Wednesday, November 26, 2025

 

The pterosaur rapidly evolved flight abilities, in contrast to modern bird ancestors, new study suggests



Johns Hopkins Medicine
Reconstruction of a Late Triassic landscape (approximately 215 million years ago). A lagerpetid, a close relative of pterosaurs, is perched on a rock, observing pterosaurs flying overhead. 

image: 

Reconstruction of a Late Triassic landscape (approximately 215 million years ago). A lagerpetid, a close relative of pterosaurs, is perched on a rock, observing pterosaurs flying overhead.

view more 

Credit: Matheus Fernandes





In a study of fossils, a research team led by an evolutionary biologist at Johns Hopkins Medicine suggests that a group of giant reptiles alive up to 220 million years ago may have acquired the ability to fly when the animal first appeared, in contrast to prehistoric ancestors of modern birds that developed flight more gradually and with a bigger brain.

A report on the study, which used advanced imaging tools to study the brain cavities of pterosaur fossils, and was funded in part by the National Science Foundation, was published Nov. 26 in Current Biology.

The findings add to evidence that enlarged brains seen in modern birds and presumably in their prehistoric ancestors were not the driver of pterosaurs’ ability to achieve flight, says Matteo Fabbri, Ph.D., assistant professor of functional anatomy and evolution at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. 

“Our study shows that pterosaurs evolved flight early on in their existence and that they did so with a smaller brain similar to true non-flying dinosaurs,” Fabbri says.

Fabbri says the pterosaur was a force to be reckoned with in dinosaur skies, weighing up to 500 pounds and with a wingspan of up to 30 feet in some species. It is known to be the oldest of three groups of flying vertebrates (in addition to birds and bats) that independently evolved self-powered flight.

To learn whether pterosaurs acquired flight differently than birds and bats, the scientists studied the reptile’s evolutionary tree to pinpoint the evolution of pterosaur brain shape and size, looking for clues that may have led to the development of flight. They focused particularly on the area involved in vision, the optic lobe, the growth of which is thought to be associated with flying abilities.

Using CT scans and imaging software that allowed the scientists to extract information about the nervous systems of fossils, the researchers honed in on the pterosaur’s closest relative initially described by a team of researchers in 2016, the flightless, tree-dwelling lagerpetid that originated during the Triassic period 242 to 212 million years ago. In 2020, another group of scientists characterized the lagerpetid’s close relation to the pterosaur.

“The lagerpetid's brain already showed features linked to improved vision, including an enlarged optic lobe, an adaptation that may have later helped their pterosaur relatives take to the skies,” says corresponding author Mario Bronzati, a researcher at University of Tübingen, Germany.      

A larger optic lobe was also present in pterosaurs, Fabbri says. However, he says there were otherwise very few similarities in the shape and size of pterosaur brains and that of the flying reptile’s closest relative, the lagerpetid.

“The few similarities suggest that flying pterosaurs, which appeared very soon after the lagerpetid, likely acquired flight in a burst at their origin,” Fabbri says. “Essentially, pterosaur brains quickly transformed acquiring all they needed to take flight from the beginning.”

By contrast, modern birds are believed to have acquired flight in a step-by-step, more gradual process, inheriting certain features, such as an enlarged cerebrum, cerebellum and optic lobes from their prehistoric relatives, and later adapting them to enable flight, says Fabbri. This theory is supported by 2024 findings from the lab of Amy Balanoff, Ph.D., assistant professor of functional anatomy and evolution at Johns Hopkins Medicine, that point to the expansion of the brain’s cerebellum as a key to bird flight. The cerebellum, located at the back of the brain, regulates and controls muscle movement among other activities.

“Any information that can fill in the gaps of what we don’t know about dinosaur and bird brains is important in understanding flight and neurosensory evolution within pterosaur and bird lineages,” Balanoff says.

In further studies, the scientists analyzed brain cavities of fossils from crococdylians (crocodile ancestors) and early, extinct birds, and compared these with pterosaur brain cavities.

They determined that the pterosaur's brain had moderately enlarged hemispheres, similar in size to other dinosaurs—including two-legged bird-like troodontids living during the Late Jurassic to the Late Cretaceous periods 163 to 66 million years ago, and the oldest-known bird, Archaeopteryx lithographica from 150.8 million to 125.45 million years ago—compared with the brain cavities of modern birds.

In the future, Fabbri says that better understanding how the structure of the pterosaur brain, in addition to the size and shape, enabled flight will be the most important step to better infer the basic biological laws of flight. 

Funding support for this research was provided by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, Brazilian Federal Government, The Paleontological Society, Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Técnica, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, the European Union NextGeneration EU/PRTR, the National Science Foundation ( NSF DEB 1754596, NSF IOB-0517257, IOS-1050154, IOS-1456503), and the Swedish Research Council

In addition to Fabbri and Bronzati, other scientists who contributed to this research are Akinobu Watanabe from New York Institute of Technology, Roger Benson from the American Museum of Natural History, Rodrigo Müller from Federal University of Santa Maria, Brazil, Lawrence Witmer from the University of Ohio, Martín Ezcurra and  M. Belén von Baczko from Bernardino Rivadavia Museum of Natural Science, Felipe Montefeltro from São Paulo State University; Bhart-Anjan Bhullar from Yale University; Julia Desojo from Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina; Fabien Knoll from Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Spain; Max Langer from Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil; Stephan Lautenschlager from University of Birmingham; Michelle Stocker and Sterling Nesbitt from from Virginia Tech; Alan Turner from Stony Brook University; and Ingmar Werneburg from Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen.

