Tuesday, November 05, 2024

 

I Became an Anarchist While Working for the Democratic Party

From It's Going Down

A critical and personal account of working inside of and attempting to organize within the Democratic Party in Nevada.

by Jesse M.

There are three places in Las Vegas I truly liked: two of them were bars, and the third was Writer’s Block, a wonderful bookstore shaped like a literal block. It was here, a couple days into a job with the Nevada State Democratic Party, that I picked up Chomsky’s “On Anarchism” to get an introduction to the ideology.

It’s a terrible introduction to the ideology. Great bookstore, best ideology, not a very good book.

I start with this because I don’t want to mislead you. If I was a pure propagandist, I would say that this experience of working for the state Dems made me into an anarchist, when the truth is that I was thinking about it almost from the very start. Becoming an anarchist, however, helped me interpret what I was experiencing while I had the job.

I had worked in electoral politics before: fresh out of high school, age 18, I got a job on the Obama campaign, mostly because I wasn’t finding other jobs, and showing up to the Obama office to volunteer seemed a better use of time than trying in vain to get a job at Best Buy. So, I wasn’t a complete novice… but in 2008, I was mostly working with the IT department. Organizing was all new to me.

Backstory

Nevada’s caucus in 2016 went poorly. More accurately, the state convention went poorly, which you can go down a whole rabbit hole reading about, if you want. What’s important to establish is that the Hillary and Bernie sides absolutely hated each other. The Hillary side thought the Bernie Bros were violent, rampaging sexists who had threatened to kill the state party chairwoman; the Bernie side thought the whole process had been rigged against them in 2016. Because of all that, the most important thing was for 2020’s caucus to go smoothly: no one threatening to throw any chairs (if you mention “chair throwing” to anyone involved with Nevada electoral politics, you will get a long explanation of how this did or did not really happen), no one accusing anyone of fraud, just a simple, transparent process with a clear winner.

The Job

It was both a campaign job and it wasn’t: it was for a political party, and we were doing the same work (phonebanking, planning events, managing volunteers) that any political campaign would do. The difference was that this organizing for the 2020 Nevada Democratic Caucus wasn’t for any of the candidates, it was the neutral, referee-like logistical work to set up the volunteers running the caucus.

The most important thing to know about caucuses is that they suck and everyone hates them. Seriously, everyone. The progressive wing of the Democrats hate them because they’re undemocratic, forcing people to show up in person to a specific place at a specific time to participate, thus suppressing turnout (especially among the working class); the establishment wing of the party hate them because candidates like Bernie, with an extremely enthusiastic base who will do real voter-to-voter organizing, have a huge advantage.

The main difference between a caucus and a primary is that primaries are Official Elections: you go and vote in an election run by the government. A caucus is entirely party-run, and election rules (to my non-lawyer knowledge) essentially don’t apply to it, because it’s not technically an election. You can make them as accessible or inaccessible as you want, they’re events run by a political party to the rules of that political party. So, that means that the entirety of planning two of the first three elections in the primary cycle (up through 2020) was done on a shoestring by the state political parties. And that means they were organized by first-time political workers working way too many hours for not very much money, in way over our heads.

That’s me! I worked for the Nevada Dems from August 2019 through March 2020, making $3,250 a month. I had to find over a hundred people to volunteer to chair their precincts, spread across more than 20 locations across Nevada (my turf was basically everything south and east of Vegas).

Because paying people enough that they’d be able to afford housing would cost campaigns a lot more money, they instead rely on “supporter housing.” That means instead of your own place to live, some nice person or family lets you sleep in their guest bedroom for a while. On the one hand, it’s a great way for scrappy campaigns to get organizers on the ground with little cost, but even bigger campaigns have come to rely on it. It puts added pressure on the organizer to not act up and jeopardize your job: it’s one thing to not have paychecks in and risk getting evicted, but this isn’t even a formal living arrangement with a lease, it’s just some guy letting you sleep there because he wants to help the Democrats. And if you’re not with the Democrats any more, what then?

The hours for the job started off bad and got worse. At the beginning of the job, we worked five and a half days a week. With seven weeks until the election, our schedule changed: ten hour days, seven days a week.

There’s a certain amount of hours one can devote to something in a week before it takes over every other part of the brain. If you’ve ever played a video game so much that you can still see it when you’re trying to go to sleep, you’ve probably felt this; it’s called the “Tetris effect” in that sense. But it’s even worse when it happens with a job; in our case as electoral organizers, a job involving politics. Even when we would go out to the bar to drink after working 70 hours, there’s no way we could talk about anything else, because we hadn’t done anything else to think about. (I had a Tinder date with a gorgeous Bernie organizer, and I asked “can we talk about something else” at one point. I don’t think we did.)

So what did we spend those endless hours doing? A lot of phone calls. Early on, it was basically taking a shotgun approach and calling through our lists (at least 200 dials a day) of previous volunteers for the party or people our data had otherwise tagged as being potential volunteers (based on voting patterns, etc). Later on, once we had a good network of volunteers to rely on, we could set up phonebanks with them and otherwise outsource the work of recruiting more precinct chairs to those volunteers.

Especially early, calling people to get them to volunteer really sucked. Because of all the 2016 drama, the former Hillary supporters didn’t want anything to do with it because they thought a gang of Bernard Brothers would tear them limb from limb, and the Bernie supporters thought it would be rigged from the start. I was calling through a list of people to try to get them to run the caucus, and people were telling me they didn’t even want to participate.

In addition to our volunteer recruitment, we were required to get a certain number of new Democrats registered to vote per week; something about this got us money from the national DNC. My true “welcome to Vegas” moment was standing on the asphalt outside a Wal-Mart when it was close to 100 degrees registering people to vote. Being a Seattleite, I didn’t put on any sunscreen, and got a glorious sunburn followed by a farmers’ tan in about two days. (Wal-Mart kicked us out of their parking lot. I found that the two best spots were at UNLV and outside a 99-cent store. UNLV was great because it had plenty of shade; the 99-cent store’s security not only didn’t kick me out, I registered one of them to vote.)

Our job was mostly self-directed, with metrics we had to hit that were based around results: this many precinct chairs, etc. We had trackers upon trackers in Google docs. Because I had pretty easy turf, I was hitting all my numbers without making their recommended/required phone calls per day, but since I was getting results, hey, no one cared.

This was interrupted by what I started calling “HQ Freakout Days,” when HQ staff went nuts over organizers not making enough phone calls, and we needed to stop all other work and just make X number of dials. Not any tangible result from them, just make that many phone calls. Basically, stop the actual work you’re doing and hit our made-up metrics instead, because we’re your boss. For those days, I made what I euphemistically called my “youth vote outreach” list, which was people 29 and under who we’d never contacted before. Because I knew none of them would ever pick up, and we only had to let it ring four times and hang up without leaving a message, I could get through over 100 of those in an hour, easily. That’s what they get for valuing input metrics over output ones.

I Hate our Electoral System

If you’re like most people, when you think of people who work in politics other than politicians, you think of morons like David Axelrod or James Carville who at one time had real jobs on campaigns, and now collect paychecks going on TV while a title like “Democratic strategist” appears under them. This infuriates me, firstly because that’s not a job. Watching them has made every media consumer think they, too, could be a “strategist” for their political party, like video game fans think they can be in charge of a video game developer as an “ideas guy” without being able to make anything.

