Monday, January 20, 2025

‘Our mission’: Auschwitz museum staff recount their everyday jobs


By AFP
January 19, 2025


'It's impossible to leave all the history behind and not take it home with you,' says guide Jacek Paluch - Copyright the Hostages Families Forum Headquarters/AFP -, Ahmad GHARABLI

Bernard OSSER

Barbed wire lines the road to work for Pawel Sawicki, deputy spokesman of the Auschwitz museum at the site of the former Nazi death camp that was liberated 80 years ago this month.

More than one million people died at the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp built by Nazi Germany when it occupied Poland in World War II — most of them Jews, but also non-Jewish Poles, Roma and Soviet soldiers.

Around 850 people work at the museum to preserve their memory, a job with more emotional baggage than your usual nine-to-five.

“They say that when you start working here, either you leave very quickly because the history is too much or you stay for a long time,” said Sawicki, who is in charge of social media at the museum and has worked there for 17 years.

“It helps if you find some meaning to the mission,” the 44-year-old told AFP.

Sawicki’s office is located inside a former hospital for the Nazis’ notorious SS.

Behind the building there is an old gas chamber and farther on stands the camp’s “Arbeit Macht Frei” (Work Will Set You Free) gate.

To cope with the heavy emotional toll of working at Auschwitz, Sawicki said he has put up “a sort of professional barrier” that keeps him sane, even if it cracks from time to time.



– Not a word –



Jacek Paluch, a longtime Auschwitz tour guide, said he makes sure to leave his “work at work” to avoid going crazy.

“But it’s a special job, and a special place. It’s impossible to leave all the history behind and not take it home with you,” he told AFP.

The 60-year-old said he leads up to 400 groups of visitors each year around the former death factory.

More than 1.8 million people from across the world visited Auschwitz last year.

The museum offers tours of the site in more than 20 languages, led by around 350 guides.

The hardest, most emotional moments for Paluch are his encounters with former prisoners.

Once, Paluch came across a man sitting silently — and unresponsive to questions — on a bench, his arm tattooed with his former inmate number.

“His whole life, he never spoke a word to his family about what had happened here. Then, suddenly, at one Sunday breakfast, he began to talk,” Paluch said.

“They stopped him and took him here so that he could tell his story where it happened,” he continued.

“But when he walked through the ‘Arbeit Macht Frei’ gate, the memories came back. He went quiet again and no longer wanted to talk about any of it.”



– ‘Importance as evidence’ –



Paluch said he knows when the job has taken its toll.

“A sign of fatigue, not necessarily physical but more mental, is when I have dreams at night that I’m leading groups,” he said.

“That’s when I realise I need to take some time off.”

Wanda Witek-Malicka, a historian at the museum’s research centre, had for years focused on child inmates of Auschwitz. But she had to abandon the difficult subject when she became a mother.

“At that moment, this particular aspect of Auschwitz history — children, pregnant women, newborns — I was in no state to handle it,” she told AFP.

“The emotional weight of the site and the history was too much for me,” the 38-year-old added.

Were the museum staff to reflect on the site’s history round the clock “we’d probably be unable to get any work done”.

Elsewhere at the site, conservator Andrzej Jastrzebiowski examined some metal containers once filled with Zyklon B, the poison gas used to kill inmates at Auschwitz.

He recalled his anger early on — he has worked at the museum for 17 years — when he had to conserve objects that had belonged to the Nazis.

“Later, I realised these objects had importance as evidence of the crimes committed here, and maintaining them is also part of our mission here,” the 47-year-old told AFP.



– ‘Give them a voice’ –



Jastrzebiowski and his colleagues at the high-tech conservation department are responsible for preserving hundreds of thousands of items, including shoes, suitcases, metal pots, toothbrushes, letters and documents.

Most of the items had belonged to inmates before being confiscated upon arrival.

The conservators are also responsible for preserving the camp barracks, the barbed wire, and the remnants of the blown up crematoriums and gas chambers and other ruins at the site.

It is work of utmost importance, especially at a time when the number of living former inmates is dwindling fast.

“Soon there will be no more direct witnesses to testify and all that will remain are these items, and they will have to tell the history,” said Jastrzebiowski.

“Our job is to give them a voice.”

When he works on an item, he tries to discover the object’s peculiarities to keep the job from becoming a mindless routine.

“It helps me to think of the items’ owners, their stories,” he told AFP.

“Most of all, it’s the opposite of what the Nazis had wanted — that their memory vanish, that they disappear forever.”







‘We want peace’ say Colombians displaced by fresh guerrilla violence


By AFP
January 19, 2025


Gladis Angarita was among hundreds of people displaced in the latest guerrilla violence to find refuge at a community center in Tibu - Copyright AFP Schneyder Mendoza

Gladis Angarita, 62, fled her village in northeast Colombia in terror last Friday, among thousands escaping a fresh guerrilla onslaught that has claimed dozens of lives in just a few days.

She had no time to pack, escaping with little more than the clothes on her back and her asthma medication.

“There was a lot of shooting,” Angarita told AFP in the town of Tibu, on the border with Venezuela, where she found refuge at a community center with about 500 others — including many children and elderly people.

“Out of fear, we left everything” behind, she lamented, sitting on a log and sucking on her inhaler. “I don’t even have any pajamas.”

Colombia’s National Liberation Army (ELN) — the largest guerrilla group still active in the conflict-riddled South American country — launched a bloody attack last Thursday in the northeastern Catatumbo region.

It targeted civilians and dissident fighters of a rival formation comprised of ex-members of the now-defunct FARC guerrilla force who kept fighting after it disarmed in 2017.

Authorities report at least 80 people killed by Sunday, some two dozen injured and 5,000 displaced in an upheaval reminiscent of the bloody 1990s, when Colombia endured the worst period in its six-decade-old armed conflict.

Nine people were also killed in clashes in recent days between the ELN and the Gulf Clan, Colombia’s biggest drug cartel, in another northern region of the country.

The violence prompted President Gustavo Petro Friday to call off negotiations with the ELN that had been part of his stated quest for “total peace.”



– ‘We want peace’ –



“We want peace!” Angarita said shortly after arriving in Tibu, a town in the Colombian region with the world’s biggest drug plantations, according to the UN.

“The war has to end,” she sighed.

A 2016 peace pact with FARC had sought to end the longest-running war in the Americas.

But leftist guerrillas, right-wing paramilitaries, drug gangs and state forces remain in open conflict in parts of the country as fighting rages over illegal mining and drug resources and trafficking routes.

