Friday, January 27, 2023

SPACE NEWS

Two studies of volatile elements discovered in meteorites constrain the assembly of Earth

Peer-Reviewed Publication

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE (AAAS)

In two separate studies, researchers identify nucleosynthetic isotope anomalies in the volatile elements potassium (K) and zinc (Zn) in meteorites, which constrain the origins of the material that formed Earth. According to both studies, roughly 90% of Earth’s mass was contributed by non-carbonaceous (NC) material from the inner Solar System and about 10% by carbonaceous chondrite (CC) material from the outer Solar System. The CC reservoir provided Earth with about 20% of its K and half of its Zn. Together, the studies indicate that volatile elements were not evenly distributed in the hot solar nebula that formed the Solar System.

Nucleosynthetic anomalies are small differences in the isotope ratios of chemical elements, produced when those elements formed. During the formation of the Solar System, elements carrying these nucleosynthetic anomalies condensed from the gas phase to form solid dust, which was then incorporated into meteorites and the terrestrial planets, including Earth. Different nucleosynthetic anomalies were inherited by material in different parts of the early Solar System. The origin of the material that formed Earth can be constrained by measuring the nucleosynthetic anomalies of meteorites. However, the nucleosynthetic anomalies of volatile elements - those that condense at low temperature - have been difficult to measure, so their origin was poorly constrained.

Nicole Nie, Da Wang, and colleagues measured three K isotopes (39K, 40K and 41K) in 32 meteorites. The researchers found nucleosynthetic anomalies in the isotope 40K, which were larger and more variable in CC meteorites than in NC meteorites. According to the findings, the 40K nucleosynthesis anomaly ratio of Earth rocks closely matches that of NCs, suggesting that most of Earth’s K was delivered by NCs and less than 20% by CCs.

In another study, Rayssa Martins, Sven Kuthning, and colleagues focused on another volatile element, Zn. The authors analyzed the five stable isotopes of Zn in 18 meteorites. They identified nucleosynthetic anomalies in zinc isotopes that differ between the CC and NC meteorites. When compared to the isotopic signature of Earth’s Zn, Martins, Kuthning, et al.’s findings suggest a mixed source of the element. The authors calculate that about 10% of Earth’s total mass was derived from CC meteorites, including 50% of its Zn. The findings indicate that CC material from the outer Solar System could have substantially to contributed Earth’s other volatile elements.

“Our studies complement and confirm each other’s results in multiple ways,” writes Nie in an accompanying questionnaire by both research groups, discussing the findings of both studies and their implications. “Among moderately volatile elements, K is the least volatile while Zn is one of the most volatile elements, our studies thus predict that a wide range of volatile elements should have preserved nucleosynthetic anomalies.”

Railway made Swedish villages and towns greener


Reports and Proceedings

UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG

Lindesberg station 

IMAGE: LINDESBERG STATION IN THE 1940S. THE PICTURE SHOWS WHAT MANY RAILWAY STATIONS LOOKED LIKE BEFORE THE GARDENS WERE REMOVED IN THE 1950S. view more 

CREDIT: SWEDISH RAILWAY MUSEUM

Construction of the main railway lines in Sweden included a large-scale garden project. Parks and kitchen gardens were built around the new stations, and long hedges were planted along the railways. A new dissertation from the University of Gothenburg describes how this came to be and explains why almost all of these cultivated areas are now gone.

Not only did the introduction of railways in Sweden in the 1850s revolutionise travel. It also gave thousands of Swedish villages and towns large gardens, which were often the first public gardens to be established. Railways were novel, and the gardens were an important part of their positive reception.

“These gardens had several purposes. A beautiful park with trees, rosebeds, gravel walkways and benches signalled orderliness and created a comfortable environment where travellers could wait for the train. Hedges and rows of trees were planted to keep animals and people off the tracks, and the railway attendants who lived by the station also had kitchen gardens,” says University of Gothenburg researcher Anna Lindgren, who has written a dissertation entitled The State as Gardener.

Railway construction included gardens

Most of Sweden’s main lines were built in just a few decades in the latter half of the nineteenth century. Decisions for new railways were based on documentation for that included information about the routes, financial accounts and stations. But the parks and gardens are hardly mentioned at all. By going through the archive materials from that time, Anna Lindgren has found that these cultivated areas were likely included from the start.

“My interpretation is that the gardens were as much a matter of course as the rails, which is why they’re not included in the documents. There were similar gardens in countries that had railways early on, like England and Germany,” says Anna Lindgren.

