Air Canada, Rogers and Suncor part of consortium piloting rapid COVID-19 testing




TORONTO — Canadian space technology and robotics giant MDA will begin offering its workers rapid COVID-19 testing at its Brampton, Ont., headquarters starting Tuesday, the latest company in a consortium of some of the country's biggest firms testing workplace screening.

The pilot is being run by the University of Toronto's Creative Destruction Lab, which has partnered with 12 companies including some of Canada's top airlines, banks and sports teams to experiment with antigen tests that take about 15 minutes to deliver results.

Those behind the project believe it could give Canada's corporate world a road map to quelling the spread of COVID-19 in workplaces that have had to close or have struggled to contain outbreaks.

"It's a tool to be able to reopen parts of the economy and not have these broad range closures," Holly Johnson, MDA's director of business operations, said in an interview.

"The advantage of this kind of screening – if you can roll it out at scale and get mass screening across a wide range of workplaces and facilities – is that you can imagine wide areas of the economy being able to be opened up again."

The company's Brampton facility – which normally has a complement of about 450 employees – currently has between 85 to 100 workers on-site daily. So far, about 60 of those workers have signed up for the testing, she said.

The rapid testing at MDA is a voluntary program and is offered on top of mandatory COVID-19 protocols that are already in place, such as symptom screening, temperature testing, physical distancing and masks, Johnson said.

Workers at the space technology company register for the rapid test pilot program and sign a consent form using an app developed by Microsoft Canada Inc.

The app is also used to schedule the COVID-19 appointment and to check in when they arrive.

The test itself is a nasal swab – not the "deep brain tickler" of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, Johnson said.

After the test, employees return to the workplace and are notified of the results within about 15 minutes through the app, she said.

If the worker tests positive, the employee is asked to leave the workplace to obtain a PCR test from a provincial testing site, a deep cleaning occurs and contact tracing takes place, Johnson said.

If the PCR test is positive, the worker is required to complete the necessary quarantine and can transition to working from home.

"The employee will still get paid," Johnson said.

She added that she's hopeful more workers will sign up in the coming days.

"What we are trying to do is break the chain of transmission," said Ajay Agrawal, the founder of the Creative Destruction Lab, a non-profit helping science and tech firms.

"We are using screening to stop one infected person from infecting other people in the workplace."

Rogers Communications Inc. and Air Canada were the first two companies to begin the testing and in late January were joined by Suncor Energy Inc. and Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment, Agrawal said.

Bank of Nova Scotia, Loblaw Companies Ltd., Shoppers Drug Mart, Magna International Inc., Nutrien Ltd. and Canada Pension Plan Investments are expected to begin testing soon.

It wasn't hard to get the companies on board, said Agrawal, because everyone is eager to reduce the spread of the virus and lift severe lockdown measures that have closed businesses across Canada and forced others into bankruptcy.

"I think they look across the country and all they see is carnage. Economic carnage," said Agrawal.

Suncor joined the consortium with the aim of developing “a cost-effective system for reopening the economy during the COVID-19 pandemic in the absence of widely available vaccines or treatments,” spokesman Paul Newmarch said in an email.

The company has started piloting rapid testing with a targeted group of essential workers at Suncor’s base plant in the Wood Buffalo region of northeastern Alberta, he said.

“Our focus right now is to pilot rapid screening for our essential workers,” Newmarch said, adding that the company is working towards getting additional pilots up and running in other areas across the country.

Loblaw spokeswoman Catherine Thomas said a handful of Shoppers Drug Mart locations and one of the pharmacy’s distribution centres in the Toronto area are participating in the rapid testing program.

“We’ve already been conducting asymptomatic PCR tests at pharmacies in Ontario and Alberta, and believe expanding to rapid tests will complement the ongoing testing work and help reopen our country safely,” she said in an email.

Meanwhile, the lab got executives from the companies together at the start of the pandemic when he realized that a "novel" health crisis would also need novel solutions.

They formed a "vision council" and convinced Mark Little from Suncor, Galen G. Weston of Loblaw and Shoppers Drug Mart and Don Walker from Magna to join.

Former Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney and author Margaret Atwood took part as "thought leaders."

After presentations and poring over plenty of numbers, they decided to put up their money and time and agree to share data as they experiment with rapid testing.

Two retired military generals with experience in Afghanistan were called in, and they began rehearsing how to make the testing as efficient as possible.

They reduced the entire screening process from seven minutes per person to 90 seconds.

"They keep trying to chisel down the time and expense," Agrawal said.

"For example they had a medical professional doing Step 1, 2 and 3 and they realized we don't need a medical professional doing step two and that brings the cost down."

The pilot tests workers twice a week and makes use of millions of rapid tests obtained by the federal government and dispersed across provinces, who were allowed to allocate them for businesses.

Agrawal considers the PCR tests the "gold standard" because they're considered to be more accurate than rapid tests and are being used by most provincial COVID-19 assessment centers.

He expects the rapid tests will generate some false positives, but not many.

"So far, there's only been a few cases and they've all been confirmed by the PCRs," he said.

Once the kinks are all worked out, Agrawal hopes to scale the system quickly, but he warns rapid antigen tests can't work alone.

"They're not going to solve (COVID) alone, but when we combine them with other things like PCRs and rolling out the vaccines, they're just one piece of the puzzle, but a critical one."

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 1, 2021.

Companies in this story: (TSX:AC, TSX:L, TSX:BNS, TSX:RCI, TSX:MG, TSX:SU, TSX:NTR)

Tara Deschamps and Brett Bundale, The Canadian Press
Originally published Mon., February 1, 20

Pandemic Watchdog Is Probing Mnuchin, Cruz Roles in Fed Lending

Laura Davison
Updated Mon., February 1, 2021,

(Bloomberg) -- A federal watchdog is looking into former Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin’s decision to roll back the U.S. Federal Reserve’s emergency lending programs at the end of 2020, an issue that has become a point of partisan tension in Congress.