 

Farms could be our secret climate weapon, QUT-led study finds


Queensland University of Technology
Professor Claudia Vickers 

image: 

Professor Claudia Vickers.

view more 

Credit: QUT





The world’s farms could become one of the most powerful tools in the fight against climate change according to a new international study led by QUT.

Published in Plant Physiology, the paper lays out a framework to assess how plant agriculture and synthetic biology innovations can help mitigate climate change by cutting greenhouse gas emissions and increasing carbon storage.

Lead author Professor Claudia Vickers, from the QUT School of Biology and Environmental ScienceCentre for Agriculture and the BioeconomyQUT Centre for Environment and Society, and the ARC Centre of Excellence in Synthetic Biology, said that while farming contributes substantially to global emissions, its vast footprint means even modest improvements in carbon capture or emissions reduction can deliver global-scale impact.

“Global croplands are estimated to capture more than 115 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide annually through photosynthesis,” she said.

“Even modest improvements in how crops capture, use, and store that carbon, if applied across existing farmland, could deliver huge climate benefits.”

The study introduces a quantitative framework to compare the potential of different strategies – from bioengineering crop traits to non-genetic approaches like biochar and reforestation.

Professor Vickers said the framework helps compare “apples with apples” by considering not just the carbon captured per hectare, but also scalability, durability, technical feasibility and socioeconomic fit.

The researchers found that reducing reliance on synthetic nitrogen fertilisers could have the most immediate, large-scale effects, each offering gigatonne-level potential for carbon mitigation.

In the longer term, synthetic biology approaches could collectively contribute up to 260 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent drawdown over the next century.

The analysis shows that while the amount of carbon captured per hectare varies greatly across strategies, the ultimate impact depends most on the scale of deployment, and according to the authors, no single intervention will be sufficient.

Instead, a portfolio of strategies is needed, combining mature solutions that can be deployed immediately with innovations still in development.

Professor Vickers said that successful interventions must be technically feasible, economically viable, durable, and scalable, while ensuring minimal harm to ecosystems.

“Improving agricultural carbon sequestration also helps deliver to food, feed and fibre priorities, along with farmer income and security. This makes these solutions triple bottom line solutions – addressing social, environmental, and economic outcomes,” she said.

“Agriculture is uniquely positioned to both feed the world and fight climate change.

“But we need to focus on the interventions that can deliver meaningful, measurable outcomes. Our work provides a roadmap to do just that.”

Read the full paper, Harnessing Plant Agriculture to Mitigate Climate Change: A Framework to Evaluate Synthetic Biology (and other) Interventions, published in Plant Physiology, online.

 

National survey finds virtual health ‘essential’ for Long COVID support: SFU report



Preliminary results of a national survey conducted by researchers at the Simon Fraser University Faculty of Health Sciences (SFU FHS) has found that Canadians with Long COVID identified virtual healthcare services as essential to their care.




Simon Fraser University

Long COVID 

image: 

Researchers at the SFU Faculty of Health Sciences surveyed Canadian Long COVID patients, and found that many people with the condition consider virtual care "lifesaving and essential," while also noting that their primary care provider had little-to-no awareness of Long COVID. 

view more 

Credit: Photo: DC Studio






“Many of the 621 survey respondents from across the country shared how lifesaving and essential these virtual services are in providing accessibility to care that reduces risk of infections, travel time, and PEM”, shared FHS Research Fellow Kayli Jamieson, who also has Long COVID herself. 

PEM, or Post-Exertional Malaise, is common in many people with Long COVID, meaning that physical, mental, or sensory activity triggers can cause a flare-up in symptoms lasting from hours to weeks. It is one of many factors that contributes to the chronic and frequently disabling nature of Long COVID.

The study, led by FHS Assistant Professor Dr. Julia Smith, aims to analyze experiences with virtual care through an intersectional lens and ultimately produce a national guidebook providing recommendations on improving virtual care access for people with Long COVID.

A research brief detailing the findings to date from the national survey was issued this fall. In addition to the identification of the importance of virtual care, 69 per cent of respondents shared that their primary care provider had low-to-no awareness of Long COVID, identifying another immediate and significant barrier to accessing health care

“These preliminary results suggest that virtual care is particularly helpful for people with Long COVID who face barriers accessing health services such as rural, racialized and 2SLGBTQIA+ patients,” explains Smith. “We are conducting further research to better understand how virtual healthcare can better serve these groups.”

Additional recommendations include increasing availability of specialized Long COVID services in Canada—a suggestion that will require training more specialists and care providers on Long COVID management for informed, effective, and safe care.

The next phases of the study will include conducting focus groups with equity-deserving populations who have Long COVID and hosting a deliberative dialogue session among patients, clinicians, and policymakers to better identify systemic solutions to address this growing gap in health care.