Thursday, June 12, 2025

WWIII
US orders personnel out of 'dangerous' Middle East as Iran tensions escalate

President Donald Trump said on Wednesday the US was relocating personnel from the potentially "dangerous" Middle East as nuclear talks with Iran stalled, raising conflict fears. He vowed to prevent an Iranian nuclear weapon amid speculation of Israeli strikes as Tehran threatened to target US bases if conflict breaks out.


Issued on: 12/06/2025 - 
By: FRANCE 24
Video by: Fraser JACKSON

01:38
US Black Hawk helicopters escort Secretary of State Antony Blinken as they fly over Baghdad towards the US embassy headquarters on December 13, 2024. © Andrew Caballero-Reynolds, AFP


President Donald Trump said US personnel were being moved from the potentially "dangerous" Middle East on Wednesday as nuclear talks with Iran faltered and fears grew of a regional conflict.

Trump also reiterated that he would not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon, amid mounting speculation that Israel could strike Tehran's facilities.

Iran threatened Wednesday to target US military bases in the region if conflict breaks out.

A US official had earlier said that staff levels at the embassy in Iraq were being reduced over security concerns, while there were reports that personnel were also being moved from Kuwait and Bahrain.

"Well they are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place," Trump told reporters in Washington when asked about the reports of personnel being moved.

"We've given notice to move out and we'll see what happens."

Trump then added: "They can't have a nuclear weapon, very simple. We're not going to allow that."

Tehran and Washington have held five rounds of talks since April to thrash out a new nuclear deal to replace the 2015 accord that Trump abandoned during his first term in 2018.


US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff plans to meet Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in Oman on Sunday and discuss Iran's response to a recent American proposal for a nuclear deal, a US official said late on Wednesday.

Trump told a podcast on Monday he was less confident that Iran will agree to stop uranium enrichment in a nuclear deal with Washington.

Since returning to office in January, Trump has revived his "maximum pressure" campaign on Tehran, backing nuclear diplomacy but warning of military action if it fails.

The US president says he has pressed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to hold off striking Iran's nuclear facilities to give the talks a chance, but has increasingly signaled that he is losing patience.

Iran however warned it would respond to any attack.

"All its bases are within our reach, we have access to them, and without hesitation we will target all of them in the host countries," Iran's Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said in response to US threats of military action if the talks fail.

02:10
Iran’s top diplomat Abbas Araghchi in Tehran on February, 25, 2025. © Atta Kenare, AFP/File picture

'Suffer more losses'

"God willing, things won't reach that point, and the talks will succeed," the minister said, adding that the US side "will suffer more losses" if it came to conflict.

The United States has multiple bases in the Middle East, with the largest located in Qatar.

In January 2020, Iran fired missiles at bases in Iraq housing American troops in retaliation for the US strike that killed top Iranian general Qassem Soleimani days before at the Baghdad airport.

Dozens of US soldiers suffered traumatic brain injuries.

Amid the escalating tensions, the UK Maritime Trade Operations, run by the British navy, also advised ships to transit the Gulf with caution.

Read moreIran’s economic struggles: Can nuclear talks with US spark a turnaround?

Iran and the United States have recently been locked in a diplomatic standoff over Iran's uranium enrichment, with Tehran defending it as a "non-negotiable" right and Washington calling it a "red line".

Iran currently enriches uranium to 60 percent, far above the 3.67-percent limit set in the 2015 deal and close though still short of the 90 percent needed for a nuclear warhead.

Western countries have long accused Iran of seeking to acquire atomic weapons, while Tehran insists its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.

Last week, Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said enrichment is "key" to Iran's nuclear program and that Washington "cannot have a say" on the issue.

During an interview with the New York Post's podcast "Pod Force One," which was recorded on Monday, Trump said he was losing hope a deal could be reached.

"I don't know. I did think so, and I'm getting more and more – less confident about it. They seem to be delaying and I think that's a shame. I am less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago," he said.

Iran has said it will present a counter-proposal to the latest draft from Washington, which it had criticised for failing to offer relief from sanctions – a key demand for Tehran, which has been reeling under their weight for years.

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)

Exclusive: Houthis Warn US and Israel of 'War' If Iran Attacked

Published Jun 11, 2025 
By Tom O'Connor
Senior Writer, Foreign Policy & Deputy Editor, National Security and Foreign Policy
Newsweek Is A Trust Project Member

A source within the Ansar Allah movement, also known as the Houthis, has shared with Newsweek a warning to Israel and the United States amid reports of a potential Israeli attack being planned against Iran.

Reports Wednesday of U.S. nonessential personnel and family members being evacuated from regional countries, including Iraq, Bahrain and Kuwait, were followed by a Washington Post article citing unnamed officials indicating that the moves were being undertaken in anticipation of an imminent Israeli strike against Iran.

Israel's Channel 14 news outlet also reported that the country was preparing to soon launch a major operation against Iran.

The soaring tensions follow an Israeli naval strike conducted Tuesday against Ansar Allah, a member of the Iran-led Axis of Resistance coalition that has been engaged in missile and drone attacks against Israel since the outbreak of the war between Israel and the Palestinian Hamas movement in October 2023.

Reacting to the reports, an Ansar Allah source told Newsweek that the group had adopted a heightened state of readiness as it was already "essentially in a state of war with the Zionist enemy entity due to its aggression and siege on Gaza, followed by its aggression against Yemen."

"In this regard, we are in a state of constant readiness and are working to escalate our operations against the usurping entity, against the backdrop of the escalating massacres in Gaza and the worsening humanitarian situation there," the Ansar Allah source said.

The Ansar Allah source also issued a warning to the U.S. should it pursue actions targeting the group or its Iranian ally.

"We are also at the highest level of preparedness for any possible American escalation against us," the Ansar Allah source said. "Any escalation against the Islamic Republic of Iran is also dangerous and will drag the entire region into the abyss of war."

"America has no right to attack the countries of our community and our region in service of the Zionist enemy entity, which is considered the primary security threat to the region," the source added. "It is certainly not in the interest of the American people to become involved in a new war in service of the Zionist entity."

Reached for comment, a U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) spokesperson referred Newsweek to the Pentagon press office, which did not immediately respond.

Newsweek has also reached out to the Iranian Mission to the United Nations and the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) for comment.

Read more Iran
Ansar Allah fighters take part in a mass protest held against the Israeli continued bombardment and blockade of the Gaza Strip on May 23 in Sana'a, Yemen. Mohammed Hamoud/Getty Images

Between Diplomacy and War

The developments come amid new uncertainties surrounding ongoing nuclear negotiations between Washington and Tehran, which were set to enter their sixth round in Oman on Sunday.

Iranian officials were expected to counter an existing U.S. offer at the meeting, with Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei calling the current terms "unacceptable" on Monday.

That same day, President Donald Trump indicated that Iran's response thus far had been "not acceptable," with the alternative being "very, very dire." He also told the "Pod Force One" podcast on Monday that he was becoming "less confident" in the likelihood of reaching a successful deal.

Yet sources cited by Axios and CNN indicated that Trump had once again discouraged Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu from taking military action against Iran when they spoke on Monday. Trump has indicated on at least two previous occasions that he had called on the Israeli premier not to conduct attacks on Iran while negotiations were ongoing.

On Tuesday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi struck a more positive note regarding nuclear talks, saying that Trump's repeated vow to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon "is actually in line with our own doctrine and could become the main foundation for a deal."

