Sunday, September 28, 2025

'This should be impeachable': Trump buried over 'war-ravaged Portland' claim

SKIPPING CHICAGO CAUSE THEY SHOWED CHUTZPAH


Alexander Willis
September 27, 2025 
RAW STORY

President Donald Trump faced a wave of scrutiny Saturday after dubbing Portland, Oregon as “war-ravaged,” a characterization he cited to justify ordering a new military deployment to the city.


"Oh, okay, I get it now. YOU took a lot of Tylenol, didn’t you?” wrote X user “Nickie B,” a self-described critic of Trump and the MAGA movement, mocking Trump’s recent announcement linking, with disputed evidence, autism to Tylenol. “Now I get why we should stay away from it. Thanks for your attention to this matter!”

Trump has already deployed the military to patrol the streets of Washington, D.C., and has threatened on numerous occasions to do the same to Chicago, Illinois, and doing so in an ominous manner alongside an artificial intelligence-made image depicting the U.S. military invading the Illinois capital.

Trump’s announcement came in the wake of threats from Portland city officials threatening to evict federal immigration officials from a facility over alleged permit violations, which itself was followed by a sudden, unexplained “influx of federal agents” in the city.

Now that Trump has actually pulled the trigger and announced a military deployment to Portland, while also declaring the city to be “war-ravaged,” critics quickly pounced on the president’s rhetoric.

“Portland saw 17 homicides in the first half of 2025, a decline of 51%,” wrote Jay Bookman, journalist and author, in a post on X to his more than 20,000 followers.

“Yet Trump and the ‘secretary of war’ are sending the U.S. military into the city, authorizing American troops to use ‘Full Force’ against American civilians. What are we doing here, people?”

Some even argued that Trump’s characterization of Portland as “war-ravaged” was an impeachable offense, including Mehdi Hasan, journalist and former MSNBC host.

“If ever there was a time not to normalize Trump’s authoritarian fever dreams, this is it,” Hasan wrote to his more than 1.8 followers on X.

“This should be impeachable. ‘War ravaged’ Portland? He’s insane – and insanely power hungry. The script is set – call an imaginary group a terror group and then send in the troops.”


The city of Portland has violent crime rates higher than the national average, though the figures have declined dramatically in recent years.Homicides generally declined in Portland from 2000 to 2019 before spiking during the COVID-19 pandemic. Following the spike in homicides, rates began to fall again 
starting in 2023, then further dropping by 8% between 2023 and 2024, and further still during the first half of 2025, where homicides dropped by 51% when compared to the same time period the previous year.\\





Trump 'authorizing Full Force, if necessary' as military deploys to another US city

GENERAL BONESPURS DECLARES WAR ON PORTLAND

CHICAGO STOOD UP TO BONESPURS SO ITS OFF THE AGENDA 

Alexander Willis
September 27, 2025 
RAW STORY


President Donald Trump announced Saturday that he would be directing Department of Defense Secretary Pete Hegeseth to “provide all necessary troops” to protect “war-ravaged Portland,” Oregon, and in an effort to protect Immigration Customs and Enforcement facilities in the city.

“At the request of Secretary of Homeland Security [Secretary] Kristi Noem, I am directing Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, to provide all necessary Troops to protect War ravaged Portland, and any of our ICE Facilities under siege from attack by Antifa, and other domestic terrorists,” Trump wrote on his social media platform Truth Social Saturday. “I am also authorizing Full Force, if necessary. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”

Trump’s announcement comes shortly after Portland city officials threatened to evict ICE from its facility over alleged permit violations.

On Friday, Portland city officials held an emergency press conference after observing “a sudden influx of federal agents” in the city.

“We did not ask for them to come,” said Portland Mayor Keith Wilson during the press conference, according to a report from KOIN, a CBS affiliated station.


“If the federal government isn’t here to lend us a hand, take a hike…it’s just a big show. The president has sent agents here to create chaos and riots in Portland. [Trump] wants to induce a violent exchange. Let’s not grant him that wish…Say no to an authoritarian president.”





Portland police official worries Trump just made things worse: 'Will increase protesters'



David McAfee
September 27, 2025 
RAW STORY





People protest after U.S. President Donald Trump announced he would deploy the National Guard to the nation's capital and place D.C.'s Metropolitan Police Department under federal control, in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 11, 2025. 
REUTERS/Ken Cedeno


Donald Trump has announced his intentions to send troops to Portland, Oregon, and one local senior police official is worried the president will just be making matters worse.

Politico on Saturday published an article called Why Donald Trump is obsessed with Portland, in which the outlet attempts to explain the president's "fixation" on the city.

"Five years ago, rioters in Portland set fire to government buildings, epitomizing for many on the right the lawlessness and chaos that swirled around the George Floyd protests," according to the report. "President Donald Trump never forgot."


After elaborating on Trump's motives, Politico shares pieces of an interview with a senior police official in Oregon. The official was not allowed to speak about the issue, so was left with anonymity.

