Quebec First Nations want to be full partners in sustainable economic development
Economic strength and wealth comes from the land, said First Nations leaders last week at the Grand Economic Circle of Indigenous Peoples and Quebec.
“I have to reiterate our determination to have our rights and our ancestral territories and our government autonomy respected,” said Assembly of First Nations Quebec and Labrador (AFNQL) Chief Ghislain Picard.
“Economic wealth and prosperity … That is tied to the land,” said Assembly of First Nations National Chief RoseAnne Archibald. “So the land that we stand on today is the basis for all the wealth in this province and all the wealth in this country, and the people who are the rightful caretakers of that land are First Nations. So unceded land means that it’s important that First Nations have access to the wealth of their land.”
On Nov. 25 and 26, chiefs, Indigenous entrepreneurs, business leaders and Quebec elected officials gathered in Montreal, the unceded territory of the Kanien’kehá:ka Nation. The Grand Economic Circle was a joint venture between the AFNQL and the provincial government to discuss economics and better inclusion of Indigenous peoples.
“Economics is a subject which is very important to us. The premier, in his opening speech, mentioned that First Nations should be part of this economic comeback,” said Indigenous Affairs Minister Ian Lafrenière. He urged participants to work together and network to find economic solutions.
Premier Francois Legault, who delivered his speech at the start of the new parliamentary session of the Quebec National Assembly on Oct. 19, addressed First Nations, saying they work as partners in a nation-to-nation dialogue.
Panels lead by chiefs at the economic circle made clear that reconciliation was only possible when economic development in the province of Quebec moved forward in full and equal partnership with Indigenous communities.
Full partnership includes Indigenous communities being consulted prior to any development being undertaken; development contracts with Indigenous communities being normal and not the exception; Indigenous representation on corporate boards and within governments; and training adapted to meet Indigenous needs, said Chief Monik Kistabish of the Abitibiwinni First Nation.
“(The government must) have the true desire to reduce the socio-economic gap,” said Kistabish.
That will only come, he said, when the Quebec government stops exploiting the land, and development industries, such as mining, sign impact benefit agreements with First Nations before new projects received permission or extensions were granted.
Chiefs also said that economic development had to be informed by First Nations values.
“Too often when looking at economic development (it’s) as an issue of amassing wealth, amassing gain, and I think that perspective has to be readjusted to more of a First Nations’ approach where it’s more wholistic. You do have to take into consideration the impacts we have on the environment and how resources are exploited,” said Chief John Martin of the Micmacs of Gesgapegiag.
“In 2021 with an approach whereby First Nations represent … an added value to the economic development of our regions across Quebec, I believe that government must add their capacity and their level of cooperation to working with First Nations,” said Chief Gilbert Dominique of Pekuakamiulnuasht Takuhikan.
“We are not against economic development. We want to be a part, a stakeholder in economic development, taking into account our aspirations, our values, our challenges,” said Dominique.
He stressed that First Nations were not lobbying groups but decision-makers, and only when the Quebec government realized that would there be a “win-win situation for the future of our First Nations.”
Martin also pointed out that when First Nations benefitted so did the communities surrounding them.
Archibald, who participated in a panel of women leaders, said it was important that development agreements were sustainable and that seven generations forward was the benchmark for sustainability.
“These agreements that we’re reaching between First Nations and business partners have to balance the ideas of developing a resource and developing an economy with also protecting the land. So we have to do two things at once. I know sometimes people feel that these two things are at odds but they're not. We can hold two contradictory ideas in one space,” said Archibald.
She criticized the way planning is being done now. She said with Indian Act band elections happening every two years, custom band elections every three to four years, and provincial and federal government elections every four years, thinking and planning has been limited to those time-frames.
Building something substantial means planning for seven generations ahead–175 years–which ensures that development does not involve eliminating resources, but involves developing a future for youth, stressed Archibald.
“I think that's part of the way forward. If people were to look at us, whether it's business partners or potential government partners in development in the future, that's the vision that we bring in having environmental stewardship and environmental responsibility in projects,” said Grand Chief Kahsennehawe Sky-Deer of the Mohawk Council of Kahnawa:ke.
Capacity building of youth, environmental health and preservation of culture vitality are all important, said Grand Chief Mandy Gull-Masty of the Grand Council of the Crees.
Industries have an advantage, she said, when they can ensure “social acceptability.”
It’s a balancing act, she said, to deliver jobs for youth and to ensure members can still hunt, trap and fish in their traditional territory. When industry can deliver on this it provides an opportunity for industry to steer government in creating new policy, new mechanisms, and new procedures, said Gull-Masty.
On the final day of the conference, Lafrenière announced a $3.3 million investment by his government for a hotel project in Kahnawa:ke.
The federal government also coincided its announcement of the renewal of two key strategic partnership initiatives with the conference. True North Treasure Initiative and the Forest Full Value Initiatives will each receive $4.5 million. Both contribute to the economic self-sufficiency of Indigenous communities in Quebec, said Indigenous Services Minister Patty Hajdu.
Windspeaker.com
By Shari Narine, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, Windspeaker.com, Windspeaker.com
Tuesday, November 30, 2021
Saskatchewan moves to amend Constitution amid civil trial with Canadian Pacific
REGINA — The basis of a lawsuit between Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd. and the Saskatchewan government is moving to the floor of Parliament after provincial legislature members passed a motion to amend the Constitution. 
© Provided by The Canadian Press
Canadian Pacific is suing the province for $341 million over a clause that was written in a contract so old John A. Macdonald was prime minister and Saskatchewan wasn’t yet a province.
The court battle, which has been going on for 13 years, is currently being argued at trial in Regina’s Court of Queen’s Bench.
In its statement of claim, CP says it wants a return of taxes paid to Saskatchewan since 2002 and a declaration that future taxes are not payable.
The corporation argues it's exempt from paying certain taxes based primarily on a 1880 contract between Canada and CP’s predecessor. In exchange for tax exemptions, CP agreed to build the transcontinental railway.
“In exchange for CP’s investments and commitment to build and to operate this railway forever, the prairie provinces and federal government agreed to certain tax exemptions for business conducted on this main line,” CP spokesman Patrick Waldron said in an email.
The exemption became part of the Saskatchewan Act in the Constitution, when the province was created 116 years ago.
However, Saskatchewan argues the tax exemption was rescinded on Aug. 29, 1966, in a letter from then-CP president Ian D. Sinclair to the federal transport minister, John Pickersgill, in exchange for modernized transportation legislation.
The trial, which began four weeks ago, is scheduled wrap up in mid-December.
On Monday, the Saskatchewan government unanimously made a resolution to amend the Constitution as it relates to the Saskatchewan Act.
"It would be unfair to the residents of Saskatchewan if a major corporation were exempt from certain provincial taxes, casting that tax burden onto the residents of Saskatchewan,” the motion reads.
REGINA — The basis of a lawsuit between Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd. and the Saskatchewan government is moving to the floor of Parliament after provincial legislature members passed a motion to amend the Constitution.
© Provided by The Canadian PressCanadian Pacific is suing the province for $341 million over a clause that was written in a contract so old John A. Macdonald was prime minister and Saskatchewan wasn’t yet a province.
The court battle, which has been going on for 13 years, is currently being argued at trial in Regina’s Court of Queen’s Bench.
In its statement of claim, CP says it wants a return of taxes paid to Saskatchewan since 2002 and a declaration that future taxes are not payable.
The corporation argues it's exempt from paying certain taxes based primarily on a 1880 contract between Canada and CP’s predecessor. In exchange for tax exemptions, CP agreed to build the transcontinental railway.
“In exchange for CP’s investments and commitment to build and to operate this railway forever, the prairie provinces and federal government agreed to certain tax exemptions for business conducted on this main line,” CP spokesman Patrick Waldron said in an email.
The exemption became part of the Saskatchewan Act in the Constitution, when the province was created 116 years ago.
However, Saskatchewan argues the tax exemption was rescinded on Aug. 29, 1966, in a letter from then-CP president Ian D. Sinclair to the federal transport minister, John Pickersgill, in exchange for modernized transportation legislation.
The trial, which began four weeks ago, is scheduled wrap up in mid-December.
On Monday, the Saskatchewan government unanimously made a resolution to amend the Constitution as it relates to the Saskatchewan Act.
"It would be unfair to the residents of Saskatchewan if a major corporation were exempt from certain provincial taxes, casting that tax burden onto the residents of Saskatchewan,” the motion reads.