Part of what makes our electoral system so terrible is its system of what jobs do exist. Most people who work in politics do so for very short stretches of time, like I did. If you make it through one campaign cycle and work into the next one, you’re an aged, rugged veteran. The person who hired me, two levels of experience above me, was 21 years old at the time.

When I say “our electoral system,” I don’t just mean the laws around how elections work. I mean the broader system of our two parties, the massive industry of consultants and pollsters either supporting or grifting them, and our news media treating the election like a two-year leadup to its Super Bowl.

When a campaign cycle starts up, like for the 2020 cycle, all the campaigns hire at once. There’s not nearly enough locals to hire to staff up every campaign’s offices across the state, so campaigns hire from wherever. It ends up being a lot of recent political science graduates who just want to Work In Politics for a bit. So, these 21 year-olds are airdropped in from New York, California, and Massachusetts to organize in Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, and South Carolina for six months. Then their job ends and they go back home. (Talking to one Buttigieg organizer, she sent resumes to every Democratic candidate and took the job with Buttigieg because that’s who got back to her first. We’re supposed to take seriously these people saying that democracy is at risk if we don’t vote, but they’re so apathetic about who wins that they’ll help any Democrat become president who pays them? Mind-boggling. “Blue no matter who,” truly.)

The electoral system is so focused on the specific immediate task at hand, the election these people were hired to win (and working people to the bone doing it), that there’s never any room to step back and build something long-term. No one is planning for the Democratic party five or ten years from now (at least, not in a way that affects local organizing) because that’s ten or twenty times as long as the average staffer is expected to last. The feeling seems to be that every minute spent planning for something further out than the next election is a minute not spent working on winning the next election.

So, when I get on my anarchist high horse now and talk about how we need to spend our time, energy, and money on something other than electoral politics, it’s not the voting part that upsets me. It’s all this bullshit. Every election, we have to burn out all our most promising organizers in six months because there was no infrastructure for them to build on, and they have to make it all from scratch every time. It’s like we’re working extra hard to pay off our last payday loan, then taking out a new payday loan at the end, ensuring we’ll have to do the same thing over again next time.

Classism in the Democratic Party

The “HQ staff,” the higher-paid people with the campaign, worked out of a building in a little office that housed some other campaigns. The field staff, such as myself, got to work there for maybe a few days of training, and then off to our new office: Panera Bread.

For about a month, despite constant promises that it was just around the corner, we didn’t have a field office. In the pre-COVID times when “work from home” was an alien concept, that meant that instead of doing our work from wherever, we all had to meet up at a local Panera Bread together at 9am six days a week and make calls there together. Five years later, I still can’t walk by a Panera Bread without shuddering.

When we did get our own field office, it wasn’t in the nice upscale office park that HQ was. I don’t mind that they found something outside of a white neighborhood–I’ll organize anywhere, and if it was my money, I’d certainly save money on rent that way–but it’s worth noting that the HQ staff didn’t choose to put themselves there. It was in what seemed to be an abandoned doctor’s or dentist’s office, and it didn’t have modern conveniences like “drinkable running water.” We had to carry jugs of water over from the gas station every day just to have something to drink, and if you’ve lived in Vegas without dying, you know you have to drink a lot of water.

Having a physical separation, by around a 15-minute drive, is a perfect metaphor for how the professional class of the Democratic Party sees themselves compared to the ordinary people of the field staff. We weren’t let in on any strategy discussions, we weren’t told any inside information (because they were certain we’d leak it), we weren’t even allowed to physically be around them.

Trying to Unionize

From the start, I was far more interested in trying to unionize the job than the job itself. I had developed a big interest in unions since I had gotten a union job at an AT&T store, gone on strike with CWA, joined DSA, gotten fired from AT&T, gotten my job reinstated through a grievance, and became a union steward. I had sent off a couple resumes to become an organizer at SEIU, to no success.

There was no shortage of issues to organize around: our pay sucked, with the next-lowest pay from a campaign being Bernie’s at $3,500 a month (they may have, ironically, suffered from unionizing first). Our mileage reimbursement was awful, which was a big deal for people like me who had to drive to rural areas of the state. Above all that, there was an overall feeling that the HQ staff just didn’t care about us at all.

I got my first organizing lesson when I reached out to a couple of the more senior field organizers on the campaign: what someone says their political beliefs are doesn’t mean shit when it comes to workplace organizing.

These two people were who, when I was first thinking of the idea of organizing, I assumed would be onboard. They were both Bernie-supporting DSA members. I called them up, and the response I got was some variation of, “I really need to maintain a good relationship with management because I need a promotion/letter of recommendation.” (They both left the campaign fairly quickly anyway.)

This would have been a small unit, around a dozen people, so every card signed mattered a lot. (In organizing electoral campaigns, unlike most others, voluntary recognition is assumed; forcing the workers to go through an NLRB process would be political suicide when your bosses are trying to keep leadership of various unions happy.) I reached out to Campaign Workers Guild, a scrappy independent union that represents some political campaign workers, including, most relevantly, some state parties. (Checking their website, Biden for President Harris for President organized with CWG! Great job, y’all.)

Because we were split between Vegas and Reno staff, the hardest part was getting anyone in Reno onboard. If it had just been a vote in Vegas, we would’ve won handily, but the only person to ever join up from Reno flamed out from the job within a week or two. (You should be getting the idea by now that people come and go from these organizing jobs very quickly.)

I thought we had a majority at one point: another organizer in Vegas, a local, someone I thought I was developing a good relationship with, a self-described anarchist, told me that they wouldn’t sign up first for fear of retaliation, but that they’d be the final card we needed. Okay, fine. So we got the other six cards, and I came to them to get the seventh card needed. Instead, they gave me a lot of objections that made it clear they never intended on signing in the first place. I went to my car and cried.

Our union attempt stalled, but with real pressing issues, the card-signing and non-card-signing people came to a separate course of action: we would draft a letter to management of things we wanted to change. Not a list of demands, but of requests. Things like more car mileage reimbursement, cell phone reimbursement, more pay, drinkable water, and even basic things like a weekly meeting with HQ staff so we could check in.

I took the letter to the HQ office and sat down the the Caucus Director and Executive Director of the party. First, they wanted to let me know how much they appreciated that it was requests and not demands. Then, we went down the list of everything: no, no, no, no, no. The only thing they agreed to was the weekly meeting, and I think we ended up having that all of once.

Knowing what I know now about organizing, this would have been a key step in an escalation plan: I could have gotten the non-card-signers to buy into a plan of, “okay, if this letter doesn’t get a serious response, what do we do next?”, but instead, it didn’t go anywhere. It was too close to the caucus to leave us time to make any change by that point.

Talking with a staffer who was there after I left, I heard they did end up unionizing with IBEW 2320.

The App

Like the essay equivalent of a Godard film, seven pages in I’ll start telling something resembling a story.

Part of the way the 2020 caucuses would be better than 2016, we were told, was that instead of an old-fashioned hotline to call in the results from each precinct, we would be using The App. Not just to report the results, but to run the caucus itself. Everything that happened in the caucus would be put into The App, which would guide you the whole way.

The problem we had was that this app didn’t exist. In our training presentation for how to be a precinct chair, only a few months before the caucus, we had essentially placeholder slides for “this is what you will be doing with the app, when we have it. Which we will. Just not now.”

