Wednesday, January 22, 2025

 

Curious blue rings in trees and shrubs reveal cold summers of the past — potentially caused by volcanic eruptions



Blue growth rings found in woody plant stems represent years when cells did not lignify properly because of summers too cold for growth



Frontiers

A blue ring dating to 1902 

image: 

A blue ring formed in 1902 in a tree in northern Norway. Image by Pawel Matulewski and Liliana Siekacz.

view more 

Credit: Image by Pawel Matulewski and Liliana Siekacz.




When the going gets cold, even tough trees struggle with growing. Trees need a certain number of warm days in their growing seasons to grow properly; otherwise, the cell walls of new growth don’t lignify properly, creating ‘blue rings’ that appear when wood samples are dyed. Since trees and shrubs can live for hundreds of years, identifying these blue rings allows us to spot cold summers in the past. By looking at pine trees and juniper shrubs from northern Norway, scientists identified two extremely cold summers in 1902 and 1877, possibly caused by the eruptions of Mount Pelée on the island of Martinique and Cotopaxi in Ecuador.  

“Blue rings look like unfinished growth rings, and are associated with cold conditions during the growing season,” said Dr Agata Buchwal of Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland, lead author of the article in Frontiers in Plant Science. “In general, we found more blue rings in trees than in shrubs. Shrubs seem to be more adapted to cooling events than trees, which is probably why shrubs are found further north. That is why I love to study shrubs; they seem to be the true heroes of the north.” 

Growing pains 

The scientists sampled cores from 25 Scots pine trees and stem-base discs from 54 common juniper shrubs at a site high on the treeline of Mount Iškoras in northern Norway. The team cross-sectioned and stained these samples, then photographed them under a microscope so that growth ring widths could be measured and cross-dated, and blue rings identified.  

“Blue ring studies require a much longer protocol than classical dendrochronological studies,” Buchwal noted. “We are grateful to work with dedicated, highly-qualified lab technicians. Only together we can explore the blue ring world in high resolution using microscope slides!” 

Overall, only 2.1% of the pine trees’ rings and 1.3% of the juniper shrubs’ rings were blue; the cells which hadn’t lignified properly were mainly found at the end of growth rings, in latewood. Blue rings occurred most frequently in 1902 — 96% of pine trees and 68% of juniper shrubs — followed by 1877 — 84% of pine trees and 36% of juniper shrubs. Pine trees seemed to be more vulnerable to blue ring formation than juniper shrubs, which could make them a more sensitive indicator of cold summers. 

“In the case of pine trees in boreal regions, blue rings have the potential to weaken the tree, making it more susceptible to mechanical damage or disease,” explained Dr Pawel Matulewski of Adam Mickiewicz University, second author of the article. “If this phenomenon persists over several years, it can impede the tree's recovery in following years.” 

Comparing this data with local weather records showed that 1902 and 1877 were characterized by very low summer temperatures. In 1902 the coldest June ever recorded delayed the growing season, so a low total number of days in that year were warm enough for tree growth. This could explain why earlywood formed almost normally in 1902, but latewood didn’t, creating many blue latewood cells: the growing season was too short, so the latewood didn’t have time to develop properly.  

Comparing the cooling events — the 1902 event fell in June, when the growth season usually begins, and the 1877 event in August — suggests it may even be possible to differentiate between cooling at different times. Late cooling events may lead to more lignified cell walls and a ‘less blue’ ring. 

Volcanoes’ long shadow 

Other studies have linked blue rings to global climatic events, such as cooling after large volcanic eruptions. 1902’s cold June could be related to the eruption of Mount Pelée in May. Similarly, the late June eruption of Cotopaxi aligns with 1877’s cold August — but there is no other reported evidence for related cooling in northern Norway after this eruption. This blue ring could also be due to another, as-yet unidentified, factor.  

Looking at other blue rings, the scientists identified more potential cold summer periods — but the weather seems to have been less cold, and some temperature data were missing, preventing analysis. The scientists also cautioned that temperatures among the trees might have been different to those recorded at the Mount Iškoras weather station: future research will need in-situ weather data.  

