Friday, August 22, 2025

Israel approves settlement plan to erase idea of Palestinian state

Reuters
Wed, August 20, 2025 

FILE PHOTO: Israeli Finance Minister Smotrich speaks at a press conference regarding settlements expansion, near the Israeli settlement of Maale Adumim


Israeli flag flutters, as part of the Israeli settlement 
of Maale Adumim
 is visible in the background, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank


JERUSALEM (Reuters) -A widely condemned Israeli settlement plan that would cut across land that the Palestinians seek for a state received final approval on Wednesday, according to a statement from Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich.

The approval of the E1 project, which would bisect the occupied West Bank and cut it off from East Jerusalem, was announced last week by Smotrich and received the final go-ahead from a Defence Ministry planning commission on Wednesday, he said.

"With E1, we are delivering finally on what has been promised for years," Smotrich, an ultra-nationalist in the ruling right-wing coalition, said in a statement. "The Palestinian state is being erased from the table, not with slogans but with actions."

Restarting the project could further isolate Israel, which has watched some Western allies frustrated by its continuation and planned escalation of the Gaza war announce they may recognise a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in September.

"We condemn the decision taken today on expanding this particular settlement, which ... will drive a stake through the heart of the two-state solution," said U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric. "We call on the government of Israel to halt all settlement activity."

The Palestinian Foreign Ministry also condemned the announcement, saying the E1 settlement would isolate Palestinian communities living in the area and undermine the possibility of a two-state solution.

British Foreign Minister David Lammy said on X: "If implemented, it would divide a Palestinian state in two, mark a flagrant breach of international law and critically undermine the two-state solution."

A German government spokesperson commenting on the announcement told reporters that settlement construction violates international law and "hinders a negotiated two-state solution and an end to the Israeli occupation of the West Bank."

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has not commented on the E1 announcement.

However on Sunday, during a visit to Ofra, another West Bank settlement established a quarter of a century ago, he made broader comments, saying: "I said 25 years ago that we will do everything to secure our grip on the Land of Israel, to prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state, to prevent the attempts to uproot us from here. Thank God, what I promised, we have delivered."

The two-state solution to the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict envisages a Palestinian state in East Jerusalem, the West Bank, and Gaza, existing side by side with Israel.

Western capitals and campaign groups have opposed the settlement project due to concerns that it could undermine a future peace deal with the Palestinians.

The plan for E1, located adjacent to Maale Adumim and frozen in 2012 and 2020 amid objections from the U.S. and European governments, involves the construction of about 3,400 new housing units.

Infrastructure work could begin within a few months, and house building in about a year, according to Israeli advocacy group Peace Now, which tracks settlement activity in the West Bank.

Most of the international community considers Israeli settlements in the West Bank illegal under international law.

Israel disputes this, citing historical and biblical ties to the area and saying the settlements provide strategic depth and security.

(Reporting by Lili Bayer and Maayan Lubell in Jerusalem, Ali Sawafta in Ramallah, Rachel More in Berlin and Michelle Nichols at the United Nations; Editing by Aidan Lewis, Rod Nickel)

Israel starts Gaza assault, approves West Bank plan

Rafi Schwartz, 
The Week US
Thu, August 21, 2025 


IDF soldiers prepare tanks on Aug. 18, 2025, near the Gaza Strip's northern borders. | Credit: Elke Scholiers / Getty Images

What happened

Israel Wednesday said its forces have pushed into the outskirts of Gaza City and it will activate 60,000 reservists for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's planned operation to seize the whole city. Netanyahu's government also gave final approval Wednesday to a controversial settlement project in the West Bank that would effectively cut the occupied Palestinian territory in two. Far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said approval of the settlements meant the "dangerous idea" of a Palestinian state was "being erased from the table."

Who said what

The Israeli Defense Forces "have begun preliminary operations and the first stages of the attack on Gaza City" and Hamas' "battered and bruised" fighters, Israeli military spokesperson Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin told reporters. But Israel's "exhausted military may face a manpower problem," CNN said. In a "country of fewer than 10 million people," The Associated Press said, the large call-up of reservists "carries economic and political weight."

Israel is "bucking international criticism" and "growing support" for Palestinian statehood in moving ahead with its Gaza City invasion and West Bank settlements, The New York Times said. The two moves suggest that Netanyahu is "bending to the ideologies of extremists" in his government, "even at the cost of isolating Israel internationally." In a new Reuters/Ipsos poll, 58% of Americans said they believed every country in the United Nations should recognize Palestine as a nation.

