Friday, December 26, 2025

 

Why Christmas tree farms are turning to drones and AI this year

 
By Roselyne Min
Published on 

Christmas tree farms around the world are increasingly turning to drones, artificial intelligence (AI), satellite imaging, and laser scanning to manage their fields more efficiently.

As the Christmas season nears, tree sellers are once again filling streets and town squares across Europe, stacking rows of firs destined for homes, offices and public spaces.

Behind the scenes, however, the way those trees are grown is beginning to change.

In Denmark, some farmers started using drones to map their fields and artificial intelligence (AI) to count and measure trees.

Denmark is Europe’s second biggest Christmas tree producer after Germany and the world’s biggest exporter, according to the Danish Christmas tree association.

In a case study shared with Euronews, the Serbian AI firm Agremo said a family-owned Christmas tree farm in Denmark replaced traditional manual counting with drones- and satellite-based imaging and analysis, reducing time spent walking the fields and limiting human error.

Agremo’s AI uses machine learning and computer vision to “teach the software how the tree looks,” and it can learn to “recognise the trees in the drone imagery,” according to Luka Živković, Agremo’s head of sales.

Christmas trees typically take around a decade to reach harvest. That long growth cycle makes regular monitoring of tree health, growth and yield essential for farmers.

Many growers previously relied on workers to walk fields and count or measure trees manually, a process that could take days and still produce inconsistent results.

The Serbian company said its system can map a 100-hectare plantation in around 30 minutes and count trees within 24 hours with an accuracy of up to 98 per cent.

“Some big nurseries that we work with (have) more than 100,000 trees, so measuring them and counting them would take them first a lot of labour and then a lot of time,” said Živković.

The AI tool also gives each tree an ID, allowing tracking of growth and sales.

‘Exciting time for Christmas trees’

Experts say drones can help farmers “save time and money”, as they can operate during early hours and reduce the need for manual labour.

In the United States, North Carolina State University supports growers through its Christmas Tree Extension programme, which provides research-based, practical guidance to the local industry.

North Carolina is one of the country’s leading Christmas tree-producing states, with around 33,000 acres (about 13,350 hectares) under cultivation.

At some farms, drones are now taking on work that previously required five to ten people, according to William H. Kohlway IV, a Christmas tree production specialist at North Carolina State University in the United States

“It’s a really exciting time for Christmas trees,” Kohlway told Euronews Next.

He said drones have moved rapidly from experimental tools to everyday equipment over the past three to five years, particularly for larger growers. Some producers are now investing in multiple agricultural drones because of their effectiveness in the field.

Kohlway said the rapid growth is partially thanks to Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR), a laser-based surveying technology, that can scan entire plantations in detail.

Drones can also carry out targeted spraying, applying fertilisers or herbicides to just the parts of the fields that need them.

“In fact, a lot of the guys who used to mainly do the stuff have now become drone operators, and they love it because they don't have to haul a backpack. They can just have the drone do the heavy lifting,” said Kohlway.

Unlike in Denmark, many Christmas trees in North Carolina are grown on slopes, where conventional machinery struggles and the risk of accidents is higher.

Autonomous ground-based drones, effectively robotic mowers, are being developed to work in areas that may be difficult or dangerous for humans to reach.

“We have some Christmas tree fields at like 60, 70 degree slopes. And a lot of mowers cannot handle that kind of steep slope. So the ones that are just now coming out are heavy-duty, kind of tank tread-based flail mowers, that can actually handle our inclines,” said Kohlway.

The true cost

Despite the promise, barriers remain.

The cost of drones hovers around €25,600 and software, along with training requirements and strict aviation rules, can make adoption difficult, particularly for smaller growers.

The Danish Christmas Tree Association also says that currently, “drones are used by big companies for inventory assessments only”.

“Danish growers vary a lot in size from small family companies (5-10 hectares) to big enterprises with more than 500 hectares. Therefore, their challenges are different, and their ways of dealing with the issues are equally different,” the association told Euronews Next in a statemen

Still, experts say interest is growing.

“Despite those small hurdles, a lot of people are really pushing to go into those things [drone technologies],” said Kohlway.

“And the adoption rate is rapidly increasing and as the drones get better every year and the price goes down and our growers become more technologically savvy, it's honestly a great thing to do because it's also bringing in a lot of the next generation of growers,” he added.