“We hope to inspire other research groups to look for the blue rings in their material,” said Buchwal. “It would be great to establish a blue ring network based on trees and shrubs to reconstruct cooling events at the northern treeline over long timescales.” 

SPAGYRIC HERBALISM

New frontiers in organic chemistry: Synthesis of a promising mushroom-derived compound


Researchers report the first-ever total synthesis of inaoside A, a chemical isolated from fungus with medical and dietary potential




Shinshu University

First-ever synthesis of inaoside A from easily obtainable precursors 

image: 

Researchers from Japan have now proposed a novel strategy for synthesizing inaoside A from two major compounds: a ribofuranosyl trichloroacetimidate (left) and an aglycone (right). 

view more 

Credit: Dr. Atsushi Kawamura from Shinshu University, Japan




Natural compounds from plants and animals have long been used in drug development, but mushrooms remain underexplored despite their rich chemical potential. Now, researchers from Japan have successfully developed the first method to synthesize inaoside A, a compound derived from the edible mushroom Laetiporus cremeiporus. This achievement will help better understand more of its bioactive properties and pave the way for similar mushroom-derived compounds in pharmaceuticals and functional foods.

Natural compounds derived from plants and animals have long been a source of inspiration when developing drugs and dietary supplements. Many well-established medical substances were derived from compounds isolated from plants, with morphine, aspirin, and paclitaxel being prime examples. Unfortunately, despite their long history of human consumption for their beneficial properties, mushrooms, and their varied chemical repertoire have received much less attention from biochemists.

Against this backdrop, a research team led by Assistant Professor Atsushi Kawamura from the Department of Biomolecular Innovation, Shinshu University, Japan, along with Mr. Tomoya Takao from the Department of Agriculture, Shinshu University, and Dr. Hidefumi Makabe from the Department of Biomolecular Innovation, Shinshu University, set their sights on inaoside A, an α-D-ribofuranoside-type compound they had previously isolated from the edible mushroom Laetiporus cremeiporus. Their study was made available online on October 31, 2024, and was published in Volume 13 Issue 12 of the Asian Journal of Organic Chemistry on December 13, 2024.

The motivation behind this study was twofold. “Although the α-D-ribofuranoside structure is frequently found in natural products, there have been fewer reports of the synthesis of α-D-ribofuranosides than of the β-anomers. Thus, the synthesis of α-D-ribofuranosides has attracted much attention from organic chemists,” says Dr. Kawamura. He further adds, “Moreover, the total synthesis of inaoside A is an important objective because its varied bioactivities need to be investigated.

To achieve their goal, the research team used an α-selective Schmidt glycosylation as a key reaction. This reaction involves the attachment of a glycoside to another molecule in a specific position and orientation, known as an “α” position. The two molecules that would have to partake in Schmidt glycosylation were determined through retrosynthetic chemistry—an approach where chemists work backward from the desired final product to figure out the necessary starting materials and reactions.

This strategy led the team to two key compounds: an aglycone they could obtain from vanillin and a ribofuranosyl trichloroacetimidate. However, there was a problem: most reported syntheses of ribofuranosides following the general Schmidt glycosylation procedure tend to produce β-ribofuranosides rather than their α versions preferentially.

To overcome this hurdle, the researchers employed a different substrate for the reaction, namely a 2,3,5-tri-O-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-protected ribofuranoside substrate. Using this compound, which was easy to prepare and deprotect after the glycosylation reaction, the team successfully produced α-ribofuranoside with remarkable selectivity, attaining an α/β ratio ranging from 4:1 to 5:1.

Being able to synthesize recently discovered naturally occurring compounds is essential to uncover their properties and functionalities. “By elucidating the chemical structures and biological activities of natural products derived from mushrooms, we aim to discover the potential of edible mushrooms as functional foods. These natural products could contribute to advancing pharmaceutical science by serving as pharmaceutical leads,” highlights Dr. Kawamura. 

Now that it can be readily synthesized, the research team has high hopes for inaoside A. “Further studies on inaoside A, including more detailed investigation of its bioactivities, the synthesis of derivatives, and structure–activity relationship studies, are in progress. We would like to develop this chemical into a socially meaningful compound,” concludes Dr. Kawamura.