The ELN, which has roughly 5,800 fighters and a major stake in the drug business, has taken part in failed negotiations with Colombia’s last five governments.

Since 1964, the conflict is estimated to have resulted in some nine million Colombians either killed, disappeared or forced to leave their homes, according to authorities.

Last November, the Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC), a humanitarian organization, said at least 1.5 million people have been displaced since the deal with the FARC in 2016.

– Worse than Venezuela –

On Saturday, Tibu was a hive of frantic activity, its bus terminal bursting with people desperate to flee to other parts of Colombia, or further afield.

“My heart aches for Catatumbo… for the whole country. There are many innocent people paying the price for war,” sobbed Carmelina Perez, also 62, as she used a piece of cardboard to shield herself from the harsh sun.

Perez said she fled with her husband and the grandchildren to Tibu “in panic.” She worries desperately about her daughters who stayed behind in their village.

Around Perez at the shelter, hammocks hang from trees for people to sleep in and children run around while women prepare a collective soup in a large pot over a fire.

Fellow refugee Luis Alberto Urrutia, a 39-year-old Venezuelan, said he had fled the economic and political crisis in his own country seven years ago to work in the coca plantations of Catatumbo.

Now he is on the move again, and contemplating a return home.

“This is more difficult than even in Venezuela,” Urrutia told AFP in Tibu.

“There is danger everywhere, but more even here. There are many dead,” he said of the events of the last few days.
Swiss police clear hundreds of anti-Davos protesters

By AFP
January 19, 2025

Engelhorn, who gave away the bulk of her multi-million fortune, and British millionaire Phil White, joined the protest - Copyright AFP Schneyder Mendoza

Some 300 people including two millionaires protested in Davos Sunday ahead of next week’s gathering of the global elite at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in the Swiss Alps.

Demonstrators carried placards with slogans such as “Tax the rich”, “Shut up! Pay taxes” and “Smash colonial capitalism”, blocking the road to the glitzy mountain resort.

Police moved in after the demonstrators ignored two calls for them to leave, a spokeswoman for the Graubunden cantonal police told the Keystone-ATS news agency.

With the blockade causing a major traffic jam, the authorities deployed a specialised vehicle to clear the highway ahead of the WEF’s Monday start.

Among those attending the protest was Austrian-German heiress Marlene Engelhorn, who gave away the bulk of her multi-million-euro inheritance to dozens of organisations working on social issues.

“The WEF symbolises how much power wealthy people like me hold,” she told AFPTV.

“Because just because we are born millionaires, or because we got lucky once — and call that self-made — we now get to influence politicians worldwide with our political preferences,” she added.

“It’s a huge lobbyism effort. It’s a huge lack of transparency that we witness here, no accountability… I just think we need accountability, we need transparency, we need democracy to be in place here.”

Engelhorn also denounced the pollution being caused by private jets flying in for the summit.

Also at Sunday’s protest was Britain’s Phil White, part of a group called Patriotic Millionaires.

Many observers have expressed concern about the so-called “broligarchy” surrounding US President-elect Donald Trump, which includes billionaire Elon Musk.

Founded in 1971, the WEF offers a yearly opportunity for hundreds of business executives, politicians and other leading figures to mingle in the ski resort-turned-conference centre over the course of a week.

More than 60 heads of state and government will be among those attending this year, according to the WEF.

Top of their minds will be Trump’s imminent return to the White House.

Trump is due to address the forum by videolink on January 23, according to the organisers, just three days after his inauguration Monday for a second term in office.
WELCOME TO DAVO$, BIG SPENDER
Billionaire wealth on the rise, says Oxfam, warning of 'aristocratic oligarchy'

As global elites arrive in Davos for the annual World Economic Forum, the global advocacy group Oxfam reported that billionaires' wealth increased three times faster in 2024 than the previous year, and it warned of an emerging “aristocratic oligarchy” with enormous political clout, primed to profit from Donald Trump’s presidency of the United States.


Issued on: 20/01/2025 / RFI
Climate activists and other protesters at a demonstration against the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, 19 January 2025. © Yves Herman/Reuters

"Trillions are being gifted in inheritance, creating a new aristocratic oligarchy that has immense power in our politics and our economy," Oxfam International said in its traditional annual pre-Davos report on the super rich.

"The crown jewel of this oligarchy is a billionaire president, backed and bought by the world's richest man Elon Musk, running the world's largest economy," said the charity's executive director Amitabh Behar, referring to the Tesla and X owner who helped to bankroll Trump's campaign.

Musk and the world's two other richest men - Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg, whose Meta empire owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp - will be at Trump’s inauguration in Washington Monday, when the World Economic forum kicks off at Davos in the Swiss Alps.

None are expected be among the 3,000 attendees at Davos, where Trump - who attended the forum twice during his first term - will make an online appearance later in the week.

Calls to 'dismantle the new aristocracy'


In its warnings, Oxfam echoed similar language used last week by outgoing US President Joe Biden, who called out an extremely wealthy oligarchy that "literally threatens our entire democracy".

The group called on governments to “dismantle the new aristocracy” through taxes on the richest and the breakups of monopolies, caps on CEO pay, and the regulation of corporations to ensure they pay “living wages” to workers.

Many earned fortunes through investments in 2024, as top tech companies and stock market indexes like the S&P 500 had strong performances, as well as the price of gold and cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin.
Billionaires on the rise

Oxfam’s report, titled "Takers Not Makers", found that billionaire wealth grew three times faster than in 2023, with each billionaire seeing their fortune increase by €1.941 million per day on average.

At least four new billionaires emerged each week in 2024, reaching a total of 2,769.

Three fifths of billionaire wealth comes from inheritance, monopoly power or “crony connections,” the report said, adding that Trump's tax cut plans will only make them richer.

The group also said that five trillionaires will emerge within a decade, increasing its forecast from last year which said only one trillionaire would appear during that time.

(with AFP, AP)



 


New ‘oligarchy’ under fire as elites descend on Davos


By AFP
January 19, 2025


The Swiss Alpine resort hosts the World Economic Forum every winter - Copyright AFP Fabrice COFFRINI
Ali BEKHTAOUI

A leading NGO warned Monday of an emerging “aristocratic oligarchy” with massive political clout and primed to profit from Donald Trump’s presidency, as global elites descend on Davos for their annual confab.

The World Economic Forum kicks off in the Swiss Alpine resort on the same day as the presidential inauguration of Trump, who will not be in Davos but will make an online appearance later in the week.

Global charity Oxfam said in a report that Trump’s election win and tax-cut plans are a boon to billionaires, whose combined wealth already grew by another $2 trillion last year to $15 trillion.

