Sunday, December 12, 2021

The Famed Mosin Rifle Haunts the Russian Army

Recently, the Mosin was spotted in the hands of separatist forces in the Donbass region of Ukraine.

Here's What You Need to Know: Well into the twenty-first century, the Mosin soldiers on.



December 11, 2021
 by Kyle Mizokami




One of the most widely used weapons of the twentieth century was the predecessor to the legendary AK-47 rifle. Developed at the end of the nineteenth century for the Czar’s armies, the Mosin Nagant infantry rifle ended up becoming the standard issue weapon of the new Soviet Union. An unassuming but accurate and reliable weapon, the “Mosin” served well into the twenty-first century, making it one of the few weapons to see continuous service over the span of three centuries.

In the late nineteenth century, Russia’s large land army grew increasingly dissatisfied with its arsenal of obsolete rifles. The standard issue rifle was the Berdan II, a single-shot rifle that fired the 10.7x58mmR bottle-neck black powder cartridge. This arrangement greatly limited the firepower of Russian infantrymen, who needed to load a fresh cartridge after every shot. The Berdan II was also large and heavy, weighing 9.3 pounds with an overall length of 51 inches.

New technologies promised a huge technological shift in small arms already underway in the West. A move away from black powder to more modern propellants would produce higher chamber pressures. This in turn would allow higher projectile velocities while at the same time allowing for a reduction in the size of the bullet. A fixed steel magazine could hold up to five metallic cartridges, eliminating the need for reloading after every shot. The result would be a smaller, lighter, faster-firing rifle.

By the 1880s, the Russian Army had commissioned the development of a new infantry rifle. Sergei Ivanovich Mosin, a Czarist Army soldier and engineer, set to work on the rifle design. His rifle was a simple bolt-action rifle that relied upon an internal magazine. Leon Nagant, a Belgian weapons designer, contributed to the weapon’s feeding system. A contributing but outside factor was the invention of Russian smokeless powder by chemist Dmitri Mendeleev, which was used in the new Russian 7.62x54R rimmed rifle cartridge.

All of these advances added up to the development of the “Three Line Rifle, Model of 1891”—better known as the Mosin Nagant rifle. The Mosin was adopted by the Russian Army in 1891. The rifle weighed 8.8 pounds and was 48.5 inches long, making it slightly easier to carry than the Berdan II.

The rifle went into mass production and, by 1904, three million rifles were in Russian Army service. The Mosin was first used by the Russian Army during the Boxer Rebellion, then by the Russian Army in the 1904-1905 Russo-Japanese War. Next the weapon served on the Eastern Front in World War I, and then on both sides during the Russian Civil War.

The end of Imperial Russia and the establishment of the USSR meant little to the Mosin. In 1930, Red Army engineers shortened it a few inches, calibrated the sights in meters, and built it with cylindrical as opposed to hexagonal receivers. Moscow named the new, slightly upgraded rifle the Model 91/30, and the rifle was the Soviet Army’s standard infantry arm throughout World War II.

World War II was the high point of Mosin production, as the Red Army struggled to arm millions of conscripts annually. Equipped with the PU rifle scope, the Mosin was accurate enough to serve as a sniper rifle on the Eastern Front. The last official version of the Mosin was the Model 1944 carbine. Ten inches shorter than the standard 91/30, the Model 1944 was also lighter and featured a folding bayonet.

The end of the Second World War and the adoption of the AK-47 in 1947 marked a new chapter in the Mosin’s history. Although the Soviets no longer had any use for a bolt-action rifle, revolutionary socialist movements around the world did, and the USSR exported large numbers abroad. The Mosin appeared in the hands of the Korean People’s Army during the Korean War, the Viet Minh during the war in French Indochina, the Viet Cong during the Vietnam War, and armies in South America, Africa and elsewhere. The Mosin even appeared in the hands of anti-Soviet insurgents, including the 1956 Hungarian uprising and the 1979-1988 Afghan War.

Even now, well into the twenty-first century, the Mosin soldiers on. Recently, the Mosin was spotted in the hands of separatist forces in the Donbass region of Ukraine. The Russian 7.62x54R cartridge, first developed in 1890, is still used today in the Russian Army’s PK medium machine guns. This allows the machine guns to access vast stocks of already manufactured (and paid for) ammunition. While the Mosin itself may no longer be in service, clues to its existence will likely haunt the Russian Army for decades to come.

Kyle Mizokami is a defense and national-security writer based in San Francisco who has appeared in the Diplomat, Foreign Policy, War is Boring and the Daily Beast. In 2009 he co-founded the defense and security blog Japan Security Watch. You can follow him on Twitter: @KyleMizokami.

WW3.0
War-weariness in Russia as military tension with Ukraine rises

Russia's troop buildup on the Ukrainian border is not just a message to Kyiv and its NATO partners. The show of force is also aimed at a domestic audience. But at home, that message may be falling on deaf ears.


Russians see themselves as one with Ukrainians but are tired of ambitious foreign conflicts that bring sanctions and isolation


Moscow's Kyivsky metro station is decorated with elaborate murals showing how Ukrainians joined the Soviet Union. It is a celebration of unity. But today, Moscow and Kyiv feel more divided than ever.

Recently, Western intelligence officials warned that Russia has stationed about 70,000 troops near its border to Ukraine and that Russian President Vladimir Putin could be planning an invasion early next year.

Outside Kyivsky station, travelers and commuters pause for fresh air, or for a cigarette. To most people in the Russian capital, rising tensions at the border feel very far away.