The Special Inspector General for Pandemic Recovery is also inquiring into Texas Republican Senator Ted Cruz’s role in persuading the central bank to expand the eligibility rules for the Main Street Lending Program to make it easier for oil and gas companies to apply for the low interest rate loans.

The probes were revealed in the watchdog’s quarterly report released Monday.

The investigations, led by Brian Miller -- the special Inspector General in charge of overseeing the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve’s response to the pandemic -- could shed more light on Mnuchin’s decision and legal basis for winding down the programs, which Democrats say was politically motivated.

The probes mark some of the biggest moves yet for Miller, a Trump appointee, who has said he struggled to begin his oversight work since he was confirmed by the Senate in June because of technical challenges and the time needed to hire experienced staff.

Sarah Breen, a spokeswoman for SIGPR, said that Treasury responded to the inquiry about the Fed facilities on Jan. 19, the final full day of Trump’s administration. She said that any concerns abut the discontinuation of the Fed facilities was rendered moot because of the compromise lawmakers reached in the December stimulus legislation, though that position may not reflect the views of the current administration. Breen also said that they have not received a reply to the Jan. 6 letter about Cruz’s influence on the Main Street Lending Program.

Cruz’s office didn’t have an immediate response.

Stimulus Debate

The future of the Fed’s emergency lending powers was a key point of debate leading up to passage of pandemic relief legislation in December. Republicans pushed to make it more difficult to revive the programs and Democrats wanted to preserve the emergency lending structures. The two parties eventually reached a compromise allowing Congress to approve similar facilities in the future after stalling the stimulus bill for days.

Mnuchin in mid-November said at year’s end he would pull unused money authorized by the Cares Act in March to back Federal Reserve emergency-lending facilities. The Treasury also unveiled plans to park those funds, along with other left-over lending authorization -- some $455 billion in all -- into the department’s general fund, over which Congress has authority, rather than the Exchange Stabilization Fund, over which the secretary has greater discretion.

Lawmakers including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi argued that the actions amounted to a misreading of the law and were politically motivated to hamstring the incoming Biden administration.

The probe also looks into changes made to the Main Street lending process, which Senate Democrats have said allowed indebted oil and gas companies to qualify for loans that should have gone to other companies hampered by the pandemic.

Energy companies accounted for 13% of all loans made through the Main Street program as of the end of November, according to BailoutWatch, a climate advocacy group tracking government stimulus spending.

Several Trump administration officials, including Energy Secretary Dan Brouillette and Mnuchin, worked with the Fed when the program was first being designed to allow for more mid-size companies, and therefore also energy companies, to access the facilities, Brouillette said in May.

The Fed said at the time that it didn’t make modifications to the program to specifically accommodate energy companies. By law, its emergency facilities can’t target specific sectors.

In total, SIGPR says it has five preliminary investigations underway and that it received and vetted 27 complaints during the most recent quarter. The report did not say when it plans to publish any of its findings.

“SIGPR’s aggressive preparation --while investigations and audits are by necessity and design conducted behind the scenes -- will remain largely invisible to the public until charges or complaints are filed or audits are announced,” the report said. “Ferreting out financial fraud is complex and takes time.”


©2021 Bloomberg L.P.
Originally published Mon., February 1

Battery metals shortage threatens EV boom: 

Sherritt CEO

Jeff Lagerquist
Updated Mon., February 1, 202
Yahoo Finance Canada

Sherritt International (S.TO) is finally in the right place at the right time, according to the company’s departing CEO. The Canadian miner is counting on strong demand for electric vehicles to boost nickel prices as a global supply crunch looms for the key battery ingredient.

With automakers pouring billions into EV development, governments championing lofty climate goals, and more drivers looking to go electric, Sherritt is pinning its future on its open-pit Moa mine in Cuba. The joint-venture, half-owned by the Cuban government, sends mixed sulphides to Sherritt’s facility in Alberta to be refined into finished nickel and cobalt products.

“Things are all coming into alignment for us all at once after five, six, seven years of slogging in the wilderness of low nickel prices and dealing with debt,” David Pathe told Yahoo Finance Canada in an interview.

Board chair Richard Lapthorne called Pathe’s nine-years stint in the top job “as difficult to manage as any the company has faced in its over 90-year history” when Sherritt announced it was looking for new leadership last November.

He wasn’t kidding. Sherritt bought a mine in Madagascar in 2007 for $1.6 billion, just as nickel prices hit all-time highs. When Pathe took over as CEO in 2012, nickel consistently sold for about a third of peak prices, saddling the company with a money-losing project on top of hefty debts.

Pathe also led Sherritt as U.S. President Barack Obama took historic steps to normalize American-Cuban relations beginning in 2015. When Donald Trump took office in 2017, the U.S. reimposed restrictions, leaving the island nation without enough foreign currency to pay Sherritt’s utility arm. Trump recently put Cuba back on America’s list of state sponsors of terror, blocking newly-elected President Joe Biden from quickly reverting to Obama-era policies.

With Biden in the White House, a major balance sheet overhaul completed in August, and the costly Madagascar mine off the books, Sherritt is hunting for a successor to run the company as a tech-driven, low-cost nickel producer for the growing EV market.

