Saturday, June 28, 2025

 

Rice rebels: Research reveals the grain’s brewing benefits



Milled rice enhances nonalcoholic beer flavor by reducing aldehyde levels




University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture

Christian Schubert and Scott Lafontaine 

image: 

Christian Schubert, left, and Scott Lafontaine have published research showing how milled rice can improve nonalcoholic beer. Lafontaine is an assistant professor of food chemistry in the food science department for the Dale Bumpers College of Agricultural, Food and Life Sciences at the University of Arkansas. Lafontaine also conducts research for the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment station, the research arm of the University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture. Schubert is a visiting postdoctoral researcher from the Research Institute for Raw Materials and Beverage Analysis at Versuchs-und Lehranstalt für Brauerei — VLB — in Berlin, Germany.

view more 

Credit: U of A System Division of Agriculture photo by Paden Johnson





FAYETTEVILLE, Ark. —  Christian Schubert and Scott Lafontaine are fighting an old prejudice: that rice doesn’t belong in beer.

Now they’ve got the research to upend that ancient bit of brewing snobbery.

Schubert is a visiting postdoctoral researcher from the Research Institute for Raw Materials and Beverage Analysis, officially known as Versuchs- und Lehranstalt für Brauerei — or VLB — in Berlin. He’s joined Lafontaine, assistant professor of food chemistry in the food science department of the Dale Bumpers College of Agricultural, Food and Life Sciences.

Two studies by Schubert and Lafontaine show that rice can play a pivotal role in development of both flavor and what’s known as extract yield — the amount of fermentable sugars extracted from grains in the brewing process.

Timely innovation

The rice brewing research aligns well with recent Arkansas legislation. This spring, the state legislature passed Arkansas House Bill 1491, which creates incentives for the use of Arkansas-grown rice in beer and sake production.

Arkansas is the nation’s top rice grower, accounting for about 50 percent of U.S. rice production. However, rice breeding programs from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and an international organization are going in opposite directions for what Lafontaine’s research is showing is best for brewers.

“This research is timely because current trends in rice breeding may unintentionally work against brewing needs if brewers are not proactive in cultivar selection,” Lafontaine said. “USDA breeding programs are emphasizing higher head rice yields, which is a critical quality parameter for rice millers to increase whole kernel recovery. At the same time, the International Rice Research Institute is advancing efforts to develop low-glycemic table rice varieties, which typically feature higher amylose content and elevated gelatinization temperatures.”

While the higher head rice yield and low-glycemic traits are advantageous for food applications, Lafontaine said they directly contrast with those shown to improve brewing extract efficiency. Also, rice with lower gelatinization temperatures could save energy in the brewing process and allow for craft brewers to utilize rice.

“Without intentional sourcing and closer collaboration with rice breeders, brewers risk losing access to cultivars best suited for brewing performance,” Lafontaine said.

As the demand for both sustainability and innovation in brewing continues to grow, securing access to the right varieties of rice will be essential for ensuring continued efficiency and product quality, Lafontaine added.

Challenging perceptions

Lafontaine said rice has historically been mischaracterized as a cheap adjunct. An “adjunct” in brewing is any fermentable ingredient other than malted barley used for a variety of reasons including cost reduction, flavor enhancement, body and mouthfeel adjustment, or to achieve a specific style characteristic.

“In Germany, the Beer Purity Law, or Reinheitsgebot, has shaped cultural attitudes toward what should go into beer. But here in the U.S., we have more flexibility to explore innovation,” said Lafontaine, who is also co-director of the Arkansas Center for Beverage Innovation with the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, the research arm of the University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture.

Originally enacted in 1516, the Reinheitsgebot limited beer ingredients to water, hops, and barley malt. Yeast was included much later. While the law has protected tradition, Lafontaine said it also has created resistance to alternative ingredients like rice and stifles innovation in countries like the U.S. where the definition of beer is much more broad.

However, rice offers distinct technical and sensory benefits, Lafontaine said.  

Research tells the tale of rice and beer

The first study, titled Investigating the Incorporation of Milled Rice in Brewing Non-Alcoholic Beer to Enhance Sensory Quality,” was published in the International Journal of Food Properties and was co-authored by Nils Rettberg, head of special analytics at VLB and previously Schubert’s doctoral adviser as well as Lafontaine’s postdoctoral host.

Their results show that rice improves flavor profiles, shortens fermentation time, and may extend shelf life by limiting the production of undesirable aldehydes, which are organic compounds often associated with off-flavors and aromas.

