Saturday, April 04, 2026

How a Russian influence network is spreading anti-Ukrainian propaganda in Ivory Coast


The Company – a network of Russian agents specialised in disinformation operations – has been carrying out a vast propaganda campaign against the Ukrainian embassy in Ivory Coast. When the pan-African media outlet The Continent received a trove of leaked documents about this operation, the FRANCE 24 Observers team joined forces with a consortium of international journalists to investigate the inner workings of this network.


Issued on: 03/04/2026 
The FRANCE 24 Observers/Quang Pham

The FRANCE 24 Observers team and our partners were able to analyse 76 leaked documents from early 2024 describing how the Russian network The Company carried out one of its operations. © Documents from The Company, The Continent.



Ghanaian news site Ghana Web published an article on July 12, 2024 that sparked controversy in Ivory Coast. As a segment of the Ivorian public opinion looks to distance itself from the Russia-Ukraine war, the article claimed that Ukraine was trying to recruit Ivorian citizens for the Ukrainian armed forces. The article, written under what appears to be a pseudonym, claims that recruitment posters were spotted in the streets of the Ivorian capital, Abidjan. These posters, coloured yellow and blue like the Ukrainian flag, were said to lay out a lucrative offer: the Ukrainian army would offer Ivorian volunteers a $3,000 bonus and “European residency” if they signed up to fight in the conflict.


Ghana Web published an image of a fake Ukrainian army recruitment flyer in an article posted online on July 12, 2024. The Ukrainian Embassy in Abidjan confirmed that this document is fake. © GhanaWeb

It turns out, however, that these flyers were not created by the Ukrainian authorities, whose identity was stolen. When we contacted the Ukrainian Embassy, they formally denied any connection to the flyers.

“Since we opened in April 2024, the Ukrainian Embassy has not carried out any such activity. The Embassy does not recruit [army volunteers]: an activity like this does not fall under its auspices. As a result, the Ukrainian Embassy cannot be behind the printing or the ordering of these materials,” said the Ukrainian Embassy in Abidjan.

Moreover, ​​it remains to be verified whether these posters actually appeared on the streets of Abidjan. The Ukrainian Embassy said that it had not seen them.

Our team worked with a consortium of investigative media outlets, including The Continent, Forbidden Stories, All Eyes On Wagner and RFI, to investigate this fake news story targeting Ukraine and Ivory Coast. We determined that it was seeded by a shadowy network known as the Company that is tasked with carrying out pro-Russian disinformation operations.

Our investigation focused on 76 leaked internal Company documents, shared anonymously with the team at the pan-African media outlet The Continent.

The Company was initially run by Yevgeny Prigozhin, the founder of private military organisation the Wagner Group. After Prigozhin was killed in a plane crash in August 2023, the disinformation network slowly came under the auspices of Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service or SVR. The network appears to be made up of around 90 specialists who organise influence operations in nearly 30 countries in Africa and Latin America. The organisation is headquartered in St. Petersburg.

The leaked documents – which include financial reports, documents detailing global strategy, operational plans for disinformation campaigns and even invoices – offer a detailed vision into the inner workings of the Company.

Why Ivory Coast is seen as ‘a promising country’ for The Company’s operations

In a 2023 document, the Company lays out an influence campaign aimed at the entire African continent – what it calls its “Africa Project”. Its stated aim is to provide support to “political leaders loyal to Russia”, to work against Western influence and protect Moscow’s interests.

This is a 2023 map from the Company’s Africa Project. The dark grey indicates countries where the Company is already running influence operations. The light grey indicates what the Company views as “promising countries” for launching operations. © The Continent, documents from the Company.

The Company began its operations in the Central African Republic in 2018 and in the countries that are part of the Alliance of Sahel States (AES), which – since 2023 – has included Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger. As part of its expansion strategy, the Ivory Coast is listed as a “promising country in which to launch operations”, as indicated by a map of Africa that was part of these documents.

The Company clearly has designs on Ivory Coast, which it believes is part of the “sphere of Western influence". The Company’s stated aim is to shift public opinion in Ivory Coast by discrediting French and American influence. The organisation also criticises the international diplomatic position that Ivory Coast has taken, saying that it sides with the European Union “on all international resolutions concerning the Ukrainian question".
This is an excerpt from the Company’s country file on the Ivory Coast, written up as part of its Africa Project. The document is from 2023. © The Continent, documents from the Company.

Attempts to discredit Ukraine in Ivory Coast

Ukraine appears as one of the Company’s primary targets. Between May and September 2024, Russia carried out four operations targeting Ivory Coast on social media and in traditional media outlets – both influence operations designed to promote pro-Russian narratives and disinformation campaigns aimed at spreading fake news. Three explicitly targeted the Ukrainian Embassy.

“Since it was created in April 2024, the Ukrainian Embassy has regularly been the target of these attacks. The first campaign began in May 2024 – less than a month after it opened,” the Ukrainian Embassy in Abidjan said.

According to this internal document from 2024, the Company launched four influence operations or operations aimed at spreading disinformation in the Ivory Coast between May and September 2024. © Company documents, The Continent.

In May 2024, the fake news story about the Ukrainian Embassy’s alleged drive to recruit Ivorian soldiers started to spread on social media. An image of a fake recruitment ad was also widely circulated on Facebook. The Ukrainian Embassy has denied that it is behind its creation. This disinformation campaign continued in July 2024 with the publication of the Ghanaweb article claiming that the Ukrainian Embassy’s recruitment flyers had been spotted in the streets of Abidjan. In that case, the Ukrainian chancellery denied that they were behind these posters and added that they had seen no sign of them in Abidjan.


The Ukrainian Embassy denounced on May 29, 2024, the publication of fake recruitment posters. Source: Facebook

In September 2024, the photo of a fake invitation to a cultural event supposedly organised by the Ukrainian Embassy in Abidjan was widely circulated on Facebook and WhatsApp. The event was portrayed on Ivorian social media as an attempt to enlist African citizens in the conflict in Europe. The Ukrainian Embassy also formally denied the authenticity of the document.