"But a senior police official at the Portland Police Department, who was granted anonymity because he was not authorized to talk about police operations, said sending in additional federal forces would escalate the situation," according to the report. "'It will increase the number of protesters,' he said. When asked what the PPD would do if that happens, he added: 'I truly don’t know.'"

The report goes on the shed some more light on the current ICE protests.

"The senior police official said the situation continues to escalate as federal officers are doxxed, threatened or physically hurt — and then in turn take a more adversarial approach to the late-night protesters," the report states.

“It is a political nightmare,” he said, according to Politico.

Read the article here.

‘An Egregious Abuse of Power’: Trump Orders Troops to Portland, Ore; OKs ‘Full Force’

“This unilateral action represents an abuse of executive authority, seeks to incite violence, and undermines the constitutional balance of power between the federal government and states,” Oregon lawmakers wrote.



People carrying banners march to protest over the death of George Floyd, an unarmed black man who died after being pinned down by a white police officer, on May 31, 2020 in Portland, Oregon.
(Photo by John Rudoff/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

Olivia Rosane
Sep 27, 2025
COMMON DREAMS


In his latest attempt to turn the US military on an American city, President Donald Trump said on Saturday that he was sending troops to Portland, Oregon and had authorized them to use “Full Force, if necessary.”

“At the request of Secretary of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, I am directing Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, to provide all necessary Troops to protect War ravaged Portland, and any of our ICE Facilities under siege from attack by Antifa, and other domestic terrorists,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.



‘No Trump! No Troops!’ Thousands March in Chicago as President Threatens ‘War’



DC Sues Over Trump Troop Deployment as National Guard Members Say They’re Being Used as ‘Toy Soldiers’

Trump’s announcement follows his deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles and Washington, DC, as well as his threats to send the military to Chicago and Memphis. These deployments have been widely condemned and legally challenged as a massive overreach of executive authority.

Portland and Oregon leaders were no less vehement in their opposition to Trump’s order for their city.

“Trump is plunging further into authoritarianism every single day.”


“President Trump has directed ‘all necessary Troops’ to Portland, Oregon. The number of necessary troops is zero, in Portland and any other American city,” Portland Mayor Keith Wilson said in a statement on Saturday. “Our nation has a long memory for acts of oppression, and the president will not find lawlessness or violence here unless he plans to perpetrate it.”

Democratic Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek said that she had not been informed ahead of time of any reason for the deployment of federal troops.

“In my conversations directly with President Trump and Secretary Noem, I have been abundantly clear that Portland and the State of Oregon believe in the rule of law and can manage our own local public safety needs,” she wrote on social media. “There is no insurrection. There is no threat to national security.”

Rep. Maxine Dexter (D-Ore.) said in a statement: “The President of the United States is directing his self-proclaimed ‘Secretary of War’ to unleash militarized federal forces in an American city he disagrees with. This is an egregious abuse of power and a betrayal of our most basic American values.”

“Authoritarians rely on fear to divide us,” she continued. “Portland will not give them that. We will not be intimidated. We have prepared for this moment since Trump first took office, and we will meet it with every tool available to us: litigation, legislation, and the power of peaceful public pressure.”

Dexter also posted a photograph of a tranquil park on social media, mocking the idea that Portland was a war zone.



Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) adopted a similar strategy, posting videos of downtown Portland and of an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility that has been the site of protests Trump has characterized as out-of-control.



Dexter and Wyden were among the seven members of Oregon’s congressional delegation who sent a letter to Trump, Noem, and Hegseth on Saturday urging them to reconsider.

“Portland is a vibrant and peaceful city, and does not require any deployment of federal troops or additional federal agents to keep our community safe,” the lawmakers wrote. “This unilateral action represents an abuse of executive authority, seeks to incite violence, and undermines the constitutional balance of power between the federal government and states. We urge you to rescind this decision, and withdraw any military personnel and federal agents you have recently sought to deploy.”

As of Saturday, Oregon National Guard spokesperson Lt. Col. Stephen Bomar told The Associated Press in an email that “no official requests have been received at this time.” However, Oregon officials noted an uptick in the presence of federal agents and armored vehicles in Portland on Friday.

In a press conference Friday evening, Mayor Wilson suggested that the deployment was a “distraction” from the looming GOP-driven government shutdown.

“Imagine if the federal government sent instead 100 teachers or 100 engineers or 100 addiction specialists,” Wilson said.

Earlier in the week, Trump also smeered Portland protesters as “professional agitators and anarchists,” according to the Portland Tribune.

“We’re going to get out there and we’re going to do a pretty big number on those people in Portland,” Trump said.

The federal deployment threatens to reopen wounds from 2020, when Portland was the site of massive protests sparked by the police killing of George Floyd and the first Trump administration sent federal and border agents to the city.

