Saturday, October 15, 2022

FAUX OUTRAGE ON THE RIGHT

Days of Our Lives features first threesome scene since moving from broadcast TV

by Jenny Goldsberry, Social Media Producer |
October 13, 2022 

The soap opera Days of Our Lives aired its first threesome scene within two weeks of leaving broadcast television.

The scene featured actress Lindsay Arnold, who plays a bisexual character, Raven Bowen, who plays a sexually fluid character, and Robert Scott Wilson. Arnold and Bowen portray a couple on the show that participated in a consensual threesome on the Oct. 6 episode.

Days of Our Lives began exclusively streaming on Peacock on Sept. 12. NBC, which used to broadcast the show on its cable channel, now airs an hourlong news program in that time slot, according to NBC News Daily. Previous episodes from seasons NBC originally aired on cable will be available for one year from the date they aired.


All photos are from AP

Section 506 of the 1996 Cable Act allows cable operators to refuse to transmit any public access or leased access program that contains obscenity, indecency, or nudity, according to the Federal Communications Commission. As viewers must subscribe to Peacock for $4.99 a month in order to view Days of Our Lives, there is no such rule for content that the streaming service has to follow.

The week before its move to Peacock, airings of Days of Our Lives had 1.679 million viewers, which was an increase of 93,000 viewers week to week and a 20,000 increase compared to the same week last year. It was the fourth most popular soap opera at the time.

The soap opera began airing on the network in 1965 and has won 58 Daytime Emmy awards since then as the longest-running series on NBC. Arnold was recently nominated for outstanding younger performer in a drama series at the Emmys.
Republicans have gained ground with Latinos since 2018, and many believe stolen election lies, poll finds

Nearly two of five Latinos who responded said they believe debunked claims that there was cheating and election fraud in 2020 and that Trump won.

Latino Trump supporters at Ace Speedway in Elon, N.C., on Sept. 19, 2020.
Jason Armond / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images file


Oct. 13, 2022, 
By Suzanne Gamboa

Republicans have gained ground with Latino voters since the 2018 “blue wave” midterm cycle, even though Hispanic voters still favor Democrats, a Latino tracking poll shows.

Support for Republicans in congressional races is up 10 percentage points over 2018, to 30%, according to the poll by the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (NALEO) Educational Fund.

Feelings among Latinos that the Republican Party is hostile to them have waned, with 27% of those Latinos polled saying the GOP is hostile, compared to 37% in 2018.

“Five weeks into our tracking poll, it’s becoming clear that Republicans have gained significant ground with Latino voters since the last midterm cycle,” Arturo Vargas, NALEO’s executive director said in a statement.

The poll found that 38% of Latinos believe it’s true or mostly true that there was cheating and election fraud in 2020 and that Trump was the election’s true winner. But 40 percent said it was mostly false or more false than true. Trump lost the election, and there’s been no evidence of widespread voter fraud.

This election, an estimated 34.5 million Latinos are eligible to vote — meaning they will be 18 or older on Election Day and are U.S. citizens, according to a report from Pew Research Center released this week. Latino eligible voters' numbers have jumped by 4.7 million since 2018 and are 62 percent of the total growth in U.S. eligible voters since the last midterms, Pew reported.

That makes Latinos the fastest growing racial and ethnic group in the U.S. electorate since the last midterm elections, although Black voters have higher turnout rates than Latinos and Asians. Asians were the fastest growing group of eligible voters over the past two decades, but their growth leveled off some in 2018, Pew reported.

Former President Donald Trump expanded Republicans' share of Latino voters in 2020, despite beliefs that policies considered anti-Latino such as separating children from their parents at the border and a nearly 19 percent unemployment rate among Latinos during his last year in office and in the midst of the pandemic would turn Latinos off. However, Joe Biden won the majority of Latino voters in the 2020 presidential election.
More support for GOP — while embracing Democratic positions

Even with the increased support for Republicans in congressional races, Latinos tended to support Democratic policy positions, such as President Joe Biden’s cancellation of $20,000 in student debt for some Americans: 75% support it versus 25% who are opposed. On guns, 74% support banning assault rifles, compared to 26% who do not. The poll also found that 88% support allowing Medicare to negotiate lower prices on prescription drugs, and 12 percent oppose.

The poll also found that Latinos were more likely to say they would vote after being told about some of the Democrats’ achievements and issues such as the Inflation Reduction Act, the cancellation of student debt and the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade. But a quarter to about 28 percent on each issue said the information had no impact.

While the latest NALEO poll presented some noteworthy findings, there were still signs of caution, said Stephen Nuño, a pollster with BSP Research, a Democratic polling firm.

For example, contact of Latinos from parties, candidates or political groups is higher than in previous years, with 52% saying they've been reached.

But there also is evidence of high exposure of Latinos to disinformation and significant acceptance of that disinformation, he said.

“Maybe it’s not good contact,” Nuño said.

About 63% of Latinos surveyed said they were exposed to the assertion that the Covid vaccine is an attempt to inject 5G chips into people to monitor the population. Also, 30% said that assertion was mostly true or more true than false, versus 39% who said it was more false than true or mostly false. Scientists have said it’s not possible for vaccines to have monitoring chips.

On abortion, 55% believe it is mostly true or more true than false that abortion is now illegal nationwide and that you can get arrested for abortion, while 26% thought it was mostly false or more false than true.

The Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, rescinding the constitutional right to an abortion, gave states the power to regulate the procedure. Some states have banned it, while others still legally protect it.
Clinics in US state offer free vasectomies after surge in demand following Roe v Wade abortion ruling

Clinics are reporting a big increase in demand for vasectomies after the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade, taking away the constitutional right for a woman to choose to have an abortion.



By Siba Jackson, news reporter
Thursday 13 October 2022
A branch of Planned Parenthood in Springfield, Missouri. Pic: AP

Free vasectomies will be offered at clinics in Missouri in response to a surge in demand after the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade.

Sixty procedures will be available at mobile clinics in St Louis, Springfield and Joplin as part of an initiative run by family planning charity, Planned Parenthood, during the first week of November.

In June, the US Supreme Court, the highest court in America, voted to overturn the constitutional right to choose abortion, which has existed for more than 50 years.

The controversial ruling means a woman's right to decide is now determined individually by each of the 50 US states.

Weeks later in July, Planned Parenthood clinics in St Louis and southwest Missouri performed 42 vasectomies - compared to just 10 in the same month in 2021.

Female sterilisations increased to 18 from just three a year earlier.

