, it censors speech based on viewpoint,” wrote conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch in the decision on behalf of the majority of the Court.
“As applied to Ms. Chiles, Colorado’s law regulates the content of her speech and goes further to prescribe what views she may and may not express, discriminating on the basis of viewpoint,” he argued.
The First Amendment, Gorsuch wrote, is a “shield against any effort to enforce orthodoxy in thought or speech in this country.”
As a result, the Supreme Court sent the case back to the lower courts to review their decisions in light of this ruling.
– ‘Can of worms’ –
Only the liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed dissent, accusing her colleagues of opening “a dangerous can of worms” by undermining states’ ability to regulate medical practices that “risks grave harm to Americans’ health and wellbeing.”
“The Constitution does not pose a barrier to reasonable regulation of harmful medical treatments just because substandard care comes via speech instead of scalpel,” she wrote.
Chiles’ lawyer, James Campbell, of the conservative Alliance Defending Freedom, hailed the ruling in a statement as “a significant win for free speech, common sense, and families desperate to help their children.”
After taking office for his second term in January, President Donald Trump said the US government would only recognize two genders — male and female — and signed an executive order restricting gender transition medical procedures for people under the age of 19.
In June, the Supreme Court voted 6-3 to uphold a Tennessee state law banning hormone therapy, puberty blockers and gender transition surgery for minors.
Conversion therapies are banned, at least partially, in many countries, with the support of health organizations such as the Royal College of Psychiatrists in Great Britain.
The UN has called for a global ban, describing them as discriminatory, humiliating and a violation of individuals’ bodily integrity.
‘Kids Will Suffer’: Supreme Court Axes Colorado’s Ban on Harmful LGBTQ+ ‘Conversion Therapy’ Young people are more than twice as likely to attempt suicide if they have been subject to conversion therapy, which LGBTQ+ rights advocates say is “proven to cause lasting psychological harm.” Demonstrators with the Human Rights Campaign stand outside the United States Supreme Court on Capitol Hill on October 7, 2025, in Washington, DC. (Photo by Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images)
The US Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down Colorado’s ban on “conversion therapy,” drawing warnings from LGBTQ+ groups that the ruling could expose children in dozens of states to the harmful practice.
Colorado’s law forbade licensed physicians and mental healthcare providers from attempting to “convert” or change a minor’s sexuality, a practice that the American Psychological Association has found to be both ineffective and dangerous, raising rates of depression, anxiety, and suicide in LGBTQ+ youth.
The law defined “conversion therapy” as any treatment that “attempts or purports to change an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity, including efforts to change behaviors or gender expressions or to eliminate or reduce sexual or romantic attraction or feelings toward individuals of the same sex.”
It allowed exemptions for pastors and religious organizations. It also allowed health professionals to engage in wide-ranging discussions with children about their sexual and gender identities, so long as they did not try to change the child’s orientation.
Nevertheless, on Tuesday, the high court sided 8-1 with Kaley Chiles, a Christian counselor who said she wished to offer talk therapy to children who want to reduce same-sex attraction and argued that the ban on this practice was in violation of her First Amendment rights.
Most famously, the group argued in support of state laws criminalizing homosexuality in the 2003 Lawrence v. Texascase, and it has since gone on to back many other cases attacking birth control access, same-sex marriage, and transgender equality.
In the majority opinion, the conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote that Colorado’s law “censors speech based on viewpoint” and therefore must be subject to strict scrutiny—the highest form of judicial review, which the court determined it did not pass.
The lone dissenting justice, Ketanji Brown Jackson, argued that Chiles’ treatment was not mere speech, but that it was acting in her capacity “as a licensed healthcare professional,” which formed the crux of Colorado’s defense of the ban.
She argued that the ruling “opens a dangerous can of worms” and “threatens to impair states’ ability to regulate the provision of medical care in any respect.”
“Because the majority plays with fire in this case, I fear that the people of this country will get burned,” Jackson said.
Two liberals, Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, joined the conservatives in striking the law down. However, they argued in a concurring opinion that a full ban on therapy aimed at changing minors’ sexuality might be more lawful than the one Colorado passed, which included carveouts for specific circumstances.
Kagan also argued that allowing Colorado to outlaw conversion therapy could backfire and give red states the legal framework to also ban counselors from providing affirmative care to LGBTQ+ minors.