EV batteries are expected to command as much as 37 per cent of global nickel production by 2040, according to the consulting firm Wood Mackenzie. (Photo by Brendon Thorne/Getty Images)

Lithium ‘supply crunch’ looms

While Sherritt’s total nickel output is a fraction of mining giants like Vale (VALE), Russia's Norilsk Nickel and BHP’s (BHP) operations in Western Australia, Pathe said the focus among its larger peers has been producing cheaper grades of the metal for making stainless steel.

EV batteries are expected to command as much as 37 per cent of global nickel production by 2040, according to the consulting firm Wood Mackenzie, up from just seven per cent in 2020. However, Sherritt estimates more than 70 per cent of the total nickel supply in 2025 will be lower quality, and therefore useless to the EV battery market.

“For some metals, the energy transition could be like the Chinese economic boom on steroids,” Wood Mackenzie analysts said in a report released in September, predicting nickel demand will increase by two-thirds by 2040.

Pathe points to years of weak prices to explain why no new significant class one nickel capacity has been added since the financial crisis. His shortage prediction follows a public plea from the highest-profile executive in the automotive world.

In July, Tesla (TSLA) boss Elon Musk said he would offer miners “a giant contract for a long period of time” if they can produce nickel in an environmentally sensitive way.

“We think there is a coming supply crunch, particularly on the class one nickel side,” Pathe said. “We’re now well positioned to take advantage of that. If battery demand comes anywhere close to meeting some of the projections for the next five, 10, 15 years, there simply isn’t enough class one nickel production to meet demand.”
Automakers wary of upstream investment

The long-awaited shift to electric vehicles is gaining traction as governments in Canada and the United States build EV adoption into their respective plans for net zero emissions by 2050.

In Canada, General Motors (GM), Ford (F), and Fiat Chrysler (FCAU) each announced billion dollar investments to produce electric vehicles in Ontario in the last six months. Last week, GM said it plans to make all of its global operations and vehicles carbon neutral by 2040, and sell only zero-emissions vehicles by 2035.

The cash price for nickel on the London Metal Exchange pushed above US$18,300 per tonne in January, its highest level since February 2019, before retreating below US$18,000 to end the month. According to Wood Mackenzie, that’s too low to incentivize miners to produce enough battery metals for “a large number of EVs in a short space of time.”

Pathe expects automakers will forge closer ties with miners, either through long-term off-take contracts or financial stakes in companies, in order to lock in high-quality supply at a consistent price.

Wood Mackenzie notes Tesla, GM, Volkawagen (VOW.DE), Toyota (TM) and Honda (HMC) already have partnerships with battery producers. However, they said the auto industry is wary of investing too far “upstream” in mining assets.

“We have noted OEMs like Tesla and BMW signing off-take deals for metals directly with mining companies. However, with the exception of a few small examples, OEMs are yet to take the plunge in terms of investing in mining,” Wood Mackenzie analysts wrote in a report. “The relative scarcity of battery raw materials, and the potential scramble for them, may warrant a change in attitude.”

Don DeMarco, an analyst at National Bank who covers Sherritt, said it’s “certainly possible” that miners and automakers will team up to maintain a steady supply of battery metals and hedge against volatile commodity prices. Pathe said Sherritt does not name its customers publicly for competitive reasons.

“What I will say is we’ve seen an uptick in investor interest, and the number of meeting requests,” he said. “I think you’ll see the automakers generally doing interesting things in the next two to three years.”

Sherritt’s Toronto-listed stock has climbed more than 150 per cent in the past six months, against a backdrop of improving nickel prices. However, shares remains more than 95 per cent below their all-time peak in 2007, around the time of the company’s ill-fated foray in Madagascar.

Editor's Edition: Biden is surrounded by 'climate hawks'

Joe Biden has not wasted any time in advancing his clean energy agenda. The 46th American president nixed the Keystone XL pipeline and rejoined the Paris Climate Accord on his first day in office. He also appointed a number climate hawks to key positions in his administration, signalling that green thinking will guide key departments such as treasury and transportation for the next four years. Tom Rand, managing partner at ArcTern Ventures, tells Yahoo Finance Canada that's it's hard to overstate how bullish a Biden White House is for clean tech investment. That sentiment has fuelled a stock market rally for companies in the electric vehicle and renewable energy sectors since the election, as well as warnings about a second clean technology bubble. In Canada, Rand expects lawmakers to be more willing to embrace climate-focused policies and support the clean tech sector with financial incentives as their counterparts south of the border increasingly link climate and the economy. He said investors would be wise to follow developments at the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for hints about how America plans to modernize its electricity grid, and which companies stand to benefit. Those developments, he said, often carry over to Canada.

EV PRODUCTION IN CANADA

Ford Motor Co. of Canada names veteran executive Bev Goodman as CEO

THE SOUND OF ANOTHER GLASS CEILING BREAKING

Updated Mon., February 1, 2021, 


OAKVILLE, Ont. — Ford Motor Co. of Canada Ltd. has promoted executive Bev Goodman, a 25-year veteran of the Oakville automaker, to the job of president and CEO.

The company said she replaces Dean Stoneley, who will be appointed to the newly created position of general manager, North America truck, at Ford Motor Co.

Goodman began her career at Ford of Canada as a finance intern and she had experience in a variety of roles at the automaker including finance, parts and service, and sales and marketing.

She most recently was Ford of Canada’s director of marketing communications.

“At this time of rapid change in the auto industry, Bev demonstrates a deep understanding of what matters most to our customers now, and in the future," Kumar Galhotra, Ford's president of the Americas and International Markets Group, said in a statement.

"She also has a proven track record of working collaboratively with our dealer partners and a commitment to innovation as Ford accelerates its efforts to deliver high-quality, high-value vehicles and services.”

Goodman said she looks forward to "embracing new ways to serve our customers across the country" as the company introduces vehicles like the Mustang Mach-E, Bronco and F-150 hybrid.

