Showing posts sorted by date for query American Exceptionalism. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query American Exceptionalism. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Sunday, March 01, 2026

 

Climate Crisis Threatens Everything


It was the summer of 2003. I was employed at the time as the national coordinator of the Independent Progressive Politics Network, working towards, we hoped, a progressive, broad-based alternative to the Dems and Reps. But something happened that summer in Europe which changed my life, leading me to leave that IPPN job a year and a half later in the hope that I could find paying work focused on the climate crisis. What happened that summer to lead to that personal change?

Here is how AI Overview reports it:

The 2003 European heatwave was an extreme, prolonged, and deadly weather event, with estimated fatalities exceeding 30,000 to 70,000, particularly in France, Italy, and Spain. Lasting from June through mid-August 2003, it featured temperatures 3 to 5°C above average, often exceeding 40°C in Western Europe, causing severe agricultural losses and sparking major wildfires…

I had known at the time about “global warming,” knew it was one of many important issues. But the research I did that fall, the books I read, convinced me that this crisis was much more serious, more imminent, than I had thought that it was. If tens of thousands of people in economically developed Europe could die from an extreme weather event caused in large part by the heating up of the atmosphere, and with knowledgeable people predicting this was just one example of what humankind worldwide would be facing for years to come, even if we did stop burning oil, coal and gas, the fossil fuels whose ubiquitous use is the primary reason for these events, this was clearly a very real, here-and-now existential threat for all forms of life on all of the earth.

I remember talking with a good friend at the time who was questioning me about this decision to alter my main focus. I answered that I was doing so primarily because of the seriousness of the crisis but also because I doubted the immediate potential, back then, for a coming together of independent progressives significant enough to have an impact. The conscious Left was weak and divided, not in a position, I felt then, to have much impact nationally for years to come.

I’ve thought about and studied this question a number of times over the past 23 years. During that time I have taken part, on local, state and national levels, in campaigns and initiatives other than just the climate crisis, but that has continued all that time as my top priority. The biggest example is my throwing myself into the Bernie Sanders Presidential campaign when it happened in 2015 and 2016. The fact that he made the climate crisis one of the main issues he spoke about, one of a number of them, definitely resonated with me.

Also resonating since then has been the articulation and advancement of the idea of a Green New Deal by AOC and others after that Sanders campaign, an initiative which combines action on the climate crisis/ecological devastation with the kind of systemic, pro-justice, housing/healthcare/childcare/jobs/etc. governmental actions needed on many other pressing issues facing the USA and the world.

When Trump was elected in 2024, I and groups I’m a leader of consciously took part in anti-fascist actions in support of immigrant rights, against ICE, and for other no-to-fascism efforts like the No Kings demonstrations throughout 2025.

As 2026 gets underway, with Spring thankfully on the horizon, there are a number of ways that those of us who get it on the seriousness of the climate crisis can take action. One way is to support Democrats and serious progressive Independents running for elected office who speak about this issue while connecting it to others. A second way is raising this issue up at nationally distributed actions on March 28 No Kings, April 22 Earth Day and May 1 Mayday Strong. A third way is strengthening and broadening out the “Make Climate Polluters Pay” movement working in 1/3 or more of the states to pinpoint the fossil fuel industry and get them to pay for the damage they are causing.

The climate crisis, the worldwide emergency we are in, truly calls out for us in the belly of the beast to keep raising this up, to take on those who don’t give a damn about the ecocide their policies are advancing. This is an issue on the agenda of history and the world right now.

In this critical election year when the Trump fascists are deeply unpopular, but wind and solar continue to have the support of three-fourths of the US population, let’s act accordingly as we go about our anti-fascist organizing.

Ted Glick has been a progressive activist and organizer since 1968. He is the author of the recently published books, Burglar for Peace and 21st Century Revolution, both available at https://pmpress.org. Read other articles by Ted, or visit Ted's website.

The Age of Human Arrogance


Why Conservation Is Not Charity but Survival


For most of human history, we lived as one species among many. We shared forests with elephants, rivers with hippos, skies with vultures, and coastlines with turtles whose migrations predate our earliest civilizations. The natural world was not a backdrop to human life; it was the condition that made human life possible. For millennia, animals and ecosystems existed in a balance shaped by climate, instinct, and time — not by human ambition. Today that balance is collapsing, not because nature changed, but because we did.