In Gaza, residents are "bracing for the worst," said Al Jazeera. Israel's assault "will just create another mass displacement of people who have been displaced repeatedly," U.N. spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric told reporters. The situation in Gaza is "nothing short of apocalyptic reality for children, for their families and for this generation," Save the Children regional director Ahmad Alhendawi told the AP.

What next?

Israel said it would warn Gaza City residents before a full-scale attack and give civilians a chance to evacuate. The IDF reservists won't have to report for duty until next month, "an interval that gives mediators some time to bridge gaps between Hamas and Israel" over a ceasefire proposal Hamas endorsed earlier this week, Reuters said.


Israel approves settlement project that could divide West Bank

Melanie Lidman, Associated Press
Wed, August 20, 2025 

Israel has given final approval for a controversial settlement project in the occupied West Bank that would effectively cut the territory in two, and that Palestinians and rights groups say could destroy plans for a future Palestinian state.

Settlement development in E1, an open tract of land east of Jerusalem, has been under consideration for more than two decades – but was frozen due to US pressure during previous administrations.

On Wednesday, the project received final approval from the Planning and Building Committee after the last petitions against it were rejected on August 6.

If the process moves quickly, infrastructure work could begin in the next few months and construction of homes could start in around a year.


View of an area near Maale Adumim in the Israeli-occupied West Bank (Ohad Zwigenberg/AP)

The plan includes around 3,500 apartments to expand the settlement of Maale Adumim, far-right finance minister Bezalel Smotrich said during a press conference at the site last Thursday.

Mr Smotrich cast the approval as a riposte to western countries that announced their plans to recognise a Palestinian state in recent weeks.

“This reality finally buries the idea of a Palestinian state, because there is nothing to recognise and no-one to recognise,” Mr Smotrich told reporters.

“Anyone in the world who tries today to recognise a Palestinian state will receive an answer from us on the ground.”

The location of E1 is significant because it is one of the last geographical links between Ramallah, in the northern West Bank, and Bethlehem in the southern West Bank.

The two cities are 14 miles apart by air, but Palestinians travelling between them must take a wide detour and pass through multiple Israeli checkpoints, adding hours to the journey.

The hope for final status negotiations for a Palestinian state was to have the region eventually serve as a direct link between the cities.

Peace Now, an organisation that tracks settlement expansion in the West Bank, called the E1 project “deadly for the future of Israel and for any chance of achieving a peaceful two-state solution” which is “guaranteeing many more years of bloodshed”.

Israel’s plans to expand settlements are part of an increasingly difficult reality for Palestinians in the occupied West Bank as the world’s attention focuses on the war in Gaza.

There have been marked increases in attacks by settlers on Palestinians, evictions from Palestinian towns, and checkpoints that choke freedom of movement, as well as several Palestinian attacks on Israelis.

More than 700,000 Israelis now live in the occupied West Bank and east Jerusalem, territories captured by Israel in 1967 and sought by the Palestinians for a future state.

The international community overwhelmingly considers Israeli settlement construction in these areas to be illegal and an obstacle to peace.

Israel’s government is dominated by religious and ultra-nationalist politicians with close ties to the settlement movement.

Mr Smotrich, previously a firebrand settler leader and now finance minister, has been granted Cabinet-level authority over settlement policies and vowed to double the settler population in the West Bank.

Israel has annexed east Jerusalem and claims it as part of its capital, which is not internationally recognised.

It says the West Bank is disputed territory whose fate should be determined through negotiations. Israel withdrew from 21 settlements Gaza in 2005.


Israeli committee approves controversial West Bank settlement project

DPA
Wed, August 20, 2025 


Israeli soldiers raid the Balata refugee camp in Nablus. Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images via ZUMA Press Wire/dpa

An Israeli planning committee approved a highly contested settlement project in the occupied West Bank on Wedneday, according to the Israeli organization Peace Now, which had a representative at the meeting.

Critics say the move could severely undermine prospects for a future Palestinian state.

The plan foresees the construction of about 3,400 housing units in the so-called E1 area, a stretch of land between East Jerusalem and the settlement of Maale Adumim.

The area, about 12 square kilometres in size, is considered one of the most sensitive in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Construction there would effectively divide the West Bank into northern and southern sections, making it much harder, if not impossible, to form a connected Palestinian state - which has always been envisaged to include the geographically distinct Gaza Strip.