“Trillions are being gifted in inheritance, creating a new aristocratic oligarchy that has immense power in our politics and our economy,” Oxfam said in its traditional annual pre-Davos report on the super rich.

The organisation echoed similar language used last week by outgoing US President Joe Biden, who sounded the alarm about an extremely wealthy oligarchy that “literally threatens our entire democracy”.

Oxfam pointed out that Tesla and X owner Elon Musk helped to bankroll Trump’s campaign.

“The crown jewel of this oligarchy is a billionaire president, backed and bought by the world’s richest man Elon Musk, running the world’s largest economy,” said the charity’s executive director Amitabh Behar.

“We present this report as a stark wake up-call that ordinary people the world over are being crushed by the enormous wealth of a tiny few,” Behar added.

– Five trillionaires –

The report, titled “Takers Not Makers”, found that 204 new billionaires emerged last year — almost four every week — to bring the total to 2,769.

Total billionaire wealth grew three times faster last year than in 2023, each billionaire seeing their fortune increase by $2 million per day on average. And, according to Oxfam, five trillionaires could emerge in a decade.

Trump’s election “gave a huge further boost to billionaire fortunes, while his policies are set to fan the flames of inequality further”, Oxfam said.

In the United States “we are in a situation where you can buy a country, with the risk of weakening democracy”, said the head of Oxfam France, Cecile Duflot.

The world’s three richest men will be at his inauguration: Musk, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg, whose Meta empire owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp.

The tech trio is not expected in Davos, however.

– ‘Tax the rich’ –


Some 3,000 participants are expected at the Swiss ski village for the forum ending Friday — including 60 heads of state or government and more than 900 CEOs — for days of schmoozing and behind-the-scenes dealmaking.

A few hundred protesters blocked an access road to Davos on Sunday, holding banners reading “tax the rich” and “burn the system”, and causing a traffic jam until police dispersed them.

“The WEF symbolises how much power wealthy people like me hold,” said Austrian-German heiress Marlene Engelhorn, who gave away the bulk of her multi-million-euro inheritance to dozens of organisations working on social issues.

“Because just because we are born millionaires, or because we got lucky once — and call that self-made — we now get to influence politicians worldwide with our political preferences,” she told AFP.

While Trump will not be in Davos in person, his presidency will dominate discussions. His plans to impose trade tariffs, loosen regulations, extend tax breaks and curb immigration will have far-reaching effects on the global economy.

He has named hedge fund manager Scott Bessent as his Treasury secretary, while billionaire businessman Howard Lutnick will head the Commerce Department.

Rising inequalities have fuelled debates about imposing a global tax on the super-rich.

“I don’t want to live in a country with a few rich people and lots of poor people,” said Morris Pearl, a former managing director at investment giant BlackRock. He is now a member of Patriotic Millionaires, a group that backs raising taxes on the rich.

“I’m afraid that we’re going to have civil unrest if we don’t change things,” Pearl told AFP.



Think Trump can’t be president after his second term is up in January 2029? Think again.

January 20, 2025



REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo
U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin hold a bilateral meeting at the G20 leaders summit in Osaka, Japan June 28, 2019.

When Donald Trump met with congressional Republicans shortly after his November 2024 election victory, he floated the idea of another term: “I suspect I won’t be running again unless you say, ‘He’s so good we’ve got to figure something else out.’”


At first glance, this seems like an obvious joke. The 22nd Amendment to the Constitution is clear that Trump can’t be elected again. The text of the amendment states:
“No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.”


That amendment was passed in response to Franklin Roosevelt’s four elections to the presidency. Since George Washington had stepped down at the end of his second term, no president had sought a third term, much less a fourth. The amendment was clearly meant to prevent presidents from serving more than two terms in office.
Franklin D. Roosevelt delivers his fourth inaugural address on Jan. 20, 1945.
Abbie Rowe, National Archives and Records Administration. Office of Presidential Libraries. Harry S. Truman Library, via Wikimedia Commons

Because Trump has been elected president twice already, the plain language of the amendment bars him from being elected a third time. Some have argued that since Trump’s terms were nonconsecutive, the amendment doesn’t apply to him. But the amendment makes no distinction between consecutive and nonconsecutive terms in office.

Though the 22nd Amendment prohibits Trump from being elected president again, it does not prohibit him from serving as president beyond Jan. 20, 2029. The reason for this is that the 22nd Amendment only prohibits someone from being “elected” more than twice. It says nothing about someone becoming president in some other way than being elected to the office.
Skirting the rules

There are a few potential alternate scenarios. Under normal circumstances, they would be next to impossible. But Donald Trump has never been a normal president.

On issue after issue, Trump has pushed the outer limits of presidential power. Most importantly, he has already shown his willingness to bend or even break the law to stay in office. And while Trump claims he’s only joking when he floats the idea of a third term, he has a long history of using “jokes” as a way of floating trial balloons.

Furthermore, once he leaves office, Trump could once again face the prospect of criminal prosecution and possibly jail time, further motivating him to stay in power. As Trump’s second term progresses, don’t be surprised if Americans hear more about how he might try to stay in office. Here is what the Constitution says about that prospect.
Other ways to become president

Nine people have served as president without first being elected to that office. John Tyler, Millard Fillmore, Andrew Johnson, Chester Arthur, Theodore Roosevelt, Calvin Coolidge, Harry Truman, Lyndon Johnson and Gerald Ford were all vice presidents who stepped into the office when their predecessors either died or resigned.

The 22nd Amendment does not bar a term-limited president from being elected vice president. On the other hand, the 12th Amendment does state that “no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of the President shall be eligible to that of the Vice-President of the United States.”

It’s not clear whether this restriction applies to a two-term president who is ineligible for a third term because of the 22nd Amendment – or whether it merely imposes on the vice president the Constitution’s other criteria for presidential eligibility, namely that they be a natural-born citizen of the United States, at least 35 years of age and have lived in the U.S. for at least 14 years.

That question would have to be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. Should the justices decide in Trump’s favor – as they have recently on questions regarding the 14th Amendment’s insurrection clause and presidential immunity – then the 2024 ticket of Trump-Vance could become the 2028 Vance-Trump ticket. If elected, Vance could then resign, making Trump president again.

No resignation needed


But Vance would not even have to resign in order for a Vice President Trump to exercise the power of the presidency. The 25th Amendment to the Constitution states that if a president declares that “he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of the office … such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.”

In fact, the U.S. has had three such acting presidents – George H.W. Bush, Dick Cheney and Kamala Harris. All of them held presidential power for a brief period when the sitting president underwent anesthesia during medical procedures; Cheney did it twice.

