Monday, March 23, 2026

FRIENDLY FIRE

VIDEO: US F-15 fighter jet shot down over Kuwait

VIDEO: US F-15 fighter jet shot down over Kuwait
/ Timothy Newman on Unsplash
By bnm Gulf bureau March 23, 2026

A US F-15 fighter jet appeared to be shot down over Kuwait on March 23, though neither US nor Kuwaiti authorities have confirmed the nature of the incident.

The reported downing follows a similar incident on March 20, when a US Air Force F-35A stealth fighter jet was struck by suspected Iranian fire during a combat mission over central Iran on March 19, US Central Command confirmed.

That incident marks a significant escalation in direct confrontation between US and Iranian forces, raising questions about the safety of American air operations in the region amid intensifying tensions.A separate friendly fire incident occurred on March 1, when three F-15E Strike Eagles were shot down over Kuwait, US Central Command confirmed in a press release.


The frequency of these incidents over a three-week period has raised concerns about operational security and coordination challenges facing US air forces operating in the Gulf region.

While both the US and Kuwait are yet to provide details on the origins of the strike or parties responsible, a video is circulating on social media showing the incident. The pilot's status remains unconfirmed.

US Central Command rejected rumours on social media earlier that day of an Iranian missile strike downing an American aircraft.

 

Gulf war drives up demand for Asian EV

By bnm Gulf bureau March 22, 2026

Chinese electric vehicle maker BYD has launched a large-scale supercharging station supported by on-site solar panels and a battery energy storage system (BESS), as the company deepens its push into integrated clean energy infrastructure.

The facility combines high-capacity charging technology with renewable power generation and storage, allowing the station to operate with reduced reliance on the grid.

In parallel with the rapid development of solar panel technology, China is also a global leader in the battery revolution that smooths out the unreliable generating cycle of renewables. The inclusion of a BESS enables the station to store excess solar energy generated during peak sunlight hours and deploy it when demand is high.

Demand for EV surging 

Asian electric vehicle makers are seeing a surge in demand as higher oil prices linked to the Iran conflict push consumers to reconsider petrol-powered cars, Bloomberg reported on March 21.

At a BYD dealership in Manila’s financial district, sales activity has accelerated sharply in recent weeks. “Clients are replacing units in favor of EVs because of the oil price hikes,” said Matthew Dominique Poh, a salesman at the outlet, adding that he had seen a month’s worth of orders in just two weeks.

Similar trends are emerging across the region. In Hanoi, Nguyen Hoang Tu Anh said VinFast showrooms had expanded staffing after customer visits quadrupled, resulting in the sale of 250 electric vehicles in the three weeks since the war began. That equates to more than 80 units a week, roughly double the company’s average sales pace in 2025.

Consumers are increasingly motivated by cost considerations. “Switching to EV will help us significantly save money,” said Lai The Manh Linh, a 41-year-old telecom employee who replaced a petrol-powered Toyota Vios with a VinFast electric model for his daily 60–70 kilometre commute.

The shift reflects broader pressure from fuel markets. The Pacific region has been particularly exposed, with about 80% of crude shipments through the Strait of Hormuz typically destined for Asian markets before the route was disrupted.

“Higher oil prices always help the transition to electric vehicles,” said Albert Park, chief economist of the Asian Development Bank. “It creates economic incentives to accelerate the green transition.”

However, sustaining the momentum will depend on structural improvements. “Affordability and charging have always been the two biggest factors hindering EV adoption,” said Joanna Chen, analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, noting that upfront costs remain higher than for conventional cars in most markets outside China.

Even before the latest oil shock, EV adoption had been rising across Asia. In China, electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles account for more than half of total car sales, supported by government policy. Southeast Asia has also seen rapid uptake, with adoption rates approaching 40%, according to think tank Ember.

“We were previously less upbeat about EV demand in 2026, as the government’s lower subsidy made EV prices less attractive compared with conventional fuel-powered vehicles,” said Surapong Paisitpatnapong, spokesman for the Federation of Thai Industries’ automobile industry group. “If oil prices stay at current levels or rise further, we expect a significant increase in EV demand.”