"We Russians don't want war — no one does. The Ukrainians are the same people as us, a Slavic people — our friends," one young woman tells DW, pulling the shawl on her head tighter against the cold. "But everything is decided by politicians from above — without us."

In 2014, Russia annexed the Crimean peninsula from Ukraine. Moscow has also been supporting separatists fighting in eastern Ukraine — though Russian officials have denied direct involvement. More than 14,000 people have died in the conflict.

"During the Soviet Union we all lived together just fine," an older man in a fur hat says, adding that he has Belarusian and Polish roots. "Then everything fell apart."

Passengers and commuters outside Moscow's Kievsky station say they don't want war with Ukraine

A complicated history


The idea that Ukrainians and Russians are "a brother nation" is common in Russia. That makes the ongoing conflict in eastern Ukraine emotional for many — and different from other wars fought between ethnic groups in the post-Soviet space, like the recent fighting over Nagorno-Karbakh for example.

Today, at least 2 million Ukrainians live in Russia, and there are hundreds of family ties between the two nations. Many Russians actually see Kyiv as the birthplace of the Russian nation, as today's Ukrainian capital was the center of Kyivan Rus, a medieval federation of Slavic peoples.

In an essay published in July, Russian President Vladimir Putin went so far as to argue that Russians and Ukrainians are "one people" — and that it is the West that is driving a wedge between the nations.


This week, Vladimir Putin spoke with US President Joe Biden via video link amid rising tensions over Ukraine

Moscow's red lines

Now, Putin is using his military to express a renewed fixation on Ukraine — the recent troop buildup is the second this year. Rather than stemming from a diffuse sense of nostalgia for past unity, many Russia analysts argue that saber-rattling over Ukraine has become a strategy for Putin.

"The Kremlin believes that the West completely ignores Russian interests when Russia uses the language of diplomacy," Dmitri Trenin, the head of the Carnegie Moscow Center, tells DW. "It seems that now Russia has been using military instruments as a means to move diplomacy forward."

The current troop buildup on the Ukrainian border and another earlier this year both got Putin meetings with US President Joe Biden. After a bilateral summit in June, this week the Russian president spoke to his US counterpart via secure video meeting.

Putin has insisted that Ukraine joining the NATO military alliance would cross a "red line"
for Russia, and he is demanding guarantees that NATO will not expand further eastward — including by giving Ukraine membership. Both the Carnegie's Trenin and political analyst Konstantin Kalachev argue that the Russian president sees NATO as a real threat — especially with recent NATO and US military drills in the Black Sea near the annexed Crimean peninsula, which Russia considers its territory.

"Putin wants two things: stability and sovereignty," Kalachev tells DW, explaining that he sees NATO as a threat to both.

In a boisterous move, Putin traveled to the annexed Crimean peninsula for Russia's National Unity Day celebrations this year


A new Crimea?

But Russia's military movements near Ukraine are also aimed at a domestic audience, according to political analyst and former Putin speechwriter Abbas Gallyamov. After all, the annexation of the Crimean peninsula in 2014 led to a huge spike in Vladimir Putin's popularity (88% at the time). Gallyamov says the current situation shows Putin doesn't want his supporters to think he is "not who he used to be," or showing weakness over Ukraine.

But the analyst does not think a full-scale invasion of neighboring Ukraine would be a popular move at home.

"Russians already know that international victories don't just lead to a sense of national pride but are also followed by crackdown at home and falling living standards." The takeover of Crimea six years ago isolated Russia internationally, leading to US and EU sanctions and tense relations with the West.

Ukrainian soldiers and Russian-backed separatists have been fighting in Eastern Ukraine since 2014

Stability and sovereignty

Stepan Goncharov, a sociologist from the Levada Center, an independent polling outfit, argues that for most Russians, the last few years have already made them feel like they were living in a "state of war."

"This sense of constant tension has started to weigh on people. Before, the topic [of war] was something new, it returned a sense of belonging to an empire, part of a strong, great nation," Goncharov says of the conflict in Ukraine and Russia's involvement in the war in Syria. "Now people would rather live in a less [internationally] ambitious country that is more generous with its citizens, a more stable, predictable and economically affluent country."

Edited by: Jon Shelton
Ukrainian president does not exclude referendum on Crimea and Donbas 
RUSSIA HELD ITS OWN IN 2014

 In Kyiv Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy speaks by phone 
with U.S. President Joe Biden

Fri, December 10, 2021
By Natalia Zinets

KYIV (Reuters) -Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday said he did not exclude holding a referendum on the future status of war-torn eastern Ukraine and the Crimea peninsula annexed by Russia in 2014.

Zelenskiy did not give detail on how and when a referendum could be held, but said it was one of the options to revive a stalled peace process in eastern Ukraine and end a standoff with neighbouring Russia.

Ukraine has scrambled to shore up support from Western allies in recent weeks, accusing Russia of massing tens of thousands of troops near its borders in preparation for a possible large scale military offensive.

Relations between Kyiv and Moscow collapsed after Russia annexed Crimea in 2014 and Moscow-backed forces seized territory in eastern Ukraine that Kyiv wants back. Kyiv says some 14,000 people have been killed in fighting since then.

"I do not rule out a referendum on Donbass in general," Zelenskiy told the 1+1 television channel. "It might be about Donbass, it might be about Crimea, it might be about ending the war in general," he said. "So it may be that someone, this or that country can offer us certain conditions."

Zelenskiy has welcomed U.S. President Joe Biden taking a "personal role" in trying to end the war in eastern Ukraine. Zelenskiy said Biden had conveyed Russian reassurances that Moscow would not cause an escalation.

