Wednesday, September 24, 2025

AMERIKAN PROTESTANTS

Sourdough and submission in the name of God: How tradwife content fuses femininity with anti-feminist ideas


(The Conversation) — Tradwives influencers’ throw-back aesthetics mask a divisive ideology about women’s roles, two scholars of extremism explain.


Tradwives' content, from recipes to makeup tips, often appeals to a wider audience than their views on religion, politics and gender.
 (shironosov/iStock via Getty Images Plus)

Catherine Jarry and Arie Perliger
September 22, 2025
(The Conversation)


When people think about online misogyny, they probably envision forums and video game chat rooms filled with young men using lewd language, promoting sexist stereotypes and longing for the good old days when women “knew” their place. Arguably the most popular anti-feminist content today, though, is produced by women: tradwives.

The term “tradwife” is an abbreviation of “traditional wife” – often portrayed on these platforms as a white, married, stay-at-home mother. Since the mid-2000s, tradwives have developed a substantial online presence and following, introducing their lifestyle and views to masses of women.

Many viewers are introduced to tradwife content through videos on cooking or decorating – posts that could appeal to a wide audience. But at the core of the tradwives movement are more divisive beliefs: that women are meant to “submit” to their husband’s leadership, for example, or are not meant to work outside the home.

We define misogyny as hatred, prejudice or hostility directed toward women as a group. Many tradwives argue that their lifestyle empowers women to fulfill their true role. Yet some content in the tradwife landscape is indeed rooted in misogynistic beliefs that women are, in some ways, less capable than men. And much more “trad” content is directly opposed to feminist ideas, such the importance of women’s economic independence and sexual freedom.

A growing number of academics and news reports have highlighted tradwives’ growing cultural influence. There’s been less attention, however, on one of the most prominent features distinguishing them from other misogynist online movements: the role of religious beliefs.

As researchers of extremism, we have been working on a new book about the contemporary landscape of misogyny, examining movements such as “incels” and “men’s rights” activists, as well as chauvinist far-right groups such as the Proud Boys.

As part of our research, we analyzed hundreds of tradwife social media posts, videos and blogs. We assert that tradwife culture is not just aiming to restore “traditional” gender roles. It is also an important force in formulating a new model of womanhood: one that incorporates strong religious identity, a specific feminine aesthetic, and far-right ideas.

Filtered femininity

Tradwives create content that fuses what they call “traditional” and “feminine” lifestyles. Specifically, they tend to emphasize the importance of a wife’s submissiveness to her husband, immersion in conservative Christian values, and support for causes such as anti-abortion advocacy. Yet “tradwife’ content spans a broad spectrum: Some influencers focus on relatively apolitical topics like baking and parenting, while others combine those with more ideologically charged content.

In addition, tradwives stress self-sufficient homemaking skills, such as eating homemade and unprocessed food. At times, that emphasis on “wholesomeness” or living “naturally” includes skepticism about mainstream health care, as well as touting “naturopathic” or alternative medicine.

One of the main reasons so many viewers are attracted to the tradlife content is their nostalgic and calming aesthetic, including a focus on cottage-core content: quaint scenes that evoke life on the prairie, capitalizing on viewers’ nostalgia and desire for escapism.



Influencers’ cozy aesthetic masks the hours of work behind posts and clips.
Galina Zhigalova/Moment via Getty Images

This type of soft-living content is inviting and relaxing. Loose wavy hair, fresh homemade cooking and a farmhouse aesthetic bring to mind “Little House on the Prairie” and help viewers forget the crises of the world outside. We can’t help but feel like we are in the influencer’s kitchen, smelling freshly baked bread and hearing the laughter of children frolicking about.

Yet nothing about tradlife content is effortless. The filters and glamour of Instagram never reflect the hours influencers spend setting up their homes, testing recipes, buying filming equipment and fixing up their appearance for these videos, as shown in countless “get ready with me” videos.

Nevertheless, tradwives often glorify the idea of women’s helplessness,. Some encourage women to focus on what tradwives call “pink jobs,” such as homemaking or child-rearing tasks, not physically demanding “blue jobs,” such as house repairs or extensive landscaping.

In tradwives’ narrative, women aren’t “wired” or “made” to be in the workforce or to be the breadwinner. It is not only too demanding, some of these influencers argue, but actually against nature and God’s intentions to try to “have it all.”

Faith and submission

Most tradwife influencers who talk about faith are Christians of one denomination or another, including Catholics and members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. During analysis for our forthcoming book, we analyzed language in a sample of 23 videos from the seven most popular influencers and found that “God” was the fourth-most popular term – following “women,” “life” and “husband.”

For many influencers, religious piety is a crucial component of their views on gender and convincing viewers to embrace them – particularly their belief that a wife’s fundamental role is to let God and her husband lead the way. Thus, while they don’t necessarily see men and women as unequal, they believe men and women have different roles and different abilities.

Insisting that God is on their side also enhances influencers’ sense of community with their followers, making some platforms almost seem like a parish. They will emphasize specific biblical verses supporting the norms they advocate – such as Titus 2:5, which they interpret as advising women to stay at home; and Genesis 1:28, in which God commands humans to “be fruitful, and multiply.”

“Womanhood is not a man-made idea constructed from ancient traditions and cultural trends,” the sisters behind the YouTube channel “Girl Definedwrite in their book, “Made to be She: Reclaiming God’s Plan for Fearless Femininity.” “It’s a God-designed reality that He established from the beginning of time.”

Political voice

Some tradwife influencers focus on household management and religious content, while others are bolder in their political commentary – from simple TikToks to hours of live-streamed podcasts with guest speakers discussing hot-button issues. One frequent theme is opposition to abortion, especially since the overturning of Roe v. Wade in 2022.

The LGBTQ+ rights debate and related questions about how to define a woman have also become a focus for many tradwives, who argue only God can assign gender, and that it is synonymous with biological sex.



Conservative Christian teachings are often key in how tradwife influencers explain their view of gender roles.
SDI Productions/E+ via Getty Images

In some cases, tradwives’ advocacy extends to white nationalism and nativism. For example, some tradwives will justify the virtue of a large family by alluding to the importance of maintaining a white, Christian majority in the United States.
Modern anxiety

Much of tradwives’ messaging revolves around cultural flash points, problems that underscore anxiety about modern womanhood: challenges in forming stable relationships, providing nutritious meals, and building a career while trying to raise a family. One popular video on the Girls Defined channel, less than a minute long, warns viewers about birth control, Planned Parenthood, feminism and mood stabilizers. “Women, through all the years of feminism, through all the years of freedom, women are more depressed, more anxious, hurting more than ever,” one of the sisters says, “and what we are being told to do is not working.”

These challenges are presented as inevitable consequences of abandoning divinely ordained feminine roles – positioning religious tradwives’ messages as not merely personal opinions, but sacred truths. Any effort to counter misogynist messaging on these platforms, we argue, cannot just rely on facts, but exposing followers to other visions of what it means to be a religious woman.

(Arie Perliger, Director of Security Studies and Professor of Criminology and Justice Studies, UMass Lowell. Catherine Jarry, Doctoral Student in Criminology and Criminal Justice, UMass Lowell. The views expressed in this commentary do not necessarily reflect those of Religion News Service.)


The Conversation religion coverage receives support through the AP’s collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The Conversation is solely responsible for this content.
CRIMINAL CATHOLICISM
Witness-tampering allegations turn spotlight from Becciu to Vatican prosecutor

(RNS) — The Vatican appeals court admitted a defense bid to recuse prosecutor Alessandro Diddi, shifting the spotlight from Becciu to the conduct of the prosecution itself.