"As we resume talks on Sunday, it is clear that an agreement that can ensure the continued peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear program is within reach—and could be achieved rapidly," Araghchi, who is leading the Iranian delegation at the talks, said in a statement published to X, formerly Twitter.

"That mutually beneficial outcome relies on the continuation of Iran's enrichment program, under the full supervision of the IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency], and the effective termination of sanctions," he added.

The statement came as the Iranian Intelligence Ministry threatened to release a trove of documents purported to be tied to Israel's own nuclear weapons, an arsenal that Israeli officials have for decades neither confirmed nor denied possessing. Iran's Supreme National Security Council stated that the sites detailed in the documents would be targeted in the event that Iran's nuclear infrastructure was subject to attack.

On Wednesday, Iranian Defense Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh warned U.S. military positions would also be hit in the event of a preemptive strike.

"Some officials on the other side threaten conflict if negotiations don't come to fruition," Nasirzadeh said, as cited by Reuters. "If a conflict is imposed on us ... all U.S. bases are within our reach, and we will boldly target them in host countries."

Hours later, CBS News reported that U.S. officials had been informed Israel was fully prepared to launch a strike against Iran and that retaliation was expected to potentially target the U.S. presence in Iraq, prompting the partial evacuation of the embassy in Baghdad.

"On June 11, the U.S. Department of State ordered the departure of non-emergency U.S. government personnel from Iraq," the U.S. Embassy in Iraq said in a statement Wednesday.

The U.S. Footprint in the Middle East

The U.S. is estimated to host around 2,500 troops in Iraq tasked with advising and training Iraqi forces in the fight against the Islamic State militant group (ISIS). While ISIS is a common foe of both Washington and Tehran, the U.S. presence in the country has been viewed as a threat by Iran.

Iran previously targeted U.S. troops in January 2020 following the assassination of top Iranian military figure Major General Qassem Soleimani. His killing was ordered by Trump in response to clashes between U.S. forces and Iraqi militias aligned with Tehran's Axis of Resistance.

Trump's predecessor, President Joe Biden, announced last September a two-phase plan to begin pulling U.S. military personnel from Iraq though the current administration has yet to confirm its commitment to the initiative.

Militias aligned to the Islamic Resistance in Iraq have repeatedly threatened to renew strikes against U.S. personnel if Washington and Baghdad failed to produce a concrete timeline to ensure the departure of U.S. forces.

The U.S. also hosts a number of key bases and facilities elsewhere in the region, particularly in Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. As Biden signaled a gradual drawdown of U.S. troops in Iraq, he also increased the number of personnel in the broader CENTCOM area of operations from 34,000 to around 43,000, the Associated Press reported at the time.
The Houthi Threat

U.S. forces in the region have conducted direct strikes against Ansar Allah in response to its attacks on Israel as well as an unprecedented campaign that U.S. officials say targeted both civilian vessels and U.S. military vessels on hundreds of occasions between October 2023 and last month, when Trump announced a surprise deal with the group.

The U.S. leader said that Ansar Allah had agreed to suspend its maritime campaign in exchange for a halt to U.S. operations targeting the group. The deal notably did not include a pause to Ansar Allah's missile and drone strikes against Israel, which resumed in March after the breakdown of a ceasefire reached between Israel and Hamas in January.

Ansar Allah has pressed on with these long-range attacks against Israel, most recently launching a ballistic missile Wednesday just hours after the Israeli Navy targeted Yemen's Al-Hodeidah port in response to earlier strikes from the group.

The group has emerged as the most active member of the Axis of Resistance since the Lebanese Hezbollah movement signed a ceasefire with Israel last November, the collapse of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's government to an Islamist-led rebel coalition less than two weeks later and a lull in attacks by the Islamic Resistance in Iraq following the initial Gaza truce reached in January.

Led by Abdul-Malek al-Houthi, Ansar Allah seized the Yemeni capital from the nation's a decade ago and today controls around a third of the country's territory and up to 80 percent of its population. Hostilities between the group and Yemen's Saudi-backed internationally recognized government have largely ceased since a truce mediated by the United Nations in April 2022.

To this day, the group denies receiving direct support from Iran.



'It’s more serious than any other time in the past': Israel poised to strike Iran, officials say

US officials warn nuclear talks may collapse; Trump envoy Witkoff says president called him 5 times; embassies in Mideast, Europe, Africa activate emergency teams; Trump says US military 'will summon inexhaustible courage'
Yesterday | YNET

The United States is on heightened alert amid growing fears of a potential Israeli military strike on Iran, the Washington Post reported late Wednesday, as nuclear negotiations between Washington and Tehran appear to be unraveling

The report follows a series of security moves, including U.S. orders for non-essential staff to leave its embassies in Iraq, Bahrain and Kuwait, and emergency preparations at embassies across the Middle East, Eastern Europe and North Africa.


Ali Khamenei, Benjamin Netanyahu, Donald Trump
(Photo: REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein, Iranian Leader's Press Office - Handout/Getty Images, GPO, IDF)

The Post said the U.S. State Department instructed all embassies within potential Iranian missile range to activate emergency response teams and assess how best to protect personnel amid escalating regional threats. President Donald Trump, asked why some U.S. military personnel in the region were ordered to prepare for evacuation, responded cryptically: “We’ll see what happens.”

The paper further reported that the next round of nuclear talks, scheduled for this Sunday in Muscat, Oman, may be at risk of cancellation. However, a U.S. administration official told Reuters that President Trump’s envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, is still expected to meet with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Sunday. Witkoff attended an event in New York on Wednesday night but was later summoned to the White House by Trump, telling associates that the president personally called him no fewer than five times.

Trump, who in recent days has expressed growing skepticism about the prospects for a new agreement with Iran, reiterated his support for the U.S. military in a post on Truth Social. “I am more confident than ever that in the days ahead and every generation to come, the U.S. Army will heap glory upon glory," he wrote. "You will summon inexhaustible courage. You will protect every inch of U.S. soil—and you will defend America to the ends of the earth!

The New York Times attributed the rising tensions to a breakdown in nuclear negotiations, particularly over uranium enrichment. The U.S. insists Iran must end all enrichment capabilities, while Tehran has repeatedly stated it will not surrender the right to enrich uranium on its own soil.



Late Wednesday, CBS News added to the sense of urgency, reporting that U.S. officials had been briefed that Israel has completed preparations to launch an attack on Iran. The report also said Washington fears that such a move could prompt retaliatory strikes by Iran on American targets in neighboring Iraq—one reason behind the current drawdown of U.S. presence in the region.

“We are watching and worried,” one senior diplomat in the region told the Post. “We think it’s more serious than any other time in the past.”

Iran, for its part, continued to call for a negotiated solution, with its mission to the United Nations reiterating that “diplomacy—not militarism—is the only path forward.”

Speaking at a gala for United Hatzalah in New York, Witkoff confirmed he had spoken the night before with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Witkoff said the U.S. must never allow Iran to enrich uranium or develop nuclear capabilities. “A nuclear Iran represents an existential threat to Israel, as does an Iran with a large amount of missiles. That is as big an existential threat as the nuclear threat. And this is an existential threat to the United States and the free world and the entire GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council). We must stand resolute and united against this danger and ensure that Iran never attains the means to achieve its deadly ambitions, no matter what the cost,” he warned.


