Monday, July 28, 2025

In a First, NRC Approves Restart of Mothballed Nuclear Facility

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission on Thursday granted multiple licensing and regulatory approvals necessary for the 800-MW Palisades nuclear plant in Michigan to restart operations later this year.

Palisades is now authorized to receive new fuel and formally transition licensed reactor operators to on-shift status, Holtec International said in a statement. The company is leading the effort to restart the plant.

 

“The NRC’s approval to transition Palisades back to an operating license represents an unprecedented milestone in U.S. nuclear energy,” Holtec President Kelly Trice said. Palisades would be the first U.S. plant to be brought back online after decommissioning.

NRC noted that there are still several licensing actions under review “and additional requirements that need to be met before the plant can start up under the original operating license, which would expire March 24, 2031.”

The nuclear regulator also said it has approved the transfer of operating authority for the plant and its independent spent fuel storage facility from Holtec Decommissioning International to Palisades Energy. And, it approved Holtec’s request to reinstate various documents and programs that were in place prior to shut down.

In May, NRC concluded Holtec’s efforts to restart the plant pose “no significant impact” to the human environment, a key finding in the effort to restart the facility.

Entergy, the former owner of Palisades, shuttered the plant in May 2022 and sold it to Holtec the following month. Holtec made the first public moves toward restarting the plant in late 2023. As electricity demand has begun to rise, owners of two other recently-shuttered U.S. nuclear power plants have since moved to restart them. 

Backed by a 20-year power purchase agreement with Microsoft, Constellation Energy said in September it will restart the undamaged 835-MW reactor at Three Mile Island — now called the Crane Clean Energy Center — by 2028. And NextEra Energy has taken preliminary steps to restart the 600-MW reactor at its Duane Arnold nuclear plant in Iowa, which shuttered in 2020.

By Robert Walton of Utility Dive


Are Small Modular Reactors Worthy of the Hype?

  • Small modular reactors represent a significant advance in nuclear technology, promising cheaper, safer, and more efficient nuclear capacity expansion.

  • Despite widespread anticipation and significant investment, SMRs face challenges related to high costs and regulatory hurdles.

  • Continued policy support and streamlined regulations are crucial for SMRs to achieve their full potential.

Nuclear energy is experiencing a political and technical renaissance. Around the world, nuclear fission is gaining traction as a critical piece of the puzzle for maintaining energy security while also slashing greenhouse gas emissions. Much of the renewed excitement over nuclear power comes from advances in nuclear technologies, particularly small modular reactors (SMRs), which are supposed to make nuclear capacity expansion cheaper, safer, and more efficient.

SMR is still a broad term, encompassing models with capacities ranging from 1 megawatt to several hundred megawatts. Currently, there are 74 SMR designs under development on a global scale, and there is a lot of variation in their design. But generally speaking, SMRs are much smaller versions of nuclear reactors that are standardized for mass production in factories. They can then be installed on-site. In contrast, traditional nuclear plants are necessarily one-of-a-kind and built according to the specifications of their environment, which leads to massive upfront costs and long project times.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) has identified SMRs as one of the key catalysts for what is shaping up to be “a new era for nuclear energy.” A recent IEA report says that SMRs are increasingly becoming private sector darlings as they are quicker to build and offer many more opportunities for cutting costs than traditional reactors, which could provide a pathway to lower financing costs. The report contends that “with the right support, SMR installations could reach 80 GW by 2040, accounting for 10% of overall nuclear capacity globally.”

This idea of “the right support” is pivotal. We’ve been talking about the massive disruptive potential of SMRs for years now, but they have yet to make the waves that the public and private sectors have been eagerly and vocally anticipating. As a recent Canary Media Report asks: “Small modular reactors are gaining steam globally. Will any get built?

Experts say that one of the primary hangups is simple economics. Costs are still too high to be genuinely competitive with other clean alternatives like large-scale hydropower and offshore wind projects. “A key argument from SMR proponents is that the new reactors will be economically competitive,” says David Schlissel, IEEFA director of resource planning analysis. “But the on-the-ground experience with the initial SMRs that have been built or that are currently under construction shows that this simply is not true.”

Moreover, even though there is an estimated $15 billion in public and private dollars flowing into the SMR sector, the dynamic and varied nature of the nascent technology is causing confusion for investors. “This is both an opportunity and a challenge,” Diane Cameron, leader of NEA’s division of nuclear technology development and economics, told Canary Media ?“There’s a lot going on, and sometimes financiers or regulators and policymakers are wondering where to focus their efforts first.”

This diversity also makes SMRs harder to regulate, causing a major hurdle for streamlining nuclear policy in this “new nuclear era.” And streamlined policy is one of the critical enabling factors for SMR's long-awaited success. According to the IEA’s January report, “In a scenario in which tailored policy support for nuclear and streamlined regulations for SMRs align with robust industry delivery on new projects and designs, SMR capacity is three times higher by mid-century, reaching 120 GW, with more than one thousand SMRs in operation by then.”

Even though there is excitement from investors and policymakers alike, getting SMR models approved is taking much longer than anticipated. Only one model has been approved in the United States, and it is not yet operational. But many, many more designs are waiting in the wings. And as the technologies evolve and begin to be deployed at scale, the economics will change – as will regulatory structures. So, despite the years of delays, we’ll say it again – the SMR revolution is right around the corner. 

By Haley Zaremba for Oilprice.com



World Nuclear News


ENEC signs collaboration deals with Korea, USA


Monday, 28 July 2025
The Emirates Nuclear Energy Company and Hyundai Engineering & Construction are to jointly explore international nuclear energy opportunities. The announcement came days after ENEC signed an agreement with Westinghouse to accelerate the deployment of AP1000 reactors.
ENEC signs collaboration deals with Korea, USA
(Image: Hyundai E&C)

During a visit to Seoul, South Korea, by ENEC management, a memorandum of understanding was signed with Hyundai E&C, which was the lead contractor in the construction of the UAE's four-unit Barakah nuclear power plant. It was signed by Hyundai E&C CEO Lee Han-woo and ENEC Managing Director and CEO Mohamed Al Hammadi.

