Sunday, October 25, 2026

 

Disaster recovery efforts temporarily boosted health for some men, Northwestern study finds



Sense of purpose gained through recovery work provided short-term physical and mental benefits but left them more vulnerable over time




Northwestern University

Community signage: Stronger than the Carr Fire

image: 

Signage in Northern California's Shasta county after the Carr Fire.  

view more 

Credit: Rebecca Ewert





EVANSTON, Ill., — New Northwestern University research aims to shed light on what drives inequalities among men in the aftermath of mega disasters. In such situations, men are often depicted as heroic leaders, and this study finds that many of them experience improved mental and physical health while assisting with recovery efforts. However, for some men, the boost is short lived once recovery activities are completed, leading to emotional lows and potentially increasing the risk of suicide.

Rebecca Ewert, an assistant professor of instruction in sociology at Northwestern’s Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences and author of the study, grew up in Shasta County, California. After the county was devastated by the Carr wildfire in 2018, she spent six months conducting in-depth interviews with survivors and disaster relief workers about their experiences, hoping to isolate factors contributing to the risk of suicide.

Prior to the fire, risk of suicide among men in the county has been about twice the state average, with men accounting for approximately 80% of suicides. After the fire, Ewert said she found men were doing better than expected. “After a disaster of this magnitude, you’d reasonably expect survivors to feel anger and depression, but my interviews revealed some men experienced a boost in their mental health.”

Ewert found that relief efforts following the Carr fire in Shasta County gave local men an opportunity to show publicly how they care for their families — protecting property, securing housing and clearing debris — which gave some of them a sense of purpose and helped them feel connected to others.

Ewert calls the phenomenon of finding heightened purpose and belonging in an intense and timebound situation “provisional masculine resources.” The intense and temporary characteristics of disasters are key to accessing these opportunities. As recovery activities wrapped up, men said those feelings of wellbeing diminished.

Focusing on inequalities among men, Ewert’s interviews showed survivor responses varied dramatically depending on age. Disaster response activities provided primarily younger and retired men with noticeable improvements in purpose and vitality, while middle-aged men with families and careers did not notice such a boost. And, as recovery activities wrapped up, the boost declined for elderly men (those at highest risk for suicide), leaving them worse off in the long run.

Ewert says these men were worse off in the long term because the stories shared by community members and documented by news outlets around the time of the fire reinforced narrowly defined gender roles that disadvantage both men and women. As the fire recovery period ended, elderly men lost those opportunities to act manly and had many new, memorable stories reminding them of the capacity they have now again lost. Ewert said this temporary character of “provisional masculine resources” is what makes them so influential on men’s health.

“Provisional masculine resources allow some men opportunities to reap gendered rewards while excluding others,” Ewert said. “It also gives legitimacy to survivor and recovery stories containing lessons about gender, which last long after the smoke clears. The overall effect is to justify and retrench an unequal gender regime characterized by inequalities, not only between men and women, but also among men and among women.”

Takeaways for the public

Ewert said although the study looks at a rural county and is focused on disaster, the findings can be applied more broadly.

“We hear discussions about the rise in loneliness, and the young men participating in the manosphere and looksmaxxing, which are ways of performing masculinity for other men,” Ewert said. “There is a need to look at when the rewards of masculinity are powerful but short lived. It’s not accurate to say all men have power and all women don’t.

“The stories we tell about disaster recovery, something seemingly unrelated to gender, in fact play an important role in teaching men and women how they are supposed to behave in relation to one another, stories that reinforce powerful inequalities for people of all genders,” Ewert said.

While many studies have explored social inequalities between men and women, the Northwestern study is unique in its focus on inequalities among men. Ewert says that there is potential in studying bounded periods of heightened purpose and belonging. Ewert suggests future research focus on men as they navigate transitions between these periods (i.e. graduating from college, leaving the military) and on groups of men who get high rewards in a short period, such as school athletes, military personnel, politicians or influencers of culture.

“Provisional masculine resources and disastrous gender inequalities” was published online Oct. 19 in Sage Journal’s Gender & Society.

 

What makes you, you? Massive study maps the genetics of personality



The largest genetic study of personality to date identifies 1,260 associated variants and shows that thousands of tiny genetic effects help shape the Big Five traits alongside environmental influences.




University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine






A massive genetic study offers one of the clearest pictures yet of how DNA contributes to personality, identifying genetic variants associated with five major personality traits. However, rather than uncovering a handful of “personality genes,” the findings show that 1,260 different variants are associated with aspects of personality, which are influenced by thousands of genetic differences, each with a tiny effect.

The study, published recently in Nature, combined data from 46 research groups, with sample sizes ranging from 611,000 to 1.14 million people depending on which of the “Big Five” personality traits was analyzed: extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism or openness to experience. Of the 1,260 genetic variants identified, 824 were in regions not previously linked to the corresponding personality trait.