The operations will be offered to uninsured patients by Dr Esgar Guarin - who will host the so-called "Nutcracker" mobile clinics alongside the charity.



He then plans to offer a further 40 free vasectomies in the state of Iowa.

The scheme has been launched as part of World Vasectomy Day.

Dr Guarin, who sits on the medical advisory board for the annual event, said: "It's a very particular moment in reproductive rights in the United States. And we need to talk about it."

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists reports more people are seeking the procedure.

Meanwhile Planned Parenthood's national website has seen a 53% spike in vasectomy information searches over the past 100 days, a spokesperson for the charity said.

And data on Google Trends showed vasectomy searches hit their highest level after the US Supreme Court announced its decision.

In Texas, which brought in strict abortion law in the wake of the ruling, the Austin Urology Institute reports carrying out 50% more vasectomies.

Many patients are men who don't want to become fathers and regarded abortion access as a back-up if birth control failed, according to the institute's Dr Koushik Shaw.

"It really pushed family planning to the forefront of people's thoughts," he said.

Dr Margaret Baum, medical director of Planned Parenthood in the St Louis region and southwest Missouri, will work alongside Dr Guarin.

She added: "I think people are afraid, number one, about abortion not being accessible, which I think is a very real and legitimate fear and in the reality for a large part of folks in our country.

"And I think people are also really afraid (of) what else might be next."

Truck driver Denny Dalliance has signed up for a free vasectomy. 
Pic: AP

'Grim circumstances under which I made this decision'

Truck driver Denny Dalliance, 31, signed up for a free vasectomy after fearing the consequences of having a child due to working away from home on most days.

Missouri, his home state, was among the first in the US with a trigger law in effect to ban abortion at any point in pregnancy.

Mr Dalliance said: "These are grim circumstances under which I made this decision.

"I don't want to come off as though I'm unhappy to be doing this, but this is a situation where my hands kind of got forced with regards to the Roe vs Wade decision."

Read more:
Could abortion be banned in Britain?

Explained: How abortion has changed in America since Roe v Wade was overturned

"I feel that with the extreme cost involved with having a child in the United States, I got priced out.

"And so this is me cashing out my chips, as it were.

"It's the right ethical decision for me, but it's not one that's made lightly."



What Is America, and Who Is It For?

S Ericson on October 13, 2022

In the United States, it might seem like one party has a monopoly on nationalism. But, according to new research from Bart Bonikowski, Yuval Feinstein, and Sean Bock, nationalism mattered in the 2016 election for both Democrats and Republicans. Bonikowski and colleagues found support for several types of nationalism, with Democrats and Republicans increasingly divided by which type of nationalism they support. They also found that this partisanship has increased over time.

The researchers argue that the radical right does not have a monopoly on nationalism. International research on radical-right politics has focused on forms of nationalism grounded in prejudices and resentment. This research focuses on the many different types of nationalism, each with its own view of national collective identity.

In their paper, Bonikowski and colleagues explored a nationally representative survey from the six days before Election Day 2016. They also looked at data from several representative surveys over the previous two decades.

They found that many candidates’ supporters held nationalist beliefs. However, the kind of nationalism people supported differed by their political orientation.The researchers asked how nationalist beliefs impact elections. They found that many candidates’ supporters held nationalist beliefs. However, the kind of nationalism people supported differed by their political orientation.

In fact, they found that over time nationalism is increasingly partisan. From 1996 to 2016, believers in different forms of nationalism sorted themselves into different political parties.

The authors argue that partisan division in nationalism may threaten sociopolitical stability. These ideas of nationhood can be powerful and all-encompassing. In a time of considerable political polarization, increasing partisan division on nationalism could erode social solidarity, consensus and political stability.
THIRD WORLD U$A
Low-Income Communities Learn to Tackle Climate-Fueled Heat



Written By Associated Press
Originally Published October 13, 2022 
Climate educating communities
AP Photo/Matt York

Reggie Carrillo knows firsthand that where you live can determine how hot your neighborhood gets.


The environmental activist and educator resides in a largely Mexican American area of south-central Phoenix, where segregation once forced Black and Hispanic people to live south of the railroad tracks. More than a half-century later, the historic lack of investment means fewer trees and subsequent temperatures 13 degrees F (7 C) higher than wealthier, leafier neighborhoods just a few miles away.

RELATED: 2020 Was a Record-Breaking Year for Drought, Wildfires, and Heat in Arizona. 2021 is Poised to Be Even Worse.

“To understand climate change, to understand the urban heat island effect, you have to understand the history,” said Carrillo, who wants to share that knowledge with his neighbors and help cool the community.


Environmental activist Reggie Carrillo, right, speaks with a community member, Friday, Sept 28, 2022, in Phoenix. Carrillo has benefited from one of several nonprofit initiatives to educate and engage residents about climate-fueled heat that disproportionately affects low-income neighborhoods of color. (AP Photo/Matt York)

Carrillo has benefited from one of several nonprofit initiatives popping up around the United States to educate and engage residents about climate-fueled heat that disproportionately affects low-income neighborhoods of color.

Among the most ambitious is an Urban Heat Leadership Academy launched last year by the Phoenix Revitalization Corporation, a nonprofit community development corporation, and The Nature Conservancy. Better known for preserving natural areas, the nonprofit global conservancy is now also doing more work in urban areas, like planting hundreds of trees and overseeing community gardens in Atlanta’s South River neighborhood.

Held virtually on Saturday mornings with experts in various aspects of climate change, the course teaches residents like Carrillo not only why their communities are getting so hot but also how to organize and advocate for cooler, greener, healthier neighborhoods. Other topics discussed include water, air quality, and environmental equity for poorer Black, Latino and Indigenous neighborhoods.

As climate change leads to more intense, frequent, and longer-lasting heat waves across the United States and around the world, historically temperate and even cold areas are grappling with the effects of high temperatures.

Gray, cool, and drizzly much of the year, the Pacific Northwest roasted with triple-digit temperatures during an unusual heat wave last summer that was blamed for numerous deaths. The temperatures in Oregon and Washington state soared back up into the 90s this summer, a sign that global warming has created a new normal for hot weather in the region.

Residents attend an event hosted by Arizona State University graduate design students at Academia del Pueblo charter school, Friday, Sept 28, 2022, in Phoenix. Community members were learning how to organize and advocate for cooler, greener, healthier neighborhoods. 
(AP Photo/Matt York)

In Philadelphia, where temperatures typically fall into the 20s and 30s (-7 to -1 C) in the winter, summers are becoming increasingly hotter, with more summer days pushing over 90 degrees (over 32 C).