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich announced the proposal last week, saying the step "buries the idea of a Palestinian state once and for all."

The move comes as several countries, including France, Canada, and Australia, have pledged to recognize a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September.

Israel has rejected such recognition, calling it a "reward for Hamas" following the October 7, 2023, attack.

Israel has repeatedly postponed construction plans for E1 in the past, due to international pressure.

A spokeswoman for Peace Now said Wednesday's authorization was the "final approval."

However, the government could stop the plan at any time in the future if it wanted to. In the past, projects had been stopped even after construction had already begun, the advocacy group noted.

West Bank turning into 'patchwork quilt'


In 1967, Israel seized the West Bank and East Jerusalem, where more than 700,000 settlers now live among some 3 million Palestinians. Under international law, the settlements are illegal.

The Palestinians claim the territories for their own state with East Jerusalem as its capital. Even under the status quo, however, the systematic settlement of the West Bank would leave the Palestinians with a patchwork of land to form their own state.

The Israeli government rejects the two-state solution on the grounds that it would endanger Israel's existence. Right-wing government ministers are very pro-settler and are pushing for Israel to annex the West Bank.

According to Peace Now, efforts to develop the E1 area date back to the 1990s. After Palestine was recognized as a UN observer state in 2012, there was an upswing in the project at the urging of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. However, the initiative was subsequently slowed down.

How does Israel justify the construction plans?

The Israeli leadership justifies the construction plans in E1 with security interests, arguing that creating territorial continuity between Jerusalem and Maale Adumim is important from this perspective.

Right-wing Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich openly says that the aim is to prevent the establishment of a future Palestinian state, which he sees as an existential threat to Israel.

He says the construction plans are "Zionism at its best" and strengthen Israel's sovereignty. Smotrich is also a minister in the Defence Ministry with responsibility for civilian affairs in the West Bank.

He has threatened to annex the West Bank if Western countries go ahead with their plan to recognize a Palestinian state next month. Nearly 150 of the 193 member states of the United Nations have already done so.


Over 20 nations join EU, UN in opposing Israel’s illegal E1 settlement plan

Al Jazeera
Thu, August 21, 2025 


(AFP)
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.Generate Key Takeaways

The United Kingdom, Australia and Japan are among 21 countries that have condemned Israel’s plans to build a controversial illegal settlement in the occupied West Bank, which they say renders a future two-state solution for Palestinians impossible.

“We condemn this decision and call for its immediate reversal in the strongest terms,” the 21 countries said in a joint statement on Thursday, describing Israel’s construction plans as a “violation of international law”.

The statement follows news this week that Israel will formally move forward with a settlement on a 12-square-kilometre (4.6-square-mile) tract of land east of Jerusalem known as “East 1” or “E1”.

The development, which will include 3,400 new homes for Israeli settlers, will cut off much of the occupied West Bank from occupied East Jerusalem while also linking up thousands of illegal Israeli settlements in the area.

East Jerusalem carries particular significance to Palestinians as the top choice for the capital of a future Palestinian state.

The group of 21 nations said any plans for a two-state solution will become impossible “by dividing any Palestinian state and restricting Palestinian access to Jerusalem”.

The group includes Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden.



The illegal settlement also “risks undermining security and fuels further violence and instability, taking us further away from peace”, the group said, while bringing “no benefits to the Israeli people”.

The Palestinian Authority, the European Commission and United Nations chief Antonio Guterres have all voiced opposition to plans for the E1 settlement since Israel first announced the news last week.

“Coupled with ongoing settler violence and military operations, these unilateral decisions are fuelling an already tense situation on the ground and further eroding any possibility for peace,” the European Union said in a statement on August 14.

Israel’s far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said settlements such as E1 will help erase Palestine from the map, even as Palestinian statehood gains increasing international recognition from UN member states.

“This reality finally buries the idea of a Palestinian state, because there is nothing to recognise and no one to recognise,” Smotrich said last week.

Analysis: Israel E1 settlement plan makes Palestinian state further away

Mat Nashed
Thu, August 21, 2025

Israel’s approval of a long-delayed and controversial settlement plan on Wednesday intends to end any chance of a contiguous Palestinian state, say analysts, local human rights groups and Palestinian communities likely to be affected.

Known as East1 or E1, the plan would link thousands of illegal settlements in occupied East Jerusalem – which is already illegally annexed by Israel – to the expanding Maale Adumim settlement bloc in the occupied West Bank.