Zelenskiy also said he would not rule out direct talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Russia demanded on Friday that NATO rescind a 2008 commitment to Ukraine and Georgia that they would one day become members and said the alliance should promise not to deploy weapons in countries bordering Russia that could threaten its security.

Russia denies planning any attack on Ukraine but accuses Kyiv and Washington of destabilising behaviour, and has said it needs security guarantees for its own protection.

Ukraine has dismissed Moscow's demands for security guarantees as illegitimate and Zelenskiy said Biden had not tried to force concessions on him.

"We didn't talk about any compromises," he said.

(Reporting by Natalia Zinets; writing by Matthias Williams; editing by Barbara Lewis)
Swiss museum to give up more works from Gurlitt LOOTED NAZI art trove

BERLIN (AP) — A Swiss museum to which the late collector Cornelius Gurlitt bequeathed an art trove he amassed at his home said Friday it will relinquish ownership of works where no specific evidence has been found they were looted under Nazi rule, but where research points to “conspicuous circumstances.”

The reclusive Gurlitt, who died in 2014, had squirreled away more than 1,200 works in his Munich apartment and a further 250 or so at a property in Salzburg, Austria. He inherited much of the collection from his father, an art dealer who traded in works confiscated by the Nazis.


Authorities first stumbled on the art while investigating a tax case in 2012.


Gurlitt’s will bequeathed roughly 1,600 works to Switzerland's Kunstmuseum Bern. A German government-backed foundation worked with it to ensure that any pieces looted from Jewish owners were returned to their heirs, and German authorities said in January that 14 works from the Gurlitt collection that were proven to have been looted had been handed over.

The museum said Friday that it “will give up its ownership of any works of unclarified provenance that may lack specific evidence of being Nazi-looted art but for which implications of looted art and/or conspicuous circumstances exist.”

It said that there are 29 works in that category. The museum proposed that two watercolors by German artist Otto Dix be transferred jointly to the descendants of two possible rightful owners. Another five will be handed over to German authorities and the remaining 22 will remain at the museum for further research.

The museum said it is putting the works in the bequest online and that “new research findings will be immediately published in the database and thus ... made internationally accessible." It said it also will publish the research and considerations behind its decision-making.

The Associated Press

Cornelius Gurlitt

Art Collector
Rolf Nikolaus Cornelius Gurlitt was a German art collector. The son of Hildebrand Gurlitt, a Third Reich dealer of Nazi-looted art, Gurlitt was the final guardian of the Gurlitt Collection, a large collection of art acquired in part under dubious circumstances before and during the reign of the Nazis.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Dix

Wilhelm Heinrich Otto Dix was a German painter and printmaker, noted for his ruthless and harshly realistic depictions of German society during the Weimar Republic and the brutality of war. Along with George Grosz and Max Beckmann, he is widely considered one of the most important artists of the Neue Sachlichkeit.























 


















































Colonial looted art: When a museum becomes home

Works by contemporary African artists and colonial looted art are on show side by side in Dortmund, curated by Nana Oforiatta Ayim, an art historian from Ghana.


REINVENTING THE MUSEUM AS A HOME
A different concept of the museum
Efie means home in Twi, one of Ghana's official languages. The exhibition "EFIE: The Museum as Home" questions traditional forms of presentation. In a sense, the museum is to become a home for the works of art, because in African tradition, objects are considered to be animate and alive, which differs from the presentations common in European museums.
1234567



Imagine that artistic objects have a soul, and could feel emotions like suffering, sadness and loneliness — that is what the Ghanaian author and filmmaker Nana Oforiatta Ayim envisioned when she curated the exhibition "EFIE: The Museum as Home," at the Dortmunder U culture center.

Efie, in the Twi language means home, says Nana Oforiatta Ayim. "Historically when we had objects, it wasn't that they were like inanimate things to be put in glass cases — they have a spirit, they were dynamic, they were alive, and the structures they were in were homes for them," she told DW.
A space of healing

In the show, Ayim juxtaposed works by contemporary artists with historical artifacts on loan from German collections. Home, and the loss of home, is the theme that spans past and present.

Ayim created a special space for the historical artworks, what she calls "a kind of space of healing, a home." European museums traditionally present art in a value-neutral way — sculptures stand next to each other in display cases, illuminated by a spotlight. Ayim's exhibition wants to allow a subjective view of the objects to give them back their soul.

Nana Oforiatta Ayim's preoccupation with art from a colonial context is no coincidence, as she serves as Ghana's commissioner for restitution. She is largely responsible for creating strategies for the restitution of looted art from Ghana.

What is most important is to come to terms with history and regain control over one's own narrative, she says, pointing out that the objects were stolen using varying degrees of violence. "There's a separation that's happened between us and our histories and our narratives." Ayim hopes to help ease the pain of separation by inserting this "in-between step before the objects come back [to Ghana]."

Reclaiming one's own history is an issue the eight contemporary artists Ayim has selected for the Dortmund show focus on, too.

Kuukua Eshun "has made a really haunting, beautiful film about women who have gone to various levels of physical abuse and how these women have made their bodies into their homes again," points out Ayim.


Kwasi Darko explores identity and sexuality


The show also presents works by Afroscope, El Anatsui, Diego Arauja, Rita Mawuena Benissan, Kwasi Darko, Na Chainkua Reindorf and Studio Nyali, contemporary artists with different perspectives of the concept "home." Their art is embedded in a mobile bamboo structure within the exhibition, the "fufuzela," that can be expanded when needed and used for a variety of projects.
Mobile museums

DK Osseo Asare, an architect, originally developed the fufuzela for Ayim's mobile museums in Ghana.