In this scenario, shortly after taking office on Jan. 20, 2029, President Vance could invoke the 25th Amendment by notifying the speaker of the House and the president pro tempore of the Senate that he is unable to discharge the duties of president. He would not need to give any reason or proof of this incapacity.

Vice President Trump would then become acting president and assume the powers of the presidency until such time as President Vance issued a new notification indicating that he was able to resume his duties as president.

‘Tandemocracy’

But exercising the power of the presidency doesn’t even necessarily require being president or acting president.

Trump has repeatedly expressed his admiration for autocratic Russian President Vladimir Putin, so he might want to follow the example of the Medvedev-Putin “tandemocracy.”


Russian leaders Vladimir Putin, left, and Dmitry Medvedev have collaborated to hold power for more than a quarter-century, despite laws imposing term limits or other restrictions. Mikhail Svetlov/Getty Images


In 2008, term limits in the Russian constitution prevented Putin from running for president after two consecutive terms. Instead, he selected a loyal subordinate, Dmitry Medvedev, to run for president.

When elected, Medvedev appointed Putin as his prime minister. By most accounts, Putin remained firmly in power and made most of the important decisions. Following this example, a future Republican president could appoint Trump to an executive branch position from which he could still exercise power.

In 2012, Putin was able to run for president again, and he and Medvedev once again swapped roles. Since then, Putin has succeeded in amending the Russian Constitution to effectively allow him to remain president for the rest of his life.
Using a figurehead

Then again, Trump might just want to avoid all of these legal subterfuges by following the example of George and Lurleen Wallace. In 1966, the Alabama Constitution prevented Wallace from running for a third consecutive term as governor. Still immensely popular and unwilling to give up power, Wallace chose to have his wife, Lurleen, run for governor. It was clear from the beginning that Lurleen was just a figurehead for George, who promised to be an adviser to his wife, at a salary of $1 a year.

The campaign’s slogan of “Two Governors, One Cause,” made it clear that a vote for Lurleen was really a vote for George.

Lurleen won in a landslide.

According to one account of her time in office, the Wallaces had “something of a Queen-Prime Minister relationship: Mrs. Wallace handles the ceremonial and formal duties of state. Mr. Wallace draws the grand outlines of state policy and sees that it is carried out.”

Trump’s wife was not born a U.S. citizen and therefore isn’t eligible to be president. But as the head of the Republican Party, Trump could ensure that the next GOP presidential candidate was a member of his family or some other person who would be absolutely loyal and obedient to him. If that person went on to win the White House in 2028, Trump could serve as an unofficial adviser, allowing him to continue to wield the power of the presidency without the actual title.

Philip Klinkner, James S. Sherman Professor of Government, Hamilton College

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Inside Trump's $200 million exercise in legalized bribery




OPINION
Joe Conason
ALTERNET
January 19, 2025

Legalized bribery is still bribery -- and there is no other way to describe the celebration that marks the second presidential inauguration of Donald Trump.

With the menacing manner of a mob boss, Trump has extorted million-dollar contributions from dozens of corporations that fear federal retribution against their shareholders or management (as in the case of Meta boss Mark Zuckerberg, who coughed up his million after Trump literally threatened him with "life in prison" not so long ago).

No doubt many of the corporate and billionaire donors are keen to prove their loyalty to a new administration that promises to uphold their interests. They know better than to worry about Republican proclamations that their party now represents "working class" Americans. Nobody who has glanced at Project 2025 or read Elon Musk's posts could harbor any such illusions -- and surely the inaugural donors from outfits such as General Motors, the pharmaceutical lobby, Pratt Industries, Uber, Amazon and Microsoft do not.

Many of the corporations currently greasing Trump withheld donations from his 2016 festivities, apparently repelled by the racism, misogyny and propensity for violence he had flaunted during the campaign. Some combination of fear and greed has overcome any such scruples this year.

Ralph Nader's Public Citizen, a nonprofit that monitors corporate influence, is tracking the payments of tribute, and even its jaded staffers are shocked by the Trump inaugural's brazen style. Said Craig Holman, a government ethics expert at the Nader group: "The record-breaking cesspool of special interest financing for the Trump-Vance Inaugural Committee raises serious concerns about the ability of corporations and wealthy special interests to purchase influence over public policy or lucrative government contracts."

Estimates of the amount that the presidential inauguration committee will collect from both eager and reluctant donors range up to $200 million, a record sum certain to prompt boasting from Trump and his minions. Impressive though it is, the inaugural hoard only represents a down payment on what portends to be four years of unprecedented and gluttonous corruption.

If you wonder why Trump needs $200 million for this little event, so does everyone who ever ran a prior inauguration. Due to frigid weather in Washington, the 47th president will take the oath of office indoors at a ceremony paid for by the taxpayers. Then the Trump-Vance committee will host only three inaugural balls -- a tiny schedule compared with the number of balls held by his predecessors -- plus a few events at his Trump National Golf Club, miles from the capital.

In other words, they're spending almost none of that big haul.

Yet while the actual expense of parties and fireworks will be nominal, the opportunities for grift are vast. As in so many instances during Trump's first presidency, those golf club events are siphoning big money from the inaugural fund into his business accounts.

The Trumps ran the same kind of scam eight years ago, when the 2016 inaugural committee inked massively overpriced contracts for rooms and services purchased from the Trump hotel in Washington. That pattern continued during his administration, with big profits booked from taxpayers footing hotel and resort bills for Secret Service agents protecting Trump and his family.

Where will all the money go? In 2017, the Trump inaugural raised $107 million, a total far in excess of what the committee spent on its events. The committee -- whose top staff included notorious crooks Rick Gates and Elliot Broidy -- never presented any accounting of its expenditures, let alone an audit. Tens of millions of dollars simply disappeared.

The official story is that funds not spent on this week's inaugural will be transferred to the newly formed Donald J. Trump Presidential Library Fund Inc. -- with the supposed purpose of establishing a repository and museum memorializing his presidency.

Maybe that will happen someday. But the sordid history of the Trump Foundation, ordered to shut down after the New York state attorney general proved its myriad abuses, showed that the Trumps are familiar with every trick for stealing from a nonprofit. The likelihood is that most or all of the tainted inaugural lucre will wind up in their pockets.

Day One won't see a peace agreement between Ukraine and Russia, a drop in grocery prices, or anything else that Trump promised during his campaign. The customary grifting will resume promptly, however. In fact, it has already begun.



