Monday, December 29, 2025

Trump is unpopular in Europe — even among right-wing populist supporters, POLITICO Poll shows




The US president gets favorable views from only about a third of people who support the parties Trump wants to see win power in France and Germany.


December 29, 2025 
By Hanne Cokelaere
POLITICO EU


U.S. President Donald Trump wants to grow Europe’s right-wing populist movement but he might have a harder time than he expects winning over European voters.

The MAGA leader is unpopular in Europe, even among the supporters of right-wing populist parties he sees as allies, according to the new POLITICO Poll in partnership with Public First, which surveyed more than 10,000 people across five countries earlier this month. His biggest fans are in Britain, where 50 percent of Reform-aligned respondents had favorable views of Trump. However, in France and Germany, only about a third of people who said they had supported right-wing parties reported seeing Trump in a favorable light.

The poll findings come after the Trump administration rolled out a new national security strategy aimed at cultivating the “growing influence of patriotic European parties,” which have drawn increasing support in France, Germany and the U.K., though they haven’t yet translated that into electoral wins.

The new POLITICO Poll data offers a potential warning to right-wing populist parties trying to attract broader support while also getting closer to Trump, as people who said they would support such parties in a new vote were more negative about Trump than those who supported them in the past across the U.K., France and Germany.

Divisive figure

Supporters of far-right populist parties tend to think more highly of U.S. President Donald Trump than others, but even they are divided. And support dwindles further among potential new voters, according to the results of The POLITICO Poll.

Percentage of respondents who said they have a positive or a negative opinion of Trump.


The U.S. president is even more unpopular across the general population. In France and Germany, two-thirds of respondents held a negative opinion of him. In the U.K., 55 percent reported negative views; barely more than in the U.S., where 50 percent said they had negative views. Trump is least popular in Canada, where 72 percent of respondents held a negative opinion.

Supporters of the “patriotic” right-wing populist parties the U.S. administration name-checked in its security strategy are far more supportive of the U.S. president than others but, crucially, not even they delivered a ringing endorsement.

In France, voters of the National Rally of French right-wing populist firebrand Marine Le Pen were broadly appreciative of her. But when it came to the U.S. president, more voters said they held a negative view (38 percent) than reported a positive one (30 percent). Alternative for Germany supporters overwhelmingly approved of party leader Alice Weidel, but were also divided over Trump, with 34 percent thinking well of him and 33 percent opposed.

The findings underscore the challenge facing the National Rally, which isn’t just catering to its past voter base but also trying to win broader backing ahead of local elections next year and a key presidential election in 2027. The party of right-wing populist firebrands Le Pen and Jordan Bardella is the third political force but the largest single party in the National Assembly, and is currently polling well ahead of other parties.

Its leaders were quick to dismiss White House efforts to support Europe’s right-wing forces. Bardella told The Telegraph that he rejected the “vassalage” of “a big brother like Trump,” and Thierry Mariani, a member of the party’s national board, told POLITICO that “Trump treats us like a colony — with his rhetoric, which isn’t a big deal, but especially economically and politically.”

The exception was Britain, where 79 percent of Reform supporters reported holding favorable views of their leader Nigel Farage as Trump found a bare majority of favorable views.

America First, friends second?


Across the U.K., France and Germany, right-wing populist supporters stood out because of their strong demand that political leaders put their own country first.

Fifty percent of National Rally voters, 47 percent of AfD voters, and 45 percent of Reform UK voters singled it out as one of the most important attributes in political leaders.


Right-wing populist respondents overwhelmingly agreed that this is a quality Trump possesses over French President Emmanuel Macron (88 percent), German Chancellor Friedrich Merz (93 percent) and U.K. PM Keir Starmer (91 percent). And a clear majority said they want their leaders to try and get along with Trump.

Local right-wing populist movements have a “nationalist instinct” in common, according to Jules Walkden, research manager at Public First — but that might ultimately put them on a collision course with Trump’s MAGA movement favoring U.S. interests.

“Supporters of Europe’s right-wing parties clearly want to see their leaders put their own country first, and they may see Trump as a champion of this approach,” Walkden said. “But once elected, the practical demands of delivering on a ‘country first’ promise may quickly expose the limits of this alignment.”

'Putting the country first'

Supporters of far-right populist parties tend to prize political leaders who "put the country first" and have more positive views about U.S. Donald Trump.

Share of respondents who voted for National Rally, Reform UK or AfD in the most recent election and who listed "putting the country first" as a key characteristic in political leaders, compared with the share that said they have a positive view of Trump.