Then, closer to the election, The App materialized. First, you had to download some extremely sketchy-seeming other app that seemed like a dev tool for testing apps that aren’t finished yet. Then, through that system, you had to download this caucus app.

As I had mentioned, I worked retail selling cell phones for about four years total, including a lot of senior citizens. Getting them onto their Facebook was hard enough. But for The App, we had to have a guide telling Android owners how to enable developer options so that they could download this app-before-you-download-The App. And then, one day in February, they’d have to use this app all on their own in a room full of potentially angry people, and this would have an impact on who would be the next president.

Why did they have to download some other app as a platform to download The App? Because it wasn’t finished yet. Not just in a way that it had a couple kinks to work out, it was blatantly, comically unfinished using it. Pressing the wrong button on nearly any screen would crash it. We weren’t just buying some off-the-shelf app to use, or maybe tweak a little bit; this company was making The App at the exact same time as we were training people how they’d be using it.

We had an event for all our precinct chairs where we were supposed to debut The App for the first time, and get them all to download it, and then run mock caucuses using it. This was, without exaggeration, the worst day I’ve ever had at a job in my life. No one could figure out how to get it on their phones, let alone run a caucus with it. There was too little support for too many people who needed help, and the help they needed, none of the staff knew how to help with. This had been the event we’d been building for, that we recruited all our best volunteers to all come to, and instead of teaching them how they’d run the caucus, we looked incompetent, understaffed, and scared.

It was at this point that the HQ staff could have seen that result, heard the feedback, and made the reasonable decision that The App was clearly not going to work. Instead, they just shrugged it off as something that would get better. The App is a work-in-progress, after all. (And we were just field organizers, what did we know?)

Then, February 3rd, 2020, the best possible thing for Nevada happened: Iowa stepped on the rake before we could. Maybe HQ staff could ignore their precinct chairs and the field organizers, but they couldn’t ignore that.

Overnight, everything changed. The state party that had no money to pay us for cell phone reimbursements had someone who was clearly a crisis communications consultant telling us extremely obvious shit in a conference call the next morning. Our digital media person told us very specifically not only were we not to talk about anything related to The App on social media, we couldn’t even “like” anything related to it, and they would be checking. (To see if they really would, I went and made my Twitter likes all dril tweets to see if anyone would notice. No one said anything.) While publicly, we were insisting that we had extremely real backup plans we were happy to use, in every video call with HQ it was obvious from the bags under their eyes that they had been working on coming up with a new plan instead of sleeping. The class separation of HQ from everyone else didn’t just hurt us in the lower class, it put way too much of a burden on the class exclusively allowed to make decisions.

A whole new group of people arrived: in the same office park as the HQ, a dozen or so people from the DNC came to… I don’t know what they did, exactly, but they were at their laptops and seemed very serious about it. All their food was catered for them.

Soon, we had a new plan: instead of The App, we now had a digital tool WHICH IS NOT AN APP on iPads to help precinct chairs report their results. The “tool” was a Google Form. We were told specifically not to tell anyone that it was a Google Form, but when one of my precinct chairs asked me straight up, “is this a Google Form?” I said… yeah. He responded, “oh, great! That’s just how I would have set it up. Thanks!” It was honestly pretty easy to use. Even the smartphone-averse could fill out a form on one of the iPads we provided.

Early Vote and the Caucus

Our job so far had focused not on the four-day early vote window, where people could “caucus” by filling out a form, but on the day-of caucus itself. When early vote came around, though, it was clear that everyone wanted to vote early instead of participate in another shitshow like 2016.

The field staff spent the day filling in at early vote sites that needed extra hands. At one library, I helped people cast their early vote ballots who had waited in line for five and a half hours.

The enormous volume of people who voted early meant that all the weight was taken off the day-of caucus, in terms of managing huge crowds of people. While we were working sixteen hours days during early vote, to get people through the lines, open and close sites, and then drive the ballots around, the caucus itself was smooth. I went to a small site with three precincts that only had one person there who wanted to be a precinct captain, so I ran one precinct as another one waited a bit over an hour for me to be done. They didn’t seem upset at all; if anything, they were grateful that it was just a little waiting around, and that someone who knew the process was running it.

After driving the final caucus boxes back to HQ, I spent time with the caucus director doing my favorite task of the entire six months: puzzling through the “problem precincts,” the ones with results that didn’t make any sense or that the precinct chair had clearly messed up. It was a fun bit of problem-solving, working through what it seemed like the precinct captain was trying to do, and essentially re-doing their work for them.

One thing I can say confidently is that I didn’t see any anti-Bernie foul play from anyone on the campaign. Everyone at HQ was firmly in the establishment Democratic camp, to be sure (as will come up soon), but they were first and foremost about covering their own asses and not having another 2016-like disaster on their hands. They just wanted a caucus where the story about it afterword would be about who finished in what place, not what a mess it was.

Fortunately for everyone’s asses being covered, the bottom-line result from the caucus was clear: Bernie won in a landslide, more than twice as many votes and delegates as runner-up Biden. Because it was such a blowout, none of the candidates were going to sue the party over this or that delegate being wrong.

For people following Bernie, you might remember this moment: probably the high point of morale for any reformist socialist or social democrat in the United States in many years. It’s hard not to connect Bernie’s impending doom with that other impending doom hanging over us at the end of February 2020.

The Stench

After all the votes were cast, it was time to clean up. The email-sending squad from the DNC had all left, and no one had been in their office for a couple days. They had left all their trash, including uneaten food, such as an entire chicken carcass from one of their catered meals. The field staff wasn’t allowed to be in the office nearby HQ, but we were required to go there to clean up after the more important people who were using it.

I was probably 20 feet from the door when our supervisor opened it and I got hit with a physical wave of stench. A childhood full of sinus infections leave me with a weakened sense of smell, but this wasn’t so much an odor as a steamroller, or a targeted command telling my body to retch.

Leaving

It was early March 2020, and I was convinced I never wanted to work in electoral politics again. I wanted to be a union organizer. With plenty of postings at union-jobs.com, I thought it would be pretty easy to find a position, so I declined the bosses’ invitations to stay on.

I ended up staying with my parents and collecting unemployment until I moved back to Seattle in 2021 instead.

After I Left

You might have heard about the entire staff of the party quitting, giving themselves a severance payment for doing so. If not, you should have, because I think it’s rather instructive.

Basically, someone from DSA (and it’s important to emphasize it was just “someone,” not a democratically-decided-upon DSA project) won the leadership of the party, so the Dems, instead of handing over the infrastructure, torched it instead. The same party that didn’t have the money to pay us handed over $450k that they just had sitting around to Cortez Masto’s fund.

State parties often run something called a “coordinated campaign:” basically, it doesn’t make sense to have entirely separate campaign structures for all these different Democrats in a state, so you’d have one campaign that would turn people out for all your candidates, whether they’re Governor, Senator, Representative, etc. Makes sense. The NV Dems always ran this in off-cycle elections. In 2022, though, that power was taken away from the state party, and given to Washoe County (where Reno is, about seven hours north of Vegas). But, with no staff, how was Washoe County, of all places, going to run this? By hiring a company of all the former NV Dems staff to do it, of course. (And I’d be surprised if they were unionized this time around, like they were before.)