On September 3, 2024, the Ukrainian Embassy denounced the publication of a fake flyer about a fake musical event. Source: Facebook

A campaign to place articles in the media

Along with the sharing of misleading content on social media, the Company also financed the placement and publication of news articles in African media outlets that reflect its language of propaganda. The documents that we obtained detail what is called Project Magadan, an influence campaign originally launched by Prigozhin’s teams. As part of this project, the Company organised the publication of 49 articles aimed at Ivorians in 22 media outlets between May and October 2024. One Ivorian media outlet was also used for the publication of 14 articles targeting other African nations.

The organisation says that it spent $39,800 USD (around 34,430 euros) to get these articles published or roughly $631 dollars (or 545 euros) per article. While the Company might have directly paid some journalists and media outlets, it also functioned more discreetly and in a more concealed manner.

The Ghanaweb article about the fake recruitment campaign supposedly being carried out by the Ukrainian Embassy in the Ivory Coast wasn’t written by journalists with the Ghanaian news site, as is made clear in the warning on the article. It was published in a paying space reserved for promotional content – for which GhanaWeb charges a fee of $250 USD (215 euros) – or outside contributors. Our team contacted Ghanaweb to ask about the publication of this article in particular, but they had not responded to our questions at the time of publication.

However, the Company’s financial documents indicated that they spent $700 USD on the publication of the Ghanaweb article.

According to the Company’s financial report, the organisation paid $700 USD for the publication of the Ghanaweb article about the fake army recruitment drive supposedly being carried out by the Ukrainian Army in the Ivory Coast. © The Continent, documents from the Company.

Free articles sent to newsrooms

The Company also appears to have developed another model for getting articles placed: providing free articles to newsrooms.

A recognised Ivorian media outlet published 18 articles sent to them by the Company between May and October 2024. The documents say that the Company spent $10,200 on these articles.

The journalist from the Ivorian media outlet who published these articles – who spoke to our team on condition of anonymity – told our team that he had no idea that they had been written by a Russian intelligence service. He further said that he was not paid for their publication:


“At my level, I didn’t receive the sums that you are talking about. Perhaps an intermediary received this money, but I often published these articles in good faith without wanting to participate in Russian propaganda and even less so in a campaign that was anti-Western or anti-French.

By the way, I didn’t publish all the articles that they sent my way. Especially when the information they contained was hard to verify.”

The journalist explained that the articles attributed to the Company were not written by journalists on his team but by “special correspondents”, which is noted in the signature of the authors of these 18 articles. This title refers to outside contributors who write on a voluntary, unpaid basis for the publication.

“They are authors who want to write for us about an event, for example. They send us pitches, which we edit. They are not paid. But I do not personally know these authors. All of them introduced these articles through an intermediary who supplies content. Maybe these authors deal with him [about payment],” said the Ivorian journalist.

Marc-André Boisvert, an analyst with communications and digital services company Cronos Europe, explains how these free articles were used in certain Ivorian media outlets.

“In Ivory Coast, some newspapers are dedicated to the promotion of one politician in particular. Once they’ve promoted the politician they support, they will take pretty much any other articles to fill their pages. That’s where these disinformation networks work well in Ivory Coast. They often send these newspapers free articles.”

While not all of the articles by unpaid contributors are misleading, this practice is easy to abuse.

Even though independent contributors are not paid by the media outlets that publish their articles, they are often paid by outside sources for placing articles promoting certain topics or figures. We delve into the media outlets used by the Company in the second part of our investigation.

Polarising debates


One of these articles written by one of these so-called correspondents, published on September 4, 2024, was about a fake musical event being organised by the Ukrainian Embassy in Abidjan. The article claimed that the organisation of this (fake) event angered some social media users, who saw it as foreign interference.

While the spreading of this rumour was a disinformation operation launched by the Company – as indicated in its internal documents –, the article seemed to spark real concern among some Ivorian social media users about the war between Russia and Ukraine.

“The feeling – I wouldn’t say dominant but often expressed by Ivorians on social media – is captured in this article. People want to distance themselves from this war,” said the Ivorian journalist who published this article. We also spoke to Boisvert, who warned that it was important not to exaggerate the amount of time that most Ivorians spend thinking about Ukraine.

Not all of the Company’s publications feature flagrant disinformation – often, they promote pro-Russian or pro-AES narratives. They also aim to polarise debates within the Ivorian population, which is already fertile ground for divisions. Mohamed Kebe, an Ivorian journalist and factchecker, explains:

“Ivory Coast is divided politically. When you are part of the opposition, you are likely to criticise anything that those in power do, whether good or bad. Similarly, those on the side of the government often reject any position held by the opposition.

The result is that, today, there are narratives fed by one part of the population. Because some don’t like the government, they might connect more with pro-Russian content, especially content shared by pro-AES accounts, and then share it.”

‘Sort of botched’ campaigns

So, how effective are these campaigns aimed at discrediting Ukraine in Ivory Coast?

The experts we interviewed had mixed feelings. For example, Ivorian journalist Mohamed Kebe said that there was “a lot of noise” on social media about the fake news story about the Ukrainian Embassy trying to recruit Ivorians.

In the leaked internal documents, the Company also brags about carrying out disinformation campaigns in the real world, not just on social media and in media outlets – like hanging up the fake recruitment posters in the streets of Abidjan. However, as for the actions supposedly carried out in the real world – as it remains to be seen if they actually were carried out – they seem to have had a very limited effect.

“I didn’t see any of these flyers in Abidjan,” said Mohamed Kebe. The Ukrainian Embassy in Abidjan also said that they had not seen the flyers in the streets of the Ivorian economic capital.

For his part, expert Boisvert says that the disinformation campaigns about Ukraine carried out in Ivory Coast provoked “very little reaction” and had no significant impact on Ivorian opinion.

“The attacks on the meeting between President Alassane Ouattara and [Ukrainian President Volodymyr] Zelensky [in June 2024] were shared, but without any real political impact.

Increasingly, we feel like these campaigns are not specifically targeting Ivorians. They seem, more like an attempt to try and convince an outside public – like AES countries – that the Ivorian government is on the wrong path and too aligned with the West. Often, there seems to be underlying narratives about French conspiracies [Editor’s note: against AES nations].

Ivorians are more immune to these kinds of campaigns, which are sometimes sort of botched.”

This article has been translated from the original in French by Brenna Daldorph.