“Dr. Schubert led the charge in redefining the role of rice in brewing,” Lafontaine said. “He’s a certified German brewmaster with extensive technical training from the VLB. From a capability standpoint, there was no one better suited to lead this project.”

Brewing with purpose

In the U.S., nonalcoholic beer is classified as having 0.5 percent or less alcohol by volume. International standards range from 0.05 to 1.2 percent, with “alcohol-free” beer typically defined as under 0.05 percent.

There are several methods to produce nonalcoholic beer. These include removing alcohol after fermentation or controlling fermentation using yeasts that do not fully metabolize malt sugars. Lafontaine and Schubert’s work focused on using Saccharomycodes ludwigii, a non-Saccharomyces yeast that cannot ferment maltose, the primary sugar from barley.

The key to rice’s success lies in its chemical composition. Unlike barley, milled rice has naturally lower levels of the unwanted aldehydes often found in nonalcoholic beer. By limiting aldehyde formation during fermentation rather than removing them afterward, brewers can reduce costs and improve product quality.

German vs. American palates

The research team also explored how rice is perceived across global markets. Using ARoma 22, a jasmine-type aromatic rice developed by the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station’s rice breeding program, the team brewed several nonalcoholic beer formulations with Saccharomycodes ludwigii.

Sensory panels in Arkansas and Germany revealed distinct preferences: Arkansas participants favored a 30-percent rice/70-percent malted barley mix, while German participants preferred the inverse. The researchers suggest that a 50-50 blend may offer the most universally appealing profile.

Flavor analysis showed that barley-heavy beers had more “worty” characteristics, while higher rice content revealed buttery, vanilla and creamy notes. Additionally, higher rice content was correlated with increased levels of larger alcohol molecules, like 3-methyl-1-butanol, which contribute positively to mouthfeel without raising the alcohol content above the legal nonalcoholic beer threshold.

Essentially, rice-based worts can make nonalcoholic beer taste more like full-strength beer.

Interestingly, fermentation also occurred faster with increased rice content, thanks to its higher levels of simple sugars such as glucose and fructose.

As consumer demand for healthier alternatives grows, especially in light of the U.S. Surgeon General’s advisory naming alcohol a leading preventable cause of cancer, Lafontaine emphasized that nonalcoholic beer is poised for growth. While nonalcoholic beer accounts for about 5 percent of the German beer market, it currently comprises just 1 percent in the U.S. but is expected to expand significantly, Lafontaine added.

Brewing with efficiency

The second study, led by food science master’s student Matthew Aitkens, focused on how rice variety impacts brewing efficiency in terms of extract yield. The study, titled Unveiling Cultivar and Agricultural Factors Influencing Extract Yield from Milled Rice,” was published in the Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists. It was co-authored by Lafontaine, Schubert, and collaborators from the experiment station’s Arkansas Rice Processing Program and the USDA’s Agricultural Research Service.

Analyzing 74 rice cultivars, the team found significant variability in extract potential. High-extract varieties tended to have lower amylose content and cracked more easily, facilitating sugar release during the mashing process. Mashing is the first step in brewing beer, where grains are soaked in hot water to convert starches to sugar.

“Identifying cultivars with higher extract yield can enhance brewhouse efficiency and reduce raw material requirements,” the study concluded.

This is an important finding, Lafontaine said, because the economic implications are considerable. Improved extract yield means less grain is needed to produce the same volume of beer, which can help brewers cut costs, reduce waste and scale production more sustainably.

Not just a filler

Another misconception, particularly among craft brewers, is that rice always has a high gelatinization temperature, which would make it challenging to use. Gelatinization is critical to brewing because it frees starches from grains that feed fermentation.

Lafontaine noted that certain varieties possess lower gelatinization temperatures, even less than 65 Celsius, or 149 Fahrenheit, making them easier to process.

“Rice isn’t just neutral filler. It’s a tool for innovation,” Lafontaine said. “It’s time we move beyond outdated perceptions and recognize what rice can offer in creating beer that’s sessionable, efficient, and aligned with both tradition and the evolving preferences of today’s consumer.”

The Brewers Association defines a “session” beer as one with alcohol by volume under 5 percent, prioritizing drinkability and balance over high alcohol levels and intensity.

The study published in the International Journal of Food Properties was supported by the USDA’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture with Grant Nos. 2024-67014-42710 and 2022-70410-38443. The study published in the Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists was supported by USDA-NIFA Grant No. 2024-67014-42710.