 National

The POLITICO Poll data also suggests that right-wing populist supporters may admire Trump’s policies, but they don’t trust him.

Right-wing populist voters in France and Germany were likelier than others to think that Trump’s policies benefit the U.S. but also likelier to say that they harm other countries while doing so.

Again, Reform UK supporters were most open to Trump, with 42.8 percent saying everyone would benefit from Trump’s policies.

Across Germany, France and the U.K., right-wing populist supporters were far likelier to agree that when a country’s interests clash with allies, the country should come first. They were also more likely to say that domestic industry should be protected, if need be to the detriment of its global competitiveness. Nearly 67 percent of Reform UK voters, 71 percent of National Rally voters, and 72 percent of AfD voters indicated this in the POLITICO Poll.

In spite of that, supporters of those parties tended to be more accepting of the tariffs the Trump administration has put on European industries.

Sixty-five percent of AfD voters said the tariffs were bad for Germany but just 37 percent thought Germany should slap tariffs on the U.S. in return — well below the overall 47 percent of German respondents who favored this. In Britain, just 45 percent of Reform UK voters considered the tariffs a bad thing and just 35 percent said that the country should match U.S. tariffs with its own tariffs on U.S. imports.

Wary of Trump

Winners and losers of U.S. President Donald Trump's policies, as assessed by respondents to The POLITICO Poll.

Comparing results by country with the answers of respondents who said they voted for a right-wing populist party in the most recent election, the percentage of respondents who say Trump’s policies:

Table with 6 columns and 6 rows.
Benefit the U.S.Harm the U.S.
…but harm other countries…and benefit other countries…and harm other countries…and benefit other countries
FranceTotal37.4%13.1%21.0%9.3%
National Rally42.1%23.8%10.4%7.6%
GermanyTotal30.2%10.6%39.3%8.2%
AfD39.2%28.6%14.4%6.8%
U.K.Total33.3%20.4%27.4%5.2%
Reform UK30.6%42.8%9.4%3.6%


But in a sign that right-wing populist supporters’ appreciation of Trump would only go so far, 60 percent of National Rally voters said Trump’s tariffs on imports from Europe were a bad thing for France’s economy. And while they were less likely than others in France to say that their government should match those tariffs, 48 percent still favored retaliation.

This edition of The POLITICO Poll was conducted from Dec. 5 to Dec. 9, surveying 10,510 adults online, with at least 2,000 respondents each from the U.S., Canada, U.K., France and Germany. Results for each country were weighted to be representative on dimensions including age, gender and geography, and have an overall margin of sampling error of ±2 percentage points for each country. Smaller subgroups have higher margins of error.

The survey is an ongoing project from POLITICO and Public First, an independent polling company headquartered in London, to measure public opinion across a broad range of policy areas. You can find new surveys and analysis each month at politico.com/poll. Have questions or comments? Ideas for future surveys? Email us at poll@politico.com.
Much Talk, Little Outcome: Peace Efforts Yield No Breakthrough on Ukraine

December 29, 2025
NOVITIATE



US President Donald Trump said that Russian President Vladimir Putin has not accepted the idea of a ceasefire during a possible Ukrainian referendum on a proposed peace plan. Trump made the comments at a joint press conference with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky following their meeting, after Trump had spoken by phone with Putin in advance.

Asked directly whether Putin had agreed to halt the fighting during a referendum, Trump replied that there was no such agreement. He explained that Putin’s position was based on concerns that stopping hostilities and then potentially resuming them could put Russia at a disadvantage. Trump said he understood that logic but added that discussions were ongoing on how to address the issue.

Trump also claimed that, if the war ends, Russia would take part in Ukraine’s reconstruction. He said Moscow supposedly wants to see Ukraine succeed, although he acknowledged that this might sound contradictory. At the same time, Trump complained that unnamed “bad people” had spread false narratives that, in his view, had obstructed efforts by Washington and Moscow to reach agreements.

Earlier, on 23 December, Zelensky said Ukraine was preparing a 20 point peace plan that could either be approved by parliament or put to a nationwide referendum. He noted that such a referendum would require at least 60 days and would only be possible under a full ceasefire during that period. On 28 December, Zelensky and Trump met in Florida and later held a video conference with European leaders. Trump said ahead of that meeting that he had a “good and very productive” conversation with Putin. Putin’s aide, Yuri Ushakov, later stated that both leaders had agreed a temporary ceasefire under the pretext of a referendum would only prolong the conflict.