As the Oregon lawmakers wrote:
Portland residents experienced the consequences of an unnecessary and outrageous federal deployment five years ago. In summer of 2020, the White House unleashed federal agents on Portland like an occupying army, complete with military-grade equipment and violent tactics that were utterly unacceptable on American soil. A federal agent shot a peaceful protester in the head with a crowd-control munition, sending the man to the hospital with a fractured skull. Federal agents were captured on video jumping out of unmarked vans and grabbing people off the streets without explanation. A county commissioner was tear gassed along with other non-violent protestors. A Navy veteran was filmed being beaten by federal agents after he questioned them about their actions. These examples, and many more that occurred in Portland, demonstrate that the federal agents who were parachuted into Portland incited violence and trampled over the constitutional rights of Americans. There is no question that another deployment by your administration will result in similar abuses.

However, the risks of abuses are perhaps even higher as the second Trump administration has designated “antifa,” which is not an actual, coherent group, as a domestic terrorist organization, a dubious legal move that experts warn is an attempt to restrict the First Amendment rights of leftists and others critical of the administration.

“If ever there was a time not to normalize Trump’s authoritarian fever dreams, this is it,” said journalist Mehdi Hasan on social media. “This should be impeachable. ‘War ravaged’ Portland? He’s insane—& insanely power hungry. The script is set—call an imaginary group a terror group and then send in the troops.”

Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) urged his constituents not to give Trump the confrontation he is clearly seeking.

“Trump is sending troops to Portland with the goal of ‘doing a number’ on the city. We know what this means. He wants to stoke fear and chaos and trigger violent interactions and riots to justify expanded authoritarian control,” he said in a video posted on social media. “Let’s not take the bait! Portland is peaceful and strong and we will take care of each other.



Other advocates and lawmakers also took issue with Trump’s characterization of Portland.

Human Rights lawyer Qasim Rashid pointed out that Portland had actually experienced the most dramatic drop in homicides among all US cities during the first half of 2025.


Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said the description of Portland as “war ravaged” was “delusional and dangerous.”

“Sending troops into American cities doesn’t make our communities safer—it just stokes fear and stirs up chaos,” she wrote on social media. “Trump is plunging further into authoritarianism every single day.”

Civil rights lawyer and author Alec Karakatsanis said that the mainstream media needed to reflect on how its reporting had enabled Trump’s false narrative about Portland.

“This kind of outrageous misinformation would not be possible without the culture of fear spread for years by the mainstream media,” Karakatsanis wrote on social media. “He is playing on the prodigious ignorance and irrational fear cultivated by the way the news media distorts our sense of safety.”

“Portland, needless to say, is nothing remotely like what Trump describes,” he continued. “But the mass media has created an entirely delusional public perception of what threats we face and from whom.”
Rio-Paris 2009 crash: appeal trial against Air France and Airbus begins

An appeals trial of Air France and Airbus opened Monday over the 2009 crash of Rio-Paris flight AF447 that killed 228 people. The Airbus A330 plunged into the Atlantic after pilots lost control, in the French carrier’s worst disaster. Victims included 72 French nationals and 58 Brazilians.


Issued on: 29/09/2025 - 
By: FRANCE 24


Alain Bouillard, investigator-in-charge of flight Air France 447 safety investigation from French agency Bureau of Enquiry speaks on the AF447 Rio-Paris plane flight black boxes on May 12, 2011. © MEHDI FEDOUACH, AFP

An appeals trial of Air France and Airbus opens Monday over the 2009 crash of a Rio-Paris flight that killed 228 people, the worst disaster in the French flag carrier's history.

On June 1, 2009, Air France flight AF447 from Rio de Janeiro to Paris was cruising over the Atlantic when the pilots lost control of the aircraft and plunged into the ocean.

There were no survivors among the 216 passengers and 12 crew on board the Airbus-built A330 aircraft, who included 72 French nationals and 58 Brazilians.

Both the airline and aircraft maker were acquitted of involuntary manslaughter two years ago when a court found that the companies had made mistakes but could not be proven to have caused the crash.

The verdict was a blow to the victims' families, who said they were outraged by the court's decision to clear the companies of the charges.

Airbus, Air France acquitted of manslaughter charges in trial over 2009 Rio-Paris crash

Although the prosecution in the 2023 trial had themselves asked for the charges to be dropped, it subsequently lodged the appeal to allow "the full potential of the legal appeals procedure" to play out.

If convicted, the two companies may face a fine of 225,000 euros ($264,000) as well as significant reputational damage.

The hearings in the first trial centred on the role of defective "pitot tubes", which are used to measure flight speed.

The court heard how a malfunction with the tubes, which became blocked with ice crystals during a mid-Atlantic storm, caused alarms to sound in the plane's cockpit and the autopilot system to switch off.

Technical experts highlighted how, after the instrument failed, the pilots put the plane into a climb that caused the aircraft to stall and then crash into the ocean.

Air France and Airbus blamed pilot error as the main cause, denying any criminal liability.

French prosecutors will not seek Airbus, Air France convictions over 2009 Rio-Paris crash

But lawyers for the families argued both companies were aware of the pitot tube problem before the crash, and that the pilots were not trained to deal with such a high-altitude emergency.

The court said Airbus committed "four acts of imprudence or negligence", including not replacing certain models of the pitot tubes that seemed to freeze more often on its A330-A340 fleet, and "withholding information" from flight operators.