"There isn’t a single gene for being outgoing or conscientious,” said Henry R. Kranzler, MD, a professor of Psychiatry in the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, director of Penn’s Center for Studies of Addiction, and a co-author of the study. “What we see instead are thousands of genetic differences that individually contribute a small amount, but collectively shape personality, alongside the many influences of a person’s environment.”

Personality is partly genetic, but not predetermined

Common genetic variants explained about 5 to 9 percent of the differences in personality measured in the study’s primary analysis. The researchers estimated that more than 16,000 common genetic variants independently contribute to each of the five personality traits, illustrating just how genetically complex personality is.

The genetic patterns also proved surprisingly consistent. Associations were generally similar across different age groups, Western geographic regions, personality tests, and how people described themselves or were rated by someone close to them. Agreeableness showed less consistency than the other traits.

The researchers went a step further by comparing people within families. Those analyses suggested that most of the genetic associations could not be explained by environmental factors shared among family members, a potential source of bias in studies connecting genetics with behavior.

Links between personality and health

The team also found genetic overlap between personality traits and a broad range of behaviors and health outcomes, including mental health conditions, substance use and physical health. For example, genetic profiles associated with neuroticism were associated with increased risk across the psychiatric conditions studied, while conscientiousness showed genetic associations with less substance use and more frequent exercise.

The associations are at the group level and cannot be used to make predictions about individuals. The researchers found that genetic measures predicted behavior only to a small degree and explicitly cautioned that they cannot predict an individual’s future behavior. Personality, in totality, reflects both genetic and environmental influences.

"These findings give us a new tool for studying why personality is connected to so many aspects of health and behavior,” Kranzler said. “But they also reinforce an important point: our DNA influences, but does not dictate our personality or our future.”

The researchers say larger studies encompassing more ancestral and cultural backgrounds will be important for determining how consistently these genetic patterns apply across populations.

Editor’s Note

The research was supported by multiple funding sources, including grants from the National Institute of Mental Health and National Institute on Aging.

 

Mental health disparities persist for U.S. LGBTQ+ college students nationwide, largest study of its kind finds




One in 10 LGBTQ+ college students reported discrimination in the past year, increasing depression, anxiety, suicidal thoughts, and avoidance of health care





Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health






October 23, 2026-- LGBTQ+ college students who experience discrimination are significantly more likely to experience depression, anxiety, suicidal thoughts, and avoid needed health care, according to a new national study by Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, Boston University School of Public Health and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute. The findings underscore the profound impact of discrimination on student mental health during a critical stage of life. The results are published in the journal Behavior Medicine.

The study, based on nearly 18,000 LGBTQ+ students at 119 colleges and universities across 34 states, is the largest to examine how discrimination affects the mental health and health care experiences of LGBTQ+ college students. It is also the first to assess these associations during and immediately following a national election year, a period marked by heightened political debate over LGBTQ+ rights.

"Addressing discrimination among college students is essential to support student well-being, reduce mental health disparities, and ensure all students have equitable access to care," said Sarah McKetta, MD, PhD, assistant professor of Epidemiology at Columbia Mailman, and co-first author.

Researchers found that one in 10 LGBTQ+ students experienced discrimination on campus during the previous year. Those students were: 84 percent more likely to meet criteria for depression; 87 percent more likely to meet criteria for anxiety; and 78 percent more likely to report suicidal thoughts in the past year.

Students who experienced discrimination in the form of health care or service denial faced even greater risks. Among LGBTQ+ students, denial of health care was associated with a more than 200 percent higher likelihood of suicidal ideation.

"In addition to an increasingly hostile federal climate, many states have enacted legislation aiming to curtail LGBTQ+ rights," said McKetta. "In 2025 alone, more than 1,000 bills were introduced that would limit transgender people's access to health care, education, or legal recognition."

Emerging adulthood is a pivotal period for lifelong health. It is also when many young adults transition from pediatric to adult health care, often losing established providers and facing new barriers to care.

"Behavioral health during emerging adulthood is a strong predictor of health later in life," said McKetta. "Improving access to affirming health care and reducing discrimination during this transition can have lasting benefits."

Overall, mental health needs among LGBTQ+ students were striking. More than half of participants met criteria for depression. Nearly half of LGBQ+ students and more than half of transgender and nonbinary students met criteria for anxiety. Nearly one in five LGBQ+ students and more than one in four transgender and nonbinary students reported suicidal thoughts during the previous year.

Although more than half of participants sought mental health counseling, many continued to avoid health care because of concerns about discrimination. Nearly 5 percent of LGBQ+ students and 13 percent of transgender and nonbinary students reported avoiding needed medical care.