It's time to wake up: The GOP isn't interested in democracy
AlterNet
January 20, 2025 



There’s no compromising with evil, although some Democrats apparently think they can. Evil, by its very nature, will always win in such situations, even when it appears to have compromised or cooperated.

“Evil” is defined by the Oxford Dictionary as “a force that causes bad things to happen.”

In a democracy—derived from the Greek root demos, meaning “the people”—the core principle is governance that serves the collective well-being of its citizens. When decisions or actions prioritize the interests of a small, privileged group or industry over the needs of the majority, they undermine this principle.

Such actions can be rightly viewed as “a force that causes bad things to happen” for the broader population, eroding trust and equality within the system. Evil, in other words.

Today’s Republican Party is now fully in the service of:

— The fossil fuel industry, which is threatening all life on Earth and just this week helped light Los Angeles on fire.

— The for-profit health insurance industry, which is (according to The Lancet) responsible for over 65,000 Americans dying unnecessarily every year.
— A group of rightwing billionaires who appear committed to replacing American democracy with oligarchy, which, as noted before, eventually morphs into tyranny.
— The gun industry, responsible for terrorizing and psychologically scarring our nation’s schoolchildren with active shooter drills, not to mention the highest gun homicide rate in the developed world.

— For-profit movements to end/privatize public school and keep college unaffordable.
— An investment industry financializing housing, which has caused a crisis of affordability and widespread homelessness.
— The predators in the banking industry who crashed our economy on George W. Bush’s watch and then walked away with hundreds of billions in taxpayer money.

The list, of course, goes on (including the GOP’s loyalty to the military/industrial complex and Putin), but the point is that all of these portend such dramatically terrible consequences for average Americans that they could realistically be termed “evil.”

And now a few Democrats apparently think they can “compromise” with these proudly in-the-service-of-evil people. It’s a terrible mistake.

Take the Laken Riley Act. It contains a provision that would give Trump the power to detain any undocumented immigrant in America who’s accused of a crime, including such minor crimes as shoplifting, with life imprisonment.













As Michelle Goldberg wrote this week for The New York Times:

“It mandates federal detention without bail for migrants who are merely arrested for any theft-related crimes, with no provision to free them if the charges are later dropped. …
“The bill applies to many immigrants who are authorized to be here, including Dreamers and those with temporary protected status. And the legislation contains no exemption for minors. As Ilya Somin, a law professor at George Mason University, told me, the Laken Riley Act could mandate the indefinite detention of a juvenile child of asylum-seekers arrested for swiping a candy bar, even if he or she didn’t do it.”

And yet John Fetterman and Ruben Gallego — who both ran for office as principled progressives — have jumped on board, co-sponsoring the legislation.

Presumably they haven’t done their homework, which is problematic itself, but they also should have known that any legislation that includes explicit attacks on President Biden (“victims of the Biden administration’s open borders policies”) as part of its original language is a GOP stalking horse.

You can’t compromise with evil.


That’s not to say that Democrats and Republicans can’t have interests that overlap where they can work together.

But this illustrates the very real danger of collaborating with people who are not operating in good faith, and whose allegiance is to billionaires and predators instead of to their constituents and the people of the United States. Who will do or say just about anything to please their funders and/or Donald Trump.

Like yesterday when Mike Johnson, whose state got $1.7 billion in federal aid to deal with Hurricanes Laura, Delta, and Ida, just told CNN that if California — which Trump hates, and whose governor he wants to prevent from ever becoming president — wants disaster aid:

“I think there should be conditions on that aid.”

Historically, disasters brought Americans together. It’s a human instinct, among normal people, to reach out to care for other humans in crisis.

But not with Trump and today’s GOP: they are absolutely set on exploiting this climate-change-driven disaster in California to destroy Democrats. Trump is leading the charge, and elected Republicans and rightwing media are enthusiastically jumping on board.

And for some inexplicable reason, outside of Gavin Newsome, most Democrats are not aggressively fighting back. They should instead be using his and the GOP’s outrageous efforts to exploit this disaster to hammer them.

As Steve Schmidt wrote in his The Warning newsletter:

“Being nice to Trump means being capitulant. When it comes to kneeling in front of the man whom Scarborough called Hitler, there is nothing civil about it. In fact, it is as indecent an act as there is.”

The preeminent advantage evil people have when they go into politics, after all, is their willingness and ability to lie without compunction. Trump is the master at it, and now it’s demanded of every Republican every time they show up on a Sunday show.

Normal humans always want to give the benefit of the doubt, to trust others, to assume the best, and evil liars actively exploit this for their own gain.

Like when Republicans said that cutting taxes on billionaires will help average people, that a national healthcare system and free college won’t work in America, that more guns means less violence, or that Iraq played a role in 9/11 and had weapons of mass destruction.


Or look at how Trump has endorsed Putin’s attack on Ukraine and Xi’s designs on Taiwan — complete violations of the post-WWII rules-based-order — by proclaiming that America would consider using military force to annex Panama and/or Greenland.

We’re already seeing the evil that Republicans have embraced this new year being actively normalized by our media; yesterday’s Senate hearings with Pete Hegseth were a great example. In any other era, any other incoming administration in American history, a man who broke trust with three wives and was repeatedly accused of drunkenness on the job wouldn’t get past the first interview and would shock the press.

But this incoming administration is being run by a man with 34 felony convictions, a credible allegation of rape, who himself cheated on each of his three wives just like Hegseth allegedly did. Evil, it turns out, flows from the top down.

Next up, to fund their tax cuts for billionaires, Republicans will most likely attach a debt-ceiling suspension or increase to must-pass legislation favored by Democrats or disaster aid. And if it’s held up by principled opposition, the media will probably bow to Republican framing, blaming Democrats.

The next two years are going to be very dangerous for Democratic legislators. They’ll be wined and dined by evil people, threatened and vilified if they don’t cave in, and praised in the media when they do.

Billionaires and their agents will reach out to some the way they did with Kyrsten Sinema, and a few Democratic senators will probably fall under their sway. It looks like John Fetterman is already leaning in that direction.

They need to remember Winston Churchill’s sage advice:
"You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life."

Evil never surrenders: It’s time to stand up and fight.




'One million percent totally insane': Critics pan Trump's second inaugural speech

Sarah K. Burris
January 20, 2025 
RAW STORY

Donald Trump (Reuters)

Donald Trump's inauguration speech was an outright insult both to the American people and the English language, as critics online painted it.


CNN commentator Maria Cardona weighed in on Trump's claim that California's wildfires were being allowed to spread “without even a token of defense.”