In addition, in the mid-nineteenth century, the concept of the “art of improving nature” gained popularity and was considered a form of cultural expression. The approach at that time viewed the landscape as its own entity with aesthetic value. This also led to an increasing understanding of how gardens benefit local residents and supported nation-building. The railway gardens were high quality. First, local gardeners were hired, then SJ hired its own staff; at its peak, there were over 140 employees. In the 1860s, SJ built plant nurseries at several sites around the country to raise plants.

“The government wanted to bring the art of gardening to the people; there was an explicit ideal of popular education. Several station gardens signposted all of the plants, as is done in botanical gardens, and the plants were available to buy at the local nursery,” says Anna Lindgren.

SJ’s gardeners went around and inspected the gardens at the stations, which were also adapted to the local climate. SJ helped to define Sweden’s plant zones and introduced brand-new plant varieties to the country.

Private vehicles: the beginning of the end

Anna Lindgren discusses two eras that illustrate the rise and fall of railway gardens. During construction of the main lines in 1855–1875, no expense was spared on community building. A century later, from 1955-1975, society had changed – and so had travel habits.

“The societal shift to increased private car ownership from the mid-twentieth century resulted in a decline in train travel and SJ needed to save money. There was a shift from beautification to performance and unprofitable lines were quickly shut down. Streamlining was more important than having a beautiful setting around the stations,” says Anna Lindgren.

In just 20 years, much of the ambition for railway gardens had vanished, and responsibility for the planted areas was “bequeathed” to the local level. In 1973, SJ’s last plant nursery was closed, and responsibility for the planted areas often shifted to the municipalities. But the gardens were in attractive locations in town centres, and the land was often needed for parking for cars and buses. In just a few years, almost all of the gardens disappeared. Today, only a few large railway gardens remain in Sweden.

“During industrial modernisation of the nineteenth century, railways were one of the leading symbols of belief in the future, technological advances and building a modern society. But the shift to post-war ideals saw cars replace railways as the symbol of modern life, and railway stations went from places where people spent time to become places to pass through while travelling,” says Anna Lindgren.

Mercury helps to detail Earth’s most massive extinction event


Peer-Reviewed Publication

UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT


The Latest Permian Mass Extinction (LPME) was the largest extinction in Earth’s history to date, killing between 80-90% of life on the planet, though finding definitive evidence for what caused the dramatic changes in climate has eluded experts.

An international team of scientists, including UConn Department of Earth Sciences researchers Professor and Department Head Tracy Frank and Professor Christopher Fielding, are working to understand the cause and how the events of the LPME unfolded by focusing on mercury from Siberian volcanoes that ended up in sediments in Australia and South Africa. The research has been published in Nature Communications.

Though the LPME happened over 250 million years ago, there are similarities to the major climate changes happening today, explains Frank:

“It’s relevant to understanding what might happen on earth in the future. The main cause of climate change is related to a massive injection of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere around the time of the extinction, which led to rapid warming.”

In the case of the LPME, it is widely accepted that the rapid warming associated with the event is linked to massive volcanism occurring at a huge deposit of lava called the Siberian Traps Large Igneous Province (STLIP), says Frank, but direct evidence was still lacking.

Volcanos leave helpful clues in the geological record. With the outpouring of lava, there was also a huge quantity of gases released, such as CO2 and methane, along with particulates and heavy metals that were launched into the atmosphere and deposited around the globe.

“However, it’s hard to directly link something like that to the extinction event,” says Frank. “As geologists, we’re looking for a signature of some kind — a smoking gun — so that we can absolutely point to the cause.”

In this case, the smoking gun the researchers focused on was mercury, one of the heavy metals associated with volcanic eruptions. The trick is finding areas where that record still exists.

Frank explains there is a continuous record of the earth’s history contained in sediments in marine environments which acts almost like a tape recorder because deposits are quickly buried and protected. These sediments yield an abundance of data about the extinction and how it unfolded in the oceans. On land, it is more difficult to find such well-preserved records from this time period.

To illustrate this, Frank uses Connecticut as an example: the state is rich with 400-500-million-year-old metamorphic rocks at or near the surface, with a covering of glacial deposits dating to around 23,000 years ago.

“There’s a big gap in the record here. You have to be lucky to preserve terrestrial records and that’s why they aren’t as well studied, because there are fewer of them out there,” says Frank.