To learn more about the Division of Agriculture research, visit the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station website. Follow us on X at @ArkAgResearch, subscribe to the Food, Farms and Forests podcast and sign up for our monthly newsletter, the Arkansas Agricultural Research Report. To learn more about the Division of Agriculture, visit uada.edu. Follow us on X at @AgInArk. To learn about extension programs in Arkansas, contact your local Cooperative Extension Service agent or visit uaex.uada.edu.

About the Division of Agriculture

The University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture’s mission is to strengthen agriculture, communities, and families by connecting trusted research to the adoption of best practices. Through the Agricultural Experiment Station and the Cooperative Extension Service, the Division of Agriculture conducts research and extension work within the nation’s historic land grant education system. 

The Division of Agriculture is one of 20 entities within the University of Arkansas System. It has offices in all 75 counties in Arkansas and faculty on three system campuses.  

Pursuant to 7 CFR § 15.3, the University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture offers all its Extension and Research programs and services (including employment) without regard to race, color, sex, national origin, religion, age, disability, marital or veteran status, genetic information, sexual preference, pregnancy or any other legally protected status, and is an equal opportunity institution.

# # #

Scott Lafontaine, an assistant professor of food chemistry in the food science department for the Dale Bumpers College of Agricultural, Food and Life Sciences at the University of Arkansas, pours nonalcoholic beer at the Arkansas Center for Beverage Innovation. His research with the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station includes examining the impacts of milled rice as an ingredient in nonalcoholic beers.

Credit

U of A System Division of Agriculture photo by Paden Johnson

 

U.S. Study: Food and housing insecurity linked to unsafe gun storage



Findings show that there are factors beyond individual behavior or mental health driving gun violence




University of Delaware

Firearm storage realities 

image: 

Tarang Parekh, assistant professor of epidemiology, examined links between social determinants of health (SDOH) and firearm ownership and storage practices in a recently published analysis.

view more 

Credit: University of Delaware/ Photo illustration by Jeffrey C. Chase





Tarang Parekh was getting ready for work at his apartment in Houston, Texas, in 2022, when he heard gunfire. He’d never heard the sound before, except on TV, but instantly recognized it. He ran downstairs and saw a gruesome scene. It wasn’t something he ever expected to see where he lived. 

Parekh is not alone. In 2022, more than 48,000 lives were claimed by gun violence in the U.S. 

That experience inspired Parekh, now an assistant professor of epidemiology at the University of Delaware College of Health Sciences, to investigate potential links between social drivers or determinants of health (SDOH), such as housing and food insecurity, financial hardship and transportation barriers, with firearm ownership and storage practices. 

“Gun violence isn’t just about individual behavior or mental health,” Parekh said. “We need to understand the broader social conditions that drive gun ownership and influence how firearms are stored.”

Parekh teamed up with fellow epidemiologist assistant professor Jee Won Park and master of public health in epidemiology students Annaliese Pena and Meghana Bhaskar to conduct a cross-sectional analysis using self-reported data from the 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. They examined responses from nearly 63,000 adults in five states — California, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico and Ohio — where questions on both firearm storage and social factors were included in the survey.

Their analysis found that firearm ownership was more prevalent among non-Hispanic white households with higher incomes and higher education. Unsafe gun storage was more common among non-Hispanic Black and lower-income households, where SDOH and high-risk behaviors, including substance use disorders and depression, were identified. Their findings were recently published in JAMA Network Open

Among the social factors surveyed, financial hardship and housing and food insecurity were significantly associated with unsafe firearm storage practices.

“I expected to see financial hardship and living in an unsafe environment impact gun ownership and storage behaviors, but I was not expecting to see social drivers like food and housing insecurity and transportation barriers to have such a significant impact on firearm storage behaviors,” Parekh said. 

Policy and prevention

Some states, like California and Minnesota, have Child-Access Prevention (CAP) laws that make it illegal to leave guns unsecured in households with children. In these states, people were more likely to store guns safely.

According to Everytown Research & Policy, Delaware is one of 26 states with a CAP law; however, Parekh believes these laws could be stronger. California, for example, is the only state that mandates locking devices with firearm purchases. 

Gun buyback programs, which Delaware has previously held, could also be beneficial. 

“We must provide more incentives or financial benefits,” said Parekh, pointing to Canada and New Zealand, where buyback programs have been more successful.

