Tuesday, April 07, 2026

FASCISTS OF A FEATHER FLOCK TOGETHER


US Vice President Vance attacks Brussels and vows to help Orbán ahead of Hungarian vote

U.S. Vice President JD Vance holds a joint press conference with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban in Budapest, Hungary Tuesday, April 7, 2026. (Jonathan Ernst/Pool Photo
Copyright AP

By Sandor Zsiros
Published on 

Vance accused the European Union of electoral interference in Hungary’s election campaign during a visit to Budapest. Speaking alongside Orbán, Vance described the Hungarian leader as a “role model” for Europe.

US Vice-President JD Vance accused the European Union of interfering in Hungary’s election campaign and imposing censorship, as he visited Budapest days ahead of a pivotal vote on Sunday which could see a dramatic change in government.

Vance’s trip comes five days before Sunday’s election, in which Prime Minister Viktor Orbán faces his most serious challenge in 16 years in power. The opposition Tisza party, led by Péter Magyar, is currently ahead of Orbán’s Fidesz in opinion polls.

Speaking at a joint press conference, Vance praised Orbán’s leadership, saying it “can provide a model for the continent”, while sharply criticising Brussels.

“The bureaucrats in Brussels have tried to destroy the economy of Hungary, they have tried to make Hungary less energy independent, they have tried to drive up costs for Hungarian consumers,” Vance said, adding that the EU’s actions were politically motivated to hurt Orbán for resisting liberal political conventions.

He also took aim at the bloc’s digital rules, including the Digital Services Act, which requires platforms to tackle disinformation and harmful content. He did not provide any evidence.

“Why are bureaucrats in Brussels telling social media companies what information they’re giving to Hungarian voters?” he said, arguing that Hungarians were capable of making their own decisions.

Vance further alleged that Ukrainian intelligence services were attempting to influence the Hungarian vote.

“We’re certainly aware that there are elements within the Ukrainian intelligence services that try to put their thumb on the scale,” he said. He did not provide any evidence.

The Hungarian government has repeatedly claimed that Kyiv and Brussels are seeking to unseat Orbán and has moved to bolster protections for critical energy infrastructure, citing fears of foreign interference.

Vance, who has in the past expressed admiration for Orbán's ability to root out what he describes as a liberal bias from universities, vowed to assist the Hungarian leader in the final days of the campaign.

"I want to help as much as I possibly can," he told reporters in Budapest.

Former US President Donald Trump has also backed the Hungarian leader, describing him as “a true friend” and praising his stance on migration. Trump has previously supported a number of right-wing candidates abroad.

Hungary’s relations with the EU have grown increasingly strained. In March, Orbán vetoed a €90bn aid package for Ukraine, while Brussels has withheld billions in EU funds over concerns about corruption and the rule of law. The country has also faced criticism within the bloc for maintaining close ties with Russia and its reliance on Russian energy.

Meanwhile, opposition leader Péter Magyar warned against foreign involvement in the vote, urging all countries to respect Hungary’s sovereignty.

“No foreign country may interfere in Hungarian elections,” he said. “This is our country.”

According to an opinion poll published last week by the 21 Research Institute, the opposition Tisza party leads among decided voters with 56% support, compared with 37% for Fidesz — a gap of 19 percentage points.

Despite voicing support for Orbán, Vance said Washington would be prepared to work with whoever wins the election.


Vance hails Orban as a 'model' for Europe during pre-election Hungary visit




 
NOT A WORD ABOUT RUSSIA

JD Vance accuses Brussels of foreign election interference ahead of Hungary’s high-stakes elections


US Vice President JD Vance held a press conference in Budapest on Tuesday to back nationalist Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban ahead of a closely contested parliamentary election. In Vance's speech, he slammed "bureaucrats in Brussels", accusing them of trying to destroy the Hungarian economy, stifle free speech and blocking Trump’s peace efforts in Ukraine.