Cardinal Angelo Becciu attends a consistory inside St. Peter’s Basilica, at the Vatican, on Aug. 27, 2022. (AP Photo/Andrew Medichini, File)

Claire Giangravé
September 23, 2025

VATICAN CITY (RNS) — Cardinal Angelo Becciu, who was convicted of fraud and embezzlement and sentenced to 5 ½ years in prison by a Vatican court, appealed his case on Monday and Tuesday (Sept. 22-23).

Becciu, formerly the third-highest-ranking prelate at the Vatican, and eight others were found guilty in a 2023 Vatican megatrial revolving around a controversial purchase of real estate in London using Catholic funds that were partially destined for the pope’s charitable causes. As they brought their case before the six judges of the Vatican Court of Appeal this week, the defense moved to recuse the Vatican prosecutor Alessandro Diddi, accusing him of judicial meddling during the original trial.

On Monday, the Vatican appeals court accepted the motion of admissibility of the recusal. Diddi will have three days to respond, or his case will be brought before the Vatican’s highest court of appeal, the Court of Cassation, composed of four cardinal members. Until then, Diddi said he will not attend the hearings.

“Finally, I have the possibility to defend myself from a series of insinuations,” Diddi told the court. “I want to take advantage of the three-day period to express my considerations calmly, in order to dissolve the doubts that in these months have been raised about the conduct of the investigation.”

More than 3,200 pages of WhatsApp messages between Francesca Chaouqui and Genevieve Ciferri suggest the two conspired to coach Monsignor Alberto Perlasca, the prosecution’s star witness, on his testimony. Chaouqui, a former member of the Vatican’s commission for economic reform, was previously accused in 2015 of leaking sensitive documents.

Perlasca, who had been a longtime aid for Becciu when the cardinal was head of the Vatican Secretariat of State’s administrative office, offered key testimony during the trial. According to the defendants, Diddi operated behind the scenes through Chaouqui and Ciferri to manipulate Perlasca. According to the defendants, the messages raise doubt about Diddi’s impartiality.

“With his intervention this morning, Professor Diddi has personalized the Becciu trial, transforming it into a matter that involves his office and perhaps the entire judicial institution,” said Cataldo Intrieri, the lawyer of the financier Raffaele Mincione, after Monday’s hearing. “Does he not realize he risks turning the Becciu trial into the ‘Diddi affair’?” he added.

The “Diddi affair” also risks becoming a catalyst for the broader accusations that have been made against the Vatican judicial system, with defendants criticizing its lack of transparency, its dated legal norms and the ways it is subject to the pope. During the investigations into the controversial London property deal, Pope Francis intervened at least four times with decrees to strengthen the power of the prosecutors and reform financial oversight.

If the Court of Cassation upholds the recusal it would be a significant blow to the prosecution and it would also call into question the validity of the initial trial. Diddi has been involved with the Becciu trial for years and is familiar with the history and legalities of the case. In a 2021 decree, Pope Francis updated the code of criminal procedure to clarify that the office of the promoter of justice is present at all three levels of judgment, including appeal.

During the second day of trial, the court focused on procedural objections raised by the defense and prosecution. Discussions centered on the Vatican’s 1913 Code of Criminal Procedure, along with email and paper findings. The defense also argued that the prosecutor’s office mishandled the deadlines and format of its own appeal, meaning that if the judges agree, the prosecutor’s appeal might be considered invalid. This would make the appeal trial much shorter, focusing solely on the convictions.

The next trial date has been scheduled for Thursday.

Texts reveal behind-the-scenes maneuvering of the Vatican’s ‘trial of the century’

VATICAN CITY (AP) — Their four years of conversations, from 2020-2024, provide a parallel, behind-the-scenes version of one of the most tumultuous periods in Vatican history, when Pope Francis authorized a trial of 10 people, including a cardinal, into alleged financial misconduct.




Nicole Winfield
September 22, 2025

VATICAN CITY (AP) — In the last two years, defense lawyers have acquired 3,225 pages of WhatsApp messages between two women who were tangential to the Vatican’s “trial of the century,” but were actually intimately aware of the investigation and in some ways involved.

Their four years of conversations, from 2020-2024, provide a parallel, behind-the-scenes version of one of the most tumultuous periods in Vatican history, when Pope Francis authorized a trial of 10 people, including a cardinal, into alleged financial misconduct.

The chats, written in Italian and translated here by The Associated Press, suggest that these two women helped persuade one of the original prime suspects in the case, Monsignor Alberto Perlasca, to change his story and turn on his former boss, Cardinal Angelo Becciu. Perlasca was spared indictment; Becciu was convicted.

According to the chats, first reported on by Domani newspaper and published by other Italian media, public relations specialist Francesca Chaouqui implied to Perlasca family friend Genevieve Ciferri that she enjoyed close contact with Vatican investigators and Francis, and wanted to help Perlasca. She assured Ciferri that everyone from the pope on down knew and approved of their maneuvering to help Perlasca feel supported so he would implicate Becciu.

Key text exchanges

Ciferri feared that Chaouqui was just boasting and on May 19, 2024, she demanded Chaouqui reassure her that police, Prosecutor Alessandro Diddi and Francis all “knew and agreed on your collaboration with the investigations, and in particular had direct knowledge of the collaboration you established with me.”

Chaouqui assures her they were in agreement but warned: “If it gets out that we all agreed, it’s the end.”

Ciferri: “Please be clear, you understand how important it is for me to be fully convinced. Because you know the doubts and skepticism to which, due to my weakness and insecurity, I have always been subject during our relationship, which has now turned into affection. Are you confirming that all the people I mentioned, including the Holy Father, were in agreement and aware of everything? And are you confirming that you have never lied to me about anything? And do you also make me understand how serious it could be for the trial if both you and Prof. Diddi are found to have lied shamelessly during the proceedings? Because then I too would agree that for the good of the church, it would be better to put a tombstone on it!”

Chaouqui: “You have to distinguish between two levels.”

Ciferri: “I don’t understand …”

Chaouqui: “The level of truth where everyone from the pope down knew what we were doing. And the other level, which is the trial level. Where we have to claim that no one knew, because if we all knew, the trial is null and void and it’s a conspiracy. Understand?”

Ciferri: “Okay, now I understand. I will act accordingly, nothing to fear. Thank you, Francesca, that’s all.”

In a text message to The Associated Press, Diddi declined to comment on the chats. “The trial is the venue where the adversarial process must take place,” he wrote. Chaouqui declined to comment.

In a statement to AP, Ciferri said the chats were of no importance to the appeals trial itself. She said they were instead a “collateral” affair that is being investigated separately, after she filed complaints with Vatican prosecutors against Chaouqui for what she called “psychological manipulation and suffering.”

“Continuing to exaggerate the importance of the chat messages makes no sense and is only a useless pretext, while the appeal will be based on the actual crimes and the individual responsibilities of each person for each count,” Ciferri wrote.

An audio file reveals more

In April, Italy’s Domani newspaper produced an audio file purportedly of the Vatican’s police commissioner, Stefano De Santis, giving instructions to Chaouqui about what Perlasca should say in his revised round of questioning, in August 2020. At the time, Perlasca was still a suspect and had submitted to a first round of questioning in which he defended Becciu.

After he turned on Becciu, he became a key prosecution witness.

In the audio, De Santis suggests Perlasca discuss two other defendants who were eventually convicted: money manager Enrico Crasso and Perlasca’s deputy, Fabrizio Tirabassi.