Which leads me to some conclusions.

Conclusion I: Taking over the Infrastructure of the Democratic Party will not Work

Don’t try to take over the Democratic party like that, they’ll never just hand it over to you. Some people might protest that Trump’s bootlickers have successfully taken over local Republican parties from more establishment Republicans, but it’s a totally different scenario: none of the Republican officials want to piss off Trump, whereas Democratic ones would gladly piss off Bernie just because they hate him. The Republican party basically gets taken over by a new upstart wing every decade, from Nixon to Reagan’s hard-right to the neo-conservatives to Trump, but there’s no similar history for the Democrats.

Establishment Democrats will not weigh the pros and cons of socialist organizers and reasonably conclude that while they disagree on some economic issues, at least they’re on the same page about things like abortion rights and protecting LGBT people. They hate socialists with nearly the same passion that they hate Trump, and probably more than they hate pre-Trump conservatives. They will salt the earth and burn the infrastructure rather than hand it over to socialists.

Conclusion II: Electoral-Campaign-by-Electoral-Campaign Union Organizing isn’t a Long-Term Strategy

For those non-union-nerds out there, you might not realize how different the structure of SAG-AFTRA and the WGA are from other unions. I’m not an expert on them, but my basic understanding is that you don’t show up to a movie set non-union, and then organize it, go through the NLRB, and hope you get a contract before the movie finishes; people join the unions, which already have contracts with the studios covering the entire industry, and each production signs onto the existing union contracts. Then, those union members go to work for those productions that have agreed to the unions’ rules. Movies don’t use non-union labor because they’d get boycotted by all the other workers.

Campaign workers desperately need a similar system. Under the current (non-)system, only a minority of political campaigns are going to be unionized, and it’ll be a hodgepodge of wildly different contracts and pay rates, each negotiated individually. No one is covered on day one of a new campaign; you have to spend half your time fighting for the union while trying to do your actual job simultaneously.

How I’d imagine it working is that CWG forms an alliance with traditional large unions, and makes a demand of the DNC and other big organizations that every Democratic or “progressive” political campaign in the country needs to only use union labor, or else [insert thing the unions could threaten the DNC with here, use your imagination]. They negotiate a sector-wide contract. Then, anyone who gets a job on a campaign has to join the union and is covered under the contract from day one.

It’s not a perfect solution (and any anarchist reading this will certainly have reasonable objections about how top-down and not bottom-up it is), but as long as we’re running electoral campaigns, I can’t think of a better way to protect the workers.

Conclusion III: Electoral Politics is a Massive Sink of Resources and is Rewiring our Brains

Just like as workers, we worked such long hours that we lost the ability to talk or think about anything other than our jobs in electoral politics, as a country, we’ve focused so much on electoral campaigns that we’ve lost the ability to do or even think about non-electoral ways to make political change.

There’s nothing inherently wrong with voting, or registering other people to vote, but the all-encompassing focus on it means that everything else gets filtered through a vision where the only pathway is electoral changes. Imagine a conservative and a liberal see a news story about a strike on the docks by longshoremen. Conservatives are going to filter it through their Fox News propaganda and somehow link it to, “this must be because of DEI programs somehow.” Liberals are going to wonder how the strike impacts the election, and maybe whether it’s a ploy by a pro-Trump union to support him by tanking the economy. Neither is analyzing it as a political action on its own terms, without some external filter applied to it.

It’s not even that people are burning themselves out on electoral organizing (though some are); it’s just their focus, their news consumption. Liberals are reading the news and scrolling through five hours of takes on the election and the latest polls every day and feel exhausted from all the energy they’ve just put into politics, despite not doing anything productive.

It doesn’t even get better once the election ends: those people burned themselves out on electoral politics, and get hit with a wave of post-election exhaustion, like D&D characters after a Haste spell. Even if they were successful, once they’re done celebrating a win, they don’t put that same time into non-electoral work. They just go do something other than politics, and save up their time and attention for the next election cycle.

Conclusion IV: Anarchism!

We have to break the loop of stumbling in an exhausted haze from one election to another, over and over. We have to get people organizing, not for or against one candidate or party, but in ways unrelated to elections. Some people might argue that we need to devote some energy toward electoral politics, that we can’t just abandon it entirely. Maybe that’s true. But it feels like about 99% of our political energy is spent on electoralism. We have to move that balance toward everything else: organizing our workplaces into labor unions, our buildings into tenants’ unions, our neighborhoods into communities that will fight for each other when we have to. We have to do organizing that I, a straight white guy focused on workplace organizing, can’t even conceive of, because it’s outside of my personal experiences.

What ended up making me an anarchist was not just realizing that I didn’t think electoral politics was going to win us socialism, but seeing how it sapped resources that could be going into things that, just maybe, could. It was seeing not just that the Democrats are bad, but that the entire hierarchical structure that mandates some people make all the decisions and some people blindly follow orders is ineffective.

Control what you can control. You can’t decide the next president by yourself, so start small and build from there: talk to your immediate neighbors, your coworkers. We’re at a time uniquely deprived of community. We have to build community ourselves.

Los Angeles Teachers Union Votes to Support Effort to Block U.S. Military Aid


The Los Angeles teachers union voted to support a congressional effort to block $20 billion in U.S. military aid to Israel, providing an important example for the labor movement.



Emma Lee 
November 4, 2024
LEFT VOICE USA

United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA) and Service Workers International Union (SEIU) Local 99 held a joint rally outside Los Angeles City Hall, Los Angeles, Calif., on Wednesday, March 15, 2023. Photo by Caylo Seals, The Corsair.

In late October, the LA teachers union voted to support a congressional effort to block $20 billion in U.S. military aid to Israel. The genocide in Gaza, carried out by Israel and bankrolled by the United States and other imperialist powers, has lasted over a year and has expanded into Lebanon last month. The United States has provided more than 70 percent of the funding for Israel’s military operations since last October. Meanwhile, according to multiple polls, a majority in the U.S. believe that the U.S. should stop sending weapons to Israel.

“The arms named have been used in violations of U.S. and international law, indiscriminately killing large numbers of civilians, many of them children,” stated union materials prepared for a board of directors meeting, according to The LA Times. The motion for the resolution states: “It is our duty as educators to speak up for the protection of education and all young people and their families, especially when it is our tax dollars fueling this destruction and our government providing the arms. Furthermore, this directly affects our members; many UTLA rank and file have loved ones who have lost their lives or livelihoods due to this conflict.”

The United Teachers of Los Angeles (UTLA) called for California Senators Alex Padilla and Laphonza Butler to pledge their support for a joint resolution which would stop specific arms sales to Israel. The “Joint Resolutions of Disapproval” is expected to be taken up when the Senate reconvenes in November. The joint resolution is sponsored by Senators Bernie Sanders, Peter Welch, Jeff Merkley, and Brian Schatz. The UTLA did not release the vote tally, but it passed easily among those members of the union’s House of Representatives who attended the virtual meeting, according to sources of the LA Times.