"What an insult to all the amazing firefighters who put their lives on the line to bring the LA fires under control! Trump starts out with a speech filled with massive lies, deceit, insults as he trashes the country to uplift his own deviance," she said on 

AFJustice editor Zack Ford, on the other hand, pointed out some of the speech's grammatical errors and observed that "I don't think you can be 'far more exceptional.'"

He also noted Trump's ongoing ignorance about what "asylum" means. Trump has long believed that those seeking asylum are also those who come from insane asylums and are being sent to the U.S. Applying for asylum is a legal distinction for those leaving their countries under fear of persecution and under fears of serious human rights violations. They are refugees before the international community has recognized them as such, explained Amnesty International.

"Even in his scripted inauguration speech (Stephen Miller-written?), Trump is pushing the inane idea that asylum-seekers are coming from mental asylums," commented former MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan.

New York Times reporter Glenn Thrush noted Trump is already preparing to take credit for former President Joe Biden's work, "Many of the crises Trump has vowed to address (taming inflation, ridding cities of violent crime, building the world's most formidable military...) are already well on the way to be solved..."

CNN's Jim Acosta mentioned Trump's announcement the United States would take back the Panama Canal, and he wondered if this meant a war with Panama.

Reporter James Fallows called this Panama obsession "one million percent total insane bull s--t."

Mother Jones' Washington Bureau chief David Corn referred to the irony of Trump invoking "law and order" while speaking "in the spot where his violent brownshirts, incited by his lies, brutally assaulted law enforcement officers and injured 140 cops. It’s nuts."

Yale Law School professor Scott Shapiro saw one inaugural photo of Trump pointing to Chief Justice John Roberts while shaking his hand. “Thanks Judge for the permission to commit crimes," Shapiro imagined Trump saying.


'I'm in hell': Rolling Stone reporter unloads after being forced to cover Trump rally

Travis Gettys
January 20, 2025 
RAW STORY

A magazine reporter assigned to cover Donald Trump's pre-inauguration "victory rally" had an intrusive thought that plagued him throughout the event.

Asawin Suebsaeng, a senior political reporter for Rolling Stone, attended the twice-impeached convicted felon president's rally Sunday at Capital One Arena in Washington, D.C., and he found that he kept involuntarily scribbling “this is hell, we live in hell, I’m in Hell”over and over.

"The jubilant Village People aside, this is a scenario that we were raised and taught in our schools to believe was not practically or legally possible in our time," Suebsaeng wrote. "This is, we were assured at school, something that occurs in Europe, especially in bygone decades of empire, world wars, and global cold war. Maybe it’s something that unfolds during the democratic backsliding of Latin American nations, particularly the poorer ones. The Middle East. The Philippines. Other places we can’t locate on a map without cheating or a hint, and in countries and regions we can barely deign to pronounce correctly."

"Not here," he added. "At least that’s what we were told again, and again, and again, and then again."

Given what Trump did in his final year in office during his first term, Suebsaeng wrote, a second term should have been unimaginable.

"Openly working to steal a presidential election you lost and then causing American civilians to die in the process was once considered universally, permanently disqualifying in modern America," Suebsaeng wrote. "Now? What can you do but laugh. It’s clear to everyone willing to honestly examine the thought that the American ideal came with a massive and unspoken asterisk. From now until the end of time, we will never not be the country that allowed the host of Celebrity Apprentice to bring us to the brink of democratic and constitutional hemorrhage."

Trump and his team boasts that he mounted the “greatest political comeback” in American history, a claim that disgusts Suebsaeng.

"They are not entirely wrong — though there is a casual depravity to talking about it, like it’s part of a Friends-replacement TV show that Trump used to star on, instead of the abomination that it is," Suebsaeng wrote. "But no matter how venal or fascistic Trump is, he was never the sole author of this violent tragicomedy that we’ve endured for a decade, and will continue to endure for years. One morally vacant aristocrat could not have accomplished today on his own."

Trump's comeback is the result of a collapse and failure by every major institution, the reporter wrote.

"This is all happening because everyone — every one — who was supposed to protect the American people from this failed in the most miserable, unforgivable ways," Suebsaeng wrote. "It was a catastrophic top-to-bottom failure that many millions of people at home and abroad will be living with, now and long after Trump is no longer leader of a nominally free world. Every institution you may have believed had value revealed itself to be for-sale or out-to-lunch."


Trump rages about Hannibal Lecter and 'transgender insanity' as he warns of executive order


REUTERS/Carlos Barria
Donald Trump, JD Vance and his wife Usha Vance attend a service at St. John's Church on the inauguration day of his second Presidential term in Washington, U.S. January 20, 2025.

January 20, 2025

WASHINGTON — President-elect Donald Trump rallied a packed arena Sunday in the nation’s capital ahead of his inauguration Monday, heralding an era of “the Trump effect” and vowing to “act with historic speed and strength and fix every single crisis facing our country.”

Shortly after his swearing-in, Trump is expected to issue pardons for rioters who attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, who he said are “J6 hostages.” Trump also plans a barrage of executive orders curtailing immigration and undoing President Joe Biden’s energy policies

The victory rally, streamed live on C-SPAN from the Capital One Arena in downtown Washington, D.C., featured live music from Kid Rock, Lee Greenwood and, at the conclusion, a surreal performance of the 1978 disco hit “YMCA” by the Village People, as Trump danced along with them. Trump often played the song at his campaign rallies.

Assorted incoming administration officials and celebrities delivered speeches that railed against transgender people, DEI initiatives and immigration at the U.S. southern border. Vice President-elect J.D. Vance was not among the speakers.

Trump spoke for just over an hour, repeating his campaign trail themes about fictional cannibal Hannibal Lecter, SpaceX rockets, an “invasion” of migrants and “transgender insanity.”

He also promised to declassify records related to the assassinations of John F. Kennedy and Robert Kennedy, and claimed that Apple CEO Tim Cook told him Sunday about “a massive investment in the United States because of our big election win.”

“I’m thrilled to be back with so many friends, supporters and true American patriots on the eve of taking back our country,” Trump told a cheering crowd in the arena, which has a capacity of about 20,000.

On Monday it will also host Trump supporters who held tickets to sit in the audience at the Capitol before the ceremony was moved inside due to forecasts of low temperatures, as well as an inauguration parade on Monday afternoon.

Trump touted the return Sunday of the popular app TikTok and the “epic ceasefire agreement” between Israel and Hamas.

The incoming president said war in the Middle East would not have happened had the 2020 election not been “rigged” — a false claim he’s repeated over the last four years.