“Francesca, given that he is in possession of the interrogation report, because he had a copy of it, he should read it and underline all the points where, in light of recent events, in light of recent facts, in light of the introspective work he has done within himself, he needs to clarify, just to qualify facts and acts that do not concern him, but concern others; just to say, once and for all, how the system of Crasso and Tirabassi in the years when he was head of the office developed in a way that he certainly found, having arrived after Crasso and after Tirabassi, but which he cannot fail to know about. In other words, he should take inspiration from that interrogation, from those questions, and clarify all those points and all the ‘I don’t knows’ he said at that time.”

The Vatican hasn’t disputed the authenticity of the audio or commented on its contents.
__
Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP’s collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.
What does Pope Leo XIV want? 10 takeaways from his first interviews

(RNS) — In his first in-depth interviews since his election, Pope Leo XIV set out his vision for the Catholic Church: open to dialogue yet firm on doctrine.


Pope Leo XIV leaves at the end of his audience for operators of justice in St. Peter’s Square at the Vatican, Sept. 20, 2025. (AP Photo/Alessandra Tarantino)

Claire Giangravé
September 24, 2025

VATICAN CITY (RNS) — In two wide-ranging interviews with Crux Vatican reporter Elise Ann Allen, Pope Leo XIV addressed some of the most pressing questions facing his pontificate and the Catholic Church, including the wars in Gaza and Ukraine, the welcoming of LGBTQ people in the church and how he plans to address the Trump presidency in his native United Sates.

What emerged from the interviews is a portrait of a pope who is cautious and favors listening, while still willing to draw a firm line on doctrine and priorities. “I am not trying to continue promoting polarization in the Church” is a phrase he repeats often and in different contexts, befitting the ancient Latin papal moniker pontifex: bridge-builder.

RELATED: In first interview, Pope Leo XIV takes on billionaires, polarization and war

Leo XIV is not naive about the Holy See’s limited power to intervene, especially in war, nor does he undersell the acute difficulties of the church’s finances or its internal divisions. He offers as an antidote a true missionary spirit, honed in his many years ministering in Peru, coupled with Pope Francis’ appeal to build a poor church for the poor

“I don’t see my main role as trying to be the problem-solver of the world,” Leo told Crux, “although I do believe the Church has a voice, a message that needs to continue to be preached, to be spoken and spoken loudly.”

So far, the silent and smiling pope has been like a Rorschach test, a blurry image where anyone can see or imagine whatever they hope in this new pontificate. But these first interviews offer a premiere look behind the veil and a glimpse into what Pope Leo XIV is really about.

Excerpts from the interviews were first published on Sept. 14 on the Catholic news site Crux. The full interviews are available in Spanish in Allen’s new book, “Leo XIV: Citizen of the World, Missionary of the XXI Century,” which will be published in English and Portuguese in 2026.

On the U.S. bishops: Under Francis, the Vatican relationship with U.S. bishops was often described as tense. Leo, who was born and raised in Chicago, made clear in his interview that he expects fewer misunderstandings. “The fact that I’m American means, among other things, that people can’t say, as they did with Francis, ‘he doesn’t understand the United States, he just doesn’t see what’s happening,’” Leo said, showing that he is keenly aware of the issues that existed in the past. As the former head of the Vatican department overseeing bishops, Leo also has insider knowledge of the American bishops’ priorities and concerns.

The pope said he would speak to the bishops directly and pointed to Francis’ letter, sent in late February encouraging the U.S. episcopate to advocate for migrants and refugees.




Official portrait of Pope Leo XIV. (Photo © Vatican Media)

On President Donald Trump: The pope stressed that he has no intention of being sucked into partisan politics and will leave it to bishops to engage with the Trump administration, but said, “I’m not afraid to raise issues that I believe are true issues of the Gospel, which I hope people on both sides of the aisle, as we say, can hear.”

It’s up to the U.S. bishops, Leo said, to engage with the Trump presidency “very seriously.” While he noted that some of the things that are happening in the United States “are a cause of concern,” Leo also said that he is willing to work with Trump “especially on questions of human dignity, of promoting peace in the world.”

Gaza and Israel: Addressing the violence and war in Gaza, Leo voiced concern for the lack of effective solutions to help innocent civilians. He recognized that the lasting effects of famine, especially for young people, cannot be quickly resolved by delivering aid, but require medical attention and rehabilitation.

“It’s so horrible to see the images on television, I wish something would change this situation,” he said, adding that he hopes the world will not become desensitized by the sight of so much pain. As Christians, he added, people have a responsibility to continue working to bring about change in the region.

Leo recognized that the term “genocide” is being used “more and more” about the civilian deaths in Gaza, but he said the Holy See cannot make an official statement until the status is determined by the international community. Acknowledging that a growing number of human rights groups and individual are raising the issue, he said, “there is a very technical definition of what a genocide might be.”

This position is aligned with Francis, who in 2024 deferred the question to an international inquiry about whether the term “genocide” can be used to describe the plight of the Palestinian people.

But Leo called rekindling relations with the Jewish community a priority, saying that they have already “improved a little” in the first months of his pontificate. “It is important to make some distinctions that they themselves make between what the Government of Israel is doing and who the members of the Jewish community are,” he said.

Women deacons: Leo confirmed his intention to promote women leaders in the church but drew a clear line at the ordination of women to the diaconate, a question that had been raised at recent summits of bishops at the Vatican. Deacons can preach from the pulpit and perform some sacraments but can’t celebrate the Eucharist, hear confessions or anoint the sick.

“I think it will continue to be a problem. I, for the moment, do not intend to change the teaching of the Church on the matter. I think there are some previous questions that need to be asked,” he said.




Pope Leo XIV poses with women at the end of his first weekly general audience in St. Peter’s Square at the Vatican, May 21, 2025. (AP Photo/Alessandra Tarantino)

Echoing his immediate predecessors, Leo framed women’s ordination as a question of clericalism — it risks treating members of the clergy, male or female, as more important than lay Catholics. He said that before women could occupy the role of deacon, the church would need to establish in church culture a better understanding of the permanent diaconate — as opposed to a way station before priesthood, as it currently is in the church.

LGBTQ+ inclusion: Leo used the interview to put himself in line with Francis’ call that the church be open to all Catholics, while not budging on doctrine. “I think we have to change attitudes, before even thinking about changing what the Church says about any given question,” he said. “It seems very unlikely to me, certainly in the near future, that the Church’s doctrine will change in terms of what it teaches about sexuality and marriage.”

Families, he said, are made up of a man, a woman and children. He pushed back against those who said the Vatican’s 2023 doctrinal document on the blessing of people with same-sex attractions, “Fiducia Supplicans” (Supplicating Trust), was tantamount to blessing gay couples’ relationships. “The teaching of the Church will continue as it is, and that is what I have to say about it for now,” he said.

China: Catholic conservatives were disturbed by Francis’ signing of a 2018 agreement between China and the Holy See. While the document’s content remains secret, it has been described as allowing Beijing to have a significant say in the appointment of bishops, normally the prerogative of the pope.

Leo said that for the short term he plans on observing the agreement as is but that he has already had conversations with members of the officially recognized church in China and of the so-called underground church that operates illegally in the country with recognition from Rome.

Latin Mass: Conservatives widely resent the restrictions placed by Francis on the Old Rite, known as the Tridentine Mass, in his 2021 apostolic letter “Traditiones Custodes” (Guardians of the Tradition). Leo said he has already received many requests on the issue since becoming pope, and he said the issue is “very complicated.”