Issued on: 07/04/2026 
By: FRANCE 24

US Vice-President JD Vance (centre) and his wife, Usha Vance, were welcomed by Hungarian Minister for Foreign Affairs, Peter Szijjarto, on 7 April, 2026 in Budapest, Hungary. © AFP/Pool, Jonathan Ernst



US Vice President JD Vance gave a press briefing in Hungary on Tuesday to deliver Donald Trump's support to his ally, nationalist Prime Minister Viktor Orban, ahead of tightly contested parliamentary elections.

Vance took a swipe at the “bureacrats in Brussels”, accusing them of foreign election interference.

“The bureaucrats in Brussels have tried to destroy the economy of Hungary. They have tried to make Hungary less energy independent. They have tried to drive up costs for Hungarian consumers. And they've done it all because they hate this ⁠guy," Vance said.

He went on to add that the EU had tried to block Trump’s efforts to bring an end to the conflict in Ukraine.


Vance responded to numerous questions about Iran, saying that “there's going to be a lot of negotiation" until 8pm EDT Tuesday, which is the US deadline for Iran to reopen the key shipping channel the Strait of Hormuz.

The vice president touted the US military mission in the Middle East saying the US had largely accomplished its military objectives in Iran.


© France 24
08:21



The 41-year-old conservative is, within the US administration, one of the fiercest critics of centrist and progressive European governments and one of the most fervent supporters of far-right parties in Europe.

His visit is a show of support for Orban in the final stretch before Sunday's elections.

Orban, 62, has been in power for 16 years and is close to Moscow. According to analysts, he has benefited from covert Russian assistance to boost his chances of reelection.

Polls by independent institutes predict a sweeping victory for the Tisza party led by pro-European conservative Peter Magyar.

In two years, Magyar has built an opposition movement capable of challenging the hegemony of the incumbent Hungarian leader, who has transformed his country into a model of illiberal democracy.

Pro-government institutions, for their part, predict victory for Orban's Fidesz-KDNP coalition.

© France 24
08:56



Since returning to power, Trump and his government have broken with the traditional restraint past US administrations have shown regarding foreign elections. Instead, it now strongly and openly shows support for leaders it sees as compatible with its ideology and diplomatic priorities.

Marco Rubio, the US Secretary of State, traveled in mid-February to Budapest, where he wished his Hungarian ally "success".

"I can say to you with confidence that President Trump is deeply committed to your success, because your success is our success," Rubio said during a joint press conference with Orban after their meeting.

Orban is particularly aligned with the Trump administration on anti-migrant policies, which came to the fore in Hungary during the refugee crisis 10 years ago. He has visited Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida several times.

Vance's wife, Usha Vance, is joining him on the trip.

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)
 

Between Budapest and Brussels: Péter Magyar’s political tightrope

Magyar is spending most of his time in Hungary ahead of the 12 April elections
Copyright AP Photo


By Vincenzo Genovese & Maïa de la Baume
Published on 

The leader of Hungary’s opposition Tisza party has prioritised domestic campaigning over his parliamentary duties, at times defying his European Parliament group to appeal to voters while distancing himself from EU figures like Ursula von der Leyen.

Péter Magyar has worked so hard to avoid being labelled a “Brussels puppet” by his rival Viktor Orbán that he’s barely been seen in Brussels at all.

The leader of Tisza, Hungary’s main opposition party, has largely treated his MEP role as a platform to confront the country’s current Prime Minister and boost his campaign in Budapest ahead of the April 12 elections.

Yet, since he was elected an MEP in 2024, Magyar never drafted any parliamentary report; he signed only one resolution in a chamber that produces dozens each month, and, according to many colleagues, rarely attended committee sessions.

Magyar’s last appearance was in Strasbourg in January, when he voted in favour of referring the EU-Mercosur trade deal to the Court of Justice.

“It appears that his participation in plenary votes is indeed rather low, around 21% since the beginning of the term," said Doru Frantescu, an analyst from the EU Matrix, a think tank that provides insights and data on the EU institutions. "This means that he focused on internal politics not only recently, but even before."

