Saturday, July 19, 2025

 

Source: Resilience

If we want local food systems to thrive, every link in the chain must be nurtured: seeds must be saved, farmers must earn a fair price, processors must adapt their methods—and consumers must be able to afford to buy the final product. Crafting a story and connecting people are centrally important to successfully cultivating biodiversity, as Belgian farmer Tijs Boelens has found out in his work to integrate heritage grains into the supply chain. Portrait by Adèle Pautrat.

Tijs Boelens didn’t grow up with heritage grains. When he started out as a market gardener at the De Groentelaar farm with three other people, he had little faith in them. Based on the knowledge he had at the time, yields of heritage grains seemed far too low to seriously consider reintegrating them into viable farming systems.

At the initiative of one of his colleagues, who was passionate about biodiversity, three local grain varieties were nonetheless sown on the farm. Tijs—curious and gradually inspired by his colleague’s seed-saving activities—began multiplying the Heliaro variety. Often mistaken for a traditional landrace because of its suitability for biodynamic farming, Heliaro actually combines a rustic appearance with the agronomic performance typical of modern wheat.

Treasures of the terroir—with technical constraints

Through his involvement in a Local Action Group, Tijs was invited in 2017 to take part in the Let’s Liberate Diversity forum, held at the Hayon farm in Belgium. There, he became aware of the true significance of the work he and his colleagues had been doing—somewhat naively—with heritage varieties, or landraces (‘variétés de pays’) as he prefers to call them.

“I realised that the key issue in what we do isn’t producing wheat in large quantities, but rather multiplying rare local varieties, which are a real treasure for the development of our regional terroirs.”

Through the Local Action Group, Tijs was already involved in a project to reconnect the region’s mills and bakeries with the production of local cereals. He considered using traditional varieties within this framework but quickly faced a technical and economic reality: the yields per hectare of ancient varieties were too low—mainly due to the limited availability of seeds and their lower productivity—to meet the production and processing requirements of the project.

I asked Tijs about the difference in yields between ancient and modern wheat. He gave me concrete figures: with ancient varieties, he currently harvests between 3 and 4 tons per hectare, compared to 6 to 8 tons per hectare in organic farming for modern varieties.

This imbalance makes the equation particularly complex: how to guarantee a fair income for farmers and an affordable price for consumers?

It’s particularly difficult for the bakery sector. Artisanal bread already fetches high prices—up to €6 for an organic sourdough loaf in Belgium—which limits accessibility, a problematic issue for a basic staple.

From baking in complexity to brewing a solution

Tijs then came up with the idea to turn to other partners: brewers. Unlike bread, beer can more easily be sold at a higher price—provided it is associated with a strong, meaningful story.

This is how he started a collaboration with the 3 Fonteinen brewery, located in the Pajottenland region. Seeds4All has already dedicated two articles to this project, which we invite you to read or reread: here and here.

At the time, Tijs chose the 3 Fonteinen because it produces lambic and gueuze, traditional beers historically brewed using the “petit rouge du Brabant,” a local wheat that Tijs was seeking to reintroduce in his region. The brewery, for its part, clearly wished to deepen its roots in the local terroir. The partnership between the two built around two complementary goals—the search for a lost wheat variety and the pursuit of terroir quality—anchored firmly in locality.

As part of this collaboration, Tijs and his partner Lucas van den Abeele (see the articles mentioned above) embarked on an extensive quest for heritage varieties. They gathered samples from gene banks, farms, and conservation associations across Belgium, England, Wales, Ireland, Georgia, France, and more.

The trials were conducted at the De Groentelaar farm, where season after season Tijs built a rich collection of varieties that he still stores today in refrigerators. His passion and commitment to cereal diversity officially took a central place in his work.

Tijs’s primary goal is not to create diversity for its own sake: he does not seek to develop or combine all the varieties he collects. What he aims for is the preservation and multiplication of landraces as well as other varieties he deems relevant according to conditions, uses, or needs he identifies locally.

“If you mix everything together, you lose key phenotypic specificities. You always have to be careful to conserve as many varieties intact as possible, while also experimenting with blends.”