For more on this story, watch the video in the media player above.

Jimmy Kimmel warns against fascism and Donald Trump in 'Alternative Christmas Message'


Copyright Screenshot Channel 4


By Tokunbo Salako
Published on 26/12/2025 - EURONEWS


US talk show host Jimmy Kimmel targeted fascism and unsurprisingly Donald Trump in his 'Alternative Christmas' message broadcast on Britain's Channel 4 television network.

US comedian and talk show host Jimmy Kimmel has renewed his war of words with Donald Trump in a British television address known as "The Alternative Christmas Message."

In a speech broadcast of Channel 4 on Christmas Day, Kimmel warned about the rise of fascism and took aim at the US president who he said behaves as if he's a king.

“From a fascism perspective, this has been a really great year," he said. “Tyranny is booming over here."

Channel 4 began a tradition of airing an alternative Christmas message in 1993, as a counterpart to the British monarch's annual televised address to the nation. Channel 4 said the message is often a thought-provoking and personal reflection pertinent to the events of the year.

A history of beef

The comedian has regularly targeted Trump since returning to the air after ABC indefinitely suspended the “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” show in September following criticism of comments the host made over the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

Kimmel made remarks in reference to the reaction to Kirk’s shooting suggesting that many Trump supporters were trying to capitalise on the death.

Trump celebrated the suspension of the veteran late-night comic and his frequent critic, calling it “great news for America.” He also called for other late night hosts to be fired.
RelatedDonald Trump is reshaping the US media landscape: After Kimmel, who’s next?
Jimmy Kimmel suspended: How late-night hosts are taking a stand for free speech

The incident, one of Trump’s many disputes and legal battles waged with the media, drew widespread concerns about freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

Hundreds of leading Hollywood stars and others in the entertainment industry urged Americans to “fight to defend and preserve our constitutionally protected rights.” The show returned to the air less than a week later.



Kimmel told the UK audience that a Christmas miracle had happened in September when millions of people — some who hated his show — had spoken up for free speech.


“We won, the president lost, and now I’m back on the air every night giving the most powerful politician on Earth a right and richly deserved bollocking,” he said.

Channel 4 previously invited whistle-blower Edward Snowden and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to deliver the alternative Christmas message.


Kimmel, who said he didn't expect Brits to know who he was, warned that silencing critics is not just something that happens in Russia or North Korea.

Despite the split that led to the American Revolution 250 years ago, he said the two nations still shared a special relationship and urged the UK not to give up on the US as it was “going through a bit of a wobble right now.”

“Here in the United States right now, we are both figuratively and literally tearing down the structures of our democracy from the free press to science to medicine to judicial independence to the actual White House itself,” Kimmel said, in reference to demolition of the building's East Wing. “We are a right mess, and we know this is also affecting you, and I just wanted to say sorry.”




 US Department of Homeland Security turns Santa into an ICE agent in 'digusting' AI video

ICE AI Santa video blasted online as 'disgusting'
Copyright X screenshot

By David Mouriquand
Published on 

The US Department of Homeland Security has taken its holiday-themed campaign for mass deportations to a whole new low with an AI-generated video that turns Santa Claus into an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent.

Ho ho... holy hell.

US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has been getting into the festive spirit, and their latest AI-generated video has sparked backlash online, with many labelling it as "disgusting" way to promote a divisive immigration agenda.

The clip posted by the Department of Homeland Security, aimed to promote voluntary self-deportation before the end of 2025, was shared on social media with the slogan “Avoid ICE Air and Santa’s naughty list!”.

It casts Santa Claus as an ICE agent putting on body armour, handcuffing ‘migrants’ and loading them onto a deportation plane.

Check out the AI slop below:

Critics have described the Christmas-themed campaign “evil” and “disgusting.”

The video does make one wonder if the Department of Homeland Security realises that:

  1. Santa Claus is based on Saint Nicholas, who was known for his generosity of spirit and therefore completely at odds with everything ICE stands for.
  2. Saint Nicholas was a 4th century Greek bishop from Myra, now modern-day Turkey, and therefore not American.
  3. Santa is known for ignoring border controls and international airspace regulations to spread joy and presents, presumably without a visa, ESTA form or passport.

With all this in mind, ICE would probably consider Santa an illegal immigrant and deport him. Talk about a self-own.

Lumps of coal for you this year, Department of Homeland Security.