Researchers found that counseling services may represent an important point of intervention. LGBTQ+ students reported utilizing therapy and counseling services from mental health professionals at high rates, suggesting that counseling settings offer an opportunity to identify psychological distress, provide affirming care, and connect students with broader health services.

The researchers analyzed responses from 17,942 LGBTQ+ students ages 18 to 24 who participated in the 2024–2025 Healthy Minds Study, an annual national survey of college student mental health to examine three types of discriminatory experiences: interpersonal discrimination on campus, past denials of healthcare, or past denials of other services on the basis of sexual orientation and/or gender identity. They also assessed how these discriminatory experiences were associated with mental health outcomes: flourishing, depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation; and healthcare utilization.

"Particularly troubling were our findings on suicidal ideation," noted McKetta. "Across every subgroup of students and every type of discrimination we examined, experiencing discrimination increased the likelihood of suicidal thoughts. These findings highlight the urgent need for colleges to address discrimination as part of comprehensive suicide prevention efforts."

The researchers note that transgender and nonbinary students were more than twice as likely as LGBQ+ students to report being denied health care. Because many transgender people rely on medical services for gender-affirming care, such barriers may have especially serious consequences for both physical and mental health.

"Improving training in LGBTQ+ health for clinicians and campus providers can reduce discriminatory experiences, strengthen trust in health care systems, and improve outcomes for students during this pivotal stage of life," said McKetta.

The authors also emphasize the importance of continuing to support large-scale, high-quality research on LGBTQ+ health.

"Understanding how discrimination affects health depends on rigorous data collection and sustained investment in research," said McKetta. "Without these resources, it becomes much more difficult to identify disparities and develop effective solutions."

Co-authors are Sarah K. Lipson (co-first author), Allegra R. Gordon , Sangeeta Subedi, and Alexa L. Bowerfind, Boston University School of Public Health; Erin Voichoski, University of Michigan;  Adison Hicks, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine; Kimberly M. Nelson, Boston University School of Public Health and Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine; and  Brittany M. Charlton, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute.

The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health, R61HD117134 (grant was terminated in March 2025); R00AA031316; K01MH121515; and the William T. Grant Foundation Scholars Program.


Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health

Founded in 1922, the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health pursues an agenda of research, education, and service to address the critical and complex public health issues affecting New Yorkers, the nation and the world. The Columbia Mailman School is the third largest recipient of NIH grants among schools of public health. Its nearly 300 multi-disciplinary faculty members work in more than 100 countries around the world, addressing such issues as preventing infectious and chronic diseases, environmental health, maternal and child health, health policy, climate change and health, and public health preparedness. It is a leader in public health education with more than 1,300 graduate students from 55 nations pursuing a variety of master’s and doctoral degree programs. The Columbia Mailman School is also home to numerous world-renowned research centers, including ICAP and the Center for Infection and Immunity. For more information, please visit www.mailman.columbia.edu.

 

 

 

Suicide attempts, ideation spiked significantly among older U.S. adults after COVID-19 pandemic



Researchers say many affected adults did not have traditional risk factors, highlighting potential gaps in prevention frameworks




University of California - Los Angeles Health Sciences





New research from UCLA Health and UC San Diego Health found a significant spike in suicidal thoughts, planning and attempts among older U.S. adults in the years following the COVID-19 pandemic.

The study, published in the Journal of Affective Disorders, used data from nearly 42,500 adults aged 50 or older surveyed during the National Survey on Drug Use and Health from 2021 to 2024. The analysis found:

  • Suicidal ideation increased 42.6%, suicide planning by 256.2% and suicide attempts by 263.3%
  • Increases in suicidal ideation and planning were concentrated among individuals without traditional risk factors such as major depression or alcohol use, raising questions about whether current screening frameworks are missing a growing at-risk population
  • Suicide planning increased significantly more steeply among those with past-year cannabis use compared to those without (449.9% vs. 188.3% increase)

“These findings suggest that many older adults who are struggling are not the ones our current screening approaches are designed to catch,” said the study’s lead author Dr. Kevin Yang, a psychiatrist and research fellow at the UCLA National Clinician Scholars Program. “If a growing share of suicidal thoughts and plans is showing up in people without a depression diagnosis or recent substance use, we need to rethink how we identify risk and reach older adults before a crisis occurs.”

Suicide prevention for older adults relies heavily on screening for depression and other mental health conditions. The authors state that the findings point to a need for broader risk assessment that could include factors such as social isolation, loneliness, bereavement, financial strain and frailty, in addition to other established risk factors such as depression. Yang said continued monitoring of emerging at-risk groups is needed. Further research is also warranted on what leads older adults from suicidal thoughts to planning and on how cannabis use affects mental health over time.