The MoU provides a comprehensive framework for knowledge sharing, collaborative evaluation of project participation, and assessment of strategic investment opportunities. It also includes the formation of a joint working group to identify areas of mutual interest and support the development of future nuclear energy initiatives.

"The collaboration between ENEC and Hyundai E&C builds on the longstanding strategic partnership between the UAE and the Republic of Korea in the nuclear sector and supports both countries' shared goals to advancing peaceful nuclear energy in line with International Energy Agency and International Atomic Energy Agency projections for a significant global scale-up of nuclear capacity by 2030 and 2050 respectively," ENEC said.

"This MoU is very meaningful in that it provides a practical foundation for seeking cooperation opportunities with ENEC on global nuclear power projects," said a spokesperson from Hyundai E&C. "We will continue to discover new nuclear power plant projects in various regions, including the Middle East, North America, Asia, and Europe, and strengthen our global competitiveness in the future."

ENEC said the MoU with Hyundai E&C demonstrates its "expanding role in international nuclear partnerships to sustaining momentum in nuclear energy development and shaping the future of nuclear energy by enabling faster, safer and more cost-effective deployment of new nuclear technologies in the UAE and globally". 

It noted that the signing of the MoU follows a series of recent agreements between ENEC and leading global operators, technology developers, and energy companies.

"ENEC is pursuing a new phase of investing in, collaborating with and consulting on both large nuclear reactors in addition to advancing new nuclear technologies both locally and internationally," the company said. "With the Barakah Nuclear Energy Plant fully operational, ENEC is now focused on working with global partners to support the acceleration of nuclear deployment and committed to working with all responsible nations looking to deploy new nuclear or expand their existing fleets, and MoUs with companies such as Hyundai E&C are a clear demonstration of this approach."

Westinghouse agreement

Last week, ENEC announced it had signed an MoU with Westinghouse to explore collaboration opportunities for the deployment of advanced nuclear energy solutions in the USA.


(Image: Westinghouse)

Westinghouse said the collaboration will "leverage ENEC's world-class expertise in large-scale nuclear development and operations and Westinghouse's industry leading nuclear technologies".

Under the MoU, the companies will explore ways to accelerate the deployment of the AP1000 reactor in the USA. In addition, ENEC and Westinghouse will look at ways to collaborate across a broad range of opportunities, including new build and restart projects in the USA, development of commercial and operational deployment models for AP1000 reactors, and fuel supply chains, operations and maintenance services.

"With ENEC's proven track record in developing one of the world's most advanced nuclear energy programmes, our collaboration with Westinghouse brings together two leaders in our fields," Al Hammadi said. "This marks a significant step in supporting the United States' bold ambitions to rapidly expand its nuclear fleet, reinforcing the deep and long-standing energy partnership between the UAE and the United States."

Assembly of Taipingling 3 containment vessel begins


Monday, 28 July 2025
The bottom head of the containment vessel of unit 3 at the Taipingling nuclear power plant has been installed on the central raft foundation of the unit's nuclear island, China General Nuclear announced.
Assembly of Taipingling 3 containment vessel begins
(Image: CGN)

The HPR1000 (Hualong One) reactor design features a double-layered containment structure. The main function of the containment building is to ensure the integrity and leak tightness of the reactor building, and it plays a key role in the containment of radioactive substances.

The 36 steel sub-modules of the bottom head module were prefabricated off-site, transported to the construction site and welded together. The completed module - measuring about 43 metres in diameter, 6 metres in height and weighing more than 130 tonnes - was hoisted into place using a 2,000-tonne crawler crane.

China General Nuclear (CGN) said installation of the first containment module at Taipingling unit 3 "marks the steady advancement of the modular construction technology of nuclear island civil engineering in the Taipingling Nuclear Power Project, and lays a solid foundation for the high-quality construction of subsequent nuclear island civil engineering projects".

The Taipingling plant in Guangdong province will eventually have six Hualong One reactors. The construction of the first and second units began in 2019 and 2020, respectively. Unit 1 is scheduled to start up later this year, with unit 2 following in 2026.

Construction of the second phase of the plant - units 3 and 4 - was approved by China's State Council on 29 December 2023. The first safety-related concrete was poured for the reactor building of Taipingling unit 3 last month.

Slovakia and Urenco sign enriched uranium supply contract


Monday, 28 July 2025
Slovenské elektrárne has signed a contract with Urenco Group for the supply of enriched uranium to its Bohunice and Mochovce nuclear power plants to the mid-2030s.
Slovakia and Urenco sign enriched uranium supply contract
(Image: Slovenske elecktrarne/Urenco)

It follows an international tender launched last year aimed at diversifying Slovakia's supplies and strengthening its energy security.

Branislav Strýček, Chairman and CEO of Slovenské elektrárne, said: "We are pleased that through future cooperation with Urenco Group, we can diversify our business relationships. It will significantly help us continue maintaining the stable and secure operation of our nuclear power plants."

Urenco’s Chief Commercial Officer Laurent Odeh, said: "We are very proud at Urenco to be entering into a new market with a new customer, and I’d like to pay tribute to Slovenské elektrárne for placing their trust in us.

"Urenco is committed to supporting countries’ energy security by providing enrichment services to fuel clean, reliable nuclear energy. We are also deeply committed to helping our customers progress their net zero goals."

Background: A guide: Uranium and the nuclear fuel cycle

Slovakia has five operable nuclear reactors with a capacity of 2.3 GW, generating about half of its electricity. It has a fourth unit at the Mochovce nuclear power plant under construction.

Slovenske elektrárne said that in the nuclear fuel cycle uranium enrichment "is technologically and financially the most demanding phase ... therefore, access to reliable and diversified enrichment services is a strategic priority for every nuclear power plant operator".