'Enjoy what may be your last Christmas!' Trump attacks 'sleazebags' in dark holiday screed

Robert Davis
December 25, 2025
RAW STORY



President Donald Trump attacked people he described as "losers" and "sleazebags" in a dark screed on social media on Christmas night.

In the post, Trump attempted to distance himself from disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, someone he has previously referred to as a close friend. This comes at a time when new revelations from recently released Epstein files show Trump rode on Epstein's private plane, dubbed the "Lolita Express," at least eight times. Other documents indicate Trump spent time at Epstein's home in New York City, and that the two men exchanged birthday pleasantries.

"Merry Christmas to all, including the many Sleazebags who loved Jeffrey Epstein, gave him bundles of money, went to his Island, attended his parties, and thought he was the greatest guy on earth, only to 'drop him like a dog' when things got too HOT, falsely claimed they had nothing to do with him, didn’t know him, said he was a disgusting person, and then blame, of course, President Donald J. Trump, who was actually the only one who did drop Epstein, and long before it became fashionable to do so," Trump wrote on Truth Social.

"When their names get brought out in the ongoing Radical Left Witch Hunt (plus one lowlife 'Republican,' Massie!), and it is revealed that they are Democrats all, there will be a lot of explaining to do, much like there was when it was made public that the Russia, Russia, Russia Hoax was a fictitious story - a total Scam - and had nothing to do with 'TRUMP,'" he wrote.

Trump also attacked "losers" like The New York Times for its coverage of his election and second administration.




"The Failing New York Times, among many others, was forced to apologize for their bad and faulty Election 'Reporting,' even to the point of losing many subscribers due to their highly inaccurate (FAKE!) coverage," Trump wrote. "Now the same losers are at it again, only this time so many of their friends, mostly innocent, will be badly hurt and reputationally tarnished. But sadly, that’s the way it is in the World of Corrupt Democrat Politics!!! Enjoy what may be your last Merry Christmas!"

Observers pounce on Trump's hateful Christmas rant: 'Never get used to this insanity'

David McAfee
December 25, 2025 
RAW STORY

Donald Trump caused a stir among his critics when he released a Christmas screed attacking his perceived enemies.

The president took to his own social media site, Truth Social, to strike a familiar tone for his celebrations of various holidays.

"Merry Christmas to all, including the Radical Left Scum that is doing everything possible to destroy our Country, but are failing badly. We no longer have Open Borders, Men in Women’s Sports, Transgender for Everyone, or Weak Law Enforcement," he wrote. "What we do have is a Record Stock Market and 401K’s, Lowest Crime numbers in decades, No Inflation, and yesterday, a 4.3 GDP, two points better than expected. Tariffs have given us Trillions of Dollars in Growth and Prosperity, and the strongest National Security we have ever had. We are respected again, perhaps like never before. God Bless America!!!"

This message didn't resonate well with political analysts.

Columnist Molly Jong-Fast wrote, "Nearly a decade of this …"

Another columnist (who never worked for Trump), Michael A. Cohen, also chimed in:

"I know people are going to complain about this … but Trump is directly quoting the original version of the Sermon on the Mount."

Economics expert Tahra Hoops said, "This is something you definitely say when the economy is thriving and your constituents are happy."

One popular user, Mark Mangino, simply said that Trump "can’t help himself."

Podcaster Spencer Hakimian quoted Trump and added, "Just as Jesus envisioned it."

Author Jennifer Erin Valent wrote, "One of my Christmas wishes is that we never, ever get used to this insanity."




'Holy projection': Internet erupts after Trump's Christmas Day screed


Robert Davis
December 25, 2025
RAW ST0RY

Political analysts and observers on Thursday chided President Donald Trump's dark screed against "sleazebags" and "losers."

Trump posted a holiday message on his Truth Social platform, where he decried how the recently released Jeffrey Epstein files have impacted his presidency, and attacked political enemies like the Democrats and Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) for forcing the administration to release the files. Trump also threatened that this year may be "the last Christmas" because of how he's been treated.

"Sadly, that’s the way it is in the World of Corrupt Democrat Politics!!!" Trump wrote on Truth Social. "Enjoy what may be your last Merry Christmas!"

Political analysts and observers shared their thoughts on social media.