“We’ll focus on delivering the benefits of electrification and connectivity to consumers, including plans for the C$1.8-billion transformation of our Oakville Assembly Complex to a battery electric vehicle manufacturing facility and continuing to grow our advanced connectivity and innovation centres,” she said in a statement.

Ford employs 7,000 people in Canada, while an additional 18,000 work in more than 400 Ford and Ford-Lincoln dealerships.

The automaker announced in September that it would spend $1.95 billion in its Canadian plants, including $1.8 billion toward the production of electric vehicles in Oakville, Ont.

In September, Unifor members working at Ford of Canada voted 81 per cent in favour of a new three-year collective agreement.

Goodman's promotion to president and CEO is effective immediately, the company said.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 1, 2021.

RECESSION

'It's gonna be ugly:' Newfoundland and Labrador's billion-dollar elephant in the room

Updated Mon., February 1, 2021



ST. JOHN'S, N.L. — When Saskatchewan nearly went bankrupt in the 1990s, there was a joke told repeatedly in the province, according to economist Jason Childs: "What do you get your kids for graduation? Luggage."

The financial problems of the prairie province in the early 1990s are playing out today in Newfoundland and Labrador, but experts say the issue is not getting enough attention during the election campaign, which is almost halfway done.

Ottawa eventually bailed out Saskatchewan — after that province dropped an austerity budget that included rural hospital closures and service cuts, leading to some small towns emptying out and disappearing. Newfoundland and Labrador will likely have to take similar measures, Childs, professor at University of Regina, said in an interview Monday.

The Atlantic province of about 520,000 people is on the brink of insolvency, with a net debt of $16.4 billion. The province spends more on debt servicing than on any government service other than health care.

"It is going to hurt a lot," Childs said, about the sacrifices the province will have to make to course correct. "Is it doable? Yes. Is it pleasant? Absolutely not." The government should begin by shoring up mental health services because people are going to need them, Childs added.

Saskatchewan's brush with insolvency comes up frequently in discussions about Newfoundland and Labrador's finances, but there are stark differences between the two provinces' situations, say both Childs and Russell Williams, a political scientist at Memorial University in St. John's.

Saskatchewan's economy began to rebound shortly after Ottawa stepped in. Newfoundland and Labrador's economy, by contrast, shows no signs of rebounding, Williams said in an interview Monday. The province's offshore oil industry is still in trouble, he added, despite recent cash injections from the federal government.

Any decision to further support the oil and gas industry would need Ottawa's backing because Newfoundland and Labrador doesn't have any more money to distribute. "We don't have the ability to make direct policy interventions without help from the federal government on a case-by-case basis," he said.

Williams said he likens Newfoundland and Labrador's situation to a kind of receivership, where the lenders are the ones with the real power to make decisions. And with voting day on Feb. 13, only Progressive Conservative Leader Ches Crosbie has brought up in any significant way the possibility the province is going bankrupt, he added.

Though Williams doesn't agree with Crosbie's claims he'd be able to strong-arm Ottawa into an arrangement that suits the province, he said he's glad at least someone is talking about it.

Williams said he doesn't think Ottawa would let the province go bankrupt. Instead, he said, the province will have to ask the federal government to pay off its creditors. "What kind of system is going to be in place to help give Newfoundland and Labrador some debt relief? What requirements is the federal government going to attach to that debt relief? And how much debt relief is coming?"

Williams said he worries that discussion and answers to those questions will be kept behind closed doors. Liberal Leader and incumbent Premier Andrew Furey assembled an economic recovery team in the fall, but after a dramatic resignation by a provincial labour leader, it was revealed that members had to sign a non-disclosure agreement. Voters will not see a first draft of the team's findings or its recommendations before the election.

As for Ottawa, Childs said there's likely not much appetite to provide the same type of relief given to Saskatchewan. There are a few provinces in trouble because of the COVID-19 pandemic, Childs said, noting that Ontario's debt-to-GDP ratio is only slightly lower than Newfoundland and Labrador's. "Is there going to be a lot of support for bailing out Newfoundland (and Labrador) at the federal level, when Ontario is in arguably as much trouble?" he asked.

That reality leaves Newfoundland and Labrador in a difficult place, Childs said, adding, "It's gonna be ugly." But there are some lessons to take from Saskatchewan's experience, he said.

Childs said that In 1993, then-Saskatchewan NDP premier Roy Romanow identified a few key services government wanted to protect: kindergarten to grade 12 education as well as health care and social services. Romanow put everything else on the chopping block and did his best to communicate with citizens, Childs said.

"He said: 'Here are the books. What do we do?' and had that conversation in a meaningful way," Childs said. "And he got re-elected."

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 1, 2021.

Sarah Smellie, The Canadian Press
Originally published Mon., February 1, 2021, 3:39 p.m.

Democrats Probe Tyson, Smithfield, OSHA Over Covid Outbreaks

Laura Davison 
Bloomberg
Updated Mon., February 1, 2021



(Bloomberg) -- A Democratic-led House panel is launching a probe into coronavirus outbreaks at meatpacking plants and whether the Occupational Safety and Health Administration adequately enforced worker safety rules.

Representative James Clyburn, who chairs the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis, sent letters Monday to Tyson Foods Inc., Smithfield Foods Inc., and JBS USA requesting information on the number of sick employees, facility closures, safety measures and leave policies for when workers tested positive. Almost 54,000 workers at 569 meatpacking plants in the U.S. have tested positive for Covid-19, and at least 270 have died, Clyburn said in the letters.

