Tuesday, February 24, 2026

 

Plant hormone therapy could improve global food security





Colorado State University
Arabidopsis thaliana 

image: 

By genetically manipulating the hormonal response of a commonly studied plant, Arabidopsis thaliana, scientists have harnessed the best of both worlds – immunity and productivity – and they believe this can be reproduced in crops. Credit: Colorado State University

view more 

Credit: Colorado State University





Plants have an immune system, like people, and when it is triggered by threats like disease or pests, a plant's defenses are activated. But there’s a downside to this protective mechanism: The plant’s growth is suppressed when its immune system is turned on.

Colorado State University researchers have found a way to boost a plant’s growth while maintaining its immunity through a hormone treatment that shows promise for food production.

A plant threatened by disease will defend itself by producing hormones that can keep the plant alive but also stunt its growth – which is a problem if the plant is needed for food. By genetically manipulating the hormonal response of a commonly studied plant, scientists have harnessed the best of both worlds – immunity and productivity – and they believe this can be reproduced in crops. Their findings were published Feb. 23 in Current Biology.

"Only time will tell once it's integrated into crops what effect this will have, but it does have the potential to be as big of a breakthrough as the Green Revolution 60 years ago in terms of food security,” said Cris Argueso, an associate professor in CSU’s Department of Agricultural Biology and senior author of the study.

During the Green Revolution, geneticist and plant pathologist Norman Borlaug identified a wheat mutation that dramatically increased yield. He developed cultivars that were grown around the world, preventing famine. Borlaug is credited with saving a billion people from starvation and received a Nobel Peace Prize for his discovery. Downsides of the Green Revolution included widespread use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides and environmental degradation.

If the CSU researchers are successful in genetically altering crops to be more productive and disease resistant, the crops will need less fertilizer to grow and fewer chemicals to prevent disease, making this revolution “greener.” Of course, adding fertilizer will always enhance growth, even in plants that are naturally productive; but for now, the researchers are focused on integrating these beneficial traits into important food crops – wheat, corn and soybeans.

“We want to create crop plants that can defend really well against pathogens but don't have a yield penalty, which is the dream for farmers,” Argueso said. "We joke that this is the ‘green’ Green Revolution.”

The plant’s ‘chemical brain’

One similarity between Borlaug’s work and Argueso’s is that her lab is also working with a hormone mutant. The researchers studied a model plant species called Arabidopsis thaliana, also known as thale cress, a well-known plant in the mustard family. They selected plants of this species that had an autoimmune mutation that prevents them from thriving – like having an autoimmune disorder. 

Plants react to the constantly changing conditions surrounding them through plant-specific hormones called phytohormones. Argueso calls this the plant’s “chemical brain.” When plants are stressed by pests or disease, cytokinin hormones, which are responsible for cell division, are suppressed in a growth-defense tradeoff. By understanding phytohormone interactions and restoring cytokinin levels in the plants with overactive immune systems, the scientists were able to restart growth without negatively impacting the plant’s defenses. In fact, the plants they designed were even more resistant to disease.

While the researchers’ approach relies on genetic manipulation to change a plant’s chemical signals, it is much faster and easier than identifying and altering the specific gene responsible by mapping the plant’s entire genome, as is standard practice for modifying crop traits. Argueso likens their simpler solution to how a doctor might prescribe a pill to correct a chemical imbalance. She expects the mutations they’ve developed to be useful for agriculture for decades.

“We are exploring collaborations with breeding programs across the world, so this can be tested in different regions with all sorts of crops,” Argueso said. "If these mutations have the potential that we think they do, we would like them to be used everywhere.”

Student research

The study was funded by the National Science Foundation and led by Grace Johnston, who conducted the research as a student. Johnston was recruited into Argueso’s lab as an undergraduate biology student and wrote the paper as her master’s thesis. She is now a research associate in the lab.

"I did not know I wanted to do plant science,” said Johnston, who credits Argueso’s mentoring for her achievement and love of plant biology. "By the time I was done with my undergrad degree, we still didn't know enough about these plants, and I just couldn't let it go.”

Johnston received prestigious fellowships from the National Science Foundation and the American Society of Plant Biologists to support her work while earning her undergraduate and graduate degrees.