Leo blames polarization in the church for the tensions surrounding liturgy, adding that the Tridentine Mass has become for some “a political tool.” He recognized that the “abuse” of the liturgy after the Second Vatican Council, which sought to reconcile the church with the society of the 1960s, may have left some seeking “a deeper experience of prayer, of contact with the mystery of faith.”

But the pope said those who advocate for the Tridentine Rite have refused to engage in dialogue with the Vatican on this issue. “It means that we are now in ideology, we are no longer in the experience of the communion of the Church,” he said, adding that the topic is being studied by a group of experts and theologians at the Vatican.

Building a better church: Francis ushered in a wave of reform of the Roman curia, the Vatican bureaucracy. Leo said he plans to continue the reform effort enshrined in the 2022 apostolic constitution “Praedicate Evangelium” (Preach the Gospel) and will also make some changes.

Among them is promoting better systems of communications among the Vatican departments, which often work as monoliths with rare instances of collaboration. He claimed that the Vatican’s famously troubled finances are not as bad as some have stated, adding that “it doesn’t keep me up at night.”



Pope Leo XIV tours St. Peter’s Square on his popemobile prior to the inaugural Mass of his pontificate, May 18, 2025, at the Vatican. (AP Photo/Domenico Stinellis)

In his papacy, Francis increasingly emphasized synodality, an approach to church governance based in dialogue, inclusion and the promotion of laypeople in the church. Leo supports the concept, telling Crux, “A leader who walks alone is not leading anyone, but if a leader is capable of bringing people together and moving forward together, that is much more effective.”

A better church for Leo also includes outreach to other denominations. He intends to invite many leaders of religions and Christian denomination to meet him in Nicaea, Turkey, in late November, where he will mark the 1700th anniversary of the Council of Nicaea and the formulation of the Nicene Creed.

He also said he plans to build bridges with the Orthodox Church in Russia, with the hope of promoting dialogue between the Patriarch of Constantinople and the Patriarch of Moscow, who have been at odds in light of the war in Ukraine and friction within the Orthodox faiths. Leo said “some steps” have been taken toward finding a common date for Easter among all Christian denominations.

Clergy sexual abuse: The pope said the church’s abuse crisis is one of the main concerns of his papacy. He is pushing for faster trials while preserving the presumption of innocence for accused priests. Most of all, he vowed that victims and survivors would be heard and treated with respect and dignity.

Artificial intelligence: In his short tenure, Leo has already discussed artificial intelligence several times and it promises to be a matter of great interest in his pontificate. He advocates for caution about the technology’s rapid development and offered the church’s long history of considering the human condition to the world’s discussion about its limits and uses.

“The Church is not against the advances of technology, at all, but losing the relationship between faith and scientific reason, I think leaves science as an empty, cold shell, that will do great harm to humanity,” he said.

He also spoke about AI’s role in advancing fake news and conspiracy theories. “There is a truth, authentic truth,” that cannot be bent to alternative visions or perspectives, he told Crux. On the other hand, Leo said, are AI-generated videos that show him falling, and those asking to create an AI avatar of Leo that can offer spiritual answers. “If there’s anyone who shouldn’t be represented by an avatar, it seems to me, it’s the pope,” he said.

Throughout the interview, Leo described himself as charged with the main purpose of guiding the attention of the lost and lonely humanity toward God and the heavens. He said that as the church celebrates the Jubilee of Hope this year, he finds himself “full of hope” despite the challenges, “because that is really what the Church represents, we have so much to offer the world.”

Eastern Orthodox leader meets with Trump, advocates for Ukraine on US visit

(RNS) — During his visit, Bartholomew I is set to accept the 2025 Templeton Prize in recognition of his environmental advocacy that's earned him the moniker 'green patriarch.'



President Donald Trump participates in a bilateral meeting with the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, second right, Monday, Sept. 15, 2025, in the Oval Office. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)


David I. Klein
September 19, 2025


(RNS) — Bartholomew I, the ecumenical patriarch of Constantinople and one of Orthodox Christianity’s most influential leaders, has begun a nearly two-week apostolic visit to the United States that included a meeting with President Donald Trump.


The trip, which began Monday (Sept. 15), is the first in four years for the Istanbul-based church hierarch and his eighth since he was installed in 1991. In addition to meetings with Greek Orthodox Americans, the patriarch spoke before the State Department and with Vice President JD Vance and congressional leaders. Bartholomew will also accept an award for his environmental activism next week.

Under the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, which is an arm of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, the church has some 1.5 million faithful in the U.S., and more than 500 parishes and 20 monasteries.

Trump is the sixth U.S. president he has met. During their hourlong meeting, the two broached many topics, including the assassination of Charlie Kirk, Orthodox-Catholic relations and Turkey’s Christian minority. The patriarch also addressed Trump’s efforts to broker a truce in the Russia-Ukraine war, thanking him for his work toward ending the war.

Bartholomew has been a strong backer of the Ukrainian Orthodox church’s independence from Russia for many years. In 2018, he used his authority as ecumenical patriarch — a role that has historically served as a mediator between the Orthodox world and many independent churches — to formalize Ukrainian Orthodox Christians’ separation from the Russian Orthodox Church and its Moscow-based, and aligned, patriarch. The move sparked a schism between the Moscow Patriarchate, the world’s largest Orthodox church body, and Constantinople.


President Donald Trump participates in a bilateral meeting with the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, Monday, Sept. 15, 2025, in the Oval Office. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

The independence of the Ukrainian church from the Moscow Patriarchate, and the suppression of churches still tied to Moscow, has been a sore point not just for the Russian church but for Russia itself. Several of Russia’s peace proposals call for protecting Russian-aligned churches and banning an independent Ukrainian church.

In an interview with a French television station last week, Bartholomew reiterated his support for the Ukrainian church’s independence.

“The Ecumenical Patriarchate does not intend to revoke its decision to grant autocephaly to Ukraine. I want to clearly state this,” Bartholomew said.

“Our goal is to unite all the Orthodox churches of Ukraine, both those of Metropolitan Onufriy and those of Metropolitan Epiphanius, so that they unite at the theoretical level and in everyday life, become a single local church and be recognized by other sister Orthodox churches,” he continued. “I think that sooner or later, it will happen. We should not expect it to happen overnight. Let us recall that the autocephaly of other churches was also not recognized immediately. It took other Orthodox churches time to realize the autocephaly of the new church. I believe that with God’s grace and the goodwill of the Orthodox sister churches this will happen in the coming years or decades.”



Speaking to the Council on Foreign Relations on Friday (Sept. 19), he doubled down on his criticism of the Russian church, specifically mentioning Russkiy mir, or Russian world, ideology, used to justify the war in Ukraine.

“The Orthodox Church of Russia has given its ringing endorsement to the invasion of Ukraine and the murder of fellow Orthodox Christians by the Putin regime,” he said. “It has done so in service to the outdated and outlandish imperial philosophy of Russkiy mir, which has been growing since the fall of the Soviet Union.”



FILE – Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, left, stands next to Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I, the spiritual leader of the world’s Orthodox Christians, at the Patriarchal Church of St. George in Istanbul, Turkey, Saturday, July 8, 2023. Zelenskyy attended a memorial ceremony for the victims of the war in Ukraine led by Patriarch Bartholomew I. (AP Photo/Francisco Seco)

The patriarch also rejected the intertwining of church, state and nationalism at a dinner hosted by the State Department.

“In times past, religion was used to consolidate peoples around specific governments, giving coherence to earthly empires, kingdoms and nation-states,” he said. “… Has not the human family arrived at a point when such rigid forms of conformity no longer serve the interests of the people? As the ecumenical patriarchate, we seek to foster interreligious dialogue, mutual respect and an understanding of coexistence that often eludes the nations of the world.”