Urenco, which is headquartered in the UK, has enrichment facilities in Germany, the Netherlands, the UK and the USA. It is one-third owned by the UK government, one-third by the Dutch government and one-third by the German utilities EOn and RWE AG. It was founded in 1970 following the signing of the Treaty of Almelo by the governments of Germany, the Netherlands and the UK.

Work starts on Pele microreactor core

Friday, 25 July 2025

Fabrication of the reactor core for the Project Pele prototype mobile microreactor - the first microreactor to be built and operated in the USA - has begun at  BWX Technologies' Innovation Campus in Lynchburg, Virginia.
Work starts on Pele microreactor core
Pele prototype core reactor assembly (Image: BWXT)

Project Pele was launched in 2019 with the objective of designing, building, and demonstrating a prototype mobile nuclear reactor within five years. The initiative is led by the Department of Defense's Strategic Capabilities Office, which is working in collaboration with the US Department of Energy (DOE), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the US Army Corps of Engineers, as well as with industry partners.

BWXT Advanced Technologies and X-energy LLC were subsequently selected to develop a final design for a prototype mobile high-temperature gas reactor using high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) tristructural isotropic (TRISO) fuel under the Project Pele initiative. BWXT was contracted in June 2022 to build a prototype 1.5 MWe microreactor. The contractor team also includes critical roles played by Northrop Grumman, Rolls Royce Liberty Works, and Torch Technologies. The fuel for the reactor will be produced at BWXT's facilities using material from the DOE's highly-enriched uranium inventory.

BWXT has now announced the start of work on the reactor core.


A rendering of the Pele microreactor (Image: BWXT)

"We are proud to develop and deliver the Pele microreactor for the benefit of our armed forces," said BWXT Advanced Technologies President Kate Kelly. "This is a tremendous achievement for the BWXT team and for the advancement of groundbreaking nuclear energy technology as a reliable, resilient source of electricity and heat for multiple applications."

The prototype reactor facility is designed to be transported within four 20-foot shipping containers, and tested at Idaho National Laboratory's (INL's) Critical Infrastructure Test Range Complex. The technology is expected to begin producing electricity in 2028.

BWXT said it has completed fabricating the TRISO nuclear fuel for the reactor and will ship it to INL in the months ahead.

Northrop Grumman is providing the control module for the reactor, while Rolls-Royce is developing the power conversion module at its Liberty Works facility in Indianapolis, Indiana.

Regulatory approvals pave way for Palisades restart


Friday, 25 July 2025

The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved a series of licensing and regulatory actions that will allow fuel loading at Holtec's plant.

Regulatory approvals pave way for Palisades restart
Greg Bowman, Acting Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (seated, left) and Kelly Trice, watched by NRC's Jamie Pelton, Mike King, Commissioner Annie Caputo, Jason Kozal and Philip McKenna at the ceremony at NRC's headquarters (Image: Holtec)

Palisades, a single-unit pressurised water reactor in Covert, Michigan, ceased operations in May 2022 and was defuelled the following month, although it was licensed to operate until March 2031. The unit's licence was transferred from previous operator Entergy Nuclear Operations to Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC and Holtec Palisades, LLC, for decommissioning, but in late 2023, Holtec began the process of obtaining the licensing approvals needed to return the plant to operational status for the remainder of its licensing term.

Following the completion of technical reviews, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has now approved the transfer of operating authority for the plant and its independent spent fuel storage facility from Holtec Decommissioning International LLC to Palisades Energy LLC. It has also approved the reinstatement of various documents and programmes that were in place prior to the shutdown, including the technical specifications, emergency plan, emergency action levels, and physical security plan, as well as programmes for quality assurance, maintenance, and in-service inspections.

"The NRC staff is issuing its approval of these actions concurrently with its approval of this exemption to reauthorise power operations at PNP. The effectiveness of this exemption will occur on August 25, 2025, Holtec's planned date to transition to the power operations licensing basis," the NRC told Holtec Vice President, Licensing, Regulatory Affairs Jean Fleming in a letter dated 24 July.

There are still several licensing actions under NRC review and additional requirements that need to be met before the plant can start up.

The approval means that Palisades is authorised to receive new fuel and formally transition licensed reactor operators to on-shift status, Holtec said.

"The NRC's approval to transition Palisades back to an operating licence represents an unprecedented milestone in US nuclear energy," Holtec International President Kelly Trice said. "Our mission remains clear: to restart Palisades safely, securely, reliably, and in support of America's energy future - while supporting local jobs and economic growth for decades to come."

DeepGeo and Allweld partner for nuclear energy in Africa


Friday, 25 July 2025

US-based Deep Geo Inc and South Africa-based Allweld Nuclear and Industrial have signed a memorandum of understanding to support the development of new nuclear power capacity in Africa.

DeepGeo and Allweld partner for nuclear energy in Africa
(Image: DeepGeo/Allweld MoU)

DeepGeo is best known for its proposals to develop multinational repositories in Ghana, Somaliland and potentially Finland and Canada. Allweld is an Engineering Solutions company which has been serving the nuclear and other sectors in South Africa and beyond since the early 1960s.

The two will work together to promote DeepGeo's Ubuntu Nuclear Energy, a nuclear project company aiming "to lead the development of standardised fleets of nuclear power plants across Africa and beyond", pursuing a "commercial, regional approach" working with one or two technology partners so it can realise standardisation across projects and "progressively localise the supply chain so that more benefits can be realised by the building countries".

Link Murray, President of DeepGEO, said: "Allweld has a stellar international reputation for quality workmanship, reliability, and employee development. It is a natural partner for supporting our regional and cooperative approach to nuclear energy development in Africa - Ubuntu Nuclear Energy. Allweld’s inspired and innovative leadership is helping us to break open Africa’s nuclear gridlock."

Mervyn Fischer, Allweld CEO, said: "DeepGEO is a vibrant and active nuclear company that is clearly deeply committed to the expansion and sustainability of nuclear energy. If the nuclear industry expects to make rapid progress, it can’t continue to do things the same way they have been done before. We need to embrace innovative solutions. African countries, especially, have the clear potential to leapfrog their European and American peers by adopting regional and harmonised approaches."