LGBTQ+ rights organizations have roundly condemned the court’s decision, which is expected to weaken bans on conversion therapy in the 23 states and the District of Columbia that currently have them.
“Today’s reckless decision means more American kids will suffer,” said Kelley Robinson, the president of the Human Rights Campaign. “The Court has weaponized free speech in order to prioritize anti-LGBTQ+ bias over the safety, health, and well-being of children.”
A 2024 mental health survey by the Trevor Project, an LGBTQ+ advocacy group, found that 13% of LGBTQ+ young people have been either threatened with or subject to conversion therapy—including about 1 in 6 transgender or nonbinary youth.
Previously, the group published peer-reviewed research in the American Journal of Public Health, showing that young people subject to conversion therapy were more than twice as likely to attempt suicide as their peers.
“These efforts, no matter what proponents call them, no matter what any court says, are still proven to cause lasting psychological harm,” said Trevor Project CEO Jaymes Black. “That’s why protections have been enacted in more than 20 states, and are supported by every major medical and mental health association in the country.”
Carl Charles, a senior attorney at Lambda Legal who joined more than a dozen survivors of the practice in a friend of the court brief in support of Colorado’s law, said, “I know firsthand the long-lasting harms of conversion therapy, having been subjected to it when I was 15 years old.”
“This practice did not change my sexual orientation or gender identity,” said Charles, a transgender man. “Instead, it destroyed important relationships and created shame and fear that took time and effort to undo. For many survivors, it is a reverberating life-long harm.”
“LGBTQ+ youth do not need to be changed,” Charles said. “Rather, like all youth, they need to be supported and celebrated for the unique and important people they are becoming.”
Colorado’s Democratic Gov. Jared Polis has said he will seek to pass new legislation that complies with the Supreme Court’s ruling.
“Conversion therapy doesn’t work, can seriously harm youth, and Coloradans should beware before turning over their hard-earned money to a scam,” Polis said. “I am evaluating the US Supreme Court ruling and working to figure out how to better protect LGBTQ youth and free speech in Colorado.”
In other states whose bans could be undermined by the ruling, efforts have already begun to ensure that providers who cause harm to children still face accountability.
In California, which has a similar ban on conversion therapy to Colorado’s, state Sen. Scott Weiner (D-11) introduced a bill proposing a longer statute of limitations and making it easier for LGBTQ+ individuals to bring malpractice claims against medical professionals who subject them to conversion therapy.
Weiner noted that the Supreme Court’s ruling “explicitly states that malpractice claims for conversion therapy are different than bans,” since they require a plaintiff to demonstrate injury caused by their treatment.
“You can’t ‘convert’ someone who’s LGBTQ—full stop—and people who think you can are peddling quackery,” Weiner said. “California will always have the community’s back.”
The 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline can be reached by calling or texting 988, or through chat at988lifeline.org. The Trevor Project, which serves LGBTQ+ youth, can be reached at 1-866-488-7386, by texting “START” to 678-678, or through chat atTheTrevorProject.org. Both offer 24/7, free, and confidential support.
Trump Lashes Out After Judge Blocks Construction of His White House Ballroom “Unless and until Congress blesses this project through statutory authorization, construction has to stop!” wrote US District Judge Richard Leon.
President Donald Trump was left fuming after a federal judge blocked construction of his planned White House ballroom.
In a ruling delivered Tuesday, US District Judge Richard Leon granted a preliminary injunction requested by the National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States, which had sued to stop the ballroom from being built.
While handing down the injunction, Leon reminded Trump that “the president of the United States is the steward of the White House for future generations,” then emphasized “he is not, however, the owner” of the building.
The judge—appointed by former President George W. Bush—found that Trump’s ballroom was the first time that a proposed major addition to the White House went forward without any kind of congressional approval, and he recommended that the president seek input from the legislative branch before moving forward with the project.
“Unless and until Congress blesses this project through statutory authorization, construction has to stop!” Leon wrote in his conclusion. “But here is the good news. It is not too late for Congress to authorize the continued construction of the ballroom project.”
The judge granted a two-week delay for his order to go into effect, but he warned any above-ground construction of the ballroom done in that time will be “at risk of being taken down depending on the outcome of this case.”