"This is a CSU research success story,” Johnston said. "Cris took me on when I didn’t know anything about science, and here we are eight years later, and we have the opportunity to actually impact food security.”

Argueso is passionate about inspiring young researchers like Johnston. Students from her lab have gone on to receive important national and international awards, and currently three undergraduate researchers are part of her team.

Second author Hannah Berry was a CSU Cell and Molecular Biology graduate student in Argueso’s lab; she is now a scientist at Pairwise, a plant biotechnology and gene-editing company. Co-author Hitoshi Sakakibara, a plant science professor at Nagoya University and the RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science in Japan, is one of the top plant hormone quantification experts in the world. Mikiko Kojima, a scientist at the RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, also contributed to the study.

EPA criminal sanctions align with a county’s

wealth, not pollution




Washington State University




PULLMAN, Wash. – When the federal government brings its toughest environmental enforcement actions against polluters, they tend to be in communities of greater wealth, not the most polluted places.

That’s the takeaway from a new paper co-authored by a Washington State University researcher that examined criminal prosecutions by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency from 2011 to 2020 in every U.S. county. The findings were published in the journal Nature Sustainability.

“You might reasonably expect the government to use its most consequential enforcement mechanism in the counties that are the most polluted,” said Erik Johnson, a professor in WSU’s Department of Sociology and a co-author of the new paper. “But it turns out they use it in the wealthier counties more. The more educated and wealthy the county is, the more likely the government is to enforce environmental regulations.”

Criminal prosecutions, which can result in jail time, substantial fines and tax penalties, are the most serious enforcement actions taken by the EPA for violations of laws such as the Clean Water Act and Clean Air Act. They are much rarer than civil cases, where the EPA may seek monetary fines.

Drawing on a dataset of 732 criminal prosecutions brought in 432 of the 3,143 U.S. counties, the team mapped where enforcement actions occurred and analyzed correlations among a range of socioeconomic and environmental factors. Past research has established that low-income people and people of color face disproportionate environmental harm, and federal regulators have at times adjusted their priorities to bring more attention to these disparities.

But in the recent analysis, the strongest correlation was found between enforcement actions and higher socioeconomic status. According to the findings, a county ranked in the 84th percentile of socioeconomic measures would have 24% more enforcement actions than a county at the median of socioeconomic measures, on average. This trend held true in both the Obama and first Trump administrations.

 Researchers found no correlation between enforcement and measures of water and air quality, as tracked in the EPA’s Environmental Quality Index. Counties with better land quality were actually more likely to see increased enforcement actions.

The researchers said the study does not make any claims about the overall prevalence of environmental crimes, given that environmental violations are underreported and rarely rise to the level of federal prosecution. Among the possible reasons for the enforcement pattern is a growing focus by regulators on individuals and smaller companies, as large industrial polluters – which are responsible for the most pollution – are often able to settle cases or avoid prosecution based on their legal resources. 

There also may be institutional dynamics related to resource constraints, legal barriers, agency leadership and other organizational factors.

“These geographic patterns in EPA criminal prosecutions aren’t necessarily a result of an intentional or overt process,” said Pierce Greenberg, an assistant professor of sociology at Clemson University and lead author of the paper. “We're trying to identify the geographic patterning, and offer some explanations for why that might be. For example, counties that are farther away from a criminal enforcement office have fewer criminal prosecutions. So these organizational and institutional factors may be driving some of these trends.”

Greenberg earned his PhD at WSU in 2018, then worked at Creighton University before moving to Clemson. The other co-authors were Jennifer Schwartz, James F. Short Distinguished Professor in the Department of Sociology at WSU, and Rylie Wartinger, a graduate student at Clemson.

Johnson said the disparities in enforcement – which fit into the larger context of how widening income inequality plays out in people’s lives — raise questions about how well enforcement actions align with the purpose of environmental laws.

“What's the enforcement doing?” he said. “Is it responding to pollution in a pretty objective way? Or is it responding to community pressure where the community has enough economic status to press the issue?”