Ubuntu Nuclear Energy says it is currently working towards establishing its initial projects and is seeking early-stage investment and looking to finalise its technology and supply chain partners.

The MoU says "DeepGEO intends to preferentially partner with Allweld to support the construction, operation and maintenance of its nuclear project opportunities in Africa, and potentially globally … Allweld agrees to lend its support to DeepGEO/Ubuntu Nuclear Energyas a technical expert and business partner to support its sales and investment".

And it says the two companies "seek to advance the goal of Africa reaching full independence in the peaceful uses of nuclear sciences and technologies"

France and Belgium agree to enhance nuclear cooperation

Friday, 25 July 2025
The energy ministers of France and Belgium have signed a declaration of intent for the two countries to deepen their cooperation on nuclear energy. The move comes after Belgium decided to reverse its nuclear phase-out policy.
France and Belgium agree to enhance nuclear cooperation
(Image: bihet.belgium.be)

The declaration was signed in Paris on 23 July by Belgium's Federal Minister of Energy Mathieu Bihet and France's Minister responsible for Industry and Energy Marc Ferracci.

The declaration aims to strengthen exchanges between the two governments in key areas, including: the extended operation of existing reactors; the development of new projects, including small modular reactors (SMRs); research and innovation; strategic supply chains; training and skills.

These thematic cooperation areas will be the subject of individual projects and specific working groups, Bihet said in a statement.

"After opening up the field of possibilities with the repeal of the 2003 law, we are now moving on to a new stage, that of the concrete construction of cooperation," he said. "With this declaration, we are sitting down with France, a friendly country, a major industrial partner, and a pioneer in civil nuclear power in Europe.

"The partnership is based on a shared ambition: to make nuclear power a strategic lever for a more sustainable, competitive, and resilient Europe. It demonstrates a desire to make nuclear power not only a tool for transition, but also an industrial and scientific pillar for future generations."

"This declaration demonstrates our shared commitment to developing our nuclear industries and launching ambitious energy programmes to secure our future," Ferracci said in a post on X. "I also commend Belgium's recent commitment to the European Nuclear Alliance, alongside France. Together, we advocate for a European energy strategy based on technological neutrality, energy sovereignty, and decarbonisation."

The European Nuclear Alliance currently comprises Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Finland, France, Hungary, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia and Sweden, plus Belgium and Italy as observers. The alliance's members have committed to expanding their use of nuclear energy.

In May, Belgium's federal parliament voted by a large majority to repeal a 2003 law for the phase-out of nuclear power and banning the construction of new nuclear generating capacity. Under the phase-out policy, unit 1 of the Tihange plant was set to shut in October this year, with Doel 2 following in December. Belgium's last two reactors - Doel 4 and Tihange 3 - were scheduled to close in November 2025, but a final agreement was reached in December for the two units to continue operating for a further 10 years.

"This declaration is in line with the ongoing revival of the nuclear industry in Belgium, as confirmed by the amendment of the 2003 law and the announcement of the return of nuclear power to our energy mix," Bihet said. "It demonstrates our country's commitment to working hand in hand with its European partners on long-term strategic issues: security of supply, energy sovereignty, decarbonisation, and innovation."

Ocean-Power to consider deployment of Danish SMRs

Thursday, 24 July 2025
Norwegian energy developer Ocean-Power and Danish nuclear technology company Copenhagen Atomics have signed a memorandum of understanding to jointly study the potential for producing electricity and heat in Norway using thorium-based molten salt reactors.
Ocean-Power to consider deployment of Danish SMRs
Rendering of Ocean-Power's Blue power barge with gas energy and carbon capture – where thorium-based reactors from Copenhagen Atomics could become a possible alternative to replace gas (Image: Copenhagen Atomics)

The MoU initiates a strategic collaboration between the two companies, combining Ocean-Power's expertise in project development and energy conversion with Copenhagen Atomics' advanced reactor technology.

The joint study will assess the technical and regulatory conditions for deploying thorium reactors in Norway. It will include evaluations of power and heat demands, site selection, dialogue with Norwegian stakeholders, and conceptual design of a complete energy plant based on Copenhagen Atomics' reactor modules.

The study will provide a basis for potential further collaboration on project development and deployment.

"Our modular reactor technology is designed to be scalable, cost-efficient, and flexible," said Copenhagen Atomics CEO Thomas Jam Pedersen. "We are excited about this collaboration with Ocean-Power and view Norway as a promising market for the next generation of nuclear energy."

Ocean-Power's current concept is to develop floating power plants featuring combined cycle power plants (gas turbines and steam turbines). The 200-250 MW floating plants would be used to supply power to nearby platforms for the offshore version and to the grid inshore. CO2 from the exhaust gases will be captured and would then be either injected directly into a nearby geological formation, into a pipeline or liquefied and transported by vessel for usage or permanent storage.

"This is an important step in our mission to provide sustainable and reliable power for Norwegian industry," said Ocean-Power CEO Erling Ronglan. "We see great potential in Copenhagen Atomics' technology and look forward to exploring how it can be integrated with our capabilities to deliver clean, firm power to the grid."

Copenhagen Atomics is developing a containerised molten salt reactor. Moderated with unpressurised heavy water, the reactor consumes nuclear waste while breeding new fuel from thorium. Small enough to allow for mass manufacturing and assembly line production, the reactor has an output of 100 MWt. Copenhagen Atomics' goal is to deliver energy at a levelised cost of just EUR20 (USD23.5) per MWh.

The company's thorium reactors are expected to consume the transuranic elements in used nuclear fuel from conventional nuclear reactors, which radically reduces the amount of long-lived radioactive waste. To achieve this, Copenhagen Atomics intends to separate used nuclear fuel from light water reactors into four streams: zircaloy, uranium, fission products and transuranics. Its reactor designs can make use of plutonium (a transuranic) to 'kickstart' the use of thorium.