The national nonprofit Trust for Public Land recently wrapped up a two-year initiative that used public art to raise awareness about the growing dangers of urban heat and spark conversation about extreme temperatures in low-income communities of color in that northeast city.

They distributed “Seedlings” coloring books designed by local artists with messages in English and Spanish in the heavily Hispanic Fairhill neighborhood and organized public art workshops on designing shade structures and mural painting in racially diverse Grays Ferry.

The Environmental Protection Agency recently recognized Philadelphia’s Heat Response project and similar initiatives are now underway or proposed in places around the US, including New York’s Harlem neighborhood, Miami, Seattle, and California’s Ventura County.

Owen Franklin, director of the Trust for Public Land in Pennsylvania, said the Philadelphia project sparked conversations about crowded, aging neighborhoods that experience temperatures up to 20 degrees (11 C) hotter than nearby ones because they don’t have parks or enough tree canopy.

Read More: Arizona Is Getting Hotter—And It’s Only Supposed to Get Worse

“There is a lot of learning all of us need to do, and not just people living in these neighborhoods,” said Franklin, noting that organizers learned from community members that they often sleep with closed windows on hot summer nights due to concerns about crime.

“The rest of us need to know what people experience so we can combat the problem,” he said.

In Phoenix, Carrillo is working with several other graduates of the five-month academy to design a “cool corridor,” a pedestrian path that will be lined with plants native to the Sonoran desert-like mesquite trees, cactus, and creosote to be purchased with a grant from the Nature Conservancy and planted this fall. The team also plans related community meetings with local residents.

“We want people to have their voices be heard about what their neighborhoods look like,” said Carrillo.

The academy held its first-course last year with about 40 neighborhood residents who joined the weekly gatherings online to hear subject experts explain such things as transpiration, a process that allows plants to cool off surrounding areas, and the impacts of extreme heat on people.

“We are trying to help people to work on solutions that will cool down their neighborhoods over the long term,” said Anna Bettis, the healthy cities program director for The Nature Conservancy in Arizona. “Shade is a resource. If you just look around, you can see how unequally it is distributed in some neighborhoods.”

And it’s not just in places more accustomed to extremely high temperatures like Phoenix’s Maricopa County, where the mercury hit 115 degrees F (46.1 C) in July, and 339 people died of heat-associated causes last year.

Environmental activist Reggie Carrillo speaks with community members, Friday, Sept 28, 2022, in Phoenix. Carrillo has benefited from one of several nonprofit initiatives to educate and engage residents about climate-fueled heat that disproportionately affects low-income neighborhoods of color. (AP Photo/Matt York)

A Nature Conservancy initiative in Atlanta has planted 300 trees, and overseen eight community gardens along that city’s Southern River, said Bettis.

Carrillo discussed his team’s plans for a cool corridor with a few visitors to an informal event organized in late September by an Arizona State University class of graduate design students at Academia del Pueblo, a K-8 charter school in his neighborhood.


“We don’t have proper sidewalks here and a lot of our students have to walk five or more blocks without shade in more than 100 degree heat (37.7 C),” said Teresa Silva, who teaches at the school. “We don’t have transportation and their parents often work several jobs and can’t pick them up.”

Neighbor Carlos Ramirez stopped by with his son Alexis, 13, to learn how the ASU students are examining ways to improve shade in the area.

“It can get hot here,” the elder Ramirez allowed. “It would be good to have more trees.”

In another Phoenix neighborhood with sparse shade, heat academy graduate Curtis Merritt, a disabled Navy veteran, is working with his team to plant up to a dozen fig, apple, pear, and citrus trees in an area considered to be a food desert, without adequate access to nutritious food.

The public school student body in Merritt’s rundown neighborhood north of the Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport is working class, and about 80% Latino and the local Prentice Park has become home to scores of homeless people in recent years.


“What’s great about this project is that I not only get to help cool down my neighborhood by teaching and engaging,” said Merritt. “Someday with those trees I’ll be able to feed my neighbors, too.”
GEICO workers in Buffalo area join the union-organizing legions

October 12, 2022 
 BY MARK GRUENBERG

From GEICO United Labor Union Facebook page: "Todd Combs our CEO after layoffs at #geico - in Buffalo, New York."


GETZVILLE, N.Y.—Modeling their union on the successful independent Amazon Labor Union, a group of GEICO workers in one of the nation’s least-unionized fields, insurance, are campaigning to organize 2,500 of the giant insurer’s workers in the Buffalo area.

Bosses’ “aggressive and unfair” union-busting tactics haven’t stopped the drive, as organizers can point out one top problem is too much work for too few people. In 2020, the independent Geico United union reports, the firm’s Region 8, which includes GEICO’s office in the Buffalo suburb of Getzville, employed 3,500 people. Now it’s down to 2,500.

Geico United shares several characteristics with the Amazon Labor Union. ALU is a grass-roots union that cracked through Amazon’s rampant hostility by a convincing NLRB election win at Amazon’s JFK8 warehouse in Staten Island, N.Y., at the other end of the state. Amazon is still contesting that victory. Geico United hopes to duplicate that.

And both challenge a megaboss who is one of the three richest men in the U.S. Jeff Bezos is founder and majority shareholder of Amazon. Warren Buffett owns 100% of GEICO.

If Geico United wins, it would be a big jump in one of the least-unionized professions in the U.S. Only 38,000 insurance workers nationwide (1.5%) are unionists, the Bureau of Labor Statistics’s 2021 union density survey shows. Contracts cover 20,000 more non-members.

The group is also pushing workers to sign National Labor Relations Board union election authorization cards quickly, given that GEICO’s working conditions have produced 50%-60% yearly turnover in some departments.

The union’s fact sheet lays out a long list of reasons for GEICO workers to unionize. Benefits top it. “GEICO has not contributed anything to our retirement accounts since January, 2021,” it starts. “It gives raises that are less than cost of living adjustments and sometimes nothing at all. The pension was eliminated in 2004, and profit sharing could be next.”

The Getzville worksite is rife with bosses’ micromanagement and GEICO “creates stressful workplaces by continuously threatening ‘corrective’ action.” Bosses also regularly spy on workers, show favoritism in hiring, ban workers from “free use of their earned time off,” and “hired new agents during the (coronavirus) pandemic with starting salaries higher than tenured agents.”