CANADA
Critics want plug pulled on federal oil and gas fund
Green Party MPs and environmental groups say a financial relief program for onshore oil and gas companies should be scrapped after a scathing report by Canada’s climate watchdog was released Thursday.
“This is an egregious example of a fossil fuel subsidy,” said Julia Levin, senior program manager for climate and energy at advocacy group Environmental Defence. “This needs to be a no-brainer for the government to get rid of this program.”
The Emissions Reduction Fund provides up to $675 million in the form of interest-free loans and non-repayable grants to help land-based oil and gas companies attract investment, retain jobs, and reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that cause climate change. But a report by Environment and Sustainable Development Commissioner Jerry DeMarco found the program was not designed to retain jobs or reduce emissions, and that Natural Resources Canada vastly overestimated the emissions reductions the program would achieve.
In the first round of funding, nearly a third of the program’s approved projects indicated the money would lead to an increase in future oil or gas production, but those increases were not factored into its assessments, according to the report.
The 48-page report presents ample evidence the onshore emissions reduction fund was not actually effective at cutting emissions, despite its name. In fact, it could actually be increasing them, said DeMarco.
The federal government is “committed to eliminating fossil fuel subsidies that are incenting the production and exploration of oil and gas” by 2023, Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson told Canada’s National Observer, but that excludes programs that “are good for the environment, like remediating orphan wells or programs focused on cutting emissions.”
Green MPs Elizabeth May and Mike Morrice want to see the program discontinued, with May calling it “part of a climate emergency acceleration plan” because it has locked Canada into increased oil and gas production at a time when phasing out fossil fuels has never been more important.
In question period Thursday, May asked Wilkinson how the program could be fixed.
Wilkinson said the fund, created in response to the COVID-19 crisis, aimed to do two things: sustain jobs and “ensure continued action on methane pollution at a time of economic crisis.” On both counts, he argued, the program succeeded.
However, the commissioner’s report found Natural Resources Canada did not list retaining jobs as an eligibility condition or an assessment criterion for funding decisions. DeMarco could not even say definitively whether any reductions came about as a result of the program because at least some of the program’s emissions reduction target was already accounted for under other federal policies.
Wilkinson went on to say the oil and gas sector has “certainly improved in terms of economic prospects” and the department has “commenced a review of the future of this program and the remaining funding.”
Moving forward, the most important thing is to ensure no more funds are sent out under the current framework, said Morrice.
To date, only $134 million of the $675-million fund has been disbursed, and he wants to see the remainder reallocated to projects that will actually achieve emissions reductions, like building retrofits, climate adaptation and initiatives geared toward a just transition away from fossil fuels.
As things stand, though, the recently audited emissions reductions fund is “another gift to the oil and gas industry at the expense of taxpayers,” says Levin.
“We shouldn't need the commissioner to audit every single spending program for government to make the right decisions when it comes to using public dollars,” she said.
“The commissioner is not going to do an audit of every single subsidy program, so how are we going to get the government to actually design programs that don't continue to fuel the climate crisis?”
In a statement to Canada’s National Observer, NDP environment critic Laurel Collins said “using faulty greenhouse gas emission estimates to fund the oil and gas sector” puts both Canada’s emission reduction targets and the health of Canadians at risk, and “the Liberals are not showing the climate leadership that they’ve repeatedly told Canadians they can expect.”
Both the NDP and Green Party remain adamant that Canada’s current greenhouse gas emissions reduction target of 40 to 45 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030 is not enough. May hopes the target can be changed to 60 per cent to reflect Canada’s fair share of global emissions before the UN climate conference next year.
Vanessa Corkal, a policy adviser with the International Institute for Sustainable Development, says there’s a “really large risk” of undermining our climate targets if proper assessments aren’t done to catch things like the overestimations revealed by the commissioner’s report.
No matter the sector, she says any government program involving emissions reduction must be designed with robust accounting principles, strict funding conditions and criteria to ensure job retention and emissions reduction outcomes are included in the design and properly measured.
DeMarco said repeatedly that the program’s non-repayable loans are “fossil fuel subsidies, no doubt about it,” and Corkal says the report illustrates the risks of subsidies that claim to have environmental goals but are actually highly inefficient.
She says the emissions reduction fund and other programs need to be included in Canada and Argentina’s ongoing peer review of inefficient fossil fuel subsidies, which has yet to be made public.
Launched in June 2019, the peer review is part of a G20 commitment to eliminate all inefficient fossil fuel subsidies. Similar peer reviews between other countries took between 12 and 24 months; Canada and Argentina’s review has been going on for nearly 30.
On Nov. 26, Wilkinson was asked about when findings of the peer review would be published. He said “that process is ongoing” and he couldn’t provide a deadline but recognized it is something the government needs to give an update on.
For Morrice, now is “not a time for review and study. It’s a time for decisive action.”
“How much longer do we need to study and review continued investment of public funds into the very sector that is the leading contributor to the climate crisis?”
The emissions reduction fund highlights how poorly Natural Resources Canada is designing federal programs, says Levin.
“There's a disconnect between what ministers tell the public these programs are set out to achieve, and then what the actual parameters of the program are,” she said.
An example of this is the $1.72 billion given to B.C., Alberta, and Saskatchewan for cleaning up orphan or inactive wells. The federal government framed it as an opportunity to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, create jobs, further Indigenous reconciliation and contribute to an inclusive economic recovery, but a report found the Alberta program “amounts to little more than a bailout to the oil and gas industry.”
Most of the jobs the program boasted about creating were likely only temporary or would have existed with or without the funding, and there was widespread work stoppage in well cleanup activities as companies awaited grants, according to the report.
Alberta’s failure mirrors the commissioner's conclusions about the emissions reduction fund; both programs lack transparency and did not achieve what they said they would.
“[The emissions reduction fund] was designed to pay oil and gas companies to comply with existing regulations,” said Levin, adding the money should be reinvested into independent monitoring of methane emissions and paired with stronger federal regulations to force oil and gas companies to get with the program.
“These are companies that have profited, they've made billions of dollars, this is the richest industry in the world,” said Levin. “Why are we not putting it on them to take care of the mess that they're leaving behind?”
Natasha Bulowski, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, Canada's National Observer
Critics want plug pulled on federal oil and gas fund
Green Party MPs and environmental groups say a financial relief program for onshore oil and gas companies should be scrapped after a scathing report by Canada’s climate watchdog was released Thursday.
“This is an egregious example of a fossil fuel subsidy,” said Julia Levin, senior program manager for climate and energy at advocacy group Environmental Defence. “This needs to be a no-brainer for the government to get rid of this program.”
The Emissions Reduction Fund provides up to $675 million in the form of interest-free loans and non-repayable grants to help land-based oil and gas companies attract investment, retain jobs, and reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that cause climate change. But a report by Environment and Sustainable Development Commissioner Jerry DeMarco found the program was not designed to retain jobs or reduce emissions, and that Natural Resources Canada vastly overestimated the emissions reductions the program would achieve.
In the first round of funding, nearly a third of the program’s approved projects indicated the money would lead to an increase in future oil or gas production, but those increases were not factored into its assessments, according to the report.
The 48-page report presents ample evidence the onshore emissions reduction fund was not actually effective at cutting emissions, despite its name. In fact, it could actually be increasing them, said DeMarco.
The federal government is “committed to eliminating fossil fuel subsidies that are incenting the production and exploration of oil and gas” by 2023, Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson told Canada’s National Observer, but that excludes programs that “are good for the environment, like remediating orphan wells or programs focused on cutting emissions.”
Green MPs Elizabeth May and Mike Morrice want to see the program discontinued, with May calling it “part of a climate emergency acceleration plan” because it has locked Canada into increased oil and gas production at a time when phasing out fossil fuels has never been more important.
In question period Thursday, May asked Wilkinson how the program could be fixed.
Wilkinson said the fund, created in response to the COVID-19 crisis, aimed to do two things: sustain jobs and “ensure continued action on methane pollution at a time of economic crisis.” On both counts, he argued, the program succeeded.
However, the commissioner’s report found Natural Resources Canada did not list retaining jobs as an eligibility condition or an assessment criterion for funding decisions. DeMarco could not even say definitively whether any reductions came about as a result of the program because at least some of the program’s emissions reduction target was already accounted for under other federal policies.
Wilkinson went on to say the oil and gas sector has “certainly improved in terms of economic prospects” and the department has “commenced a review of the future of this program and the remaining funding.”