Meatpacking companies “have refused to take basic precautions to protect their workers, many of whom earn extremely low wages and lack adequate paid leave, and have shown a callous disregard for workers’ health,” the letters to the companies said.

Tyson shares slipped 0.2% in New York trading after earlier falling by as much as 2.7%. Brazil-based JBS rose 0.2% in Sao Paulo trading after dropping as much as 1.7% following the announcement of the probe.

Clyburn also asked OSHA to explain the relative lack of citations and penalties issued against meatpacking plants under the Trump administration as the facilities became an epicenter of spread for the virus.

“OSHA issued penalties related to the coronavirus totaling over $3.9 million, but the agency issued only eight citations and less than $80,000 in penalties for coronavirus-related violations at meatpacking companies,” the letter said.

A spokeswoman for the Department of Labor said the letter and its request are focused on the Trump administration’s actions and that the current administration is committed to working with Clyburn to protect workers. On Friday, OSHA issued new guidance calling for stronger workplace protections for the virus.

OSHA’s response to the pandemic under Trump was an “utter failure” that “cost workers their lives,” and the probe is “welcome news,” said Mark Lauritsen, director of food processing and meatpacking for the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union.

“We need to answer questions on why it was such a complete failure and what were the factors that influenced the Trump administration and OSHA to basically do nothing while workers were suffering, so it will never happen again,” Lauritsen said.

Gary Mickelson, a spokesman for Tyson, said in a statement that the health and safety of workers is the company’s top priority and that they’ve implemented virus testing and added a chief medical officer to help respond to health guidelines in the wake of the pandemic.

Keira Lombardo, Smithfield’s chief administrative officer, said in a statement that the company has taken “extraordinary measures” to protect employees that exceeded governmental guidelines and that it looks forward to correcting “inaccuracies” about the virus spread at meat plants.

JBS has invested in safety measures and facility modifications and welcomes the opportunity to share “our response to the global pandemic and our efforts to protect our workforce,” according to a statement from the company.

Hot Spots

The spreading virus made meat plants among the early hot spots in the U.S. pandemic, forcing facilities to shut temporarily.

Meat companies spent hundreds of millions to install work-station dividers, sanitizer stations, temperature scanners and to add medical personnel. “Comprehensive protections instituted since the spring” cost more than $1.5 billion, according to Sarah Little, a spokesperson for the North American Meat Institute.

Public health reviews have suggested the outbreaks in meatpacking plants seeded the subsequent spread in the surrounding communities, with one study by researchers at University of Chicago and Columbia University tying as many as 1 in 12 cases of Covid in the early stage of the pandemic to meat-processing facilities

The low OSHA penalties have drawn criticism from Democrats, including Senators Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Cory Booker of New Jersey. Lawmakers have pointed to the meatpacking industry as an example of how companies have failed to protect poorly paid front-line employees.

OSHA has defended the size of the fines. In reference to a $13,494 fine against Smithfield Foods -- after 1,300 workers at the meat-packer’s Sioux Falls, South Dakota, plant tested positive for the virus, 43 were hospitalized and four died between March 22 and June 16 -- OSHA said it was the maximum penalty allowed by law.

Clyburn set a Feb. 15 deadline for OSHA staff to brief lawmakers and for the companies respond with the requested data.

(Updates with union comment beginning in eighth paragraph.)

For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com

Subscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.

©2021 Bloomberg L.P.

Originally published Mon., February 1, 2021

CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M

LuLaRoe to pay $4.75M to settle pyramid scheme lawsuit

Updated Mon, February 1, 2021

SEATTLE (AP) — The California-based multi-level marketing business LuLaRoe is paying $4.75 million to settle allegations from the Washington state Attorney General’s Office that it operated as a pyramid scheme.

LuLaRoe sells leggings and other clothing to a network of independent retailers, who can recruit other retailers to sell the company’s products.

Attorney General Bob Ferguson sued the company and its executives two years ago, saying they deceived people about how profitable it was to be a LuLaRoe retailer. While two people at the top made millions from 2016 to 2019, thousands of others were left with debt and unsold product, which they couldn't return due to the company's complex and misleading refund policy, he said.


Ferguson said that $4 million of the settlement will be distributed to about 3,000 Washington residents who were recruited to the company. “Every Washington retailer who lost money under LuLaRoe’s pyramid structure will receive restitution,” his office said in a news release.

The company denied wrongdoing in a consent decree filed late Monday in King County Superior Court in Seattle, but the agreement prohibits LuLaRoe from operating a pyramid scheme and requires it to be more transparent with retailers. Among other things, it must publish an income disclosure statement that accurately details how much retailers might earn.

Ferguson said LuLaRoe's structure violated the state's anti-pyramid scheme law, which defines enterprises as pyramid schemes if they offer the opportunity to earn compensation primarily from recruitment, rather than retail sales.

LuLaRoe did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment Monday.
Originally published Mon, February 1, 2021, 7:14 PM

CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M
Exclusive-Mexican tax authorities to seek over 

$500 million from Canada's First Majestic

Daina Beth Solomon
Updated Mon, February 1, 2021

FILE PHOTO: Silver bars and coins are stacked in safe deposit boxes room of the ProAurum gold house in Munich

By Daina Beth Solomon

MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - Mexico's government plans to seek more than $500 million from Canadian miner First Majestic Silver Corp in what it says are owed taxes for artificially keeping its silver prices low over the past decade, two sources told Reuters.

Audits dating back to 2010 show that the company owes about 11 billion pesos ($534.36 million), the sources said.

So far, Mexico's Tax Administration Service, or SAT, has sought 5.5 billion pesos ($267.18 million) in tax debt, with the remaining half of the total yet to enter into formal disputes, according to the sources.