And bosses post open positions so quietly and for such short times that only their favorites, who are tipped off in advance, apply for them.

GEICO’s also “repurposing employees and forcing them into other positions without their consent,” Geico United says. Harvard’s OnLabor blog reports GEICO anti-union tactics include ubiquitous employer-run “captive audience” meetings and harangues, anti-union e-mails and anti-union workplace posters. Amazon posted anti-union posters in bathrooms.

And on September 13, Geico United filed a long list of labor law-breaking charges against the firm and regional Vice President Melinda Seibold. They included banning union literature from non-worksite bulletin boards, illegally monitoring workers’ social media postings, banning workers from discussing wages, hours and working conditions, and declaring unionizing would be futile “because it takes an average of 450 days to get a contract.”

All this argues for unionizing GEICO workers, the group contends. Paraphrasing the great Jewish sage Hillel, the group’s fact sheet argues: “If not now, then when?”
New UK finance minister Jeremy Hunt admits mistakes, signals tax hike

Hunt indicates a reversal of Truss' central theme of lowering taxes

PTI Updated: October 15, 2022 
New Chancellor of the Exchequer Jeremy Hunt in London | Reuters

Jeremy Hunt, the new UK Chancellor appointed by Prime Minister Liz Truss after she sacked her friend Kwasi Kwarteng in an attempt to calm the ongoing economic and political crisis, admitted on Saturday that mistakes were made by his predecessor and signalled a reversal of his tax-cutting approach.

Hunt, a former Conservative Party leadership contender who is dubbed as the most powerful man in the UK government as Truss battles to win back her credibility, also indicated that spending cuts would have to be brought in across all state departments to deal with the tough economic climate.

He acknowledged that the mini-budget tabled by Kwarteng at the end of last month had two mistakes, cutting the 45-pence rate of tax for highest earners, an announcement since reversed, and announcing the tax-cutting package without independent costings by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR).

"The way we went about it clearly wasn't right and that's why I'm sitting here now," he told the BBC.

"Taxes are not going to come down by as much as people hoped, and some taxes will have to go up. I'm going to be asking all government departments to find additional efficiency savings," he said.

It indicates a reversal of Truss' central theme of lowering taxes on which she had campaigned to win the Conservative Party leadership race against former Chancellor Rishi Sunak.

This means the turbulence at the very top of the UK government is far from over, with disgruntled Tory rebels and Sunak loyalists defiantly against the new leader amid her various U-turns. The fact that she fired Kwarteng just 38 days into the job for announcing policies in the mini-budget that she campaigned for is being seen as an attempt to shift the blame entirely on him for the financial markets chaos that ensued.

Conservative MP Andrew Bridgen, who backed Sunak in the leadership race, said he believes there would "be a challenge to Truss in the next few weeks".

"Dissatisfaction is so high in the parliamentary party. Removing Kwasi Kwarteng when he implemented the policies she asked him to do won't engender loyalty to her," he said.

Former Conservative leader William Hague meanwhile said Truss' leadership is "hanging by a thread". According to party insiders, it is hard to find Tory MPs who do not believe that Truss' days at 10 Downing Street are numbered.

"We can't possibly force another Prime Minister out of office, we've just got to calm down and try to give the prime minister our support," said Tory MP and Truss supporter Christopher Chope.

Truss herself has insisted that she would stay on as Prime Minister to get the economy growing.

"I'm absolutely determined to see through what I promised to deliver a higher growth, more prosperous United Kingdom to see us through the storm we face," she said at the Downing Street press conference on Friday branded the shortest in recent history during which she brushed off questions about her resignation.

It came at the end of a dramatic day of events, which began with Kwarteng flying back early from his Washington trip and ending one of the shortest runs at 11 Downing Street as the UK's Treasury chief in history.
Biden Labor Dept. seeks to reverse Trump ‘independent contractor’ dodge

October 13, 2022
 BY MARK GRUENBERG


Alastair Grant / AP

WASHINGTON—After dumping a Donald Trump scheme to harm millions of more workers by making them “independent contractors,” Democratic President Joe Biden’s Labor Department plans to go in the other direction, making it tougher for firms to misclassify workers that way and rob them of the right to organize, jobless benefits, workers comp, and—unless they pay all the taxes themselves—Social Security and Medicare.

“To both rescind” Trump’s pro-corporate scheme “and replace it with detailed regulations addressing multifactor economic reality—in a way that more fully reflects the case law and provides the flexibility needed for application to the entire economy—would be helpful for both workers and employers,” DOL said in its proposed new federal rule, published October 13.

Instead of giving more weight to one characteristic of a workers’ job over another—such as whether the worker can decide her own schedules—DOL would judge if a worker is an “employee” or an “independent contractor” based on “the totality of circumstances” on the job.

That would include not just schedules, but who sets work rules, if the firm can hire or fire the worker, pay, benefits, requirements such as driving company vehicles and using company materials, and carrying out company orders.

AFL-CIO President Liz Shuler hailed DOL’s announcement, and added Congress should go even further and write stronger worker protections into law. She vowed the fed would keep up its drive for that goal.

The Protect the Right to Organize (PRO) Act, labor’s #1 congressional priority but stopped by a corporate-backed Senate Republican filibuster threat, would curb the bosses’ abuse of calling workers “independent contractors,” among other changes.

Republican-named judges make that even more necessary. Biden’s DOL dumped Trump’s pro-corporate independent contractor rule in March 2021, but corporate chieftains found a Republican-named federal judge in rural East Texas—their favorite area—to restore it. Biden’s proposed rule would override that decision, DOL says.

“By restoring common-sense rules to determine who is an employee, and making it harder for employers to intentionally misclassify their employees as independent contractors, the Department of Labor’s (DOL’s) announcement will increase protections and expand benefits to so many working people who have been subjected to corporate work-arounds,” Shuler said.

“Too many companies put profits over people, intentionally misclassifying their workers as contractors to avoid providing the pay, overtime, workplace rights, and benefits employees are due under labor and employment laws. This proposed rule will ensure DOL has the tools to protect employees against the current and escalating problem of misclassification. “

Misclassifying workers as “independent contractors” under federal labor law—including the minimum wage-overtime Fair Labor Standards Act and the 1935 National Labor Relations Act—is a favorite boss strategy to shortchange workers, or worse, and line corporate coffers.

Under both laws, if a workers are “employees,” they have the right to unionize, enjoy the NLRA’s protections—however weak—and qualify for the federal minimum wage, plus overtime pay if they work more than 40 hours a week.