 

The West has split – Stubb

The West has split – Stubb
Finland’s President Alexander Stubb warned of a growing “crack” between Europe and the US under Donald Trump’s policies, urging allies to “salvage what you can” as tensions over Russia, trade and security deepen. / bne IntelliNews
By Ben Aris in Berlin March 23, 2026

Finland’s President Alexander Stubb has warned that relations between the US and Europe are fracturing under Donald Trump’s policies, urging allies to “salvage what you can” of the transatlantic alliance, The Telegraph reported on March 22.

“I’m more pessimistic now, in that sense, more realistic,” Stubb said, pointing to a shift in US policy marked by tariffs, a softer stance on Russia and reduced coordination with European allies.

Stubb said Washington’s approach had moved away from its traditional partnership model.

“In the olden days the US would consult its allies. This time around, the US acted alone without informing allies,” he said. “You cannot be a hegemon without allies. If the US continues on this path, they will also then diminish their capacity to project power.”

He added that ideological changes in Washington were reshaping priorities. “MAGA is an ideology: it’s anti-globalization, it’s anti-international institutions, it’s anti-Europe, or anti-EU at least,” Stubb said. “America First is a policy. Western Hemisphere is the first: Venezuela, Cuba, Greenland. Second is the Indo-Pacific. Europe — only third.”

Stubb has already added his voice to the growing number of EU leaders calling for rapprochement with Russia as disunity in the EU grows in the face of the increased cost of supporting Ukraine, which now entirely falls to Europe, and the worsening economic. State of Europe’s leading countries. As bne IntelliNews argued, Europe can’t afford to take over the burden of supporting Ukraine, as most EU countries are either in recession or approaching a crisis.

Since taking office, Trump has introduced a new economic paradigm based on his transactional world view and he is actively dismantling the international rules-based order and trying to replace it with an overt imperialistic system with “America First,”  as outlined in the new National Security Strategy (NSS) released in December.

The increasingly frustrated Trump recently clashed with European leaders, calling on his Nato allies to send their navies to the Gulf to support US efforts to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. All of them politely refused. Trump countered by threatening to pull the US out of Nato, restart his efforts to annex Greenland or simply walk away from the Iran debacle and leave it to the countries that “actually use it” to fix the mess.

The Finnish president said the consequences were already visible. “There is a split in the Global West right now. A crack between Europe and the US. I obviously try to salvage what I can,” he said.

Stubb also warned that easing US sanctions on Russia would have direct consequences for the war in Ukraine. “It’s very damaging for Ukraine, because it basically feeds the Russian war machine,” he said, adding that reports Russia could be earning up to $150mn a day from higher oil prices “wouldn’t surprise me at all.”

He argued that Moscow’s economic position had been weakening prior to recent geopolitical shifts. “Before the Iran war started, Russia was looking at zero growth, zero reserves, 16% interest rate, high inflation. Budget deficit rose from $83bn to $130bn,” Stubb said. “But now, with the rising oil price, lifting of the sanctions, we don’t know. It will have a negative effect.”

On the battlefield, Stubb said Ukraine had improved its position over the past year. “Ukraine today is much better on the battlefield than it was a year ago. In the past three months, Ukraine has killed over 90,000 Russian soldiers,” he said, adding: “Russians aren't able to recruit soldiers at the same pace they are losing them. 80% of the deaths come through drones.”

 

US spends more on Iran war in two weeks than four years on Ukraine war

US spends more on Iran war in two weeks than four years on Ukraine war
Trump has already spent more in three weeks on the war in Iran than Biden sent to Ukraine in four years of supporting Ukraine. / bne IntelliNews
By Ben Aris in Berlin March 22, 2026

\The US has spent more on just two weeks of Operation Epic Fury than it has done in four years of supporting Ukraine in its war with Russia.

As bne IntelliNews reported in the feature, Command of the Reload, the cost of replacing the first four days' worth of munitions would be $20bn-26bn after 14 of the systems used from a total of 34 have already fallen to critically low levels. Altogether in the first two weeks of the campaign the Pentagon has burnt through an estimated $100bn and congress has just asked for another $200bn appropriation.