European leaders responded positively to the Florida talks and the subsequent video call. According to statements cited by Interfax Ukraine, they stressed the importance of joint efforts to secure a just and lasting peace and to keep pressure on Russia. The video conference followed closed door talks between Ukrainian and US delegations at Trump’s Mar a Lago residence.

Finnish President Alexander Stubb confirmed that the call included French President Emmanuel Macron, Polish President Karol Nawrocki, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. Stubb said the discussion lasted more than an hour and focused on concrete steps to end the war.

Polish President Nawrocki underlined strong US engagement in the peace process and highlighted Poland’s role, noting that Rzeszów Jasionka airport has handled more than 90 percent of aid deliveries to Ukraine since the start of Russia’s full scale invasion. He said Poland’s position would be crucial in any peace agreement and stressed that regional security decisions must involve all stakeholders. According to his statement, US determination combined with European unity offered a real chance to end the war.

Von der Leyen also described the talks as productive and said significant progress had been made. Irish Prime Minister Micheál Martin welcomed what he called progress in the peace discussions and said he hoped it would soon lead to a ceasefire. Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof said positive signals from Washington must now be matched by concrete steps from Moscow, adding that the Netherlands would continue supporting Ukraine.

European foreign ministers echoed these messages. Dutch Foreign Minister Wopke van der Linde spoke about next steps in the talks and stressed the need to further increase pressure on Russia. Czech Foreign Minister Jan Lipavský described the outcome of the Zelensky Trump meeting as optimistic, saying Ukraine wants peace and that Russia must be pushed towards it through sanctions and a strong Ukrainian defence.

In a separate statement, von der Leyen said a one hour call with Trump, Zelensky and several European leaders had produced “good progress”. She added that Europe was ready to continue working with Ukraine and the United States to build on these results, stressing that strong security guarantees from the very beginning were essential.

Trump and Zelensky also outlined how work on the peace plan would continue. Trump said the US working group would include Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, Jared Kushner, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and others. Zelensky said the Ukrainian team would involve National Security and Defence Council Secretary Rustem Umierov, First Deputy Foreign Minister Serhii Kyslytsia and General Staff Chief Andrii Hnatov. Zelensky said he hoped decisions on six key documents could be reached in January. Trump added that these groups would also engage with Russia, saying talks limited to one side would not solve the conflict.

When asked about timelines, Trump said a deal could take a few weeks if progress was smooth, but warned that talks could also collapse over unresolved issues. Zelensky said the teams would meet again in the coming weeks and that Trump had agreed to host further talks in Washington in January.

Trump also addressed the possibility of visiting Ukraine. He said there were no immediate plans but he would be willing to go if it helped secure peace. While he did not see such a visit as necessary at this stage, he said he would consider it if it could help save lives. Zelensky confirmed that Ukraine had invited Trump to address parliament.

The talks did not resolve the issue of Donbas. Trump said progress was being made but acknowledged it remained a major obstacle. He said Russia continued to demand the entire region and that this would need to be worked out, adding he believed the issue could be resolved in the coming months. Zelensky described Donbas as a very difficult matter, stressing Ukraine’s legal position and respect for the territory it controls. He said a referendum was one possible mechanism, alongside a parliamentary vote, depending on legal requirements.

Zelensky later said that Ukraine and the United States had finalised several documents within the broader peace package. He said the 20 point plan was about 90 percent agreed, US Ukraine security guarantees were fully agreed, US Europe Ukraine guarantees were close to completion, and the military dimension was settled. He added that work was continuing on a prosperity plan and on sequencing the next steps. Both leaders agreed that security guarantees were central to achieving lasting peace and confirmed that negotiations would continue.


Thorny questions remain despite positive meeting reports from Trump and Zelensky

Issued on: 29/12/2025 -FRANCE24


US President Donald Turmp and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky both reported progress on two of the most contentious issues regarding a peace deal in Ukraine: security guarantees for the country and the division of the eastern Donbas region, which Russia is trying to capture. But thorny questions remain. David Smith, Washington Bureau Chief for The Guardian, told us more.



'It's insane': Expert makes stunning claim about Trump's chat with Zelenskyy

Robert Davis
December 28, 2025 
RAW STORY



U.S. President Donald Trump speaks next to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy upon his arrival for meetings at Trump's Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, U.S., December 28, 2025. REUTERS/Jonathan Erns

A military expert revealed on Sunday that President Donald Trump is taking an "insane" approach to ending the war in Ukraine.