INVESTIGATION

Leaked files reveal Russia's blueprint to expand African Sahel alliance

Russian-linked consultants worked to strengthen and widen a pro-Moscow alliance in the Sahel region, using media campaigns, political pressure and cultural events to influence governments and public opinion, according to leaked internal documents seen by RFI and its partners.



Issued on: 03/04/2026 - RFI

An investigation from the “Propaganda Machine” series examines how a Russian-linked network sought to strengthen and expand a pro-Moscow alliance in the Sahel. © Studio FMM

The leaked files form part of the “Propaganda Machine” investigation, led by the pan-African media organisation The Continent and the journalism network Forbidden Stories, of which RFI is a member.

The investigation is based on more than 1,400 pages of internal records from a group known as Africa Politology, set up by Yevgeny Prigozhin, founder of the Russian paramilitary group Wagner, which operated in several African countries.

Africa Politology was later taken over by Russian foreign intelligence services, after the Wagner Group was dismantle following a failed mutiny attempt and the death of Prigozhin in 2023.

The documents show how the group aimed to reinforce the Alliance of Sahel States (AES) between Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger and extend the alliance to neighbouring countries, while promoting Russian interests across the region.

It also set out a broader strategy to weaken Western influence, secure new economic opportunities and gain support at the United Nations.

The files identify the Sahel as a key focus of Russia’s return to Africa, alongside the Central African Republic, where Russia provides security support, has access to natural resources and promotes anti-Western messages.

Propaganda Machine: Inside Russia's drive to shift Chad from Western influence


Shaping a pro-Russia bloc

In an August 2023 report titled “Global South”, strategists from Africa Politology called for a “confederation of independence” to counter what they described as a Western-built “belt of instability”.

They said the aim was to reshape a vast region stretching from Senegal and Guinea to Sudan and Eritrea. This vision developed alongside the emergence of the AES.

Military coups in Mali in May 2021, in Burkina Faso in September 2022 and in Niger in July 2023 opened the way for closer ties with Moscow, as French troops withdrew from counter-terrorism operations in the region.

The documents present this as a narrative of sovereignty – portraying jihadist groups, political opposition and critical civil society as internal threats backed by Western powers and their regional allies.

The objectives set out in the files closely match those of Russia, including weakening the West’s image as a reliable security partner and disrupting US military logistics across Africa.

They also aim to open new markets for hydrocarbons, weapons and agricultural products, and to secure diplomatic support.

Internal budgets reveal spending on communication campaigns, including $51,300 in Niger in May 2024 and $64,500 in September. Hundreds of sponsored articles and social media posts are listed, each linked to payments of several hundred dollars.

Africa Politology consultants also claimed credit for political developments, incasing the creation of the AES.

“A large information campaign was launched in the media and on social networks. The result of these actions was the agreement of the leaders of the three countries to sign a memorandum creating the Confederation of Sahel States,” they wrote.

That confederation was formalised at a summit in July 2024 between Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger.
Internal documents show budget lines detailing spending on communication campaigns in each country targeted by the network. © Capture d'écran

Pressure and influence in Niger

In Niger, the documents describe efforts in 2024 to strengthen the military government and cut ties with the United States.

The consultants said they played a role in disrupting contacts with Washington. “Under the influence of the company’s contractors, negotiations with the American delegation were hindered in March 2024,” they wrote.

They added that Abdourahamane Tiani refused to meet a visiting US delegation, while protests saw American flags burned.

According to the files, more than a dozen meetings took place with senior figures in the regime.

Alongside political actions, cultural and social initiatives were used to build influence. These included opening a Russian cultural centre in Niamey in June 2024, organising a motorbike rally with more than 300 participants for “Russia Day”, and holding football tournaments and other sports and cultural events.

The documents also describe efforts to push Niger out of the CFA franc, a regional currency used in several West African countries, and promote a unified banking system across AES countries, with a roadmap said to have been presented to the three governments.

The documents recommend linking sabotage attacks by the Patriotic Liberation Front – an armed group in Niger – to France, as well as tensions with Benin, and promoting claims that “France trains terrorists to invade Niger”, a narrative later repeated by the authorities.

“The result of our campaigns allows for greater cohesion between citizens of the three countries,” the consultants wrote.

How Moscow is reinventing its influence machine across Africa

Mali driving the message

Mali is described as “the driving force of the anti-Western movement in the Sahel”, with the Africa Politology group claiming to support that role.

A work plan for May and June 2024 included an objective to “block the work of religious figures whose actions aim to weaken the established order”.

The same documents say regulations on religious organisations were tightened and that the Coordination of Movements, Associations and Supporters, known as CMAS, a movement linked to influential imam Mahmoud Dicko, was dissolved in March 2024.

Dicko had helped mobilise protests before the 2020 overthrow of president Ibrahim Boubakar Keïta but later fell out with the authorities and went into exile. The documents describe him as a “jihadist imam”.

Africa Politology also claimed to have led campaigns against foreign mining companies. Campaigns also targeted Orano and GoviEx, two foreign companies mining uranium in Niger.

“A vast information campaign was conducted to discredit foreign companies that own mines. Demonstrations in favour of the nationalisation of extractive industries were organised,” the documents state.

However, a specialist described this as an exaggeration, noting that changes to mining rules were driven by other actors and that disputes were often resolved through negotiation.

The files also highlight a youth forum held in Bamako in September 2024 to mark the first anniversary of the Liptako-Gourma Charter, the mutual defence pact that came before the confederation. Delegations from Senegal, Guinea and Chad attended.
Internal documents outline Russian influence strategies in Mali (left) and Niger (right). © Screen grab


Ousmane Sonko Junior, a member of the Patriotic Youth of Senegal, a group linked to the ruling Pastef party, told Forbidden Stories he was surprised by the conclusions.

“The round tables were supposed to be about youth political engagement, growth and so on. When the conclusions came, we saw topics in the minutes that we had not discussed,” Sonko said, adding he refused to sign the document despite pressure.

“Our position as young members of Pastef is African integration and unity. We do not interfere in AES politics or alliances, but we refuse to be drawn into cooperation where we would submit to one foreign power or another."

Participants later learned their travel had been funded by the Russian House in Bamako, and reported the presence of two men conducting interviews, Maksim Kovaliev and Nikolay Laktionov, identified in the documents as Africa Politology employees.