With these museums built in the style of typical Ghanaian kiosks, Ayim — who was raised in Germany but now lives in Ghana's capital Accra — wants to bring art closer to her fellow countrymen again: "We do have a national museum in Ghana. It's been closed for a while now, but even when it was open, it was primarily for tourists, maybe school children," Ayim says.

People don't feel connected to the museum, but they will come to cultural festivals by the thousands, she adds, arguing that it's not a lack of interest, but the form of presentation.

Ayim wants to use her exhibitions to question the traditional understanding of museums and to introduce new perspectives. It's a concept that works, whether in Ghana or in Germany.

Reinventing the museum as a home

Nana Oforiatta Ayim, an art historian from Ghana, shows historical and contemporary art from her native country in the "EFIE: The Museum as Home" exhibition in the German city of Dortmund.


Voice of the people: The GOP has become a party with no shame

The Ledger
Thu, December 9, 2021,

A campaign sign in support of President Donald Trump sits on a lawn Thursday, Oct. 22, 2020, in a Hispanic neighborhood of Miami. Florida's Cuban American voters remain a bright spot in Trump's effort to retain his winning coalition from 2016. Polls show his strong support from these key voters may even be growing to include the younger Cuban Americans that Democrats once considered their best hope of breaking the GOP's hold. (AP Photo/Lynne Sladky)

The GOP has become a party with no shame

What has happened to the GOP?


Let’s look at the faces of the Republican Party. The QAnon Squad: Marjory Taylor Green, Georgia; Lauren Boebert, Colorado; and Paul Gosar, Arizona; right-wing nuts all. Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, a man who allowed the ex-president to dishonor his father and wife and still kisses the ring. A man who vacations in Cancun while his constituents literally freeze to death.

A Party that has no policies only culture wars, no solutions only grievances. A Party that supports vigilantes, be it Kyle Rittenhouse or the Texas abortion law. A Party that has lost its conservative way. A Party that stands for fear and hate. A Party slipping into fascism. A Party that is so hypocritical that it claims Christian morals and punishes the poor and downtrodden. A Party the espouses pro-life and discounts the science and actively obstructs simple and proven lifesaving measures to minimize the deaths from COVID-19.

A Party whose titular head is a lying conman, an instigator of an insurrection, a grifter bringing in millions of dollars from his "marks."

A Party with no shame.

A Party with only two honorable members who would dare to stand up to these bigots, liars and cheats.

Bruce W. Paulson, Winter Haven


This article originally appeared on The Ledger: Voice of the people: The GOP has become a party with no shame
Capitol attack panel obtains PowerPoint that set out plan for Trump to stage coup


Hugo Lowell in Washington
Fri, December 10, 2021



Former Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows turned over to the House select committee investigating the 6 January Capitol attack a PowerPoint recommending Donald Trump to declare a national security emergency in order to return himself to the presidency.

Related: Capitol attack committee issues new subpoenas to two ex-Trump aides

The fact that Meadows was in possession of a PowerPoint the day before the Capitol attack that detailed ways to stage a coup suggests he was at least aware of efforts by Trump and his allies to stop Joe Biden’s certification from taking place on 6 January.

The PowerPoint, titled “Election Fraud, Foreign Interference & Options for 6 Jan”, made several recommendations for Trump to pursue in order to retain the presidency for a second term on the basis of lies and debunked conspiracies about widespread election fraud.

Meadows turned over a version of the PowerPoint presentation that he received in an email and spanned 38 pages, according to a source familiar with the matter.

The Guardian reviewed a second, 36-page version of the PowerPoint marked for dissemination with 5 January metadata, which had some differences with what the select committee received. But the title of the PowerPoint and its recommendations remained the same, the source said.

Senators and members of Congress should first be briefed about foreign interference, the PowerPoint said, at which point Trump could declare a national emergency, declare all electronic voting invalid, and ask Congress to agree on a constitutionally acceptable remedy.

The PowerPoint also outlined three options for then vice-president Mike Pence to abuse his largely ceremonial role at the joint session of Congress on 6 January, when Biden was to be certified president, and unilaterally return Trump to the White House.

Pence could pursue one of three options, the PowerPoint said: seat Trump slates of electors over the objections of Democrats in key states, reject the Biden slates of electors, or delay the certification to allow for a “vetting” and counting of only “legal paper ballots”.

The final option for Pence is similar to an option that was simultaneously being advanced on 4 and 5 January by Trump lieutenants – led by lawyers Rudy Giuliani and John Eastman, as well as Trump strategist Steve Bannon – working from the Willard hotel in Washington DC.

The Guardian revealed last week that sometime between the late evening of 5 January and the early hours of 6 January, after Pence declined to go ahead with such plans, Trump then pressed his lieutenants about how to stop Biden’s certification from taking place entirely.

The recommendations in the PowerPoint for both Trump and Pence were based on wild and unsubstantiated claims of election fraud, including that “the Chinese systematically gained control over our election system” in eight key battleground states.

The then acting attorney general, Jeff Rosen, and his predecessor, Bill Barr, who had both been appointed by Trump, by 5 January had already determined that there was no evidence of voter fraud sufficient to change the outcome of the 2020 election.

House investigators said that they became aware of the PowerPoint after it surfaced in more than 6,000 documents Meadows turned over to the select committee. The PowerPoint was to be presented “on the Hill”, a reference to Congress, the panel said.