Deforestation, industrial expansion, mining, poaching, and the global appetite for profit have pushed countless species to the edge of extinction. Forests that once stood for centuries now fall in days. Rivers that sustained entire communities now carry toxins. Animals that evolved over millions of years now disappear faster than we can name them. And yet, in the midst of this destruction, a dangerous idea persists: that humans are the chosen species, entitled to dominate the earth and everything on it. This belief — ancient in origin, modern in its consequences — has become one of the most destructive ideologies of our time.

The Myth of Human Superiority

Human beings often speak as though we are the center of creation. We behave as though the earth was designed for our consumption, our comfort, our expansion. But the truth is simpler and far less flattering: we are not the architects of this planet. We are not the authors of biodiversity. We are not the custodians we pretend to be. We are one species among millions — and the only one destroying the conditions that sustain us. Elephants do not clear forests for profit. Wolves do not poison rivers. Whales do not warm the oceans. Insects do not destabilize the climate. Only humans do this, and we do it while insisting that we are the “intelligent” ones.

Animals Have Coexisted Longer Than Our Civilizations Have Existed

Before the first empire rose, elephants were already shaping savannahs. Before the first city was built, whales were already navigating oceans. And before the first human carved a tool, birds were already migrating across continents and weaving nests with a mastery that required no teacher. Their craftsmanship predates our own, reminding us that the natural world was building, creating, and sustaining life long before humans claimed to be the planet’s designers.

Nature does not need us. We need nature. Yet the modern world behaves as though conservation is an act of charity — something we do for animals out of kindness. In reality, conservation is an act of self‑preservation. When a species disappears, an ecosystem weakens. When ecosystems weaken, human survival becomes uncertain. We are not saving animals. We are saving the conditions that allow us to live.

Empire’s Greed Is the Real Predator

The greatest threat to wildlife is not hunger, drought, or disease. It is the global economic system built on extraction. Forests fall because corporations want timber and land. Elephants die because ivory is profitable. Sharks vanish because their fins are currency. Rainforests burn because soy and cattle feed distant markets. This is not nature’s violence. This is empire’s violence — the violence of profit without responsibility. And it raises a question we rarely ask: what kind of species destroys the world it depends on?

The Disease of Human Exceptionalism

The belief that humans are “God chosen ones” or “superior” has become a moral disease. It allows us to justify destruction as destiny. It allows us to treat other species as resources rather than lives. It allows us to imagine that intelligence is measured by domination rather than coexistence. But intelligence without restraint is not wisdom. Power without responsibility is not leadership. Dominion without care is not stewardship. If anything, our behavior reveals not superiority but insecurity — a species unsure of its place, compensating with control.

The Question We Must Finally Ask

If humans are truly the “God chosen ones”-species, then chosen for what — to dominate or to protect, to consume or to coexist? The answer will determine not only the fate of animals but the fate of our own species.

A Different Imagination Is Possible

Conservation is not about returning to the past. It is about choosing a future — a future where forests are valued for more than their timber, where animals are recognized as co‑inhabitants rather than commodities, where human progress is measured not by what we extract but by what we preserve. This requires humility — the recognition that we are not the center of the world but part of it. It requires restraint — the willingness to limit our appetites. And it requires responsibility — the courage to confront the systems that profit from destruction.

Because the truth is simple: when we destroy the natural world, we destroy ourselves. And no belief in human exceptionalism will save us from the consequences of our own arrogance.

Sammy Attoh is a Human Rights Coordinator, poet, and public writer. A member of The Riverside Church in New York City and The New York State Chaplains Group, he advocates for spiritual renewal and systemic justice. Originally from Ghana, his work draws on ancestral wisdom to explore the sacred ties between people, planet, and posterity, grounding his public voice in a deep commitment to human dignity and global solidarity. Read other articles by Sammy.

MAGA is the Avatar of a Fossil Fuel Industry Coup

Source: Originally published by Z. Feel free to share widely.

I wrote over a year ago that “doomerism,” or “doomism,” if you prefer, ought to be a precondition for activism. If you believe that the sea won’t soon rise and drown the coastal cities that run the world’s economies, if you believe that deserts won’t swell and swallow up farmlands, if you believe that fascist predatory schemes don’t threaten to spill over into genocide and nuclear war then you have most likely consumed the opiate of happy endings. You capitulate to the cult of false hope, and go about your life in the habitual assumption that good fortune will intervene, as it always has. Trump will die as Hitler did, and after a brief ritual of reckoning, a few therapeutic hangings perhaps, we can all return to the daydreams of a brighter future, or, minimally, the consolation that life goes on. Politics shapes itself to fit the contours of our national stories, our tales, our self-deception, our faith in a mystically blessed USA – the beneficiary of an eternal sequence of eleventh hours.