Trump held another round of peace talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at Mar-a-Lago on Sunday, where the two leaders discussed the current 20-point peace plan that is on the table. Ahead of Trump's chat with Zelenskyy, the president said he had a phone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin following a night of heavy bombing by Russian forces against Ukrainian civilians.

Tom Nichols, a staff writer for The Atlantic, said in an interview on MS NOW's "Alex Witt Reports" that Trump appears to be trying to play the intermediary between Putin and Zelenskyy, a strategy that he said shows either that Trump doesn't understand the conflict or that he is lying about his efforts to end it.


"From the point of diplomatic practice, it's insane," Nicols said. You don't check in with the aggressor when you're talking to a putative friend and ally, and you don't report in afterwards. You talk with your friends, with your allies, with Ukraine, and then you tell the Russians, 'Here's the offer. Here's what you need to do.'"

"And instead, it's almost like Trump is acting like an intermediary, trying to express Putin's wishes to Zelenskyy and to the world, which is what he did after the Alaska summit," Nichols continued. "It's what he does every time he gets off the phone with Putin. The fact is, Vladimir Putin has this hold over Donald Trump that makes Trump and the American government into basically a de facto ally of Russia."



'Almost burst out laughing': MS NOW hosts crack up at Zelenskyy's reaction to Trump boast

Tom Boggioni
December 29, 2025
 RAW STORY


Volodymyr Oleksandrovych Zelenskyy (MS NOW screenshot)

Donald Trump’s boast that Russian strongman Vladimir Putin is very invested in seeing Ukraine “succeed” got a big laugh as the host of MS NOW’s “Morning Joe” noted that Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelenskyy appeared as amused at the time as they were on Monday morning.

Trump’s comment was roundly roasted on social media on Sunday and hosts Jonathan Lemire and Katty Kay joined in on the fun.

“Let’s just take that comment there from President Trump,” Lemire began before smirking and stating, “No, I don’t think Russian President Vladimir Putin is invested in Ukraine’s success — he’s the one who invaded in the first place.

Laughing as he continued, he remarked, “He’s the one still with aims to conquer it and, I don’t know if we have the footage or not, but there is, as Trump was saying, there was a cutaway shot of Zelenskyy’s reaction, and he almost burst out laughing. He just couldn’t believe what he was hearing.”

After Kay suggested Zelenskyy doing his best to play the part of a diplomat, the bemused commentator added, “I don’t know what he means when he says that Russia is very keen for Ukraine to succeed, unless Russia is keen for Ukraine to succeed under Russia’s control, which is the way that Vladimir Putin would like it to be.”



Top diplomats of China, Cambodia and Thailand meet as Beijing seeks to strengthen role in dispute

TRUMP WAS NOWHERE AROUND

By AP
Dec 29, 2025




In this photo released by Agence Kampuchea Press (AKP), Cambodia's Foreign Minister Prak Sokhonn, left, Thai counterpart Sihasak Phuangketkeow, right, and Chinese counterpart Wang Yi pose in Yunnan province, China, Dec. 29. AP-Yonhap

HONG KONG (AP) — Foreign ministers from Cambodia and Thailand convened with their Chinese counterpart on Monday as the Beijing government, building on its expanding presence in the world diplomatic arena, sought to play a stronger mediating role in the violent border dispute between the two Southeast Asian countries.

The trilateral meeting, held in a southwestern Chinese province north of the contested border, came two days after Thailand and Cambodia signed a fresh ceasefire agreement to end weeks of fighting that killed more than 100 people and forced hundreds of thousands to be evacuated on both sides of the border.

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi called for joint efforts to promote regional peace, stability and development, which is language typical for China in such situations.


“Allowing the flames of war to be reignited is absolutely not what the people of the two countries want, and not what China, as your friend, wants to see. Therefore, we should resolutely look ahead and move forward,” Wang said during the meeting Monday in Yunnan province.

It was noteworthy that the meeting was held there, nearer to the dispute and to Southeast Asia, rather than in Beijing, the Chinese capital and seat of government about 1,300 miles (2,500 kilometers) northeast.

Cambodian Foreign Minister Prak Sokhonn said he believed the latest ceasefire would last and would create an environment for both countries to work on their relations and resume the previously agreed-upon ways to settle their differences, according to a Chinese interpreter.

Thai Foreign Minister Sihasak Phuangketkeow also expressed hopes for peace with neighboring countries, the interpreter said.

