Wednesday, April 30, 2025

 Port of L.A. executive director says retailers will soon have only about 7 weeks of full inventories left amid U.S.-China trade war

  • The U.S.-China trade war fallout has begun. The Port of Los Angeles anticipates plummeting cargo traffic until a deal on tariffs is reached, but the Trump administration has not indicated whether negotiations are happening. Time is running out, a JPMorgan chief market strategist said.

The U.S.-China trade war has begun, so say goodbye to the goods. The Port of Los Angeles anticipates a drop-off in imports next week compared to a year ago, totaling more than a third of typical incoming cargo traffic.

“It’s a precipitous drop in volume, with a number of major American retailers stopping all shipments from China based on the tariffs,” Gene Seroka, executive director of the Port of L.A., said on CNBC Tuesday morning.

While President Donald Trump pressed pause on his sweeping tariff regimen and placed a 10% blanket tax on other countries, he taxed China more. He placed a 145% tariff on China, which retaliated with a 120% duty on American goods. No trade deal has been made, and it is unclear whether there are negotiations happening. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has put the onus on China to come to the table and ink a deal. Still, just under half of the port’s business emanates from China, Seroka explained. So things could be bleak until then.

“What we’re going to see next is retailers have about five to seven weeks of full inventories left, and then the choices will lessen,” Seroka told CNBC. That doesn’t mean shelves will be empty, but in Seroka’s hypothetical, it could mean if you’re out shopping for a blue shirt, you may see 11 purple ones—but only one blue that isn’t your size and is costlier.

“Nobody wins,” he said. “China is America’s factory.” He later said: “The pain is felt on both sides of the Pacific.”

Bessent has repeatedly called the tariffs on China unsustainable because the country sells much more to the U.S. than the other way around. He appears to believe China wants a de-escalation because of the exemptions to tariffs it has introduced, but he has still threatened an escalation ladder if that isn’t the case. Nonetheless, the Trump administration, according to a recent LPL Financial note, has adopted a softer tone on China. Less than a week ago, the president floated the notion that tariffs on Chinese goods would be reduced substantially.

“We’ll see what that means, but the conciliatory tone was enough to add fuel to the market recovery,” according to LPL. So far, the three major indexes are relatively flat in early afternoon trading.

Earlier Tuesday, Gabriela Santos, JPMorgan Asset Management chief market strategist for the Americas, told CNBC: “Time is running out to see a lessening of the tariffs on China.” Everyone knows the tariffs are unsustainable, she said, but markets need to see them actually drop.

“We’re not talking about higher prices and companies figuring out ways to pass that on,” Santos said. “We’re talking about actual disruption to the supply chain.”

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

 BlackRock is piling money into the U.K. as Larry Fink claims the country has discovered its ‘capitulation point’

Larry Fink says the U.K. market is undervalued. · Fortune · Michael Nagle—Bloomberg/Getty Images

Larry Fink, CEO of the $11.6 trillion investing titan BlackRock, is used to making contrarian bets. The entire U.K. economy, much maligned in the past year, could be his latest one.

Fink says BlackRock is investing in U.K. assets “across the board” after being reassured by the Labour government’s “pro-growth” agenda, adding that the U.K. and Europe are entering a rebound era after discovering their “capitulation point.”

The 72-year-old BlackRock boss has spied an investing opportunity in the U.K., name-checking finance stocks like NatWest, Lloyds, and St. James’s Place as equities that were undervalued by a level of negativity that Fink thinks “was probably not warranted.”

In his interview with the Times, Fink pointed to several examples of shifting public practices that gave him confidence in the U.K.’s ability to discover fresh growth opportunities and argued that Keir Starmer’s government was focused on “hard issues.”

“It just resonated with me—that there are so many fundamentally strong attributes about the U.K. and Europe, and they’ve been so smothered by overregulation, by too much control,” he said. “And to me, it was just very clear we were at a capitulation point.”

Fink’s positive ruminations on the U.K. economy are a divergence from popular opinion, which has painted the U.K. as a growth laggard on the cusp of both a recession and an exodus of its richest citizens.

Businesses have complained about new national insurance obligations and flexible working policies that they argue make it harder to hire and grow. Meanwhile, there are reports that billionaires are kick-starting a mass exodus from the country owing to changes in non-dom tax regulations. Billionaire real estate investing brothers Ian and Richard Livingstone were among the latest to exit the U.K., joining thousands of others since last May’s election.

The U.K. is also facing pressure on its already tight public finances from the Donald Trump administration’s threats of widespread retaliatory tariffs that would significantly affect growth.

These pressures appear to be driving the dominant sentiment among the U.K. public.