"The walls are closing in on Donald Trump and his corrupt, criminal regime, and he’s absolutely losing his mind," Rep. Yassamin Anasari (D-AZ) posted on X. "Merry Christmas!!"

"Holy projection," Democratic analyst Adam Mockler posted on X.

"Trump, who has (sic) accused of raping young girls alongside Epstein in recently released DOJ files, is projecting again," writer Polly Singh posted on X.

"When bombing Nigeria doesn’t change the subject, might as well try whatever the hell this is supposed to be," Jeopardy champion Hemant Mehta posted on X.

"Why is @realDonaldTrump calling himself a 'Sleazebag'?" Democratic congressional candidate George Conway posted on X.

"He doesn’t sound merry," former CNN anchor Jim Acosta posted on X.

'Pathetic loser': Trump spends his Christmas posting over 100 times to social media

Alex Henderson
December 25, 2025 
ALTERNET


Donald Trump using a laptop aboard his private airplane on July 27, 2016
 (Image: Screengrab via Facebook / Donald J. Trump)


On Christmas Eve 2025, President Donald Trump took to his Truth Social platform and posted: "Merry Christmas to all, including the Radical Left Scum that is doing everything possible to destroy our Country, but are failing badly. We no longer have Open Borders, Men in Women's Sports, Transgender for Everyone, or Weak Law Enforcement."

Trump continued, " What we do have is a Record Stock Market and 401K’s, Lowest Crime numbers in decades, No Inflation, and yesterday, a 4.3 GDP, two points better than expected. Tariffs have given us Trillions of Dollars in Growth and Prosperity, and the strongest National Security we have ever had. We are respected again, perhaps like never before. God Bless America!!! President DJT."

But that post was just the beginning of Trump's Christmas posting blitz. He published more than 100 posts to his Truth Social account in the early hours of Christmas morning, the Independent reported.

Trump ranted about a variety of subjects, attacked Somali immigrants and bragged about his economic policies. The president also reiterated his repeatedly debunked claim that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from him.

Trump also reposted a video from deputy White House chief of staff Stephen Miller, who claimed that the president's opponents want to turn the United States into Somalia.

Miller, in the video, told viewers, "When you see the state of Somalia, that's what they want for America. Because it's easier to rule over an empire of ashes than it is for the Democratic Party to rule over a functioning, western, high-trust society with a strong middle class. That's their model for America: to make the whole country into a version of Somalia."

Trump's avalanche of Truth Social posts got a negative reaction from attorney Ari Cohn. Highlighting his posts about the 2020 election, Cohn posted, "What a pathetic loser."


The Donroe Doctrine

Happy Xmas (under Trump, war is far from over)

William Hartung,
 Common Dreams
December 25, 2025 


Donald Trump makes an announcement about new US Navy ships. REUTERS/Jessica Koscielniak

Earlier this month, the Trump administration released its new National Security Strategy, or NSS. Normally, such documents are poor predictors of what’s likely to happen in the real world. They are more like branding tools that communicate the attitudes of a given administration while rarely offering a detailed or accurate picture of its likely policies.


The reason documents like the NSS are of limited import is simple enough: foreign and military policies aren’t set by documents but by power and ideology. Typically enough, the current U.S. approach to the world flows from struggles among representatives of contending interest groups, some of which, like the military-industrial complex (MIC), have a significant advantage in the fight. The weapons industry and its allies in the Pentagon and Congress wield a wide array of tools of influence, including tens of millions of dollars in campaign contributions, more than 1,000 lobbyists, and jobs tied to military-related facilities in the states and districts of key members of Congress. The MIC — which my colleague Ben Freeman and I refer to in our new book as the trillion-dollar war machine — also has considerable influence over the institutions that shape our view of the world, from the media to DC think tanks, Hollywood, the gaming industry, and our universities.

But the power and influence of the war machine are not going completely unchallenged. The grip of militarism and the institutions that profit from it are indeed being challenged by organizations like The Poor People’s Campaign: A Call for Moral Revival; Dissenters, a youth antimilitarism group based in Chicago; antiwar veterans organizations like About Face, Common Defense, and Veterans for Peace; longstanding peace groups like the Friends Committee on National Legislation and Peace Action; networks like People Over Pentagon and Dismantle the Military-Industrial Complex; the ceasefire and Palestinian rights movements on U.S. campuses and beyond; and groups working for racial and economic justice, gay and trans rights, immigration reform, the demilitarization of the police, or compensation for environmental damage caused by nuclear weapons testing and other military activities.