During his meetings with U.S. leaders, Bartholomew also brought attention to Turkey’s Greek-speaking and other Christian minorities. Once home to millions of Christians of various denominations, today, Christians account for less than 1% of Turkey’s population — a result of a turbulent 20th century, which included acts of genocide and ethnic cleansing at the close of World War I and the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire.

While the patriarch was before Congress, Florida Republican Congressman Gus Bilirakis, who is of Greek descent, called on the U.S. to pressure Ankara to reopen the Halki Seminary. A Greek Orthodox theological school on an island off the coast of Istanbul, Halki was the last school to train Christian priests in Turkey before it was closed by the Turkish government in 1971. Since then, its fate has been an important issue for Turkey’s Orthodox Christian minority and a sticking point in Greek-Turkish relations.



Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., right, welcomes the leader of the Orthodox Christian Church, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I, left, for a meeting in the speaker’s office at the Capitol in Washington, Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2025. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Next week, Bartholomew is set to accept the 2025 Templeton Prize, awarded by the U.S.-based John Templeton Foundation, in recognition of his environmental advocacy that has earned him the moniker “green patriarch.” Since his enthronement in 1991, Bartholomew has avidly proclaimed that church leaders have a responsibility to take a stance on environmental issues. He brought scientists and other environmental scholars to Istanbul and other properties of the church for seminars on the subject, stretching back decades.

“For over 30 years, Bartholomew has articulated a compelling moral and theological vision of humanity’s responsibility to care for the Earth and to uphold harmony, unity and mutual love within and across religious communities,” The Templeton Foundation said in April when naming him the recipient of the prize. “He has consistently exhorted people of faith to view their relationship to creation as a sacred duty, arguing that making a false historical divide between the material and spiritual can deny the significance of environmental degradation.”



MAGA'S HORST WESSEL


Charlie Kirk's AI resurrection ushers in a new era of digital grief

“I’m Charlie. My faith cost me my life, but now I stand forever in glory,” the AI-generated Kirk says.


(RNS) — AI-generated versions of the conservative Christian activist are popping up online after his killing — as well as in church services.


Recent AI-generated content of Charlie Kirk found on social media. (RNS illustration)

Jack Jenkins
September 17, 2025

(RNS) — Megachurch pastor Jack Graham was in the middle of his Sunday message to Prestonwood Baptist Church in Plano, Texas, this past weekend when he paused to cue up an unusual sermon illustration. After encouraging people to respond to the killing of conservative Christian activist Charlie Kirk by turning to God, he instructed the congregation to listen to a roughly minute-long audio clip of what sounded like Kirk delivering a short speech.

“Hear what Charlie is saying regarding what happened to him this past week,” Graham said.

As the clip, which encouraged listeners to “pick up your cross, and get back in the fight,” ended, the congregation burst into applause. A few seconds later, they rose to their feet in a standing ovation.

But the clip they listened to was not, in fact, Charlie Kirk from beyond the grave. As Graham made clear when he introduced the segment, the congregation was listening to a production generated entirely by artificial intelligence: The clip, which has gone viral online, was a cloned version of Kirk’s voice delivering what appeared to be an AI-generated response from a chatbot asked what Kirk would say in the wake of his own death.

It’s unclear where the video originated, but at least two other large evangelical Protestant churches — Dream City Church in Arizona and Awaken Church, San Marcos in California — also played it during their services that day. Pastors at both churches made clear the clips were AI; even so, the segment triggered applause each time.

The message was part of a wave of AI-generated content that flooded social media in the wake of Kirk’s killing, with supporters and even Kirk’s former colleagues sharing images, videos and audio messages that featured the felled activist and that were made by artificial intelligence. Amid outrage over Kirk’s killing and debate about his legacy, the surge, which has been most visible on social media platforms, showcased a new form of public mourning and remembrance, one in which the dead are grieved with hyperreal but entirely fictional reconstructions crafted in seconds by AI services.



Congregants listen to AI-generated audio of Charlie Kirk, Sept. 13, 2025, at Prestonwood Baptist Church in Plano, Texas. (Video screen grab)

AI-generated images and videos of Kirk appeared within hours of his death, some growing in popularity over the next few days. Many featured religious themes, a byproduct of Kirk’s own personal and political shift toward evangelical Christianity near the end of his life.

Imagining Kirk in heaven was a common theme. In one clip, which has racked up hundreds of thousands of views on Facebook and X, Kirk stares into a camera as soft piano music plays.

“I’m Charlie. My faith cost me my life, but now I stand forever in glory,” the AI-generated Kirk says.

The fictional Kirk then introduces four historical Christian martyrs and saints — Paul, Stephen, Andrew and Peter. These, also AI-generated characters, briefly recount their own stories of martyrdom before the AI Kirk urges listeners to root themselves in a “Bible-believing church,” join in a “spiritual” battle and “overwhelm the world with Jesus.”

Other clips are shorter, but more direct. One depicts an AI-generated Kirk taking selfies in heaven with prominent Americans who were assassinated, such as Presidents Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy as well as the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. As the digital Kirk poses with the historical icons in a cloudy vista, “Knocking on Heaven’s Door” plays in the background.

Many AI-generated clips depict Kirk with Jesus Christ. One shows Kirk sitting in the same tent where he was shot and killed, but then suddenly leaping out of his chair and running up a staircase to a smiling Jesus. Another features an AI-generated Kirk praying on a park bench as Scripture is flashed across the screen and “Come Jesus Come” by CeCe Winans plays in the background. Eventually, a radiant Jesus arrives, and the two embrace.

Yet another shows Jesus and Kirk, holding a Make America Great Again hat, walking toward the camera among the clouds.

”Welcome, my son,” Jesus says, embracing the AI Kirk. “Your work is done. Come rest.”

Apparent AI-generated images have even been used by Kirk’s former co-workers. Andrew Kolvet, who produced “The Charlie Kirk Show” and has hosted the program multiple times since Kirk’s killing, posted what appears to be an AI-generated image of Kirk alongside other assassinated Americans from U.S. history such as King and Lincoln, as well as Jesus Christ. (The image sparked criticism, with detractors noting that the real-life Kirk criticized King. The Rev. Bernice King, one of Martin Luther King Jr.’s daughters, said of the image, “there are so many things wrong with this.”)


(Screen grab)

Depictions of famous figures in heaven, or even in relationship with Jesus, are hardly unusual. But the particular utilization of AI to commemorate Kirk — with content flooding the internet within hours of his death — may be an outgrowth of the technology’s wide use among devotees of President Donald Trump. That includes the Trump administration itself: On several occasions, AI-generated images and memes have appeared on official government accounts.

As Charlie Warzel, who writes on technology and media, observed in The Atlantic in August, the “high-resolution, low-budget look of generative-AI images appears to be fusing with the meme-loving aesthetic of the MAGA movement.”

Warzel added: “At least in the fever swamps of social media, AI art is becoming MAGA-coded. The GOP is becoming the party of AI slop.”

Kirk, of course, was an avid Trump supporter who played a significant role in helping the president return to power, and some of the AI-generated content that proliferated after the activist’s death has been tied to conservative causes. Many images, for instance, linked Kirk’s death to the stabbing of Iryna Zarutska, a Ukrainian refugee whose slaying on a bus in Charlotte, North Carolina, became a source of outrage for Kirk and other conservatives shortly before Kirk’s own assassination. One widely shared image shows an AI-generated Kirk comforting Zarutska as she sits on the bus where she was killed, bleeding. At least one person created a video version of the image that features the hymn “How Great Thou Art.” A similar AI-generated video shows Kirk embracing Zarutska on the bus as they both flap newly grown angel wings.