It said Air France had committed two "acts of imprudence" in the way it disseminated an information note on the faulty tubes to its pilots.

But the court also found there was not a strong enough causal link between these failings and the accident to show an offence had been committed.

Daniele Lamy, president of the association representing the victims, said she and others were "disgusted" by the decision, with the families of Brazilian victims also highly critical of the French acquittal.

It took nearly two years after the crash to recover the "black box" flight recorders, which were found almost 4,000 metres (13,000 feet) below sea level.

The appeals trial is set to close on November 27.

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)
EU climate watchdog urges Europe to step up environmental protections

Europe remains a leader in tackling climate change but must step up efforts to protect the environment and adapt to warming, the EU’s environment agency warned on Monday. The warning follows member states’ failure at a UN summit to agree a 2035 emissions-cutting plan amid internal divisions.

Issued on: 29/09/2025 
By: FRANCE 24

The sun rises by the Eiffel Tower and the Sacre Coeur Basilica ontop of the Montmartre hill in Paris on July 1, 2025. © Thibaud Moritz, AFP

Europe is a world leader in the fight against climate change but must do more to protect its environment and improve its resilience against global warming, the European Union's environment agency warned on Monday.

"Significant progress has been made in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution, but the overall state of Europe's environment is not good," the European Environment Agency (EEA) said in a statement as it presented its latest report on the issue.

The climate assessment comes after EU member states at a UN climate summit last week were unable to present a formal 2035 plan to further slash greenhouse gases due to disagreements among its 27 member states.

The bloc is also unable to agree on an ambitious proposal from the European Commission to reduce emissions by 90 percent by 2040 from 1990 levels.


EU greenhouse gas emissions have dropped by 37 percent since 1990, well ahead of other major polluters like China and the United States, thanks to the reduced use of fossil fuels and the doubling of renewable energy since 2005.

But EU countries must "step up implementation of policies and longer-term sustainability-enabling actions already agreed to under the European Green Deal", which was adopted during the European Commission's previous mandate, the EEA said.

The continent's nature "continues to face degradation, overexploitation and biodiversity loss", noted the EEA, which compiled data from 38 countries across the continent for its report.

Water in particular is an increasingly scarce resource, and land is over-exploited.

Some 81 percent of protected habitats are in poor or bad condition, 60 to 70 percent of soils are degraded, and 62 percent of water bodies are not in good ecological condition, the report said.

Climate change exacerbates water scarcity, but the EEA said it was possible to save up to 40 percent of water in agriculture, water supply and energy through better governance, technological innovation, water reuse and public awareness.

The impacts of climate change represent a growing challenge, it stressed.


Many of the effects are indirect, causing damage to infrastructure and ecosystems or leading to price increases, among other things.

Most buildings in Europe were not designed to withstand heat, the EEA said, noting that 19 percent of Europeans are not able to maintain a comfortable temperature in their homes.

The frequency of extreme heatwaves is increasing, yet only 21 of the EEA's 38 member countries have health action plans for heatwaves, the agency noted.
Financial toll rising

In general, extreme weather and climate events -- such as heatwaves, floods, landslides and wildfires -- have caused over 240,000 deaths between 1980 and 2023 in the 27 EU countries.

The financial toll of these events continues to mount.

Average annual economic losses were 2.5 times higher between 2020 and 2023 than during the 2010-2019 period.

In 2023, the financial toll of floods in Slovenia amounted to 16 percent of the country's GDP.

DOWN TO EARTH © FRANCE 24
07:37


The agency called on Europe to adapt its societies and economy.

"Human survival depends on high quality nature, particularly when it comes to adaptation to climate change," Catherine Ganzleben, head of the EEA's Sustainable and Fair Transitions unit, told reporters at a briefing.

"So, sustainability is not a choice, it's a question of when we do it. Do we do it in the short term and start now, or do we park it, in which case it's going to be harder and the costs of inaction will be higher?," she added.

Preventing pollution reduces the number of deaths and illnesses and their harmful consequences.

When it comes to air pollution, the number of deaths linked to fine particulate matter exposure has significantly decreased, dropping by 45 percent between 2005 and 2022.

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)
Moldova’s pro-EU party wins pivotal election mired in claims of Russian meddling

Moldova's ruling PAS party pulled comfortably ahead of its Russian-leaning rivals in a high-stakes parliamentary election as final results trickled in on Monday, leaving the EU candidate country that borders Ukraine on a path towards European integration. The tense vote was marked by a string of incidents and overshadowed by accusations of Russian interference.


Issued on: 29/09/2025 - 00:28
By: FRANCE 24


A supporter of the pro-EU Party of Action and Solidarity (PAS) draped in the Moldovan flag smiles as he checks partial results on a phone in Chisinau on September 28, 2025. © Vadim Ghirda, AP
05:06



Moldova's ruling pro-EU party on Sunday topped parliamentary elections, according to almost complete results for a vote overshadowed by accusations of Russian interference in the ex-Soviet country.