Former Wagner media operative lifts the lid on Russian disinformation in CAR


Anti-Ukraine narratives


The leaked Africa Politology documents also detail a $3,000 campaign against Ukraine, described as “a country supporting terrorists in Africa”.

The campaign coincided with Mali cutting ties with Kyiv on 4 August, 2024, after comments by a Ukrainian military intelligence spokesman suggesting Ukraine had shared information with northern Mali rebels involved in an attack near Tinzaouatène the previous week.

The attack was devastating for the Russian mercenaries backing the Malian army, with several dozen killed.

The documents said they organised a conference in Dakar in October 2024 with Guinean singer Élie Kamano.

“I want to make my voice heard through this tour, to encourage AES member countries in their drive to establish the true foundations of African unity and to fight these terrorist groups financed by French and Ukrainian lobbies,” Kamano said.

The files say the conference cost $12,000 and that his remarks were repeated in 43 media articles.

Kamano confirmed to RFI that he made the comments but denied receiving any payment. “My fight in engaged music did not start yesterday. I give conferences wherever I go, in Dakar and elsewhere, and I am not concerned by your claims, not in any way."

He did not explain how the Dakar event was organised or the conditions of his wider AES tour, during which he filmed several clips praising the military governments allied to Moscow.

Kamano, who lives in exile in France, also said four members of his family, including two of his children, were abducted in Conakry in late November 2025 and blamed the Guinean authorities.

Satigui Sidibé, founder of the Malian news site Bamada.net, told RFI's sister TV channel France 24 he had not received any payment to publish related articles and had no contact with any Russian entity.

Screenshot of an article on Bamada.net reporting on Élie Kamano’s statements about Ukraine during a pan-African tour. © Capture d'écran

Targets beyond the Sahel


Expanding the AES was a central objective, with Chad identified as the main priority and several other countries also targeted.

In Guinea, Africa Politology consultants said they were approached in 2019 by allies of then-president Alpha Condé. After his overthrow in 2021, they described the new authorities as a target for “reorientation towards Russia and the AES”.

Frustrated by limited progress, they said they launched a campaign portraying the leadership as a “puppet of France”.

Political analyst Kabinet Fofana told RFI that Guinea had little reason to join the bloc. “The opposition and civil society supported the coup at the start, so Guinea had nothing to gain in an AES-type approach,” he said.

“We did not have the same political, social or security context, and France was quite cautious.”

The documents also mention efforts to influence Senegal’s leaders, President Bassirou Diomaye Faye and Prime Minister Ousmane Sonko. “The priority objective is to correct diplomatic positioning towards a sovereignist path, facilitating rapprochement with the AES,” the documents said.

Four campaigns launched between May and September 2024 pushed for closer ties with the AES, the departure of French troops and the expulsion of the Ukrainian ambassador. One campaign reportedly reached more than 8 million people.

Togo was identified as another key target, particularly its port of Lomé, described in the documents as a vital logistics hub. They say 35 campaigns were carried out between February and April 2024 to influence the country’s geopolitical direction.

The campaigns coincided with legislative elections held in a tense climate, alongside constitutional changes allowing Faure Gnassingbé to remain in power as president of the Council of Ministers. The campaigns accused the US of destabilising the country and the opposition of being backed by foreign actors under the pretext of restoring democracy.

The plans also involved cooperation in phosphate mining and security operations against terrorism and piracy in the Gulf of Guinea.

Togo later signed a defence agreement with Moscow and Gnassingbé travelled to Russia. In early March 2026, he discreetly received the Russian defence minister, according to specialist media.

A recent deserter from the Africa Corps, the paramilitary group linked to the Russian defence ministry, also described Togo as the group’s “new destination”.

Posts on Telegram channels linked to Russian authorities, including the widely followed Rybar account, a pro-Russian channel, raised the question: “Why do we need Togo?”

Benin and Côte d’Ivoire are also cited as future targets. The documents say contacts were made in July 2024 with figures close to former Ivorian president Laurent Gbagbo’s party and with former prime minister Guillaume Soro, now based in the AES.

A leaked internal document titled “The geopolitical situation in Togo”. © Screen grab

Impact unclear

Despite the scale of the operations described, their real impact remains unclear.

“These documents are full of bold claims about their achievements,” said Lou Osborne of All Eyes On Wagner, a partner in the investigative consortium.

“They do not show a deep understanding of local dynamics, and sometimes the same strategies are applied across different countries without adapting to local realities,” she said.

Osborne added that while the work may appear successful from Moscow, “the reality on the ground is much more nuanced and requires the action of a multitude of local actors”.

The documents also suggest that promotion of Russia as a security partner may be weakening, as the US increases its engagement in the region.

This article has been adapted from the original version in French by François Mazet


 More Than 23,000 People Evacuated From War Zone In Ukraine Four Years Ago Remain In Temporary Housing In Russia – OpEd


By 

After Putin launched his expanded invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Russian forces evacuated many residents from the war zone and placed them in what are known as “temporary accommodation centers.” Now, four years later, officials concede, there are more than 23,000 people in these places (tass.ru/obschestvo/26461721). 

Initially, these people were put in municipal hotels and sanatoria in small cities far from Moscow; but over time, most of those in such places have been moved to “old peoples’ homes” and that has become the name that both those living there and those they live among now use to refer to their locations (cherta.media/story/bezhency-v-rossii-pvr-i-pomoshh/).

Never lavishly provided with food and services and often living crowded together in single rooms, the “temporarily” evacuated are at least alive for which they are grateful but increasingly have been provided with a narrower range of food products and some of them would like to return to their homes, moves the authorities have generally blocked.

Because their numbers are small and because they have been put in places few tourists, Western journalists or diplomats are likely to visit, these people have received far less attention than other groups. That makes the compilation of some of the personal tragedies by the Cherta news portal especially valuable.

What will happen to these people in the future remains unclear, and the uncertainty they feel about that defines their lives even more than the shortages and the lack of contact with their families and friends in former homes. Presumably if there is a settlement, some of these people will be able to return home, but even that is uncertain, as the “temporarily” housed admit. 