As such organizations coalesce, bringing together tens of millions of us whose lives and prospects are impacted by this country’s ever-growing war machine, let’s hope it might be possible to create the power needed to build a better, more tolerant, and more peaceful world, one that meets the needs of the majority of its people, rather than endlessly squandering precious resources on war and preparations for more of it.

So why pay attention to that new strategy document if what really determines our safety and security lies elsewhere? There are several reasons to do so.

First, the NSS has prompted discussion in the mainstream media and elite circles of what U.S. priorities in the world should actually be — and such a discussion needs to be expanded to include the perspectives of people and organizations actually suffering the consequences of our militarized domestic and foreign policies.

Second, that strategy paper reflects the unnerving intentions and worldview of the current administration, which, of course, has the power to determine whether this country is at war or peace.

Finally, it suggests just how the Trump administration would like to be perceived. As such, it should be considered a weapon in the debate over what kind of country the United States should be.

'President of Peace'


From the start, the submission letter that accompanies the new strategy document is pure Donald Trump. In case you hadn’t noticed, the current occupant of the Oval Office would have us believe that everything — every single thing! — he does is bigger, better, and more beautiful than anything that ever came before it. And that’s definitely the case, in the first year of his second term, when it comes to his view of what this country’s national security policies should actually be. As the letter puts it:
“Over the past nine months, we have brought our nation — and the world — back from the brink of catastrophe and disaster. After four years of weakness, extremism, and deadly failures, my administration has moved with urgency and historic speed to restore American strength at home and abroad, and bring peace and stability to our world.
”No administration in history has brought about such a dramatic turnaround in so short a time.“

Needless to say, we’re expected to attribute that alleged American revival to the brilliance and tough-guy attitudes of the president and his team. But any reasonable American should instantly have doubts about that. After all, one of the Trump administration’s proudest accomplishments, as the new document notes, has been getting “radical gender ideology and woke lunacy out of our military.” Or, to put it slightly differently, under the guise of its crusade against DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion), the administration has effectively dismantled programs designed to reduce racism, misogyny, and anti-gay and anti-trans violence in the ranks of the military.

Whether the programs aimed at reducing entrenched discrimination in those ranks were ever sufficient is certainly doubtful, but that discrimination in the military needs to be addressed should have been and should still be beyond question. To cite just one example, a 2024 study by political geographer Jennifer Greenberg conducted for the Costs of War Project at Brown University found that there were more than 70,000 cases of sexual assault in the U.S. military in 2021 and 2023 (the years covered by her analysis). Her report also noted that, “on average, over the course of the war in Afghanistan, 24 percent of active-duty women and 1.9 percent of active-duty men experienced sexual assault.”

Pretending that widespread sexual violence doesn’t exist in the U.S. military or dismissing it as an example of “radical gender ideology and woke lunacy” should be considered, at best, a policy equivalent of criminal negligence. And it’s certainly not a great look for the person who desperately wants to be known as the “president of peace.”

But our commander-in-chief is nothing if not persistent (and predictable). In his introduction to the new strategy document, I’m sure you won’t be shocked to learn that President Trump takes the opportunity to pat himself on the back for allegedly ending “eight raging conflicts” in his first eight months in office — including those between Cambodia and Thailand, Kosovo and Serbia, Armenia and Azerbaijan, India and Pakistan, and Israel and Iran.

Of course, residents of many of those countries can be forgiven for not being aware of President Trump’s purported role in bringing relative peace to their regions or, in some of those cases, for failing to note that the peaceful situations he claims to have brought about don’t even exist. And they would be right to be skeptical. After all, this is the same president who has decimated the U.S. diplomatic corps and dismantled Washington’s main economic and humanitarian aid organization, the U.S. Agency for International Development — hardly the actions of a president of global peace.

Trump’s rhetoric in his introductory letter contrasts with some of the more sober passages in the document itself. His ranting and self-praise, however, are undoubtedly of more relevance when it comes to understanding the world that we’re actually in than the words in the body of that strategy’s blueprint. If his time in office tells us anything, it’s that his administration’s policies are heavily influenced by his personal desires and resentments, whether or not they square with existing laws, procedures, or policy pronouncements.