The small European Union candidate nation, which borders Ukraine and has a pro-Russia breakaway region, has long been divided over whether to move closer with Brussels or maintain Soviet-era relations with Moscow.

Sunday's elections were seen as crucial for the country to maintain its push towards EU integration, launched after Moscow's 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

© France 24
02:46


With 95 percent of the votes counted early Monday, the Party of Action and Solidarity (PAS), in power since 2021, stood at 48.3 percent, well ahead of the runner-up pro-Russian Patriotic Bloc at 25.5 percent.

PAS – whose leaders did not address waiting reporters late Sunday – gained 52.8 percent in 2021.

"Statistically speaking PAS has guaranteed a fragile majority," analyst Andrei Curararu of the Chisinau-based think tank WatchDog.md told AFP.

But he warned that "the danger is not surpassed, as a functional government is difficult to form."

Curararu added: "The Kremlin has bankrolled too big of an operation to stand down and could resort to protests, bribing PAS MPs and other tactics to disrupt forming a stable pro-European government."
Call for protests

The ballot was overshadowed by fears of vote buying and unrest, as well as "an unprecedented campaign of disinformation" from Russia, according to the EU.

Moscow has denied the allegations.

Moldovan citizens queue to vote in the parliamentary elections at the country's embassy in Moscow REUTERS - Ramil Sitdikov
16:58



Igor Dodon, a former president and one of the leaders of the Patriotic Bloc, called on people to "peacefully protest" on Monday, accusing PAS of stealing the vote.

"If during the night there are falsifications, tomorrow we won't recognise (the result of) the parliamentary elections... and we will ask for elections to be repeated," he said late Sunday outside the electoral commission, where he went with some supporters.

Earlier Sunday, voter Natalia Sandu said the election was critical becasue the nation was "at a crossroads".

"Our hope, and our expectation, is that we will stay on the European path," the 34-year-old homemaker told AFP.

"The alternative is unthinkable, I refuse to even imagine sliding back into the past," she added.


Turnout stood at around 52 percent, similar to that of the last parliamentary elections in 2021.

Voters in the country of 2.4 million – one of Europe's poorest – have expressed frustration over economic hardship, as well as scepticism over the drive to join the EU.

"I want higher wages and pensions.... I want things to continue as they were during the Russian times," Vasile, a 51-year-old locksmith and welder, who only gave his first name, told AFP at a polling station in Chisinau.

Some 20 political parties and independent candidates were running for the 101 parliamentary seats.

'Massive interference'

After casting her vote, pro-EU President Maia Sandu of PAS warned of a "massive interference of Russia".

Moldova's cybersecurity service said Sunday it had detected several attempted attacks on the electoral infrastructure, which were "neutralised in real time... without affecting the availability or integrity of electoral services".


Election day was marked by a string of incidents, ranging from bomb threats at multiple polling stations abroad to voters photographing their ballots and some being illegally transported to polling stations. Police also detained three people suspected of plotting to cause unrest after the vote

In the breakaway region of Transnistria, authorities, in turn, accused Chisinau of "numerous and blatant" attempts to limit the vote of Moldovans living in the separatist territory by reducing the number of polling stations and other tactics.

The government has accused the Kremlin of spending hundreds of millions in "dirty money" to interfere in the campaign.

In the lead-up to the vote, prosecutors carried out hundreds of searches related to what the government said was "electoral corruption" and "destabilisation attempts", with dozens arrested.

(FRANCE 24 with AP)

Divided by the Dniester: Transnistria casts a shadow over Moldova’s EU ambitions


The separatist region of Transnistria has long been the thorn in the side of Moldova's pursuit of European Union membership – a fact thrown into sharp relief as parliamentary elections loom.


Issued on: 26/09/2025 - RFI

A woman walks past the Operational Group of Russian Forces headquarters in Tiraspol, the capital of the breakaway region of Transnistria in Moldova, 1 November, 2021. AP - Dmitri Lovetsky

By: Jan van der Made


At the 28 September elections in Moldova, most people in the breakaway region of Transnistria won’t vote.

"There are no polling stations. They consider themselves independent,” says Nico Lamminparras, an expert in the politics of Transnistria based in Helsinki.

Transnistrians who want to vote can do so, if they cross the artificial border formed by the Dniester river into Moldova proper, where the government will open several polling stations.

The inhabitants of Transnistria are predominantly pro-Russian and "local authorities continue to promote an Eastern [pro-Russian] orientation," Lamminparras told RFI.

The region held its own referendum in 2006, opting to “go back home, to Russia,” he added – a move that underlined the enclave's metaphorical, if not geographical, distance from Moldova and the European Union.

Moldova will keep pro-EU course despite Russian threat, Popescu tells RFI

It is unclear how many Transnistrians will turn out to vote later this month.

According to Chisinau-based Regional Trend Analytics, a socio-economic watchdog, during last year's presidential elections and referendum some 30 polling stations were opened but only a few people turned up because of false reports of mines and blocking of bridges.
Soviet era

Transnistria has historically been multi-ethnic, its population shaped by waves of migration during the Soviet era, with substantial Russian and Ukrainian communities.