Steve Witkoff, Abbas Araghchi
(Photo: REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/Pool, Amer HILABI AFP, CameraObscura82/Shutterstock, Smolkov Vladislav/Shutterstock)

He also praised Trump, calling him “the only U.S. president who could also serve as Israel’s prime minister—no disrespect to Prime Minister Netanyahu.”
Adding to concerns, Reuters revealed late Wednesday that CENTCOM Commander Gen. Michael Kurilla had postponed his scheduled testimony before Congress due to the unfolding situation in the Middle East. In the wake of these developments, global oil prices jumped by roughly 5%.

The precautionary U.S. moves followed renewed threats from Tehran. Iranian Defense Minister Gen. Aziz Nasirzadeh warned that if diplomacy fails and conflict is "forced" upon Iran, the country would strike U.S. bases in the region. “The losses of the enemy would outweigh ours,” he said. “In the event of confrontation, America must leave the region, as all its bases are within our reach—we will not hesitate to target them.”

 Nasirzadeh also claimed Iran had recently tested a missile with a two-ton warhead.
A U.S. official said the State Department would instruct Baghdad embassy staff to leave via commercial flights but noted the U.S. military is ready to assist if needed. An Iraqi Foreign Ministry source confirmed a "partial evacuation" of the U.S. embassy in Baghdad due to "regional security concerns."


US President Donald Trump
(Photo: REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein, AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

Amid the rising rhetoric, Iran’s mission to the United Nations released a statement
 warning that threats of “overwhelming force” would not change the reality. “Iran is not seeking a nuclear weapon, and U.S. militarism only fuels instability,” the statement read, accusing CENTCOM of enabling Israeli actions and undermining diplomatic efforts.

Meanwhile, The New York Times reported overnight that senior Iranian military and government officials have already convened to discuss their potential response to an Israeli strike. According to a high-ranking Iranian government source, Tehran has devised a retaliatory plan that would involve an “immediate counterstrike on Israel with hundreds of ballistic missiles.”

In a separate report by Al Arabiya English, sources said U.S. intelligence assessments indicate that Iranian-backed militias operating in Iraq and other regional hotspots are preparing to target American interests across the Middle East.

Earlier in the evening, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian accused foreign enemies of trying to provoke internal conflict to justify an attack. “We are in contact with the U.S. and Europe, but we will not surrender to dictates,” he said. “No one has the right to deny our scientific research in nuclear technology. We do not seek nuclear arms, but we won’t strip our capabilities so Israel can bomb us freely.”


Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian
(Photo: Atta KENARE / AFP)

As nuclear negotiations between Washington and Tehran teeter on the brink of collapse, American officials have issued fresh warnings that failure could trigger a military response. Since April, five rounds of negotiations have taken place as talks appear to have stalled over a fundamental impasse: uranium enrichment. The U.S. insists any future deal must eliminate Iran’s capacity to enrich uranium—a process that, even at low levels, could eventually provide a pathway to a bomb. Iran, meanwhile, has repeatedly stated that enrichment on its own soil is a non-negotiable red line.

Defense Secretary Hegseth told Senate lawmakers on Wednesday that “there have been plenty of indications” Iran has been “moving their way toward something that would look a lot like a nuclear weapon.”

Meanwhile, President Trump expressed growing doubt about the prospects of reaching a deal to dismantle Iran’s nuclear program. “I don’t know,” Trump told the New York Post podcast when asked whether he still believed an agreement was possible. “I did think so, and I'm getting more and more less confident about it."

Trump voiced hope that Iran would shift course and choose diplomacy over confrontation. “They're not going to have a nuclear weapon. But it would be nicer to do it without warfare, without people dying, it's so much nicer to do it,” he said. “But I don't think I see the same level of enthusiasm for them to make a deal. I think they’re making a mistake, but we’ll see. I guess time will tell.”


US vessels in the Strait of Hormuz

The comments mark a stark shift in tone from the White House, which had previously projected optimism about the negotiations. As recently as this week, Trump said he was “disappointed” by Iran’s increasingly aggressive stance and accused Tehran of backtracking on earlier positions.

His pessimism comes amid mounting pressure from Israel to abandon talks altogether. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly urged Trump during a phone call on Monday to recognize that Iran was “stringing him along.” Still, sources say Trump is holding back from approving an Israeli military strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities. During their conversation, he is said to have told Netanyahu explicitly that he is not giving Israel a “green light” for such an operation.




Filipino families flee Northern Irish home after night of anti-immigrant violence


From left: Michael Asuro, 26, Michael Sancio, 27, Mariel Lei Odi, 27, and Jessa Sagarit 26, whose house was attacked last night and who were evacuated by Ballymena Baptist Church, now living in a caravan, sit on a couch in Cullybackey near Ballymena, following riots in Ballymena, Northern Ireland, on June 11.
PHOTO: Reuters

ASIA ONE
June 11, 2025 


BALLYMENA, Northern Ireland — Michael Sancio, a resident of the Northern Irish town of Ballymena, said he was woken at midnight on Tuesday (June 10) by masked men banging loudly on windows.

Sancio, his wife and daughter, and a couple who share their house — all originally from the Philippines — grabbed their passports and a few belongings and fled their home, sleeping at a friend's house on Tuesday night. They said they plan to stay further outside the town on Wednesday because they feel unsafe at home.

Hundreds of masked rioters attacked police and set homes and cars on fire in the town of 30,000 people for a second successive night on Tuesday. Police are investigating the damaging of property as racially-motivated "hate crimes".

"Last night I woke up at 12 midnight because I heard some people outside, and I saw in the window, I saw the other guys wearing a black jacket and black pants, and also they're wearing a mask," Sancio, 27, told Reuters on Wednesday.

Michael Sancio (left), 27, and Mariel Lei Odi (right), 27, whose house was attacked last night and who were evacuated by Ballymena Baptist Church, now living in a caravan, sit on a couch in Cullybackey near Ballymena, following riots in Ballymena, Northern Ireland, on June 11.
PHOTO: Reuters

"They started banging the window of our neighbours so I panicked because I have a daughter inside that house."

The rioters smashed the windows of the couple's car that was parked outside the house and set it and a bin on fire, said Sancio, who works at a local bus manufacturer.


The violence erupted after two 14-year-old boys were arrested and appeared in court, accused of a serious sexual assault on a teenage girl in Ballymena, a town with a relatively large migrant population located 28 miles (45km) from Belfast.

The charges were read via a Romanian interpreter to the boys, the BBC reported, adding that the lawyer told the court that they denied the charges.

Anti-migrant violence is rare in Northern Ireland, which for decades has been more familiar with sectarian violence between resident Catholics and Protestants, including in Ballymena.

While a 1998 peace deal largely ended the three decades of bloodshed between Protestants who want to remain under British rule and Catholics favouring a united Ireland, there are still sporadic clashes.
'Extreme fear'

Sancio said the masked men told them that they were not targeting Filipino people.

Around Ballymena, Filipino residents put stickers of British and Filipino flags on their doors, with messages saying "Filipino lives here" to show they were not Romanian.

Union Jack flags regularly fly in the largely pro-British town. Democratic Unionist Party councillor Lawrie Philpott told Reuters that some people who usually don't fly flags had hung Union Jacks outside their homes this week to show they are local.

Around 6 per cent of people in Northern Ireland were born abroad, according to government statistics. The foreign-born population in Ballymena is higher, in line with the UK average of 16 per cent, and includes a relatively large Filipino community.