First steam generator lowered into place at Hinkley Point C

Thursday, 24 July 2025
The first of four 520-tonne steam generators has been installed in the first unit of the Hinkley Point C nuclear power plant in the UK.
First steam generator lowered into place at Hinkley Point C
(Image: EDF)

The carefully planned installation involved lifting the generator on to a special section of railtrack to be brought into the building.


(Image: Screengrab from EDF/Youtube)

It then had to be lifted and rotated into place where it will use the 295°C heat from the EPR reactor to turn water into steam to turn the turbine, to generate electricity.


(Image: EDF)

The installation brings an end to the journey for the 25-metre steam generator, which was manufactured by Framatome in France. The first of the eight steam generators that the two-unit plant will feature was delivered to the site in southwest England in May 2024 after a journey by sea and road.


The first steam generator was delivered to the site last year (Image: EDF)

Construction of the first of two 1630 MWe EPR reactors at Hinkley Point C began in December 2018, with construction of unit two beginning a year later. The dome of unit 1 was put in place in December 2023. The dome was lifted into place on the second unit's containment building last week.

Last year, EDF announced that the "base case" was now for unit 1 being operational in 2030, with the cost revised from GBP26 billion (USD32.8 billion) to between GBP31-34 billion, in 2015 prices.

When complete, the two EPR reactors will produce enough carbon-free electricity for six million homes, and are expected to operate for as long as 80 years.

There are now 127 different SMR designs, finds NEA report


Wednesday, 23 July 2025
The latest edition of the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency's Small Modular Reactor Dashboard reports growing interest around the world with 51 SMR designs involved in pre-licensing or licensing processes and 85 active discussions between SMR developers and site owners.
There are now 127 different SMR designs, finds NEA report
(Image: OECD NEA SMR Dashboard)

The NEA Small Modular Reactor (SMR) Dashboard identifies 127 SMR designs, which is up from 98 in its previous edition. It also reports that since that 2024 edition there has been an 81% increase in the number of SMR designs to have secured at least one source of funding, or funding commitment.

It says there are seven designs operating or under construction with a "strong pipeline of projects progressing toward first-of-a-kind deployment".
(Image: NEA SMR Dashboard)

NEA Director-General William Magwood, said: "The overarching developments reflected in the NEA SMR Dashboard are clear: the strategic drivers for SMR deployment - rising electricity demand, including from data centres and expanding digital services, energy security imperatives and national goals set by many countries to reduce carbon emissions - are intensifying. SMRs are now a core part of the energy strategies in an increasing number of countries in all parts of the world."

The dashboard is now available as a digital interactive platform, which is searchable by country, by technology and by readiness.


(Image: NEA SMR Dashboard)

For the new report, 74 of the 127 designs identified were analysed. Of the other 53 designs, 25 asked not to be included in this year's edition, with the other ones including SMR designs not under active development or cancelled or paused.

Favoured fuel


(Image: NEA SMR Dashboard)

Thirty of the SMR designs reviewed require high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) fuel enriched between 10% and 20% and nine plan to use HALEU fuel enriched between 5% and 10%.

The report notes: "The availability of HALEU remains a significant barrier to the deployment of many SMR designs, though some developers have engaged early to secure supplies for their first-of-a-kind reactors. The data collected shows that as of early 2025, more than half of the SMRs planning to use HALEU had not yet progressed beyond non-binding agreements or collaborative studies with national laboratories related to fuel supply."

It adds: "SMR designs are based on an increasingly diverse range of fuel forms, most of which have not yet been licensed or qualified for use. Uranium oxide ceramics are the most common fuel in commercial reactors today. However, innovative SMR designs are introducing a wide range of novel fuels that require different manufacturing processes and technologies. Standard uranium oxide ceramic fuel is the most common fuel among the SMR technologies under active development, with 39 planning to use it as their fuel. Out of these 39 designs, 19 incorporate or plan to incorporate a composite fuel architecture, such as TRISO, distinguishing them from the conventional fuel used in today’s large-scale light-water reactors and potentially altering significantly fuel fabrication requirements and performance characteristics. More broadly, 47 SMR designs, over 60% of those included in this edition of the Dashboard, rely on fuel forms that are not currently available at commercial scale."


(Image: NEA SMR Dashboard)

Magwood, in his foreword to the third edition of the dashboard, said: "Private investment is surging, with an estimated USD5.4 billion of capital now flowing from venture and corporate sources. Major global corporations such as Google, Amazon, Meta and Dow Chemical have recently bolstered this wave of investment to meet energy needs consistent with their environmental goals. And now with three SMR companies publicly traded, we are witnessing growing confidence in capital markets. The recent announcement that the World Bank will now consider financing nuclear energy projects also sends a clear and powerful signal to other financial institutions.

"Equally notable is the evolution on the regulatory front. In 2024, more than 33 SMR designs began pre-licensing activities with nuclear regulators - a 65% increase from the 2023 edition. ... the siting landscape has also evolved, with nearly 85 active discussions worldwide as of early 2025. As SMRs move from concept to construction, new markets are opening - not only for electricity, but also for non-electric applications like industrial heat and hydrogen production. The supply chain associated with SMR sector development is beginning to take shape, with universities, national laboratories and engineering firms contributing to capacity-building efforts."

He added that despite the growth in the sector there were still potential constraints to overcome, such as the supply of HALEU fuel, which "underscores the need for co-ordinated international action and support mechanisms to unlock fuel availability".

The latest edition, which covers the situation up to February 2025, coincides with the digital tracker, which offers "real-time access to global SMR developments. This marks a significant leap forward in transparency, accessibility and utility for the international nuclear policy community".