Overall, this synthetic chemistry breakthrough not only paves the way for further research into inaoside A’s qualities but also underlines the untapped potential of mushroom-derived compounds. As scientists continue to unlock the secrets of these natural products, the doors will open to novel therapeutic and dietary applications that could benefit human health.

 

###

 

About Shinshu University

Shinshu University is a national university founded in 1949 and located nestling under the Japanese Alps in Nagano known for its stunning natural landscapes. Our motto, "Powered by Nature - strengthening our network with society and applying nature to create innovative solutions for a better tomorrow" reflects the mission of fostering promising creative professionals and deepening the collaborative relationship with local communities, which leads to our contribution to regional development by innovation in various fields. We’re working on providing solutions for building a sustainable society through interdisciplinary research fields: material science (carbon, fiber and composites), biomedical science (for intractable diseases and preventive medicine) and mountain science, and aiming to boost research and innovation capability through collaborative projects with distinguished researchers from the world. For more information visit https://www.shinshu-u.ac.jp/english/ or follow us on X (Twitter) @ShinshuUni for our latest news.

 

Dining out with San Francisco’s coyotes



How a city reshapes what a native predator eats



Peer-Reviewed Publication

University of California - Davis

Coyote overlooks San Francisco 

image: 

A coyote in San Francisco takes in a view of the city.

view more 

Credit: Tali Caspi, UC Davis




As their traditional dining options dwindle and natural areas give way to restaurants, homes and sidewalks, the coyotes of San Francisco are shifting what they eat.

Scientists from the University of California, Davis, wanted to understand what San Francisco’s coyotes are eating, and how their diet is changed and shaped by the city’s landscape, which can vary from block to block.

Their study, published in the journal Ecosphere, found that the number of restaurants and amount of pavement or “impervious surfaces” within the city heavily influenced what the coyotes ate. Coyote consumption of rats was highest where restaurant density was highest, and consumption of human-sourced food was highest in the most heavily paved parts of the city.

The findings can help inform and prioritize management strategies to protect native coyotes and reduce human-wildlife conflicts.

What San Francisco’s coyotes are eating

So what are coyotes eating in San Francisco? 

A lot of human-provided food,” said lead author Tali Caspi, a Ph.D. candidate with the UC Davis Department of Environmental Science and Policy and with the UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine’s Mammalian Ecology and Conservation Unit (MECU). “Chicken is a really big diet item; we found it in 72% of the scat samples analyzed in the study.”

However, a natural prey source, pocket gophers, comprised the next most popular food source, found in about 57% of the scats collected, followed by pig (human-sourced) and racoon (natural). While some people have expressed concern about coyotes eating cats, felines were rare in the dietary analysis, detected in 4.5% of samples. 

Scat and DNA analysis

To reach their findings, the authors collected more than 700 coyote scat samples from throughout San Francisco between September 2019 and April 2022. They brought them to UC Davis for lab analyses at MECU, within the Veterinary Genetics Laboratory. Genotyping matched fecal samples to individual coyotes, while DNA metabarcoding quantified diet composition.

Caspi notes that while the analysis reveals food sources, it does not differentiate among, for example, a backyard chicken, takeout from a dumpster, or chicken found in pet food. 

The research also showed that coyotes in more urbanized parts of the city, such as Telegraph Hill near Coit Tower or Bernal Hill, ate more human-sourced food than coyote neighbors with more green space, such as in the Presidio or Golden Gate Park.

The scientists also observed that diets among coyote family groups were highly varied, while diets among members of the same family varied little. 

 “This study highlights the huge range of dietary and habitat affinities of coyotes as a species,” said senior author Ben Sacks, director of the MECU at UC Davis. “ That is a trait for which they are already well-known, but the study also joins a growing body of evidence pointing to relatively narrow proclivities of coyotes as individuals. They tend to stick with what they know.” 

Living among coyotes

Coyotes are native to San Francisco. Extirpated in the early 1900s, they returned in the early 2000s and now share space with more than 870,000 people on 47 square miles — the second-most densely populated major city in the United States — with water on three sides. 