The Donroe Doctrine


The aspect of the newly announced military strategy that has gotten the most attention (and may be the closest to the president’s heart) is its focus not on the rest of the world but on the Western Hemisphere, including what the president has called the “Trump Corollary” to the Monroe Doctrine, or what’s come to be known as the “Donroe Doctrine.”

The hemispheric focus includes the administration’s harsh immigration crackdown. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is now literally kidnapping people off the city streets of this country, often regardless of their actual immigration status and absent the alleged criminal histories that have been used to justify its activities. President Trump sees this wave of repression as a badge of honor, arguing that “starting on my first day in office, we restored the sovereign borders of the United States and deployed the military to stop the invasion of our country.”

The hyper-militarization of the border has been paralleled by a wildly more aggressive posture in the hemisphere as a whole, most notably in the repeated attacks on alleged drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean Sea, the waters off of Venezuela, and even the eastern Pacific Ocean, and the preparations for what could become a regime-change war against the government of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. No matter that his country poses no direct threat whatsoever to the United States. And Republican calls for a full-scale war against that nation are occurring despite the disastrous results of this country’s regime-change policies in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and beyond in this century.

The attacks on those defenseless ships, targeting individuals who pose no direct threat to the United States and haven’t even been proven to be involved in drug trafficking, violate international law and are being carried out without the approval of Congress. That was no less true of the recent seizure of a Venezuelan cargo ship transporting oil to Asia and the imposition of sanctions on six more oil-carrying ships.

Unfortunately, waging war without input from Congress has been the norm in U.S. military interventions of this century. Data generated by the Military Intervention Project at Tufts University indicates that the United States has used military force or engaged in outright warfare 30 times since 2001, with Congress largely on the sidelines. And rarely have those interventions achieved anything like their stated objectives, as documented by the Costs of War Project, which has shown that America’s post-9/11 war on terror has cost at least $8 trillion, involved the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians, and left a huge cohort of U.S. veterans with physical and psychological injuries, all without faintly achieving the stated goals of promoting democracy or stability in the targeted nations.

End endless wars?

Despite its increasingly aggressive posture in the Western Hemisphere (and on U.S. soil), some analysts hold out hope that the Trump administration will ultimately reduce the frequency of U.S. military intervention globally and perhaps even “end endless wars.” There is rhetoric in the new strategy document that could support such a notion, but the real question is whether the president will act on it in any meaningful way.

Judging by its rhetoric alone, the administration’s strategy document would seem to suggest at least an implicit reduction in the use of force overseas, as evidenced in its discussion of strategy:

“A strategy must evaluate, sort, and prioritize. Not every country, region, issue, or cause — however worthy — can be the focus of American strategy…American strategies since the end of the Cold War have fallen short — they have been laundry lists of wishes or desired end states; have not clearly defined what we want but instead stated vague platitudes.”

The document then goes further, seeming to denounce the American war machine and the drive for U.S. military dominance globally:
“After the end of the Cold War, American foreign policy elites convinced themselves that permanent American domination of the entire world was in the best interests of our country… Our elites badly miscalculated America’s willingness to shoulder forever global burdens to which the American people saw no connection to the national interest. They overestimated America’s ability to fund, simultaneously, a massive welfare-regulatory-administrative state alongside a massive military, diplomatic, intelligence, and foreign aid complex.”

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth reinforced such themes in a Dec. 6 speech at the Reagan National Defense Forum, while highlighting the administration’s usual condemnations of efforts to reduce discrimination in the military or this country or address climate change. As he summed it up, “The War Department will not be distracted by democracy building, interventionism, undefined wars, regime change, climate change, moralizing and feckless nation building.”

Taken seriously, such observations would lead to a sharp reduction in the American global military footprint of 750 foreign bases, more than 170,000 troops deployed overseas, a Navy designed to support combat anywhere in the world, dozens of ongoing “counterterror” operations globally from Somalia to Yemen, and arms-supplying relationships with more than half the nations on earth.

Needless to say, so far that hasn’t happened, whether a Republican or a Democrat was at the helm of the administration. But as with President Trump’s professions of being a peacemaker or his occasional rhetorical jabs at “war profiteers” and “warmongers,” the anti-interventionist language in some of the administration’s new National Security Strategy is clearly aimed mainly at those parts of the president’s base here at home who are indeed sick of war and skeptical of large corporations and the “deep state.”