His approach to variety management is based on dynamic management. Each year, Tijs selects certain varieties to cultivate depending on ongoing collaborations, specific requests from his partners—or simply his own interests. He recalls, for example, that one year his sole goal was to showcase a highly diverse selection of ancient wheat to the public as part of awareness-raising activities.

Fermenting local wheat, adapting to local tastes

Never short of projects, in 2019 Tijs decided to develop, in collaboration with the Brussels brewery De la Senne, a new beer which he named Teirf—a word from a Flemish dialect meaning “local wheat.”

After a few trials, the brewery decided not to continue with the project. Tijs explains the reasons as follows: with traditional varieties, it is difficult to create recipes that are perfectly reproducible, capable of guaranteeing a consistent taste from one batch to another.

This challenge was much less of an issue for the production of lambics and gueuzes, whose long fermentation—typical of these traditional beers—naturally causes variations from one batch to the next. This is even an integral part of the product’s identity. But for more standard beers, this instability is a major drawback in the minds of many brewers.

In 2023, after a break forced by the pandemic, Tijs revived the Teirf project with a new partner: the Belgoo brewery, located in Sint-Pieters-Leeuw, just a few kilometres from his farm. This time, the collaboration took root. The beer was created, circulated, and won over consumers — today it can be found in organic grocery stores in Brussels. (And yes, we’ve tasted it: it’s definitely worth trying!)

Crafting a cooperative—and a peasant beer

Tijs’s ambitions don’t stop there. Thanks to networking in recent years, he is now surrounded by an increasing number of cereal growers, brewers, and bakers. His goal is to motivate them to create a cooperative dedicated to the promotion of products made from local varieties, grown and processed entirely locally.

Within this framework, for example, Teirf could become a type of beer rather than a brand or name — as with IPA for example. It would then embody a very particular identity: that of a peasant beer, based on a specification that values both cultivated biodiversity and wild biodiversity. Each member brewery of the cooperative could then produce its own version of Teirf.

In connection with this cooperative project, Tijs is currently in discussions with the network of artisan bakers (RAB — which brings together about twenty artisan bakeries from Wallonia and Brussels), two Flemish bakeries, one pizzeria, and several breweries. But rallying people around cultivated biodiversity is far from easy.

Motivating farmers, first and foremost, is a delicate task. As Tijs humorously puts it, “getting farmers moving is like trying to push a wheelbarrow full of frogs.” Solidarity among farmers certainly exists — despite decades of industrialisation that have weakened it. But solidarity does not automatically turn into cooperation. It takes time, listening, and a strong enough collective vision to inspire people to commit.

Convincing processors is no easier. Heritage varieties, often unstable during processing, require extensive adaptation. Adjusting recipes, rethinking working methods, revising infrastructure — all this demands specific technical expertise, time, and often investments that artisans cannot always afford.

Finally, consumers must be engaged. In a short supply chain without intermediaries, the connection between producers and consumers is direct. This requires full transparency and the ability to explain, persuade, and build loyalty.

Shaping a living narrative around shared convictions

According to Tijs, the sine qua non for the success of such a collective endeavour lies in the clarity and strength of the common goal. There must be a deep alignment of convictions, a shared vision that inspires trust and determination — because endurance and courage are needed to take on such a vast undertaking as transforming agri-food systems.

For Tijs, the symbolic dimension — what he calls “mythology” — is absolutely essential in any collective transition. Of course, scientific arguments, whether nutritional, agronomic, or ecological, play a role in demonstrating the value of alternative varieties. But in many cases, these arguments, however sound, remain too abstract or too disconnected from people’s everyday experiences.

What truly makes a difference and genuinely mobilises people is the story being told. A story rooted in real facts, enriched with anecdotes and gestures that may sometimes be partially reinvented but always carry meaning. It’s not about indulging in fiction for its own sake but about shaping a living narrative that speaks to the heart, builds connections, and inspires commitment.

Invisible ties take centre stage

In this spirit, Tijs has already collaborated with the multidisciplinary collective Future Farmers, whose performances and artistic interventions explore the visible and invisible links between humans and cereals.