Not all terrains around the world have such massive gaps in the geologic record, and previous studies of the LPME have focused primarily on sites found in the northern hemisphere. However, the Sydney Basin in Eastern Australia and the Karoo Basin in South Africa are two areas in the southern hemisphere that happen to have an excellent record of the event, and are areas Frank and Fielding have studied previously. A colleague and co-author, Jun Shen from the State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources at the China University of Geosciences, reached out and connected with Frank, Fielding, and other co-authors for samples, with hopes to analyze them for mercury isotopes.

Shen was able to analyze the mercury isotopes in the samples and tie all the data together says Frank.

“It turns out that volcanic emissions of mercury have a very specific isotopic composition of the mercury that accumulated at the extinction horizon. Knowing the age of these deposits, we can more definitively tie the timing of the extinction to this massive eruption in Siberia. What is different about this paper is we looked not only at mercury, but the isotopic composition of the mercury from samples in the high southern latitudes, both for the first time.”

This definitive timing is something that scientists have been working on refining, but as Fielding points out, the more that we learn, the more complicated it gets.

“As a starting point, geologists have pinpointed the timing of the major extinction event at 251.9 million years with a high degree of precision from radiogenic isotope dating methods. Researchers know that is when the major extinction event happened in the marine environment and it was just assumed that the terrestrial extinction event happened at the same time.”

In Frank and Fielding’s previous research, they found that the extinction event on land happened 200-600,000 years earlier, however.

“That suggests that the event itself wasn’t just one big whammy that happened instantaneously. It wasn’t just one very bad day on Earth, so to speak, it took some time to build and this feeds in well into the new results because it suggests the volcanism was the root cause,” says Fielding. “That’s just the first impact of the biotic crisis that happened on land, and it happened early. It took time to be transmitted into the oceans. The event 251.9 million years ago was the major tipping point in environmental conditions in the ocean that had deteriorated over some time.”

Retracing the events relies on knowledge from many different geologists all specializing in different methods, from sedimentology, geochemistry, paleontology, and geochronology, says Frank,

“This type of work requires a lot of collaboration. It all started with fieldwork when a group of us went down to Australia, where we studied the stratigraphic sections that preserved the time interval in question. The main point is that we now have a chemical signature in the form of mercury isotope signatures, that definitively ties the extinction horizon in these terrestrial sections that provide a record of what was happening on land due to Siberian Traps volcanism.”

ESG

Study finds that board renewal can benefit the environment

Hannes Wagner, Bocconi University Milan, finds that governance mechanisms that help align the interests of investors and board members enhance the environmental performance of firms. This is true also if a woman is appointed to a previously all-male board

Peer-Reviewed Publication

BOCCONI UNIVERSITY

Female Directors Improve the Environment 

VIDEO: HANNES WAGNER, BOCCONI UNIVERSITY, MILAN, FINDS THAT GOVERNANCE MECHANISMS THAT HELP ALIGN THE INTERESTS OF INVESTORS AND BOARD MEMBERS ENHANCE THE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE OF FIRMS. THIS IS TRUE ALSO IF A WOMAN IS APPOINTED TO A PREVIOUSLY ALL MALE BOARD. WAGNER’S INVESTIGATION IS JOINT WITH HIS COAUTHORS ALEXANDER DYCK (UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO), KARL V. LINS (UNIVERSITY OF UTAH), LUKAS ROTH (UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA), AND MITCH TOWNER (UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA). THE AUTHORS IDENTIFIED TWO POTENTIAL BOARD RENEWAL MECHANISMS: THE ADOPTION OF MAJORITY VOTING AND THE INTRODUCTION OF A FEMALE DIRECTOR. MAJORITY VOTING FOR BOARD MEMBERS IS DIFFERENT FROM PLURALITY VOTING. IT GIVES INVESTORS MORE POWER. “AND WHAT WE SHOW IS THAT MAJORITY VOTING RULES LEAD TO BETTER ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE,” PROFESSOR WAGNER SAYS. SO, GIVING INVESTORS MORE POWER, AND IMPROVING CORPORATE GOVERNANCE LEADS TO ANOTHER OUTCOME, WHICH IS IMPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE OF A FIRM. THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR A LOT OF INVESTORS, SINCE WHILE THEY CARE ABOUT FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE, MANY OF THEM INCREASINGLY CARE ABOUT THESE OTHER NON-FINANCIAL ASPECTS OF THE PERFORMANCE OF A FIRM. THE APPOINTMENT OF A FEMALE DIRECTOR TO AN ALL-MALE BOARD HAS AN EVEN STRONGER EFFECT. “WE ANALYZE IN DETAIL HOW FEMALE BOARD MEMBERS DIFFER IN THEIR CHARACTERISTICS FROM MALE BOARD MEMBERS, SINCE WE KNOW FOR EXAMPLE THAT FEMALE DIRECTORS TEND TO HAVE HIGHER EDUCATION LEVELS,” WAGNER EXPLAINS. “WHAT IS INTERESTING IS THAT ONCE WE CONTROL FOR ANY DIFFERENCES SUCH AS EDUCATION AND PRIOR EXECUTIVE EXPERIENCE, THE FEMALE EFFECT CONTINUES TO SHOW UP. SO, APPOINTING FEMALE DIRECTORS TO ALL-MALE BOARDS IMPROVES ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE AND THIS IS DIRECTLY RELATED TO GENDER.” view more 