Ukrainian children taken at gunpoint by Russian forces in Kherson, documents show

Children play in a backyard in the liberated village of Kyselivka, 15 November, 2022
Copyright AP Photo

By Sasha Vakulina
Published on Euronews 


Euronews obtained a copy of one of the documented episodes of Russia's systemic abduction and forceful deportation of Ukrainian children from temporarily occupied territories.

Ukraine's Prosecutor General filed charges against a serviceman of the Russian Armed Forces who organised and personally participated in the unlawful transfer to Russia of 15 Ukrainian children.

According to official documents seen by Euronews, the case concerns events in the village of Novopetrivka in the Kherson region during Russia's occupation between March and November 2022.

The children were in the care of the local school's director, who, together with her husband, tried to "ensure their safety and proper living conditions."

Ten of the children lived with no parental care, three were orphans and two others were living in what was only described as difficult circumstances.

The accused Russian soldier together with other servicemen, arrived at the school threatening people with weapons, according to the documents seen by Euronews.

The director was interrogated, and in order to prevent any departure, three armed soldiers were left at the school.

Empty cribs at a playhouse in the courtyard of Kherson regional children's home in Kherson, 25 November, 2022
Empty cribs at a playhouse in the courtyard of Kherson regional children's home in Kherson, 25 November, 2022 AP Photo

Ukraine's Prosecutor General says that the next day, the accused Russian serviceman personally organised the forcible removal of the children.

Escorted by around 20 armed servicemen, the children, as well as the school director and her husband, were transported to the settlement of Stepanivka, deeper inside Kherson.

They were held there for about three months.

Forceful transfer to Russia

On 19 October 2022, shortly before Ukrainian forces liberated part of the Kherson region, the Ukrainian children were moved even further away.

First, they were taken by boat across the Dnipro River to Oleshky, a town which still remains occupied, on the left bank of Kherson region.

From there they were taken by bus to Armyansk in northern Crimea and then by train from Dzhankoi, Crimea to Anapa in Russia's Krasnodar Krai.

This is where the children were placed in a child care institution.

According to court papers, the children were forced to sing the Russian national anthem, participate in propaganda events and were forbidden from speaking Ukrainian.

"All of this was accompanied by constant psychological pressure," the documents said.

Ukrainian children from an orphanage in the Donetsk region at a camp in Zolotaya Kosa, 8 July, 2022
Ukrainian children from an orphanage in the Donetsk region at a camp in Zolotaya Kosa, 8 July, 2022 AP Photo

The investigation established that there were no grounds for the so-called evacuation. The school had food supplies, medicines and shelter and there were no active hostilities nearby.

Maksym Maksymov, head of projects at Bring Kids Back Ukraine told Euronews the case highlights how Russia is systematically carrying out the forced deportation of Ukrainian children.

"There was no justification for their transfer from Novopetrivka to Russia. The children were not in danger, they had shelter, food, and care. What happened instead was a deliberate operation, with a clear chain of actions from surveillance and control to forced transfer and deportation, alongside efforts to erase their identity," he said.

Euronews has previously reported cases of Ukrainian children who endured abuse, beatings, confinement in basements and threats of being sent to psychiatric hospitals for disobedience.

Who is charged?

According to the court case, the organiser of the crime has been identified and is charged with violating the laws and customs of war, committed by a group of persons in prior conspiracy as per the Criminal Code of Ukraine.

Commenting on the case, Deputy Prosecutor General Viktor Lohachov said that this is one of the documented episodes of the systematic practice of unlawfully transferring and deporting Ukrainian children from temporarily occupied territories.

"We are talking not only about 15 children from one specific locality. According to the information currently available, data on more than 19,000 children are being verified and this figure is not final," Lohachov said.

According to him, this criminal proceeding has established the full chain of actions: from controlling the children under occupation to their forced removal, further transfer through occupied territories, and deportation to the Russian Federation.

The regional administration building damaged by Russia's constant shelling on the main square in the frontline city of Kherson, 3 November, 2025
The regional administration building damaged by Russia's constant shelling on the main square in the frontline city of Kherson, 3 November, 2025 AP Photo

According to Ukraine's Prosecutor General, these were "organised actions by servicemen of the aggressor state, carried out with the use of weapons, coercion, and full control over the children."

"Prosecutors are documenting every such case and building the evidence base both for national courts and for international institutions."

The accused face between eight and 12 years in prison.

The pre-trial investigation was conducted by investigators of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU).

Maksymov told Euronews what is important about this case is that it allows Ukraine "to identify not just the crime, but the individual responsible for organising and carrying it out."

"That is how accountability is built and every person involved must face justice."

Ukrainian teenager Bohdan Yermokhin holds the Ukraine flag upon his return after forceful deportation to Russia, 19 November, 2023
Ukrainian teenager Bohdan Yermokhin holds the Ukraine flag upon his return after forceful deportation to Russia, 19 November, 2023 AP/Ukrainian Presidential Press Office

Efforts to bring abduected children back to Ukraine

All 15 children in this case were successfully returned to Ukraine but tens of thousands remain in Russia.

To date, Ukraine has managed to bring back around 2,000 children of the at least 20,000 forcefully deported by Russia.

For Ukraine and the President of Ukraine's Bring Kids Back UA initiative it can take years to return one child from Russia after abduction, from the beginning of the identification until the return happens.

Almost every return is mediated by a third state, notably Qatar, South Africa and the Vatican.

On Thursday the White House announced that US First Lady Melania Trump has for the fourth time helped secure the return of abducted Ukrainian children to their families.

US First lady Melania Trump attends an event at the White House, 25 March, 2026
US First lady Melania Trump attends an event at the White House, 25 March, 2026 AP Photo

Maksymov told Euronews as with the returns, Kyiv is also seeking international support in its investigations.

"Ukraine is working with international partners to bring every deported child home and to document these crimes for both national and international justice. The scale of these violations goes far beyond a single case, which is why sustained cooperation is essential," he said.

In March, the United Nations said that the deportation and forcible transfer of Ukrainian children to Russia constitutes a crime against humanity and a war crime.

A new report by the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine said Russian authorities "at the highest level" have deported "thousands" of children from occupied areas of Ukraine.

Vladimir Putin's "direct involvement" has been "visible form the outset," it adds.

Ukraine says almost 20,000 children have been illegally sent to Russia.