The MEP on a Mission

This reflects a clear mission: from the outset, Magyar has prioritised unseating Orbán after 16 years of largely unchallenged rule.

To that end, the European Parliament has functioned as a springboard for his campaign launch, granting him immunity while also enabling him to forge alliances ahead of the crucial vote.

This momentum was already evident in the June 2024 European elections when Magyar captured 30 % of the votes with a party founded a few months before. Soon after, the European People’s Party embraced Tisza’s seven MEPs, bringing them into the continent’s largest political bloc.

With polls suggesting he is on track to win, Magyar’s campaign has intensified in recent months, forcing him to focus on rallies and campaign events in Hungary rather than in Brussels.

In addition, Magyar is far from alone - many MEPs have historically used the European Parliament to advance national campaigns. In his case, however, a vast majority of MEPs support Magyar as the best alternative to Orbán, who has become Brussels’ nemesis, blocking key EU files with his vetoes.

Against this backdrop, the Parliament has helped Magyar raise his political profile both at home and abroad.

The only clash between Orban and him took place in the Strasbourg plenary during Hungary’s EU Council presidency, In October 2024. Following Orban’s customary address to MEPs, Magyar took the floor to accuse him of turning Hungary into the EU's poorest and most corrupt member state.

The exchange did not end there. Magyar later approached Orbán, and the two men shook hands—a photo that quickly went viral, casting Magyar in a favourable light as he appeared energetic next to Orbán.

Yet an MEP’s role is meant to balance European and national responsibilities, a balance that has shifted in recent years as many MEPs spend more time in Brussels and take a more active role in shaping EU policies.

After all, the Treaties clearly define MEP’s duties as playing a “key role in shaping EU rules as they amend and vote on legislative proposals put forward by the European Commission and negotiate the final text with the Council representing EU countries.”

A lawyer by profession, Magyar was appointed member of two influential committees - Constitutional Affairs (AFCO) and Agriculture and Rural Development (AGRI). Yet, he has not been involved in any report drafted by these committees.

He has signed just one resolution—on women’s rights in Iraq—and submitted a single written question to the Commission regarding land confiscation practices tied to the historic Beneš decrees in Slovakia, affecting Hungarian minorities.

“I have not much to say, as I have never seen him,” one MEP who sits in a committee with Magyar told Euronews. Another one confirmed that Magyar’s work at committee level “has been greatly missed,” because of his campaign commitments in Hungary.

Contacted by Euronews, many members of Tisza declined to comment on Magyar's work in the parliament due to the political sensitivity surrounding the Hungarian elections. Others, however, argue that Magyar’s opposition to Orbán places him in an unprecedented position compared with other MEPs.

“This is not a routine campaign, it’s a system-defining election where Hungary’s very EU membership is at stake, and it demands Péter Magyar’s full attention,” a Parliament official close to the Tisza Party told Euronews, claiming that physical absence from Brussels does not mean disengagement.

“He remains fully involved in all key decisions. When high-stakes choices arise, particularly on voting positions, he often joins discussions directly,” the official said.

Another official said that without his parliamentary immunity, “he would have had problems getting to this point.” Hungarian authorities requested Magyar’s immunity to be lifted in three different legal cases, but the Parliament rejected the requests by a large majority.

Within the EPP, Magyar’s absence is noticed but generally accepted.

“He never participates in the group meetings,” an EPP official told Euronews, adding that it was mostly Zoltán Tarr, the head of Tisza’s delegation in the Parliament who represents the party in all the group’s political discussions in Brussels or Strasbourg.

EPP officials acknowledge that the group’s leadership has tolerated Magyar’s limited involvement in group activities, viewing support for an EPP party’s electoral success in Hungary as a higher priority

Walking a tightrope in Brussels

While Tisza is seen as more pro-European than Orbán’s Fidesz, Magyar has been careful to avoid political positioning in Brussels that might be unpopular at home, seeking to counter Orbán’s narrative of him as a “Brussels puppet.”

Orbán has accused Tisza of representing the EU’s and Ukraine’s interests, a claim that Magyar rejects.