Identifying the root causes

Parekh’s findings call for a shift in focus on individual mental health to systemic socioeconomic factors as keys to understanding the behaviors that drive gun ownership.

“Whenever we hear about mass shootings, the ‘dangerous people’ phenomenon arises,” explained Parekh. “We must shift our focus and determine why the person owns a gun and whether housing insecurity or living in an unsafe environment influences their behavior, instead of jumping to the conclusion that the person has mental health issues.” 

The COVID-19 pandemic also fueled gun ownership. 

“After COVID, there was a massive jump in firearm ownership, especially among racial minority populations, where owning a gun made them feel safer,” Parekh said. 

The most effective solutions, he believes, lie in community-based education and support. 

“We constantly talk about changing laws, but laws alone won’t solve the problem,” Parekh said. “We need to invest in our communities to improve the social and environmental factors that contribute to firearm ownership.” 

Next, Parekh plans to investigate differences in state gun laws and their intersection with SDOH. 

“Gun ownership and safe storage aren’t just about Second Amendment rights,” he said. “It’s about understanding why people feel the need to own a firearm in the first place — and how making our communities safer could change that decision.”

Deeper sleep is more likely to lead to eureka moments



In an insight test with a nap, participants that got deeper sleep had more “aha” moments



PLOS

Deeper sleep is more likely to lead to eureka moments 

image: 

Overnight insights, the “a-ha” moments we’ve probably all experienced after a nap, are especially likely in the N2 deep sleep stage, according to new research.

view more 

Credit: Diego Perez-Lopez, PLOS (CC-BY 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)





“Sleeping on it,” especially dropping deeper than a doze, might help people gain insight into certain kinds of tasks, according to a study published June 26th in the open-access journal PLOS Biology by Anika Löwe, Marit Petzka, Maria Tzegka and Nicolas Schuck from the Universität Hamburg, Germany, and colleagues.

Humans sometimes find that they have a sudden “eureka” moment on a problem they’ve been working on, producing sudden insight or breakthroughs. Scientists have yet to have their own “aha” moment of insight on how it might work, though sleep appears to play a role. To better understand how sleep might lead to insight while problem-solving, the authors of this pre-registered study asked 90 people to track a series of dots across a screen. The participants were given instructions about a seemingly simple task that merely involved responding to the dots on a keyboard, but the instructions left out a trick that could make the task easier. After four sets of trials, the subjects were put down for a 20-minute nap, hooked up to an electroencephalogram (EEG) to track their sleep.

After their nap, the subjects were tested again, and 70.6 percent of participants had their “aha” moment, figuring out the unmentioned trick that made the task easier. All groups improved after their rest period, but 85.7 percent of those who achieved the first deeper sleep phase—called N2 sleep—had their breakthrough. In contrast, 55.5 percent of those who stayed awake and 63.6 of those who dropped into light, N1 sleep experienced a moment of insight. Studies of the EEG patterns showed that a steeper spectral slope, associated with deeper sleep, was also associated with an “aha” moment. While the study did not compare people who rested or napped to those who didn’t get a break, a previous study by the authors that used the same task (but did not give participants a chance to nap) found 49.6% experienced “aha” moments. Thus, the authors suggest that a nap with deeper, N2 sleep might help someone who needs a moment of insight.

Coauthor Nicolas Schuck notes, “It’s really intriguing that a short period of sleep can help humans make connections they didn’t see before. The next big question is why this happens. We hope that our discovery that it may be linked to the EEG spectral slope is a good first lead."

Anika Löwe says, “The EEG spectral slope has only recently been considered as a factor in cognitive processes during sleep. I find the link between the spectral slope steepness during sleep, aha-moments after sleep and the down regulation of weights - which we identified as crucial for aha-moments in our previous computational work - very exciting.”

Löwe adds, “I think a lot of us have made the subjective experience of having important realizations after a short nap. It’s really nice to not only have data on that, but also a first direction of what processes are behind this phenomenon.”

Löwe concludes, “What really struck me when telling people in my environment - particularly creatives - about these findings was how much they resonated with people. Many of them could relate to our results with a personal experience of having a (creative) breakthrough after a nap.”