All too sadly, President Donald Trump, Secretary of “War” Hegseth, and the rest of the crew seem all too willing to make war in the Western Hemisphere in a significant fashion, while essentially ignoring the U.S. military’s other warring activities elsewhere on the planet. (Only recently, for instance, U.S. Africa Command confirmed that it had launched 111 airstrikes in Somalia in 2025.) And whether Trump supporters here at home are willing or in any fashion able to hold Trump to his antiwar rhetoric and blunt his penchant for using military force remains to be seen.

Fight for peace

To resist and reverse the militarization of American foreign policy will mean speaking truth to power, while working to debunk the myths that rationalize this country’s permanent war footing. But it will also require confronting power with power by generating a broad people’s movement against militarism in all its manifestations, including the militarization of foreign policy, immigration enforcement, and policing in this country, as well as the military’s role in generating staggering amounts of greenhouse gases and so accelerating climate change and threatening public health.

There are people and organizations fighting on all those fronts. Building a network of resistance that respects the priorities of each of them will take dedicated organizing and relationship-building. Much of that work is already underway. But the question remains: Can the public interest overcome the special interests and bankrupt ideologies that continue to make war and the threat of more war America’s face to the world? It’s a question on which none of us can afford to remain neutral.

William D. Hartung is a Senior Research Fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, and the author most recently of "Pathways to Pentagon Spending Reductions: Removing the Obstacles."


Opinion: Trump, Greenland, battleships, and surrounding Canada on 3 sides — Won’t work

ByPaul Wallis
EDITOR AT LARGE
DIGITAL JOURNAL
December 25, 2025


Trump has repeatedly threatened to take over Greenland - Copyright AFP/File Juliette PAVY

On the subject of defense, Trump excels himself – At being Trump. All the proposals are melodramatic, grandiose, obsolete, and incredibly expensive. If you think what he did to the East Wing with a totally unnecessary ballroom was bad, this is far worse although equally obscene.

Let’s start with Greenland. The idea that the US needs Greenland for “national security” is absurd. In the 1950s, the US had a forward presence in Greenland until they decided that they didn’t need it even back then. Modern combat systems aren’t geo-dependent. Nor are strike capabilities. The US Navy doesn’t need to freeze its tail off to manage its role in the North Atlantic, either.

Administering a hot dog stand in Greenland, let alone a full-scale defense presence, would be astronomically expensive and administratively impossibly cumbersome. A US base in Greenland would become an automatic target with massive demands for core-level security for the base. Exactly how useful a Greenland base right next to a totally antagonized Canada and Europe can be is also highly debatable.

Battleships, you say? No. The general consensus is that major units are “drone bait” and instant high priority targets and will definitely be attacked. The Black Sea fleet would be safer. These things would need a fleet of chaperones to get out of New York harbor.
The battleship USS ARIZONA sinking after being hit by Japanese air attack on Dec. 7,1941.
Source – US National Archives, Public Domain

This rosy view also overlooks the fact that the US Navy is having a hard time managing its current construction and modernization. Creating a massive new unit with untold numbers of new systems, components, and maintenance requirements is suicidal. Add nuclear systems, and it’s much worse.

The US Navy now has any number of good, irrefutable reasons and excuses to “go lean”, reduce the logistics burden, and modernize for survivable modern combat needs. This idea is the exact opposite. Big money for contractors, absolutely no use for anyone else, is the verdict.

It’s a costly glass jaw you can bring with you when getting into the ring with Muhammad Ali.

There’s no depth of strategic thinking or any semblance of understanding of tactical realities. The science, materials, and tech are there to deliver real strategic and tactical advantages without committing to idiotic platforms. An unmanned go-cart with a few Harpoon missiles makes more sense than these anything but viable monstrosities.

It’s fairly easy to argue that these proposals are the diametric opposite of any practical US military policy. The entire US military could be diverted from anything remotely practical by these “digressions into futility,” and so could the defense budget for decades to come.

Now we get to Canada. A US-owned Greenland puts US sovereign territory on three sides of Canada. The Canadians won’t like it, and the Danes and Greenlanders definitely already don’t.

Former central bank chief Mark Carney led Canada’s Liberals to victory in April 2025 elections after longtime prime minister Justin Trudeau resigned – Copyright AFP/File ANDREJ IVANOV

Canada couldn’t possibly have made it clearer that after the “51st state” debacle, that all bets are off. Trump has managed to thoroughly antagonize America’s longstanding ally in two words. Not two centuries. If the past was Manifest Destiny, this is Manifest Dumbness.