Trump and Vance will be sworn in Monday indoors in the Capitol rotunda. The four-year term for Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris ends at noon, as stipulated in the Constitution’s 20th Amendment.

Emergency declaration

Among the executive orders Trump plans will be an emergency declaration on the U.S.-Mexico border, the Wall Street Journal reported Sunday.

“You’re going to see executive orders that are going to make you extremely happy, lots of them,” he told rallygoers. “By the time the sun sets tomorrow evening, the invasion of our borders will have come to a halt.”

Trump later told the crowd: “Somebody said yesterday, ‘Sir, don’t sign so many in one day. Let’s do it over a period of weeks.’ I said, ‘Like hell we’re going to do it over weeks.’”

Also on his list of day-one executive orders is extending the deadline for TikTok to find a new owner, a mandate set forth in a bipartisan law last year. Without an extension, companies that distribute or maintain TikTok will face fines up to $5,000 per user on the popular video platform app.

The order will “confirm that there will be no liability for any company that helped keep TikTok from going dark before my order,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform hours ahead of the rally.

TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew was expected to sit on the dais Monday during Trump’s inauguration, but seating arrangements for the indoor ceremony remained unclear.

Trump invited tech billionaire Elon Musk to the stage with him Sunday. The mogul he’s tasked with making recommendations to cut trillions in federal spending told the crowd “we’re looking forward to making a lot of changes.”

Speakers vilify ‘radical left,’ Harris


A parade of speakers introduced the president-elect. Trump’s son Eric, standing alongside his wife Lara and their two children, declared “The bulls--- ends right now.”

Stephen Miller, incoming White House deputy chief of staff for policy, touted “ending the border invasion, sending the illegals home and taking America back,” and ridding children’s playgrounds of “piles of needles.”

Miller denied the very existence of transgender people.

“We’re not going to let the radical left indoctrinate our children into believing there’s 435 genders because President Trump knows there are men and there are women, and it is not up to you whether you’re a man or a woman. That’s a decision that’s made by God, and it can’t be changed,” Miller said.

There are an estimated 2 million transgender people in the U.S., according to the Human Rights Campaign. Gender dysphoria — defined as psychological distress resulting from incongruence between one’s sex assigned at birth and current gender identity — is widely recognized by the medical community. Transgender youth experience disparate health outcomes and increased stigmatization and suicidal behavior, according to a 2024 report published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Right-wing media personality Megyn Kelly delivered remarks during which for several minutes she slammed singer and actress Jennifer Lopez and media magnate Oprah Winfrey for their support of Harris during the 2024 election.

“But of course the fakest person involved on that side of the aisle was the woman at the top, Kamala Harris herself,” Kelly said.

The former Fox News host said the vice president used a “fake Jamaican accent, her fake Eastern European accent, her fake Spanish accent. It was like spending the day at Joe Biden’s southern border nonstop, right?”

Similar criticisms were made repeatedly by Republicans during the campaign and a Fox News reporter in September pressed White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre about Harris’ accent. “The question is just insane,” said Jean-Pierre, saying Americans cared more about the economy, health care and lowering costs, HuffPost reported.
Jab at media

The rally kicked off with a prayer from a duo dubbed “Girls Gone Bible” followed moments later by a musical set from Kid Rock.

In a video message to his “rock ‘n roll patriots,” Trump told the crowd “Let’s make America rock again” as Kid Rock launched into his new song “We the People” that featured the chorus line “Let’s Go Brandon.” “Brandon” was the name used by Trump supporters to insult Biden.

While performing his 1999 hit “Bawitdaba,” Kid Rock ad-libbed “The mainstream media can suck my” — without finishing the sentence.

Prior to the rally, Trump and Vance participated in a wreath-laying ceremony at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier at Arlington National Cemetery. They also visited three graves of servicemembers who were killed in the 2021 U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Several of Trump’s Cabinet nominees attended the ceremony, including Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, who’s been tapped as secretary of state; Fox News TV host Pete Hegseth, the nominee for secretary of defense; and current and former U.S. representatives Elise Stefanik and Tulsi Gabbard, nominees for ambassador to the United Nations and director of national intelligence.

Last updated 9:13 p.m., Jan. 19, 2025

New Jersey Monitor is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. New Jersey Monitor maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Terrence T. McDonald for questions: info@newjerseymonitor.com
'WTF?' World reacts to Trump’s vow of US expansionism


Donald Trump’s son, Donald Jr (second right), visits Greenland in January 2025. AP/Alamy

Brett Wilkins
Common Dreams
January 21, 2025

While the global far-right cheered President Donald Trump's return to the White House on Monday, world leaders, elected officials, activists, and others from across the rest of the political spectrum reacted with trepidation as the Republican vowed to expand the nation's territory for the first time in nearly 80 years and threatened the sovereignty of a U.S. trade and security partner.

In his second inaugural addressTrump promised a foreign policy that "expands our territory," as well as the renewed pursuit of "Manifest Destiny"—the 19th-century belief that God intended the United States to control the continent from coast to coast—beyond Earth by "launching American astronauts to plant the stars and stripes on the planet Mars."

In the United States, Monday's inauguration coincided with the federal holiday honoring the assassinated civil rights champion Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., whom Trump mentioned in his speech. Some observers noted the incongruity of Trump's message with King's anti-war ethos.

"How dare Donald Trump invoke Dr. King," pan-African studies professor and Black Lives Matter Los Angeles co-founder Melina Abdullah fumed on social media. "Trump IS the embodiment of the three evils that MLK warned of: racism, materialism, and militarism."

Indigenous voices reminded listeners that belief in Manifest Destiny fueled genocidal violence against Native Americans.


"Trump is really going after Native Americans with references to Manifest Destiny, the frontier, Wild West, and erasing Denali's name," attorney Brett Chapman, a direct descendant of the Ponca Cshief White Eagle, said on social media. "This anti-Indigenous inaugural address sounds like one from the 1800s when presidents deployed the U.S. military on Native Americans seeking rights."

In his speech, Trump falsely accused China of "running the Panama Canal," said that Panama—which was last invaded by American forces in 1989—is overcharging U.S. ships to use the crucial waterway, and warned that "we're taking it back."

As angry demonstrators rallied outside the U.S. Embassy in Panama City, right-wing Panamanian President José Raúl Mulino issued a statement refuting Trump's threats and accusations and declaring that "the canal is and will continue to be Panamanian."



Trump's threat follows his refusal earlier this month to rule out the use of military force in order to conquer the Panama Canal or Greenland, a territory of NATO ally Denmark.

South American progressives were left stunned by parts of Trump's address.