For Tisza, Ukraine’s potential accession to the EU is a particularly sensitive issue: although it is supported by most of the European Parliament, including the EPP, many of its voters remain sceptical.

A similar tension exists regarding the EU and the EPP’s commitment to increasing support for Ukraine. In February 2026, Tisza MEPs voted against the EU’s proposed €90 billion loan to Ukraine, aligning with Orbán’s decision to veto it.

“Tisza's margin of maneuver is limited. Having a diametrically opposite position to that of Fidesz would not be popular among a large part of the electorate,” Frantescu said. “They have to carefully balance between the position of the EPP and that of the current public opinion back home.”

On issues like migration and the environment, Tisza acts as a bridge, largely aligning with its European political family while maintaining proximity to Fidesz’s stance.

“EU and Hungary need a strong external border protection and we should fight together against illegal migration. I do not agree with the redistribution of asylum seekers across Europe,” Magyar told Euronews in an interview in October 2024, a few months after his election as MEP.


A campaign poster shows Péter Magyar, the leader of opposition, as a two-faced man, commanded by the EU Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved

At times, efforts to appeal to the Hungarian electorate have created friction between Tisza and other parties within the EPP group.

Tisza has defied the EPP group's stance three times recently, prompting internal sanctions. Its MEPs voted against the EU-Mercosur trade deal, citing the need to defend Hungarian farmers' interests, a move that led Tisza’s lawmakers to be banned from speaking at plenary sessions for six-month.

Another sensitive issue is Tisza’s effort to distance itself from EPP chair Manfred Weber and Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, both depicted negatively by the Hungarian government and frequently shown alongside Magyar in Fidesz’s campaign posters.

This positioning is reflected in its parliamentary behaviour: Tisza MEPs did not support von der Leyen in the last vote of confidence in January, a move widely seen as intentional.

“We are thankful for the confirmation from Brussels that Tisza politicians have no owners," Magyar wrote on Facebook at the time, signalling that his commitment to EPP and EU principles has consistently been secondary to domestic opinion.

Two killed in drone attack in Iraqi Kurdistan

07.04.2026, DPA


Photo: Ismael Adnan/dpa



Two people were killed in a drone attack in Iraq's northern autonomous region of Kurdistan, the region's Prime Minister Masrour Barzani said on Tuesday.

He said that one member of the Iraqi Kurdish Peshmerga security forces and his wife were killed after a drone attack on their home in Erbil city.

"I condemn this heinous crime in the strongest terms and denounce its perpetrators. The targeting of civilians and civilian homes is a war crime," Barzani wrote on X.

Erbil Governor Omed Khoshnaw said that the city has been targeted for more than 10 drone attacks since Monday evening, which caused material damage to people's property due to falling debris across the city.

Erbil is home to a multinational base where soldiers from the United States and Germany are stationed.

Authorities in Kurdistan have previously pledged neutrality in the ongoing US-Israeli war with Iran. Both Iran and pro-Iranian militias in Iraq have claimed responsibility for attacks on the Kurdish region. Iranian forces have also struck Iranian Kurdish groups in neighbouring Iraq.

Earlier on Tuesday, Iraq's Hashd Shaabi, an Iranian-aligned militia, said that one of their fighters was killed in an attack targeting their brigade in the al-Qaem district of the western Anbar province, the official INA news agency reported.

The Hashd Shaabi, also known as the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), described the attack as "a treacherous Zionist-American attack."

The militia played a key role in the fight against Islamic State between 2014 and 2017, and continues to operate alongside Iraqi security forces.

Trump's Iran ultimatum: When does it expire and how serious is his threat to 'blow up everything'?


LEONARD COHEN


By Stefan Grobe
Published on 

US president warns a civilisation could be about to disappear if the regime in Tehran does not respond to his ultimatum after six weeks of war by Tuesday night. What are the possible scenarios? Euronews explains:

US President Donald Trump warned on Tuesday that a “whole civilisation” could die tonight to “never to be brought back again” if Iran fails to respond to his ultimatum. He has threatened to bomb bridges and energy infrastructure, sending the country “back to the Stone Age”, unless Tehran reopens the Strait of Hormuz and agrees to a deal.