The powerpoint was presented on 4 January to a number of Republican senators and members of Congress, the source said. Trump’s lawyers working at the Willard hotel were not shown the presentation, according to a source familiar with the matter.

But the select committee said they did find in the materials turned over by Meadows, his text messages with a member of Congress, who told Meadows about a “highly controversial” plan to send slates of electors for Trump to the joint session of Congress.

Meadows replied: “I love it.”

Trump’s former White House chief of staff had turned over the materials to the select committee until the cooperation deal broke down on Tuesday, when Meadows’ attorney, Terwilliger, abruptly told House investigators that Meadows would no longer help the investigation.

The select committee announced on Wednesday that in response, it would refer Meadows for criminal prosecution for defying a subpoena. The chairman of the select committee, Bennie Thompson, said the vote to hold Meadows in contempt of Congress would come next week.

“The select committee will meet next week to advance a report recommending that the House cite Mr Meadows for contempt of Congress and refer him to the Department of Justice for prosecution,” Thompson said in a statement.



Trump’s White House Emailed About a PowerPoint on How to End American Democracy

Ryan Bort
Thu, December 9, 2021

Mark Meadows - Credit: AP

The House Select Committee to Investigate the Jan. 6 Attack on the Capitol has obtained a trove of electronic messages from former Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, including an email referring to a PowerPoint suggesting Trump could declare a national security emergency in order to delay the certification of the results of the 2020 election.

The revelation is the latest indication that Trump and his inner circle, including his allies in Congress, were very actively and very aggressively trying to overturn the results of the election, which Trump lost handily.

The PowerPoint presentation, which spanned 38 pages and was titled “Election fraud, Foreign Interference & Options for 6 JAN,” was part of an email sent on Jan. 5, the day before the attack on the Capitol. The email pertained to a briefing that was to be provided “on the hill.” Hugo Lowell of The Guardian tweeted slides from the presentation on Thursday detailing a conspiracy theory-laden plan for Vice President Pence to install Republican electors in states “where fraud occurred,” and for Trump to declare a national emergency and for all electronic voting to be rendered invalid, citing foreign “control” of electronic voting systems.

In the 13 months since the election, no evidence has emerged that foreign entities influenced the election, or that any significant fraud occurred.

The committee noted in a letter on Wednesday that Meadows had provided text messages in which he discussed a “highly controversial” plan to overturn the election results by appointing alternate electors in certain states. “I love it,” Meadows replied to the idea, which was sent to him by a lawmaker. Meadows discussed the same plan, which was described as a “direct and collateral attack,” in a separate email. The letter referenced the PowerPoint presentation, as well, but did not provide details of its contents.

The letter sent on Wednesday, which was addressed to Meadows’ attorney, explained that the committee had “no choice” but to move to hold Meadows in contempt of Congress for his refusal to comply with his subpoena. How, if Meadows is refusing to comply, did the committee get ahold of all of these damning documents from the former chief of staff? Meadows last week reached an agreement to cooperate, turned over the material, and then earlier this week changed his mind and is now stonewalling the committee. He’s now suing the committee in an attempt to block his subpoena.

It’s unclear what exactly inspired the reversal. Meadows says the committee was not respecting his claims of executive privilege, to which Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) said the committee “tried repeatedly to identify with specificity the areas of inquiry” were subject to privilege, but Meadows wouldn’t cooperate. It’s also possible that Meadows decided to buck the committee after reports began to circulate that Trump was pissed at him for revealing a bunch of damning information about how the White House covered up details of Trump’s bout with Covid last year. It’s also possible that Meadows just isn’t very bright.

Regardless, the committee is now in possession of a trove of his documents indicating the extent of Trumpworld’s very real efforts to overturn the election results, efforts that culminated in a throng of supporters storming the Capitol in a violent attack that resulted in five deaths and dozens of injured police officers.

The material turned over by Meadows may be the tip of the iceberg. Committee Vice Chair Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) said last week that the committee is preparing to hold “several weeks” worth of public hearings that will tell the story of the riot at the Capitol in “vivid color.” She added on Thursday that the committee has met with nearly 300 witnesses, that it is conducting multiple depositions and interviews every week, and that it expects a ruling imminently on whether it can obtain Trump’s White House documents. “The investigation is firing on all cylinders,” she wrote.

Hours after Cheney teased an upcoming ruling on Trump’s executive privilege claim, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals struck it down.


January 6 committee releases documents detailing Trump’s plot to overthrow election by declaring bogus “National Emergency”

Jacob Crosse
WSWS.ORG

Earlier this week, the January 6 House Select Committee charged with investigating former President Donald Trump’s attempted coup released an explosive slide show presentation turned over to the committee by former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows. The slide show revealed Trump’s and his co-conspirators’ systematic plan for overturning democratic forms of rule in the United States.

White House chief of staff Mark Meadows speaks with reporters outside the White House, Oct. 26, 2020, in Washington [Credit: AP Photo/Patrick Semansky, File]

The presentation, dated January 5 and titled “Election Fraud, Foreign Interference & Options for 6 Jan,” begins by citing false claims of “foreign interference” by China through Venezuela and Dominion Voting Systems software.

In response to the alleged “INFLUENCE and CONTROL” of “US Voting Infrastructure in at least 28 States as part of [an] ongoing globalist/socialist operation to subvert the will of United States Voters and install a China ally,” the slides describe in detail the multifaceted plot by Trump and his allies to declare a phony “National Security Emergency” in order to use US Marshals and the National Guard to seize election infrastructure nationwide and “declare electronic voting in all states invalid.”