CREDIT: BOCCONI UNIVERSITY, MILAN

In an age when environmental awareness is widespread among investors, board renewal mechanisms that better align investors’ and directors’ interests can enhance a firm’s environmental performance, according to a new study by Hannes Wagner (Bocconi University, Milan). Interestingly, the study also finds a positive relation between the appointment of female directors and environmental performance.

Wagner’s investigation is joint with his coauthors Alexander Dyck (University of Toronto), Karl V. Lins (University of Utah), Lukas Roth (University of Alberta), and Mitch Towner (University of Arizona). It is titled “Renewable Governance: Good for the Environment?”, and it is forthcoming in the Journal of Accounting Research.

The authors identified two potential board renewal mechanisms: the adoption of majority voting and the introduction of a female director. Under majority voting, directors must obtain more than half of the votes cast by shareholders to be elected. Without it, directors only need a plurality of the votes cast. Thus, majority voting gives investors the ability to vote against directors, rather than just withhold their votes.

The paper finds that the introduction of majority voting is correlated to a significant increase in a firm’s environmental performance. In recent years investors have been pushing for firms to focus on environmental, rather than just financial, performance. Majority voting ensures a greater alignment between the interests of investors and directors.

The findings are even stronger when considering the relation between environmental performance and the appointment of a female director in the board. Most interestingly, the coefficients are still significant when controlling for board member characteristics such as education and experience. This suggests that the improvement in environmental performance is a direct effect of gender itself rather than of characteristics of female directors.

“The key contribution of our work is providing a roadmap for investors,” Professor Wagner said. “We show that if they want to increase environmental performance, they should not only monitor sustainability metrics, but also take action ‘upstream’, at the board level, where changes that produce such improvements are decided.”

The authors exploit quasi-exogenous shocks in different countries as a testing field for their hypotheses. These shocks are useful as they cause a change in one of the two variables investigated in the paper (female presence in the board or majority voting) without specifically intending to address firms’ environmental performance.

To evaluate the effect of appointing a female director, the authors analyzed countries that introduced compulsory gender quotas for boards. The results show that firms that introduced a female board member for the first time environmentally outperformed firms that did not by 8%, on average.

“Currently, regulatory efforts are aimed at increasing gender equality in boards. As an interesting and welcome side effect, these measures appear to also improve environmental performance of firms,” Prof. Wagner commented.

As for majority voting, the authors exploited the pressure from a campaign conducted by a large investor group in Canada. In this case, too, firms that switched to majority voting after the campaign exhibited a significant improvement in environmental performance measures.

Finally, the link between board renewal mechanism and environmental performance was stronger in countries with better investor protection laws and stricter disclosure requirements. But that is not all. The same (stronger link) was true also for firms having a more “motivated” shareholder base. This result reinforces the hypothesis that investors use board renewal to align the boards’ interests with their own.

“As ever more shareholders look for sustainability when making investment choices,” Prof. Wagner concluded, “investigating the drivers of environmental performance at the board level is something that can produce meaningful and tangible results. As so often, academic research can help better decision making”.

Alexander Dyck, Karl V. Lins, Lukas Roth, Mitch Towner, Hannes Wagner, “Renewable Governance: Good for the Environment?”, forthcoming in Journal of Accounting Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12462.

Aston University receives Wolfson Foundation grant to help develop first integrated lab-scale center to explore low carbon hydrogen production from biomass conversion

Grant and Award Announcement

ASTON UNIVERSITY

EBRI 

IMAGE: EBRI view more 

CREDIT: ASTON UNIVERSITY

Aston University receives Wolfson Foundation grant to help develop first integrated lab-scale centre to explore low carbon hydrogen production from biomass conversion

  •  Grant to help set up first integrated centre to explore low carbon hydrogen production from biomass conversion
  • Centre to be equipped with state-of-the-art technology
  • Will place Aston University at the forefront of hydrogen production and utilisation


 25 January 2023 | Birmingham, UK

Aston University is to set up the first integrated centre to explore low carbon hydrogen production from biomass conversion.