This would fully sever East Jerusalem – which Palestinians have long considered the capital of their own future state – from the rest of the occupied West Bank.

European states have long warned that the E1 plan is a red line, said Tahani Mustafa, an expert on Israel-Palestine with the International Crisis Group (ICG).

Some of these states, such as Ireland, France, Norway and Spain, have recently announced plans to recognise a Palestinian state in the face of mounting pressure to take action against Israel for its war in Gaza.

Israel’s far-right finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, warned last year that a new settlement would be established for every country that recognises Palestine.

More recently, Smotrich, who himself lives in an illegal settlement on Palestinian land, said last week that the E1 plan would “bury” hopes for a Palestinian state.

Israeli politicians, including Smotrich, have long been open in remarking that the establishment of settlements in the occupied West Bank creates “facts on the ground” and regard the territory as an integral part of the “land of Israel”.

Mustafa said that Israel calculated long ago that the global community would take no meaningful action to stop Israel from killing the two-state solution.

“There won’t be anything left to recognise if these states keep allowing Israel to annex the West Bank and destroy Gaza,” she told Al Jazeera.

Opportune


The E1 plan was first drummed up in 1994 under then Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, just a year after he inked the United States-backed Oslo Accords, which ostensibly aimed to bring about a Palestinian state before the new millennium


In 2004, Israel began building a police station and constructing new roads in that area of Palestinian land. Since then, construction and further planning have been mostly frozen to appease Western leaders, who feared that building thousands of new housing units there would make it impossible to establish a Palestinian state across the occupied West Bank and Gaza.

Yet since the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on October 7, the US and Europe have allowed Israel to violate every previous “red line” in the name of “self-defence”, said analysts and human rights monitors.

Over the last two years, Israel has carried out its war on Gaza – killing more than 62,000 Palestinians and destroying the territory – and has violently attacked large swaths of the West Bank, forcing out tens of thousands of Palestinians from their homes.

Israeli soldiers and settlers have also ramped up their violence against Palestinians, killing more than 1,000 people without repercussions.

Israel is now betting on its strong support from US President Donald Trump to accelerate the E1 plan, which would put the final “bullet” in the coffin of a Palestinian state and uproot Palestinian Bedouin communities, said Murad Jadallah, a researcher with the Palestinian human rights organisation Al-Haq.

“Israel knows that now is the time [to go through with the E1 plan] because it has US support in Washington to do so,” Mustafa, from the ICG, told Al Jazeera.


(Al Jazeera)

Along with severing East Jerusalem, the controversial plan would physically split the north of the West Bank from the south, further confining Palestinians to ever smaller and isolated pockets of land.

On top of that, several thousand people live in 18 Palestinian shepherd communities in the area encompassing the E1 settlement plan.

The United Nations and Israeli and Palestinian human rights groups have said this plan would uproot Palestinian communities and likely constitute a “forced transfer of a population”, which is a crime against humanity under international law.

“It is very strategic for Israel to push these communities [off their land],” said Al-Haq’s Jadallah.
Fighting to stay

For decades, shepherd communities in the Jordan Valley have protected the possibility of a Palestinian state by refusing to leave their land, despite facing repeated settler attacks and demolition orders.

Most of these communities migrated to Khan al-Ahmar – an area in the central West Bank between Jerusalem and the Maale Adumim settlement – after they were driven out of the Naqeb (Negev) desert by Israel in the 1950s.

The expulsions were part of a broader campaign of ethnic cleansing, in which 750,000 Palestinians were expelled from their lands by Zionist militias to make way for the state of Israel – an event Palestinians refer to as the Nakba or Catastrophe.

Imad al-Jahalin, the leader of a shepherd community in Bir al-Maskub, one of many villages in the E1 zone, says his community has managed to protect itself from expulsion for years.

Last year, the community hired an Israeli Jewish lawyer to file a lawsuit against settlers who occupied some of their homes. The rights group Amnesty has previously accused the Israeli court system of serving to “rubber stamp” Israel’s occupation in the occupied Palestinian territories.

Still, al-Jahalin said his village managed to win a court order to kick out the settlers from their homes. That order was implemented, but he worries they may not win another legal battle if the state begins implementing the E1 plan.

“There is fear and panic because we don’t know if this [settlement] is going to cut through our village and houses,” he told Al Jazeera.