Another AI-generated video pushed a pro-Israel message — a topic that has sparked division among conservatives, and which Kirk was reportedly trying to mitigate shortly before his death. In the video, an AI-generated Kirk, adorned with angel wings and a white robe, speaks from heaven as he declares: “I’m in a better place now, but America and Israel will never be the same.” The AI Kirk insists that the U.S. and Israel are both based on “faith, on freedom, on family,” shortly before a bald eagle is shown landing on his head as he stands in front of Israeli and U.S. flags.

Despite their viral nature, it’s unclear precisely what role these virtually enhanced remembrances play in the lives of those who mourn Kirk’s death. But social media boosters of the creations often frame them as a form of catharsis: On TikTok, influencer Taylor Diazmercado posted a short video of herself last week reacting to the AI-generated audio clip of Kirk — which she clearly labeled as such — that would later be used in churches. As an entirely fabricated voice speaks lines Kirk never said in life, Diazmercado can be seen visibly weeping, frequently wiping away tears as she nods along in-between sobs.

Beneath the video, which had 123,000 likes as of Wednesday (Sept. 17), she added a short caption: “What a man.”


At Charlie Kirk's memorial, religion, politics and antagonism toward liberals combine

“I hate my opponent and I don’t want the best for them,” Trump said. 

(RNS) — A who’s who of right-wing figures, conservative dignitaries, Trump administration officials and Trump himself regaled a sprawling crowd of tens of thousands with speeches that mixed religious appeals with personal remembrances of Kirk.



President Donald Trump embraces Erika Kirk at a memorial for conservative activist Charlie Kirk, Sept. 21, 2025, at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Ariz. (AP Photo/John Locher)

Jack Jenkins
September 22, 2025
RNS


(RNS) — Shortly before the speaking program began at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona, on Sunday (Sept. 21) to kick off the massive memorial service honoring conservative activist Charlie Kirk, a group of prominent Christian musicians onstage sang a rendition of the hymn “It Is Well With My Soul.”

As the first notes of song filled the space, thousands of attendees silently began to raise four different signs. Two referenced Scripture, and others referenced Turning Point USA, the political organization Kirk founded. The placards were emblazoned with contrasting colors and assigned to different sections of the crowd, with the ultimate effect of transforming the stadium into precise stripes of red, white and blue — the colors of the American flag, two of which hung on either side of the gargantuan stage.

It was the beginning of what quickly became an unapologetic fusion of conservative Christianity — particularly evangelicalism, Kirk’s chosen religious tradition — and President Donald Trump’s style of conservative politics, sometimes delivered by prominent representatives of the United States government. Over the course of roughly five hours, a who’s who of right-wing figures, conservative dignitaries, Trump administration officials and Trump himself regaled a sprawling crowd of tens of thousands with speeches that mixed religious appeals with personal remembrances of Kirk. In many cases, the speeches also included criticism of liberals and progressives, whom some blamed for Kirk’s death even as investigators have yet to determine an explicitly political motive for the shooter.

The event’s religious and political subtext was ubiquitous from the jump, when the Rev. Rob McCoy — the only clergy member to address the crowd from the podium — opened the program. Explaining that Kirk viewed McCoy, the recently retired pastor of Godspeak Calvary Chapel in Thousand Oaks, California, as his personal pastor, McCoy argued Kirk would have wanted Christianity to be a focus of his memorial.

“Charlie wanted his savior to be the guest of honor,” McCoy said. “He wanted all of you to receive this gift from him.”

After adding that Kirk “saw politics as an on-ramp to Jesus,” McCoy shifted into a kind of altar call, urging people in the crowd to stand if they wanted “to receive Jesus as their savior.” The pastor then directed those standing to use a QR code projected on the screen above him to access resources from TPUSA Faith, a project McCoy helped co-found with Kirk, that would “give you everything you need to walk this walk with Christ,” he said.


The Rev. Rob McCoy speaks at a memorial for conservative activist Charlie Kirk, Sunday, Sept. 21, 2025, at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Ariz. (AP Photo/John Locher)

During the first section of the program, several of Kirk’s former TPUSA co-workers celebrated people they said embraced Christianity as a result of Kirk’s death — a common claim repeated by Kirk’s supporters over the past week.

“Charlie Kirk was a prophet — not the fortunetelling kind that could predict the future, but the biblical kind,” said TPUSA spokesperson Andrew Kolvet, who produced “The Charlie Kirk Show” and regularly appeared on the program alongside Kirk. Kolvet said he now thinks of Kirk’s appearances on college campuses, such as the event in Utah where he was killed, as “tent revivals.”


Faith was also at the center of the address delivered by Erika Kirk, Charlie Kirk’s widow and the newly appointed head of TPUSA. Her emotional address did not avoid politics but contrasted with other speeches by focusing primarily on her relationship with Kirk and pausing to make a powerful point about forgiveness. As tears rolled down her face, Erika, who is Catholic, publicly forgave the man who has been accused of killing her husband earlier this month.

“On the cross, our savior said, ‘Father, forgive them for they not know what they do,’” said Erika Kirk, who wore a cross necklace. “That man, that young man: I forgive him.”




People listen as Erika Kirk, seen on a stadium screen, speaks at a memorial for her late husband conservative activist Charlie Kirk, Sunday, Sept. 21, 2025, at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Ariz. (AP Photo/John Locher)

Her tone was a departure from speeches that filled other sections of the program, in which references to Christianity were directed outward at ideological enemies on the left or speakers openly encouraged the crowd to go after political opponents.

Vice President JD Vance, a Catholic, said Kirk knew “it is better to be persecuted for your faith than to deny the kingship of Christ,” and Vance suggested that the felled activist — who was known for debating political opponents and casting aspersions on those he disagreed with in ways that have been condemned by some faith leaders in other traditions in recent days — would want his political work to continue.

“I think (Kirk) would encourage me to be honest that evil still walks among us — not to ignore it for the sake of a fake kumbaya moment, but to address it head-on,” said Vance, who has credited Kirk with helping him become Trump’s running mate in 2024, and ultimately vice president

Vance was also one of at least five speakers who declared Kirk to be a Christian martyr.

“For Charlie, we must remember that he is a hero to the United States of America and he is a martyr for the Christian faith,” Vance said.

Another speaker, conservative activist Benny Johnson, also called Kirk a martyr and compared him to Stephen, the first Christian martyr described in the Bible. Johnson then encouraged political figures in the crowd to go after their political opponents.

“Rulers wield the sword for the protection of good men and for the terror of evil men,” Johnson said, referencing a passage from the biblical Book of Romans. “May we pray that our rulers here, rightfully instituted and given power by our God, wield the sword for the terror for evil men in our nation in Charlie’s memory.”



Jack Posobiec holds up a rosary as he speaks at a memorial for conservative activist Charlie Kirk, Sunday, Sept. 21, 2025, at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Ariz. (AP Photo/John Locher)

Jack Posobiec, a far-right activist and conspiracy theorist who regularly appeared on Kirk’s podcast, began his speech by walking onstage holding a rosary — something he has done in the past while making controversial comments. He likened Kirk to Moses, saying the activist “brought us to the promised land,” and argued Kirk’s killing will save “Western civilization” by “returning the people to Almighty God.”