Officials are also doubling down on an effort to criminally prosecute First Majestic's local unit, Primero Empresa Minera, for tax fraud related to the scheme, even after a judge held off on filing charges on Thursday, the sources and another person with direct knowledge of the case said.

Under President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, authorities have taken a hardball approach to squeezing taxes out of companies, warning that tax dodgers could face criminal charges and jail time.

The Mexican leader has threatened to personally expose companies with major tax debts, and has called out Canadian mining firms in particular, without naming them.

First Majestic, a Vancouver-based company that owns three working mines in Mexico with another eight in various stages of development, did not respond to a request for comment.

The company has previously said it has made several proposals to resolve taxation disputes with Mexico, and its latest filings show that Mexico's tax authority has called for $219 million in reassessments.

According to the government's analysis, Primero Empresa Minera, which First Majestic bought in 2018, set its silver prices below market value in a system similar to transfer pricing used by multinationals to shift profits to low tax havens.

Mexico's government won one battle against First Majestic in September with a court ruling that nullified Primero Empresa Minera's pricing arrangement. First Majestic has said it would appeal the decision.

Officials last year also drew up criminal charges, in line with a recent reform that classifies tax fraud over 7.8 million pesos as a serious crime. According to an official document dated April 2020, reviewed by Reuters, prosecutors sought to recover from Primero Empresa Minera 426.3 million pesos ($20.71 million) in taxes owed in 2015 alone.

A judge in the northeastern state of Durango however declined to file charges last week, saying the tax authorities' audit of the company was incomplete. Prosecutors have appealed the ruling, arguing the full audit was not necessary, said one of the people familiar with the case.

SAT said it would not comment on ongoing investigations.

The finance ministry's tax prosecutor Carlos Romero declined to comment on First Majestic or Primero Empresa Minera. However, in circumstances when a full audit is requested, he said the prosecutor's office could file a fresh complaint once the audit is complete.

"We fight to the very end," he said.

Still, a decision on the appeal could be months away.

First Majestic's shares surged more than 30% after Bloomberg reported on the court's decision, the same day as a surge in silver stocks.

Mexican tax authorities reaped payments from nearly 900 large companies last year in their bid to boost state coffers in the country with the lowest tax take in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. In two of the biggest deals that were made public, Walmart Inc's Mexico unit and Coca-Cola bottler Femsa forked over nearly 17 billion pesos.

($1 = 20.5855 Mexican pesos)

(Reporting by Daina Beth Solomon; Additional reporting by David Alire Garcia; Editing by Frank Jack Daniel and Raju Gopalakrishnan)
Originally published Mon, February 1, 2021, 6:51 AM

Aviva Investors threaten to ditch top carbon emitters over climate inaction

By Simon Jessop

LONDON (Reuters) - Aviva Investors said on Monday it could ditch its stock and bond holdings in 30 of the world's biggest corporate emitters of carbon if their boards failed to take sufficient action over climate change.

The move comes as asset managers including BlackRock and Legal & General Investment Management look to ratchet up the pressure on companies to form a plan to transition to a lower-carbon economy, ahead of the next round of global climate talks.

The British asset manager, part of insurer Aviva and which manages 355 billion pounds in assets, said its Climate Engagement Escalation Programme would target companies in sectors including oil and gas, mining and utilities.

The programme would last between one and three years, depending on the specifics of the company concerned. Aviva declined to name the companies concerned, but is a big shareholder in leading oil majors including Royal Dutch Shell and BP.

Among the actions Aviva said it expects of the companies are that they commit to net zero carbon emissions by 2050 and ensure their plan to do so is in line with the Science-Based Targets Initiative, an NGO-led group that signs off on corporate climate plans.

The companies would need to integrate the climate goals into their business strategy, including capital expenditure plans; set short- and medium-term targets; align management pay with the goals; and ensure lobbying efforts supported the goals.

"For our engagement approach to have impact, it must be accompanied by a robust escalation process, including the ultimate sanction of divestment," Mirza Baig, Global Head of ESG Research and Stewardship, said in a statement.

Progress would be monitored on a six-month basis, with escalation measures open to Aviva including voting against directors at the companies' annual general meetings, filing shareholder resolutions and working with stakeholder groups to apply pressure, it said.

"This approach has the complete backing of our investment teams," said David Cumming, Chief Investment Officer for Equities at Aviva Investors.

"By fully integrating our approach across stewardship and the investment teams, we will be able to maximise our ability to influence the companies we have targeted towards positive climate strategies."

(Reporting by Simon Jessop; editing by David Evans)

Originally published Mon, February 1, 2021

Aviva to Divest From Companies That Don’t Act on Climate: FT

Max Zimmerman
Updated Sun, January 31, 2021


(Bloomberg) -- Aviva Investors, one of Britain’s top asset managers, will divest from oil, gas, mining, and utilities companies that do not meet its expectations on tackling climate change.

The London-based investor has written to the companies, calling on them to set net zero emissions goals and integrate climate risks into their strategy, including their plans for capital expenditure, the Financial Times reported, citing chief investment officer for equities David Cumming.

Cumming told the paper that climate change poses a huge risk to capital markets and that it is a massive disruptor. He said divestment was the last thing Aviva wanted to do but that “we will do it.”

Aviva will divest across both its equity and credit portfolio if companies fail to meet expectations over the next one to three years, he said. Aviva declined to name the companies it is targeting.

Aviva Investors manages 355 billion pounds ($486 billion) and has stakes in 30 of the world’s largest oil, gas, mining and utilities companies, according to the Financial Times. Cumming said he expected other asset managers to increasingly consider divestment as a response to companies’ efforts on climate change.


©2021 Bloomberg L.P.