Moving forward, the most important thing is to ensure no more funds are sent out under the current framework, said Morrice.
To date, only $134 million of the $675-million fund has been disbursed, and he wants to see the remainder reallocated to projects that will actually achieve emissions reductions, like building retrofits, climate adaptation and initiatives geared toward a just transition away from fossil fuels.
As things stand, though, the recently audited emissions reductions fund is “another gift to the oil and gas industry at the expense of taxpayers,” says Levin.
“We shouldn't need the commissioner to audit every single spending program for government to make the right decisions when it comes to using public dollars,” she said.
“The commissioner is not going to do an audit of every single subsidy program, so how are we going to get the government to actually design programs that don't continue to fuel the climate crisis?”
In a statement to Canada’s National Observer, NDP environment critic Laurel Collins said “using faulty greenhouse gas emission estimates to fund the oil and gas sector” puts both Canada’s emission reduction targets and the health of Canadians at risk, and “the Liberals are not showing the climate leadership that they’ve repeatedly told Canadians they can expect.”
Both the NDP and Green Party remain adamant that Canada’s current greenhouse gas emissions reduction target of 40 to 45 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030 is not enough. May hopes the target can be changed to 60 per cent to reflect Canada’s fair share of global emissions before the UN climate conference next year.
Vanessa Corkal, a policy adviser with the International Institute for Sustainable Development, says there’s a “really large risk” of undermining our climate targets if proper assessments aren’t done to catch things like the overestimations revealed by the commissioner’s report.
No matter the sector, she says any government program involving emissions reduction must be designed with robust accounting principles, strict funding conditions and criteria to ensure job retention and emissions reduction outcomes are included in the design and properly measured.
DeMarco said repeatedly that the program’s non-repayable loans are “fossil fuel subsidies, no doubt about it,” and Corkal says the report illustrates the risks of subsidies that claim to have environmental goals but are actually highly inefficient.
She says the emissions reduction fund and other programs need to be included in Canada and Argentina’s ongoing peer review of inefficient fossil fuel subsidies, which has yet to be made public.
Launched in June 2019, the peer review is part of a G20 commitment to eliminate all inefficient fossil fuel subsidies. Similar peer reviews between other countries took between 12 and 24 months; Canada and Argentina’s review has been going on for nearly 30.
On Nov. 26, Wilkinson was asked about when findings of the peer review would be published. He said “that process is ongoing” and he couldn’t provide a deadline but recognized it is something the government needs to give an update on.
For Morrice, now is “not a time for review and study. It’s a time for decisive action.”
“How much longer do we need to study and review continued investment of public funds into the very sector that is the leading contributor to the climate crisis?”
The emissions reduction fund highlights how poorly Natural Resources Canada is designing federal programs, says Levin.
“There's a disconnect between what ministers tell the public these programs are set out to achieve, and then what the actual parameters of the program are,” she said.
An example of this is the $1.72 billion given to B.C., Alberta, and Saskatchewan for cleaning up orphan or inactive wells. The federal government framed it as an opportunity to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, create jobs, further Indigenous reconciliation and contribute to an inclusive economic recovery, but a report found the Alberta program “amounts to little more than a bailout to the oil and gas industry.”
Most of the jobs the program boasted about creating were likely only temporary or would have existed with or without the funding, and there was widespread work stoppage in well cleanup activities as companies awaited grants, according to the report.
Alberta’s failure mirrors the commissioner's conclusions about the emissions reduction fund; both programs lack transparency and did not achieve what they said they would.
“[The emissions reduction fund] was designed to pay oil and gas companies to comply with existing regulations,” said Levin, adding the money should be reinvested into independent monitoring of methane emissions and paired with stronger federal regulations to force oil and gas companies to get with the program.
“These are companies that have profited, they've made billions of dollars, this is the richest industry in the world,” said Levin. “Why are we not putting it on them to take care of the mess that they're leaving behind?”
Natasha Bulowski, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, Canada's National Observer
World’s vast networks of underground fungi to be mapped for first time
Vast networks of underground fungi – the “circulatory system of the planet” – are to be mapped for the first time, in an attempt to protect them from damage and improve their ability to absorb and store carbon dioxide.
Vast networks of underground fungi – the “circulatory system of the planet” – are to be mapped for the first time, in an attempt to protect them from damage and improve their ability to absorb and store carbon dioxide.
\
© Provided by The Guardian Photograph: Biosphoto/Alamy
Hotspots of mycorrhizal fungi are thought to be under threat, from agriculture, urbanisation, pollution, water scarcity and changes to the climate.
Fiona Harvey BBC Environment correspondent
Fungi use carbon to build networks in the soil, which connect to plant roots and act as nutrient “highways”, exchanging carbon from plant roots for nutrients. For instance, some fungi are known to supply 80% of phosphorus to their host plants.
Underground fungal networks can extend for many miles but are rarely noticed, though trillions of miles of them are thought to exist around the world. These fungi are vital to the biodiversity of soils and soil fertility, but little is known about them.
Many hotspots of mycorrhizal fungi are thought to be under threat, from the expansion of agriculture, urbanisation, pollution, water scarcity and changes to the climate.
The new project, from the Society for the Protection of Underground Networks (SPUN), will involve the collection of 10,000 samples around the world, from hotspots that are being identified through artificial intelligence technology.
Jane Goodall, the conservationist, who is advising the project, said: “An understanding of underground fungal networks is essential to our efforts to protect the soil, on which life depends, before it is too late.”
The Society for the Protection of Underground Networks comprises scientists from the Netherlands, Canada, the US, France, Germany and the University of Manchester in the UK.
The first collections will take place next year in Patagonia, and continue for about 18 months, to create maps of potential underground mycorrhizal fungi that can be used for further research. Using the maps, the scientists hope to pinpoint the ecosystems facing the most urgent threats, and partner with local conservation organisations to try to create “conservation corridors” for the underground ecosystems.
This is believed to be the first major effort to map an underground ecosystem in this way. Climate science has focused on above-ground ecosystems, and although we know that fungi are essential for soil structure and fertility, and the global carbon cycle – as ecosystems with thriving mycorrhizal fungi networks have been shown to store eight times as much carbon as ecosystems without such networks – much of the role of fungi in the soil nutrient cycle remains mysterious.
Mark Tercek, former CEO of the Nature Conservancy, and a member of the governing body for SPUN, said: “Fungal networks underpin life on Earth. If trees are the ‘lungs’ of the planet, fungal networks are the ‘circulatory systems’. These networks are largely unexplored.”
Mycorrhizal fungi create tough organic compounds that provide structure to the soil, and store carbon in their necromass, the networks that are no longer active, but remain woven into the soil.
Modern industrial agriculture adds vast quantities of chemical fertiliser which interrupts the dynamics of exchange between plants and fungi, scientists warn. Without thriving fungal networks, crops require more chemical inputs and are more vulnerable to drought, soil erosion, pests and pathogens. Mechanical ploughing in modern agriculture also damages the physical integrity of fungal networks.
There is also increasing evidence that some combinations of fungi can enhance productivity more than others, so guarding these is critical, according to soil scientists.
Ten hotspots have been identified by the scientists involved, including: Canadian tundra; the Mexican plateau; high altitudes in South America; Morocco; the western Sahara; Israel’s Negev desert; the steppes of Kazakhstan; the grasslands and high plains of Tibet; and the Russian taiga.
Jeremy Grantham, a billionaire financier and funder of climate research who is funding the project with $3.5m (£2.6m), said: “Just below our feet lies an invaluable ally in mitigating climate change: vast hidden fungal networks. Billions of tonnes of carbon dioxide flow annually from plants to fungal networks. Yet these carbon sinks are poorly understood. In working to map and harness this threatened but vital resource for life on earth, SPUN is pioneering a new chapter in global conservation.”
Hotspots of mycorrhizal fungi are thought to be under threat, from agriculture, urbanisation, pollution, water scarcity and changes to the climate.
Fiona Harvey BBC Environment correspondent
Fungi use carbon to build networks in the soil, which connect to plant roots and act as nutrient “highways”, exchanging carbon from plant roots for nutrients. For instance, some fungi are known to supply 80% of phosphorus to their host plants.
Underground fungal networks can extend for many miles but are rarely noticed, though trillions of miles of them are thought to exist around the world. These fungi are vital to the biodiversity of soils and soil fertility, but little is known about them.
Many hotspots of mycorrhizal fungi are thought to be under threat, from the expansion of agriculture, urbanisation, pollution, water scarcity and changes to the climate.