Euronews explains what's at stake as the conflict enters a dramatic phase.

Is Trump serious?

Trump has issued ultimatums before, only to back down at the last minute.

On 21 March, he threatened to “obliterate” Iranian oil installations if Tehran did not fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours.

When that deadline expired, however, Trump did not order strikes.

Instead, he announced a five-day pause in air strikes and said he had held “very good and productive conversations” with Iran, revealing for the first time indirect contacts with Tehran.

Trump has a tendency to shift policy positions, but he has now publicly and repeatedly committed to a stance that may be difficult to reverse without losing face.

This leaves him facing what is likely his most consequential decision since the start of the war.

“We have a plan, because of the power of our military, where every bridge in Iran will be decimated … where every power plant in Iran will be out of business, burning, exploding, and never to be used again,” he said.

Critics, however, argue that this is not a credible military option capable of forcing Iran into submission.

“Even significant strikes on Iran’s infrastructure would not produce capitulation,” Danny Citrinowicz, a former Israeli intelligence operative, wrote on X.

“The assumption that pressure alone can break Tehran is not strategy, it is wishful thinking.”

How did Iran react?

Iran flatly rejected Trump’s ultimatum. Tehran’s response was defiant and escalatory rather than conciliatory. Officials said the ultimatum was unacceptable and emphasised Iran’s right to control the waterway.

General Ali Abdollahi Aliabadi of Iran’s central military command described Trump’s threat as a “helpless, nervous, unbalanced and stupid action”. Echoing the US president’s rhetoric, he added: “the gates of hell will open for you”.

A spokesperson for Iran’s military headquarters said: “The illusion of defeating the Islamic Republic of Iran will become a quagmire into which [the US] will sink.”

Before Trump’s ultimatum, Iran had repeatedly demanded broader conditions beyond reopening the Strait of Hormuz, including an end to hostilities, the lifting of sanctions and security guarantees

What has the EU said so far?

European Council President Antonio Costa said Monday that "any targeting of civilian infrastructure, namely energy facilities, is illegal and unacceptable" drawing parallels to the war in Ukraine where Russia has pounded its electricity grid.

Costa said the EU applies the same standards across all conflicts and said the people of Iran are the main victims on an escalation that risks costing the lives of more civilians.

For the rest, most EU leaders have remained on the sidelines and EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has not yet commented, although she is expected to participate at an awards ceremony on Tuesday evening in her native Germany.

Would a massive bombing campaign reopen the Strait of Hormuz?

So far, Trump’s threats appear to have made Iran more uncompromising and, at least rhetorically, prepared to retaliate forcefully.

As Trump himself has noted, Iran could use mines, drones and missiles launched from small boats to keep the Strait unsafe. Even after a large-scale bombing campaign targeting key infrastructure, shipping may not resume quickly.

If Tehran were to reopen the Strait in exchange for an end to US bombing, “it would mean a return to the pre-war status quo, falling far short not just of Trump’s shifting demands but even the prospects under negotiation before Washington started the war,” the Washington-based think tank Defense Priorities said in a research note to Euronews.

However, it would represent the best outcome for US interests, while more ambitious goals such as regime change or ending Iran’s nuclear programme “are only loosely related”, the note added.

Iran is also unlikely to leave the Strait fully open in exchange for a US ceasefire alone. Israel would probably also need to halt its strikes, which could require Trump to pressure Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — something he has previously been reluctant to do.

Is last-minute diplomacy still possible?

The chances appear slim. Iranian officials have so far declined to accept even a temporary ceasefire in exchange for reopening the Strait.

However, mediators from Egypt, Pakistan and Turkey continue to push for at least a short-term ceasefire and reopening deal

Whether these efforts will succeed remains unclear.

At Monday’s press conference, Trump did not sound particularly optimistic, pointing to the frustration of his envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner.