SCI-FI-TEK-70YRS IN THE MAKING

UKAEA develops 3D printing for fusion components

Monday, 28 July 2025
The UK Atomic Energy Authority has begun using two additive manufacturing - or 3D printing - machines that use complementary methods to manufacture highly specialised components for fusion machines.
UKAEA develops 3D printing for fusion components
(Image: UKAEA)

"The components within future fusion power plants will have to operate under complex and challenging conditions, including extreme temperatures, high neutron loads, and strong magnetic fields," said the UKAEA, which carries out fusion energy research on behalf of the UK government, overseeing the country's fusion programme. "As a result, they require complex combinations of materials and precision engineering."

It says that additive manufacturing is "well suited" to producing materials with intricate designs, and in low volumes, making it ideal for a sector such as fusion. UKAEA believes that 3D printing can play an important role in the future of fusion, reducing the costs of this precision manufacturing.

At its recently opened Central Support Facility (CSF), UKAEA has commissioned an electron beam additive manufacturing machine alongside a selective laser manufacturing machine.

The eMELT Electron Beam Powder Bed Fusion (E-PBF) additive machine, made by Freemelt, will use electron beam technology to join tungsten in powder-form into solid components with almost 100 percent density. The eMELTmachine will be used to layer tungsten onto other materials such as copper chrome zirconium, stainless steel and Eurofer 97, a special type of steel developed for use in fusion machines.

The SLM280 selective laser manufacturing machine will be used to experiment with how to produce components with the complex geometries and material combinations that will be essential for successful fusion plants. The SLM280 is manufactured by Nikon SLM, provided by Kingsbury Machine Tools, supported by Additure.

Both 3D printing technologies will support the manufacture of plasma-facing components that will be exposed to extreme temperatures during their operational lifecycle. The machines will also reduce the reliance on traditional techniques such as welding, reducing the number of manufacturing operations and joining processes.

"Using these machines will enable parts and geometries to be produced more efficiently than by using traditional fabrication methods," said Roy Marshall, Head of Operations for Fabrication, Installation and Maintenance at UKAEA. "Many companies will have either an electron beam machine or selective laser manufacturing technology but having both capabilities under one roof - and able to produce components at scale - is a first for the fusion industry."

UKAEA said it is now working to prepare commercial partners for the large-scale production that is essential for the fusion energy plants of the future.

 

U.S. Onshore Oil Production Soars to Record Highs

U.S. crude oil production from onshore federal lands hit a record 1.7 million barrels per day (bpd) in 2024, according to the EIA and the Department of the Interior. That’s a sixfold jump since 2008—far outpacing the broader rise in national crude output, which nearly tripled to 13.2 million bpd over the same period. The driver? An explosion of activity in New Mexico’s portion of the Permian Basin, where leasing, permitting, and drilling have surged in recent years.

From FY2020 through FY2023, New Mexico accounted for the majority of federal land drilling permits approved and well bores started. The state has quietly become the epicenter of the federal onshore oil boom, combining geological riches with favorable permitting conditions and existing infrastructure.

Federal offshore oil, by contrast, hasn’t kept pace. While output from the Gulf of Mexico did edge up, it remained at 1.8 million bpd in 2024—slightly ahead of federal onshore levels, but with far more sluggish growth.

Natural gas tells a slightly different story. Onshore federal lands produced 4.2 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of natural gas in 2024, up from 3.2 Tcf in 2020. That rise tracked closely with national gas production, which climbed from 33.8 Tcf to 37.8 Tcf during the same period. The share of U.S. natural gas coming from onshore federal lands rose modestly—from 9.6% to 11%—marking a small but notable reversal in what had been a long-term decline.

Meanwhile, federal offshore gas production continues to fade, slumping to just 0.8 Tcf in 2024—less than one-third of its 2005 level. In other words, the new growth frontier isn’t under the sea, but under the sagebrush.

By Julianne Geiger for Oilprice.com

 

Trump Clears Alaska’s Oil Path—Again

The Trump administration has formally scrapped a trio of policy documents that imposed new limitations on oil and gas development in Alaska’s National Petroleum Reserve (NPR-A), the DOI said on Monday, clearing the decks for a new wave of drilling across the 23-million-acre expanse. This marks the latest salvo in Trump’s aggressive energy dominance strategy—and a direct reversal of Biden-era efforts to wall off roughly 10.6 million acres from future leasing.

At the heart of the move is a power shift: taking discretion out of the hands of regulators and environmental planners, and putting it back into the hands of industry. The Department of the Interior says the rescinded policies—two issued in January and one in July 2024—lacked statutory grounding, ignored local voices, and undermined the core purpose of the NPR-A, which Congress designated as a strategic domestic energy reserve nearly a century ago.

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum called the Biden administration’s approach “obstruction over production,” adding that the new action aligns BLM’s policies with the reserve’s original mission. The rescission also fulfills Executive Order 14153 and Secretary’s Order 3422—two cornerstones of Trump’s “Unleashing Alaska’s Extraordinary Resource Potential” initiative.

The policy reset has immediate implications for oil majors like ConocoPhillips, which is pushing forward on its 600-million-barrel Willow project, expected to come online in 2029. It also signals to other operators—Santos Ltd., Repsol, Armstrong Oil & Gas—that Alaska is once again open for business.

Trump’s team is laying the groundwork for a broader resource play. One that doesn’t just boost oil production in the Arctic, but potentially doubles the throughput of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline and lays the foundation for a long-sought Alaska LNG export project. The administration’s recent visits to Prudhoe Bay with Asian trade officials hint at a much bigger ambition: securing foreign investment for new infrastructure that would finally monetize Alaska’s stranded gas.

Environmentalists are already sounding alarms over the rollback. But the White House sees opportunity—in barrels, Btu’s, and billions in long-delayed projects. And this time, they’re not waiting for consensus.

By Julianne Geiger for Oilprice.com

How Iceland Could Become the EU's Newest Member


  • Iceland is considering holding a referendum before 2027 to resume accession talks with the European Union, driven by unease over geopolitical and trade tensions with the United States and the EU.

  • Despite suspending talks in 2013, Iceland has already closed many accession chapters and its current application remains valid, making it a strong candidate for quick integration due to its participation in the European Economic Area.