But Jadallah is quite certain that the E1 plan will uproot Bedouin communities in and around Khan al-Ahmar, adding that they will be forced to migrate to large cities in the West Bank.

Their forced displacement to urban centres would require them to leave their livelihoods as shepherds behind.

“Palestinian history and society is losing one layer – or component – from its identity [because of Israeli attacks against Bedouins],” he told Al Jazeera.

Irreversible changes


The E1 plan should be understood as the culmination of Israeli attempts to change the spatial reality of the West Bank, so that a Palestinian state will never come to fruition, said Mustafa from the ICG.

She added that this is a strategy Israel has deployed since signing the Oslo Accords.

Israel, for instance, has long uprooted entire Palestinian villages and dispersed communities, bulldozed bustling refugee camps and erected dozens of barricades to impede the movement of Palestinians.

“The fact Israel is able … to reshape the urban landscape of the West Bank and make [those changes] so irreversible is indicative that Israel has no intention of committing to a two-state solution,” she said.

Alon Cohen, the head of the West Bank area for Bimkom, an Israeli human rights organisation advocating for an end to the occupation, added that there is no economic or housing rationale for implementing E1.

He stressed that the logic behind E1 was to simply encroach and irreversibly fragment Palestinian territory.

“Israel always uses settlement planning as a weapon,” he told Al Jazeera.

Both Mustafa and Cohen believe the implementation of E1 will make life for Palestinians in the West Bank even more unbearable, stressing that the ultimate plan is to push more Palestinians to consider leaving the West Bank.

However, al-Jahalin said that’s not an option for him and his community in Bir al-Maskub.

“Nobody here has any idea where they will end up in the future [if we are forcefully displaced],” he told Al Jazeera.

“[Our] people for now … are not thinking of going anywhere.”
Most Americans believe countries should recognize Palestinian state, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds

Patricia Zengerle and Jason Lange
Wed, August 20, 2025 


Palestinians inspect the site of an overnight Israeli strike on a house, in Gaza City

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A 58% majority of Americans believe that every country in the United Nations should recognize Palestine as a nation, according to a new Reuters/Ipsos poll, as Israel and Hamas considered a possible truce in the nearly two-year-long Gaza war.

Some 33% of respondents did not agree that U.N. members should recognize a Palestinian state and 9% did not answer.

The six-day poll, which closed on Monday, found a pronounced partisan divide on the issue, with 78% of Democrats supporting the idea, far more than the 41% of President Donald Trump's Republicans who agreed.

A narrow 53% majority of Republicans did not agree that all U.N. member nations should recognize a Palestinian state.

Israel has long counted on the U.S., its most powerful ally, for billions of dollars a year in military aid and international diplomatic support. An erosion of U.S. public support would be a worrisome sign for Israel as it faces not only Hamas militants in Gaza but unresolved conflict with Iran, its regional arch-foe.

A widely condemned Israeli settlement plan that would cut across occupied West Bank land which the Palestinians seek for a state received final approval on Wednesday, according to an Israeli government statement.

The poll was taken within weeks of three countries, close U.S. allies Canada, Britain and France, announcing they intend to recognize a Palestinian state. This ratcheted up pressure on Israel as starvation spreads in Gaza.

The survey was taken amid hopes that Israel and Hamas would agree on a ceasefire to provide a break in the fighting, free some hostages and ease shipments of humanitarian assistance into the Gaza Strip.

Britain, Canada, Australia and several of their European allies said last week that the humanitarian crisis in the war-torn Palestinian enclave has reached "unimaginable levels," as aid groups warned that Gazans are on the verge of famine.

The United Nations human rights office said on Tuesday Israel was not letting enough supplies into the Gaza Strip to avert widespread starvation. Israel has denied responsibility for hunger in Gaza, accusing Hamas of stealing aid shipments, which Hamas denies

Some 65% of the Reuters/Ipsos poll respondents said the U.S. should take action in Gaza to help people facing starvation, with 28% disagreeing. The number disagreeing included 41% of Republicans.

Trump and many of his fellow Republicans take an "America First" approach to international relations, backing steep cuts to the country's international food and medical assistance programs in the belief that U.S. funds should assist Americans, not those outside its borders.

The war in Gaza began when Hamas-led fighters stormed into Israel on October 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages, according to Israeli figures. Israel's offensive has since killed more than 62,000 Palestinians, plunged Gaza into humanitarian crisis and displaced most of its population, according to Gaza health authorities.