An Ipsos MORI poll revealed 75% of Brits expect the economy to get worse over the next 12 months, marking the gloomiest sentiment among the public since the survey was launched in 1978. The group’s Economic Optimism Index registered a -68, worse than results during the cost-of-living crisis in 2022, the Global Financial Crisis in 2008, and a global recession kick-starting in 1980.

That sentiment is similar among businesses, which are beginning to build their defenses ahead of a possible recession induced by the tariff war. The U.K.’s Purchasing Managers’ Index fell to its lowest level since 2022 in March, suggesting businesses are reducing activity owing to low confidence.

Despite this evidence to the contrary, however, Fink is cheerier on the U.K. than he was in the final months of Rishi Sunak’s premiership. Bloomberg reported last year that BlackRock was among the investment groups being wooed by Chancellor Rachel Reeves to help rebuild Britain.

“I have more confidence in the U.K. economy today than I did a year ago.”

Fink laments lack of space

One obstacle that might halt BlackRock’s march on the U.K. is office space.

Fink is keen to bring all of his approximately 3,000 London employees under one roof to expedite the group’s bet on the U.K. He’s being foiled, though, by a lack of available real estate.

“I am so short of space here in London with all our acquisitions. I need an office tomorrow, but there is nothing here,” Fink told the Times.

“If I knew I could put the shovel in the ground in the next 12 months, I’d build our own.”

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

UC study uncovers unexpected link between police spending, housing prices



Breaking down the data by income level reveals large but opposite moves in home prices



University of Cincinnati




A first-of-its-kind study on the link between police budgeting and the housing market seemed to be a dead end — showing practically no relation between the spending on law enforcement and home transaction volume and prices, just like previous studies. 

But University of Cincinnati economics professor David Brasington found surprising results when he split the data between low-income and high-income communities: large, completely opposite moves in housing prices.

Brasington, PhD, published a new study called “The Effect of Increased Police Spending on House Prices and Sales Volume: A Tale of Two Types of Cities.” In it, he wrote that “the small or nonexistent link between house prices and crime found by the literature really just reflects the sum of large but opposite moves in house prices in different market segments.”

His research, published in the Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, found that voting to increase the police budget raises housing prices by about 13% in low-income communities, but lowers housing prices by at least 14% in high-income communities. 

“Nobody had split the sample between the higher- and lower-income areas,” he said. Without splitting the data, the results virtually cancel each other out. Those huge swings on opposite sides of the income range were hidden in plain sight, he said, even as economic theoretical models supported the existence of an effect of police spending on housing. 

“Just intuitively, you’d think that police services would make a difference in house prices. And it just wasn’t there in the data,” he added, “until you split the sample.” 

In his study, Brasington analyzed communities across Ohio by looking into decades of votes on taxes to increase police funding by an average of 15%. He then compares that to Ohio’s housing data from 1995 to 2018.

At the onset of his research, Brasington’s plan was to compare police tax renewals and home sale volumes. Overall, the data showed little change in volume and prices after a police funding levy. Even after dividing his sample by income, he says that there is seemingly no link between police spending and the quantity of houses sold in a community. But the decrease in home prices for high-income communities and increase in home prices in low-income communities remained consistent for at least five years following the police budget vote. 

Brasington says that the decrease in housing prices on the high end suggests police may be overfunded in richer communities. “If you cut police taxes and services, the high end views that as a good thing,” he said. “There would be an increased demand for those houses because of the tax cut and a decreased supply of houses,” he added.

He also says there could be value in looking into how other types of levies impact home prices, and what these big swings on high- and low-income areas mean for the middle class, in future research. 

But for lower-income communities, he says the data from this report suggests additional spending on crime-fighting could be worth it. “There’s something about housing demand that says, ‘We need more police funds,’” he said. 

Read the complete study.

 

Toward defining problematic media usage patterns in adolescents




JAMA Network




About The Article: This Viewpoint proposes an analogous taxonomy for digital media use that identifies patterns of use, irrespective of content, that could be problematic but, at a minimum, should be flagged as warranting further evaluation and potential remediation.

Corresponding Author: To contact the corresponding author, Dimitri A. Christakis, MD, MPH, email dimitri.christakis@seattlechildrens.org.

To access the embargoed study: Visit our For The Media website at this link https://media.jamanetwork.com/

(doi:10.1001/jama.2025.6113)

Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

#  #  #

Embed this link to provide your readers free access to the full-text article This link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2025.6113?guestAccessKey=fc50fd0f-5be4-45e1-a5df-7e2030dd1b61&utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_content=tfl&utm_term=042825