US President Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that the US spent $350bn on supporting Ukraine since the start of the war in 2022. However, Congress’ official bookkeeping records that a total of $188bn was allocated for Ukraine’s assistance. But at around half that money was never used. Last year, Bankova and others estimated that only $83.4-$114.15bn was actually spent, and the vast majority of that – an estimated 90% - was spent in the US on buying weapons from US arms manufacturers.

At the time, when asked how much US aid Ukraine received, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy responded: "When I hear (...) that America has given Ukraine hundreds of billions - $177bn to be precise… I tell you as the president of a country at war that we have received more than $75bn. That is, $100bn… we never got.”

Since he took over a year ago, Trump has sent no money to Ukraine. The entire brunt of supporting Ukraine’s government in its $100bn-a-year existential fight with Russia already fell on Europe’s shoulders by August last year.

Cost of war

The Trump administration has badly miscalculated how easy Iran will be to defeat. Trump has relied on presumed US’ overwhelming military power, but Iran is fighting an asymmetric war and its superior cost-to-kill ratio. It has built up a vast stock of some 2,000 surprisingly sophisticated missiles and produces around 150,000 drones, which bne IntelliNews’ military analyst Patricia Marins has likened to “cheap cruise missiles, that Tehran is using to overwhelm America’s defences.

Operation Epic Fury has been, “the most intensive opening air campaign in modern history”, according to Payne Institute of Public Policy in Colorado.

Of the munitions that the US is running short of, most are sophisticated air defense missiles of which America only produces a few hundred a year. Stocks of the key Patriot PAC-3 interceptor missiles have been nearly exhausted in just the first few weeks of fighting and cannot be replaced this year, irrespective of how much money is allocated. A meagre 39 interceptors are slated for delivery in 2027—six years after they were ordered, according to reports.

America is thought to have used more than 300 Tomahawk cruise missiles in the opening days of the war, but the Pentagon planned to buy just 57 new ones in the current fiscal year. There have been no deliveries of THAAD interceptors since 2023 and the Pentagon has not placed any new orders this year.

Part of the US motivation for supporting Ukraine in the war against Russia is that for an investment equivalent to around 5% of the US defence budget, it has massively run down Russia’s military capabilities. “This is the best money we have ever spent,” Senator Lindsey Graham said gleefully on several occasions.

Now the tables are turned. The Economist ran an analysis last week entitled “The Iran war could sap American military power for years” as analysts dig into the cost of the war in Iran. In the same way that Ukraine has depleted Russia’s military power to the point where it will take years to rebuild Russia’s military capabilities, in three weeks of fighting in the Gulf, the US is rapidly finding itself in the same position.

That bodes ill for Washington if China chooses now to invade or blockage Taiwan. The Pentagon has already almost exhausted stockpiles of some of its key weapons like tomahawk and PAC-3 interceptor missiles, but now it has started to cannibalise its resources in Asia. As bne IntelliNews reported, the US is relocating parts of a THAAD missile defence system installed in South Korea to the Middle East after its key installations in the Gulf were destroyed by Iranian missiles.

“We don’t make enough munitions to support a war in eastern Europe, a war in the Middle East and potentially a contingency in East Asia,” US Vice President JD Vance said at the Munich Security Conference in 2024.

Despite the call for $200bn in new spending, the supply chain for munitions is opaque and the backlogs for key systems like Patriot PAC-3 interceptors already run to years. Moreover, the key systems, like THAAD radar stations and every single one of the missiles, use large amounts of critical minerals and rare earth metals (REMs) that are all entirely controlled by China, a detailed study by the Foreign Policy Research Institute (FPRI) reports.

 

LONG READ: Coal is back.

LONG READ: Coal is back.
Having been the pariah fuel for years, coal is back in demand as countries scramble for an alternative fuel in the face of an expanding energy shock driven by the war in the Middle East. / bne IntelliNews
By Ben Aris in Berlin March 22, 2026

Coal is back. Having become a fuel for most of the last two decades, countries are scrambling to secure supplies of coal in the face of “ The largest supply disruption in the history,” according to the International Energy Agency (IEA).

While Europe has largely weaned itself off coal since it was the mainstay of the industrial revolution, coal continues to dominate SE Asia’s power mix, making up well over 40%-50% across the region, and remains important in the US as well.