"In his inauguration speech, Donald Trump made it clear that reality surpasses fiction," Carol Dartora, a leftist lawmaker in the lower chamber of Brazil's National Congress, said in a video posted online. "Then the U.S. president exuded machismo, imperialism, and xenophobia, especially against immigrants."

Across the Atlantic, former center-right Swedish Prime Minister Carl Bildt said: "Now we know that President Trump wants to 'expand our territory.' That's a dangerous statement in itself, but then others around the world might also be inspired to do the same. It's a recipe for global instability."German author, filmmaker, and journalist Annette Dittert responded to Trump's expansionist pledge with a popular three-letter internet acronym: "'We will become a nation that expands our territory?' WTF?"

Trump vows US ‘taking back’ Panama Canal despite ‘peacemaker’ pledge


By AFP
January 20, 2025

US President Donald Trump took aim at Panama in his inaugural address
 - Copyright POOL/AFP SAUL LOEB

Shaun TANDON

President Donald Trump on Monday cast himself as a peacemaker in his second inaugural address, but immediately vowed that the United States would be “taking back” the Panama Canal.

Trump issued the threat without explaining details after weeks of refusing to rule out military action against Panama over the waterway, which the United States handed over at the end of 1999.

“Above all, China is operating the Panama Canal, and we didn’t give it to China, we gave it to Panama. And we’re taking it back,” Trump said after being sworn in inside the US Capitol.

Panama maintains control of the canal but Chinese companies have been steadily increasing their presence around the vital shipping link between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.

Panamanian President Jose Raul Mulino swiftly denied that any other nation was interfering in the canal, which he said his country operated with a principle of neutrality.

“The canal is and will remain Panama’s,” Mulino said, calling for dialogue to address any issues.

At his inauguration, Trump said that the United States has been “treated very badly from this foolish gift that should have never been made.”

“The purpose of our deal and the spirit of our treaty has been totally violated. American ships are being severely overcharged and not treated fairly in any way, shape or form, and that includes the United States Navy,” he said.

Marco Rubio, Trump’s choice for secretary of state, stopped short of threatening military action during his confirmation hearing last week but warned that China through its influence could effectively shut down the Panama Canal to the United States in a crisis.

“This is a legitimate issue that needs to be confronted,” Rubio said.

Trump has also not ruled out force to seize Greenland, an autonomous territory of NATO ally Denmark where Russia has been increasingly active as ice melts due to climate change.

The Panama Canal was built by the United States mostly with Afro-Caribbean labor and opened in 1914.

Former US president Jimmy Carter, who died last month, negotiated its return in 1977, saying he saw a moral responsibility to respect a less powerful but fully sovereign nation.


– ‘Peacemaker and unifier’ –

Trump pledged an “America First” policy of prioritizing US interests above all else. He has put a focus on cracking down on undocumented immigration and said he will deploy the military to the border with Mexico.

But Trump also cast himself as a peacemaker and pointed to a Gaza ceasefire deal whose implementation began Sunday.

“My proudest legacy will be that of a peacemaker and unifier. That’s what I want to be — a peacemaker and a unifier,” he said.

The Gaza ceasefire, which includes an exchange of hostages and prisoners, follows the outlines of a proposal outlined in May by then-president Joe Biden, but it was pushed through after intensive last-minute diplomacy by envoys of both Biden and Trump.

Trump has also promised to end the war in Ukraine by pushing for compromises — a contrast to Biden’s approach of supporting Kyiv to a potential military victory.

Despite Trump’s vow to be a unifier, he immediately fired a symbolic but provocative shot above the bow to Mexico.

He said in his address that the United States would start referring to the Gulf of Mexico as the “Gulf of America” — making the water body the latest in the world whose name is disputed between neighbors.

“America will reclaim its rightful place as the greatest, most powerful, most respected nation on Earth, inspiring the awe and admiration of the entire world,” Trump said.


Hillary Clinton can't stop herself from laughing at Trump during inauguration speech

Jennifer Bowers Bahney
January 20, 2025
RAW STORY

Hillary Clinton laughing (Krista Kennell / Shutterstock.com)
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton couldn't help but laugh when Donald Trump said that he was signing an executive order to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.

Trump made the vow during his inaugural address inside the Capitol on Monday.

"America will reclaim its rightful place as the greatest, most powerful, most respected nation on earth inspiring the awe, admiration of the entire world" Trump said during his inauguration speech. "A short time from now, we will be changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America and we will be restoring the name of a great president, William McKinley, to Mount McKinley, where it should be and where it belongs."

Clinton can be seen giggling to herself while keeping her eyes lowered. No one around her seemed to notice.

CBS News reported, "During the transition, Mr. Trump had vowed to rename the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene said last week that she would direct her staff to draft legislation for the renaming that would make it effective on federal maps and administrative policy. While the name change could be applied for federal references, other nations would have no obligation to follow suit."

According to the U.S. State Department, the Gulf of Mexico is officially split between the U.S. and Mexico beginning at the center of the mouth of the Rio Grande, with the U.S. having "maritime jurisdiction" over its portion and Mexico having jurisdiction over its portion.

Earlier in the day Trump fans watching the inauguration on screens at the Capital One arena loudly booed and chanted, "Lock her up!" as Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, took their seats at the Capitol.

Trump started the "Lock her up!" chants when he ran against Clinton — whom he called "Crooked Hillary" — for the presidency in 2016.


 Ron Johnson 'totally supportive' as MAGA economist calls to rename Greenland to Trumpland

RAW STORY
January 20, 2025 

U.S. Senate/screen grab
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) said he was "totally supportive" of purchasing Greenland after MAGA economist Stephen Moore suggested renaming the autonomous territory of the Kingdom of Denmark to "Trumpland."

During a Sunday "Inaugural 2025" discussion of Trumpenomics 2.0 sponsored by Moore's Unleash Prosperity think tank, the economist presented a map with "Trumpland" in place of Greenland. The map also featured the "Gulf of America" for the Gulf of Mexico and named Canada the 51st state. Mexico was called "The Other Side of the Wall."

"This is the map of what the United States might look like. And I want to get serious.," Moore announced. "By the way, I don't think we should call it Greenland anymore. It should be called Trumpland, right?


"What do you think about the idea of the United States purchasing Greenland?" he asked.

"Well, first, I understand the strategic importance of both Greenland and the Panama Canal," Johnson replied. "So I know the mainstream media, or legacy media, is criticizing and ridiculing Trump for it. It's not insane by any stretch of imagination."


"So if we can do a good deal of Greenland, I'd be totally supportive of it," he added.