Maybe we have crossed a threshold into a set of contingencies that no longer adheres, even remotely, to the plotline of our accustomed narrative. Perhaps we have entered a new moral dimension where human regrets no longer have access to the brakes of corporate bureaucracy. What happens to our communities, towns, cities, nations and farmlands if the sixth extinction leapfrogs from being a hypothetical construct to an encroaching reality, with drowned coastal cities, epic wildfires, unimaginable hurricanes and blizzards, desertified croplands and empty shelves at the grocery store? I believe that many of us expect that nature will offer humanity some last minute gift of clarity, as if an anthropomorphic environment itself will create a “Goldilocks Zone” for activism in which pain, anger and resolve all attain “critical mass.” But the US has always been a land of lies, myths, false history and, above all else, manufactured optimism.

We, who call ourselves progressive, grudgingly have begun to admit that we live within a consolidating fascist nightmare, but our collective mindset has been washed and rewashed in the toxic bromides of national destiny. The US survived two centuries of slavery, decades of Jim Crow, the fascist aspirations of Father Coughlin, Joe McCarthy and Richard Nixon, and for every assault we have formulated a counterattack. We have John Brown, MLK, Muhammed Ali, even Bernie Sanders, and so many warriors of free speech and opposition – Ralph Nader, Dick Gregory, Woody Guthrie and let’s toss in Jesse Welles to keep ourselves current. We are drunk on the nostalgic elixir of The New Deal and Keynesian economics. We, the putative beacon of global Democracy have absorbed the mythology of temporary setbacks.

Unfortunately, we no longer deal exclusively with the bumps and bruises of an eternally rapacious US right wing that has never abandoned its Confederate roots. The right that currently flourishes in the US does not merely bathe in wistful memories of slavery and Jim Crow – it has fully merged with capitalism, circling the wagons to fend off the threat of climate activism via a government takeover, conceived, funded and carried out with oil industry “dark money” and Heritage Foundation planning. The Republican juggernaut has unified around a platform of war and oil colonialism (hiding behind a smokescreen of immigrant scapegoating). The fossil fuel empire no longer limits itself to the rhetoric of denial, but expansively wages an all-out war against nature with the spoils of its successful coup – a $1.5 trillion dollars of imperial military force. Consider the following quote:

“A US foundation associated with the oil company Shell has donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to religious right and conservative organizations, many of which deny that climate change is a crisis, tax records reveal.

Fourteen of those groups are on the advisory board of Project 2025, a conservative blueprint proposing radical changes to the federal government, including severely limiting the Environment Protection Agency.

Shell USA Company Foundation sent $544,010 between 2013 and 2022 to organizations that broadly share an agenda of building conservative power, including advocating against LGBTQ+ rights, restricting access to abortions, creating school lesson plans that downplay climate change and drafting a suite of policies aimed at overhauling the federal government.”

The rightwing elites, busily consolidating their particular type of all-American fascism, have seldom been recognized in mainstream media stories as being an extension of the fossil fuel industry. Some pundits may lament that “drill, baby drill,” became the rallying cry of the last Trump campaign, but how often does the press rigorously follow the cash binding Trump to Exxon-Mobil and Chevron?

The clues are everywhere in plain sight. Recall that Trump offered to rescind most environmental regulations in exchange for a billion dollars in fossil fuel campaign donations. This represents a quid pro quo so transparently unethical that, in any other time period, could have only been finalized in absolute secrecy. The marriage of politicians and oil has been performed with bells and whistles, but the relationship still manages to fly under the radar. In the 2024 election Kamala “I Love Fracking Too” Harris made no mention of Trump’s campaign dependence on fossil fuel money.

The two nations being the most obvious targets of US imperial design are Venezuela and Iran (rumored to be under imminent threat of US bombing attacks as I write) – two of the most prolific oil producing nations in the world. The proposed annexation of Canada would bring another oil rich land into the fold of US domination. We might also view Trump’s attempts at a rapprochement with Putin’s Russia as an effort to gain access to Russian oil extraction. The absurdity of our times pivots around a fossil fuel industry contrivance –Kakistocratic Fascism – racing toward consolidation neck and neck with global extinction. We can’t fight the power if we don’t grasp the plot.