The new project, from the Society for the Protection of Underground Networks (SPUN), will involve the collection of 10,000 samples around the world, from hotspots that are being identified through artificial intelligence technology.
Jane Goodall, the conservationist, who is advising the project, said: “An understanding of underground fungal networks is essential to our efforts to protect the soil, on which life depends, before it is too late.”
The Society for the Protection of Underground Networks comprises scientists from the Netherlands, Canada, the US, France, Germany and the University of Manchester in the UK.
The first collections will take place next year in Patagonia, and continue for about 18 months, to create maps of potential underground mycorrhizal fungi that can be used for further research. Using the maps, the scientists hope to pinpoint the ecosystems facing the most urgent threats, and partner with local conservation organisations to try to create “conservation corridors” for the underground ecosystems.
This is believed to be the first major effort to map an underground ecosystem in this way. Climate science has focused on above-ground ecosystems, and although we know that fungi are essential for soil structure and fertility, and the global carbon cycle – as ecosystems with thriving mycorrhizal fungi networks have been shown to store eight times as much carbon as ecosystems without such networks – much of the role of fungi in the soil nutrient cycle remains mysterious.
Mark Tercek, former CEO of the Nature Conservancy, and a member of the governing body for SPUN, said: “Fungal networks underpin life on Earth. If trees are the ‘lungs’ of the planet, fungal networks are the ‘circulatory systems’. These networks are largely unexplored.”
Mycorrhizal fungi create tough organic compounds that provide structure to the soil, and store carbon in their necromass, the networks that are no longer active, but remain woven into the soil.
Modern industrial agriculture adds vast quantities of chemical fertiliser which interrupts the dynamics of exchange between plants and fungi, scientists warn. Without thriving fungal networks, crops require more chemical inputs and are more vulnerable to drought, soil erosion, pests and pathogens. Mechanical ploughing in modern agriculture also damages the physical integrity of fungal networks.
There is also increasing evidence that some combinations of fungi can enhance productivity more than others, so guarding these is critical, according to soil scientists.
Ten hotspots have been identified by the scientists involved, including: Canadian tundra; the Mexican plateau; high altitudes in South America; Morocco; the western Sahara; Israel’s Negev desert; the steppes of Kazakhstan; the grasslands and high plains of Tibet; and the Russian taiga.
Jeremy Grantham, a billionaire financier and funder of climate research who is funding the project with $3.5m (£2.6m), said: “Just below our feet lies an invaluable ally in mitigating climate change: vast hidden fungal networks. Billions of tonnes of carbon dioxide flow annually from plants to fungal networks. Yet these carbon sinks are poorly understood. In working to map and harness this threatened but vital resource for life on earth, SPUN is pioneering a new chapter in global conservation.”
CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M
Australia bank pays out over charging dead people
Australian banking giant Westpac has admitted to breaking the law after it was hit with six lawsuits by regulators over its poor treatment of customers, including charging fees to dead people.
Australian banking giant Westpac has admitted to breaking the law after it was hit with six lawsuits by regulators over its poor treatment of customers, including charging fees to dead people.
© Getty Images
It will pay $81m (A$113m; £61m) in penalties, subject to court approval.
The bank will also hand $57m of compensation to its customers.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) said Westpac needs to urgently improve its "poor compliance culture".
"The conduct and breaches alleged in these proceedings caused widespread consumer harm and ranged across Westpac's everyday banking, financial advice, superannuation and insurance businesses," ASIC Deputy Chair Sarah Court said.
ASIC, Australia's corporate watchdog, said one of the six investigations found the bank had charged more than $7m in fees over a 10-year period to more than 11,000 "deceased customers for financial advice services that were not provided due to their death."
The regulator also said Westpac distributed duplicate insurance policies to more than 7,000 customers, causing customers to unnecessarily pay for two, or more, policies.
It also estimated that at least 25,000 customers were charged more than $5m in fees that had not been disclosed adequately.
ASIC said Westpac had admitted the allegations filed in the federal court.
"In each of these matters, Westpac has fallen short of our standards and the standards our customers expect of us.
"The issues raised in these matters should not have occurred, and our processes, systems and monitoring should have been better. We are putting things right and unreservedly apologise to our customers," Westpac chief executive Peter King said in a statement.
It is the latest major regulatory blow for Westpac. In September last year, it agreed to pay a record $930m fine for the country's biggest ever breach of money laundering laws.
The previous year, Westpac's then-chief executive Brian Hartzer stepped down after the bank became embroiled in the money-laundering scandal.
Also in 2019, a national inquiry into Australia's scandal-plagued financial sector proposed sweeping changes to the industry in an attempt to end rampant misconduct.
The Royal Commission - Australia's highest form of public inquiry - spent 12 months investigating wrongdoing by some of the country's biggest institutions.
It came after a decade of scandals that shook confidence in Australia's largest industry.
You may also be interested in:
It will pay $81m (A$113m; £61m) in penalties, subject to court approval.
The bank will also hand $57m of compensation to its customers.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) said Westpac needs to urgently improve its "poor compliance culture".
"The conduct and breaches alleged in these proceedings caused widespread consumer harm and ranged across Westpac's everyday banking, financial advice, superannuation and insurance businesses," ASIC Deputy Chair Sarah Court said.
ASIC, Australia's corporate watchdog, said one of the six investigations found the bank had charged more than $7m in fees over a 10-year period to more than 11,000 "deceased customers for financial advice services that were not provided due to their death."
The regulator also said Westpac distributed duplicate insurance policies to more than 7,000 customers, causing customers to unnecessarily pay for two, or more, policies.
It also estimated that at least 25,000 customers were charged more than $5m in fees that had not been disclosed adequately.
ASIC said Westpac had admitted the allegations filed in the federal court.
"In each of these matters, Westpac has fallen short of our standards and the standards our customers expect of us.
"The issues raised in these matters should not have occurred, and our processes, systems and monitoring should have been better. We are putting things right and unreservedly apologise to our customers," Westpac chief executive Peter King said in a statement.
It is the latest major regulatory blow for Westpac. In September last year, it agreed to pay a record $930m fine for the country's biggest ever breach of money laundering laws.
The previous year, Westpac's then-chief executive Brian Hartzer stepped down after the bank became embroiled in the money-laundering scandal.
Also in 2019, a national inquiry into Australia's scandal-plagued financial sector proposed sweeping changes to the industry in an attempt to end rampant misconduct.
The Royal Commission - Australia's highest form of public inquiry - spent 12 months investigating wrongdoing by some of the country's biggest institutions.
It came after a decade of scandals that shook confidence in Australia's largest industry.
You may also be interested in:
Stolen gods: Nepal seeks to bring home lost treasures
AFP
When Virginia Tech professor Sweta Gyanu Baniya saw an ornate 17th-century Nepali necklace in the Art Institute of Chicago, she burst into tears, bowed down and began to pray.
Now a video she posted on social media has made the artefact one of the latest targets for heritage activists sleuthing online to try to bring home some of the thousands of items whisked out over decades from the Himalayan country.
AFP
When Virginia Tech professor Sweta Gyanu Baniya saw an ornate 17th-century Nepali necklace in the Art Institute of Chicago, she burst into tears, bowed down and began to pray.
Now a video she posted on social media has made the artefact one of the latest targets for heritage activists sleuthing online to try to bring home some of the thousands of items whisked out over decades from the Himalayan country.
© PRAKASH MATHEMA Heritage expert Rabindra Puri campaigns to repatriate stolen Nepali heritageThe return journey has been made by only a handful of relics, but they have come from some of the world's top cultural institutions and pressure for more is mounting.
Nepal's then king offered the gilt copper necklace, adorned with semi-precious stones, to Taleju Bhawani, his Malla dynasty's patron goddess, in around 1650.
Her Kathmandu temple is only open to the public one day a year, but officials removed the work for safekeeping in the 1970s -- after which it disappeared.
Baniya told AFP her reaction when she visited the Chicago museum in June was "just overpowering".
"I started to weep in front of it," she said. "I started to just pray normally like I would do in temple.
"I had so many questions. Like why it is here, how did it come here?"
Nepal's then king offered the gilt copper necklace, adorned with semi-precious stones, to Taleju Bhawani, his Malla dynasty's patron goddess, in around 1650.
Her Kathmandu temple is only open to the public one day a year, but officials removed the work for safekeeping in the 1970s -- after which it disappeared.
Baniya told AFP her reaction when she visited the Chicago museum in June was "just overpowering".