Joseph Stalin’s annexation of Bessarabia from Romania in 1940 merged it with Russian-speaking Transnistria to form the Moldovan Soviet Socialist Republic.

Following the Soviet collapse, as Moldova drifted towards nationalism and a potential union with Romania, people in Transnistria, wary of losing Russian cultural ties, declared independence in 1990.

Armed conflict, resulting in some 1,000 dead, broke out in 1992, with the 14th Guards Combined Arms Army branch of the Russian Army intervening to support the separatists.

The resulting ceasefire cemented Transnistria’s de facto independence, although this is not recognised internationally and a “frozen conflict” persists to this day.

Moldova President warns European Parliament about Russia threat


Location of Transnistria at the eastern border of Moldova. © Wikimedia Commons

Different model

Transnistria is not the only Moldovan region that wants to chart its own course.

Still under Moldovan control, southern Gagauzia offers a different model. The enclave is home to the Gagauz, a Turkic Orthodox Christian people.

It also declared independence in the early 1990s. But rather than secede, Gagauzia accepted autonomy within Moldova in 1995, obtaining constitutional guarantees and substantial cultural self-determination.

Russian remains the dominant language, and Gagauzia continues to harbour pro-Russian sentiments, occasionally threatening to secede if Moldova were to change its status of autonomy.

Yet unlike Transnistria, Gagauzia participates in Moldovan elections and retains economic links to the central government, making its autonomy more functional and less destabilising.

Macron pledges France's 'determined support' for Moldova joining EU


EU accession


The Transnistrian question casts a long shadow over Moldova’s EU accession process.

“The pro-Europeans will have a clear majority,” predicts Laminparras – albeit a declining one, meaning that "Moldovan policy will keep on as it is".

For Transnistria, he says, a possible Moldovan accession could prove disastrous.

"The EU process implies tariffs for the Transnistrian products passing the boundary,” which he added would deepen the economic gulf between the two banks of the Dniester.

Others, however, are more optimistic.

"It's clear that it's much better to join the European Union without a separatist conflict,” Nicu Popescu, Moldova's former deputy prime minister and foreign minister, who is running in the parliamentary elections on the list of the pro-European Action and Solidarity Party, told RFI. “The EU itself was founded on a divided state – West Germany."

According to Popescu, in the case of Moldova "the hope is that by joining the EU, reintegration of the country will in fact be made easier and more sustainable".

EU integration versus Russian influence: Moldova’s future on the line

Moldovans are heading to the polls on Sunday – in what is widely seen as the most important election since the country gained independence – facing a political crossroads with implications for its European future, regional security and domestic stability.



Issued on: 28/09/2025 - 

A demonstration of the Socialist-Communist block in Chisinau, Moldova, 25 September.
 © RFI/Jan van der Made

By:Jan van der MadeFollow
Advertising

At stake are all 101 seats in the unicameral parliament, which are elected via proportional representation.

The significance of Sunday's vote transcends national boundaries. Moldova’s next government will determine whether the country maintains its accelerated path toward European Union membership, or pivots back toward deeper ties with Moscow.

The election is set against a backdrop of Russia’s ongoing war in neighbouring Ukraine, and intense international interest in Moldova’s democratic resilience.

Russian disinformation and Moldova's media landscape

Who are the main contenders?


The pro-European Party of Action and Solidarity (PAS), led by President Maia Sandu, seeks to consolidate Moldova’s European trajectory. PAS entered this race as the incumbent majority, campaigning on promises of anti-corruption and EU integration.
Maia Sandu speaks at the first Moldova-EU summit in Chisinau on 4 July. 
REUTERS - Vladislav Culiomza

Facing off against the PAS are two pro-Russian alliances – the Patriotic Electoral Bloc (BEP) and the Alternativa Bloc.

BEP consists of former presidents Igor Dodon and Vladimir Voronin. But in the period leading up to the elections, their forces were weakened after the Central Electoral Commission banned some of the participants.

On Friday the commission excluded the pro-Russian party Greater Moldova from the election citing suspected illegal financing and foreign funding. Authorities suspect the party tried to influence voters with money and may be linked to the previously banned party led by exiled businessman Ilan Shor.

Greater Moldova’s leader, Victoria Furtuna, described the decision as biased and intends to appeal.

Last week the commission banned another pro-Russian party, Heart of Moldova, part of the pro-Russian Patriotic bloc, from participating in the bloc, amid similar concerns.

Vladimir Putin and then-Moldovan President Igor Dodon shake hands during a meeting at the Kremlin in March 2017. 
AP - Mikhail Klimentyev


The opposition forces advocate for Moldova’s neutrality and a sovereign course, warning that closer EU alignment would erode the country’s independence and social fabric.


Demonstrators with the Socialist/Communist block in central Chisinau, two days before the general election, on 25 September, 2025. © RFI/Jan van der Made

The Alternativa Bloc, led by Chisinau mayor Ion Ceban, former Prosecutor General Alexandru Stoianoglo, former prime minister Ion Chicu and strategist Mark Tkaciuc, positions itself as a “neither West nor Russia” coalition.