This is catastrophic news for planet earth – we have already entered an era of environmental danger unprecedented in human history and quite likely never encountered in geological history either. The greatest environmental apocalypse in the evolution of planet earth took place some 252 million years ago at the Permian/Triassic boundary. Geologists believe that a “large Igneous Province” (LIP) is the smoking gun for the Permian/Triassic extinction event. Some two million years of hyper-volcanism subjected the flourishing biosphere to both a prolonged buildup of atmospheric CO2 from volcanic “outgassing” and from concomitant carbon emissions as coal fields ignited by flowing lava burned for thousands of years. The Permian “Great Dying,” that eliminated some 90% of species, came perilously close to sterilizing the entire planet. Ocean temperatures reached levels resembling those of a hot tub. Acidification, bleached coral reefs and deep ocean anoxic environments – foul smelling, sulfuric and lifeless – characterized the preeminent biological catastrophe in the half billion years of multicellular evolution.

The Permian offers us an imperfect window into our own fossil fuel narrative. The noted paleontologist, Gerta Keller, has called fossil fuel burning, and the natural-historical trend of volcanically driven mass extinction, “exactly the same.” Researchers believe that the Permian extinction – although involving hundreds of thousands of years of volcanic activity – can largely be traced to relatively short periods (lasting a few thousand years) of volcanic pulses. These brief events released highly concentrated amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere. CO2 ppm spiked to over five times the levels that preceded the Siberian Traps volcanism. At its most intense, scientists, using proxy sedimentary samples, have estimated that the Siberian Traps and the proximate flaming coal deposits released 4.5 gigatons of CO2 into the atmosphere every year (1 gigaton equals a billion tons). How, you might ask does that compare with Exxon-Mobil/Chevron’s etc. cumulative yearly emissions? In 2024 atmospheric carbon increased by 38 gigatons – roughly 8 times faster than at the apex of the Permian. If current trends continue, we should expect CO2 emissions to reach 75 gigatons annually by 2050 – or 18 times the velocity of atmospheric carbon during the worst volcanic pulses of the end Permian extinction. Allow that to sink in. The mass exterminating event of our times does not involve the callous indifference of continental plates poking holes in the lithosphere – the lethal chain of events involves a century of oil industry control of government policies on a global scale, culminating in a fascist coup carried out by proxies of the fossil fuel industry – notably, Donald Trump.

Experts warn us that preindustrial CO2 atmospheric concentrations may increase by a factor of three in the next 75 years. This is not compatible with human civilization. One should also understand that CO2 is not the only greenhouse gas. As the earth heats, deadly amounts of Methane are released from melting permafrost and warming oceans. Nitrous Oxide is added to the atmosphere from human agricultural practices, and a number of industrial pollutants cause additional warming. Water vapor is also a greenhouse gas, and as the atmosphere warms, water vapor increases in a feedback loop.

It has been like pulling teeth to get media figures to realize that Trump is a fascist, but that realization only comprises half of the story – Trump is merely an avatar for oil profits. The oil industry drives US fascism with limitless cash and a stream of industrially created right wing narrative fictions from well endowed think tanks. We may vaguely understand that climate deterioration causes immigration to increase, while those too poor to immigrate suffer and die, but we must also be aware that the oil industry funds the politicians, media and think tanks that shape toxic immigration narratives. The evil irony takes your breath away. Those in the Global South, who lose their lives and livelihoods to oil industry greed, also double as scapegoats.

The oil industry has written stories that point fingers at their victims in the past – I am forced again to tell the story of tetraethyl leaded gasoline – the weapon employed to commit the worst crime in history. Leaded gasoline caused a hundred million premature deaths, and the lead poisoned brains of inner-city children has, according to many researchers, been the most likely reason for the several decades of increased violent crime in US cities during the 1960’s to the late 1990’s. The banning of tetraethyl (beginning incrementally in 1970) brought the crime rates down. The dominant US political narrative employed by Nixon, Reagan and Clinton, blamed spiking crime rates on super-predators (a euphemism for Black youth) who were fed into the burgeoning “prison industrial complex.”

History may not repeat itself, but “history just rhymes” we have been warned. Once again the oil industry and its political proxies have composed a narrative to blame their own horrific crimes on innocent scapegoats. Immigrants are being brought by the tens of thousands into brutal caged settings while the perpetrators of a looming planetary holocaust evade all consequences. We struggle to tell the story accurately – the legendary Climate activist, Roger Hallam pleads for us to use requisite language:

“There are certain words polite society forbids.