  • Key obstacles to Iceland's full EU membership include concerns over the Common Agricultural Policy and the highly sensitive issue of fisheries, as well as a general reluctance among Icelandic political parties to cede sovereignty.

When predicting which country would be the next to join the European Union, the smart money seems to be on Montenegro given that it has been negotiating for years and has advanced the furthest of all candidates.

Others point to Albania, which is currently making great strides toward Brussels as the next member.

There are also some who think that Moldova -- a reform-oriented and ambitious country in the bloc’s eastern neighborhood -- stands a decent chance of becoming EU member state number 28 in the coming year.

But the right answer may actually be Iceland.

The Trump administration's overtures to annex the Danish territory of Greenland and the prospect of a trade war between its security provider, the United States, and its biggest trading partner, the European Union, have created unease on the North Atlantic island.

The current Icelandic government, which came to power last year, has announced that a referendum will be held before 2027 on resuming accession talks with Brussels. Polls suggest a majority would support restarting talks.

The country has been here before.

It was badly hit by the 2008 global financial crisis, when three of its major banks collapsed. EU membership -- and especially joining the eurozone -- was seen as a way out of the crisis, and negotiations with the bloc began in 2010.

Talks were suspended three years later by a newly elected right-wing government. By then, the eurozone was itself engulfed in the same financial crisis, so joining the club and adopting its ailing common currency was no longer seen as a panacea.

In those three years of accession talks, Reykjavik opened most of the 33 accession chapters and closed 11.

By comparison, the current EU accession frontrunner, Montenegro, has managed to close a mere seven chapters in more than a decade of talks.

'A Sovereign Decision'

It’s not for nothing that EU officials believe that Iceland could wrap up the entire process in a couple of years if it was to resume its application -- which according to the European Commission still remains valid.

It helps, of course, that the country is part of the European Economic Area (EEA), which means that it -- together with other EEA members Norway and Liechtenstein -- is already applying the EU’s internal market rules.

When European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen visited the island last week, she was quick to point out that the issue of future EU membership is “a sovereign decision that the people take here. So, it’s not a topic for me to comment on.”

But, she added, “Iceland is familiar and integrated into the single market, we share values, we know each other very well, we are like-minded -- all this is an asset.”

Speaking under the condition of anonymity, a European diplomat familiar with the topic was even more forthright.

“It would be good if a Western European country would join the EU, especially after Brexit,” they said. “It would show that the club truly is attractive.”

Integration would prove seamless, given that Iceland is richer than the EU average and -- with a population of 300,000 -- would be the smallest member state if it joined.

While Brussels officially is trying to stay out of the Icelandic debate on membership, it is quietly doing everything to edge it closer.

During her visit, von der Leyen promised a trade review to potentially upgrade the EEA agreement. She also struck a deal to protect critical infrastructure that is essential for Iceland, such as subsea cables, and started negotiations on a new security and defense partnership agreement, which would allow closer cooperation on cyber and hybrid threats.

The partnership, expected to be ready by year’s end, is especially important for Iceland, which is acutely aware of the need for security cooperation, particularly as both Russia and China are becoming more active in the Arctic region.

The United States has also rattled the country recently with talk of taking over Greenland, sparking debate there about rejoining the European Union after leaving the European Communities -- a precursor of today’s EU -- back in 1985.

While Washington hasn’t made similar claims on Iceland, there is a certain nervousness, as the US provides for the country’s defense on behalf of NATO via a bilateral agreement signed in 1951.

To this day, Iceland is the only NATO member without its own army and there are no imminent plans to create one.

In 2006, the United States announced it would continue to provide for the island’s defense but without forces being permanently stationed there. That policy still stands, and the former US air base in Keflavik remains a hub for NATO exercises.

Trade Tension

But it is the transatlantic trade tension that is really making Iceland twitchy.

Reykjavik wants Brussels to consult them on the EU-US trade talks, but that is not something that EU officials can promise without full membership.

And it is trade in general that could spark conflict during eventual membership negotiations, especially on agriculture and fisheries, which are key industries on the island.

Those two items are excluded from the EEA for good reason.

There is a fear that the EU’s common agriculture policy would kill farming on the island by flooding it with cheap food products from other EU member states.

Fishing is even more delicate.

Reykjavik claims proudly that its management of fishing stocks is superior to Brussels.

And it would be very reluctant to give up its exclusive rights to fishing within its 200-mile economic zone to Danish, Dutch, Irish, Spanish, or French fleets.

Then there is commercial whaling, which is still is permitted in Icelandic waters despite the EU’s push for a global moratorium.

The fact remains that most political parties in the Icelandic parliament are against EU membership.

And while polls show that the population is keen to restart talks with Brussels, they are less sure that they actually want to become members.

In Brussels, officials remain hopeful but see obstacles for a small yet fiercely independent nation to voluntarily give up some of its sovereignty.

“It’s a long shot on their side, not ours,” one said.

By RFE/RL 

The U.S. Is Falling Behind in the Global EV Race

  • Tesla posted its sharpest revenue and delivery drop in over a decade, as Elon Musk warns of turbulent quarters ahead.

  • The U.S. EV market is slowing dramatically, with sales falling 6.3% in Q2 despite federal incentives.

  • China and Europe continue to dominate EV growth, creating risks for U.S.-based manufacturers and energy infrastructure planners.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk has warned that the end of U.S. government support for electric vehicles could lead to “a few rough quarters,” following the automaker’s steepest revenue and delivery decline in more than a decade. Tesla is now relying on a long-promised affordable model and its autonomous ride-hailing roadmap to regain momentum, but immediate growth prospects look dim in the U.S. market.

The caution comes as global EV sales continue to rise. According to Rho Motion, 9.1 million EVs were sold worldwide in the first half of 2025, up 28% YoY. Not surprisingly, China led, with 5.5 million units, followed by Europe with 2 million. By contrast, North America added just 900,000 units, a modest 3% gain over last year, as reported by Electrek.