After declaring the results invalid, the slides call for a “federalized” National Guard, under the command of a so-called “Trusted Lead Counter” appointed “with authority” from Trump to “direct the actions of select federalized National Guard units and support from [Department of Justice], [Department of Homeland Security] and other US government agencies.” These entities would “disqualify all the counterfeit ballots” (emphasis in original) and “then count all the remaining legal paper ballots.”

In a slide titled “Ballot Adjudication,” the document outlines the procedure for suspending the Constitution in order to facilitate the counting of “legal paper ballots.” After the National Guard finishes counting every so-called “legal” ballot in “5-10 days,” the ballots would then be approved by state legislators. Ballot exceptions, the document states, “will require an affirmative vote by the [Supreme Court of the United States] stating that Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 has been suspended. Otherwise all officials will follow the Constitution.”

The shoddy slide show presentation is a window into the thinking of an increasingly fascistic and desperate ruling class that is becoming further untethered from reality by the day. Its existence is further confirmation of the wide-ranging plot orchestrated by Trump, and supported by significant sections of the Republican Party, to overthrow the election of Biden and with it, what little remains of bourgeois democracy in the US. It is further proof that the storming of the Capitol on January 6, which the World Socialist Web Site alone warned the working class in the months following Trump’s electoral defeat, was not a spontaneous riot but the culmination of the dictatorial scheme orchestrated from the highest levels of the US government.

The presentation was part of a tranche of documents turned over by Meadows before he declared earlier this week that he would no longer be complying with the committee’s request. In a letter to Meadows’ lawyer Wednesday citing the presentation, Select Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson (Mississippi-Democrat) wrote that the document was slated for distribution to those “on the hill,” that is, it was to be presented to members of Congress.

In the same letter to Meadows’ lawyer, Thompson noted that in the documents already turned over by Meadows to the committee, the former chief of staff is shown sending emails as early as November 7, 2020 suggesting Republican-controlled states send “alternate” slates of presidential electors to Congress on January 6.

Meadows also turned over to the committee “a November 6, 2020, text exchange with a Member of Congress apparently about appointing alternate electors in certain states as part of a plan that the Member acknowledged would be ‘highly controversial’ and to which Mr. Meadows apparently said, ‘I love it,’” Thompson said.

Thompson noted that in addition to the texts and slide show, Meadows turned over “a January 5, 2021, email about having the National Guard stand by.” This revelation is significant, given the ongoing cover-up within the Pentagon over the purposeful delay of sending National Guard soldiers to the besieged Capitol.

The plan to reject Biden electors and appoint new pro-Trump electors was further described in the presentation as part of three different “options” for Vice President Mike Pence on “6 JAN.”

These options included Pence unilaterally and illegally seating “Republican Electors over the objections of Democrats in states where fraud occurred.” Mimicking the arguments laid out previously in coup lawyers John Eastman’s and Jenna Ellis’s memoranda, the document also suggests that Pence “reject[s] the electors from States where fraud occurred causing the election to be decided by remaining electoral votes.”

The slide directed Pence to delay “the decisions in order to allow for a vetting and subsequent counting of all the legal paper ballots.”

The coup slide show is believed to have been written by retired Army Colonel Phil Waldron of the Allied Security Operations Group, according to professor and national security expert Karen Piper.

Waldron and co-owner of the Allied Security Operations Group, Russell Ramsland Jr., were frequent visitors at Trump’s Willard “war room” command center. The Washington Post previously noted that Waldron, who specialized in “psychological operations” with the Army, led a team of people that reported to Rudy Giuliani’s political crony, Bernard Kerik. This team allegedly provided Kerik with election data analysis supporting Trump’s fraudulent claims.

In a separate article by the Post they write that “to an extent not widely recognized, Ramsland and others associated with ASOG played key roles in spreading the claims of fraud. … They were circulated by Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Tex.), a staunch Trump ally who had been briefed by ASOG. And Ramsland’s assertions were incorporated into the “kraken” lawsuits filed by conservative lawyer Sidney Powell who the Post learned had also been briefed two years earlier by ASOG…”

Confirming the authenticity of the slide show in an interview posted this past June was the recently subpoenaed founder of the fascistic 1st Amendment Praetorian paramilitary group, Robert Patrick Lewis. In an interview with Doug Billing’s “The Right Side,” Lewis, who boasts of providing security to Flynn, describes the “national objectives” and “intelligence” he claimed to be “delivering to the White House, directly to the President.”

“That was stuff based on China’s influence in the United States and specific propaganda that we were outlining…”

A month prior, Lewis gave another interview in which he cited the Maricopa County recount, which was conducted in Arizona earlier this year by Trump partisans as an example of what “we” were “suggesting to Trump” his last week in office.

“It’s interesting how the Maricopa recount ... is extremely similar to what Patrick Byrne, General [Michael] Flynn and Sidney Powell suggested to President Trump there in the last week in the White House,” said Lewis.

“We said, ‘Bring the National Guard in, have a recount’ and livestream across the nation so that everybody can look and see that everything is above board.

“Minus the National Guard,” added Lewis. “Everything they (Byrne, Powell, Flynn) suggested is going on in Maricopa.”

There is no doubt that there remains a mountain of evidence left to uncover that will further implicate Trump, the Republican Party and elements of the police-intelligence-military apparatus in the coup.

Ranking member and one of two Republicans on the committee, Wyoming Representative Liz Cheney, promised earlier this week that the committee will hold a series of hearings “next year” to lay out what has been uncovered, presumably after which the committee will wind down in preparation for the midterms.