The next performative project imagined by Future Farmers will take place next September, marking the inauguration of the very first mill installed inside a Brussels café, Café Mazette. This venue, already committed to making its own artisanal breads using natural sourdough, aims to go further in its quality standards and short supply chain approach by producing its own flour on-site too.

Tijs will supply them with the grains, and for the first delivery, the Future Farmers collective has conceived a staging that is both poetic and political: a boat will travel up the Senne canal from Hal to central Brussels, carrying sacks of grain. Once docked, a festive procession will take over, transporting the sacks to the Jeu de Balle square, where Café Mazette is located.

This powerful action highlights the invisible routes that connect rural areas to cities — especially regarding food supply. It embodies, both symbolically and concretely, the vital role of short supply chains and pays tribute to the work of local artisans who tirelessly strive to ensure the diversity and quality of the products we eat and drink.

Guided by goodwill and trust

In addition to being a passionate seed artisan, Tijs is truly a craftsman of the collective. To conduct this interview, I agreed to accompany him on his weekly delivery round in Brussels — because Tijs is also a market gardener, and his farm supplies vegetables to cafés and restaurants in the capital.

At every stop, the same scene plays out: smiles, handshakes, news about projects, laughter. It becomes clear that Tijs relies heavily on goodwill, trust, and the confidence he inspires in others to bring people together, spark collaborations, and persuade others to work with him — and with each other. Deep down, this may well be his guiding principle.

But this gift for building connections comes at a cost: it requires a great deal of time, and that time cannot be monetised. Tijs is fully aware of this, and is now paying increasing attention to the need to structure and sustainably fund his vision of a small-scale, farmer-led supply chain.

This September, we’ll have the pleasure of welcoming Tijs as one of the speakers at our workshop held as part of the 14th edition of the Let’s Liberate Diversity forum. Entitled Seed Diversity Down to Earth, the workshop will take a grounded look at the practical needs and bold ideas shaping the infrastructure, exchange systems, and public/private support needed to boost genetic diversity on farms and plates. See you there?Email

Adèle Pautrat has a degree in political science and international cooperation, and has developed an expertise on agro-ecological transition and agrobiodiversity issues, while working as a coordinator for the Belgian NGO Artemisia. She is now in charge of the integration of the Seeds4all project in the scope of work of ARC2020, also providing iconography missions for the NGO. As a second activity, Adèle works as a freelance photographer.

 

Source: Pressenza

Despite having over 5,000 plastic-producing industries, Bangladesh has fewer than 300 mostly informal recycling plants, leaving it ill-equipped to handle the 400 tons of daily plastic waste, including 646 tons from Dhaka alone. Of the estimated 87,000 tonnes of single-use plastic consumed annually, only 37% is recycled. Methane from open dumpsites worsens air quality, while 63% of plastic waste clogs drainage systems and contaminates rivers, forests, and coastal ecosystems. These cumulative impacts have caused Dhaka to frequently rank among the dirtiest cities in the world.

Addressing this crisis requires action across the entire plastic lifecycle—from production to disposal. A five-pronged strategy can help tackle root causes and enable sustainable, inclusive solutions.

1. Reducing Plastic Production at the Source

    The most effective way to reduce plastic waste is to limit its generation from the outset. One powerful intervention is the promotion of refill systems for everyday consumer goods. Products like shampoo, cooking oil, detergent, and cleaning agents don’t need new plastic containers every time.

    By scaling up refillable packaging models, we can:

    • Minimize demand for virgin plastic
    • Shift both consumer and industry behaviors
    • Reduce the volume of plastic entering the environment

    2. Promoting Biodegradable Alternatives

      Biodegradable and compostable options such as jute-based packaging or maize-stalk extract bags must become more available, affordable, and mainstream. Investing in local innovation and the production of sustainable materials is key.

      To scale these alternatives:

      • Public-private partnerships and government incentives are needed
      • Regulatory infrastructure (e.g., Bangladesh Standards and Testing Institution (BSTI) certification technology and systems) must be improved to standardize quality and safety
      • Support for research and development can position Bangladesh as a global leader in sustainable packaging, building on our historical strengths in jute production.