Northern Ireland has been broadly welcoming to migrants but that has been tested recently. Violent disorder erupted in Belfast last August as part of anti-immigration protests that swept across several UK cities following the murder of three young girls in northwest England.


In the Republic of Ireland, rioting broke out in Dublin in late 2023 during anti-immigrant protests that were triggered by a stabbing attack that left a child seriously injured.

Sian Mulholland, a local lawmaker from the Alliance Party, said she was fielding calls from migrant families who in some cases had barricaded themselves into their homes until 2.30am (9.30am in Singapore) on Wednesday morning.

"I had been engaging with this community beforehand because the houses they are living in are not fit for purpose. They're (living in) squalor," she told Reuters.

Sancio's wife, Mariel Lei Odi, was working a night shift on Tuesday. When she returned home, she was worried about the safety of their two-year-old daughter, she said.

"When I (came home to) my husband and chatted about what happened last night: (I said) 'my daughter, my daughter, my daughter. What happened?'," she said.

Mariel Lei Odi (left), 27, and Jessa Sagarit (right), 26, whose house was attacked last night and who were evacuated by Ballymena Baptist Church, now living in a caravan, sit on a couch in Cullybackey near Ballymena, following riots in Ballymena, Northern Ireland, on June 11.
PHOTO: Reuters

Michael Asuro, who lives in the house with his wife, Jessa Sagarit, said he came to Northern Ireland just under two years ago to seek a better life. Sagarit said she felt traumatised by the events.

Police have said they are braced for more violence on Wednesday.

As residents boarded up broken windows and doors in Ballymena, the Filipino families wondered about their future and whether they will stay.

"We feel extreme fear," Asuro said.
Troop deployment to Russia earns N. Korea $525 million annually

Most of the income comes in goods rather than cash, including oil, diesel, wheat flour, industrial parts and military technology


By Lee Sang-yong
- June 12, 2025
DAILYNK

The Rodong Sinmun newspaper reported March 7, 2024, that North Korean leader Kim Jong Un had paid a visit the previous day to critical operational and training bases of the Korean People’s Army on the western front and toured training facilities there. The photograph depicts North Korean soldiers doing exercises. (Rodong Sinmun, News 1)

North Korea earns an estimated $43.8 million monthly — or $525.6 million yearly — through its troop deployment to Russia. The country has made an additional $6 million when condolence payments for soldiers killed in action are included.

A high-ranking Daily NK source in North Korea reported recently that North Korean troops deployed to Russia receive graduated salaries based on their rank through an agreement with Moscow. Commanders receive $5,000 monthly, technical specialists earn $3,500, non-commissioned officers make $3,000, and ordinary enlisted men get $2,800.

South Korea’s National Intelligence Service (NIS) determined that North Korea has dispatched about 15,000 troops. The source says about 2% hold command rank, 8% are technical specialists, 10% are non-commissioned officers, and 80% are ordinary enlisted men.

Based on these calculations, North Korea’s total monthly income reaches about $43.8 million thanks to its troop deployment. The 300 commanders make around $1.5 million, the 1,200 technical specialists earn $4.2 million, the 1,500 non-commissioned officers make around $4.5 million, and the 12,000 ordinary enlisted men earn around $33.6 million.

When extrapolated for the year, North Korea makes about $525.6 million annually through its troop deployment to Russia alone.

Death benefits add to revenue stream


North Korea also receives $6,000 to $10,000 in condolence money from Russia for every North Korean soldier killed in action. In a recent report to South Korea’s National Assembly, the NIS estimated that about 600 North Korean troops have died in combat. Based on this figure, North Korea has received at least $3.6 million and at most $6 million in condolence payments.

“The government calculates the life of one of its soldiers at a few thousand dollars, and even the condolence payments paid to fallen soldiers become part of the state’s finances,” the source said. “The lives of the people are just a means, while war is just an industry to generate foreign currency.

“Instead, the government treats the families of the fallen like state heroes, giving them priority for food and re-allotting them homes,” the source continued. “While informing provincial, city and county officials of this compensation scheme, the authorities ordered that they keep the plan strictly secret until all the soldiers return home.”
Payment structure focuses on strategic goods

Most of the income comes in goods rather than cash, including oil, diesel, wheat flour, industrial parts and military technology. In the initial dispatch, some payments came in dollars, but now Russia is replacing dollar payments with strategic goods that can be exchanged for Russian rubles, Chinese yuan or other commodities. Some of the money has also gone toward repaying loans from the time of Kim Il Sung.

Goods that North Korea has secured from Russia are managed by the Financial 1.8 Funds Directorate under the party’s Munitions Industry Department. They invest these resources intensively in modernizing the military, research and development under the Missile General Bureau, and bolstering the defense distribution network.

North Korea has exported weaponry at the same time, with major exports including 122-152mm shells, missile warheads, small arms and ammunition, flares, portable air defense weapons, jamming equipment and wireless gear, the source said. The exports also include some experimental weapons.

Troop deployment used to bolster leader’s image

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un’s personal inspection of military factories on June 7 can be seen as the leadership pushing for increased exports while maintaining a wartime production posture. “Factories that post good export numbers receive foreign currency incentives while their workers receive class promotions,” the source said.

North Korea employs a multi-layered laundering structure in its transactions with Russia, including third-country front companies, transhipments on the high seas and false-name contracts. Trading companies attached to the Reconnaissance General Bureau, Missile General Bureau and Ministry of External Economic Relations participate in this with tacit Russian approval, the source said.

North Korea earns more than economic benefits from the deployment — it has also used the situation to bolster Kim Jong Un’s domestic image.

“The authorities are promoting the deployment as the supreme leader leading a just war in an anti-imperialist front in unity with Russia,” the source said. “He is bolstering the prestige of the Paektu bloodline as a leader carrying on the anti-imperialist pedigree of Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il.”


Is Trump’s America in the middle of a coup?

Years of covering power struggles and civil wars leads world affairs editor Sam Kiley to question whether Trump is intentionally taking the establishment apart on his own home turf



Thursday 12 June 2025
The Independent

In conducting a coup in an impoverished undeveloped nation there is a basic to-do list. You capture the presidency, the courts, take over the international airport, emasculate the legislature, decapitate the military of potential opponents, storm the local TV station and declare a new dawn.

Bigger countries require more effort, like the mass mobilization of xenophobia through false-flag attacks and terror scares, but from Moscow to Monrovia, the patterns are the same – an autocrat takes power in the name of national salvation.

With Donald Trump in power for a little over four months, questions are swirling as to whether this process is happening to what was the most powerful democracy on earth.


open image in galleryMembers of the California National Guard stand watch outside the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building (AFP/Getty)

When he refused to accept he lost the 2020 elections and his supporters stormed the Capitol, and later jailed, he pardoned them all. Now America's constitution is again under threat of what many critics are calling an internal coup d'etat. Driven, perhaps, because the president has openly considered a Trump 2028 campaign for a third, unconstitutional, term.

While he was duly elected to his office for a second time last November, every check and balance to the power of the US presidency as enumerated in the Constitution has been, or is being, challenged— a notion only heightened by the drumbeat of declarations from White House insiders of an “insurrection” in Los Angeles.