The Reuters/Ipsos poll also showed that 59% of Americans believe Israel's military response in Gaza has been excessive. Thirty-three percent of respondents disagreed.

In a similar Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in February 2024, 53% of respondents agreed that Israel's response had been excessive, and 42% disagreed.

Officials at the Israeli embassy in Washington and mission to the United Nations did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the poll.

The latest Reuters/Ipsos survey, conducted online, gathered responses from 4,446 U.S. adults nationwide and had a margin of error of about 2 percentage points.

'Horror' in Gaza is 'incomprehensible,' says US doctor who treated patients there


 she believes the conditions in Gaza are a "deliberate choice" made by Israeli leadership, and called on the U.S. government to withdraw its support for what she called "complete indiscriminate" violence.


NADINE EL-BAWAB and NIDHI SINGH
Thu, August 21, 2025 

Dr. Aqsa Durrani, an American physician who has been providing humanitarian work around the world for over 15 years, said amid the harrowing scenes of death and destruction in Gaza, one story especially sticks with her.

Found injured and alone after an Israeli airstrike, a 4-year-old girl was taken to a trauma field hospital in central Gaza, she told ABC News.

"She was completely in shock. She was not talking and [a colleague] decided, 'I have to take this little girl home and I have try to see if I can help her find her family,'" said Durrani, a pediatric ICU doctor and an epidemiologist who worked with Doctors Without Borders in Gaza earlier this year

Durrani, who said her colleagues are working in conditions that are "incomprehensible," recently gained major attention for an interview on the digital platform "Humans of New York."


Eyad Baba/AFP via Getty Images - PHOTO: Palestinians gather to receive cooked meals from a food distribution center in the Nuseirat refugee camp in the central Gaza Strip on Aug. 18, 2025.

"He has kids around her age. He tried to feed her, he tried have his kids play with her," Durrani told ABC News. "She was completely non-emotive -- for days. And for those days, he tried to find her family."

He looked in the area where the airstrike hit -- a location where displaced people were sheltering -- but he wasn't able to find her family there, according to Durrani.

"Finally, he said that he found a man who said that he had a niece that age and that they were staying in that area, so he brought him to her," Durrani said.

"He said that when she saw him, she yelled out 'ammo,' which means uncle in Arabic, and she ran to him and hugged him. And it was the first time [my colleague] had heard her speak," Durrani said.

But this was only one child and it took days to find her family because they had been displaced multiple times, Durrani told ABC News.

"I said, 'It's so beautiful that you took her and you were able to reunite her with her uncle.' And he said, 'I have to do that. I have do that because I have to believe that someone will do that for me when this happens to me, or someone will do that for my children,'" Durrani said

"I think the story exemplifies every aspect of the horror that everyone is experiencing," Durrani said.


ABC News - PHOTO: Dr. Aqsa Durrani, a pediatric ICU doctor and an epidemiologist, worked with Doctors Without Borders in Gaza earlier this year.

Durrani was based in central Gaza -- working at a trauma field hospital there -- from Feb. 24 to April 24, witnessing the end of Israel's ceasefire agreement with Hamas and the weekslong blockade on all humanitarian aid.

Field hospitals -- which are tents and semi-permanent structures -- were meant to offload existing hospitals. At the field hospital where Durrani worked, they were only able to provide care to injured or burn patients, she said.

"We could not possibly provide other services with the circumstances that we were in," Durrani said. "We really had to keep it to lifesaving trauma service."

"Now, most of the patients that they're receiving are injured at these supposed aid-distribution sites. They are receiving now more patients with gunshot wounds, including children with gunshot wounds. Each day continues to get worse and we have just been witnessing this genocidal violence now for months and months and it's beyond anything that even our most experienced humanitarian colleagues can imagine," Durrani said.

The Israel Defense Forces have previously said shooting incidents at aid sites were under review, but has also said in few instances that it fired "warning shots" toward people who were allegedly "advancing while posing a threat to the troops."

At least 2,018 have died trying to get humanitarian aid in Gaza and another 15,000 have been injured since May 28, according to Gaza's Hamas-run Ministry of Health.

Durrani said her colleagues, despite experiencing constant horror were "committed to doing everything in the best way possible and despite their own personal trauma" and continue to come in every day.

"We've had physicians who receive their own family members in the ER during during mass casualty incidents. They're enduring these horrors and also working to provide care in those circumstances," she said.