      3. Recycling and Upcycling: Turning Waste into Wealth

      Plastic waste can be transformed into valuable products through recycling and upcycling innovations, such as:

      • Pyrolysis: Converting plastic into reusable fuel (pyrolysis oil)
      • Shredded plastic products: Manufacturing household goods, furniture, bricks, or tiles
      • Putting waste workers at the center of waste management and social entrepreneurship: Engaging waste workers directly in the recycling value chain enhancing their income, dignity, and role in the circular economy

      However, barriers to scaling these solutions include:

      • Lack of standards and quality certification
      • Regulatory challenges
      • Market competition with imported fuels (e.g., diesel)

      Strategic investment and policy reforms are essential to unlock the full potential of these technologies.

      4. Applying the 3Rs: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle

      Although Bangladesh adopted a National 3Rs Strategy in 2010, its implementation remains limited even after a decade and a half. The absence of waste segregation at source continues to hinder recycling efforts.

      To strengthen the 3Rs approach:

      • Nationwide awareness campaigns on plastic pollution and responsible plastic use are needed
      • All formal and informal facilities (households and commercial entities) must have waste bins for at least three waste categories
      • Infrastructure for household-level segregation must be developed
      • Targeted interventions should focus on informal and semi-urban areas, where systems are weakest

      5. Driving Behavioral Change

      Behavioral shifts are central to any sustainable waste management strategy. For example:

      • While many urban consumers use cloth or jute bags at supermarkets, single-use plastics still dominate informal marketplaces
      • Promoting the use of reusable containers for daily essentials can reduce packaging waste
      • Tackling the social stigma around refilling and reuse is critical to making circular models viable
      • Incorporating plastic pollution and responsible plastic use into the school curriculum is essential for long-term change

      Behavioral change is not only about awareness, but it also requires accessible systems and incentives that make sustainable choices easier for individuals and businesses alike.

      Cross-Sector Coordination Is Key

      Tackling plastic pollution in Bangladesh is a complex but solvable challenge, and success depends on strong coordination across sectors, especially among key government actors:

      • The Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Cooperatives (LGRD): through LGED and city corporations; manages waste collection and disposal
      • The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) leads on policy and regulatory frameworks
      • The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare plays a vital role in medical waste management

      Beyond government, stronger, long-term collaboration is essential among NGOs (e.g., Practical Action, BRAC, Arannayak Foundation) and corporates (e.g., Bangladesh Petrochemical Company Ltd.(BPCL), Unilever) leading projects on waste worker empowerment, plastic recycling, and circular economy models. By sharing insights, aligning goals, and supporting one another, these actors can create broader, more lasting impact. Together—with the right mix of policy reform, community engagement, innovation, and inclusive partnerships—we can move closer to a circular economy that serves both people and the planet.

      Support from governments, donors, innovators, and allies is also crucial—not just to protect the environment, but to restore dignity, income, and opportunity for communities most affected by plastic pollution. NGOs must actively seek funding, forge strategic alliances, and tell powerful stories that highlight both the resilience of waste workers and the transformative promise of circular solutions.

      Rizwana Akhter is an environment enthusiast and development professional with over 23 years of experience. This article is based on her personal research and professional insights, does not reflect the views of any organization.

       

      Source: Originally published by Z. Feel free to share widely.

      At a time when international cooperation provides the key to preventing a variety of global calamities―including nuclear war, climate catastrophe, and massive starvation―it’s tragic that major nations, ruled by nationalist, rightwing parties, are on a collision course with the organizations that represent the international community.

      Chief among these international organizations is the United Nations, with a Charter that bans “the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.” Nevertheless, ignoring this ban, the Russian government has engaged since February 2022 in a massive military invasion and occupation of Ukraine, the Israeli government has continued a brutal occupation and military bombardment of Gaza, and the President of the United States has ordered the bombing of Iran and talked glibly of seizing GazaGreenland, and the Panama Canal.

      These same nations have refused to comply with or stymied the mandates of numerous key international organizations.

      The Russian government has refused to abide by the February 2022 ruling of the International Court of Justice that Russia cease its military invasion of Ukraine immediately, has defied repeated votes by the UN General Assembly condemning its invasion, occupation, and annexation of Ukraine, and has rejected compliance with an International Criminal Court’s arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin for his regime’s kidnapping of Ukrainian children. In the UN Security Council, Russia used its veto to frustrate international denunciation of its war on Ukraine and condemnation of Russian annexation of Ukrainian territory.