As protestors took to the streets against the mass arrest of alleged illegal immigrants, Trump lost little time in ordering 700 US Marines and thousands of National Guard onto the streets of Los Angeles.


open image in galleryPresident Trump speaks to reporters after arriving on Air Force One (AP)

Californian governor Gavin Newsom described the move as “deranged” which would only serve to inflame tensions on the west coast.


The governor declared: “Democracy is under assault. The moment we feared has arrived.

“Take time. Reflect on this perilous moment a president, bound by no law or constitution, perpetuating a unified assault on American traditions.”

His words came only hours after Trump warned anyone contemplating protesting during his military parade on June 14 that they would be met with “very heavy force”.


open image in galleryCalifornia Highway Patrol officers clash with protesters on Tuesday (AP)

Trump’s to-do list in taking on - and taking down - the establishment has already been largely ticked off.


First he moved against the military and intelligence services whom, during his first presidency, he blamed for holding back his agenda and for failing to back the “protesters” who invaded the US Capitol on January 6 2021.

Mark Milley, chairman of the joint chief of staff during Trump 1.0, lost his security detail and the pre-emptive pardon he’d been given by outgoing president Joe Biden after he was threatened with prosecution by Trump.


Trump then fired his successor Airforce general Charles Brown, and the head of the US Coastguards Linda Fagan. They were axed, the administration suggested, because they were DEI hires. Nothing in their backgrounds indicates they were anything but qualified for the top jobs, but the messaging was clear from the White House – we want our own people.


open image in galleryDemonstrators march during a protest in Los Angeles (AP)

But they must be loyal above all – so General Timothy Haugh, the head of the National Security Agency and US Cyber Command, has also gone along with the head of Naval operations admiral Lisa Franchetti. No reason was given for Haugh’s dismissal in April.

Trump told reporters on Air Force One at the time: “We're always going to let go of people – people we don't like or people that take advantage of, or people that may have loyalties to someone else.”

Moving on, the FBI boss Christopher Wray was replaced with Kash Patel, an avid Trump loyalist who has failed to produce a budget for his agency this year. The new deputy director Dan Bongino is a podcaster who peddled the lie that Trump won the 2020 presidential election.

The director of National Intelligence is now Tulsi Gabbard, who has been an apologist for Vladimir Putin and Syria’s Bashar al Assad. Pete Hegseth, a former Fox News contributor, is secretary of defence and famed for his attacks on Volodymyr Zelensky, Nato, and for using his personal phone to transmit state secrets.


open image in galleryGavin Newsom has criticised Donald Trump (Reuters)

Incompetence among cabinet members and top officials means that Trump knows they owe their place in his orbit to him alone. Each of these leaders have purged their own departments and replaced professionals with apparatchiks.

The federal bureaucracy has been hammered by Trump’s re-definition of more than 50,000 civil servants and “political hires”, allowing for him to impose pre-vetted loyalists in the executive heart of the government.

Opposition to a coup will often come from the judiciary and universities. Trump has moved to stifle both.

Top academies like Harvard and Colombia have been threatened with or have lost federal funding worth billions for pushing back at Trump’s attempts to control their intellectual life. Foreign students are being banned.

Students and academics who have supported Palestinian rights have been accused of backing terror groups like Hamas and fired, expelled or deported. The issue here is focussed on Israel and alleged antisemitism but again, the message is clear – free speech is over.

Of course, none of this could have been achieved without the active support of the US Congress and Senate which is supposed to check the worst of executive power. But with Republican majorities in both, Trump has been given a free rein.

And Republicans who do not subscribe to Trump’s vision in Congress are often living in fear of criticising him.


open image in galleryPeople walk past graffiti from recent protests against federal immigration raids in LA (AP)

Standout Republican opponent Alaskan Senator Lisa Murkowski said during a townhall last month: “We’re in a time and a place where I certainly have not been here before. I’m oftentimes very anxious myself about using my voice because retaliation is real…

“I have to figure out how to help the many and the anxious who are so afraid [in Congress]”.

Many academics from Africa in particular, who have lived through civil wars for the last 30 years, have wondered how long it would be before Americans realized they could be living through their own form of coup.

A professor at a prestigious east coast university who has a green card and is world renowned in their field said: “I’m just wary about being quoted. We (academics non-nationals) have even been told not to leave the US in case we can’t get back in. The administration is monitoring our social media accounts”.

Speaking anonymously for fear of retribution they went on: “Those of us who have grown up under authoritarian regimes have learned of the signs of incipient and growing authoritarianism. None of this is rocket science.

“There is a method: the control of the press and judiciary, co-option of the loyalty of the police and the army, rise of militias, manipulation of elections. Trump discredited the mainstream media, stacked the judiciary… He demanded the loyalty of the FBI.”


open image in galleryPeople walk through downtown Los Angeles following the lifting of an overnight curfew (Getty)

America’s judiciary has had patchy success in getting the administration to observe the constitution that the president, military, and intelligence services have sworn to uphold too. Trump’s White House has ignored orders to stay deportations.

In May, over 130 former state and federal judges demanded the government drop its charges against Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan, dubbing her indictment for allegedly helping man evade immigration officials as an “egregious overreach” by the executive branch.

But ICE immigration officials have spread across the country arresting suspects without showing identification, frequently without warrants, and using force to impose meet Trump’s mass deportation promises.


open image in galleryAn armoured vehicle drives passed a police line outside of the Metropolitan Detention Center on June 10 (Getty)

This week, Trump has been concerned with the manufactured notion of an “insurrection” in California. A conflict between protestors and the armed forces on the streets of LA could be the excuse any autocrat would use to declare a national emergency, and suspend constitutional law.

“The president is trying to manufacture chaos and crisis on the ground for his own political ends,” said Robert Bonta, California’s attorney general after announcing that the state, led by Mr Newsom, was going to sue the Trump administration for violating the US Constitution.


“Federalizing the California National Guard is an abuse of the president’s authority under the law – and not one we take lightly. We’re asking a court to put a stop to the unlawful, unprecedented order.”

With decades of experience in West Africa and having published widely on the war that tore Yugoslavia apart, the anonymous east coast professor added a dire warning: “I think, eventually, a state will consider seceding. Maybe California. Then it will be war, I think Yugoslavia is a good model for the US”.
Protests over Trump's immigration raids spread across the US

Protests against hardline immigration tactics spread across the US Wednesday after days of rallies in Los Angeles, as California geared for a legal battle over President Trump’s military deployment. More than 1,000 demonstrators marched peacefully in America’s second-largest city for a sixth straight day.


Issued on: 12/06/2025 -
By: FRANCE 24



Protests over hardline immigration tactics ignited across the United States Wednesday after days of demonstrations in Los Angeles, as California prepared for a legal showdown with the White House over Donald Trump's deployment of the military.

Over 1,000 people massed in America's second biggest city for a sixth day of protests, with the crowd peaceful as they marched through the streets.

A second night of curfew was expected as city leaders try to get a handle on the after-dark vandalism and looting that scarred a few city blocks in the 500-square-mile (1,300 square kilometres) metropolis.

"I would say for the most part everything is hunky dory right here at Ground Zero," protester Lynn Sturgis, 66, a retired school teacher, told AFP.


"Our city is not at all on fire, it's not burning down, as our terrible leader is trying to tell you."

Read more Marines in LA: Trump chooses strategy of escalation against anti-ICE protests

The mostly peaceful protests ignited over a sudden escalation in efforts to apprehend migrants who were in the country illegally.