America’s allies have been patronized and insulted to the point of total refusal to cooperate. America’s credibility is tanking. The Five Eyes intelligence operation works better when one of them isn’t hallucinating non-existent threats all the time. NATO has basically written off US involvement in anything, at least for now.

Deploying major fleet units to Venezuela hardly helps. A non-threat that could easily be managed by the Coast Guard suddenly needs the Navy? Nobody believes that for a second. Wasting expensive ammo on barely credible threats while probably violating maritime law is simply ludicrous.

Forget it. All of it.

______________________________________________________________

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed in this Op-Ed are those of the author. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the Digital Journal or its members.


Conservative Denmark lawmaker mocks Trump's push to take over Greenland


Carl Gibson
December 25, 2025 
ALTERNET

President Donald Trump's ongoing efforts to make Greenland a part of the United States are being met with ridicule — even from a high-ranking conservative member of Denmark's parliament.

In a Thursday post to his official X account, Rasmus Jarlov (a member of Denmark's Conservative Party representing Greater Copenhagen) celebrated the news that third quarter GDP growth in Denmark was more than twice that of the United States, with the Danes experiencing 9.5 percent growth compared to 4.3 percent in the U.S.

"Not that we are satisfied, but the current growth rate in Denmark is decent," Jarlov tweeted. "We will start buying USA states shortly."

Jarlov's post poking fun at Trump comes just days after the president appointed Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry (R) as his administration's newest special envoy to Greenland. Landry accepted the role, but made a point of telling his constituents in a social media post that he was not abandoning his duties as the Bayou State's governor.

IPaper columnist Simon Marks observed that the president's announcement set off alarm bells in Denmark, which has dominion over Greenland (though Greenland has its own parliament). In a joint statement, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and Greenland Parilament chairman Frederik Nielsen both reminded the Trump administration that "land borders and the sovereignty of states are rooted in international law."

"You cannot annex other countries. Not even with an argument about international security. Greenland belongs to the Greenlanders … We expect respect for our territorial integrity."

Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen also piled on, with Marks observing that he was "deeply angered" about Landry's appointment, calling it "unacceptable." Denmark has reportedly summoned U.S. Ambassador to Denmark Ken Howery to Copenhagen to discuss Trump's plans for Greenland.

While Greenland's population is sparse, with just under 57,000 residents, the territory itself is rich in mineral deposits. Reuters reported earlier this year that Greenland was rich with 25 of 34 minerals classified as "critical raw minerals" by the European Commission,

A FAVOURITE XMAS SONG

MERRY CHRISTMAS MR. LAWRENCE 




Listen to Queen’s previously-unreleased Christmas song 'Not For Sale (Polar Bear)'



Copyright AP Photo
By David Mouriquand
Published on 25/12/2025 - EURONEWS

The song was recorded during the sessions for 1974's 'Queen II' and has now been played for the first time. It will feature on the 2026 reissue of the band’s second album.

Just in time for Christmas...

Queen have released a never-before-heard Christmas song, titled ‘Not For Sale (Polar Bear)’.

It was recorded in 1974 during the sessions for the band’s second album, ‘Queen II’.

The song, featuring Queen guitarist Brian May and the late Freddy Mercury on lead vocals, never made the final cut and remained unreleased for five decades. Until now.

May played the song for the first time during a special broadcast on Planet Rock radio station earlier this week, and shared that it goes back a very long way, but to my knowledge, no one has ever heard this version.”


Check it out below:





May said: "People might possibly have heard a bootleg version of Not for Sale (Polar Bear) by Smile (his previous band), it’s a song that goes back a very long way, but to my knowledge no one has ever heard this version. It’s a work in progress and will appear on the forthcoming rebuild of the Queen II album - coming next year – but I’m sneaking this into my Planet Rock special because I’m fascinated to know what people think about it. I hope people have a wonderful Christmas and a great New Year!"

‘Not For Sale (Polar Bear)’ will feature in the upcoming 2026 reissue of 'Queen II'.

Earlier this year, music licensing company Phonographic Performance Limited (PPL) announced that Queen was the most-played rock act on UK radio and TV in the 21st century.