Posobiec concluded his message by shouting at the crowd, urging them to engage in “spiritual warfare” on Kirk’s behalf and “put on the full armor of God.”

Posobiec was echoed by Pete Hegseth, the U.S. secretary of war who belongs to a denomination co-founded by Pastor Doug Wilson, a self-described Christian nationalist. Hegseth described Kirk as “a citizen who had the biblical heart of a soldier of the faith, who put on, every single day, the full armor of God with a smile as the Scriptures tell all Christ followers to do.”

Hegseth then said that, in the wake of Kirk’s death, “it’s our turn,” and urged the crowd to “live worthy of Charlie Kirk’s sacrifice, and put Christ at the center of your life, as he advocated for giving his.”

Other speakers included conservative commentator Tucker Carlson, an Episcopalian, who said Kirk was “ultimately a Christian evangelist”; Secretary of State Marco Rubio, a Catholic, who argued Kirk would want attendees at the service to be inspired to embrace Christianity and who then recited a lengthy, paraphrased version of the Apostles’ Creed; and White House deputy chief of staff for policy Stephen Miller, a Jewish man who railed against Trump’s ideological opponents, using a series of conflict metaphors, before declaring “God is on our side.”

Arguably the least religious speech of the day was delivered by Trump, a self-described nondenominational Christian. After walking out to pyrotechnics — a common feature at TPUSA events — while recording artist Lee Greenwood sang “God Bless the U.S.A.,” Trump described Kirk not as a Christian martyr but a martyr for “American freedom.”

Amid the ensuing 45-minute speech, during which Trump appeared to repeatedly deviate from his prepared remarks to discuss topics unrelated to Kirk or his death, the president joked that he struggles with the kind of Christian principles Kirk would want him to embrace, such loving one’s enemies.

“I hate my opponent and I don’t want the best for them,” Trump said. He then turned to Erika Kirk, saying, “I’m sorry, Erika.”

Trump said he agreed with Kirk that the U.S. needed a “spiritual reawakening.” Like many of the speakers, the president envisioned a specific kind of religious revival sparked by Kirk’s killing. Trump — whose administration has been criticized and sued by a broad spectrum of religious groups — appeared to tie a surge of faith to support for his administration’s core policy objectives, namely, its widespread crackdown on immigration and deployment of federal agents and troops into U.S. cities in response to disputed claims of surging crime.

“We have to bring back religion to America because without borders, law and order, and religion, you really don’t have a country anymore,” Trump said, sparking applause. “We want religion brought back to America. We want to bring God back into our beautiful USA like never before.”


Opinion

At Charlie Kirk's memorial, Christian artists play a role as GOP's political messengers

(RNS) — Political activists have recruited Christian musicians to sell policy, and Christian musicians have used their concerts to condemn abortion and support sexual abstinence campaigns.


Women listen during a worship song before the start of a memorial for conservative activist Charlie Kirk, Sept. 21, 2025, at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Ariz. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)


Leah Payne
September 22, 2025

(RNS) — On Sunday (Sept. 21), as conservative activist Charlie Kirk was eulogized in Glendale, Arizona, by luminaries of the American right, Christian music superstars Chris Tomlin, Brandon Lake, Phil Wickham, Kari Jobe Carnes and Cody Carnes led the mourners in singing contemporary worship songs as well as old standbys. In the days since his Sept. 10 assassination, other prominent Christian musicians such as Michael W. Smith and Matthew West have memorialized Kirk as a “true patriot” doing “the work of the Lord,” a martyr inspiring future generations of Christians to “carry the banner of Christ.”

This outpouring will not surprise anyone familiar with the business of contemporary Christian music — known familiarly as CCM — the predominantly white evangelical Christian devotional pop music that has often gone hand in hand with conservative activism.

Since its birth in the late 1970s, CCM has encouraged conservative political activism, and it has thrived on marketing a religiously inspired American patriotism. (Black gospel music, on the other hand, has not followed these patterns.) It took a while for CCM to find its political niche: In the early days of the industry, CCM artists participated in a broad array of political and social activism, from ending nuclear armament to Farm Aid, and raised money for AIDS patients.

As CCM grew as a business, however, the most successful political and social efforts were those aligned with the GOP platform.

Through the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s, top-selling Christian music reliably repeated top priorities of the Republican National Committee. Christian music promoted the pro-life movement, abstinence-only education in public schools and — especially after 9/11 — enthusiastically articulated American exceptionalism. Christian artists often framed their support for these causes apocalyptically; Jesus was coming soon, the logic went, and therefore, the time for mincing words about abortion or sex ed was over. Direct pleas for Christian causes were what was needed at the end of time.

Savvy evangelical political activists came to see in CCM a critical “soft power” that could be used to shape American foreign and domestic policy, and Christian musicians were recruited to use their concerts to collect purity pledges in support of True Love Waits abstinence-only sex education, as well as donations to support charities like World Vision and Compassion International.

In the early aughts, Mark D. Rodgers, staff director for the Senate Republican Conference and former chief of staff to then-Sen. Rick Santorum, recognized that CCM stars offered a powerful gateway into a vast network of evangelical activists and media producers. A longtime Capitol Hill insider, Rodgers drew upon the evangelical strategist James Davison Hunter’s argument that Christians should be a “faithful presence” in “elite levels of sectors that shape worldview.”

In an interview for “God Gave Rock & Roll to You: A History of Contemporary Christian Music,” Rodgers explained how CCM artists fit into activist efforts. “Who are the elites of our day?” he reasoned. “If we are talking about strategically engaging sectors that shape worldview, it felt to me like art and entertainment was a sector that should be a priority.”

Beginning in 2001, Rodgers pursued connections with both mainstream entertainers and CCM artists, attending the GMA Dove Awards (the Christian music scene’s Grammys), conversing with leading figures and hosting political briefings. For Rodgers, this strategy was grounded in a conviction: “Politics is downstream of culture,” he said. “Christian artists play a role with their craft in shaping world view, moral imagination, what we love, and what we hate.”

When U2’s Bono began lobbying American politicians for African debt relief, Rodgers instead mobilized evangelicals through their own cultural icons, arguing that “the strategic way to reach evangelicals is to recruit evangelicals,” specifically by mobilizing Christian music artists. Rodgers was among those who encouraged Bono to promote his nonprofit DATA (Debt, AIDS, Trade, Africa) by meeting with a cross-section of CCM stars in December 2002.

When CCM stars spoke about DATA at their concerts and lobbied Congress to forgive African debt, officials assumed they spoke for their festival audiences. Their advocacy helped generate bipartisan support for President George W. Bush’s PEPFAR initiative in 2003, which launched billions of dollars in U.S. aid to Africa.

Republican partnerships with Christian artists have continued in the intervening years, and the Trump administration has actively courted well-known CCM artists along with Christian artists who write and perform music used in evangelical liturgy, known as “worship music,” such as Tomlin and the Carneses. By inviting them to the White House, and now including them at Kirk’s memorial service, conservative activists are capitalizing on the very effective power of Christian music to be the soundtrack of the religious right.

The soft power of Christian musicians like the Carneses has arguably grown over the years because, in many ways, Christian musicians in the 2020s have an even more direct access to their fans than they did in the aughts. They no longer need fans to come to concerts: Through social media platforms like Instagram and TikTok, their access to the faithful has grown exponentially, increasing their value to conservative political organizations.

For their part, Christian musicians like megastar Forrest Frank seem determined not to view their support for Kirk or their place in the conservative media-verse as “political.” Instead, Frank frames Kirk’s death through the lens of the end times. The day after the assassination, Frank shared a video of himself weeping as he watched Kirk praise his music and declared “Jesus is Lord.”