Its pragmatism has drawn voters tired of ideological confrontation, although its image took a hit when Ceban was denied entry to Romania in July over security concerns – a ban which extends to the entire Schengen visa-free travel area, Romania's foreign ministry said.

A couple passes an election poster for the 'Alternative' block, 25 September. 
© RFI/Jan van der Made

Russian influence


Moscow’s campaign to prevent a pro-EU majority has been well documented, and multi-faceted.

Intelligence leaks and investigative reports such as those by the Bulgaria-based Disinformation observatory, reveal strategies ranging from funding pro-Russian parties, deploying social media disinformation, orchestrating protests and targeting the Moldovan diaspora with false narratives and cash inducements.

Last week, Moldovan authorities detained 74 individuals accused of involvement in a Moscow-driven plot to destabilise the elections.

French support, Russian meddling and the fight for Europe’s frontier in Moldova

For the EU, Moldova’s election is a litmus test for the bloc's ability to withstand Moscow’s interference campaigns, and anchor reform and stability at its eastern border.

Brussels and several member state leaders have demonstrated support for Moldova’s sovereignty, with Emmanuel Macron, Friedrich Merz and Donald Tusk paying recent visits.

The EU has imposed targeted sanctions on individuals and groups suspected of fuelling Russian interference, while stepping up assistance for media pluralism, electoral transparency and civil society organisations.

BALKAN BLOG: The battle for Moldova

BALKAN BLOG: The battle for Moldova
/ bne IntelliNews
By Iulian Ernst in Bucharest September 28, 2025

After Moldova was nearly derailed from its EU accession path in last year’s presidential election, the authorities have taken controversial steps to prevent this happening again ahead of the September 28 general election. 

In recent months, the Moldovan authorities have unveiled illegal financing schemes to support pro-Russian parties, and criminal organisations channelling money to buy votes and organise anti-government protests. They also exposed sophisticated online campaigns involving bot farms and influencers linked to Russia. The authorities in Chisinau responded actively, including with strategies that would, under normal circumstances, be considered on the verge of unconstitutional. 

This began with the dissolution of the Șor Party led by fugitive oligarch Ilan Shor in June 2023 on grounds that were seen as flimsy at the time. Now, Shor’s role in the country’s elections is better documented. Sentenced in Moldova to 15 years of prison for financial fraud, he is openly organising and financing the pro-Russian opposition in Moldova, while also helping Russian authorities to bypass Western sanctions through cryptocurrency arrangements, as announced by the US Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) earlier this year.

On September 26, two opposition parties, including Inima Moldovei (Heart of Moldova) led by former governor of Gagauzia Irina Vlah, one of the three parties in the main opposition coalition, were banned from running in the election just two days before the vote.

Like former president Igor Dodon, Vlah has regularly met Russian President Vladimir Putin and argued for equal collaboration with both the EU and Russia. Her party had not yet been found guilty of illegal financing activities. However, the Central Electoral Commission (CEC) decided to suspend the party’s activity for 12 months on “reasonable suspicions” of illegal financing, at the request of the Ministry of Justice. The decision can be appealed, but its effects were enforced before the appeal, starting with the September 28 election.

The new party led by former prosecutor Victoria Furtună was also suspended for 12 months, allegedly for connections with Shor.

In another controversial previous move, the Moldovan authorities restricted the civil rights of opposition leaders, including Vlah, primarily by freezing their bank accounts. These measures were based not on court rulings but on sanctions imposed by Western countries for “active support of Russia”. The Constitutional Court allowed the intelligence services to impose such civil rights restrictions based solely on political sanctions set by foreign states.

Also on September 26, the CEC decided to relocate five voting stations initially designated for voters in Transnistria. Originally announced to be located within the separatist region, the stations were moved to territory controlled by the constitutional authorities only two days before the ballot.

Opposition parties claimed that construction works on bridges across the Dniester River, separating the two sides of the country, had been initiated by the authorities deliberately before the elections in order to prevent pro-Russian voters from reaching polling stations.

On election day, the authorities reported the organised transport of Transnistrians to polling stations across the Dniester as a breach of electoral procedures.

This year, the number of voting stations in Russia, home to a significant part of the Moldovan diaspora, has been severely restricted. Moldovans in areas far from Moscow were transported to Belarus to vote in Minsk, reportedly organised by Șor. Moldovan authorities also reported this operation as a violation of electoral regulations.

In another unusual move, President Maia Sandu became actively involved in supporting the Party of Action and Solidarity (PAS), which she founded, despite constitutional provisions.

With strong support from EU institutions, she campaigned for the country’s EU accession while criticising other pro-EU parties as covert Russian vehicles. A side effect of this strategy was the lack of political allies for the PAS, which will have to secure the majority of votes in order to remain in office. The authorities’ limited engagement with the Russian-speaking population during the EU accession process was evident and created space for pro-Russian propaganda.

Not only President Sandu, but also the public administration, has engaged in supporting the pro-EU parties.