The authors note that the study was exploratory and its findings should be interpreted cautiously. The survey captures a snapshot in time, so it cannot show why the increases occurred or establish cause and effect. Responses were self-reported; the survey excludes people living in institutions such as hospitals. Additionally, the total number of reported suicide attempts was relatively small (n=113). The authors also note that the results likely underestimate the full burden of suicidal behavior, because the survey cannot capture people who died by suicide.

The study was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the Sam and Rose Stein Institute for Research on Aging at UC San Diego. The study was conducted while Yang was a resident psychiatrist at UC San Diego Health.

 

Operation Soteria driving cultural change in police investigations into rape, but progress stalls as cases reach court





City St George’s, University of London






Operation Soteria has contributed to significant changes in the way rape and serious sexual offence cases are investigated and prosecuted by making them victim-centred, but that progress risks stalling once cases enter the court system, finds a new study.

The report 'End-to-end' Soteria pilot study: Findings and recommendations was led by Professor Katrin Hohl OBE at City St George’s, University of London and is the first study to examine whether and how Operation Soteria's principles are being applied beyond charge and into the later stages of the criminal justice process.

One of the core principles of Operation Soteria was to make investigations victim-centred, by refocusing efforts away from scrutinising victims’ credibility and instead on the actions of the perpetrator.

The report was commissioned by the Ministry of Justice. It examined 25 charged rape and serious sexual offence cases and drew on interviews with police officers, CPS lawyers, barristers and senior criminal justice stakeholders, and tested Soteria training for barristers and barrister-led courtroom training for officers.

Researchers found evidence that Operation Soteria's suspect-focused, context-led approach has become embedded within policing and the Crown Prosecution Service, contributing to changes in the handling of rape cases at a time when the number of rape suspects charged is at its highest level since records began.

However, the study identifies a significant post-charge "cliff edge" in strategic focus, resourcing, training, oversight and accountability. While Operation Soteria has established strong performance management and improvement mechanisms before charge, researchers found comparatively little strategic attention devoted to what happens after cases move towards trial.

The study found differing views among practitioners about whether Soteria has reached the courtroom. Some interviewees felt its impact had yet to be fully realised, while others suggested it is influencing court proceedings "by stealth" through changes in prosecution strategy and decision-making. Researchers also identified considerable variation in attitudes, approaches and practices between individual practitioners, contributing to inconsistency across the criminal justice system.

The report sets out 11 recommendations to strengthen the end-to-end response to rape and serious sexual offences, including the development of a post-charge Soteria strategy, improved trial preparation, stronger learning and feedback mechanisms, and greater engagement with barristers and the judiciary.

Professor Katrin Hohl OBE, Professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice at City St George's, University of London and lead author of the report, said:

"Operation Soteria has contributed to a cultural shift in the police and CPS approach to rape cases, and the number of rape suspects charged is now the highest since records began.

"But not everyone in the justice system thinks that Soteria is a good idea. Some feel that the police and CPS have gone too far in centring victims' rights and needs, but know little about what Soteria actually entails.

"We also find a post-charge 'cliff edge' in strategic focus, resourcing, training and oversight. Policing and the CPS must improve trial preparation and not let efforts drop off once a suspect is charged, but the critical next step is to engage barristers and the judiciary in a whole-system approach."

Claire Waxman OBE, the Victims’ Commissioner for England and Wales, called the report “important” and said:

“Whilst I welcome the progress being driven by Operation Soteria, particularly its shift towards a more suspect-focused approach to the investigation and prosecution of rape, I remain concerned that this progress is not being sustained once cases enter the court system.

“This creates a significant cliff edge in the justice process. While improvements in policing and prosecution are encouraging, victims are still paying the price for outdated myths and stereotypes.

“We need a genuinely whole-system approach to tackling rape and serious violence, ensuring that the victim-centred and suspect-focused principles embedded through Operation Soteria are carried through every stage of the justice process, including the courts.

“The newly announced multi-agency rape and serious sexual offenses (RASSO) Taskforce will be critical in driving this system-wide change. Its success should be measured not simply by activity, but by whether victims experience a justice system that is swifter, fairer and more responsive from report through to resolution.”

Chief Constable Sarah Crew, National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) Lead for Adult Sexual Offences, said:

"The first generation of Operation Soteria cases are now reaching the courts in greater numbers. That presents an important opportunity, but also a challenge. The progress made through investigation and charging must now be matched by a shared understanding of Operation Soteria's principles throughout the wider criminal justice system.”

The Leveson Review, an independent review of the criminal courts in England and Wales commissioned by the Government to tackle the severe Crown Court backlog of nearly 80,000 cases, published its recommendations in October with references to the End-to-end project, and called for the implementation of Operation Soteria best practice principles from report to conviction.