Genocide.
Collapse.
Treason.

Say them, and you are hysterical. Extreme. Nuts.

But there comes a point in the life of a civilisation when refusing to use the correct word becomes the real extremism.

We are living through the greatest act of intergenerational violence in human history. The evidence is no longer scattered across obscure journals. It is in mainstream newspapers. Intelligence briefings. Government admissions.

The question is no longer whether the crisis is real. The question is whether we are prepared to describe what is happening with moral clarity.”

In line with Hallam’s exhortation to embrace “moral clarity,” we must understand the narrative predicament that we now suffer. A fascist coup, with no other specific description is terrible enough, but a fascist coup paid for and overseen by the fossil fuel industry aspires to do more than merely kill people and scarf up profits. The US environmental program ought to be seen as The Siberian Traps Large Igneous Province on steroids. The barest possibility of survival depends on regime change and the nationalization of the oil industry. Trump and his senile antics are a mere distraction while the oil industry raises its dagger.

Fossil fuels are the mother of capitalism – AI and tech industries consume vast quantities of oil – they are fossil fuel adjuncts. The US Military is the largest institutional consumer of fossil fuels on earth, but we must understand, as political writer, Grace Blakeley, observes, that the military is inexorably bound to fossil fuels in the manner of a composite entity. The military does not merely consume fossil fuels and pollute the dying planet, it fights wars to procure these fuels. Think of the oil/military industrial complex as the mother of death, the author of US fascism and the executioner of planet earth – then act accordingly.

Phil Wilson writes at Nobody’s Voice.Email

Phil Wilson is a retired mental health worker and union member. His writing has been published in ZNetwork.org, Current Affairs, Counterpunch, Resilience, Mother Pelican, Common Dreams, The Hampshire Gazette, The Common Ground Review, The Future Fire and other publications. Phil's writings are posted regularly at Nobody's Voice (https://philmeow.substack.com/).

Saturday, February 28, 2026

Of Monks and Oligarchs






One of the things I have learned in my more than seven decades of life is that everything has its opposite. For instance, you wouldn’t know up if there was not also a down. You wouldn’t know warmth without cold. Darkness reveals the light. For every peak there is a corresponding valley. In the same way, good and evil reveal one another.

Not long ago, a group of Buddhist monks and a dog named Aloka completed a peace walk of more than two thousand miles from Texas to Washington, DC, in the dead of winter. Their long walk was a continuation of a trek that began in India.

Coming from India, the monks were not acclimated to North American winters. They were not ideally clothed for the journey, and they carried very little with them. Deep cold and snow had set in over most of the route. Without complaint, they endured pain and suffering. Illness befell some of them that required medical intervention. But the monks were focused on two things: mindfulness and peace. Nothing could dissuade them from completing the task they had set for themselves.

I had heard about the event, but I did not immediately give it the attention it deserved. I occasionally checked on the monk’s progress. But as the weeks passed, I began to pay closer attention to the crowds of people that had gathered to bear witness, often in severe weather.

People from all walks of life, young and old alike, came out to witness the spectacle, to offer words of encouragement, and to provide clothing, food and drink, lip balm, flowers and medicine and moral support to the monks. Some kind soul even supplied boots for Aloka. It seemed that with each town the monks passed, the crowds grew, and there was an obvious spiritual bond between them. The monks brought out the best in people.

On the final stages of the peace walk, I witnessed events that are not commonplace on this continent. The monks were humble, respectful and reverent. Their demeanor, their grace, their dignity, so rare these days in the midst of hatred, war, drug abuse, alcoholism, hubris and violence was not something I have witnessed here before on that scale. It felt surreal.

An aura of spirituality enveloped the participants. The mutual respect and reverence, the spiritual connection between the peace walkers and their supporters was palpable. You could feel the sanctity, the reverence for life and the love that radiated outward from the monks and was reciprocated in kind by the observers.

You could feel the authenticity in every gesture of compassion and empathy that passed between the monks and the onlookers. As they approached the nation’s capital, the monks and their supporters were melding into a single, integrated entity for peace, a literal peace movement.