Yet he also spoke of “significant” and imminent prospects for peace, saying negotiations were “going fine” and that there was “an active, willing participant on the other side” negotiating “in good faith”.

Asked whether he was escalating the war or winding it down, Trump replied: “I can’t tell you.”

Some observers question his willingness to pursue diplomacy at all, describing his approach as “the obliteration of diplomacy”.

His “disregard for diplomacy was evident in the weeks preceding the 28 February start of the war,” said David Cortright, a visiting scholar at Cornell University’s Reppy Institute for Peace and Conflict Studies.

“Discussions were underway, with significant Iranian concessions on the table. Mediators and close observers believed progress was being made, but the US and Israel proceeded with military action,” he added.

What would be the domestic fallout in the US?

The domestic fallout could be severe and multi-layered, according to early polling and political signals.

Public opinion, already negative, could turn more sharply against the war. A recent PBS News/NPR/Marist poll found that 56% of Americans oppose US military action in Iran, while 54% disapprove of Trump’s handling of the issue.

A major escalation could also lead to more US casualties and economic strain, creating political risks for Trump and the Republican Party ahead of the midterm elections.

For many Americans, the most immediate impact is rising fuel prices. The average price at the pump has exceeded $4 per gallon for the first time in nearly four years.

Trump, who made lower petrol prices a key campaign pledge in 2024, has described the increase as temporary.

However, analysts warn that sustained high prices could reduce household spending and increase the risk of broader economic damage.

Politically, Republican leaders have largely backed Trump so far, but divisions are beginning to emerge within his MAGA base, which tends to favour a strong stance but is wary of foreign interventions.

Some religious leaders have also criticised the strikes. US-born Pope Leo said God “does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war” and urged Trump to end the conflict.

Meanwhile, Trump ally-turned-critic Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Republican congresswoman, criticised the president’s rhetoric.

“Our president is not a Christian, and his words and actions should not be supported by Christians,” she wrote on X.


Trump threatens to wipe out Iranian civilization in social media post

07.04.2026, DPA


Photo: Kay Nietfeld/dpa


US President Donald Trump has threatened to wipe out Iranian civilization in a post on his Truth Social platform on Tuesday as a deadline he set for Iran to make a deal with him looms.

"A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again," Trump posted. "I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will."

"However, now that we have Complete and Total Regime Change, where different, smarter, and less radicalized minds prevail, maybe something revolutionarily wonderful can happen, WHO KNOWS?

"We will find out tonight, one of the most important moments in the long and complex history of the World."

The United States and Israel launched their latest war on Iran on February 28. Trump's ultimatum for Iran to make a deal or face massive attacks on its energy infrastructure is set to expire on Tuesday evening (0000 GMT).


France opposes US-Israeli attacks on Iranian infrastructure

07.04.2026, DPA


Photo: Michael Kappeler/dpa


The attacks on Iran's civil infrastructure threatened by US President Donald Trump would constitute a violation of international law and lead to escalation and retaliation, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot warned on Tuesday.

Barrot was speaking to broadcaster France Info hours before a deadline set by Trump for Iran to open the Strait of Hormuz or face a massive bombardment expires.

"If we all speak out against attacks on civil and energy infrastructure, then we do so primarily because they are ruled out according to the rules of war and international law, and secondly because in the case of the war in Iran they will undoubtedly lead to a new phase of escalation and retaliatory measures," Barrot said.

This would plunge the region and the global economy into a vicious circle, he predicted.

"We are currently experiencing a rapid rise in fuel prices. If the energy infrastructure in Iran is attacked, retaliatory measures by the Iranian regime can be counted on that would further exacerbate the already worrying situation," Barrot added.

France and other European powers have largely stayed out of the conflict, which was launched by the United States and Israel on February 28.

Trump on Monday threatened the "complete demolition" of Iran's civilian infrastructure, setting a deadline of 8 pm on Tuesday (0000 GMT Wednesday) for the Iranian leadership to make a deal.