They also come under the Social Security Act and workers’ comp laws, which force bosses to pay payroll taxes to fund all three earned benefits. Workers match employers’ payroll taxes for the first two.

But if bosses can get away with calling workers “independent contractors,” working for themselves, even when they don’t, the bosses don’t pay the taxes, don’t have to pay the minimum wage or overtime, and the workers don’t get either Social Security or Medicare unless they pay both their taxes and the bosses’ shares, too.

They’re also ineligible for workers’ comp and can’t unionize, either.

The problem, DOL said, lies in the definition of who’s an “independent contractor” and who’s an “employee.” The Trump scheme, pushed by bosses, made the independent contractor category as broad as possible. Biden’s DOL, favoring the “employees,” wants to restore the pre-Trump difference federal courts upheld for years.

“Courts rely on a broad, multifactor ‘economic reality’ analysis derived from precedent. Unlike the control-focused analysis for independent contractors applied under the common law,” and unlike what Trump proposed, “the economic reality test focuses more broadly on a worker’s economic dependence on an employer, considering the totality of the circumstances.”

“Misclassification is a serious issue that denies workers’ rights and protections under federal labor standards, promotes wage theft, allows certain employers to gain an unfair advantage over law-abiding businesses, and hurts the economy at-large,” DOL said in its press release on the proposed rule. The deadline for comments is November 28.

In its proposed rule, DOL said the Trump rule disproportionately hurts women and workers of color. It also said Trump admitted workers might lose money by being misclassified or reclassified as independent contractors, but didn’t say how much they would lose.

DOL’s notice pointed out that 8% of self-employed independent contractors earned under the $7.25 federal minimum wage—which they didn’t qualify for—and nothing for overtime. And 29% of independent contractors logged a mean of 15.4 hours of unpaid overtime per week. Meanwhile, 17% of employees, who get overtime pay, tolled a mean of 11.8 hours of OT per week.

CONTRIBUTOR

Mark Gruenberg
Award-winning journalist Mark Gruenberg is head of the Washington, D.C., bureau of People's World. He is also the editor of the union news service Press Associates Inc. (PAI). Known for his reporting skills, sharp wit, and voluminous knowledge of history, Mark is a compassionate interviewer but a holy terror when going after big corporations and their billionaire owners. El galardonado periodista Mark Gruenberg es el director de la oficina de People's World en Washington, D.C. También es editor del servicio de noticias sindicales Press Associates Inc. (PAI).

Gig Workers Get A Leg Up

 A Grubhub delivery worker in New York.
 (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan, File)


Oct 15, 2022
Ricardo Gomez

Good things are happening! A new Labor Department rule will expand the basic rights of gig workers. Also, an anti-abortion case with national ramifications was stopped in its tracks, unionized nurses in the Midwest are holding hospitals accountable, wind farms are proving to be a great return on investment, and Delaware is breaking cycles of debt with a bold new policy.

All this and much more in this week’s edition of You Love To See It below, a weekly feature reviewing good news, progress, and action steps that’s one of the many features available only to Lever supporting subscribers.

Biden Admin Moves To Protect Gig Workers

The Department of Labor announced a new rule that could help millions of gig workers, including drivers, janitors, and construction workers, by classifying them as employees rather than independent contractors. This reclassification could require companies to provide gig workers with the same benefits as employees: a minimum wage, overtime pay, and unemployment insurance.

“While independent contractors have an important role in our economy, we have seen in many cases that employers misclassify their employees as independent contractors, particularly among our nation’s most vulnerable workers,” Secretary of Labor Marty Walsh said in a statement. “Misclassification deprives workers of their federal labor protections, including their right to be paid their full, legally earned wages.”

After the proposed rule was announced, the stocks of Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash — companies that rely on exploitative gig arrangements — plummeted. “There’s no better proof that gig companies’ business model is built on exploitation of workers,” tweeted labor reporting group More Perfect Union.

Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher, leader of the California Labor Federation, told the New York Times that the impacts of the new rule depend on how aggressively the Biden administration chooses to enforce it. Even so, the guidance will likely shape how judges and employers determine worker classification.

“Companies just continue to break labor law. They break it at the local level, the state level and federally, and there are no consequences. Everything is about enforcement,” said Fletcher.
MUTINY!

Russian army recruits turn guns on fellow soldiers, killing 11 and wounding 15

October 16, 2022 — 

Moscow: Two men have fired at soldiers on a Russian military firing range near Ukraine, killing 11 and wounding 15 before being slain themselves, the Russian Defence Ministry said.

The ministry said in a statement on Saturday (Europe time) that the shooting took place in the Belgorod region in south-western Russia that borders Ukraine. It said two men from an unnamed former Soviet republic fired on volunteer soldiers during target practice and were killed by return fire.


Russian Army recruits hold their weapons during a military training at a firing range in Donetsk on October 4.CREDIT:AP

The ministry called the incident a terrorist attack.

The shooting comes amid a hasty mobilisation ordered by President Vladimir Putin to beef up Russian forces in Ukraine – a move that triggered protests and caused hundreds of thousands to flee Russia.

Putin said Friday that over 220,000 reservists already had been called up as part of an effort to recruit 300,000. He promised the mobilisation would be wrapped up in two weeks.

The mobilisation was troubled from the start, with authorities issuing confusing signals about who should be called up for service in a country where almost all men under age 65 are listed as reservists.



After days of intense destruction across Ukraine, Russia's Vladimir Putin says that he sees "no need" at this stage to conduct large-scale strikes, even hinting at withdrawing troops from part of the occupied south.

Even though the Russian leader declared that only people who had recently served in the military would be subject to the call-up, activists and rights groups reported military conscription offices rounding up people without any army experience – some of whom were also unfit for service for medical reasons.

Some of the freshly called-up reservists posted videos of themselves being forced to sleep on the floor or even outside and given rusty weapons before being sent to the front lines.

Russian media reports said some of those who were mobilised were sent to combat without receiving proper training and were quickly killed.

Authorities have acknowledged the mobilisation was often poorly organised and promised to improve the situation.



Russia’s defence ministry said two men fired at troops at a Russian military firing range near Ukraine.CREDIT:AP

Russia has lost ground in the nearly seven weeks since Ukraine’s armed forces opened their southern counteroffensive. This week, the Kremlin launched what is believed to be its largest coordinated air and missile raids on Ukraine’s key infrastructure since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on February 24.