"I started to weep in front of it," she said. "I started to just pray normally like I would do in temple.
"I had so many questions. Like why it is here, how did it come here?"
© PRAKASH MATHEMA Nepal is deeply religious and its Hindu and Buddhist temples and heritage sites remain an integral part of people's everyday livesTraces of vermilion pigment used in Hindu worship rituals are still visible on its surface, and Baniya's Twitter video prompted Nepali authorities to contact the museum to seek its return.
The Art Institute of Chicago did not respond to multiple requests for comment by AFP but its website states the necklace was donated by the private Alsdorf Foundation, which bought it from a California dealer in 1976.
Priest Udhav Kamacharya has served at the temple for 26 years but Baniya's footage was the first time he had seen the relic.
As he watched, he said: "I felt that the goddess still resides here.
"We sometimes say the gods are not here anymore, but they are. That is why it was found despite being in a foreign land."
- Opening up -
Nepal is deeply religious and its Hindu and Buddhist temples and heritage sites remain an integral part of people's everyday lives.
Many, though, are bereft of their centuries-old sculptures, paintings, ornamental windows and even doors, stolen -- sometimes with the assistance of corrupt officials -- after the country opened up to the outside world in the 1950s to feed art markets in the United States, Europe and elsewhere.
"Our art for us is not just art, they are gods to us," said heritage expert Rabindra Puri, who campaigns to repatriate stolen Nepali heritage and has assembled a collection of replicas for a planned museum on the issue.
In June, the Paris branch of auction house Bonhams was forced to cancel the sale of five gilded copper-bronze idols, wrenched out from the gateway of a temple in the 1970s, after pressure from Nepali officials and activists.
The auction was first spotted by Lost Art of Nepal, an anonymously-run Facebook page that has posted about hundreds of historical and religious objects, flagging their new locations from auction houses to European or American museums.
"We have seen empty temples, empty shrines, empty pedestals and torn toranas everywhere" in the Kathmandu valley, the page's administrator said in an email.
"In search for answers, I have collected old photographs from... (all) possible sources," they added. "The extent of loss of our heritage is much more than what is known or published."
- Androgynous idols -
Campaigners want to make stolen art -- thefts continue to this day, primarily from remote monasteries -- as sensitive an issue among buyers and collectors as conflict diamonds or elephant ivory.
With heritage repatriation a growing issue for museums around the world -- the ancient Greek Elgin Marbles and the Benin Bronzes from Nigeria are probably the best-known controversies -- the occasional Nepali recovery is building into a trickle.
Six pieces have been returned this year and authorities are seeking more from France, the United States and Britain.
In March, the Dallas Art Museum and the FBI returned to Nepal a stolen 12th- to 15th-century androgynous stone sculpture of Hindu deities Laxmi-Narayan.
This month it will be reinstalled in its original temple location, from where it disappeared in 1984.
The museum had held the statue for 30 years but a tweet by arts crime professor Erin L. Thompson questioning its provenance prompted an investigation.
"These are objects people were worshipping until it was ripped away from them," she said.
New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art handed over a 10th-century stone sculpture of the Hindu god Shiva in September, the third item it has repatriated to Nepal since 2018.
In Bhaktapur, devotees worship another androgynous Laxmi-Narayan idol, protected behind a locked iron gate.
Expecting mothers continue the ancient tradition of offering it oil to predict the gender of their baby.
But it is a replica. The 15th-century original went missing in the early 1980s.
Badri Tuwal, 70, remembers how residents cried in mourning the day the idol disappeared.
"We don't know where it is," he said, "but I hope someday we can celebrate its return."
pm/slb/je/qan
The Art Institute of Chicago did not respond to multiple requests for comment by AFP but its website states the necklace was donated by the private Alsdorf Foundation, which bought it from a California dealer in 1976.
Priest Udhav Kamacharya has served at the temple for 26 years but Baniya's footage was the first time he had seen the relic.
As he watched, he said: "I felt that the goddess still resides here.
"We sometimes say the gods are not here anymore, but they are. That is why it was found despite being in a foreign land."
- Opening up -
Nepal is deeply religious and its Hindu and Buddhist temples and heritage sites remain an integral part of people's everyday lives.
Many, though, are bereft of their centuries-old sculptures, paintings, ornamental windows and even doors, stolen -- sometimes with the assistance of corrupt officials -- after the country opened up to the outside world in the 1950s to feed art markets in the United States, Europe and elsewhere.
"Our art for us is not just art, they are gods to us," said heritage expert Rabindra Puri, who campaigns to repatriate stolen Nepali heritage and has assembled a collection of replicas for a planned museum on the issue.
In June, the Paris branch of auction house Bonhams was forced to cancel the sale of five gilded copper-bronze idols, wrenched out from the gateway of a temple in the 1970s, after pressure from Nepali officials and activists.
The auction was first spotted by Lost Art of Nepal, an anonymously-run Facebook page that has posted about hundreds of historical and religious objects, flagging their new locations from auction houses to European or American museums.
"We have seen empty temples, empty shrines, empty pedestals and torn toranas everywhere" in the Kathmandu valley, the page's administrator said in an email.
"In search for answers, I have collected old photographs from... (all) possible sources," they added. "The extent of loss of our heritage is much more than what is known or published."
- Androgynous idols -
Campaigners want to make stolen art -- thefts continue to this day, primarily from remote monasteries -- as sensitive an issue among buyers and collectors as conflict diamonds or elephant ivory.
With heritage repatriation a growing issue for museums around the world -- the ancient Greek Elgin Marbles and the Benin Bronzes from Nigeria are probably the best-known controversies -- the occasional Nepali recovery is building into a trickle.
Six pieces have been returned this year and authorities are seeking more from France, the United States and Britain.
In March, the Dallas Art Museum and the FBI returned to Nepal a stolen 12th- to 15th-century androgynous stone sculpture of Hindu deities Laxmi-Narayan.
This month it will be reinstalled in its original temple location, from where it disappeared in 1984.
The museum had held the statue for 30 years but a tweet by arts crime professor Erin L. Thompson questioning its provenance prompted an investigation.
"These are objects people were worshipping until it was ripped away from them," she said.
New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art handed over a 10th-century stone sculpture of the Hindu god Shiva in September, the third item it has repatriated to Nepal since 2018.
In Bhaktapur, devotees worship another androgynous Laxmi-Narayan idol, protected behind a locked iron gate.
Expecting mothers continue the ancient tradition of offering it oil to predict the gender of their baby.
But it is a replica. The 15th-century original went missing in the early 1980s.
Badri Tuwal, 70, remembers how residents cried in mourning the day the idol disappeared.
"We don't know where it is," he said, "but I hope someday we can celebrate its return."
pm/slb/je/qan
THE MOONSTONE WILKIE COLLINS
Climate change 2021: There's no turning back now
Fossil fuels are the main driver of global warming (AFP/Ben STANSALL)
in the 11th hour, China and the US sealed the deal at COP26 (AFP/Ben STANSALL)
2021 saw a cascade of climate-enhanced fires, floods and heatwaves across four continents (AFP/ANGELOS TZORTZINIS)
Climate change 2021: There's no turning back now
China's per capita greenhouse gas emissions now exceed Europe's (AFP/Sabrina BLANCHARD)
Climate change 2021: There's no turning back now
Human rights activists hold placards in Lahore on November 8 during a protest in connection with the COP26 UN Climate Change Conference (AFP/Arif ALI)
A flash flood caused by Tropical Storm Henri makes landfall, in Helmetta, New Jersey in August 2021 (AFP/Tom Brenner)
Annual carbon emissions worldwide by type of fossil energy since 1959 (AFP/Cléa PÉCULIER)
Marlowe HOOD
Mon, November 29, 2021
Across a quarter century of UN climate conferences tasked with saving humanity from itself, one was deemed a chaotic failure (Copenhagen/2009), another a stunning success (Paris/2015), and the rest landed somewhere in between.
This year's COP26 inspired all these reactions at once.
Swedish activist Greta Thunberg, leading a 100,000-strong march through the streets of Glasgow, dismissed the two-week meet as a "greenwashing festival".
But dedicated experts in the negotiating arena hailed solid -- even historic -- advances in beating back the existential threat of global warming.
More often than not, observers vacillated between approval and criticism, hope and despair.
"The Glasgow Climate Pact is more than we expected, but less than we hoped for," Dann Mitchell, head of climate hazards at Britain's Met Office, said with Haiku-like economy.