 

Globe-trotting ancient ‘sea-salamander’ fossils rediscovered from Australia’s dawn of the Age of Dinosaurs



Swedish Museum of Natural History

Ancient marine amphibians from Australia 

image: 

The ancient marine amphibians Erythrobatrachus (foreground) and Aphaneramma (background) swimming along the coast of what is now far norther Western Australia 250 million years ago. 

view more 

Credit: Pollyanna von Knorring (Swedish Museum of Natural History)





Around 250 million years ago, what is today scorching desert in remote northwestern Australia was the shore of a shallow bay bordering a vast prehistoric ocean. Fossils recovered from this region over 60 years ago, and almost forgotten in museum collections, have now shed new light on the earliest global radiations of land-living animals adapting to life in the sea.

The cataclysmic end-Permian mass extinction and extreme global warming prompted the emergence of modern marine ecosystems at the beginning of the Age of Dinosaurs (or Mesozoic era), some 252 million years ago. This landmark evolutionary event involved the earliest appearances of sea-going tetrapods (limbed vertebrates), including both amphibians and reptiles, which quickly rose to dominance as aquatic apex-predators. To date, the fossils of these earliest sea monsters have been largely documented from the northern hemisphere. By comparison, southern hemisphere records are geographically sparse and incompletely known.

A new study of 250 million-year-old fossil remains from the iconic Kimberly region of far northern Western Australia has uncovered evidence of a surprisingly diverse marine amphibian community with unexpectedly worldwide trans-oceanic links.

Finding lost fossils

Ancient marine amphibian fossils were initially discovered in Australia during scientific expeditions undertaken in the early 1960s and 1970s. The recovered specimens were distributed between museum collections in Australia and the U.S.A. Their resulting research was finally published in 1972, and identified a single species of marine amphibian, Erythrobatrachus noonkanbahensis, named from several skull fragments found weathering out of a rock outcrop on Noonkanbah cattle station east of the isolated Kimberly township of Derby.

Unfortunately, the original fossils of Erythrobatrachus were lost sometime during the intervening 50 years. This launched a search through international museum collections, which culminated with the rediscovery and reassessment of these enigmatic ancient marine amphibian remains in 2024.

Revealing cryptic communities and global radiations

Erythrobatrachus was a trematosaurid temnospondyl. Trematosaurids were superficially ‘crocodile-like’ relatives of modern salamanders and frogs that grew up to 2 m in length. Trematosaurids are important because their fossils occur in rock deposits laid down as sediment in coastal settings from less than 1 million years after the end-Permian mass extinction. They are, therefore, the geologically oldest currently recognisable group of Mesozoic marine tetrapods.

Surprisingly, however, detailed re-study showed that the skull fragments of Erythrobatrachus did not all belong to a single species. Rather, they represented at least two distinct types of trematosaurids – Erythrobatrachus and another species attributable to the well-known genus Aphaneramma.

Examination of the Erythrobatrachus skull using high-resolution 3D imaging suggests that it was about 40 cm long when complete, and came from a large-bodied, broader-headed top-predator. On the other hand, Aphaneramma was about the same size but had a long thin snout for catching small fish. Both of these trematosaurids swam through the water column, but would have hunted different prey in the same habitat.

Furthermore, while Erythrobatrachus in known exclusively from Australia, fossils of Aphaneramma have been reported from similar aged deposits on Svalbard in the Scandinavian Arctic, the Russian Far East, Pakistan and Madagascar. The Australian trematosaurid remains thus show that these earliest Mesozoic marine tetrapods not only radiated rapidly into a range of ecological niches, but also managed to disperse worldwide, perhaps following the coastal margins of interconnected supercontinents during the first two million years of the Age of Dinosaurs.

The paper is published in the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. The rediscovered fossils of Erythrobatrachus are currently being repatriated to Australia. Other ancient amphibian fossils from the Age of Dinosaurs are on public display at the Swedish Museum of Natural History.

Reference

Kear, B.P., Campione, N.E., Siversson, M., Bazzi, M., and Hart, L.J., 2026. Revision of the trematosaurid Erythrobatrachus noonkanbahensis confirms a cryptic marine temnospondyl community from the Lower Triassic of Western Australia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 45(4), e2601224. DOI:10.1080/02724634.2025.2601224