CANADIAN EV'S TOO

Biden’s Green Energy Boom Could Send The Electric Car Sector Into Overdrive

Editor Oilprice.com
Updated Sun, January 31, 2021

Who will become the world’s first trillionaire?

New York Times journalist Kara Swisher thinks it might just be someone in green technology…

And she could be right.

Just look at the two richest men at the moment, Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk…

The Silicon Valley behemoths have a lot more in common than many might think.

Most importantly, they’re both heavily invested in green tech.

The two giants of industry have been at the forefront of the clean energy boom, driving innovation in the industry…

And now, with governments across the planet pumping billions of dollars into renewables, the tech superstars are ready to grab this trend by the horns and start collecting their next hundreds of billions of dollars in revenues.

And obviously, it’s not just about minting the first trillionaire. It’s a financial trend that’s transforming Wall Street from the button up.

Hedge funds are betting big on sustainability...but even that is driven by retail demand and growing pressure from a new generation of investors.

In fact, the biggest movers in the market over the past year have been green stocks, driven by new investors using platforms like Robinhood or WeBull. And the old school is struggling to keep up.

Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) cost short-sellers over $40 billion in 2020 alone …

NextEra (NYSE:NEE) has challenged Big Oil to become the darling of energy …

And growing support for alternative fuels has helped companies FuelCell (NASDAQ:FCEL) see over 600% returns...

And one Canadian company, Facedrive (TSX.V:FD, OTCMKTS:FDVRF), a pioneer of green ride-hailing in North America--is well-positioned to take full advantage of the looming energy transformation thanks to its forward-looking perspective and key acquisitions in the space.

Biden’s $2 Trillion Promise.

One of President Biden’s most important promises is his plan to spend $2 trillion on reimagining the country’s infrastructure.

This plan, which has seen support from both sides of the aisle, will focus on new technology and new sources of energy.

Importantly, this will include expanded EV purchase incentives to get more people driving them, and a 500,000-strong EV charging network by 2030.

It’s no wonder then that electric vehicle stocks are soaring, as this is a huge opportunity for companies like Tesla, and companies that use electric vehicles in their business like Facedrive.

For Facedrive, the timing could not have been better following the company’s September 2020 acquisition of Steer - the electric vehicle subscription business aiming to transform car ownership.

The acquisition of Steer also meant that the energy giant Exelon (NASDAQ:EXC) joined the Facedrive story, with a $2-million strategic investment by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Exelorate Enterprises, LLC.

So, just as Biden prepares a $2 trillion green infrastructure investment, Facedrive is building out its association with a major American utility and an up and coming EV subscription service that could become a disruptor.

The founder of Steer, Erica Tyspin, one of Forbes’ “Under 30 List” of top young entrepreneurs, is aiming to transform the auto industry by offering customers their own virtual EV showroom, in the form of a subscription service for on-demand car use. It’s an all-inclusive, user risk-free service that is 100% electric, plug-in, and hybrid.

For Facedrive, an ESG-focused tech ecosystem with multiple verticals, it’s the perfect match.

And if anyone is skeptical about conventional car drivers switching to Steer… the numbers might surprise you: 70% of Steer’s members have never driven an EV before. So the future of many electric vehicle drivers may well be subscription rather than ownership.

The ‘Biden Boom’ Is Bigger Than Steer ….

While Steer may be the new and exciting future of electric vehicle use, it is only the tip of Facedrive’s access to the ‘Biden Boom’.

The second exciting opportunity is its ride-hailing vertical.

As an industry, ride-hailing is worth $60 billion today and is set to top $85 billion by 2023. And while Uber and Lyft may have started this transportation revolution, they are no longer leading the way to the future.

The industry is responsible for huge amounts of pollution, and the new ‘clean’ ride-hailing movement is getting ready to transform the industry.

Uber is aiming to get to the point where 100% of its rides in American, Canadian, and European cities will be in electric vehicles by 2030, and Lyft has vowed to have 100% of rides across the board do the same.

But it was Facedrive (TSX.V:FD, OTCMKTS:FDVRF) that initiated this move. It offered customers a choice of EV, hybrid or gas way back in 2019 and offset emissions by planting trees.

Now, Facedrive is looking to push aggressively into the U.S. in order to take advantage of the energy transition.

From rising subscriptions for Steer’s EV service to a ride-hailing push, carbon offset food delivery, and even countering the spread of COVID, Facedrive is getting attention for all the right reasons.

Facedrive has aggressively acquired businesses for its ‘energy transition’ ecosystem, and these are where we might find the biggest beneficiaries of the coming ‘Biden Boom’.

As the Biden administration makes history with its ambitious climate plans, Facedrive will be a company to watch.

The EV Revolution Is Only Accelerating

Fisker (NYSE:FSR) is a newcomer in the electric vehicle scene. And it’s a speculative one, at that considering that It won’t start producing its EV SUVs until 2023. But again, it’s a story stock that looks a lot like Tesla did in the early days.

Citigroup analyst Italy Michaeli just picked up coverage of Fisker, with a “Buy” rating and a price target of $26. Michaeli gets the narrative here, reminding investors that “as a pre-revenue company, Fisker is clearly a higher-risk investment proposition”, but there’s a big reason to be bullish. Fisker has four long-term advantages here: It’s making an SUV, which Michaeli says is a good segment to target. It’s got a strong brand. It’s got a legacy behind the wheel: Henrik Fisker is Fisker’s founder and he’s a legend in automotive design. And it’s a massive saver of capital because it has an innovative “asset-light” approach, getting Magna International to assemble its first vehicle. It’s already got 9,000 advance orders … prepaid.