The Thai Foreign Ministry later said in a statement that China volunteered to be a platform to support peace between the two countries and Thailand reiterated that adjustments of ties should be conducted “on a step-by-step basis.”


“The Thai side will consider the release of 18 soldiers after the 72 hours ceasefire observation period and requests that Cambodia facilitate the return of Thais along the border,” the ministry said.



This handout photo taken and released by Agence Kampuchea Press (AKP) shows China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi, center, speaking as Cambodia's Deputy Prime Minister Prak Sokhonn, left, who is also the country's Foreign Minister, and Thailand's Foreign Minister Sihasak Phuangketkeow listen during a meeting in China's Yunnan province, Dec. 29. AFP-Yonhap

A day after the fresh pact was signed, Sihasak and Prak Sokhonn held separate meetings with Wang on Sunday, the first day of the two-day gathering.

The meetings represented China's latest efforts to strengthen its role as an international mediator and, in particular, its influence in Asian regional crises. As China grows and becomes more of an economic and political force regionally and globally, Beijing has spent the past decade and more working in various ways to increase its voice as a third party in diplomatic matters.

The two Southeast Asian countries originally reached a ceasefire in July. It was brokered by Malaysia and pushed through under pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump, who threatened to withhold trade privileges unless Thailand and Cambodia agreed. The preliminary pact was followed by a more detailed October agreement .

But Thailand and Cambodia carried on a bitter propaganda war, with minor, cross-border violence continuing. The tensions erupted into heavy fighting in early December.

The Saturday agreement calls for Thailand, after the ceasefire has held for 72 hours, to repatriate 18 Cambodian soldiers who have been held prisoner since the earlier fighting in July. Their release has been a major demand of the Cambodian side.

The agreement also calls on both sides to adhere to international agreements against deploying land mines , a major concern of Thailand.

Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet on Monday issued a statement to all Cambodian combatants along the border with Thailand.

“Even though we can still fight," he said, “as a small country we still have nothing to gain from prolonging the fighting for a long time.”


China urges Thailand, Cambodia to continue talks, rebuild ties, mutual trust amid ceasefire

Top Chinese diplomat Wang Yi hosts his Cambodian, Thai counterparts in Yunnan province in southwestern China

Anadolu staff |29.12.2025 

Cambodian Defence Minister Tea Seiha (left) and Thai Defence Minister Natthaphon Narkphanit (right) at the General Border Committee Meeting in Chanthaburi Province, Thailand, on December 27, 2025.

ANKARA

China on Monday urged Thailand and Cambodia to sustain dialogue, restore mutual trust, and rebuild their ties amid the ceasefire agreement following recent border tensions.

The statement came after China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi hosted his Cambodian and Thai counterparts, Prak Sokhonn, and Sihasak Phuangketkeow, alongside military representatives from all three countries in Yuxi city of Yunnan province in southwestern China.

During the trilateral meeting, Wang Yi highlighted China’s active mediation since the outbreak of the border conflict, citing multiple phone calls, four special envoy visits, and ongoing diplomatic and military consultations.

“With the joint efforts of all parties, the Cambodian and Thai militaries recently reached a ceasefire agreement, which China finds gratifying,” he said.

He added that both sides demonstrated a positive and open attitude, showed commitment to easing and de-escalating tensions, and expressed willingness to improve bilateral relations on the basis of the ceasefire.

"We must look forward and move forward together," Wang said.

The Chinese minister emphasized the need for continued communication, gradual restoration of bilateral relations, and rebuilding of mutual trust.

He noted that the conflict had caused a loss of confidence, but stressed that Cambodia and Thailand, as eternal neighbors, should work to heal wounds and remove barriers to reconciliation.

China pledged support in ceasefire monitoring, humanitarian aid, and demining cooperation.

Both Cambodian and Thai top diplomats also expressed gratitude for China’s role, underscoring the importance of peace and their commitment to implementing the ceasefire.

Cambodia and Thailand signed a ceasefire agreement on Saturday, ending nearly 20 days of clashes that killed dozens and displaced nearly 1 million civilians along their disputed border.

Under the arrangement, both sides agreed to halt all armed hostilities and avoid unprovoked fire, troop advances, or movements toward each other’s positions.

The ceasefire applies along the entire border and covers military targets, civilians, and infrastructure, with Thailand set to return 18 Cambodian soldiers after the truce is fully maintained for 72 hours, ending at noon on Tuesday.

Around 99 people were killed in clashes that resumed on Dec. 8, a day after a border skirmish wounded two Thai soldiers.