There are many things people can do to respectfully share space with coyotes and reduce human-wildlife conflict. This includes keeping cats indoors, not leaving pet food outside, securely disposing food waste and, perhaps most importantly: “Don’t feed coyotes,” Caspi said. “There’s a misconception that coyotes are starving and need our help finding food in San Francisco, and clearly they don’t.”

Coping with urban life

From song sparrows in Portland, Oregon varying their song frequencies to cockatoos in Australia opening trash cans, the study joins the body of literature showing behavioral differences within cities among the same species.

“There are a lot of different ways to survive city life as an animal,” Caspi said. “It speaks to the plasticity and resilience of these species to see all of these different strategies for coping with urban life.”

Additional coauthors include Monica Serrano and Stevi Vanderzwan of UC Davis, independent researcher Janet Kessler, and Christopher Schell of UC Berkeley.

The study was funded by a Christine Stevens Wildlife Award from the Animal Welfare Institute, the UC Davis Center for Community and Citizen Science, and additional supporting grants from UC Davis and UC Berkeley. Caspi also acknowledged the contributions of community scientists via iNaturalist. The online network helped lead her to fresh scat samples and even helped her trace a rare lab analysis of fin whale in a coyote’s diet to a nearby beached fin whale recorded on the app.

How employee trust in AI

drives performance and adoption




Wiley



Many companies are making substantial investments in artificial intelligence (AI), which can enhance decision-making processes, foster innovation, increase productivity, and have other advantages. New research published in the Journal of Management Studies shows that company employees’ perceptions of how well AI performs (cognitive trust) and feelings towards AI (emotional trust) vary, and that these perceptions can affect AI performance and adoption in organizations.

Interviews with employees of a medium-sized software development firm revealed four different trust configurations: full trust (high cognitive/high emotional), full distrust (low cognitive/low emotional), uncomfortable trust (high cognitive/low emotional), and blind trust (low cognitive/high emotional).

Employees exhibited distinct behaviors under these different trust configurations: some responded by detailing their digital footprints, while others engaged in manipulating, confining, or withdrawing them. These behaviors triggered a “vicious cycle,” where biased and unbalanced data inputs degraded AI performance, further eroding trust and stalling adoption.

The findings could provide insights into how managers should introduce AI into the workplace.

“AI adoption isn’t just a technological challenge—it’s a leadership one. Success hinges on understanding trust, addressing emotions, and meeting employees where they are,” said corresponding author Natalia Vuori, DSc, of Aalto University, in Finland. “Without this human-centered approach, even the smartest AI will fail to deliver on its promise.”

URL upon publication: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/JOMS.13177

 

Additional Information

NOTE: The information contained in this release is protected by copyright. Please include journal attribution in all coverage. For more information or to obtain a PDF of any study, please contact: Sara Henning-Stout, newsroom@wiley.com.

About the Journal
The Journal of Management Studies is a globally respected, multidisciplinary business and management journal with a long-established history of excellence in management research. We publish innovative empirical and conceptual articles which advance the fields of management and organization, welcoming contributions relevant to organization theory, organizational behaviour, human resource management, strategy, international business, entrepreneurship, innovation and critical management studies. We have an inclusive ethos and open to a wide range of methodological approaches and philosophical underpinnings.

About Wiley     
Wiley is one of the world’s largest publishers and a trusted leader in research and learning. Our industry-leading content, services, platforms, and knowledge networks are tailored to meet the evolving needs of our customers and partners, including researchers, students, instructors, professionals, institutions, and corporations. We empower knowledge-seekers to transform today’s biggest obstacles into tomorrow’s brightest opportunities. For more than two centuries, Wiley has been delivering on its timeless mission to unlock human potential. Visit us at Wiley.com. Follow us on FacebookXLinkedIn and Instagram.

 

Do minimum wage hikes negatively impact students’ summer employment?



Wiley




New research in Contemporary Economic Policy indicates that rising minimum wages in a state are associated with reduced summer employment for college students, the time when students tend to work the most.