Though Fisker has underperformed on the market compared to NIO, Tesla, Xpeng or Li, it’s still trading on massive volume and in just one month, has already climbed by more than 64% since hitting a low in November. Clearly, investors are still waiting to see how the company will hold up, especially following the Nikola disaster.

Alternative Energy Stocks Are Booming

Billionaires couldn’t keep their hands off of Plug Power (NASDAQ:PLUG) this year, with giant BlackRock’s Larry Fink piling in heavily, among other heavy hitters. Why? Partly because Plug Power is already providing its hydrogen-powered tech solutions to big-name retailers, but overall, because the green revolution is clearly happening and unfolding as we speak. It helps that Plug's full-year guidance implies year-on-year sales growth of around 35%, even if profit won’t come for a while.

Morgan Stanley's Stephen Byrd believes green hydrogen will become economically viable quicker than investors appreciate saying Plug Power's deal with Apex Clean Energy to develop a green hydrogen network using wind power offers a chance to tap into "very low cost" renewable power and helps accelerate the shift to clean energy. Plug has a goal for over 50% of its hydrogen supplies to be generated from renewable resources by 2024.

The company has also just announced a partnership with Universal Hydrogen to build a commercially-viable hydrogen fuel cell-based propulsion system designed to power commercial regional aircraft. The initiative will help bring Plug's proven hydrogen ProGen fuel cell technology to new markets.

California-based Bloom Energy Corp. (NYSE:BE) builds and sells solid-oxide fuel cell systems. And, though, there has been a significant amount of cash burn, it’s an incredibly innovative company--and that’s what tech startups are all about. Growth, not necessarily immediate profit.

Bloom has recently announced a series of high-profile partnerships, including a JV with Samsung Heavy Industries and a second with a major South Korean engineering and construction company. Those partnerships could lead to a massive uptick in fuel cell deployments and analysts are looking at a potential for Bloom to increase its sales by seven times.

And this could all be about to get even bigger. Why? Because this relatively small company is thinking in huge terms: We’re not just talking about fuel cells for construction vehicles or to power remote electricity generation … Bloom is thinking far bigger than that. It’s targeting utility-scale applications of fuel cells and industrial-scale applications and drawing in some very big names in the process.

Thanks to Bloom’s innovative approach to this exploding market, it has seen its share price soar from $7.88 at the start of 2020 to $35.00 at the time of writing. In the stock world, a 300% plus return is never bad. And as this sector grows, so to could Bloom’s market cap.

FuelCell Energy (NASDAQ:FCEL) is another explosively volatile alternative fuel stock that has turned heads on Wall Street. Up over 100% year to date, FuelCell has been one of the most exciting companies to follow throughout the election season, with President-elect Joe Biden campaigning for a carbon-free America. In fact, analysts even estimate the U.S. could spend as much as $1.7 trillion on clean energy initiatives over the next 10 years. And that’s great news for companies like Blink, Plug and FuelCell.

Though many expect FuelCell to return to earth in the short-term, its long-term trajectory is solid. It has spent years building a patent moat and developing solutions that will tie into the energy transition perfectly.

FuelCell weathered it’s less-than-positive earnings report, but the company has managed to take advantage of the green energy boom and growing speculation about how the industry will flourish in the coming yearts.

Canada Is Also Jumping On Board

NFI Group (TSX:NFI) is one of Canada’s leaders in the electric vehicle space. It produces transit busses and motorcycles. NFI had a difficult start to the year, but it since cut its debt and begun to address its cash flow struggles in a meaningful way. Though it remains down from January highs, NFI still offers investors a promising opportunity to capitalize on the electric vehicle boom.

Recently, NFI has seen an uptick in insider stock purchases which is often a sign that the board and management strongly believe in the future of the company. In addition to its increasingly positive financial reports, it is also one of the few in the business that actually pay dividends out to its investors.

Not to be outdone, GreenPower Motor (TSX.V:GPV) a thriving electric bus manufacturer based out of Vancouver, is making mvoes on the market, as well. Although for the moment, its focus is primarily on the North American market, but its ambitions are much larger. Founded over a decade ago, GreenPower has been on the frontlines of the electric transportation movement, with a focus on building affordable battery-electric busses and trucks.

Year-to-date, GreenPower has seen its share price soar from $2.03 to $36.88. That means investors have seen 1700% gains this year alone. And with this red-hot sector only going up, GreenPower will likely continue to impress.

Magna International (TSX:MG) is a great way to gain exposure to the EV market without betting big on one of the new hot automaker stocks tearing up Robinhood right now. The 63 year old Canadian manufacturing giant provides mobility technology for automakers of all types. From GM and Ford to luxury brands like BMW and Tesla, Magna is a master at striking deals. And it’s clear to see why. The company has the experience and reputation that automakers are looking for.

Another way to gain exposure to the electric vehicle industry is through AutoCanada (TSX:ACQ), a company that operates auto-dealerships through Canada. The company carries a wide variety of new and used vehicles and has all types of financial options available to fit the needs of any consumer. While sales have slumped this year due to the COVID-19 pandemic, AutoCanada will likely see a rebound as both buying power and the demand for electric vehicles increases. As more new exciting EVs hit the market, AutoCanada will surely be able to ride the wave.

Like Magna, Westport Fuel Systems (TSX:WPRT) is another hardware and tech provider in the auto-industry.It builds products to help the transportation industry reduce their carbon footprint. In particular, it provides systems for less impactful fuels, such as natural gas. In North America alone, there are over 225,000 natural gas vehicles. But that shies in comparison to the global 22.5 million natural gas vehicles globally, which means the company still has a ton of room to grow!

By. Mark Beale
Originally published Sun, January 31, 2021, 3:00 PM