 

In your coverage, please use this URL to provide access to the freely available paper in PLOS Biologyhttps://plos.io/4jc8ekm

Citation: Löwe AT, Petzka M, Tzegka MM, Schuck NW (2025) N2 sleep promotes the occurrence of ‘aha’ moments in a perceptual insight task. PLoS Biol 23(6): e3003185. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003185

Author countries: Germany

Funding: ATL is supported by the International Max Planck Research School on Computational Methods in Psychiatry and Ageing Research (IMPRS COMP2PSYCH, www.mps.ucl-centre.mpg.de). NWS was funded by the Federal Government of Germany and the State of Hamburg as part of the Excellence Initiative, a Starting Grant from the European Union (ERC-StG-REPLAY-852669), and an Independent Max Planck Research Group grant awarded by the Max Planck Society (M.TN.A.BILD0004). We acknowledge financial support from the Open Access Publication Fund of Universität Hamburg. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

 

Public attitudes around solar geoengineering become less politically partisan with more familiarity



PLOS





Public attitudes around solar geoengineering become less politically partisan with more familiarity, suggesting that increasing public awareness of the technology could foster bipartisan engagement.

###

Article URL: https://plos.io/4elOWIw

Article Title: Political ideology and views toward solar geoengineering in the United States

Author Countries: United Kingdom, United States

Funding: RMA and BM's work is supported by Caltech’s Resnick Sustainability Institute. DE's work on this project was originally supported by Caltech's Resnick Sustainability Institute while he was a PhD Candidate at Caltech. RD's work is supported by the Cambridge Arts, Humanities and Social Science (AHSS) Grants and the Bill \& Melinda French Gates Foundation (OPP1144).

 

COVID-19 pandemic significantly eroded American public’s trust in US public health institutions like the CDC, shows longitudinal assessment from 2020-2024



However, over the same period, trust in personal doctors, local health departments, and the White House increased





PLOS

COVID-19 pandemic significantly eroded American public’s trust in US public health institutions like the CDC, shows longitudinal assessment from 2020-2024 

image: 

Percentage of US adults reporting high confidence in public health organizations.

view more 

Credit: Melchinger et al., 2025, PLOS Global Public Health, CC-BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)





Four discrete cross-sectional surveys of US adults from 2020-2024 reveal US adults reporting high confidence in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) dropped from 82 percent in February 2020 to a low of 56 percent in June 2022, according to a study published June 26, 2025 in the open-access journal PLOS Global Public Health by Amyn A. Malik and colleagues from UT Southwestern Medical Center, United States.

Surveys have shown the US public’s trust in public health entities has decreased since the COVID-19 pandemic reached the United States in 2020. This study is one of the first academic work to longitudinally assess US adults’ perception of health entities from 2020 to 2024.  

 From February 2020 to October 2024, the authors conducted four surveys of a census-matched sample of US adults (sample sizes were 718, 672, 856, and 828 respectively). Surveys 1 and 2 asked questions on the COVID-19 pandemic, while surveys 3 and 4 asked questions around the 2022 and 2024 mpox outbreaks; all surveys also asked participants their perceptions of public health entities, who they thought should lead the US response to infectious disease outbreaks, and how they would rate their confidence in various public health entities. 

The authors found a significant decline in mean confidence among US adults in health institutions including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), with respondents reporting high confidence in the CDC dropping from 82 percent in February 2020 to a low of 56 percent in June 2022. Reported high confidence in the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services, state health departments, and professional medical organizations followed a similar pattern (dropping by 25 percent, 13 percent, 16 percent, and 26 percent respectively in the same time period). Though confidence in their own doctor and local health departments also decreased in the early years of the pandemic, from February 2020-June 2022, respondents’ confidence in their doctors and local health departments increased by 5 percent and 19 percent respectively from 2022 to 2024. High confidence in the White House increased from 29 percent in February 2020 to 39 percent by October 2024.

 These results suggest local health entities, including personal doctors and local health departments, could play a key role in reestablishing trust in American public health institutions and interventions.

Co-author Hannah Melchinger adds: “Overall, Americans’ trust in public health entities has decreased since 2020 – we need to take this decline seriously if we want to preserve the credibility of these entities and their public health recommendations.”  

 Senior Author Amyn A. Malik summarizes: “Even though overall trust in healthcare institutions has decreased, healthcare providers remain one of the most trusted sources of health information in the US. As trusted communicators, doctors, nurses, and other healthcare staff will play an essential role in rebuilding Americans’ confidence in their public health organizations.”

####

In your coverage please use this URL to provide access to the freely available article in PLOS Global Public Healthhttps://plos.io/4li9weX

Citation: Melchinger H, Omer SB, Malik AA (2025) Change in confidence in public health entities among US adults between 2020–2024. PLOS Glob Public Health 5(6): e0004747. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004747

Author Countries: United States

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.