A sector of LA teachers have been organizing for Palestine for years. In 2021, during the Israeli onslaught of Sheikh Jarrah, the UTLA chapter chairs passed a resolution calling for an end of U.S. aid to Israel, though the resolution was not passed along to the UTLA leadership or voted on by the rest of the membership. In March of this year, the UTLA joined the hundreds of unions in the U.S., including seven major unions such as the Association of Flight Attendants (AFA), Service Employees International Union (SEIU), United Auto Workers (UAW) and United Electrical Workers (UE), in calling for a ceasefire.
Zionist Opposition

Unsurprisingly, the resolution was immediately met with Zionist opposition. The Los Angeles Jewish Antisemitism Roundtable, which is a coalition of a number of Zionist groups, including the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), issued a public letter in opposition to the teachers union. In the letter, the group expressed their “profound concern regarding ULTA’s recent decision to adopt a resolution taking a one-sided position on the Israel-Hamas conflict.” The letter went on to claim that blocking military aid, “dismisses the complexity of this geopolitical crisis, ignoring Hamas’s well-documented and globally condemned attacks on innocent civilians.”

The group went on to not only dismiss the role of labor in taking a stand against the genocide, but also continue the tired tactic of conflating anti-Zionism with antisemitism: “Passing this resolution has no impact on the situation in the Middle East but serves to foster an environment of exclusion within LAUSD, further alienating Jewish students, teachers, and allies who feel increasingly unsafe.”

This conflation is taken straight from the playbook of the McCarthyist congressional hearings of higher education officials, and continues the pattern of heightened repression against the pro-Palestine movement by the state since the genocide began last October.

Zionist groups have organized petitions against the teachers union, saying that “UTLA needs to focus on local issues that directly impact our educational system.” The implication here is that the genocide does not directly impact education in the United States. Nothing could be further from the truth.

As rank-and-file UTLA members wrote in their letter in response to the Antisemitism Roundtable, “As educators in a nation where the military funding is ten times that of federal education spending, we are directly impacted by the scarcity resulting from American involvement in foreign wars.” Rather than funding crucial public services like education and healthcare for children in the U.S., enormous sums of money directed toward slaughtering Palestinian civilians, including tens of thousands of children. Those who remain have lost one or both parents, grandparents, siblings, cousins, teachers, and friends, and bear indescribable psychological trauma. Educators are not only nearsightedly concerned with the physically and mental wellbeing of the specific students sitting in our classrooms; we are deeply aware that the wellbeing of all children of the world is intertwined.

Moreover, by conflating justified outrage over a genocide with discrimination against Jewish community members, the Antisemitism Roundtable is not only suppressing freedom of speech, it is also casting the Jewish community as a monolith and ignoring the diversity of opinion that exists among Jewish people. As the rank-and-file response states, “The resolution in question was authored by a coalition of UTLA members, including Jewish and Middle Eastern educators.” Though the state of Israel uses Jewish identity as a cover for its genocidal, settler-colonial project, Zionism, based on displacement, apartheid, and occupation, does not represent the Jewish people, neither in the U.S. nor the world at large.
The Labor Movement Needs to Go Further

The pro-Palestine movement has energized rank-and-file workers to challenge the Zionist common sense of our union leaderships and demand an end to our unions’ complicity in the genocide. Yet the brutal events of the past year have proved to us that ceasefire resolutions are far from sufficient — and that rank-and-file workers are willing to fight for more.

The action by LA teachers is significant in that it not only calls for a ceasefire, a demand which has met its limits, but goes further by challenging U.S. military funding, reflecting the movement’s extended demands beyond a ceasefire and towards an arms embargo. But why should we limit ourselves to essential but limited measures like this Sanders-sponsored effort that blocks only “certain defense articles and services,” as the resolution states?

Members of UTLA should organize resolutions that go even further — to demand that their unions divest from Israeli companies and to end all U.S. aid to Israel. The New York State Nurses Association (NYSNA), for example, recently passed a resolution in support of a ceasefire and arms embargo, divestment of pensions from Israel, protection of workers engaging in political speech, and endorsement of only candidates who adhere to their principles. Organizing local chapters can serve to deepen the conversation about how to organize against U.S. imperialism within our unions and the wider labor movement.

There is nothing more urgent as workers in the United States than the task of organizing ourselves independently from the capitalist parties that support this genocide. Our union leaderships spend enormous resources organizing to campaign for Democrats — who continue to fund Israel’s military, as well as the police that crush our protests. The UTLA, for example, endorsed the Kamala Harris and Tim Walz ticket for president, along with other Democrats at all levels. The Chicago Teachers Union, which called for a ceasefire in January, uncritically supports Chicago mayor Brandon Johnson, who comes from their own ranks but now serves as Chicago’s top cop. Ahead of the DNC, Johnson organized a “labor truce,” in which union leaderships agreed to not strike during the DNC, crushing in advance the potential of what could have been a powerful show of solidarity among the working class for Palestine, and against the Democratic Party’s support for genocide.

When union bureaucracies undemocratically endorse capitalist politicians and organize dues-funded top-down election campaigns, they actively ignore the massive potential in their memberships for campaigns that resist the anti-worker, anti-immigrant, imperialist policies of both capitalist parties. Moreover, they undermine workers’ rights to democratically discuss and decide our unions’ priorities, orientations, and actions. With the upcoming presidential election results, we have to organize now to resist the continued U.S.-backed genocide of Palestinians, which will be supported by whichever capitalist presidential nominee who enters the White House in January.

Our Democrat-allied union and social movement bureaucracies go to great lengths to defend “lesser-evil” politics by decrying the impending “fascism” that will sweep the U.S. if Trump takes office. Of course, workers and oppressed groups every have right to despise the repulsive agendas of the Right. Yet these selective campaigns serve to distract workers from the attacks of the Democratic Party, which have occurred during the length of the Biden term, and will surely continue if not deepen under an apparently even more right-wing Harris presidency.

As rank-and-file workers, organizing independently means we have to fight for greater democracy within our unions. Fighting against capitalist exploitation — whether for bread-and-butter issues or against oppression — is inherently political, and therefore our unions are and should be political spaces. But our union leaderships are linked to both parties of capitalism — historically concentrated among the Democrats, but in the case of the Teamsters and other unions, have been turning toward the Republicans in a wave of “dealignment”.

Los Angeles, among other California cities, have provided a powerful example of labor action from just this year. Back in April during the wave of Gaza solidarity student encampments that swept the country, a Zionist mob physically attacked the UCLA encampment with fireworks, pepper spray, bats, and knives while the police stood by. In response, over 1,000 people mobilized at UCLA to defend the encampment and defend students against the Zionist attacks. Members of the labor movement in particular showed up and called for solidarity. How did workers respond? UAW 4811 — representing the UCLA graduate workers — released a statement calling for a strike authorization vote of the local to defend the encampment. Hundreds stayed and forced both the Zionists and the LAPD to retreat from the encampment, and the University of California workers eventually went on strike to defend their students. University of California workers have demonstrated how the labor movement can respond to attacks upon our democratic rights to speech and protest. We should take inspiration from this example in the struggles to come.

Why is the working class so strategically important in this question? Educators in the United States, you might say, have little direct impact on arms sales to Israel. Of course, not every worker is as directly tied to the production and distribution of arms as dockworkers, for example. But we know that our labor — as teachers, healthcare workers, logistics workers, and beyond — makes the world go around. We have the power to demand an end to military support for Israel, withholding our labor until our demands are met. That is why it is so crucial to strive for greater union democracy and fight back against every anti-worker law that tries to defang the labor movement, such as the Taylor Law here in NeYork that makes public sector strikes illegal. The example of the dockworkers in Greece who blocked ammunition to Israel, teachers in Los Angeles, NYSNA healthcare workers, and all those who are fighting in their unions and universities to oppose the U.S.-backed genocide, should serve as an inspiration. Alone, they may appear small, but together provide invaluable examples to workers around the world. Our class has the power to stop the genocide — and we need to do everything in our power to use it.