In the continuation of those attacks, a missile strike Saturday seriously damaged a key energy facility in Ukraine’s capital region, the country’s grid operator said. Following mounting setbacks, the Russian military has worked to cut off power and water in far-flung populated areas while also fending off Ukrainian counterattacks in occupied areas.

In the Zaporizhzhia region, Governor Oleksandr Starukh said the Russian military carried out strikes with suicide drones from Iran and long-range S-300 missiles. Some experts said the Russian military’s use of the surface-to-air missiles may reflect shortages of dedicated precision weapons for hitting ground targets.

Dmytro Pocishchuk, a hospital medic in the Zaporizhzhia region’s capital who has treated dozens of people wounded during Russian attacks in recent weeks, said people sought safety outdoors or in his building’s basement when the familiar blasts started at 5.15am on Saturday (Ukraine time).


Russia-Ukraine war
Russians told to flee recently ‘annexed’ region as Ukrainians advance


“If Ukraine stops, these bombings and killings will continue. We can’t give up to the Russian Federation,’” Pocishchuk said several hours later. He put a small Ukrainian flag on the broken windshield of his heavily damaged car.

Kyiv region Governor Oleksiy Kuleba said the missile that hit a power facility on Saturday morning didn’t kill or wound anyone. Citing security, Ukrainian officials didn’t identify the site, one of many infrastructure targets the Russian military tried to destroy after an Oct. 8 truck bomb explosion damaged the bridge that links Russia to the annexed Crimean Peninsula.

Ukrainian electricity transmission company Ukrenergo said repair crews were working to restore electricity service, but warned residents about further possible outages. Kyrylo Tymoshenko, the deputy head of the Ukrainian president’s office, urged residents of the capital and three neighbouring regions to conserve energy.

“Putin may hope that by increasing the misery of the Ukrainian people, President (Volodymyr) Zelenskyy may be more inclined to negotiate a settlement that allows Russia to retain some stolen territory in the east or Crimea,” said Ian Williams, a fellow at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a policy organisation based in Washington. “A quick look at history shows that the strategic bombing of civilians is an ineffective way to achieve a political aim. ”

This week’s wide-ranging retaliatory attacks, which included the use of self-destructing explosive drones from Iran, killed dozens of people. The strikes hit residential buildings as well as infrastructure such as power stations in Kyiv, Lviv in western Ukraine, and other cities that had seen comparatively few strikes in recent months.

Putin said Friday that Moscow didn’t see a need for additional massive strikes but his military would continue selective ones. He said that of 29 targets the Russian military planned to knock out in this week’s attacks, seven weren’t damaged and would be taken out gradually.

The Institute for the Study of War, a think tank based in Washington, interpreted Putin’s remarks as intended to counter criticism from pro-war Russian bloggers who “largely praised the resumption of strikes against Ukrainian cities, but warned that a short campaign would be ineffective.”

In the southern Kherson region, one of the first areas of Ukraine to fall to Russia after the invasion and which Putin also illegally designated as Russian territory last month, Ukrainian forces pressed their counteroffensive Saturday.

Kyiv’s army has reported recapturing 75 villages and towns there in the last month, but said the momentum had slowed, with the fighting settling into the sort of gruelling back-and-forth that characterised Russia’s months-long offensive to conquer Ukraine’s eastern Donbas region.

RELATED ARTICLE

Explainer

On Saturday, Ukrainian troops attempted to advance south along the banks of the Dnieper River toward the regional capital, also named Kherson, but didn’t gain any ground, according to Kirill Stremousov, a deputy head of the occupied region’s Moscow-installed administration.

“The defence lines worked, and the situation has remained under the full control of the Russian army,” he wrote on his messaging app channel.

The Kremlin-backed local leaders asked civilians Thursday to leave the region to ensure their safety and to give Russian troops more manoeuvrability. Stremousov reminded them they could evacuate to Crimea and cities in southwestern Russia, where Moscow offered free accommodations to residents who agreed to leave.

Maj. Gen. Igor Konashenkov, the Russian Defence Ministry’s spokesman, said the military destroyed five crossings on the Inhulets River, another route Ukraine’s fighters could take to progress toward the Kherson region.

Konashenkov claimed Russian troops also blocked Ukrainian attempts to make inroads in breaching Russian defences near Lyman, a city in the annexed Donetsk region of eastern Ukraine that the Ukrainians retook two weeks ago in a significant defeat for the Kremlin.

AP
‘The hell with it’: Elon Musk tweets SpaceX will ‘keep funding Ukraine govt for free’ amid Starlink controversy

PUBLISHED SAT, OCT 15 2022
Ashley Capoot@ASHLEYCAPOOT


KEY POINTS
Elon Musk said in a tweet Saturday that his company SpaceX would continue to fund Starlink satellite internet terminals for the Ukrainian government as it battles invading Russian forces.

The tweets follow a statement from Musk on Friday in which he said that SpaceX cannot continue fund Starlink terminals in Ukraine “indefinitely.”



A smartphone with the Starlink logo displayed on the screen.
Sopa Images | Lightrocket | Getty Images


Elon Musk said in a tweet Saturday that his company SpaceX would continue to fund Starlink satellite internet terminals for the Ukrainian government as it battles invading Russian forces.

“The hell with it,” the billionaire tweeted, “even though Starlink is still losing money & other companies are getting billions of taxpayer $, we’ll just keep funding Ukraine govt for free.”

It was not immediately clear whether Musk, who is also the CEO of Tesla, was being sarcastic. In response to a tweet about the move, Musk said, “we should still do good deeds.” Responding to another tweet saying that Musk had already paid taxes that are funding Ukraine’s defense, he said, “Fate loves irony.”


The tweets follow a statement from Musk on Friday in which he said that SpaceX cannot continue fund Starlink terminals in Ukraine “indefinitely,” after a report suggested his space company had asked the Pentagon to cover the costs.

Musk did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

In a letter from SpaceX to the Pentagon, the company said that the use of Starlink in Ukraine could cost close to $400 million over the next 12 months, according to a report by CNN. SpaceX has signed several contracts with the U.S. government.
SpaceX’s donated Starlink internet terminals have been crucial in keeping Ukraine’s military online during the war against Russia, even as communication infrastructure gets destroyed. Russia began its invasion of Ukraine in February.

Musk drew criticism from Ukrainian officials earlier this month when he posted a Twitter poll gauging support for what he claimed was a likely outcome of the Russia-Ukraine war.

He appeared to confirm that SpaceX was planning to leave Ukraine in some capacity Friday, replying to a Twitter post that referenced the Ukrainian ambassador telling Musk to “f--- off.”