The following day, Frank reported a loss of 30,000 Instagram followers. Unfazed by the exodus, he reflected on Kirk’s death through his own anticipation of the Second Coming. The loss of followers, Frank reckoned, was nothing compared with saving souls at the end of time, and Frank, along with many other Christian artists, recognized Kirk as a fellow witness. “Today is the day,” the singer told his remaining 6 million followers. “The hour is at hand.” On Wednesday, Frank debuted a new song about the ordeal: “JESUS IS COMING BACK SOON.”

(Leah Payne is author of “God Gave Rock and Roll to You: a History of Contemporary Christian Music” and director of Candler School of Theology’s Summer Institute for Global Charismatic-Pentecostal Studies. The views expressed in this commentary do not necessarily reflect those of Religion News Service.)















Kirk Assassination Puts the U.S. Left in Danger

Tuesday 16 September 2025, by Dan La Botz


The assassination of Charlie Kirk, the 31-year-old leader of the far-right youth organization Turning Point USA has intensified the political polarization in the United States and has led to calls by Trump’s Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement to call for the elimination of the left from American political life.


Kirk was assassinated by a single rifle shot while speaking at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. Within two days, Tyler Robinson, a 22-year-old student, turned himself in to the police and was charged with the murder.

Following Kirk’s killing, President Donald Trump in a national address stated, “For years, those on the radical left have compared wonderful Americans like Charlie to Nazis and the world’s worst mass murderers and criminals. This kind of rhetoric is directly responsible for the terrorism that we’re seeing in our country today, and it must stop right now.” Laura Loomer, who influences Trump, wrote, “We must shut these lunatic leftists down. Once and for all. The Left is a national security threat.”

Kirk was a devoted follower and friend of President Donald Trump who saw his organization Turning Point USA as the youth group of the MAGA movement. In 2024, the group mobilized young people to vote for Trump, helping him to win the presidential election.

Kirk was a white Christian nationalist who routinely suggested that Black people, especially Black women, were intellectually inferior. He argued that Jews were responsible for the Great Replacement of white Americans by people of color. He said that women should reject feminism and submit to their husbands. He believed that LGBT people violated God’s Biblical law. While claiming to be an advocate of free speech, Kirk’s Turning Point USA maintained a “professor watchlist” aimed at driving progressive professors out of academia. He stated that Muslims would kill every Jew on earth. He said that Palestine did not exist and asserted that claims of starvation of children in Gaza were fake news. He dismissed climate change, falsely claiming there was no scientific consensus on its cause.

Tyler Robinson, grew up in a Christian, Republican family in Utah. He was an excellent student, like video games, and had become interested in politics, but was apparently not a member of any organization. He reportedly confessed to the murder, but if he is the murderer, we don’t know why he killed Kirk.

But we have some clues. Some unfired cartridges found near the rifle used in the shooting had been engraved: One read, “Hey fascist! Catch.” Another read, “Bella ciao,” a lyric from a song of the Italian anti-fascist resistance of World War II. So, perhaps Robinson had become an anti-fascist who wanted to kill the leading youth organizer of an American fascist movement. If so, we think he made a terrible mistake.

We socialists have always rejected individual acts of terror, such as assassinations. First, large organizations or social movements are not likely to change direction or to be stopped by the killing of one person. On the contrary, the murder of a charismatic and popular leader like Kirk could create a martyr around whom people will organize.

Second, assassination leads to repression such as we are witnessing now, as rightwing agitators, politicians, and the government take advantage of the murder to call for a purge of leftists in America.

We on the left, as well as progressives and liberals, are in danger. Even before Kirk’s killing, Trump was sending troops to American cities. Several right-wingers on social media now call for a civil war. Leaders of armed, violent groups like the Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys have called upon their members to mobilize. We will have to be vigilant and to organize to defend our organizations and our rights, while continuing to oppose Trump, the Republicans, and the far-right.

14 September 2025

Attached documentskirk-assassination-puts-the-left-in-danger_a9176.pdf (PDF - 905.2 KiB)
Extraction PDF [->article9176]


Dan La Botz was a founding member of Teamsters for a Democratic Union (TDU). He is the author of Rank-and-File Rebellion: Teamsters for a Democratic Union (1991). He is also a co-editor of New Politics and editor of Mexican Labor News and Analysis.

International Viewpoint is published under the responsibility of the Bureau of the Fourth International. Signed articles do not necessarily reflect editorial policy. Articles can be reprinted with acknowledgement, and a live link if possible.





Articles of Faith

Changing how your faith is portrayed by media takes a movement

(RNS) — Our democracy will be stronger when we ensure positive depictions of minority communities especially.

WE HAVE VISION TV ON BASIC CABLE IN CANADA

(Image by Pikurā/Pixabay/Creative Commons)


Simran Jeet Singh
September 18, 2025


(RNS) — For years, scholars have been identifying the negative stereotypes about various faith groups that are commonly perpetuated through our media. A 2021 report on how film and TV portray Muslim communities found that while Muslims make up nearly a quarter of the world’s population, they only represent about 1% of the characters in popular TV shows. And in those relatively few cases, Muslims were typically portrayed as foreign and violent.

But a new study from the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding on the effects of these stereotypes revealed a surprising connection between media portrayals of Muslims and our politics. First, a no-brainer: Those who viewed positive portrayals of Muslims in the media are more likely to oppose anti-Muslim policies, according to the ISPU’s study. But it also found that showing Muslims in a positive light made viewers more likely to oppose anti-democratic policies in general.

RELATED: To understand a faith, first understand the people who practice it

In other words, our democracy is and will be stronger when we ensure positive depictions of minority communities.

This idea feels intuitive to me, perhaps because of my own experiences of belonging to the Sikh community, which itself has been overlooked and misrepresented by media. I’ve long argued that the best way to combat dehumanization is to humanize people, and that storytelling is a powerful tool for building that empathy.

Understanding the stakes is important. But given the overwhelming dominance of stereotyped Muslims on our screens, the question remains: How do we take on such a gargantuan task?

This question came up repeatedly throughout a recent retreat I attended with my cohort from the Faith and Media Initiative at Oxford University. The fellows and guests discussed a variety of topics, from artificial intelligence and influencer economies to propaganda and religious persecution, but kept coming back to media.

What I came away with is this: The media landscape is variegated, complex and multifaceted, and our solutions must be equally so. There is no single solution, and the work demands a broad movement, not a silver bullet. To borrow a metaphor from my friend Jonathan, we can imagine our intervention as a flotilla, one that not only invites collaboration but actually demands it.

Over the past few years, I have seen a number of incredible thinkers and leaders investing their time and treasures to this area of faith and media. I have done so too, with the understanding that media shapes our culture, that this was a way to make the world a better place.

I’ve also realized that this is not a solo exercise, that no single individual, no matter how smart or powerful, can do this work on their own. All the social movements in human history have been just that, social movements, meaning that they relied on human collaboration.

RELATED: A 500-year-old Sikh tradition returns to Capitol Hill to resist bigotry in politics

This doesn’t mean that everyone agrees on everything, even on the end goal of the effort. What it does mean, though, is that we recognize people’s dissatisfaction with the status quo and harness it to inspire positive change, which makes our world stronger and our societies healthier.

I realized this again this weekend in Oxford, as a I sat alongside brilliant leaders with tons to offer. There’s so much each of them brought to the table, and our power increased exponentially when we began to connect and collaborate. Imagine what might happen when we expand beyond that small group and turn this initiative into a movement.