I saw an elderly ex-marine break down in tears in the presence of the monks. I saw young children with flowers in hand and a wondrous glow of innocence in their eyes, give each passing monk a flower, a gesture of compassion and love, and I also saw the monks give flowers to the children and elderly men and women who braved the elements to share the mystical experience unfolding before them. No money changed hands but many profited. A wealth of experience accumulated like snowflakes in a winter storm.

The event and all who participated in it showed that another world is possible. It demonstrated that human beings could choose to walk humbly in a sacred manner, rather than take up arms against their brothers and sisters on other continents. We can consciously choose a path of enlightenment and spirituality over the coerced march to death and destruction that our so-called leaders are foisting upon us. The choice is ours to make.

The monks and Aloka didn’t tell us anything. Rather, they showed us the path to enlightenment through their long walk and their willingness to endure suffering. Every footstep was a prayer for peace and justice writ large in the language of motion, the act of being and doing. To walk in a sacred manner is not a symbolic gesture. It demonstrated that harmony is possible, but it requires intentionality, mindfulness, compassion and empathy for all life.

When existential stress is removed from our lives, calmness and peace of mind fills the vacuum, and peace can come to full flower. Ruthless competition yields to mutual aid and cooperation, shared prosperity, and the recognition that all is one. We have but one earth and we need to share it with every living thing. The very presence of the monks evoked peace; it awakened the slumbering hope that once animated our lives and gave us purpose. It reminded us that we can and must do better.

In contrast to the Buddhist monks, a few weeks prior, I heard Scott Bessent, the Secretary of Treasury, his pride-swollen chest puffed out, gleefully boasting about deliberately imposing suffering and misery and death on the Iranian people, including women and children, through sanctions and tariffs, frozen assets and blockades of critical resources. But this is nothing new. Our bread crumb trail of sins lead us far into the past and to inescapable conclusions about who we are and what we truly believe as individuals and as a nation.

We are not at peace with ourselves or the world. We are a people divided by socioeconomic class. We measure worth by income and social status and by material possessions and dominance. The almighty dollar owns us. We think that we can buy happiness and rule the world. Our imaginary visions of grandeur are in reality a dystopian nightmare that devours hope and human decency and leaves a trail of corpses in its wake.

Bessent’s economic statecraft is being imposed on Iran, Cuba and Venezuela and other nations, especially in the global south, that pose no threat to us. As a matter of policy, people are starving to death and being denied access to medicine and a decent life. These are the wretched of the earth, and they are our brothers and sisters. They are us. That is not statecraft. It is sadism, a crime against humanity.

Iran poses no material threat whatsoever to the US, and neither does Cuba or Venezuela, but the US seeks to humiliate them and destroy their sovereignty. It plans to turn Cuba and Gaza into another fantasy island for the Epstein class.

In a similar vein, Marco Rubio, the US Secretary of State, recently gave a sickening speech at the Munich Security Conference, in which he proposed rededication to US imperialism, by using its economic and military might to steal the resources of other nations and to enslave their populations to corporate interests and to sow chaos and misery and other forms of debauchery.

To Rubio, that is how strong people treat the weak and powerless; they dominate them and plunder their sovereign nations without regard for their people’s needs. That is the mentality of a plantation owner and a Christian fascist.

Rubio’s intentions are clear: to impose US global dominance, to reassert its powers and to turn back the hands of time to the good ole days of slavery, child labor, colonial occupation, and the subjugation of non-whites. In a shameful display of sycophancy, the European capitalists gave Rubio a standing ovation.

As if turning a knife in the back of the resistance, Rubio also skewered “godless communists” for getting in the way of US imperialism around the planet. But if communism is godless, as Rubio asserts, it would therefore infer that capitalism is a religion of godliness, and it would also accord Rubio himself the status of one of its high priests. Although I am not a Christian or a member of any organized religion, I am quite certain that the prosperity gospel does not appear anywhere in the King James version of the Holy Bible.

What Rubio and his minions propose reeks of Manifest Destiny and American exceptionalism. It is a violent and oppressive ideology that fosters the assumed superiority of global oligarchs over working people. It treats the rest of the world as subjects to be ruled and punished by the rich and powerful, as if being poor were a sin punishable by death.

By now it should be abundantly clear to anyone with a conscience and an ethical code of conduct that the Buddhist monks peace walk was spiritually enlightened and life-affirming, whereas Marco Rubio’s speech on behalf of empire was death-affirming and dark. We Homo sapiens are enigmatic creatures. We often have difficulty connecting the dots and seeing the clear picture resolving before our eyes. Good and evil make a well-defined contrast to one another, as does the enlightenment and darkness of the human soul.