In a Truth Social post delivered after the ruling, the president angrily lashed out at National Trust for Historic Preservation, which he described as “a Radical Left Group of Lunatics.”
The president also claimed that his ballroom and the renovated John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts—which Trump shut down less than two months after illegally slapping his own name on the side of the building—“will be among the most magnificent Buildings of their kind anywhere in the World.”
Trump last year tore down the entire East Wing of the White House in preparation for the ballroom’s construction, which was set to begin this week.
The cost of the ballroom is estimated at $400 million, and Trump is financing it by soliciting donations from some of America’s wealthiest corporations—including several with government contracts and interests in deregulation—such as Apple, Lockheed Martin, Microsoft, Meta, Google, Amazon, and Palantir.
The president held an exclusive White House dinner for some of the largest donors to the ballroom in October, in a move that many critics decried as a “cash-for-access” event.
Staircase to Nowhere: MAGA’s Crowning Achievement The former East Wing Photo by Pedro Ugarte/AFP via Getty Image
In a perhaps unprecedented dark time for America and the world, let us take solace in our indomitable Dear Stable Genius, who remains unwaveringly focused on taking care of shiny business: Gold social security cards like Elvis, a $400 million, lopsided shed/ballroom with gaudy columns but no main entrance, and of course gold toilets - which all keeps him so busy he hardly has time to threaten Iran with war crimes. What a time to be alive, barely.
In actual good news, No Kings Day 3.0 drew between 8 and 12 million people, thus hovering tantalizingly close to the 3.5% of a nation’s populace historically required to overthrow an authoritarian regime. So good work, patriots. The over 3,000 protests, aka per Mike Johnson “Hate America rallies,” ranged from Alaska’s Utqiaġvik, the country’s northernmost city (7 people) to Ele’ele, Kaua’i, the westernmost, from over 100,000 in New York City to nine stalwarts on Maine’s Monhegan Island. Thousands of Trump’s neighbors in Palm Beach turned out, ending with a twilight march to Mar-A-Lago, or as close as they could get.
Their signs were brutal: “Elect A Rapist, Expect To Get Fucked. How Many Deaths For the Epstein War? Worst President Since Trump. Criminals Belong Behind Bars, Free Balls for Members of Congress Who Lost Them, Trump Rapes Kids, Impeach Pedolf Shitler, Putin’s Bitch, The Smallest Man Who Ever Lived. According to The Borowitz Report, Trump, furious about the large protests, argued they’d be much smaller if you subtract all Elon Musk’s kids there because they hate him: ”People are saying their number (was) much higher than 400, thousands, maybe millions. You take away Elon’s kids and almost no one was there.“
There were also “half-dozens to dozens of Americans” at One King co unter-protests, reports The Fucking News, who put the number at “many-ish...Organizers say there were barely any organizers,” with attendees ranging from “a tiny number of young people to a die-hard faction of dying people.” In Palm Beach, one man carried a heavy sign that read, “Deport the white liberals”; masked to protect himself “against the vindictive left,” he said he left soon after he was “attacked” by a woman who denied touching him; her comrades said the guy just dropped his sign “because he was too weak to carry it.”
Their small numbers did face competition from “the incredible shrinking CPAC,” also meeting that day in Grapevine, Texas with a turnout of “barely thousands.” Once a MAGA “center of political gravity,” this year’s event drew neither Trumps nor presidential candidates. One possible ick factor: MC was (still) CPAC chair Matt Schlapp, who in 2024 settled a pricey sexual misconduct lawsuit from a guy working on Hershel Walker’s (LOL) Senate campaign, who charged Schlapp groped him. The event did boast Todd Chrisley, a reality TV star doing 12 years in prison for massive fraud till Trump pardoned him. Here’s his welcome.
There was also a big contingent of South Korean “stop the steal” activists and supporters of former president Yoon Suk Yeol, impeached last year and now serving life in prison for insurrection. Still, the whole thing was a bit of a slog. Organizers tried to jazz up session subjects - a panel titled “Fraud” became “Ilhan Omar ‘Family’ Values”; Mercedes Schlapp beseeched factions not to “divide from within,” which is how you divide; and when Schlapp asked them, the clueless CPAC “crowdette” mistakenly, hilariously cheered the prospect of impeachment proceedings by what could be a newly-Democratic-controlled House. SAD!