Ahead of the deadline, Iranian media reported nationwide attacks on the country's transport network on Tuesday, with railway bridges and motorways hit.

Don't commit war crimes in Iran, EU urges Trump as deadline looms

António Costa, the president of the European Council.
Copyright European Union, 2026.

By Jorge Liboreiro
Published on 

Donald Trump's threat to strike Iran's bridges and power plants has raised the prospect of war crimes. The EU insists all sides should respect international law and exercise "maximum restraint".

The European Union has urged United States President Donald Trump to refrain from bombing civilian infrastructure in Iran — which could be considered war crimes under international law — and exercise "maximum restraint" to achieve a negotiated settlement.

"Diplomacy is the answer," Anitta Hipper, the European Commission's spokesperson for foreign affairs, said on Tuesday in response to an Euronews question.

"From our side, we reject any threats also to attacks regarding critical civilian infrastructure. Such attacks risk impacting millions of people across the Middle East and beyond, and also may lead to further dangerous escalation."

The priority, Hipper said, should be "maximum restraint, the protection of civilians and civilian infrastructure, and full respect for international law and international humanitarian law by all parties".

The Commission's plea comes after Trump drastically ratcheted up his rhetoric over the past few days, threatening to "blow up" bridges and power plants across Iran and send it "back to the Stone Ages" if the country fails to meet his deadline to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a vital passage that used to carry a fifth of the world's oil and gas supplies. Only a handful of ships have crossed it since the start of the US-Israeli strikes on 28 February.

So far, the strongest reaction to Trump's threats has come from António Costa, the president of the European Council, who warned on Monday that striking civilian infrastructure, like energy facilities, would be "illegal and unacceptable".

"This applies to Russia's war in Ukraine and it applies everywhere. The Iranian civilian population is the main victim of the Iranian regime. It would also be the main victim of a widening of the military campaign," Costa said.

"Escalation will not achieve a ceasefire and peace. Only negotiations will, namely the ongoing efforts led by regional partners," he added.

Although the US barely gets any of its energy from the Middle East, the near-total blockage of the waterway has pushed the price of Brent crude past $110 per barrel, roiling financial markets and prompting fears of stagflation.

Trump has imposed a deadline on Tehran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz by Tuesday, 8 pm Eastern Time (ET), which for Brussels will be 2 am on Wednesday.

"The entire country can be taken out in one night – and that night might be tomorrow night," Trump said on Monday. "They're going to have no bridges. They're going to have no power plants. Stone Ages."

Meanwhile, Iran has rejected a proposed 45-day ceasefire and is instead calling for a permanent end to the war, according to the state news agency IRNA.

Trump doubles down

The prohibition on attacking civilian infrastructure is one of the bedrock principles of international law and has been codified in the Hague and Geneva Conventions.

The concept of civilian infrastructure is understood in a broad sense to cover objects not used for military purposes, such as residential buildings, hospitals, schools, churches, power plants, electricity grids, bridges, railways and cell towers.

Asked if he was concerned about the potential commission of war crimes at the hands of American forces, Trump said: "No, not at all. I am not. I hope I don't have to do it.

It is unclear if the US president will stick to his cut-off date of Tuesday, 8 pm ET or change his mind at the last minute, as he has frequently done in the past.

On Tuesday morning, as Americans headed to work, he doubled down on his threat.

"A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again. I don't want that to happen, but it probably will," he wrote on Truth Social. "47 years of extortion, corruption, and death will finally end."

Europeans are watching the escalation with alarm, fearing that any attacks on power plants may further embolden Tehran and deepen the energy crisis.

Since the start of hostilities, European leaders have struggled to make sense of Trump's ever-shifting messaging on the war, which has included broadsides against NATO allies for refusing to send their warships to the Strait of Hormuz.

Last week, French President Emmanuel Macron issued a pointed rebuke, reflecting a growing sense of exasperation among capitals.

"When you want to be serious, you don't say every day the opposite of what you said the day before," Macron said during a visit to South Korea. "And maybe you shouldn't be speaking every day. You should just let things quieten down.