“We’re just following his recommendation,” Musk said.

The SpaceX founder is also in the middle of a $44 billion bid to buy Twitter, which he had tried to get out of. A judge ruled that he has until Oct. 28 to close the acquisition if he hopes to avoid a trial.

OUTSOURCING  LOWBALLS

Musk says Starlink can’t keep providing Ukraine broadband unless Pentagon pays

SpaceX and US in talks, but Pentagon says it has "other" satellite options.


JON BRODKIN - 10/14/2022, 



SpaceX has asked the Pentagon to fund the Ukraine government and military's use of Starlink broadband, saying the Elon Musk-led company can't afford to donate more user terminals or pay for operations indefinitely, CNN reported.

"We are not in a position to further donate terminals to Ukraine, or fund the existing terminals for an indefinite period of time," SpaceX's director of government sales wrote to the Pentagon in a September letter, according to CNN. The letter "requested that the Pentagon take over funding for Ukraine's government and military use of Starlink, which SpaceX claims would cost more than $120 million for the rest of the year and could cost close to $400 million for the next 12 months."

Musk defended the request today. "SpaceX is not asking to recoup past expenses, but also cannot fund the existing system indefinitely and send several thousand more terminals that have data usage up to 100X greater than typical households. This is unreasonable," he wrote on Twitter.

The CNN article said that "roughly 20,000 Starlink satellite units have been donated to Ukraine" and that the Ukraine military asked for 8,000 more in July.

Musk: Operation has cost SpaceX $80 million

SpaceX's Starlink division sent satellite terminals to Ukraine after Russia's invasion of the country disrupted broadband networks, and the Internet access has been useful in Ukraine's military operations against Russian forces. The US initially provided $3 million for the effort.

Musk wrote last week that "only a small percentage" of Starlink terminals and service were paid for by outside sources and that the "operation has cost SpaceX $80M & will exceed $100M by end of year."Advertisement

According to CNN's article, the SpaceX letter to the Pentagon said "about 85 percent of the 20,000 terminals in Ukraine were paid—or partially paid—for by countries like the US and Poland or other entities. Those entities also paid for about 30 percent of the Internet connectivity, which SpaceX says costs $4,500 each month per unit for the most advanced service."

The $4,500-per-month figure seems to refer to the typical fee for that tier of service, rather than to SpaceX's actual costs to provide it.

"SpaceX says it has paid for about 70 percent of the service provided to Ukraine and claims to have offered that highest level —$4,500 a month—to all terminals in Ukraine despite the majority only having signed on for the cheaper $500 per month service," CNN wrote. "The terminals themselves cost $1,500 and $2,500 for the two models sent to Ukraine, the documents say, while consumer models on Starlink's website are far cheaper and service in Ukraine is just $60 per month."

SpaceX request “rankled” Pentagon brass

The funding request seems to have triggered a conflict between SpaceX and the Pentagon. "SpaceX's request that the US military foot the bill has rankled top brass at the Pentagon, with one senior defense official telling CNN that SpaceX has 'the gall to look like heroes' while having others pay so much and now presenting them with a bill for tens of millions per month," CNN wrote.

The Pentagon took a more measured tone publicly. "I can confirm that the department has been in communication with SpaceX regarding Starlink," Pentagon deputy press secretary Sabrina Singh said, according to the Financial Times. "We're working with our partners and allies trying to figure out what's best.

"There are certainly other Satcom capabilities that exist out there,” she also said. "There's not just SpaceX, there are other entities that we can certainly partner with when it comes to providing Ukraine with what they need on the battlefield."

On October 3, after Musk wrote a controversial tweet proposing terms for a Ukraine-Russia peace, Ukrainian diplomat Andrij Melnyk told Musk to "fuck off." While SpaceX's letter to the Pentagon was sent months before that Twitter exchange, Musk today replied to a journalist who suggested the funding request and Melnyk's tweet to Musk were connected. "We're just following his recommendation," Musk wrote.

Melnyk's Twitter profile says he is Ukraine's ambassador to Germany. But he was fired from that post in July, "a week after the diplomat gave an interview in which he defended the legacy of a World War II nationalist leader who collaborated with the Nazis," The New York Times reported at the time.

Some Ukrainians pay for Starlink themselves

Amid the funding conflict, some Ukrainians tweeted about how they and Ukraine soldiers have been paying for Starlink service themselves.

"All the Starlinks I have seen/used were bought either by volunteers like myself, or soldiers put their personal money in. The subscription price is also paid out of the pocket. In my charity fund @dzygaspaw, I have bought and delivered to the frontlines over 50 Starlinks, some of them are still being paid from my credit card, now $60 each per month," Dimko Zhluktenko wrote.

CNN's article on the SpaceX letter to the Pentagon said there have been "wide-ranging Starlink outages as Ukrainian troops attempt to retake ground occupied by Russia in the eastern and southern parts of the country."

"That has affected every effort of the Ukrainians to push past that front," CNN quoted a source as saying. "Starlink is the main way units on the battlefield have to communicate."

Pentagon confirms US in talks with Musk’s company over funding Ukraine’s Starlink




Ellen Mitchell
Fri, October 14, 2022 

The Pentagon on Friday confirmed that the Biden administration was in talks with SpaceX over who will foot the bill for the critical internet service in Ukraine provided by the company’s Starlink.

The director of government sales for SpaceX, owned by CEO Elon Musk, reportedly sent a letter to the Pentagon last month stating it could no longer fund Starlink in Ukraine as it is expected to cost hundreds of millions of dollars to keep it running for the next year, according to documents CNN said it obtained.

“I can confirm that the [Defense Department] has been in communication with SpaceX regarding Starlink,” Pentagon deputy press secretary Sabrina Singh told reporters Friday. “I’m not going to get into further details of this discussion just now. … But we’re working with our partners and allies in trying to figure out what’s best.”

Pressed repeatedly as to when the Pentagon first began communications with SpaceX, which was involved and the nature of the talks, Singh would not offer details.

She added that officials “understand the fragility” of the Ukrainian communications system and are “assessing our options and trying to do what we can to help keep these … capabilities to ensure that these communications remain for the Ukrainian forces.”

“There are certainly other [satellite communication] capabilities that exist out there,” Singh said, when asked if there are any other commercially available alternatives to Starlink. “There’s not just SpaceX, there are other entities that we can certainly partner with when it comes to providing Ukraine with what they need on the battlefield.”