Poor deplorable MAGA. Maybe they’re disheartened by Trump’s well-deserved plunging approval rating, now at barely 33%. Maybe it’s because their regime is such a half-assed shitshow and their people are such self-serving, hypocritical dickwads. As in: Amidst a government shutdown that’s seen TSA agents (starting salary $34,454) compelled to work without pay as Congress takes a two-week recess (pay over $170,000) on the taxpayers’ dime, TMZ urged readers to send in photos of vacationing pols, and here comes Lindsey Graham at Disney World, “The Most Magical Place On Earth,” gaily twirling a Little Mermaid bubble wand yet. America and Megyn Kelly: WTF.
Or maybe it’s because Commander-In-Chief Private Bonespurs started another forever quagmire without legal or political justification, and it turns out wars in the Middle East are hard and complex and above his pay grade - like health care! - to solve, and now with no good options he’s spewing up only staggering incoherence for strategy, like hailing “great progress” in imaginary “serious discussions” while pivoting to rabidly threatening to “conclude our lovely ‘stay’ in Iran” by “obliterating” their civilian infrastructure, electricity, energy and drinking water, which is a war crime. But talks are going “unbelievably well.”
Serious discussions with Iran
Image from Australia's The Shovel
Anyway, his true passion is turning every crass, stupid thing he or Elvis can think of fake gold like the Oval bordello and even Social Security cards, and slathering his repulsive name on structures, coins, currency, and building trashy, illegal monuments to himself like an obscene, unapproved, un-permitted, $400 million ballroom twice the size of the White House, because, “They’ve always wanted a ballroom,” except now it’s suddenly, “essentially a shed for what goes under it,” a massive military complex, presumably a bunker where, as merciful history would have it, he’ll finally free us of him, “and we’re doing it very well.”
He’s so ballroom-enraptured that on Air Force One he just pulled out a swath of drawings to show reporters, explaining, “I thought I’d do this now because it’s easier. I’m so busy...fighting wars and other things.” Quick mindless pivot to “hand-carved, beautiful, Corinthian columns” - “Corinthian wut” - he’s also reportedly re-imagining for the White House facade, a change deemed “at odds with universally held historic preservation standards.” Same, experts say of “barely scrutinized” ballroom plans, “riddled with design flaws” - disproportionate, pillars block windows, grand staircase to nowhere. WH lackey on “the best builder in the world”: “The American people can rest well knowing this project is in his hands.” We feel better already.
Trump's "plan" for his oversized shed/ballroomImages from New York Times
And then there’s his new gold toilet, mounted on a 10-foot throne near the Lincoln Memorial. The new masterwork of Secret Handshake (Best Friends Forever), it celebrates the renovation of the White House Lincoln Bedroom bathroom, all in gold, and “what this President has actually accomplished.” The toilet’s plaque reads, “In a time of unprecedented division, escalating conflict, and economic turmoil, President Trump focused on what truly mattered: remodeling the Lincoln Bathroom....This, his crowning achievement, is a bold reminder that (he) isn’t just a businessman, he’s taking care of business. It stands as a tribute to an unwavering visionary who looked down, saw a problem, and painted it gold.”
A Throne Fit For a King.Photo from Secret Handshake
‘This Is a Hiring Recession’: Economists Raise Red Flags at Latest Gloomy Data in Trump Economy
“Hiring was ice cold in February,” said one economist.
Job seekers attend a career fair in Harlem hosted by Assemblymember Jordan Wright on December 10, 2025, in New York City. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
New data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics released on Tuesday continued to show weakness in the American jobs market.
The latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) shows that the number of new hires in February decreased to 4.8 million, which was roughly 400,000 fewer hires than were recorded in February 2025.
The report also shows that the US hiring rate in February fell to just 3.1%, which is the lowest rate since April 2020, when the economy was shut down due to the global Covid-19pandemic.
The good news in the report is that the number of quits and layoffs remained relatively steady, meaning that people who already have jobs are retaining them at a healthy clip.
But Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, noted that these bad hiring numbers came before President Donald Trump launched an illegal war with Iran, which has since destabilized global energy markets and raised prices for oil, gasoline, and diesel fuel.