Gauging the efficacy of measures announced at the COP26 summit largely depends on the yardstick used to measure them.
Compared to what came before, the first-ever call by 196 countries to draw down coal-fired power, or a promise to double financial aid each year -- to roughly $40 billion -- so poor nations can brace for climate impacts, are giant steps forward.
Likewise a provision obliging countries to consider setting more ambitious targets for reducing carbon pollution every year rather than once every five years.
But all these hard-won gains at COP26 shrivel in signficance when stacked up against hard science.
- Glasgow exit lane -
An unbroken cascade in 2021 of deadly floods, heatwaves and wildfires across four continents, combined with ever more detailed projections, left no doubt that going beyond the 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.6 degrees Farenheit) heating limit envisioned in the Paris Agreement would push Earth into the red zone.
"As a lifelong optimist, I see the Glasgow outcome as half-full rather than half-empty," said Alden Meyer, a senior analyst at climate and energy think tank E3G.
"But the atmosphere responds to emissions -- not COP decisions -- and much work remains ahead to translate the strong rhetoric here into reality."
2021 also saw Part 1 of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) first comprehensive synthesis of climate science in seven years.
It found that global heating is virtually certain to pass 1.5C, probably within a decade. Meanwhile, ocean levels are rising faster than anticipated, and will do so for centuries.
And forests, soil and oceans -- which absorb more than half of humanity's carbon pollution -- show signs of saturation.
Then there is the threat of "tipping points" that could see permafrost release massive amounts of CO2 and methane, the Amazon basin transformed into savannah, and ice sheets shedding enough mass to submerge cities and deltas home to hundreds of millions.
"Make no mistake, we are still on the road to hell," said Dave Reay, head of the University of Edinburgh's Climate Change Institute.
"But Glasgow has at least created an exit lane."
- Permanent breaking story -
Part 2 of the IPCC report on climate impacts, seen exclusively by AFP ahead of its February 2022 publication, reveals another yawning gap between the baby steps of COP26 and what is needed in the long term.
Helping vulnerable nations cope, to the multiplier effect of global heating on extreme weather could soon require trillions of dollars per year, not the tens of billions put on the table at COP26, a draft version of the report makes clear.
"Adaptation costs are significantly higher than previously estimated, resulting in a growing 'adaptation finance gap'," said an executive summary of the 4,000-page report.
The failure of rich nations to deliver $100 billion a year by 2020 to help developing countries makes it hard to imagine where these trillions will come from.
Glasgow marked the transition from fleshing out the rules for the 2015 Paris treaty to implementing its provisions.
But unlike the aftermath of other major COPs, the climate crisis will remain front-and-centre, and this permanent breaking story is not going to recede into the background anytime soon.
How that saga unfolds will depend a lot on the world's four major emitters, collectively responsible for 60 percent of global carbon pollution.
The United States and the European Union have pledged carbon neutrality by 2050 and recently set more ambitious emissions reduction targets for 2030, but refused to set up a fund demanded by more than 130 developing countries to help pay for climate damage already incurred.
- All sectors, all countries -
China and India -- accounting for 38 percent of global emissions in 2021, and rising -- have resisted pressure to foreswear fossil fuels.
Beijing has steadfastly refused to do what scientists say is doable and necessary to stay under 2C: peak their emissions far earlier than 2030.
If climate politics remain stymied, however, global capital is already flowing into what some have called the most massive economic transformation in human history.
In Glasgow, former Bank of England governor Mark Carney boasted that nearly 500 banks, insurers and asset managers worth $130 trillion were ready to finance climate action.
"If we only had to transform one sector, or move one country off fossil fuels, we would have done so long ago," commented Christiana Figueres, who headed the UN climate convention when the Paris deal was struck.
"But all sectors of the global economy have to be decarbonised, and all countries must switch to clean technologies."
Where some of that money might flow -- and who might get left out -- has also come into focus, with major investment deals announced for South Africa, and others in the pipeline for emerging economies such as Indonesia and Vietnam.
But there is little incentive for private capital to help the poorest and most climate vulnerable countries to cope with climate ravages and shore up their defences.
"We cannot just wait for open market incentives to have their way, we need to set prices on carbon globally, we need to set science-based targets that become climate laws," said Johan Rockstrom, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.
mh/pvh/ser
Fossil fuels are the main driver of global warming (AFP/Ben STANSALL)
in the 11th hour, China and the US sealed the deal at COP26 (AFP/Ben STANSALL)
2021 saw a cascade of climate-enhanced fires, floods and heatwaves across four continents (AFP/ANGELOS TZORTZINIS)
Climate change 2021: There's no turning back now
China's per capita greenhouse gas emissions now exceed Europe's (AFP/Sabrina BLANCHARD)
Climate change 2021: There's no turning back now
Human rights activists hold placards in Lahore on November 8 during a protest in connection with the COP26 UN Climate Change Conference (AFP/Arif ALI)
A flash flood caused by Tropical Storm Henri makes landfall, in Helmetta, New Jersey in August 2021 (AFP/Tom Brenner)
Annual carbon emissions worldwide by type of fossil energy since 1959 (AFP/Cléa PÉCULIER)
Marlowe HOOD
Mon, November 29, 2021
Across a quarter century of UN climate conferences tasked with saving humanity from itself, one was deemed a chaotic failure (Copenhagen/2009), another a stunning success (Paris/2015), and the rest landed somewhere in between.
This year's COP26 inspired all these reactions at once.
Swedish activist Greta Thunberg, leading a 100,000-strong march through the streets of Glasgow, dismissed the two-week meet as a "greenwashing festival".
But dedicated experts in the negotiating arena hailed solid -- even historic -- advances in beating back the existential threat of global warming.
More often than not, observers vacillated between approval and criticism, hope and despair.
"The Glasgow Climate Pact is more than we expected, but less than we hoped for," Dann Mitchell, head of climate hazards at Britain's Met Office, said with Haiku-like economy.
Gauging the efficacy of measures announced at the COP26 summit largely depends on the yardstick used to measure them.
Compared to what came before, the first-ever call by 196 countries to draw down coal-fired power, or a promise to double financial aid each year -- to roughly $40 billion -- so poor nations can brace for climate impacts, are giant steps forward.
Likewise a provision obliging countries to consider setting more ambitious targets for reducing carbon pollution every year rather than once every five years.
But all these hard-won gains at COP26 shrivel in signficance when stacked up against hard science.
- Glasgow exit lane -
An unbroken cascade in 2021 of deadly floods, heatwaves and wildfires across four continents, combined with ever more detailed projections, left no doubt that going beyond the 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.6 degrees Farenheit) heating limit envisioned in the Paris Agreement would push Earth into the red zone.
"As a lifelong optimist, I see the Glasgow outcome as half-full rather than half-empty," said Alden Meyer, a senior analyst at climate and energy think tank E3G.
"But the atmosphere responds to emissions -- not COP decisions -- and much work remains ahead to translate the strong rhetoric here into reality."
2021 also saw Part 1 of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) first comprehensive synthesis of climate science in seven years.
It found that global heating is virtually certain to pass 1.5C, probably within a decade. Meanwhile, ocean levels are rising faster than anticipated, and will do so for centuries.
And forests, soil and oceans -- which absorb more than half of humanity's carbon pollution -- show signs of saturation.
Then there is the threat of "tipping points" that could see permafrost release massive amounts of CO2 and methane, the Amazon basin transformed into savannah, and ice sheets shedding enough mass to submerge cities and deltas home to hundreds of millions.
"Make no mistake, we are still on the road to hell," said Dave Reay, head of the University of Edinburgh's Climate Change Institute.
"But Glasgow has at least created an exit lane."
- Permanent breaking story -
Part 2 of the IPCC report on climate impacts, seen exclusively by AFP ahead of its February 2022 publication, reveals another yawning gap between the baby steps of COP26 and what is needed in the long term.
Helping vulnerable nations cope, to the multiplier effect of global heating on extreme weather could soon require trillions of dollars per year, not the tens of billions put on the table at COP26, a draft version of the report makes clear.
"Adaptation costs are significantly higher than previously estimated, resulting in a growing 'adaptation finance gap'," said an executive summary of the 4,000-page report.
The failure of rich nations to deliver $100 billion a year by 2020 to help developing countries makes it hard to imagine where these trillions will come from.
Glasgow marked the transition from fleshing out the rules for the 2015 Paris treaty to implementing its provisions.
But unlike the aftermath of other major COPs, the climate crisis will remain front-and-centre, and this permanent breaking story is not going to recede into the background anytime soon.