The effect those monks had on the people they met on their peace walk will stay with me for the rest of my life.

On the other hand, I hope that I can soon forget the vitriolic garbage spewed forth by the likes of Scott Bessent, Hillary Clinton and Marco Rubio. The thought of them and their psychologically deformed ideology literally makes me ill. We can and must do better. We needn’t pursue another trail of tears or create more reservations and American colonies. There are too many of them already.

Charles Sullivan is a writer/philosopher who resides in the Ridge and Valley Province of Turtle Island (North America). Email: charlessullivan7@comcast.netRead other articles by Charles.


Where We Are Headed



February 27, 2026

Image: NASA Hubble Space Telescope.

According to Professor Kevin Anderson, one of the world’s most respected climate scientists, and based upon a 30-year uninterrupted trendline: “We are headed for 3°C-4°C of warming across this century, an absolute climate catastrophe for all species, including our own” unless society takes drastic action soon to challenge climate change in an all-out global unified fashion, human extinction on ‘some level’, whether partial or complete, is on the agenda; it’s for real, no turning away. Alas, the world’s current course “is the headlight” at the far end of the tunnel.

The issue of climate change leaves many people cold. They either don’t want to face it or feel it’s a problem that’ll somehow, due to American exceptionalism, or some other similar crazed mythological belief, be fixed, no worries, ignore it! Due to this type of confusion, climate change, as a concept, has serious problems. The words “climate change” turn people away like the yellowed pages of an old book’s musty odor. It’s clichéd, tired, hackneyed, worn out and one of the biggest targets of abuse in the English language. So, little wonder that the words spark confusion, distrust, or anger, or in many cases, just turn away, who needs it? Accordingly, Eight of the Top Online Shows Are Spreading Climate Misinformation, Yale Climate Connections d/d April 21, 2025, and often backed by large advertising budgets, as a new breed of climate denial gains popularity.

The level of misinformation in social media is so prevalent that it’s a wonder anybody believes climate change is a real threat to human existence. More to the point, who really wants to believe that anyway? Human extinction, on some level, balderdash! It’s preposterous! No, so sorry, the truth is: It’s not preposterous! It’s already a well-established trend.

The climate story has certain benchmarks that have already exposed a lot about where things are headed. A benchmark is “a standard point of reference.” The key benchmarks for analytical purposes: (1) actual scientifically measured climate change over time (2) actual effectiveness of mitigation of climate change. These benchmarks have been analyzed by one of the world’s most respected climate scientists and addressed for public view on YouTube: “Climate Change: Where We Are Headed” is the title of a YouTube address by Kevin Anderson. A recent update to “Where We Are Headed” is found in his January 2026 speech entitled: “A Velvet Or Violent Climate Revolution: Which Will We Chose.” rejecting naïve, techno-optimistic narratives, the talk concludes that no non-radical pathways now remain.

Kevin Anderson is Professor-Energy & Climate Change, University of Manchester and previously a Deputy Director of Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, one of the world’s most prestigious climate research institutes.

Professor Anderson starts his public YouTube address by talking about the record of climate change mitigation over the past 32 years. That’s when the first major scientific report on climate change was released, in the early 1990s. Since then, “we’ve watched emissions go up year after year after year.” Now 60% higher per year than in 1990. Based upon this 30-year trendline: “We are headed for 3°C-4°C of warming across this century, an absolute climate catastrophe for all species, including our own.”

“Climate catastrophe is the direction of travel,” but it does not have to continue if the world would get serious rather than “talk, talk, talk.” The current 30-yr trendline overrides all of that ‘hopeful chatter’ about various solutions to climate change as simply bunches of rhetoric, false optimism and greenwashing rather than implementation of strong global measures to stay within the 1.5° to 2°C framing of the Paris agreement.

Current Trend Locks In 3-6 Feet Sea Level Rise Within Decades

In a very real sense the future is totally unpredictable because there is no precedent in human history for the consequences of a temperature change of +3°C-4°C. Still, current trends will lock in high levels of sea level rise, potentially 7-8 meters (23-26 feet), or more. Along the way, on a current generational timeline: “Across this century we may see one or two meters (3-6 feet) sea level rise, which will be catastrophic for all coastal cities worldwide, most of the world’s population live near coasts.”