Yale's Humanitarian Research Lab placed the number of deported Ukrainian children closer to 35,000 while Moscow claimed the number could reach as high as 700,000

The US-based Institute for the Study of War (ISW) think tank insists that the true number of deported children is almost impossible to verify.



Semenya hits out at impact of Olympic ban on DSD athletes
DW
April 2, 2026

Caster Semenya has had her gender scrutinized in public for years after winning two Olympic golds. She has hit out at what she sees as a policy that disproportionately affects athletes with sexual differences.

Caster Semenya won Olympic gold in 2012 and 2016 but a rule change stopped her from competing in 2020
Image: Martin Rickett/empics/picture alliance

While the impact of last week's new "Policy on the Protection of the Female (women's) Category in Olympic Sport" has focused largely on trans athletes, medical experts and Olympians say the impact of the ban will be felt more keenly by those with Differences in Sexual Development (DSD).

New Zealander Laurel Hubbard is the only recorded trans athlete in Olympic history. The weightlifter failed to record a successful lift in the women's +87 kilograms weightlifting in the delayed 2020 Olympics and crashed out early.

South Africa's Caster Semenya was not at those Games in Tokyo to defend her 800 meters title from Rio in 2016 and London 2012 after falling foul of a tweaked World Athletics (then the IAAF) policy that female athletes must lower their testosterone levels below the prescribed 5 nmol/L threshold for at least six months before competition. Semenya refused.

Testosterone levels have long been the battleground for athletes who do not necessarily fit neatly in to either the male or female categories.
Trans and DSD athletes treated much the same in new policy

While the new IOC policy makes a "rare exception of athletes with a diagnosis of Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (CAIS) or other rare differences/disorders in sex development (DSDs) who do not benefit from the anabolic and/or performance-enhancing effects of testosterone" it has otherwise reverted to SRY testing, comprising a cheek swab, which it used in the 1990s. SRY tests for the presence of the SRY gene, which is found on the Y or "male" chromosome.

Semenya has labeled the decision a "disgrace" in an article published on Wednesday for Time magazine.

"Genetic screening is not, and never has been, a way to protect girls and women in sports. To call it that is to mask a monster. Let's call this what it is: exclusion, just with a different name. "

Under its previous boss, Thomas Bach, the IOC's position was that there was "no one-size-fits-all solution" to the issue of gender testing.

A 2023 report from a number of scientists around the world stated that "in athletic events and sports relying on endurance, muscle strength, speed, and power, men typically outperform women because of fundamental sex differences dictated by their sex chromosomes and sex hormones at puberty, in particular, testosterone."

Athletic advantage for trans women but DSD cases more complex

While trans athletes can broadly be accepted to have distinct advantages as a result, individual cases are far from black and white, particularly for athletes with DSD. The condition makes genes, hormones and reproductive organs, including genitals, naturally develop differently, whereas trans people have an identity which does not match their sex and may have surgery or treatment to reflect that.



Semenya and boxer Imane Khelif, who won gold at Paris 2024, both have DSD. Professor Alun Williams, a sports scientist at Manchester Metropolitan University, told the BBC that they, and others like them, are in danger of being marginalized by the change.

"There are real ethical problems about genetic testing of a large number of people – many of whom are younger than 18 – and revealing potentially life-changing information to them about their personal biology," he told the BBC.

"So, what we're doing now is going back to the 1990s, a system that was tried and abandoned, and it does try to reduce biological sex down to the presence of a single gene on the Y chromosome which is an over-simplification.

"While the direct evidence of physical advantage in transgender people is pretty strong, the evidence of advantage for those with DSD, even though they have a Y chromosome, is highly disputed."

Semenya feels failed by IOC chief Coventry

The IOC now mirrors World Athletics (WA) in its policies regarding the female category. After WA changed their rules last year, Semenya told DW she felt targeted.

"When you're born with your differences, those are your differences and they don't make you a great athlete," she said.

"You are a great athlete through training, hard work, showing up every day, dedication. Not because of your given body."

Khelif (right) won gold at Paris 2024 but was the subject of much debate
Image: Sebastian Kahnert/dpa/picture alliance

That decision was taken by WA chief Sebastian Coe, a double Olympic gold- medal-winning distance runner like Semenya. Like the new IOC chief, former Olympic swimmer Kirsty Coventry, Coe made the changes soon after taking charge. Coventry said her organization's policy was based on science and fairness.

"At the Olympic Games, even the smallest margins can be the difference between victory and defeat. So, it is absolutely clear that it would not be fair for biological males to compete in the female category. In addition, in some sports it would simply not be safe,” she said in a statement.

"Every athlete must be treated with dignity and respect, and athletes will need to be screened only once in their lifetime. There must be clear education around the process and counselling available, alongside expert medical advice."

Semenya, who was invited to give her perspective when the IOC were weighing up the ban, finds this difficult to take.

"Like me, IOC President Kirsty Coventry is a woman from Africa. I hoped she would be different," she wrote in Time. "Instead, she failed us."

Edited by: Chuck Penfold

Matt Pearson Reporter and editor

Trump seeks $1.5T for defense, 10% cut to domestic programs
DW with Reuters, AP and AFP
04.04.2026


The US budget proposals come as Washington faces rising costs from the Iran war and seeks to rebuild weapons stockpiles. The president said he also wants to cut back or eliminate "woke, weaponized and wasteful programs."




US President Donald Trump on Friday aimed to boost defense spending to $1.5 trillion (€1.3 trillion) in his 2027 budget proposal.

The request, which comes five weeks into the US-Israel war with Iran, would lift military spending by more than 40% in a single year — the steepest increase since World War II.

To partially offset the increase, Trump also proposed a 10% cut in non-defense spending, "reducing or eliminating woke, weaponized and wasteful programs, and by returning state and local responsibilities to their respective governments," the 92-page document said.

Though the president's annual budget proposals are nonbinding, they serve as an indication of the administration's priorities as lawmakers begin drafting legislation. It will ultimately be up to Congress to write and pass a federal budget.

What are some of Trump's other priorities?

The increased defense budget would cover Trump's controversial Golden Dome missile defense shield, a build-up of critical mineral supplies for the defense industry and $65.8 billion to build 34 new combat and support ships.