Pockets of violence – including the burning of self-driving taxis and hurling stones at police – were nothing the 8,500 officers of the Los Angeles Police Department had not dealt with before.

Trump won the election last year partly on promises to combat what he claims is an "invasion" by undocumented migrants.

He is now seizing the opportunity to make political capital, ordering the California National Guard to deploy despite Governor Gavin Newsom's objections, the first time a US president has taken such action in decades.

"We're going to have a safe country," he told reporters on his way into a theater performance.

"We're not going to have what would have happened in Los Angeles. Remember, if I wasn't there ... Los Angeles would have been burning to the ground."

Around 1,000 of the 4,700 troops Trump deployed were actively guarding facilities and working alongside ICE agents, said Scott Sherman, Deputy Commanding General Army North, who is leading operations.

The rest – including 700 active duty Marines – were mustering or undergoing training to deal with civil disturbances, he said.

The Pentagon has said the deployment will cost taxpayers $134 million.

Governor Newsom, a Democrat, has charged that Trump is seeking to escalate the confrontation for political gain.

His lawyers were expected in court on Thursday to demand a temporary restraining order that would prevent troops from accompanying immigration officers as they arrest migrants.

Administration lawyers called the application a "crass political stunt".

Newsom said the unprecedented militarisation would creep beyond his state's borders.

"Democracy is under assault right before our eyes," he said Tuesday. "California may be first, but it clearly won't end here."

Read more


Nationwide protests growing

Despite Trump's threats to deploy the National Guard to other Democratic-run states over the objections of governors, protesters appear undeterred.

Demonstrations were reported in St Louis, Raleigh, Manhattan, Indianapolis and Denver.

In San Antonio, hundreds marched and chanted near city hall, reports said, where Republican Texas Governor Greg Abbott has deployed the state's National Guard.

A nationwide "No Kings" movement was expected on Saturday, when Trump will attend a highly unusual military parade in the US capital.

The parade, featuring warplanes and tanks, has been organised to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the founding of the US Army but also happens to be the day of Trump's 79th birthday.

01:22© France 24


'Inflamed' situation

The Trump administration is painting the protests as a violent threat to the nation, requiring military force to support regular immigration agents and police.

But Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said the crisis had been manufactured in Washington.

"A week ago, everything was peaceful in the city of Los Angeles," she told reporters.

"Things began to be difficult on Friday when raids took place ... that is the cause of the problems.

"This was provoked by the White House."

Arrests by masked and armed men continued Wednesday.

A pastor in the LA suburb of Downey said five armed men driving out-of-state cars grabbed a Spanish-speaking man in the church's parking lot.

When she challenged the men and asked for their badge numbers and names, they refused.

"They did point their rifle at me and said, 'You need to get back,'" Lopez told broadcaster KTLA.

Footage seen by AFP shows what appears to be federal agents ramming a car in the Boyle Heights area of Los Angeles.

Some kind of smoke device is deployed and masked men with assault weapons order a man from the car, leaving what witnesses said was his wife and children badly shaken.

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)

US: Protests Spread Nationwide Amid LA Mayors Urging Trump To Stop Raids; Pentagon Says $134M Cost In Guard Deployment

According to the Los Angeles police department, nearly 400 arrests and detentions have been made since Saturday, majority of whom were failing to leave the area at the request of law enforcement.


Trisha Majumder
Updated on: 12 June 2025 
OUTLOOK INDIA



Immigration protests in Los Angeles Photo: Ethan Swope/AP

The protests against President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown in Los Angeles have now spread across the United States of America, with thousands of people in cities including Dallas and Austin in Texas, and Chicago and New York, rallied and more arrests were made.

Several mayors from across the Los Angeles region have come together on Wednesday to demand that the Trump administration stop the stepped-up immigration raids that have spread fear across their cities and sparked protests across the US.

According to the Los Angeles police department, nearly 400 arrests and detentions have been made since Saturday, majority of whom were failing to leave the area at the request of law enforcement.

Pentagon On Cost Of National Guard Deployment

Trump has activated more than 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines over the objections of city and state leaders, though the Marines have not yet been spotted in Los Angeles and Guard troops have had limited engagement with protesters. They were originally deployed to protect federal buildings.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed on Tuesday that the use of troops inside the US will continue to expand.

The Pentagon said deploying the National Guard and Marines costs $134 million.

Hegseth said, “I think we’re entering another phase, especially under President Trump with his focus on the homeland, where the National Guard and Reserves become a critical component of how we secure that homeland,” during hearing before the House Appropriations defense subcommittee.

Protests Spread Across US

In New York City, police said they took 86 people into custody during protests in lower Manhattan that lasted into Wednesday morning. Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch told Associated Press that the majority of demonstrators were peaceful.

A 66-year-old woman in Chicago was injured when she was struck by a car during downtown protests Tuesday evening, police reportedly said. Video showed a car speeding down a street where people were protesting.

In Texas, where police in Austin used chemical irritants to disperse several hundred demonstrators Monday, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott’s office said Texas National Guard troops were “on standby" in areas where demonstrations are planned.

Guard members were sent to San Antonio, but Police Chief William McManus said he had not been told how many troops were deployed or their role ahead of planned protests Wednesday night and Saturday. Officers with the Texas Department of Public Safety said the Texas National Guard was present at a protest downtown.

Also Read | LA Protests Enter the Fifth Day as Trump and Newsom Target Each Other

LA Mayors' Plea

The LA-area mayors and city council members urged Trump to stop using armed military troops alongside immigration agents.

“I’m asking you, please listen to me, stop terrorizing our residents,” said Brenda Olmos, vice mayor of Paramount, who said she was hit by rubber bullets over the weekend. “You need to stop these raids.”

Speaking alongside the other mayors at a news conference, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said the raids spread fear at the behest of the White House. The city’s nightly curfew will remain in effect as long as necessary. It covers a 1-square-mile (2.5-square-kilometer) section of downtown where the protests have been concentrated in the city that encompasses roughly 500 square miles (1,295 square kilometers).

“If there are raids that continue, if there are soldiers marching up and down our streets, I would imagine that the curfew will continue,” Bass said.

The administration has cited the protests in its decision to deploy the military.

California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, has asked a federal court to put an emergency stop to the military helping immigration agents in the nation’s second-largest city. This week, guardsmen began standing protectively around agents as they carry out arrests. A judge set a hearing for Thursday.

The Trump administration called the lawsuit a “crass political stunt endangering American lives" in its official response on Wednesday.

Also Read | Trump Says ‘Protestors At Army Parade Will Be Met With Very Big Force’

Trump Open To Using Insurrection Act

Trump left open the possibility of invoking the Insurrection Act, which authorises the president to deploy military forces inside the US to suppress rebellion or domestic violence or to enforce the law in certain situations. It's one of the most extreme emergency powers available to a US president.

“If there’s an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it. We’ll see,” he said from the Oval Office.

Later, the president called protesters “animals” and “a foreign enemy” in a speech at Fort Bragg ostensibly to recognize the 250th anniversary of the US Army.

Trump has described Los Angeles in dire terms that Bass and Newsom say are nowhere close to the truth.

How Did The Protests Start?

The protests began Friday after federal immigration raids arrested dozens of workers in Los Angeles. Protesters blocked a major freeway and set cars on fire over the weekend, and police responded with tear gas, rubber bullets and flash-bang grenades.