In its first monitoring report on the September 28 parliamentary election, civil society organisation Promo-LEX stated that abuse of administrative resources is a “systemic phenomenon”, tolerated and still practised despite the existing legal framework.

“Without real sanctions, legislative clarifications, and a genuine delimitation between party and state, this type of abuse risks becoming normal,” warned Promo-LEX experts.

Conditions in Moldova have been far from normal since Russia invaded Ukraine, and especially in recent weeks.

This follows a turbulent period in Moldovan politics since Russia annexed Crimea in 2014. Shortly afterwards, it was revealed that pro-EU politicians were involved in the $1bn bank fraud scandal that bankrupted the country’s three largest banks, adding some 8% of GDP to public debt and complicating EU accession efforts.

The parliamentary election of November-December 2023 and the presidential election and EU accession referendum in September 2024 marked a gradual increase in activity by pro-Russian politicians operating in coordination with the Kremlin.

The pro-EU authorities in office since 2021, headed by Sandu, have been caught between economic pressures generated by the war in Ukraine and Russia’s energy leverage on one hand, and resistance to reform from the judiciary on the other. The latter has prevented firm prosecution of corruption, including what Sandu has described as electoral corruption.

Moldova’s proactive response must be viewed in the context of the hybrid war waged by Russia in cooperation with a significant part of the local population. Court rulings should be based on the evidence available at the time, but the complexity of digital tools poses serious challenges in addressing electoral criminality.

The elections in Moldova, carried out under hybrid attacks from the Russian Federation, illustrate the need for a revised set of best electoral practices in light of new financial, media and communication instruments. Ballot reruns, as seen in Romania, or reactive policies may provide short-term fixes, but they remain debatable and insufficient for ensuring genuine elections in which the rights of all candidates are respected.

Telegram owner Durov says French, Moldovan governments asked him to block anti-government accounts ahead of elections

Telegram owner Durov says French, Moldovan governments asked him to block anti-government accounts ahead of elections
Tech billionaire Pavel Durov says the French intelligence services and Moldovan asked him to block anti-govrenment channels ahead of this weekend's elections in a politically motivated attempt to manipulate social media. / bne IntelliNews
By Ben Aris in Berlin September 28, 2025

The owner of the Telegram messaging service Pavel Durov said that the French intelligence approached him earlier this year and asked him to block anti-government channels in the run up to this weekend's elections on two occasions in a post on Telegram on September 27.

“About a year ago, while I was stuck in Paris, the French intelligence services reached out to me through an intermediary, asking me to help the Moldovan government censor certain Telegram channels ahead of the presidential elections in Moldova,” Durov said.

Tech billionaire Elon Musk reposted the message with the brief comment: “Wow.”

The founder of Telegram encrypted messenger service now lives in self-imposed exile and was arrested in August last year as he got off his private jet in France.

Durov holds a dual French citizenship since 2021 was held for several days on child pornography and other cybersecurity charges by the French authorities. The officials said that Durov has failed to monitor his service which is widely used by criminals to conduct business including selling illicit pornography, although the charges were later dropped.

“After reviewing the channels flagged by French (and Moldovan) authorities, we identified a few that clearly violated our rules and removed them. The intermediary then informed me that, in exchange for this cooperation, French intelligence would “say good things” about me to the judge who had ordered my arrest in August last year,” Durov said in his post.

“This was unacceptable on several levels. If the agency did in fact approach the judge — it constituted an attempt to interfere in the judicial process. If it did not, and merely claimed to have done so, then it was exploiting my legal situation in France to influence political developments in Eastern Europe — a pattern we have also observed in Romania,” Durov added.

Telegram is one of the favourite messaging services and has played a key role in Belarus’ mass anti-government protests in 2020 and has been a thorn in the side of the Russian authorities, who tried to ban th service in 2008, but failed.

This weekend's elections are proving controversial and have led to accusations of an attempt to manipulate the outcome for the pro-Europe Sandu). The authorities banned two of the main opposition parties only 48 hours before the vote. Voting in the breakaway Moldovan region of Transnistria, which is under Russian occupation, has been cancelled. No polling stations have been provided for Moldovans living in Russia, according to reports, while extra stations for Moldovans living in the EU have been provided.

Durov said he was approached a second time by the French intelligence service with a more explicit politically motivated request to close down anti-government channels, which he refused to do.

“Shortly thereafter, the Telegram team received a second list of so-called “problematic” Moldovan channels. Unlike the first, nearly all of these channels were legitimate and fully compliant with our rules. Their only commonality was that they voiced political positions disliked by the French and Moldovan governments,” Durov wrote. “We refused to act on this request.”

Durov has taken a radical non-interference stance and says that it will not censor the content on its service and flatly refuses to cooperate with governments. However, after his arrest in France, investigations have found that he has on occasion cooperated with the Federal Security Service (FSB), the Russian security service.

“Telegram is committed to freedom of speech and will not remove content for political reasons. I will continue to expose every attempt to pressure Telegram into censoring our platform. Stay tuned,” Durov posted.