Starlink services in Ukraine are critical to the country in its ongoing war with Russia, and losing such a communications system is likely to have a detrimental effect on its armed forces. The Ukrainian military has credited the reliable, lightweight and mobile internet terminals as crucial to military and civilian communication.

Musk earlier on Friday seemed to confirm that SpaceX had reached out to the Pentagon regarding Starlink costs when he tweeted that his company must “create, launch, maintain & replenish satellites & ground stations & pay telcos for access to Internet via gateways,” as well as “defend against cyberattacks & jamming, which are getting harder.” He claimed that was costing the company about $20 million a month.

SpaceX’s communications with the Pentagon come as Musk, the world’s richest man, has faced intense scrutiny over his suggestions for a negotiated settlement to end the war. He proposed that Russia keep Crimea in such a settlement, an idea that was roundly rejected by Ukrainian leaders.

And though Musk initially received widespread acclaim for providing the Starlink service to Ukraine at the start of the war, it was revealed that most of the 20,000 terminals in the country are completely or partially funded by outside sources such as the U.S. government, the United Kingdom and Poland, CNN reported.


Starlink Demonstrates the Need To Rein in Capital


angryea
Community
(This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)
Friday October 14, 2022 ·


FOUND IN THE DICTIONARY UNDER; HUBRIS

Elon is having himself a hissy fit


The genesis of Elon's little tantrum appears to be the Ukraine leadership did not appreciate him parroting Russian talking points about how the war should end. Ostensibly, this is about not being paid. But, well, that turns out to not be entirely believable:

Screenshot2022-10-14085718.jpg

Though Musk has received widespread acclaim and thanks for responding to requests for Starlink service to Ukraine right as the war was starting, in reality, the vast majority of the 20,000 terminals have received full or partial funding from outside sources, including the US government, the UK and Poland, according to the SpaceX letter to the Pentagon.

SpaceX’s request that the US military foot the bill has rankled top brass at the Pentagon, with one senior defense official telling CNN that SpaceX has “the gall to look like heroes” while having others pay so much and now presenting them with a bill for tens of millions per month.Exclusive: Musk's SpaceX says it can no longer pay for critical satellite services in Ukraine, asks Pentagon to pick up the tab | CNN Politics

In other, surely unrelated news, it came out yesterday that Elon is being investigated by the SEC over his antics around his on-again off-again purchase of Twitter. I am certain the famously thin-skinned Elon would not be pulling his support for a critical piece of wartime infrastructure as a way to get the SEC to back off its investigation?

People like Musk clearly have too much power in our system. If you disagree with the policy of supporting the Ukraine, you are allowed to argue against it, to protest, to vote Republican, etc. You should not be allowed, as one person, to rip away a vital piece of national security technology on a whim, or as a chit or get out of jail free card.

And I don't want to hear anything about how the government is taking his property. They are already paying for the service, and the invented most of the core technology that he is using to run those satellite. Nor do I want to hear about the sanctity of property. No right is completely absolute. No one is forcing Elon to march to the front, no one is moving soldiers into his home. They are paying for use of a small portion of his network to advance national security goals (and, incidentally, defend a largely democratic state against a quasi-genocidal invasion. That bears some mention here). Nor do I want to hear that the government should build a system itself. In our system, core infrastructure at every level, for good and ill, is built by allowing private people to profit from their construction and maintenance. It's not the system I would want, but it's the system we have. We cannot then turn around and allow those people to harm the overall society via their control.

Being part of a democratic society means you have obligations as well as responsibilities. Musk benefits from the basic research the government provides to make himself rich, builds his businesses under the protection of the rule of law and military might provided by his fellow citizens, and has received untold monies in subsidies and tax breaks to keep his businesses afloat. People who have been allowed to profit building critical infrastructure should not be allowed to use that infrastructure for their own personal whims.


Elon Musk balks at funding Ukraine’s Starlink satellites, as envoy tells him to ‘fuck off’


Company asks US military to cough up for the critical satellite system.


Tesla CEO Elon Musk said, “We are not in a position to further donate terminals to Ukraine" | Carina Johansen/NTB/AFP via Getty Images

BY WILHELMINE PREUSSEN
OCTOBER 14, 2022

Elon Musk said on Friday he's "just following the recommendation" of a Ukrainian diplomat who told the SpaceX founder to "fuck off," by seeking to offload responsibility for funding his Starlink internet terminals in Ukraine.

Musk's trolling came after Ukraine’s former Ambassador to Germany Andrij Melnyk and the country's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy reacted with hostility to Musk last week tweeting a series of Kremlin talking points, which he presented as a plan for peace in Russia's war on Ukraine. This raised concerns in Kyiv and among its allies as to whether Musk was still on Ukraine's side in the war.

Musk's tweet came in response to a CNN report that SpaceX had warned in a letter, dated September 8 and sent to the U.S. Department of Defense, that it can no longer afford to provide its Starlink terminals, which are crucial for Ukraine's military communication.

“We are not in a position to further donate terminals to Ukraine, or fund the existing terminals for an indefinite period of time,” SpaceX said in the letter, which was signed by the company's director of government sales, adding that the Pentagon should take over the funding.

The Starlink satellite communication system has been crucial not only for Ukraine's military communication, but also for the government to maintain contact with commanders, for Zelenskyy to conduct interviews with journalists, and for civilian communications, connecting loved ones via the encrypted satellites.

Funding the systems would cost more than $120 million for the rest of the year and the price tag could reach almost $400 million for the next 12 months, according to SpaceX.

Ukraine has received around 20,000 Starlink satellite units. Musk said last week that the “operation has cost SpaceX $80 million and will exceed $100 million by the end of the year.”

Musk was initially lauded for providing the Starlink terminals to Ukraine, but according to the SpaceX letter, the vast majority were partially or fully funded by other parties, including the U.S. government, the U.K. and Poland. Poland is the largest single contributor and has paid for almost 9,000 terminals, which cost $1,500 and $2,500 for the two models sent to Ukraine, according to the documents.

Those governments also paid for a third of the internet connectivity while SpaceX funded the rest, making up the more expensive part of the bill, according to SpaceX.

Among the documents seen by CNN is also a request from Ukrainian General Valeriy Zaluzhnyi to SpaceX for almost 8,000 more Starlink terminals. SpaceX reportedly responded by recommending the request be sent to the U.S. Department of Defense.

The spat comes shortly after recent reports of Starlink outages, which have disrupted crucial Ukrainian military communication on the front lines.