      The Israeli government has spurned vast numbers of UN General Assembly resolutions calling for fair treatment of Palestinians and an end to Israeli occupation of their land or to honor the International Criminal Court’s arrest warrant for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for war crimes against humanity in Gaza.

      For its part, the U.S. government, under the new administration of Donald Trump, belittled the United Nations, pulled the United States out of the World Health Organizationabandoned the UN Human Rights Councilsuspended U.S. payment for the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, and announced a review of its membership in the UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. It also employed its veto to block passage of a UN Security Council resolution demanding a permanent ceasefire in Gaza.

      The fervent resistance of these governments to international authority is illustrated by their vehement responses to the work of the International Criminal Court (ICC), a global juridical entity endorsed by 125 nationsIn Russia, the government opened criminal cases against the prosecutor and judges of the court, while former President Dmitry Medvedev publicly threatened to target the court with missile strikes. In Israel, Prime Minister Netanyahu fiercely denounced the ICC warrant for his arrest as an “antisemitic act” by a corrupt prosecutor and biased judges. In the United States, President Trump issued an executive order in early February 2025 imposing economic and travel sanctions against the ICC prosecutor, establishing a framework for imposing additional sanctions on ICC officials, and directing the U.S. officials to submit the names of other individuals to be targeted.

      Indeed, the Trump administration has launched an all-out attack on the work of international institutions, especially the United Nations. In February, Trump ordered a six-month review of U.S. membership in all international organizations, conventions, and treaties with a view toward reducing funding, ending funding, or simply withdrawing from them. This review included a critical examination of the United Nations, with the result that the administration’s 2026 budget proposal reduced UN funding by 87 percent. This draconic UN budget cut will drastically undermine the World Food Program, assistance to children (e.g. UNICEF), refugee, migration, disaster relief, family planning, and economic development programs, the International Court of Justice, the International Atomic Energy Agency, and UN peacekeeping missions, with disastrous consequences. Global starvation, for example, is now widespread, with acute hunger confronting 343 million people in 74 nations.

      Meanwhile, in Congress, Republican legislators have introduced bills in the Senate and the House to terminate U.S. membership in the United Nations and affiliated institutions. Representative Chip Roy of Texas, a MAGA stalwart, declared that it was time to dissociate the United States from “this corrupt globalist organization.”

      Despite these attacks and a retreat from international responsibility by other nations, it remains possible that international organizations can weather the rightwing, nationalist storm. At the United Nations, Secretary-General António Guterres has been working to modernize and streamline the UN system’s structure, priorities, and operations to meet the new challenges it faces. Nevertheless, given the need to reduce the UN core budget by 20 percent, his new UN80 reform plan does call for thousands of job cuts.

      A more promising solution to the problems created by nationalist ideologues in major nations is for other nations to pick up the slack in supporting international institutions. The European Union (EU) is particularly well positioned to assume this role, for it generally favors multilateral action to address global challenges. And it also possesses substantial financial resources. Together with Britain and some potential non-Western partners, such as Japan and South Korea, the EU could substitute for the United States in bolstering the United Nations and other organizations that now provide the rudiments of cooperative global governance.

      In addition, it’s certainly possible that, given the inability of governments with a narrow nationalist approach to effectively address contemporary global problems, they will sooner or later be replaced by governments better able to cope with the modern world.

      Of course, the League of Nations and the hope of international cooperation were destroyed in the 1930s thanks to the rise of rightwing, hyper-nationalist regimes, and a comparable process might be unfolding today.

      Even so, with the onset of World War II, most people finally realized that narrow nationalism had to give way to global cooperation. Let’s hope that it won’t take another world war or comparable catastrophe to convince people again.


      Dr. Lawrence Wittner, syndicated by PeaceVoice, is Professor of History emeritus at SUNY/Albany and the author of Confronting the Bomb (Stanford University Press).

      LA REVUE GAUCHE - Left Comment: Search results for Lawrence S. Wittner