Coal has long been more cost-competitive than gas and thanks to the legacy coal-fired power plants, it plays a parallel role with gas as utility companies and governments flit between the two fuels, depending on the vagrancies of the market price. However, since the start of Operation Epic Fury on February 28 and both a spike in the prices and evaporating supplies, countries are already switching back or at least building up their stocks in anticipation of worse to come.

The world needs to prepare for an extended energy shock, Michael Stoppard, principle of Stoppard Energy and formerly chief strategist on global gas at S&P Global, said in an op-ed in the Financial Times at the weekend.

Coal use will surge again like it did the last energy crisis in 2022, when coal use doubled. It remains the fallback marginal fuel in several systems. A lot of existing coal plants, though fewer, are still operational and unlike expanding renewables to building new nuclear power plants, these can simply be switched on again.

But the rebound in coal use this time round is likely to be less dramatic than in 2022. Nearly half of EU electricity is now renewables and the roll out of green energy in Asia, the biggest users of coal, has been dramatic. A recent report noted that when renewables first took off two decades ago it took a decade to increase generating capacity by 1GW. Last year that went down to half a day and the roll out is increasing at an exponential rate after wind and solar power became by far the cheapest sources of energy available to companies and governments. The Global South in particular, has embraced the green revolution, whereas in the Global North, while growing more slowly, renewables already represent a much larger share in their energy mix.

The rise in renewables will buffer many countries from the worst of an energy price shock. And also unlike 2022, when there was an unexpected economic growth bounce back, demand for power in Europe at least, is smaller thanks to a structural deindustrialisation caused by the very same 2022 energy crisis.

The 2026 energy shock has all the makings of a vintage crisis and could exceed that of 2022 that saw gas and power costs balloon ten-fold.

“Analyst estimates of disruption horizons are morphing from days to weeks to months. A two-month period of resumption is no longer the worst-case scenario, it is the best-case scenario,” Stoppard said. “Europe now needs to prepare for extended disruption, learning from the mistakes of the 2022 gas crisis.”

New playing field

Europe does not import much gas from the Middle East and Qatari LNG only accounts for some 12% of its gas imports, according to Eurostat. But as it was already in a gas crisis before the war in Iran broke out it is very price sensitive. Removing Qatar’s supplies from the market puts Europe into direct competition with Asia for the limited supplies of US LNG and prices were already the pre-2022 long-term average before the war in Iran started. Restarting coal-fired power stations is the obvious solution. In a coal report, the IEA predicts while demand was flat in 2025, it will now start to rise again.

“Global coal demand in 2025 is set to remain close to 2024 levels… is expected to rise by 0.5% to 8.85bn tonnes in 2026, a record high,” the IEA said. Coal has reached a “turning point” rather than a rapid decline, according to the IEA. One of the big changes is an anticipated explosion in demand for power thanks to the datacentre revolution, which was also not included in the 2015 Paris Agreement calculations. That will now be compounded by the dislocation of supply of fuel as a result of Operation Epic Fury.

Electricity demand remains central to the IEA’s outlook. “Two-thirds of global coal use today is for power generation,” and rising consumption, especially in the Global South. That will sustain coal demand despite rapid renewable expansion. Long-term, renewables are the desirable option, but coal’s appeal is the immediacy of its ability to quickly become an additional source of power in the midst of a fast-moving crisis.

Coal in Europe

In 2021, coal was already in structural retreat across Europe due to climate policy, carbon pricing under the EU’s Emissions Trading System, and the rapid expansion of renewables. Coal accounted for roughly 15–16% of EU electricity generation. Gas remained the dominant marginal fuel.

The end of Russian gas supplies in 2022 triggered an unprecedented e nergy price shock and the revival for coal. Coal-fired generation increased by between 7% to 10% y/y that year. Germany, Poland, the Netherlands all reactivated mothballed coal plants that sent coal’s share in EU electricity generation to 18–20%.

By 2023, as the gas markets stabilised, thanks to the increase in LNG imports, the use of coal fell back again and by 2025, coal’s share dropped to roughly 10–12% of electricity generation, largely replaced by the expansion in renewables.