The president also requested a 13% increase in Justice Department spending to "maximize" its "capacity to bring violent criminals to justice."

His budget proposals seeks to maintain high spending ⁠for homeland security and immigration enforcement at $2.2 billion. The administration said that money will pay ​for US Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations, 41,500 detention beds, and 30,000 "family unit beds."

Also among the proposals is a $481 million increase in funding to enhance aviation safety and support hiring more air traffic controllers, and $152 million for Trump's idea to reopen Alcatraz as an active prison.

What are some of the proposed cuts?

Trump has targeted several major federal departments in his list of requested cuts, including a 19% ⁠decrease for the Agriculture Department, a 12.5% cut for the Health Department, and a 52% cut for the Environmental Protection Agency.


One of his proposals slashes more than $15 billion from the Biden-era bipartisan infrastructure law, including funds for renewable energy projects, and cuts funds to what the Trump administration calls "woke” environmental justice programs.

The president also seeks to cut $106 million in funding from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, which it says has "pushed radical gender ideology onto children."


He also requested scrapping nearly 30 Justice Department programs deemed to be "weaponized" against the American people, along with cutting the $315 million National Endowment for Democracy.

The White House also asked for a 23% decrease in funding for NASA, including a $3.6 billion cut to the agency's science unit.

What has the reaction been?

Democrats swiftly attacked the proposal, with Senator Jeff Merkley, the top Democrat on the Budget Committee, calling it "an out-of-touch plea for more money for ⁠guns and bombs, and ​less for the things people need, like housing, health care, education, roads, scientific research, and environmental protection."

Some Republicans backed the proposed military increase, saying it would help move US military spending toward 5% of GDP and ensure the country's military remains the most advanced in the world.

Roger Wicker and Mike Rogers, the respective chairmen of the Senate and House armed services committees, praised Trump in a joint statement for "sending a clear signal for our allies and partners to build on recent progress and meet this benchmark alongside us."

Edited by: Sean Sinico




'Drill baby drill': Trump opens wilderness to big energy
DW
04.04.2026


America's beloved national parks and public lands face conservation rollbacks and sell-offs as the Trump administration pushes for fossil fuel and timber extraction.


Yosemite National Park is a protected UNESCO World Heritage Site, but other public lands are facing increased exploitation
Image: robertharding/picture alliance


From the majestic valleys of the Grand Canyon to the granite peaks of the Yosemite National Park and ancient trees of Alaska's Tongass National Forest, US President Donald Trump has pledged to make America's federal nature reserves "beautiful again."

National parks make up one part of over 600 million acres (243 million hectares) of US public lands that span forests, deserts, waterways and wildlife refuges.

"These include some of the most ecologically intact and biodiverse lands in the country," said Jenny Rowland-Shea, who directs public lands policy at the Washington-based think tank, Center for American Progress.

But critics say these landscapes are threatened by steep budget cuts and environmental rollbacks that open them to resource extraction.

In May 2025, for example, the Trump administration proposed cutting nearly $1 billion (€860 million) from the National Park Service budget — a reduction that park advocates warn could force hundreds of sites to close or sharply scale back services.

For Rowland-Shea, the weakening of the National Park Service and its conservation mission "under the guise of 'government efficiency' has only made parks and public lands less safe, less clean, less accessible, and more crowded than ever before."


In April 2025, Trump signed an order that removed environmental and climate regulations restricting coal and energy production on federal lands
Image: Andrew Thomas/NurPhoto/picture alliance















Two months after announcing the cuts, Trump signed an executive order devoted to "improving" national parks. While lyrically invoking natural areas that have "inspired generations," it also called out "land-use restrictions" that have "stripped hunters, fishers, hikers, and outdoorsmen of access to public lands that belong to them."

But by casting nature conservation measures as impediments, there is a fear that Trump was flagging a bigger policy shift that opens more federally managed lands to mining, drilling and logging.


National parks remain hugely popular


Celebrated for preserving an iconic landscape, the national park network is often called "America's best idea." In 2024, the parks alone set a record with about 332 million visitors who spent roughly $29 billion in nearby communities.

A November 2025 YouGov poll showed that a strong majority (69%) of Americans oppose the Trump administration's proposed cuts to the National Park Service.

This was played out in the Senate in January when a bipartisan budget bill rejected those cuts. Still, park advocates cautioned that since language was removed from the bill ensuring that national parks remain public lands, they are now vulnerable to a potential sell-off.

"Protecting our national parks is a bipartisan issue," said Theresa Pierno, then-president of the National Parks Conservation Association (NPCA), which commissioned the poll, in a statement. "Nobody asked for reckless cuts to park staffing or the gutting of our shared heritage. Nobody wants this."

Millions of hectares opened to mining and logging

More than 40% of the total US public lands have long been subject to oil, gas, coal and mineral extraction, including the so-called federal mineral estate that produces 15% and 9% respectively of domestic oil and gas.

But Trump is now focused on "unleashing" more American energy on public lands by rolling back "ideologically motivated" regulations, including environmental and climate laws, as he said in an executive order in January 2025. This includes a proposal to end the 2024 Public Lands Rule, which the Biden administration instituted to equally balance resource extraction on these lands with conservation.


"Trump's actions are largely aimed at weakening protections," Rowland-Shea told DW. "The value of public lands is determined by their potential resource extraction and market value."

Citing the need for reducing "foreign dependence" on critical minerals, in March 2025 the Trump administration ordered a significant increase in domestic "mineral production" on federal lands. Large swaths have been identified for fast-tracked mining leases for "critical minerals" like copper, uranium and gold.

The administration has also opened up millions of acres of public land and water to oil drilling and coal mining to "secure reliable energy," while overturning a rule that prohibited logging and road construction to allow "responsible" timber production and "fire prevention."

Preserved public lands vital for 'disappearing wildlife'

And it's not entirely new. Back in 2017 when Trump took office for his first term, Stephen Nash, an environmental researcher at the University of Richmond in Virginia, described how the administration quickly removed millions of acres from protected public lands, and made them available for logging and mining.

These included Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments, and vast canyon complexes in southern Utah — though this was reversed by the Biden administration. Oil and gas leasing on public lands also tripled in less than a year.