Thousands of people have peacefully rallied outside City Hall and hundreds more protested outside a federal complex that includes a detention center where some immigrants are being held following workplace raids.



AI Regulation, Migration and the New International World Order


Image Credit: Huzeyfe Turan via Unsplash - https://unsplash.com/photos/woman-in-black-and-purple-leopard-print-shirt-D62arqnPgGE
holographic numbers projected onto a person with purple shirt

by Nayla Rida | Jun 12, 2025


In a world where one’s digital blueprint has already become a determining factor for the achievement of various socio-economic rights such as employment, education, and other personal milestones, the prospect of automating this screening and extending it to migration and border control could reshape the globe’s demographics in profound ways. Indeed, an increasingly debated topic regarding AI regulation is its usage for border control screening, which intersects with migrants’ and refugees’ rights.

The EU’s AI Act 2024, which will enter into force in August 2026, has classified the use of AI profiling for border control as high risk and, as such, worthy of high regulation. Indeed, AI has been used to screen asylum and visa applications, ensure an individual is who they claim to be through biometric identification systems, and estimate illegal migration risks. Amongst these regulations is the responsibility of providers to conduct data governance, record-keeping, and the implementation of human oversight. Criminal risk profiling based solely on personality traits inferred from an individual’s data and social scoring, on the other hand, lies amongst the prohibited usages of AI listed in the Act (Chapter II, Article 5).

In addition to this, a lesser talked about risk is the use of already controversial DNA analysis for profiling. Genetic testing providers such as Ancestry.com and CircleDNA both claim to be able to assess one’s innate propensity to risk-taking, for example, based on one’s DNA (although both tests can give different results for the same person). Risk-taking is thought of as one of the main personality traits that AI could possibly be used to assess when profiling applicants to determine their chance of irregular migration and other criminal offenses. With 23andme.com recently filing for bankruptcy after an important data breach, debates about the intersection of DNA testing, data privacy, migration, and AI are more urgent than ever, as, if not prohibited, DNA data analysed by AI could be used in some regions to facilitate migration profiling based on personality profiling. For now, however, the new practice of DNA profiling at the border in the EU, ECOWAS, and other regions, focuses on citizen identification and aims to address the missing persons and human trafficking crisis.

In contrast to this push to put some checks and balances in European border control tech, the Trump administration saw a push towards stricter immigration law enforcement, while inversely advocating for a more liberal AI use in governmental affairs and beyond. The country had indeed already passed various legislations, which vary by states, to facilitate AI profiling to prevent criminal activities whilst accounting for data privacy. In the context of the Trump administration’s migration crackdown, which has been criticised for its lack of due process, AI has been used to profile migrants based on their political inclinations, which arguably contravene several individual liberties listed in the ICCPR and beyond.

All of this could also lead to important demographic changes in the future as even just the looming prospect of a more dystopian version of the US might attract different kinds of immigrants, ideologically speaking and demographically speaking, and retain different kinds of citizens, again based on ideology and demographics. The sociological consequences of such policies on how feasible and attractive various migration destinations are could lead ethnic and sexual minorities, as well as refugees and economic migrants, to gravitate towards destinations with stronger anti-profiling interdictions, such as the EU, which could risk exacerbating the far-right migration pushback in the EU context and their Great Replacement arguments. More likely, developing and emerging destinations in the Global South (specifically the BRICS, South-East Asia, and the GCC) could also gain traction as the transition towards a multipolar global order cements.



About Nayla Rida
Nayla holds an MSc in Modern Middle Eastern Studies from St Antony's College, Oxford (2024) and holds a previous MA in Education, Gender and International Development from UCL's Institute of Education (2022).

Cuts to USAID severed longstanding American support for Indigenous people around the world

June 12, 2025


FILE - Cut down trees lie near the Cordillera Azul National Park in Peru's Amazon Forest on Oct. 3, 2022. (AP Photo/Martin Mejia, File)

Miguel Guimaraes Vasquez fought for years to protect his homeland in the Peruvian Amazon from deforestation related to the cocaine trade, even laboring under death threats from drug traffickers.

A leader in an Indigenous rights group, Vasquez said such efforts were long supported by financial assistance from the U.S. Agency for International Development, which spent billions of dollars starting in the 1980s to help farmers in Peru shift from growing coca for cocaine production to legal crops such as coffee and cacao for chocolate. The agency funded economic and agricultural training and technology, and helped farmers gain access to international markets.

But the Trump administration’s recent sweeping cuts to the agency have thrown that tradition of U.S. assistance into doubt, and Indigenous people in the Amazon worry that without American support there will be a resurgence of the cocaine market, increased threats to their land, and potentially violent challenges to their human rights.

“We don’t have the U.S. government with us anymore. So it can get really dangerous,” said Vásquez, who belongs to the Shipibo-Konibo people and is vice president of the Interethnic Association for the Development of the Peruvian Rainforest. “We think the situation is going to get worse.”

Several Indigenous human rights defenders have been killed trying to protect their land, Vasquez said, and in some of those cases U.S. foreign aid provided money to help prosecute the slayings. “We really needed those resources,” he said.

Sweeping cuts began in January

When Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, began dismantling USAID shortly after President Donald Trump began his second term, it all but eliminated U.S. foreign aid spending, including decades of support to Indigenous peoples around the world.

USAID’s work with Indigenous peoples sought to address a variety of global issues affecting the U.S., according to former employees. Its economic development efforts created jobs in South America, easing the need for people to work in illicit drug markets and reducing the likelihood they would migrate to America seeking jobs and safety. And its support for the rights of Indigenous peoples to steward their own land offered opportunities to mitigate climate change.

That included Vásquez’s organization, which was about to receive a four-year, $2.5 million grant to continue fighting illicit activity that affects Indigenous people in the region. Vásquez said that grant was rescinded by the new administration.

In January, DOGE launched a sweeping effort empowered by Trump to fire government workers and cut trillions in government spending. USAID, which managed about $35 billion in appropriations in fiscal year 2024, was one of his prime targets. Critics say the aid programs are wasteful and promote a liberal agenda. Trump, Musk, and Republicans in Congress have accused the agency of advancing liberal social programs.

“Foreign assistance done right can advance our national interests, protect our borders, and strengthen our partnerships with key allies,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement in March. “Unfortunately, USAID strayed from its original mission long ago. As a result, the gains were too few and the costs were too high.”

Musk last week announced his departure from the Trump administration, marking the end of a turbulent chapter that included thousands of layoffs and reams of litigation.

Former USAID employees said political pressure from the U.S. often kept foreign governments from violating some Indigenous rights.

In the three months since thousands of foreign aid workers were fired and aid contracts canceled, the Peruvian government has moved quickly to strip Indigenous people of their land rights and to tighten controls on international organizations that document human rights abuses. It’s now a serious offense for a nonprofit to provide assistance to anyone working to bring lawsuits against the government.

The National Commission for Development and a Drug-Free Lifestyle, the country’s agency that fights drug trafficking, did not respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press.

“The impact was really, really strong, and we felt it really quickly when the Trump administration changed its stance about USAID,” Vásquez said.

The U.S. spends less than 1% of its budget on foreign assistance. Tim Rieser, a senior foreign policy aide in the Senate who works for Democratic Vermont Sen. Peter Welch, called DOGE’s cuts to USAID a “mindless” setback to years of work.