Like the “bipartisan” 9/11 Commission that the Select Committee is modeled after, information revealing the widespread support for Trump’s coup within the Republican Party and the capitalist state as a whole will continue to be excluded and omitted. Despite claiming to have interviewed nearly 300 witnesses, the Select Committee has continued to hold hearings and depositions behind closed doors.

The chloroforming of the working class to the true danger of fascism by the Democrats, the pseudo-left and their media supporters continues. This coup memo was known to lawmakers and media sources, prior to Meadows turning it over to the committee.

In fact, the entire document was publicly tweeted out by current far-right Fox News host and former CBS correspondent Lara Logan on the morning of January 5.

The fact that its contents are only now being publicly broadcast by the committee and select news outlets, nearly a year after the coup and 10 months after Trump’s truncated second impeachment trial ended with his acquittal, is a testament to the scale of the ongoing bipartisan cover-up of Trump’s coup.





Isfahan Fatal Crackdown: Water Protests and the Iranian Regime’s new Dilemma

by Pedram Samiêi
December 8, 2021
in Latest Articles


Isfahan farmers' protest on the dried riverbed that runs through the city.

On Friday, the 3rd of December, people of Isfahan called for a mass religious ritual: the Friday Prayers to be joined in on a dried riverbed that runs through the city. The Iranian religious authorities on any other day would welcome any conformist religious convention such as the Friday Prayers. However this time, the city of Isfahan faced a massive raid by security forces to prevent this religious assembly.

Isfahan citizens, symbolically, wanted to conduct their prayers on the dry riverbed of Zayandeh-Rood. This clever decision happened after a brutal, violent, and fatal crackdown of farmers’ peaceful gathering on the same riverbed a few days earlier. The farmers had gathered on the riverbed to express their dissatisfaction about the severe water shortage and water policies of the state.

Iranian authorities insist that the environmental crisis in the country is happening “naturally” because of drought, and they reject claims of mismanagement. However, they do not hesitate to use their violent pattern of behavior to suppress dissatisfaction over this “act of nature.”

The crackdown on the peaceful rally of farmers and residents of Isfahan, the country’s third-largest city, was very violent. The Center for Human Rights in Iran said that based on its investigations, 120 people were arrested in Isfahan. Videos posted on social media show that armed security forces shot and badly injured protesters, targeting protesters’ heads and blinding several protesters. The judicial system of the Islamic Republic confirmed 130 arrests (+).

Iranian suppressive forces are now using their weapons against ordinary residents, workers, and farmers.

Peaceful Protest of Farmers, the Brutal Response of the Regime, and World’s Reticence


News about Iran’s military interventions in the region, the country’s negotiations with world powers to revive the 2015 nuclear deal, and the dissatisfaction of Israel and the US right-wing politicians with these talks, dominate the coverage of the Western media about Iran. The news about the nuclear negotiations is probably not the only and the main concern of every Iranian. Only a few days before the new round of nuclear talks, the violent suppression of farmers’ peaceful protests in Isfahan shocked the country.

In late November, shortly before the onset of the new round of the nuclear talks, Iranian farmers in Isfahan convened in thousands over severe water shortage and water mismanagement. They followed an ‘occupy movement’ pattern as they set up tents and refused to leave the dry riverbed of Zayandeh-Rood. This pattern of protesting with the protesters’ hesitancy to take on a visible anti-regime stance (such as chanting political slogans or carrying political banners) seemingly bewildered the regime. At first, the Isfahan farmers’ protest even got covered by the state-owned television. However, it did not take long until the Isfahan farmers received the same response that the Iranian regime shows to any political protest.

 
The protest of Isfahan farmers over water shortage in November 2021. Climate crisis, water shortage, and severe drought present a novel challenge for the Iranian regime.

After a week of peaceful protest, the farmers’ tents and protest location were raided by the security forces. They started setting up tents on fire, beating up protestors with batons, shooting tear gas and bb guns, and detaining protestors. Videos on social media shows, fatal shooting with shotguns and bb guns that blinded according to one report 40 protestors in at least one eye (+).

This violent response was not unprecedented. Since July, Iranian farmers, as well as the urban and rural citizens have been protesting water shortage and living conditions in Khuzestan and several other provinces. Human rights groups have verified the identities of at least nine protestors that security forces killed during the water protests of summer 2021 in Khuzestan and other provinces who joined the protests.

As evidenced in Isfahan, climate movements and environmental protests are tolerated by the Iranian regime and suppression is the main response; very similar to the crackdown that formerly the regime in Iran has used against political dissidents, students, women and middle-class citizens that raised their voices to protest political issues. Only this time, the weapons of the Islamic Republic are targeting poorer residents in peripheral provinces, rural places, farmers, and workers, and now gatherings to express unrest because of the climate issues that are affecting the lives of every Iranian.

The regime, evidently, has no hesitation to use violence even to disperse a religious gathering, such as the Friday Prayers organized by farmers and workers who are suffering from environmental crises. The Islamic Republic is inevitably setting foot on a self-destructive course. The security forces of the regime, target the very Islamic foundation of this state when they prevent a Friday Prayer. By attacking workers and farmers, they also target the very same people that this state was founded upon their right – the unprivileged and the underserved.

Despotism against itself: IRI’s Self-Destructive Gamble


If the climate and environment crisis in Iran is an “act of nature” or “act of God,” as Iranian religious leaders might like to put it, then why is protesting such condition a felony?