Climate change today is also changing how we produce food because global warming changes well-established, dependable weather patterns that dictate food growth cycles. Farmers cannot simply pick up and move operations to another climate zone because their climate zone has collapsed or altered too much to support regular crop growth, as rainfall patterns change, and insect pollination of crops changes, all due to a changing climate.

In the final analysis, we, as a species, are confronted with the collapse of modern society amid the collapse of key ecosystems. We (society) should be doing everything possible to avoid this certain outcome, but sadly “we’re doing nothing to avoid it.” There is plenty of talk but not nearly enough effective action. And the climate only responds to efficacious action.

Currently, the physics of the world responds to the amount of CO2 and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Meanwhile, there’s talk-talk-talk about efficiency, talk about green renewable growth, etc. but to a certain extent, it’s meaningless. “What really matters is keeping greenhouse emissions out of the atmosphere.”

Net Zero is Dangerous

Countries have made promises about what they intend to do, e.g., removing CO2 from the atmosphere, but there are but few pilot programs taking a stab at it, and results are decidedly anemic. “There is nothing out there of any scale. So, collectively, we ‘image solutions’ because we are too scared of the political repercussions of actually driving emissions out of the system today, full stop. There has been a deliberate misuse of the ‘prospects of technology as a savior’. There are models in the public domain that are facades of what can be accomplished to correct the situation, and we hide behind these pseudo-technologies, phony models, not to worry. When people claim we have until 2050 to make changes and they target Net Zero, blah-blah-blah, watch out! Net Zero is a real dangerous term… it is Latin for ‘kick the can down the road.”

CO2 Outlook

According to a February 2026 International Energy Agency (IEA) report: We are entering a new Age of Electricity with strong demand continuing over the foreseeable future. Last year saw record deployment of Solar PV… “Natural gas-fired output is also set to grow through 2030, supported by rising electricity demand in the United States and the continuing shift from oil to gas for power in the Middle East. Coal‑fired generation loses ground globally as renewables expand, returning to 2021 levels by the end of the decade. As a result, global CO2 emissions from electricity generation are expected to remain roughly flat between now and 2030.” Globally, over 90% of all CO2 emissions come from burning fossil fuels energy of which electricity generation is the largest contributor.

According to Statista d/d Jan. 20, 2026: Global carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels and industry totaled 38.11 billion metric tons (GtCO2) in 2025. Global CO2 emissions in 1990 were 22 billion metric tons when the first major scientific report came out. Conclusion: If CO2 emissions remain “flat between now and 2030,” we’ve still got a massive 73% increase in CO2 since the problem was officially recognized in a major scientific report. Disappointing, as well as dangerously, the question remains: Where are the fossil fuel emission cutbacks, as suggested by Professor Anderson? There are none, which puts an exclamation point on his thesis.

According to the 2026 Global Carbon Report: “Decarbonization of energy systems is progressing in many countries – but this is not enough to offset the growth in global energy demand.”

Indeed, technology can be part of the solution, if and when scale is vast enough to be meaningful, but it also needs to go hand-in-hand with social change, eco-social justice that trims the sails of current economic models that totally ignore climate risks. This is not even close to happening.

We Are Going To Fail

In Professor Anderson’s opinion, “We are going to fail… we are going to 3 to 4 degrees centigrade of warming… we’ll have to somehow struggle to live through it or possibly die from repercussions.” Society obviously needs to try everything possible to avoid this prospect. In that regard, there is a message of hope, meaning we really “have a choice” of whether to fail or not… Unfortunately, world leadership has chosen failure for the past three decades. By now, it’s becoming embedded.

Still, there are historical examples of rapid positive change when the world comes together, which is what’s needed e.g. 1) a worldwide collective agreement on Covid with a global response and 2) the global response to the 2008 banking crisis, and 3) in the 1930s Roosevelt fireside speeches with radical changes proposed in contrast with the social norms of the time. Now the world community needs to accelerate such examples laid across the impending threat of climate change. There is a choice to fail, or there is choice to succeed. Professor Anderson is hopeful “civil society” will take the lead to opt for success by rejecting failure.

Meanwhile, according to a World Bank report on 4°C above pre-industrial: “There is no certainty that adaptation to a 4°C world is possible.” According to Professor Kevin Anderson, without an all-in global effort equivalent to multiples of the historic Marshall Plan, the current trend is 4°C on a pathway towards ‘some level of extinction’, whether partial or complete; it’s a very big unknown.

Robert Hunziker lives in Los Angeles and can be reached at rlhunziker@gmail.com.