The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

Agency reached Indigenous communities worldwide

USAID’s work reached Indigenous communities around the world. It sought to mitigate the effects of human rights abuses in South America, created programs in Africa to enable Indigenous people to manage their own communities and led the global U.S. effort to fight hunger.

One of the most recent additions to USAID’s work was incorporating international concepts of Indigenous rights into policy.

Rieser, for instance, was responsible for crafting legislation that created an adviser within USAID to protect the rights and address the needs of Indigenous peoples. The adviser advocated for Indigenous rights in foreign assistance programs, including actions by the World Bank.

“That provided Indigenous people everywhere with a way to be heard here in Washington,” Rieser said. “That has now been silenced.”

That adviser position remains unfilled.

Vy Lam, USAID’s adviser on Indigenous peoples, who said he was fired in March as part of the DOGE downsizing, said the idea of Indigenous rights and the mandate to recognize them in foreign operations was new to USAID. But it gained momentum under President Joe Biden’s administration.

He said concepts such as “free, prior and informed consent” — the right of Indigenous people to give or withhold approval for any action that would affect their lands or rights — were slowly being implemented in American foreign policy.

One of the ways that happened, Lam said, came in the form of U.S. political pressure on foreign governments or private industry to negotiate mutually beneficial agreements between Indigenous peoples and their governments.

For instance, if an American company wanted to build a hotel in an area that could affect an Indigenous community, the U.S. could push for the deal to require Indigenous approval, or at least consultation.

“We had that convening power, and that is the thing that I grieve the most,” Lam said.

U.S. foreign aid workers were also able to facilitate the reporting of some human rights violations, such as when a human rights or environmental defender is jailed without charges, or Indigenous peoples are forced off their land for the establishment of a protected area.

Money supported attendance at international meetings

In some cases, USAID supported travel to the United Nations, where Indigenous leaders and advocates could receive training to navigate international bodies and document abuses.

Last year, under the Biden administration, USAID awarded a five-year grant to support Indigenous LGBTQIA people through the United Nations Voluntary Fund for Indigenous People, an agency that offers financial support to Indigenous peoples to participate in the U.N.

At $350,000 per year, it was the largest grant from any member state in the U.N., fund Secretary Morse Flores said. The money would have paid for attendance at the U.N. and other international bodies to report human rights abuses and to testify on foreign policy.

In February, the fund received notice that the grant would be terminated. The State Department does not plan to fulfill its pledge to fund the remaining four years of the grant.

In most cases, people receiving assistance to attend major meetings “are actual victims of human rights violations,” Flores said. “For someone who’s unable to come and speak up, I mean, it’s really just an injustice.”

___

This story was published in partnership with Grist, a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.
Starvation alert as children fill Kenya refugee ward after US aid cuts

Anne Soy
BBC News, Kakuma
BBC
Children on the ward are given milk every three hours in a bid to boost their intake of nutrients


Hundreds of thousands of people are "slowly starving" in Kenyan refugee camps after US funding cuts reduced food rations to their lowest ever levels, a United Nations official has told the BBC.

The impact is starkly visible at a hospital in the sprawling Kakuma camp in the north-west of the East African nation. It is home to roughly 300,000 refugees who have fled strife in countries across Africa and the Middle East.

Emaciated children fill a 30-bed ward at Kakuma's Amusait Hospital, staring blankly at visitors as they receive treatment for severe acute malnutrition.

One baby, Hellen, barely moves. Parts of her skin are wrinkled and peeling, leaving angry patches of red - the result of malnutrition, a medic tells the BBC.

Across the aisle lies a nine-month-old baby, James, the eighth child of Agnes Awila, a refugee from northern Uganda.

"The food is not enough, my children eat only once a day. If there's no food what do you feed them?" she asks.

James, Hellen and thousands of other refugees in Kakuma depend on the UN's World Food Programme (WFP) for vital sustenance.

But the agency had to drastically reduce its aid operations in many countries after President Donald Trump announced sweeping cuts to US foreign aid programmes earlier this year, as part of his "America First" policy.

The US had provided around 70% of the funding for the WFP's operations in Kenya.

The WFP says that as a result of the cuts, the agency has had to slash the refugees' rations to 30% of the minimum recommended amount a person should eat to stay healthy.

"If we have a protracted situation where this is what we can manage, then basically we have a slowly starving population," says Felix Okech, the WFP's head of refugee operations in Kenya.


Some of the malnourished children at Amusait Hospital can only be fed via tubes


Outside Kakuma's food distribution centre, the sun beats down on the dry, dusty ground and security officers manage queues of refugees.

They are led into a holding centre and then a verification area. Aid workers scan the refugees' identity cards and take their fingerprints, before taking them to collect their rations.

Mukuniwa Bililo Mami, a mother of two, has brought a jerrycan to collect cooking oil, along with sacks for lentils and rice.

"I am grateful to receive this little [food] but it is not enough," says the 51-year-old, who arrived in the camp 13 years ago from South Kivu, a region in conflict-hit eastern Democratic Republic of Congo

Ms Mami says the refugees used to "eat well" - three meals a day. But now that rations are at 30% of their usual amount, the food she has been given is not enough to last one month, let alone the two that she has been asked to stretch it for.

She has also been affected by another casualty of the cuts - cash transfers.

Until this year, the UN was giving around $4m (£3m) in cash directly to refugees in Kenya's camps each month, intended to allow families to buy basic supplies.

Ms Mami, who is diabetic, used the cash to buy food, like vegetables, which were more appropriate for her diet than the cereals handed out at the distribution centre.

Now, she is forced to eat whatever is available.

She also used the money to start a vegetable garden and rear chicken and ducks, which she sold to other refugees, at a market.

But the discontinuation of the cash transfers, locally known as "bamba chakula", has meant that the market faces collapse.

Traders like Badaba Ibrahim, who is from the Nuba Mountains in Sudan, are no longer able to extend lines of credit to fellow refugees.

The 42-year-old runs a retail shop in the local shopping centre. He says his customers, now unable to purchase food, at times camp at his shop all day, begging for help.

"They will tell you, 'My children have not eaten for a full day,'" Mr Ibrahim says.

Elsewhere in the Kakuma camp, 28-year-old Agnes Livio serves up food for her five young sons.

They live in a cubicle, which is roughly 2m (6ft 6in) by 2m made from corrugated iron sheets.

Ms Livio serves the food on one large plate for all to share. It is the family's first meal of the day - at 1400.


Single mother Agnes Livio found safety after leaving South Sudan for Kenya

"We used to get porridge for breakfast but not anymore. So, the children have to wait until the afternoon to have their first meal," says Ms Livio, who fled from South Sudan.

Back at Amusait Hospital, medics are feeding a number of malnourished infants through tubes.

Three toddlers and their mothers are being discharged - back to the community where food is scarce and conditions are deteriorating.

And the prospect of more funding is not very promising and unless things change over the next two months, the refugees are staring at starvation come August.

"It is a really dire situation," admits Mr Okech.

"We do have some signals from some one or two donors about support with that cash component.

"But remember, the very kind and generous US has been providing over 70% - so if you're still missing 70%… those prospects are not good."
Advertisement


You may also be interested in:
'My wife fears sex, I fear death' - impacts of the USAID freeze
Africa is important to Trump, despite aid cuts, envoy tells BBC]
Nigeria and Kenya among nations running out of HIV drugs - WHO
How Trump locked out contraception in Africa