In Trump's second term, Nash is concerned that, while landmark national parks are likely safe from major extraction projects, the "much larger portfolio of public lands" that includes national forests and wildlife preserves will be severely degraded.

"Those other public lands are even more crucial as habitat for our rapidly disappearing wildlife," Nash told DW, explaining that thousands of plant and animal species will need these lands as they migrate from extreme temperatures linked to planetary heating.


Reintroduced bison are helping to restore ecosystems at Yellowstone National Park
Image: IMAGO

Scientists have noted, for example, how the return of once-endangered American bison to national parks like Yellowstone are helping to restore ecosystems. And until recently, such parks also contributed to educating patrons about the impacts of climate disruption on the natural environment.

But echoing the deletion of the word climate from government websites, in February this year the Trump administration forced park service staff to remove or censor exhibits that share scientific knowledge about climate change.

Instead, the administration remains focused on "eliminating impediments" to "responsible forest management," or what conservationists like Nash call "immediate exploitation."

"The only natural resources they esteem are the ones they can extract and sell," he said.

Edited by: Jennifer Collins and Tamsin Walker




Stuart Braun Berlin-based journalist with a focus on climate and culture.
Greek ministers resign over EU farming subsidy scandal

DW with AFP, AP, dpa, Reuters
04.04.2026


A scandal over the misuse of EU subsidies has triggered ministerial resignations in Greece. Beneficiaries allegedly made claims for land and livestock they did not own, waved through by lawmakers seeking votes.

Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis replaced several officials on Friday after multiple resignations tied to a widening farm payment scandal.

Investigators allege that lawmakers tried to illegally channel subsidies from the European Union to benefit their voter base.

What is the political significance?

Agriculture Minister Kostas Tsiaras and Civil Protection Minister Yiannis Kefalogiannis both stood down, as well as Deputy Health Minister Dimitris Vartzopoulos. All three denied wrongdoing and said their resignations were intended to smooth the path of the investigation.

Their replacements included the appointment of Margaritis Schinas, a former European Commission vice president, as Greece's new agriculture minister.

Opposition parties have rejected the reshuffle and renewed calls for early elections, warning the crisis could undermine political stability ahead of a scheduled election next year.

Mitsotakis, who was not in power when the fraud began, has vowed to imprison the "thieves" responsible and to reclaim money from those who benefited.

The case has been complicated by Greece's legal framework, under which ministers can only be prosecuted if parliament lifts their immunity — a process often blocked by governing majorities.

It is the second wave of resignations connected with the scandal after five senior officials stepped down last year.

What is the Greek farming subsidy scandal?

Investigators have cited alleged offenses including breach of trust, computer fraud, and false declarations to obtain unlawful benefits.

A probe by the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) has now expanded to at least 20 members of the ruling New Democracy party, including current and former lawmakers.

The EPPO first released details of the scam last May. It accused subsidy beneficiaries of making claims for land that did not belong to them and of exaggerating livestock numbers.

Authorities say the scheme may have involved €23 million (about $26.5 million) in fraudulent payments since about 2018. Among the schemes that have drawn suspicion are banana plantations on Mount Olympus, olive trees in a military airport and pastures on an archeological site.

Most of the fraudulent subsidies were siphoned off to the island of Crete, where the family of Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis has held political sway for more than a century. Official figures show that roughly 80% of subsidies for pastures granted from 2017 to 2020 went to Crete. While the number of livestock farmers in Greece is waning, Crete saw some 13,000 new farmers registered between 2019 and 2025. The tally of declared sheep and goats doubled in the same time frame.

Past investigations and police actions have already led to arrests and fines tied to subsidy mismanagement.

Edited by: Sean Sinico

Richard Connor Reporting on stories from around the world, with a particular focus on Europe — especially Germany.
Cuba: 2,000 prisoners pardoned in Holy Week gesture

DW with dpa, AP, AFP
04.04.2026

The move, which Cuba has described as a "humanitarian" gesture, comes after the United States allowed a Russian oil tanker to deliver crude to the island. But tensions between Havana and Washington persist.

The Cuban government has announced that 2,010 prisoners have been pardoned in a "humanitarian and sovereign gesture" during Holy Week and amid diplomatic tensions with the United States.

The Easter pardons, which applied to some young people, people over 60, women and foreigners, were the second such move this year after Havana unexpectedly announced the release of 51 prisoners in mid-March.

The March pardons were reportedly a result of diplomatic efforts by the Vatican, which has been showing signs of playing a mediating role between Havana and Washington.

The US has been ramping up the pressure on the island to agree to economic and political changes.

Cuba, the communist-ruled Caribbean nation off the south coast of Florida, has been mired in an economic crisis for years, which has been exacerbated over the past three months by a US oil embargo.

US pressure on Cuba

US President Donald Trump has called for changes to Cuba's system of government and even has mused about "taking" the island — but he did allow a Russian tanker to deliver must-needed crude oil to the fuel-starved country this week.

Whether the temporary lifting of the oil embargo and the pardons were linked was not explicitly clear, but Michael Bustamante, chair of Cuban studies at the University of Miami, told the AFP news agency: "It seems not far-fetched to think that this is a sign that some of the conversation between both governments is advancing. Perhaps slowly, but advancing. To where? Unclear."

He added: "I think we will also have to see who is included in these releases to have a sense of their potential political significance."

Cuba: Who has been released?

The Cuban government said that sex offenders and murderers would not be released, but it remained unclear as to whether any political prisoners were among those pardoned.

President Miguel Diaz-Canel said in a statement that the move was based on the nature of the crimes committed, good behavior in prison, health reasons and time served.

It said the decision was "taking place within the context of the religious observances of Holy Week — a customary practice within our criminal justice system and a reflection of the humanitarian legacy of the Revolution."

According to Cuban government figures, more than 11,000 people have now been freed in five prisoner releases since 2011.

The latest comes months after the US deposed ex-Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and pressured Caracas to make radical changes, including releasing prisoners detained for political reasons and passing an amnesty law.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, a Cuban-American and vociferous critic of Havana's government, has applied similar pressure to Cuba, telling Fox News on Tuesday that the country needs economic and political reforms.

"You cannot fix their economy if you don't change their system of government," he said. "But they're in a lot of trouble, there's no doubt about it, and we'll have more news on that fairly soon."