“This is a hiring recession,” Long wrote in a social media post. “And Americans are feeling it. There were notable hiring pullbacks in February in hospitality and construction. Bottom line: The job market was already frozen before the war in Iran began. It’s worrying that a ‘no hire, no fire’ situation could turn into a ‘no hire, start to fire’ job market quickly if there isn’t a resolution soon.”
Long’s analysis was echoed by Laura Ullrich, director of economic research at hiring site Indeed, who wrote in a research note flagged by Axios that hiring in the US “was stuck in neutral going into this [Iran] conflict,” and “getting it into gear just got harder” thanks to the war.
Guy Berger, director of economic research at the Burning Glass Institute, noted that hiring rates in the US hit 3.1% or lower the last two times the country was in a severe recession.
“3.1% is not only comparable to the Covid low point—it’s also comparable to late 2009 and early 2010, when the unemployment rate was around 10%,” Berger explained. “Hiring was ice cold in February.”
Scott Lincicome, a senior fellow at the libertarian Cato Institute who has been a harsh critic of Trump’s tariffs, found that the February JOLTS report wiped out an unexpected January increase in manufacturing job openings that the president’s allies attributed to his trade policies.
“Alas, the perils of cherry-picking,” Lincicome commented.
The new data on hiring in the US job market comes weeks after a BLS report estimated that the economy lost 92,000 jobs in February. On the whole, the American economy has posted a net loss of jobs since Trump announced his “liberation day” global tariffs in April 2025.
New Trump Rule Would Let Private Equity, Crypto ‘Endanger Retirement Savings of Millions’ “This isn’t about advancing the interests of retirement savers, it is about opening a new profit center for crypto and Wall Street,” said one critic.
A press conference by US President Donald Trump plays on television as traders clap on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange during afternoon trading on February 20, 2026 in New York City. (Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)
US President Donald Trump’s Labor Department on Monday unveiled a proposal that would welcome private equity and cryptocurrency investments into Americans’ 401(k) plans, the culmination of an aggressive Wall Street lobbying push that could leave the retirement savings of millions vulnerable to the wild swings of so-called “alternative assets.”
In addition to giving employers a green light to include private equity and crypto investments in 401(k) plans offered to workers, the new rule would establish a “safe harbor” allowing retirement account administrators to avoid legal action from employees who believe their funds were steered into excessively risky products.
“The legal immunity created by this safe harbor will incentivize financial advisers to pitch these toxic products, which will become ticking time bombs in tens of millions of retirement accounts, which will no doubt result in significant losses,” warned Benjamin Schiffrin, director of securities policy at the advocacy group Better Markets. “There are good reasons why 401(k) plans have been considered closed to private markets and cryptocurrencies, and those reasons have not changed. The only thing that has changed is the administration’s support for these industries and regulators’ willingness to do their bidding.”
“This is no reason to endanger the retirement savings of millions of Americans,” Schiffrin added.
Oscar Valdés Viera, senior policy analyst at Americans for Financial Reform, similarly warned that “opening 401(k)s to these products risks turning workers’ retirement savings into a Ponzi-like scheme that throws a lifeline to an industry scrambling for fresh cash.”
“This isn’t about advancing the interests of retirement savers, it is about opening a new profit center for crypto and Wall Street,” said Viera. “Retirement savers should not be bailing out these high-risk industries and subsidizing the Wall Street and crypto billionaire class.”
“Private equity firms should not get a free pass to loot workers’ 401(k) retirement savings.”
Americans currently hold over $10 trillion combined in 401(k) plans, a huge trove of wealth that the private equity industry has been working for years to access. The Labor Department indicated that its proposed rule would apply to over 720,000 retirement plans covering roughly 118 million workers.
The American Prospect reported Tuesday that the managers of private equity firms are “already pressuring companies, third-party administrators, and the consultants who advise them to list their offerings” among workers’ retirement plan options.
“One staffer at an institutional investor who is not authorized to speak to the media told the Prospect about their primary worry: that private equity will stick their most overvalued companies into continuation funds exclusively for 401(k) plan holders, or ‘retail investors,’ as they are known,” the outlet continued. “Private credit firms are retailoring their funds for 401(k) plans as well, and some of the biggest have already struck deals with asset managers like Voya and Vanguard. ‘I’d be shocked if the industry doesn’t attempt to dump their garbage onto retail,’ the staffer said.”