The study, which involved data from a public university and quarterly work records from Washington State, found that college students’ employment and hours worked decrease as minimum wages rise in the summer quarter. Students experiencing the largest reductions are those with little or no work experience and non-local students.

Several explanations may account for the study’s findings and should be examined in future research.

“This study offers some of the first empirical evidence on the employment of inexperienced workers, particularly those entering the labor market for the first time, when minimum wages rise,” said corresponding author Adam Wright, PhD, of Western Washington University.

URL upon publication: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coep.12687

 

Additional Information
NOTE:
 The information contained in this release is protected by copyright. Please include journal attribution in all coverage. For more information or to obtain a PDF of any study, please contact: Sara Henning-Stout, newsroom@wiley.com.

About the Journal
First published in 1982, Contemporary Economic Policy publishes scholarly research and analysis on important policy issues facing society. The journal provides insight into the complexity of policy decisions and communicates evidence-based solutions in a form accessible to economists and policy makers. Contemporary Economic Policy provides a forum for debate by enhancing our understanding of key issues and methods used for policy analysis.

About Wiley     
Wiley is one of the world’s largest publishers and a trusted leader in research and learning. Our industry-leading content, services, platforms, and knowledge networks are tailored to meet the evolving needs of our customers and partners, including researchers, students, instructors, professionals, institutions, and corporations. We empower knowledge-seekers to transform today’s biggest obstacles into tomorrow’s brightest opportunities. For more than two centuries, Wiley has been delivering on its timeless mission to unlock human potential. Visit us at Wiley.com. Follow us on FacebookXLinkedIn and Instagram.

Disclaimer: AAAS a

Opinion - Ronald Reagan paved the way for Trump 2.0

Gilad Tanay, opinion contributor

Sun, January 19, 2025


Immediately after the January 6, 2021 riot by Donald Trump’s supporters at the Capitol, the idea that Trump might be inaugurated as president for a second term was practically unthinkable. But the conditions that enabled his return to power have been decades in the making, beginning with policies first introduced by President Ronald Reagan.

After the tear gas dispersed and the Capitol was cleared up in January 2021, the FBI launched the largest federal investigation in U.S. history to arrest those accountable. Trump, who had urged protesters to “fight like hell,” would later face a federal indictment for his role in the chaos. Surely, this would make any new presidential campaign seem laughable.

So, how on earth did Trump win?

Commentators were quick to blame the Democrats’ time in office. Did President Joe Biden turn his back on the working class? Yes, he did, but that doesn’t explain why almost all voting groups shifted toward Trump, who in his first term became the first president since the Great Depression to leave office with fewer jobs in the country than when he entered.

Some argue that Biden dropped out of the race too late. But he was trailing in the polls even before his disastrous debate appearance. Others say that Kamala Harris’s campaign was too “woke,” or that her failure to identify what she would’ve done differently than Biden was fatally damaging. Still others would point to record inflation and other economic pressures.

Although these theories stack up, none of them answer the real question here: How could a country with democratic values so deeply ingrained in its national ethos elect a president who openly defies them?

The truth is that democratic capitalism has been steadily building toward a foreseeable crisis for the last 45 years, comprising three mutually reinforcing trends that began during the Reagan era: Stagnating growth, rising inequality and growing polarization.

Sure, the Trump vs. Reagan comparison is overdone. But what’s overlooked is how Reagan’s policies created the conditions for a populist power grab. Reagan came to power at a time when the growth rate was the highest since the industrial revolution. Inequality was trending downward, and almost everyone was sharing the fruits of progress.

But the Reagan administration turned its back on the welfare model established by his predecessors, in favor of the political-economic theory and ideology of neo-liberalism. The neo-liberals rejected the idea that tax-funded government programs are the best way to improve lives. Rather, they believed that when the market prospers, everyone prospers. And the market prospers when the government stops standing in its way. Tax rates were cut dramatically for the wealthy, leading to a rapid rise in income inequality.

Since the introduction of so-called Reaganomics in the 1980s, the share of the top 1 percent and top 10 percent in income and wealth has been increasing dramatically at the expense of everyone else. This is a global trend, but it has been most stark in the U.S.