The new research centre will be developed at Aston University with the help of a £300,000 grant from the Wolfson Foundation, which will enable the University to acquire state-of-the-art equipment including for gasification, membrane separation and fuel cells. Having these technologies integrated within the new centre will place Aston University at the forefront of hydrogen production and utilisation based on biomass conversion and will strengthen its global research reputation in these areas.

The new equipment will be installed at the University’s campus-based Energy and Bioproducts Research Institute (EBRI), which carries out world-leading research into new and innovative ways of converting biomass into sources of sustainable energy, using thermochemical, biological and catalytic processes.

It is expected that this research centre will allow national and international collaborations on low carbon hydrogen production and use. The research topics will be closely aligned to both the UK Government’s target to transition to net zero by 2050 and to future sustainable energy worldwide.

Professor Patricia Thornley, director of EBRI, said: “We are delighted to receive this generous grant which will help place EBRI at the forefront of hydrogen technology development in the UK.

“Researchers have a crucial role to play in supporting new energy technologies and this new facility will contribute to the Government’s 2050 net zero target.

“As well as all the new opportunities this holistic and novel approach will bring, it will involve diverse stakeholders including policy makers, academics, industrialists, etc.

“I am looking forward to using the new facilities to support industrialists and developers progressing technology scale-up in this important area.”

Paul Ramsbottom, chief executive of the Wolfson Foundation, said: “Aston University’s Energy and Bioproducts Research Institute is well-placed to support the UK’s continuing journey towards achieving net zero. We are delighted to be supporting new facilities which will help them deepen their collaboration with industry in efforts to generate, store and utilise sustainable hydrogen as a viable alternative to fossil fuels. It is a crucial area of research.”

Aston University’s Vice-Chancellor, Professor Aleks Subic, said“This new centre will help strengthen Aston University’s place as a national and global centre of expertise for future energy.

“It will build on existing relationships with our industrial partners, facilitate future research collaborations, as well as support teaching of our students to make them better equipped to tackle one of the grand challenges of the 21st century. We are extremely grateful to the Wolfson Foundation for their continued support and for helping to make this centre possible.”

The Wolfson Foundation awards grants for new buildings, refurbishment and equipment to support excellence in the fields of science and medicine, health, education and the arts and humanities. Aston University and EBRI researchers will enormously benefit from this grant which will open various opportunities for national and international collaborations with different stakeholders.

In May, June and September the EBRI plant will be opening its doors to professionals who want to enhance their careers with a short hands-on course in Practical Process EngineeringFor more information visit https://www.aston.ac.uk/study/courses/practical-process-engineering

ENDS


 
  
Notes to Editors

The Wolfson Foundation is an independent charity with a focus on research and education. Its aim is to support civil society by investing in excellent projects in science, health, heritage, humanities and the arts.

 

Since it was established in 1955, some £1 billion (£2 billion in real terms) has been awarded to more than 12,000 projects throughout the UK, all on the basis of expert review.

Twitter: @wolfsonfdn

 

The academics leading this centre will be Dr Paula Blanco (leading research in biomass gasification), Dr Zhentao Wu (leading research in membranes), Dr Amir Amiri (leading research in fuel cells), and Dr Clara Serrano (technical support).

 

About Aston University

Founded in 1895 and a university since 1966, Aston is a long-established university led by its three main beneficiary groups – students, business and the professions, and the West Midlands region and wider society. Located in Birmingham at the heart of a vibrant city, the campus houses all the University’s academic, social and accommodation facilities for our students. Professor Aleks Subic is the Vice-Chancellor & Chief Executive.

In 2022 Aston University was ranked in the top 25 of the Guardian University Guide, based on measures including entry standards, student satisfaction, research quality and graduate prospects. The Aston Business School MBA programme was ranked in the top 100 in the world in the Economist MBA 2021 ranking.

For media inquiries in relation to this release, contact Nicola Jones, Press and Communications Manager, on (+44) 7825 342091 or email: n.jones6@aston.ac.uk

 

Be first to get the latest news, research and expert comment from Aston University by following us on Twitter

Need an expert for your story? Browse our expert directory