Ahmad Alamolhoda, senior hardliner cleric and widely known as a figure close to IRI’s supreme leader has famously claimed that drought cannot be resolved by protest, but prayers (+). To the eyes of the religious clerics, it might be true that objection to God’s will is not conventional, but the people of Isfahan were conducting a very standard religious rite – they were praying. Friday prayer on the dry riverbed that once supplied the water for the city of Isfahan and all the farms in the province is not against the rule of sharia, nor against the Islamic traditions. Indeed, it is a very acceptable religious response to this catastrophe of not having enough water.

 
The same pattern of behavior formerly has been used to suppress political rallies. But this old model is now the regime’s new weapon to crush environmental protests.

The behavior of the Islamic republic shows either they are skeptical about the very same Islamicness that the state is founded upon or worst, they have become non-believers. Forcefully preventing people from praying to God is an extremely ungodly, if not sinister or heretical deed. Then why does a religious regime commit heresy? Either it has not truly religious, or it is accepting that the environmental crisis is not an act of god and that it is happening at least partially because of man’s water management policies. Most likely, both scenarios are true.

Iran, as a country in the Middle East, has a history of battling water shortage and long-standing drought. On the other hand, other countries in the region, like Israel or the United Arab Emirates, are facing the same environmental conditions and planning strategies for it. Therefore, even the Islamic Republic of Iran, covertly though, acknowledges that the living condition of Isfahan farmers, as well as other people all around the country, is the result of decades of mismanagement.

Consequently, it should not be surprising that the security forces of the regime follow the same pattern to respond to environmental protesters as they typically respond to any political protestation. The environmental issues, in the eyes of Iranian authorities and most likely also, in actuality, are not happening only because of “natural reasons.” They are indeed the result of years of mismanagement, mishandling, corruption, and senselessness policies set forth by high-ranking officials both at the level of provinces and at the capital. Subsequently, any protest to the environmental conditions including the water crisis is also a political.

Both in the water protests of summer 2021, and the Isfahan farmers protests of November 2021, the protesters are not (only) students or middle-class middle-income urban inhabitants who demand freedom and better living conditions. The environmental protesters who are demanding access to water and better living conditions are from poorer populations, farmers, and ordinary urban and rural citizens that battle for their basic natural needs.

The battle between IRI and poorer Iranians started if not shortly after the 1979 revolution, but undeniably after the brutal suppression of recent years’ demonstrations (especially vast nationwide demonstrations in November 2019 known as Aban-98). The new development of Isfahan water protests also shows that the IRI is not only battling poorer Iranians, but also religious Iranians. As a result, the Islamic Republic of Iran is now overtly contradicting itself by prohibiting one of its dominant origins; the Friday Prayer.

All in all, Isfahan’s instance clearly demonstrates the novel transformation of the Islamic Republic regime – the transformation from a religious authoritarian regime, to a full military dictatorship. The Islamic Republic is so close to confessing that is not a successor of another self-centered regime, but a logical continuation of what was going on in Iran before the 1979 revolution: a military dictatorship.
UK
MPs demand Met Police ‘institutional homophobia’ inquiry after Stephen Port probe

Officers had denied accusations of prejudice and homophobia, instead blaming mistakes on being understaffed and lacking resources


By Sophie Wingate, PA
Will Maule 11 DEC 2021
Met police assistant commissioner Helen Ball speaks to the media after the conclusion Barking Town Hall today, after an inquest jury found that police failures in the investigation into the death of Stephen Port's first victim Anthony Walgate "probably" contributed to the death of Gabriel Kovari, the second young gay man to die in almost identical circumstances in Barking, east London

A group of London MPs are calling for a public inquiry into claims of institutional homophobia in the Metropolitan Police after an inquest concluded that failures by officers investigating the victims of serial killer Stephen Port probably cost lives.

Families of the four young gay men killed by sex predator Port have renewed accusations that police prejudice played a part in officers’ failure to listen to their concerns.

Dame Margaret Hodge said she and 17 other signatories had written to Met Commissioner Dame Cressida Dick “to demand a public inquiry considers whether the Met is institutionally homophobic”.

It comes after Dame Margaret, Labour MP for Barking, was told by the Met that an inquiry into the issue was not being proposed, according to the letter.

The letter says: “The police have admitted their mistakes, instituted new protocols, and emphasised that a lack of resources was to blame.

“However, resourcing alone does not explain the sheer number of failures by the police in this matter.

“The key question everyone is asking is yet to be answered – whether institutional homophobia in the Met played a role in these investigations.”

The letter concludes that it is “imperative that a public inquiry takes place urgently to consider if institutional homophobia played a role in this case”.

On Friday, the inquest jury found officers in Barking, east London, missed repeated opportunities to catch Port after he plied first victim Anthony Walgate with a fatal dose of date-rape drug GHB and dumped his body.

Port struck three more times before he was caught, killing each victim in near-identical circumstances, with police failing to link him to the other deaths despite detective work carried out by the victims’ family and friends that would lead to the culprit.

Officers had denied accusations of prejudice and homophobia, instead blaming mistakes on being understaffed and lacking resources, with some acting up in senior positions.

Jurors at the inquests into the deaths of Mr Walgate, 23, Gabriel Kovari, 22, Daniel Whitworth, 21, and Jack Taylor, 25, concluded police failings “probably” contributed to the deaths of the three last victims.

The MPs’ letter lists a “litany of failures” by police, including that the individual deaths were not properly investigated because “a presumption was made that these were young gay men, some of them ‘rent boys’, who were habitual GHB users and accidentally overdosed”.

“Throughout the 12 months the murders took place, family members, partners and friends of the victims were ignored by the police,” MPs wrote.

The letter also notes that of the 17 officers investigated for misconduct, none were dismissed.