Emma Lee

Emma is a special education teacher in New York City.

 

Anarchism and the Labor Struggle Today

From Organise! Magazine UK by Elisha Moon Williams

When I first started my journey as an anarchist, I was incredibly privileged in both my environment and upbringing. I had grown up in a very upper-middle class suburb, neither knowing economic struggle nor of want when it came to my basic needs. I was, at that point in my life, a young 20 year old ‘man’ living with their parents as I started my doomed college career. That was when I got into the package industry.

Being a warehouse worker within the package industry was the most radicalizing job you could have given me. The sheer amount of naked disregard for safety and the well-being of myself and my co-workers only confirmed the anarchist inclinations that were forming from seeing police brutality against the George Floyd Uprisings. That Uprising was the first time that I, a white person living in the comfort of the suburbs, saw what the police really did to folks that didn’t look like me. However, it was on the warehouse floor that I truly understood what anarchists were talking about when it came to class struggle, white supremacy, and how the latter is used to suppress the former.

It was at that job that I read the anarchist books and zines that would become the cornerstone to how I saw the world and acted within it. It was at that job that I slowly realized my queer identity and adopted the name Elisha Moon Williams. It was at that job that I wrote down the rough outline that would become my first Anarchist Essay, Queers with Guns, in the small notebooks I carried around. Through this lens, I ended up attempting my first round of organization as an anarchist: collective labor struggle. Although I was unsuccessful in my attempt, it was an incredibly important part of my life. Without interacting with such a clear case of class struggle, I may not be the woman I am today.

This story demonstrates not only how important my involvement with class struggle was in my emergence as a queer anarchist, but also how impactful it was in gaining the skills necessary to organize projects later in life. For me, becoming an anarchist was not abstract and intellectual but instead related directly to the world around me and my actions within it. If more anarchists were active within the workplace, more people could have the same experience that I had when I was younger.

There has been an overall lack of focus within the broader anarchist community today on involvement in the labor struggle. There is often talk in online spaces of ‘joining a union,’ but very little in regards to actually organizing within your own workplace. Often times, this makes sense. Workplace organizing and collective worker action are both incredibly risky and not guaranteed to succeed. Not to mention this sort of organizing being directly connected to one’s livelihoods, and that even a successful campaign could contain the risk of organizing workers being illegally fired or reprimanded. In such an atomized and hyper-individualist society, it is more difficult to connect with your co-workers than ever before. These difficulties are real, and are not to be dismissed out of hand.

However, many of the more popular actions focused on by the current Anarchist movement are just as risky to one’s personal livelihoods, if not more so. The protesters’ peaceful actions to sabotage and prevent the building of ‘Cop City’ has given many of its participants RICO charges, including those that simply raised legal funds for their defense in court. Although some of the more extreme charges have been dropped at time of writing, the fundamental charges remain the same for many within that group. These charges give jail times that are comparable or even exceed that of murderers and sex criminals, permanently marking their records as felons if the charges stick. The police have often arrested and charged leaders of protests (both peaceful and not-so-peaceful) in order to break protests that ‘break curfew’ or even because they can.

Another objection that may be made is that organizing your workplace is too difficult these days. Some may argue that the workplace has changed more drastically than the old syndicalists of America and Europe could have ever dreamed of. It is true that the workplace and what a job even means has fundamentally shifted as the nature of the market itself has grown and shifted over the years. There’s an entire gig economy like Uber and Instacart where workers within the same company brand have no idea who their co-workers are, if the term ‘co-worker’ even applies at all. Many of the common workplaces that have remained have also been engineered by the bosses to reduce or eliminate workplace camaraderie which could get in the way of their bottom line by daring to exercise their fundamental labor rights, let alone the right to collective bargaining.

The package industry, An example within my experience, is designed to have many of its entry-level workers that do most of the heavy-lifting (literally) burned out and encouraged to either work up the ladder of management or quit. Most of the workers choose to quit, leaving the warehouse a constantly changing meat-grinder of manual laborers, disproportionately people of color, to do the dirty work without ever having to risk them advocating for themselves. Even if giving workers basic amenities that help them stay in the industry long enough to become competent at the job would give them better long-term profits, it doesn’t matter. All that matters is the short-term value that they are able to avoid losing by treating their workers as disposable machines. Many of the people that stay are those that move higher up the company ladder, separating them from the newer workers and lessening their chance at coming together in solidarity.

These difficulties put in place by the owning class are things that we as anarchists must overcome if we wish to ever grow beyond a small niche of idle intellectuals within the United States and Europe. There is a great opportunity being missed by the Anarchist movement from putting labor struggles on the back-burner. Although many workplaces have changed quite significantly since the hey-day of the labor anarchists, many of the same fundamental truths remain the same:

We have no control over when, where, or how we work. We are only employed for the profit of those that own for a living and often at our own expense. We work under threat of starvation and homelessness. We live under a dictatorship of the owning class every single day, and the workplace is an overt representation of that. It is up to us to agitate for both autonomy and dignity in the one life we know we have.

If there was much more emphasis on organizing our workplaces, many within the Anarchist movement would be able to learn the valuable skills that are needed for us to organize other aspects of our lives. The skill of effectively talking to people outside of our own experience is crucial, something that labor organizing forces you to learn incredibly quickly. Meeting people where they are at is one of the key things that

We cannot let top-down, reformist organizations be the only active forces agitating workplace organizing in the United States. In my own home city of Saint Louis, the most active labor movement is the growing amount of unionized Starbucks stores. The biggest group of people involved in its animation weren’t anarchists, but instead the local chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America. The main thing such organizations do is take the radical and active rank-and-file workers that agitate for change and better working conditions and place their aggression, ingenuity and energy into forming the exact same kinds of unions that are responsible for their own decline within American society. Unions that are intensely hierarchical, while being used as pressure-valves for the workers’ frustration and anguish without ever challenging the fundamental relationship between worker and owner. Unfortunately, Starbucks Workers’ United seems to have become that exact sort of union. Within my own experience, its upper management only approved performative one-day ‘Unfair Labor Practice Strikes,’ that ultimately never truly threatened the company of Starbucks’ profits. The union itself and how strike funds are doled out are purely run by the national organization and decided by its Board of Directors at the end of the day. Although the national union finally has the Starbucks Corporation at the bargaining table, such a goal could have easily been reached sooner if more firm economic pressure was placed upon the coffee giant. We need to be fighting for something greater than that, as anarchists. We need to advocate for the workers to represent themselves in organizations made by and for themselves and their own interests.

If we truly wish to connect with other working class folks, then we must be actively involved in agitating against some of the most authoritarian systems in their daily lives. Otherwise, they will remain trapped in the merry-go-round of trying to reform a society fundamentally based on violence and domination. The systems that dominate all of us will only continue to perpetuate themselves. We as anarchists must make the active decision to focus on labor struggles in our own neighborhoods. The future of our communities depend on it.