This was compounded by the information revolution, creating a huge skill premium (that is, the difference in wages between skilled and unskilled workers). Pair that shift to a service-based economy with increasing de-industrialization, and this exacerbated the already widening wealth disparity. Manufacturing bases across the Rust Belt had been or were being shuttered, which accelerated job losses for blue-collar workers. As a result, inequality is now nearing levels last seen in the roaring ’20s.

The 1980s also marked the end of the era of rapid growth. In the 1960s, the U.S. economy was growing on average by more than 4 percent per year. Over the last decade, that figure stands at roughly 2 percent. The implications of fast inequality growth and slow economic growth deeply hurt those below the breadline.

Slow growth prevents the economy from mitigating the effects of rising inequality. A slower-growing pie less equally divided led to a generation worse off than its parents.

In the 40 years leading up to Trump’s first election victory, real hourly wages for Americans without college degrees — 64 percent of the population — actually shrank. Wages for workers with high school degrees dipped from $19.25 to $18.57, while workers who didn’t complete high school experienced a decline from $15.50 to $13.66.

We see the effects of this sharply in the housing market; in 2016, the average worker needed to work 40 percent longer to afford a median house than he or she did in 1976.

This exposes a deep contradiction at the very heart of capitalist democracy. If inequality is rising and most people are worse off, how could the majority keep voting for parties and presidents that perpetuate a system that doesn’t serve them?

The answer lies in the third driving force: political polarization. Politicians resort to divisive electioneering tactics to motivate voters to vote against the other side. These are often framed as an ever-growing threat to the U.S.

The topics change: the war on terror, immigration, critical race theory and gender. But the strategy is the same. Distract from the key contradiction in the system — a democracy that serves mostly the elites — by focusing anger on other issues.

The result is a political culture of ever-growing polarization and radicalization on both the right and the left. This polarization allows for the entrance into the political sphere of extreme populist positions. It also creates an opportunity to exploit a divided political system with many voters who have lost faith in the establishment for an authoritarian power grab. Trump was the first person to seize that opportunity.

Truth be told, it is amazing that another “Donald Trump” didn’t happen sooner. All it would have taken is the right presidential candidate to come along during the 2008 Obama versus McCain presidential campaign. They’d just need to weaponize the conditions set in motion by in the ’80s — slow growth, increasing inequality and growing polarization. This is the recipe for Trump’s populist power grab, which has undermined the very foundations of U.S. democratic culture.

Gilad Tanay is founder and chairperson of ERI Institute, a research firm specializing in social impact and philanthropy.

Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. 
ZIONIST OLD TESTAMENT WAR

Netanyahu: Israel reserves right to resume war in Gaza if necessary

THE WAR WILL CONTINUE

Daniel Hardaker
Sat, January 18, 2025 

Benjamin Netanyahu made the warning in a televised address on Saturday

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel would resume its war against Hamas “with full force” if the terror group breaks the ceasefire.

In a speech as Israel awaited the release of the first hostages, Mr Netanyahu said both President Biden and President Donald Trump promised him Israel had the right to resume the fighting “in new ways and with very great power” if Hamas violates the deal.

He also said his government would get the necessary weaponry from America to continue the war on Hamas.

By Saturday night, Israel was still waiting for Hamas to deliver a list with the names of the first three hostages set to be released on Sunday at 14:00 GMT.

The terror group was expected to send Israel a list with names of hostages 24 hours before their release as per the ceasefire agreement.

Mr Netanyahu’s office issued a statement, saying: “We will be unable to move forward with the framework until we receive the list of the hostages who will be released, as was agreed. Israel will not tolerate violations of the agreement. Hamas is solely responsible.”

The Israeli premier also said that his country would increase the number of troops on the Philadelphi corridor, a thin strip of land along the Egypt-Gaza border.

Mr Netanyahu’s statement appears to contradict the terms of the deal, which stipulates that Israel will “gradually reduce the forces in the corridor area during stage one”, Israeli media said.

The Israeli prime minister made the corridor a key issue in the summer when he promised not to withdraw from it unless Israel is absolutely certain that Hamas will not be able to use the area to smuggle weapons across the border.