Natural gas and nuclear have both been popular alternatives but as the climate crisis accelerates the rollout of renewables has been both dramatic and rapid.

Today in Europe just under half of all electricity is generated from renewables and while enormous progress has been made in the last few years, green energy has not matured to the point where it can take over.

Europe has been a leader in adopting renewables and leaders like Norway now produce 83% of their power from wind and solar. However, until grid-level eight-hour batteries are rolled out that can cope with the “baseload problem” the revolution will not be complete.

Natural gas has always been seen as a stopgap solution and was supposed to be phasing out by now under the Paris Agreement projections. Now the mentality has changed, and gas is seen as a mitigator and its use is rising. The shutdown of Qatar's LNG exports has left a 20% hole in the market that the US and other producers cannot fill by themselves.

Thanks to its socialist legacy, Poland remains the most dependent on coal in Europe, which accounts for more than 50% of the power generated in 2025. Czechia is in second place, followed by Bulgaria and then Germany. Coal use amongst the remaining EU members remains relatively modest.

Gas use is widespread with Greece, Italy and the UK all depending on gas for at least a third of their power. Another eight countries rely on gas for between 10 and 20% of their power. Only the Nordic countries have reduced reliance on both coal and gas to almost nothing. Iran’s attack on the South Pars gas complex in Qatar on March 18 has now locked in a 17% in a long-term loss of production that will dramatically change the shape of the gas market.

Coal prices surge

Demand has pushed thermal coal prices up by about a fifth since the first US strikes on Iran two weeks ago, reaching roughly $146 per tonne, up 36% YTD and 60% y/y. The Asia-Pacific benchmark Newcastle futures are currently at their highest since the end of 2024.

For comparison, TTF gas prices were €60/MWh, up a massive 110% YTD, and almost double the pre-war €35/MWh average, as of March 22.

Thanks to the legacy coal infrastructure which hasn't all been decommissioned, coal and gas prices tend to move in parallel as the fuels can be swapped in times of crisis. Following Russia's invasion coal prices immediately doubled to more than $400 per tonne as utilities prepared for Russian gas supplies to be ended. After the Russian gas deliveries were cut off in 2022 the price of gas soared ten-fold to over €300/MWh.

With gas prices already rising from around €35MWh to more than €70/MTh as of March 22, that's already high enough to push utilities to switch to coal.

There is not as much coal capacity as there used to be after several large coal-fired power plants have been retired in recent years as part of the Green Deal. The UK closed its last coal plant in 2024, ending more than a century of coal-fired electricity in the birthplace of the industrial revolution.

Europe has also been actively closing coal plants, reducing the total coal-fired generation capacity by about 40%, according to reports. But those plants have only been mothballed. During the 2022 crisis Germany brought around a dozen plants out of retirement to make up for a gas shortage.

Coal in Asia

Asia remains the world’s biggest consumer of coal, consuming half of all coal burnt. But as part of its incomplete energy transformation it is heavily exposed to the war in Iran and also the world's largest consumer of gas. Asia used to buy more than 80% of Qatar's exports. Between them Japan, Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan, Pakistan and Bangladesh generate third or more of their electricity from natural gas.

Already looking into the abyss, governments across the region are now stocking up on coal, snapping up the remaining cargoes of coal on the water at record prices. Energy rationing measures are already being rolled out in Asia and the first government subsidized price caps.

What happens in China will be decisive for coal’s trajectory as it still generates half of its power using coal, says the IEA. “China consumes more coal than the rest of the world combined.”

Global trends are heavily dependent on China’s economic growth, policy direction and energy mix. Chinese demand is expected to decline slightly, but the IEA cautioned that stronger electricity demand or slower renewable integration “could turn the slight drop into a small increase”.

China is all of the world's largest coal producer, importer and consumer, despite its rapid rollout to become the global green energy champion. Coal use was supposed to peak in 2024, but it has failed to set out a coherent plan to phase out coal despite record growth in renewable energy and hitting its ambitious green energy targets. Nevertheless, China, the world’s biggest emitter of greenhouse gases (GHGs), saw its CO2 emissions go into reverse last year for the first time ever and well ahead of schedule.