One recent analysis by the Private Equity Stakeholder Project (PESP) found that private equity funds for retail investors “dramatically underperformed publicly listed stock indexes” in 2025 while charging much higher fees.
Jim Baker, PESP’s executive director, said Monday that “private equity firms should not get a free pass to loot workers’ 401(k) retirement savings.”
“The bar for including private equity in 401(k)s should be extremely high,” said Baker. “Private equity funds have lagged public markets while charging much higher fees, and public pension funds are pulling back from the asset class. Instead, this rule risks shifting more financial risk onto workers who rely on their retirement savings for long-term security.”
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) also ripped the Labor Department rule, saying in a statement that “Americans facing an uncertain future in Trump’s economy will now have more reasons to question the security of their retirement savings—all so that Trump’s Wall Street buddies have another pile of cash to play with.”
“Anyone who cares about the financial security of working people,” said Warren, “should oppose this proposed rule.”
GOP May Kick 300,000 More Off Healthcare to Help Find $200 Billion for Trump’s Iran War
“Republicans in Congress want to cut Americans’ healthcare to pay for more war in Iran. Let that sink in.” House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington (R-Texas) talks with reporters outside the US Capitol on March 19, 2026. (Photo by Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc. via Getty Images)
“Republicans won’t think twice about *literally* sacrificing you to get their way.”
That’s how Democrats on the US House Ways and Means Committee responded to Axios’ Monday reporting on congressional Republicans considering more healthcare cuts to help fulfill President Donald Trump’s request for $200 billion to continue partnering with Israel for an unconstitutional war on Iran—including a potential ground invasion.
Other critics said:“Is this America First?” “You know who isn’t losing their government subsidized healthcare over this war that their government started? Israelis.” “Republicans would rather set money on fire than try to help a single American see a doctor.” “Cutting healthcare to pay for another regime change war in the Middle East. It’s like GOP want to lose in November.” “Are they calling this strategy Project Blue Wave?” “This should surprise no one: MAGA wants to pay for a war that no one wants by chipping away at your healthcare.”
Michael Hardaway, a geopolitical strategist who has worked for top Democrats, argued that they “must convert this into a House AND Senate majority in November,” noting that Republicans “took healthcare away from millions of Americans to pay for tax cuts for the 1%.”
That was last year, when congressional Republicans and Trump used the budget reconciliation process to pass their so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Between $1 trillion cuts to Medicaid over the next decade and failing to extend expiring Affordable Care Act (ACA) tax credits, the OBBBA is expected to strip healthcare coverage from up to 15 million Americans.
While the impacts of the OBBBA will play out over years, already, “in red states and blue states alike, Republican healthcare cuts are hitting communities like a wrecking ball,” Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said last week, while releasing a related report with House Energy and Commerce Committee Ranking Member Frank Pallone Jr. (D-NJ).
Wyden and Pallone found that over half of the people who reenrolled in an ACA plan this year have had to or plan to reduce spending on other essentials; at least 19 health facilities have closed across 11 states; and nearly 500 employees were laid off in four states because of the GOP’s healthcare cuts last year.
“Despite attempts by Trump and his allies to cast blame elsewhere, the stories and facts are rolling in from across the country,” Wyden said. “Democrats will not stop elevating the voices of Americans whose health is in harm’s way as a result of Republicans’ healthcare cuts.”
One proposal that the GOP considered but ultimately did not include in the OBBBA related to ACA cost-sharing reductions. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that the specific policy considered last year would save $31 billion but leave 300,000 more Americans uninsured through 2034.
Reporting emerged last week that House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington (R-Texas) wants to bring back the push for that policy. It quickly spurred criticism, with Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) saying: “Republicans in Congress want to cut Americans’ healthcare to pay for more war in Iran. Let that sink in.”
“Republicans ransacked $1 trillion from Medicaid, and then they more than doubled premiums for over 20 million Americans in order to fund tax breaks for billionaires and big corporations,” Leslie Dach, chair of the advocacy group Protect Our Care, said in a statement last week. “Now, care for 15 million working Americans will be ripped away, nursing homes and hospitals are on the chopping block nationwide, and Americans are buried under skyrocketing healthcare hikes.”