Elisha Moon Williams

Elisha (She/Her) is a Queer Especifist Anarchist living in St. Louis, Missouri, United States. More of her work can be found at medium.com/@elisha1542 or on the Anarchist Library.

Whoever Wins, the Labor Movement Must Break Free From the Two Capitalist Parties


No matter who wins the elections this year, the labor movement needs to break free from both capitalist parties and prepare to fight attacks from the far right and both parties by using our strategic positions as workers.


Olivia Wood 
November 4, 2024
LEFT  VOICE USA

Jason Bergman/SipaUSA/AP

On the first night of the 2024 Democratic National Convention (DNC), the party’s attempts to appeal to organized labor were on full display. The presidents of AFSCME, SEIU, LiUNA, IBEW, CWA, and the AFL-CIO all spoke briefly in support of Kamala Harris’s presidential bid during a joint speaking slot, and UAW president Shawn Fain gave extended remarks later in the program.

Fain gained national fame during the joint “stand up” strikes against Ford, GM, and Stellantis in 2023, and he represents a more progressive and class struggle-oriented sector within UAW. During his speech, he decried the “billionaire class” and its attempts to divide and conquer the working class by blaming economic problems on people of color, LGBTQ+ people, and immigrants. As an example of ruling-class greed, he called out Cornell University (whose service staff, organized with the UAW, had begun a strike earlier that day), and drew raucous applause when he took off his jacket to reveal a “Donald Trump is a scab” T-shirt. But all these correct critiques of bourgeois tactics and Republican rhetoric were used not to build or wield working-class power, but instead to express organized labor’s support for a Kamala Harris presidency and encourage UAW members to stay in the fold of the Democratic Party.

Fain claimed that Harris is “one of us” and a “fighter for the working class,” that she will “stand with the working class in our fight for justice.” But this is plainly untrue; while the Democrats’ program for workers has important differences from the Republicans’, they are still ultimately a bourgeois party, one that takes a different approach from that of the Republicans to manage class antagonisms in order to contain class struggle in favor of the bourgeoisie.

Meanwhile, the sector of the new Far Right that Trump and J. D. Vance represent has gained in strength in recent years. The former president has a slight edge in the polls, and Republicans are poised to take over the Senate and possibly keep the House of Representatives. Their program includes serious attacks against immigrants, workers, women, LGBTQ+ people, people of color, and climate change initiatives.

No matter who wins the elections this year, the labor movement needs to break free from both capitalist parties and prepare to fight attacks from both parties of capital using our strategic positions as workers.
Harris, Walz, and the Working Class

To see the futility of organized labor’s alliance with the Democratic Party, we need only look at who else is taking the stage at the DNC: Chicago mayor Brandon Johnson, Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass, and several Democratic governors, all of whom are the ultimate bosses of public sector workers in their cities and states. J. B. Pritzker, the governor of Illinois, even bragged about his own status as an “actual billionaire” during his convention speech on Tuesday. These are the mayors and governors (including Tim Walz) who set the police and National Guard against protesters, who oversee the destruction of the tents and belongings of people living on the street, and who approve the austerity budgets that defund public services and force public sector workers into ever-more difficult working conditions.

Biden came to power with big promises to the working class, promising to be the most pro-labor president since Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR). While Biden’s NLRB appointees have issued more progressive rulings than previous administrations, the Biden administration nonetheless broke the 2022 rail workers’ strike and intervened in the 2024 East Coast longshoremen’s strike to prevent disruptions to the economy. While some have praised the administration for refusing to invoke the Taft-Hartley Act to suspend the strike and for urging companies to offer their workers more, the real value of stopping the strike as quickly as possible is to protect the flow of capital and prevent the working class from seeing the extent of our power.

As the political situation stands now, the Harris/Walz campaign has created a Democratic Party with a “tent” big enough to include both labor movement superstar Shawn Fain and the much-loathed former Republican vice president Dick Cheney, who is famous for supporting war, torture, strengthened executive powers, and government surveillance. The Democratic Party, on many key issues such as immigration, is moving further to the right.

Just in the realm of education, the 2024 platform removed language present in the 2020 platform about providing LGBTQ-inclusive sex education; while the 2024 platform does discuss the problem of student debt, it doesn’t promise any further relief beyond what the Biden administration has already announced, which falls far short of the promises in the 2020 platform. The 2020 platform supports providing universal pre-K for three- and four-year-olds, while the 2024 platform only discusses four-year-olds. The 2020 platform calls for free tuition at all public colleges and universities for children of families making under $125,000 per year; the 2024 platform discusses free tuition only for community colleges and trade schools.

In a thread posted to the website commonly known as Twitter in August, the UAW praised Tim Walz, claiming that he “has always put the working class first.” But that’s untrue — in May 2023, Governor Walz sided with the Mayo Clinic over the Minnesota Nurses Association, agreeing to a carve-out that would exempt Mayo Clinic patients and nurses from a new safe staffing law.

Mary C. Turner, president of the Minnesota Nurses Association at the time, had this to say:


Nurses denounce Governor Tim Walz for his abdication of good government and acquiescence to anti-democratic and anti-labor corporate bullies. … By siding with the profits and power of corporate executives over the rights and needs of patients and workers, Governor Walz has made clear he will only side with labor when corporate interests concede.

As an individual and former teacher, Walz probably does understand and empathize with many workers’ issues. But as a Democratic politician, his personal goodwill is constrained by political expediency, because the Democratic Party is not a working-class party. It competes with the Republicans for working-class votes, but it is ultimately beholden to the bourgeoisie.

The Democratic Party is not moving to the left, as many people hoped it would given the popularity of Bernie Sanders and the Squad, the Black Lives Matter movement, and the Uncommitted Campaign. It is retreating on several of its own policy commitments — not only failing to achieve them during the Biden administration, but abandoning them as even stated goals. This is not a party that represents the interests of the working class and the oppressed, even though it continues to court these voters.
Election 2024 and the Fight for the Working Class

Amid the new trends toward greater militancy and new organizing in the US labor movement, such as how the pandemic and the 2020 resurgence of the Black Lives Matter movement have inspired new organizing, especially among young people, the 2024 campaign season has included significant attempts to appeal to the working class and organized labor in particular. Both in this year’s polls and in the past two presidential elections, Trump has gained ground among sectors of the working class (defined by pollsters in various ways).

This phenomenon is in part because the US working class is going through a process of political realignment. Jacobin’s summary of several studies on the phenomenon finds that the Democratic Party has “lost somewhere between 20 and 40 points of working-class support to Republicans or to abstention over the course of the past half-century,” and a debate about this “dealignment” in New Left Review notes that different segments of the working class are shifting in different directions (for instance, workers with higher levels of education and higher incomes are gradually becoming more Democratic, while workers with less education and lower incomes are gradually becoming more Republican). The Republican National Convention last month demonstrated the Republicans’ new overtures to workers, such as through appeals to economic populism, references to both “union and non-union workers,” and inviting Teamsters president Sean O’Brien to speak. The choice of J. D. Vance — known for his memoir Hillbilly Elegy — as the Republican pick for vice president also indicates the party’s attempt to appeal to the working class. While Project 2025 includes all kinds of anti-worker proposals, the policy handbook itself frames these proposals (including reducing overtime protections and strengthening independent contractor status) as pro-worker and pro-family, even though in reality they would make life significantly worse for workers and their families.