Total wind and solar generation capacity has now overtaken coal, but that has also created a vast reserve of coal-fired generation capacity that protects it from the worst of the energy crisis. Today China uses less than half of its coal generation capacity and this number is dropping. If the energy crisis persists, Beijing can just restart its coal power plants – something that both China and Japan have already started to do.

Coal in SE Asia

India is even more dependent on coal than China. It generates 70-75% of its power using coal. It is also much less advanced in its transition to renewables, although that is now moving fast. Renewable energy is expected to account for 26% of India's total electricity generation by the end of this year when its wind and solar capacity will surpass that of Germany’s.

But India won’t hit the 50% of non-fossil fuel power generation for at least another five years. The IEA said in its report that “the most substantial growth in coal consumption between now and 2030 is expected to take place in India,”

In the Indo-Pacific region Indonesia is the main source of coal for most countries and remains the global export champion of thermal coal. Several Asian countries have already approached Jakarta to lay in supplies in anticipation of ballooning gas prices and the lack of supply.

SE Asia began to embrace LNG about 15 years ago. Thailand built two major import terminals and liberalized its market and so during the 2022 gas price shock the governments postponed the retirement of coal-fired units at the Mae Moh power plant, Bloomberg reports. This time around it's responding the same way and last week ordered its remaining coal-fired power plants to operate at full capacity.

Bangladesh is also heavily dependent on Qatari gas and has qualified as one of Tehran's friendly countries, granted a permits-for-passage to export oil via the Strait of Hormuz. Not to be caught with all its eggs in one basket, the authorities have also ordered the state-owned power stations to ramp up their use of coal since the start of the war in Iran.

Taiwan has long term energy supply contracts from the US but it's also preparing to restart the retired Hsinta coal-fired power plant, if supply disruptions persist, reports the Financial Times. Likewise South Korea is also preparing to boost its nuclear and coal-fired power generation

US big winner

The big winner from the fresh global gas crisis is the US which steps into the role of the premier LNG supplier for the global market. It has been rapidly expanding its gas production since the shale revolution took off in around 2008. However, LNG remains a relatively immature business. It's expanding rapidly and the US has several new projects in the pipeline that are due to come online over the next couple of years increasing the supply.

As reliance on gas has increased, the number of suppliers is dwindling making Asian countries in particular very nervous. The three big players in the LNG business were Qatar, the market leader, the US, the up-and-coming rival, and Russia, the home to vast deposits in the Arctic. Russia was taken largely out of the game by sanctions. Qatar has been removed, or at least reduced, by Operation Epic Fury. That leaves the US as the dominant player.

Asian buyers are extremely price sensitive but the geopolitical dimension of a narrowing market controlled by the US will also play a role, encouraging countries to keep some of their coal-fire capacity.

Trump is intending to capitalize on the gas chaos, which he sees as a bonanza for US companies. Trump is ramping up LNG production and has cancelled the moratorium on new LNG export terminal terminals imposed by the Biden administration on environmental grounds.

While the rest of the world has been trying to get rid of their coal-fired power plants, Trump has been doubling down on what he calls “beautiful clean coal.” The US just announced that the Terra Energy Center is pouring $1bn into a deal for a planned coal project in Alaska, Bloomberg reports – the first investment in new US coal power since 2013.

The US coal industry has been in decline as utilities turned to cheaper and cleaner sources of energy. However, in a reversal to the rest of the world Trump has pulled America out of the Paris agreement and gutted the EPA of its Obama-era "endangerment finding” – a scientific conclusion that is the legal basis for US climate regulations. Instead he is promoting fossil fuels as the central plank to his “energy dominance” policies.

Coal’s share in the US power energy mix has fallen from around half to 16% now, according to Bloomberg. Trump has been looking for quick fixes to meet the mushrooming datacentre demand for power. The rollout on renewables and nuclear is too slow to meet this demand leaving fossil fuels as the only quick fix.

With Climate Crisis-denier Lee Zeldin in charge of the EPA, Energy Secretary Chris Wright ordered six coal parts that were slated for retirement to remain in service this month. The power plants across the rural South and Ohio will get $175mn of government funding to retrofit and modernize. White House issued an executive order telling the Department of War to purchase power from the coal-fired facilities.