How that saga unfolds will depend a lot on the world's four major emitters, collectively responsible for 60 percent of global carbon pollution.
The United States and the European Union have pledged carbon neutrality by 2050 and recently set more ambitious emissions reduction targets for 2030, but refused to set up a fund demanded by more than 130 developing countries to help pay for climate damage already incurred.
- All sectors, all countries -
China and India -- accounting for 38 percent of global emissions in 2021, and rising -- have resisted pressure to foreswear fossil fuels.
Beijing has steadfastly refused to do what scientists say is doable and necessary to stay under 2C: peak their emissions far earlier than 2030.
If climate politics remain stymied, however, global capital is already flowing into what some have called the most massive economic transformation in human history.
In Glasgow, former Bank of England governor Mark Carney boasted that nearly 500 banks, insurers and asset managers worth $130 trillion were ready to finance climate action.
"If we only had to transform one sector, or move one country off fossil fuels, we would have done so long ago," commented Christiana Figueres, who headed the UN climate convention when the Paris deal was struck.
"But all sectors of the global economy have to be decarbonised, and all countries must switch to clean technologies."
Where some of that money might flow -- and who might get left out -- has also come into focus, with major investment deals announced for South Africa, and others in the pipeline for emerging economies such as Indonesia and Vietnam.
But there is little incentive for private capital to help the poorest and most climate vulnerable countries to cope with climate ravages and shore up their defences.
"We cannot just wait for open market incentives to have their way, we need to set prices on carbon globally, we need to set science-based targets that become climate laws," said Johan Rockstrom, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.
mh/pvh/ser
'One in three' Australian parliament staff sexually harassed
Former government staffer Brittany Higgins speaks before protesters during a rally against sexual violence in Canberra on March 15, 2021. (AFP/Saeed KHAN)
Mon, November 29, 2021, 10:15 PM·1 min read
Sexual harassment and bullying are widespread in Australia's parliament, affecting both lawmakers and staff, a high-profile inquiry into the institution's "sexist culture" has found.
After a seven-month investigation, a government-backed report on Tuesday said one in three people currently working at parliament "have experienced some form of sexual harassment while working there".
That included 63 percent of the country's female parliamentarians.
"Aspiring male politicians who thought nothing of, in one case, picking you up, kissing you on the lips, lifting you up, touching you, pats on the bottom, comments about appearance, you know, the usual... the culture allowed it," said one of the report's 1,700 interviewees.
The report made 28 recommendations, including a formal statement of acknowledgement by political leaders, targets to increase gender diversity and "a proactive focus on safety and wellbeing".
It was launched amid widespread outrage at the alleged rape of parliamentary staffer Brittany Higgins inside a minister's office, after a night out with conservative Liberal Party colleagues.
Her allegations -- which are still before the court -- fuelled nationwide demonstrations and demands for reform.
Higgins on Tuesday welcomed the report and thanked "the many brave people who shared their stories which contributed to this review".
"I hope all sides of politics not only commit to but implement these recommendations in full," she said in a statement sent via the Australian National University, where she is now a visiting fellow.
Greens' Senator Sarah Hanson-Young described the report as a "damning expose of the sexist culture and harassment in politics".
"The statistics and comments are shocking, but for many women here they are not surprising and ring true to our own experiences," she said.
arb/djw/leg
Former government staffer Brittany Higgins speaks before protesters during a rally against sexual violence in Canberra on March 15, 2021. (AFP/Saeed KHAN)
Mon, November 29, 2021, 10:15 PM·1 min read
Sexual harassment and bullying are widespread in Australia's parliament, affecting both lawmakers and staff, a high-profile inquiry into the institution's "sexist culture" has found.
After a seven-month investigation, a government-backed report on Tuesday said one in three people currently working at parliament "have experienced some form of sexual harassment while working there".
That included 63 percent of the country's female parliamentarians.
"Aspiring male politicians who thought nothing of, in one case, picking you up, kissing you on the lips, lifting you up, touching you, pats on the bottom, comments about appearance, you know, the usual... the culture allowed it," said one of the report's 1,700 interviewees.
The report made 28 recommendations, including a formal statement of acknowledgement by political leaders, targets to increase gender diversity and "a proactive focus on safety and wellbeing".
It was launched amid widespread outrage at the alleged rape of parliamentary staffer Brittany Higgins inside a minister's office, after a night out with conservative Liberal Party colleagues.
Her allegations -- which are still before the court -- fuelled nationwide demonstrations and demands for reform.
Higgins on Tuesday welcomed the report and thanked "the many brave people who shared their stories which contributed to this review".
"I hope all sides of politics not only commit to but implement these recommendations in full," she said in a statement sent via the Australian National University, where she is now a visiting fellow.
Greens' Senator Sarah Hanson-Young described the report as a "damning expose of the sexist culture and harassment in politics".
"The statistics and comments are shocking, but for many women here they are not surprising and ring true to our own experiences," she said.
arb/djw/leg
French minister in talks with unions on troubled Caribbean islands
French Overseas Minister Sebastien Lecornu is visiting the Caribbean islands of Guadeloupe and Martinique over ways to end more than a week of violent protests (AFP/Christophe ARCHAMBAULT)
Nicolas KIENAST, Amandine ASCENSIO
Mon, November 29, 2021, 10:42 PM·3 min read
France's minister for overseas territories left the Caribbean island of Guadeloupe Monday night at an impasse over ways to end more than a week of violent protests sparked by Covid-19 restrictions.
Before departing for more talks in neighbouring Martinique, Sebastien Lecornu told reporters that the Guadeloupe negotiations had been deadlocked over the "obvious and indispensable" demand that the various unions condemn the violence.
Discussions were not possible so long as the unions "do not want to condemn assassination attempts" against security forces, he said.
Unrest in the former colonial outpost began with a protest over compulsory Covid-19 vaccinations for health workers, but quickly ballooned into a broader revolt over living conditions, and spread to next door Martinique.
Both islands are now under curfew.
In the French overseas territories, each of which has close to 400,000 inhabitants, residents complain of greater poverty, higher costs for basic goods and poorer public services than on the mainland.
Lecornu said his talks with four union representatives in Guadeloupe were limited to the receipt of a list of demands.
Maite Hubert-M'Toumo, secretary general of Guadeloupe's main trade union UGTG, said the requests include a suspension of the vaccine mandate for health professionals, no convictions for protesters over the violence and improvement of living conditions for Guadeloupean families.
Lecornu, who laid responsibility for some of the issues at the feet of local elected officials, said he expects to make better headway in Martinique where the "republican prerequisite" for negotiations has already been met.
- More autonomy? -
The explosion of unrest on the islands has put the fate of overseas territories on the agenda of the campaign heading into 2022 elections, with President Emmanuel Macron's opponents accusing him of neglecting the former colonial outposts.
Ahead of his visit, Lecornu had floated the possibility of giving Guadeloupe, the more troubled of the two territories, more autonomy.
His proposal drew fire from the opposition, with centre-right presidential hopeful Xavier Bertrand accusing the government of being ready to let France "be broken up" and far-right leader Marine Le Pen accusing Lecornu of trying to "buy off" hardline pro-independence groups.
Lecornu's remarks also received a lukewarm response from lawmakers in Guadeloupe, who said the immediate priority was tackling high levels of youth unemployment and other social problems.
On his arrival in Guadeloupe on Sunday, Lecornu vowed to stand firm on the obligation for health workers and first responders to be vaccinated against Covid by December 31 or face suspension without pay. But he insisted he was open to dialogue on other issues.
The vaccine mandate for health workers, which was enforced in September on the mainland, has met with greater resistance in Guadeloupe and Martinique, where vaccine hesitancy is high.
Protesters barricaded roads with burning tyres or taxis and hurled petrol bombs at the security forces in some of the worst unrest in the islands in years.
In Martinique, several businesses were looted and five police officers were injured by gunfire.
Calm had been largely restored by the weekend, however, with only minor skirmishes reported.
France lost most of its overseas possessions around 60 years ago, when its African colonies declared independence, a few years after French territories in Southeast Asia.
But Paris still retains control over 12 territories in the Indian and Pacific Oceans, as well as in the Caribbean, that are home to a total of 2.6 million people.
While some, like Guadeloupe and Martinique, have the same status as regions on the mainland, others, such as French Polynesia, have already been granted autonomy.