In contrast to strong global figures, the U.S. market is faltering. Data from Cox Automotive shows that EV sales in the U.S. fell by 6.3% in the second quarter compared to Q2 2024, totaling 310,839 units. This marked only the third quarterly year-on-year decline since EVs gained mainstream traction. Incentives remained high, averaging $8,500 per vehicle in June (nearly 15% of sticker price), but failed to spark additional demand.

Tesla’s global deliveries dropped to 384,122 vehicles in Q2, down 13.5% YoY, according to Reuters. Meanwhile, BYD reported a 16% increase in global deliveries and a 46% jump in battery-electric sales, overtaking Tesla in global BEV market share for the quarter.

General Motors delivered 46,280 EVs in Q2, more than doubling its volume from a year ago, and is now the second-largest EV seller in the U.S. Ford also increased sales but has slowed EV investment under the weight of cost pressures and revised capital priorities.

The U.S. policy environment is shifting rapidly. The “Big, Beautiful Bill”, signed by President Donald Trump earlier this month, eliminates the $7,500 federal EV tax credit as of October 1. It also ends credits for used EVs and home charger installations. Analysts expect a short-term Q3 bump from consumers rushing to claim benefits before the deadline, followed by a deeper Q4 slump, according to Reuters

Infrastructure gaps are compounding demand risks. As of midyear, fewer than 400 fast-charging ports had been completed under the federal government’s $7.5 billion National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure program, far short of targets. Reuters notes that this shortfall could dampen adoption, especially outside metro areas.

Globally, momentum remains strong. China now accounts for more than 60% of global new energy vehicle output, aided by vertically integrated supply chains and steady model releases. In Europe, Chinese brands are gaining share despite new tariffs, offering low-cost BEVs that undercut traditional automakers.

For the energy sector, this divergence could bode ill. Utilities banking on rising EV-related electricity demand may need to revise projections downward. Battery producers that scaled up U.S. production could face excess capacity if demand softens. At the same time, firms tied to Chinese or European supply chains might just continue to benefit from sustained global growth.

Q3 may deliver a temporary lift in U.S. volumes, but this is now a fairly fragile game. Tesla’s ability to reposition with a lower-cost model, or make good on its robotaxi promises, will be the key thing to watch for observers looking to predict U.S. trajectory. Globally, EVs are increasingly embedded in the mainstream. But for now, the U.S. isn’t taking the lead. Instead, it’s barely managing to keep pace. 

By Michael Kern for Oilprice.com


U.S. EV Makers Pivot to Energy Storage as Trump Targets Incentives

  • BloombergNEF slashed U.S. EV sales projections by 14 million units through 2030 due to policy rollbacks under Trump.

  • Automakers like GM and Tesla are refocusing on battery storage projects to meet rising electricity demands from AI-powered data centers.

  • Repurposing and recycling used EV batteries offers a new revenue stream and extends battery life beyond vehicle use.

The United States electric vehicle industry is facing a rough road ahead. The Trump administration has long promised to walk back a number of Biden administration policies aimed at climate change targets, including those designed to boost electric vehicle adoption. In light of the changing policy climate, BloombergNEF has lowered both its near- and long-term outlooks for EV sales in the United States for the first time ever, while the rest of the world’s numbers continue to climb.

BloombergNEF cut 14 million battery-powered cars from its sales projections through 2030 thanks to changing policies in the United States, which are removing supports from the EV industry as well as pressures to lower emissions. On the very first day of this term, Trump ordered the elimination of EV subsidies, and his administration is now loosening national fuel-economy standards, doing away with EV tax credits, and blocking California’s state-level emissions limits.

“President Donald Trump’s efforts to unravel policies supporting electric vehicles threatens to turn the US into a laggard for years to come,” reports Bloomberg.

As a result, the makers of EV batteries for U.S. markets are scrambling to find new buyers, and they’re increasingly turning to energy storage as a lifeline. Major companies like General Motors and LG are fast-tracking energy storage battery projects as they look to capitalize on a surge of demand on energy grids driven by data centers. 

The proliferation of artificial intelligence is placing unprecedented stress on energy grids, and along with it, unprecedented opportunity for battery storage. In 2024, Tesla’s energy storage revenue jumped 67 percent last year to $4 billion, making it an increasingly central part of the EV company’s portfolio

And now GM has signed a “non-binding memorandum of understanding” with Redwood Energy to sell new and used EV batteries to a recycling firm for reuse in energy storage projects used as a sort of power bank for data centers. These batteries hold onto electricity and excess energy produced by wind and solar when production outpaces demand, which it then feeds back into the grid – or into a connected data center – as needed.

“The market for grid-scale batteries and backup power isn’t just expanding, it’s becoming essential infrastructure,” Kurt Kelty, GM's vice president of batteries, propulsion, and sustainability, said in a recent statement. “Electricity demand is climbing, and it’s only going to accelerate. To meet that challenge, the U.S. needs energy storage solutions that can be deployed quickly, economically, and made right here at home. GM batteries can play an integral role. We’re not just making better cars — we’re shaping the future of energy resilience.” 

In addition to newly manufactured batteries, used EV batteries have potential for new life in energy storage applications. EV batteries are retired when their range drops below a certain threshold, but they still have a lot of life in them that can be used in other applications, according to a recent report released by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NDRC).

“There’s definitely some potential in the utility sector, especially in terms of grid back-up storage … even though [old EV batteries] have lost, say, 20% of their original capacity… when you’re talking about grid storage that can still be a perfectly usable battery for several more years,” says Jordan Brinn, the report’s author.

And even totally used-up batteries can be repurposed for energy storage needs. According to Brinn, 95 percent of the minerals in a dead EV battery can be reused to produce new batteries either for EVs or energy storage systems. Either way, this provides a critical new sector for EV makers, who can sell off new and used products to recycling centers as EV sales continue to slump within a discouraging policy environment.

By Haley Zaremba for Oilprice.com