“But that’s not enough for Republicans who have been at war with working families’ healthcare for decades—now they want to slash healthcare even more to bankroll the war in the Middle East and to fund ICE, Trump’s unaccountable, lawless paramilitary force,” Dach continued, referring to US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. “The American people reject these Republican priorities and will make their voice known in November.”
Axios reported Monday on Arrington’s preferred timeline for a new budget package: “60 to 90 days,” he said.
Arrington is also eyeing some potential changes to Medicare, which provides health insurance coverage to Americans age 65 and older, according to Axios:One, known as “site-neutral” payments, would equalize payment across hospital outpatient facilities and doctors’ offices. A second would crack down on what critics say is insurance company gaming of the Medicare Advantage system through “upcoding” of patients’ medical conditions. Arrington expressed skepticism that either would be included, saying they’d open up “a false narrative that we’re cutting Medicare.”
As for Medicaid, one of the programs attacked by the OBBBA, Arrington told the outlet that there is hesitancy “to open that back up,” but some policies considered in 2025 could be revived.
In a Monday statement, Democratic National Committee rapid response director Kendall Witmer called out Trump and Vice President JD Vance for past and possible future GOP healthcare cuts, accusing them of breaking their campaign promises.
“Donald Trump and Republicans already made the largest cuts to healthcare in history, causing healthcare costs to skyrocket for millions of Americans while billionaires and big corporations get massive tax cuts,” Witmer said. “Now, Republicans want to slash even more healthcare funding for working families to pay for their war with Iran.”
“After promising on the campaign trail to stop the endless wars, reduce the national debt, and lower costs,” Witmer added, “Trump and JD Vance have done the opposite: putting everyday Americans on the chopping block to wage their deadly and costly war of choice.”
As Loudly Predicted, Trump-GOP Medicaid Cuts Decimating Hospitals Across US Of the roughly 450 hospitals identified in a new analysis as at risk of closure or service cuts, around 200 are located in congressional districts represented by Republicans.
A healthcare worker turns on a light in the emergency operation room at a medical complex in Hondo, Texas. (Photo by Kaylee Greenlee for The Washington Post via Getty Images)
The unprecedented Medicaid cuts that US President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans approved last summer are putting hundreds of hospitals across the country at high risk of cutting services or permanently shutting their doors, a potentially devastating outcome for millions of poor Americans that was repeatedly predicted ahead of time.
The advocacy group Public Citizen released a report Monday identifying 446 hospitals that could be forced to reduce services or close because of the Trump-GOP Medicaid cuts, which will amount to around $1 trillion over the next decade. The at-risk hospitals collectively served 7 million patients in 2024, according to Public Citizen’s analysis.
Nearly 200 of the hospitals listed in Public Citizen’s report are located in congressional districts represented by Republicans who voted for the Medicaid cuts, and 146 are in states represented by Senate Republicans—nearly all of whom supported the sprawling budget package that included the assault on Medicaid.
“Trump’s cuts to Medicaid will hurt millions of low-income and disabled Americans, and will deepen financial strains that are already plaguing rural and safety-net hospitals—compromising their ability to deliver care, potentially leading many to close,” said Public Citizen researcher Eileen O’Grady, the author of the report. “Congress should take urgent action to restore all Medicaid funding cuts enacted by Trump and Republicans in Congress, and should extend the enhanced premium tax credits for coverage through the Affordable Care Act marketplaces.”
The report comes as Republicans are reportedly considering billions of dollars in additional healthcare cuts—and kicking hundreds of thousands more off their health coverage—to help fund Trump’s illegal and increasingly expensive war on Iran.
Public Citizen found in its report that there’s at least one hospital at risk of closing or slashing services in 44 states and Washington, DC. States with the highest proportion of at-risk hospitals are Connecticut, California, New York, Massachusetts, and Washington, the analysis shows.
“It is notable that while there are more at-risk hospitals in Democrat-led states and congressional districts, a substantial number of hospitals in Republican-led states and congressional districts are threatened by Medicaid cuts,” the report observes. “Almost all congressional Republicans voted to pass the Big Ugly Law.”
Peer-Reviewed Health Study Warns of Trump’s ‘Silent But Deadly Assault’ on Health of Americans
“This is not just a policy shift—it’s a wholesale abandonment of government commitments to the American public,” said one advocate.