The Pacific islands of New Caledonia are to vote next month in the third of three independence referendums.
bur-nk/cb/sjw/mbx/lb/jfx
French Overseas Minister Sebastien Lecornu is visiting the Caribbean islands of Guadeloupe and Martinique over ways to end more than a week of violent protests (AFP/Christophe ARCHAMBAULT)
Nicolas KIENAST, Amandine ASCENSIO
Mon, November 29, 2021, 10:42 PM·3 min read
France's minister for overseas territories left the Caribbean island of Guadeloupe Monday night at an impasse over ways to end more than a week of violent protests sparked by Covid-19 restrictions.
Before departing for more talks in neighbouring Martinique, Sebastien Lecornu told reporters that the Guadeloupe negotiations had been deadlocked over the "obvious and indispensable" demand that the various unions condemn the violence.
Discussions were not possible so long as the unions "do not want to condemn assassination attempts" against security forces, he said.
Unrest in the former colonial outpost began with a protest over compulsory Covid-19 vaccinations for health workers, but quickly ballooned into a broader revolt over living conditions, and spread to next door Martinique.
Both islands are now under curfew.
In the French overseas territories, each of which has close to 400,000 inhabitants, residents complain of greater poverty, higher costs for basic goods and poorer public services than on the mainland.
Lecornu said his talks with four union representatives in Guadeloupe were limited to the receipt of a list of demands.
Maite Hubert-M'Toumo, secretary general of Guadeloupe's main trade union UGTG, said the requests include a suspension of the vaccine mandate for health professionals, no convictions for protesters over the violence and improvement of living conditions for Guadeloupean families.
Lecornu, who laid responsibility for some of the issues at the feet of local elected officials, said he expects to make better headway in Martinique where the "republican prerequisite" for negotiations has already been met.
- More autonomy? -
The explosion of unrest on the islands has put the fate of overseas territories on the agenda of the campaign heading into 2022 elections, with President Emmanuel Macron's opponents accusing him of neglecting the former colonial outposts.
Ahead of his visit, Lecornu had floated the possibility of giving Guadeloupe, the more troubled of the two territories, more autonomy.
His proposal drew fire from the opposition, with centre-right presidential hopeful Xavier Bertrand accusing the government of being ready to let France "be broken up" and far-right leader Marine Le Pen accusing Lecornu of trying to "buy off" hardline pro-independence groups.
Lecornu's remarks also received a lukewarm response from lawmakers in Guadeloupe, who said the immediate priority was tackling high levels of youth unemployment and other social problems.
On his arrival in Guadeloupe on Sunday, Lecornu vowed to stand firm on the obligation for health workers and first responders to be vaccinated against Covid by December 31 or face suspension without pay. But he insisted he was open to dialogue on other issues.
The vaccine mandate for health workers, which was enforced in September on the mainland, has met with greater resistance in Guadeloupe and Martinique, where vaccine hesitancy is high.
Protesters barricaded roads with burning tyres or taxis and hurled petrol bombs at the security forces in some of the worst unrest in the islands in years.
In Martinique, several businesses were looted and five police officers were injured by gunfire.
Calm had been largely restored by the weekend, however, with only minor skirmishes reported.
France lost most of its overseas possessions around 60 years ago, when its African colonies declared independence, a few years after French territories in Southeast Asia.
But Paris still retains control over 12 territories in the Indian and Pacific Oceans, as well as in the Caribbean, that are home to a total of 2.6 million people.
While some, like Guadeloupe and Martinique, have the same status as regions on the mainland, others, such as French Polynesia, have already been granted autonomy.
The Pacific islands of New Caledonia are to vote next month in the third of three independence referendums.
bur-nk/cb/sjw/mbx/lb/jfx
Chile lawmakers set to approve same-sex marriage bill
The Iguales Fundation LGBT rights group demonstrated outside the Constituent Assembly in Santiago, Chile, on November 29, 2021, ahead of a Senate vote to approve a bill legalizing same-sex marriage (AFP/MARTIN BERNETTI)
Alberto PEÑA
Mon, November 29, 2021
Chile's parliament is set to approve a long-awaited bill to legalize same-sex marriage Tuesday, joining just a handful of countries in majority Catholic Latin America with similar laws.
The bill will also enable married same-sex couples to adopt children.
Chile, which legalized same-sex civil unions in 2015, has been awaiting this bill since 2017, when it was sent to congress by socialist then-president Michelle Bachelet.
In a surprise move, her conservative successor, Sebastian Pinera, announced in June he would seek the bill's urgent passage through parliament.
It was given the go-ahead by the lower house, or Chamber of Deputies, earlier this month, and must now be approved by the upper house, or Senate, before finally being signed into law by Pinera.
"We want to insist that this bill should become law right now. There can no longer be excuses for continuing to drag out the discussion in congress while hundreds of families wait anxiously," said Isabel Amor of the Fundacion Iguales LGBT rights group.
"Love does not discriminate, but the law does," added Lorena Grez, who with other activists delivered 20,000 signatures in support of the new law.
"In Chile we are not recognized as a family," but rather are treated as "second-class" citizens, she said.
Same-sex marriage is legal in six Latin American and Caribbean countries -- Costa Rica, Ecuador, Colombia, Brazil, Uruguay and Argentina, as well as in 14 of Mexico's 32 states.
The Senate hearing on the bill will be preceded by a decision of a constitutional commission, a step which could see the vote delayed by hours, or perhaps to another day.
The project has been consistently opposed by the most conservative bloc of Chile's ruling right wing, but has nevertheless obtained a majority "yes" vote at every step of the process to date in an opposition-dominated congress.
On Monday, the Movilh LGBT rights group released the results of a survey in which 82.8 percent of same-sex couples, among 1,878 people interviewed, said they planned to marry once it is legal.
The issue deeply divides the two candidates headed for a presidential run-off on December 19.
Gabriel Boric, 35, who represents a leftist alliance that includes the Communist Party, supported the bill and voted "yes" in his capacity as lawmaker.
But 55-year-old, far-right candidate Jose Antonio Kast, who won 28 percent of first-round votes compared to Boric's 26 percent, campaigned against it.
apg/pa/mlr/sw
The Iguales Fundation LGBT rights group demonstrated outside the Constituent Assembly in Santiago, Chile, on November 29, 2021, ahead of a Senate vote to approve a bill legalizing same-sex marriage (AFP/MARTIN BERNETTI)
Alberto PEÑA
Mon, November 29, 2021
Chile's parliament is set to approve a long-awaited bill to legalize same-sex marriage Tuesday, joining just a handful of countries in majority Catholic Latin America with similar laws.
The bill will also enable married same-sex couples to adopt children.
Chile, which legalized same-sex civil unions in 2015, has been awaiting this bill since 2017, when it was sent to congress by socialist then-president Michelle Bachelet.
In a surprise move, her conservative successor, Sebastian Pinera, announced in June he would seek the bill's urgent passage through parliament.
It was given the go-ahead by the lower house, or Chamber of Deputies, earlier this month, and must now be approved by the upper house, or Senate, before finally being signed into law by Pinera.
"We want to insist that this bill should become law right now. There can no longer be excuses for continuing to drag out the discussion in congress while hundreds of families wait anxiously," said Isabel Amor of the Fundacion Iguales LGBT rights group.
"Love does not discriminate, but the law does," added Lorena Grez, who with other activists delivered 20,000 signatures in support of the new law.
"In Chile we are not recognized as a family," but rather are treated as "second-class" citizens, she said.
Same-sex marriage is legal in six Latin American and Caribbean countries -- Costa Rica, Ecuador, Colombia, Brazil, Uruguay and Argentina, as well as in 14 of Mexico's 32 states.
The Senate hearing on the bill will be preceded by a decision of a constitutional commission, a step which could see the vote delayed by hours, or perhaps to another day.
The project has been consistently opposed by the most conservative bloc of Chile's ruling right wing, but has nevertheless obtained a majority "yes" vote at every step of the process to date in an opposition-dominated congress.
On Monday, the Movilh LGBT rights group released the results of a survey in which 82.8 percent of same-sex couples, among 1,878 people interviewed, said they planned to marry once it is legal.
The issue deeply divides the two candidates headed for a presidential run-off on December 19.
Gabriel Boric, 35, who represents a leftist alliance that includes the Communist Party, supported the bill and voted "yes" in his capacity as lawmaker.
But 55-year-old, far-right candidate Jose Antonio Kast, who won 28 percent of first-round votes compared to Boric's 26 percent, campaigned against it.
apg/pa/mlr/sw
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)