Human Rights Watch Calls Out ‘Troubling Conditions’ in Trump Health Aid Agreements With Africa

“After the sudden and devastating pullback from US assistance in 2025, governments are now being pressured to accept agreements with contingencies that jeopardize human rights.”


A healthcare worker fills a syringe with a dose of lenacapavir, a long-acting HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) injection, during the drug’s rollout in Nakuru, Kenya on March 26, 2026.
(Photo by James Wakibia/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

Stephen Prager
Jun 08, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

The Trump administration is requiring African nations to agree to a series of “troubling conditions” to restore lifesaving health aid, according to a Human Rights Watch report on Monday.

The administration’s abrupt shuttering of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) last year shut off billions of dollars and caused havoc across Africa’s healthcare system, resulting in what public health models project could be hundreds of thousands of preventable deaths.

But under what has been dubbed the “America First” Global Health Strategy, the administration has negotiated secretive agreements with dozens of these countries to restore some of the funding. Most of them have been kept under lock and key by the US.

Those that have been made public have come with terms that Human Rights Watch said “raise concerns that health aid is being inappropriately leveraged to extract terms beneficial to the US in negotiations around natural resources and access to sensitive health data from recipient countries.”

In March, a draft memorandum of understanding with the government of Zambia was revealed to have conditioned $1 billion for HIV, tuberculosis, malaria, and other disease prevention for millions of people, on the country’s acceptance of a separate bilateral treaty that would have given US companies greater access to the country’s minerals.

A leaked State Department memo, prepared for Secretary Marco Rubio, put the exploitative terms plainly: “We will only secure our priorities by demonstrating willingness to publicly take support away from Zambia on a massive scale.”

After the details of that agreement were met with backlash, the text of agreements with several other countries—Ethiopia, Kenya, Mozambique, Nigeria, and Uganda—were suddenly removed from the State Department’s Freedom of Information Act Library.

A Human Rights Watch assessment of the agreements with those five countries—as well as agreements with Rwanda and Liberia that were leaked—revealed that in order to restore a portion of the more than $800 million collectively stripped from them by the US, they’d have to agree to several coercive measures that jeopardize the reproductive and privacy rights of their citizens.

“The agreements show the US intends to condition vital health assistance for millions of people on acquiescence to troubling conditions,” said Julia Bleckner, senior health researcher at Human Rights Watch. “After the sudden and devastating pullback from US assistance in 2025, governments are now being pressured to accept agreements with contingencies that jeopardize human rights.”

All seven of the agreements require the governments to provide the US with “broad access to data and information” to monitor compliance with the Helms Amendment, which forbids the use of US foreign assistance to pay for abortion care.

The agreements with Mozambique, Rwanda, and Liberia require them to provide “any data” requested by the US to ensure compliance with the amendment, while Uganda’s permits the US to conduct unannounced spot checks of health facilities and clinics.

“By making a broad package of health aid contingent on broad and potentially invasive surveillance of Helms compliance, the agreement could encourage a more restrictive regulation of abortion than national law mandates and give rise to further violations of the right to healthcare,” says the report.

The agreements also give the US permission to directly audit clinics, laboratories, and health programs to ensure compliance with the conditions. Six of them require clinics to provide access to “any data” requested by the US at a sample of facilities it chooses.

Agreements with five countries also mandate that they share biological specimens taken from patients and associated information related to novel infectious diseases, which HRW described as part of an effort to undermine a global pathogen access and sharing system being created by the World Health Organization, from which Trump has removed the US.

HRW said in a news release:
The agreements raise serious concerns about use of people’s private health data, without clear limits, uniform safeguards, or meaningful protections for patient confidentiality, including in several countries with weak or absent domestic data protection laws. The agreements contain no prohibition on this data being shared with US pharmaceutical companies without patient consent.

“Governments negotiating health assistance agreements with the United States face difficult choices,” Bleckner said. “They should be wary of terms asking them to sign away their populations’ rights and push for the inclusion of civil society representatives and multilateral global health organizations like the Global Fund in deliberations.”