Kentucky Utilities Ghent Generating Station, a coal-fired power plant, is seen on February 14, 2026 in Ghent, Kentucky. (Photo by Jon Cherry/Getty Images)
The so-called “Make America Healthy Again” movement encapsulated a key campaign promise ahead of President Donald Trump’s second term in office, with Trump telling one Pennsylvania crowd in 2024, “We’re going to get toxic chemicals out of our environment, and we’re going to get them out of our food supply.”
But the Trump administration has gradually announced a slew of public health-related policies and proposals since the president took office—pushing to loosen emissions rules for the cancer-causing gas ethylene oxide; suggesting the polio vaccine should be optional; and mandating the production of carcinogenic glyphosate—and a peer-reviewed study has now cataloged the “grave threat to America’s health” that Trump’s policies present.
“During the first administration of President Donald Trump, nearly 100 environmental and occupational protections, including air-quality safeguards, were rescinded,” reads the study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) on March 25. “Although many of those rescissions were delayed by litigation or reversed by President Joe Biden, they inflicted considerable harm on Americans’ health. The second Trump administration’s actions have been even more aggressive, portending greater harm.”
Weeks after the US Senate confirmed Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy in February 2025—a confirmation that he secured after making the baseless claim that Americans would prefer the for-profit insurance system over universal healthcare and refusing to reject debunked claims about vaccines—the administration appeared to make clear its true views on public health when it announced 31 climate regulation rollbacks.
“Those initiatives and other administration actions are set to reverse progress on pollution, make workplaces more dangerous, and (in Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin’s words) drive ‘a dagger straight into the heart of the climate changereligion,’” reads the study.
The proposals swiftly introduced by the administration included:Loosening standards for particulate matter 2.5 pollution, which killed approximately 460,000 people in the US from 1999 to 2020; Ending subsidies for clean energy production under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act; Weakening tailpipe emissions standards, putting Americans at greater risk for cardiopulmonary mortality and climate crisis risks; and Delaying implementation of stronger silica rules for coal miners—putting them at risk for black lung disease—while also demanding that coal plants continue production.
Ken Cook, co-founder of the Environmental Working Group (EWG), said the study described “a deliberate dismantling of safeguards that protect the air, water, and health of nearly every person in this country—all in the service of polluters.”
“This is not just a policy shift—it’s a wholesale abandonment of government commitments to the American public and the MAHA movement that helped propel Trump into office,” said Cook, who did not contribute to the study.
Philip Landrigan, a pediatrician and public health physician who directs the Global Observatory on Planetary Health at Boston College and is the lead author of the paper, told EWG that the “impacts of these rollbacks will fall most heavily on the most vulnerable among us—including infants—resulting in brain injury, neurodevelopmental disorders, increased preterm births, and elevated lifelong risk of chronic disease.”
Children and other vulnerable populations, including those in low-income communities situated close to petrochemical industrial areas, are likely to have increased mercury, benzene, and arsenic exposures—raising their risk of developing cancers and other diseases—due to the Trump administration’s rollbacks, according to the study.
“Several proposed policies would weaken water-quality standards, reducing drinking-water safety for millions of people,” reads the paper. “For example, the EPA seeks to weaken regulations governing effluent discharges from coal-fired power plants. The resulting increase in waterborne lead, mercury, and arsenic will increase the incidence of bladder cancers and adversely affect children’s cognitive function.”
The study’s authors emphasized that “statistics and documentation are not enough” to protect the public from the White House’s harmfiul policies.
“Unless health professionals speak up, and unless we put a human face on the tragic consequences of these environmental rollbacks, the connection between these seemingly abstract policy changes and the real health harms they cause may remain invisible,” reads the study. “We health professionals must call urgent attention to this silent but deadly assault on Americans’ health, work with broad coalitions to halt it, and ultimately rebuild the agencies, protections, and shared sense of trust and responsibility that have given us clean air and water and enabled us and our children to live longer, healthier lives.”
Cook noted that the NEJM itself has been a target of the administration, with Kennedy calling highly respected, science-based journals “corrupt” and the Department of Justice questioning the publication’s editorial integrity.
“No amount of political pressure or intimidation should silence independent science or the experts working to protect public health,” Cook said. “The NEJM and the study’s authors rightly ignore those threats and lay bare the real-world consequences of the Trump administration’s actions—and the American people deserve to hear it.”