In short, Democrats and Republicans are fighting over working-class votes. Each party is attempting to present itself as having the solution to high inflation and the high cost of living, issues that most voters from both parties were “very concerned” about, according to a January Pew Research Center report. Because organized labor has historically aligned itself with the Democratic Party, Harris quickly locked down endorsements from many of the major national unions. At the DNC, the stage featured some of the union presidents in rapid succession, showing off their long-standing relationship with the Dems (and pointing out the Republicans’ relative lack of union support). This makes the argument that workers — and unionized workers in particular — should vote Democrat because the Democrats are their “allies.”

These appeals are especially important now in the context of Israel’s genocide in Gaza and anger from sectors of the labor movement over the United States’ funding and support for Israel. The UAW in particular has expressed support for its members taking part in divestment actions at college campuses, although the extent of that support has varied by location and has serious limitations, falling short of support for strike actions that exceed current labor law. But in the states where UAW members have been especially active in organizing for Palestine, most prominently in California (UAW 4811) and New York (especially graduate student unions at Columbia, New York University, and the New School), it’s Democratic politicians sending the police to arrest students, workers, and allies. In this context, the Democratic Party is also incentivized to strengthen its relationships with labor in order to temper labor’s organizing against the Democratic Party. By pulling segments of organized labor closer, the Democrats can strengthen their chances of winning elections in November while also smoothing over tensions and criticisms.

As one example, Fain’s T-shirt doesn’t just say “Trump is a scab” — it also says “Vote Harris.” Instead of directly fighting for the interests of their members and the working class as a whole, Fain and the other union presidents who spoke at the DNC are subordinating these interests to the interests of the Democratic Party.

On July 22, the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) became the first international union to endorse Harris for president. Biden’s withdrawal from the race happened to coincide with the AFT’s biennial convention, at which the union had already planned to vote on a presidential endorsement, and the planned resolution was amended for the new presumptive nominee. In her address to the AFT convention on July 25, Harris thanked AFT president Randi Weingarten for her “long-standing friendship” and for “serving as an adviser to the president and me.” Weingarten spoke on the final night of the DNC, on the same stage as some of the Democratic mayors, governors, and legislators who control funding for the schools that AFT members work in. Where I live, in New York, Democrats control the governorship and both houses of the legislature, but our universities — staffed by AFT members — are continually underfunded. Our buildings are perpetually falling apart, and most workers make less than a living wage.

Trading political support for Democratic officials in exchange for (possible) favorable treatment is a common strategy within the labor movement, dating back, as Mike Davis describes in Prisoners of the American Dream: Politics and Economy in the History of the U.S. Working Class, to the days of FDR and the New Deal coalition. In my own union, the Professional Staff Congress (PSC-CUNY), which is affiliated with the AFT, several people strongly argued in discussions around whom to endorse in the 2021 Democratic primary for the mayor of New York City that we should endorse based on who we thought was most likely to win rather than whose mayoral platform we supported the most or who would be most likely to give more funding to the City University of New York. In internal political discussions — especially about Palestine, but about other political issues as well — we are frequently told that it would be politically disadvantageous for us to come out in support of Palestinians or in opposition to the Israeli genocide in Gaza because we would risk alienating our legislative “allies” in city council and the state legislature, and thereby risk getting less funding for the university than we might otherwise have won.

The result of this strategy is that labor is compelled to constrain itself according to its so-called allies’ political wishes, in exchange for merely hoping for something in return. In this devil’s bargain, unions limit their own political activity, the possibilities that members might organize for, and the tactics they might use.

Of the unions whose presidents spoke at the Democratic National Convention, two of them (SEIU and UAW) also signed onto a July 23 letter demanding that the Biden administration halt all military aid to Israel. Given that Harris supports continuing weapons shipments to Israel and ensuring that the US military is the “most lethal fighting force in the world” if she is elected president, there is a clear contradiction between the unions’ political demands and their support of Harris’s candidacy.

PSC-CUNY has endorsed a presidential candidate only twice this century, endorsing John Kerry in 2004 and Bernie Sanders in 2020, with a clause in the latter resolution specifying that the union would support whoever won the Democratic nomination in the general election. The Kerry endorsement resolution specifies that the PSC was offering only critical support to Kerry, in contrast with the AFT’s uncritical endorsement passed at the convention, noting that “John Kerry’s presidential election campaign has taken positions at odds with the stated positions of the PSC on such issues as Iraq, labor policy, NAFTA, and educational policy.”

Much of the rest of the 2004 resolution’s text is dedicated to anti-war policy, including reaffirming the PSC’s “commitment to building labor participation in an independent anti-war movement and to maintain pressure on any presidential candidate or president to shift his position on this and other key issues.” In that clause from 2004, we at least see lip service to political independence, and labor participation in the anti-war movement, in contrast with the PSC leadership’s strong opposition to organizing in the movement against the genocide in Gaza. Neither the PSC as an institution nor its leaders has offered any qualifying statement about the AFT’s Harris endorsement, and the union’s social media accounts are instead celebrating the Harris campaign, even though Harris also holds several policy positions at odds with the official political positions of the PSC. For instance, she opposes Medicare for All, defunding the police, and certain provisions of the Green New Deal, all of which the PSC officially supports. Is that the program of a “champion for the working class?” No.

In contrast with this total lack of criticism from the AFT and many (but not all) of its locals, the United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America (UE) General Executive Board issued a statement on September 13 that offers political support for Harris while acknowledging that “a true political alternative, a labor party that can unite and speak for the working class,” would be better and that “in the long run, merely voting for the lesser of two evils is incapable of producing any kind of positive good for working people.” Even though the UE’s statement does not resolve the contradiction between the logic of lesser evilism while recommending a lesser evil vote, this example highlights just how deep in the Democrats’ pocket unions like the AFT are, in their refusal to make even minor criticisms of the Harris/Walz campaign. It also reveals the horizon that the US labor movement, including more progressive unions like UE, is currently unwilling to approach: actually organizing independently of the Democrats.

But instead of cutting ties and building a party that will actually represent our interests, the leaderships of the US labor movement continues to follow in the Democratic Party’s footsteps, with little in return. Instead of spending time and money organizing for Harris, the labor movement could dedicate itself to building its forces for fighting on behalf of workers and oppressed people regardless of who wins. The International Longshoremen’s Association won annual raises of over 10 percent for six years by shutting down East Coast ports for only three days — a strong sign of their power. If Trump wins — and especially if Republicans take control of Congress — there will undoubtedly be new attacks on our rights and new austerity measures imposed from the federal level. If Harris wins, there may still be new attacks and new austerity measures, but there will certainly be all of the same problems we have now under Biden: our government is funding a genocide; the federal minimum wage remains at $7.25 an hour while people struggle to make ends meet even in places with higher minimums; trans rights are highly restricted in more than half the country; many states have imposed abortion bans; police departments across the United States continue to brutalize people and are building new “Cop Cities” — and these are only some of the many serious problems facing everyday people.

Our work is cut out for us — and we need to spend our time preparing for what is to come rather than funneling our time, money, and energy into a political party that does not represent our interests.




Olivia Wood

Olivia is a writer and editor at Left Voice and lecturer in English at the City University of New York (CUNY).