"What I cannot stress enough is that they -- even in those circumstances, and even despite relentless trauma -- were providing beautiful, compassionate, evidence-based care," Durrani said.



Omar Al-Qattaa/AFP via Getty Images - PHOTO: Palestinians salvage items from the rubble of homes destroyed in Israeli strikes on the southern al-Zeitoun neighbourhood in Gaza City on Aug. 19, 2025.

Durrani recalled one day when they "called a child psychiatrist, who was one of the only child psychiatrists in the whole Gaza Strip, he was so apologetic that he could not come to see the children that day and told us that it was because he was actually himself displaced that day, and that he had lost some of his family members."

The majority of their patients were women and children "even though our hospital was for everyone," she said.

"We would round on all of the injured patients with the surgeons and go patient by patient. And often there were airstrikes nearby, and the Palestinian doctors and nurses would just speak louder over the bombs. And just continue providing compassionate care to the patients as we continued down the line," Durrani said.

Food was becoming more scarce toward the end of Durrani's time in Gaza, she said.

"Much of our days were actually spent trying to work with other organizations to see if we could find any food to give anyone. At the end, I was only able to provide patients with one meal per day, and mothers and children were sharing one portion of one meal," she said.

"I even had one mother say, 'Is there anything you can give my child to distract him from the hunger?' And this was a child who had been burned by a fire that resulted from an airstrike," she said.

Durrani said she believes the conditions in Gaza are a "deliberate choice" made by Israeli leadership, and called on the U.S. government to withdraw its support for what she called "complete indiscriminate" violence.


ABC News - PHOTO: Dr. Aqsa Durrani, a pediatric ICU doctor and an epidemiologist, worked with Doctors Without Borders in Gaza earlier this year.

The Israeli government has denied that it is limiting the amount of aid entering Gaza and has claimed Hamas steals aid meant for civilians. Hamas has denied those claims.

Israel's cabinet has approved plans to expand its military campaign in Gaza, drawing widespread criticism from the United Nations and key allies including Germany. U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk said on Aug. 8 the escalation "will result in more killing, more unbearable suffering, [and] senseless destruction."

More than 100 aid groups have warned of "mass starvation" in Gaza, describing a dire food shortage due to the Israeli government's siege.

Israeli government spokesman David Mencer pushed back, saying "there is no famine" in Gaza. He blamed Hamas and called the food crisis in Gaza "a man-made shortage engineered by Hamas."

A USAID analysis appeared to undercut Israeli assertions about the extent to which Hamas has allegedly stolen humanitarian aid. A presentation reviewed by ABC News, examining more than 150 reported incidents involving the theft or loss of U.S.-funded humanitarian aid in Gaza, showed that the group failed to find any evidence that Hamas engaged in widespread diversion of aid to cause the amount of hunger seen in the strip.

Durrani said providing medical aid in the Gaza Strip was an experience unlike any other.

"It's dystopian, but it elicits a very visceral response. It's just completely unfathomable that it's actually, real, everything around you. I entered through the Karam Shalom crossing and we drove through Rafah and Rafah was at that point, even in late February, almost completely destroyed. It just looked like a dystopian reality," Durrani said.
Federal judge orders closure of Trump’s ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ immigration jail

Richard Luscombe in Miami
THE GUARDIAN
Thu, August 21, 2025 


An aerial view shows RVs in ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ at Dade-Collier Training and Transition airport in Florida in July.Photograph: Marco Bello/Reuters


A federal judge in Miami late on Thursday ordered the closure of the Trump administration’s notorious “Alligator Alcatrazimmigration jail within 60 days, and ruled that no more detainees were to be brought to the facility while it was being wound down.

The shock ruling by district court judge Kathleen Williams builds on a temporary restraining order she issued two weeks ago halting further construction work at the remote tented camp, which has attracted waves of criticism for harsh conditions, abuse of detainees and denial of due process as they await deportation.

In her 82-page order, published in the US district court’s southern district of Florida on Friday, Williams determined the facility was causing severe and irreparable damage to the fragile Florida Everglades.

She also noted that a plan to develop the site on which the jail was built into a massive tourist airport was rejected in the 1960s because of the harm it would have caused the the land and delicate ecosystem.

“Since that time, every Florida governor, every Florida senator, and countless local and national political figures, including presidents, have publicly pledged their unequivocal support for the restoration, conservation, and protection of the Everglades,” she wrote.

“This order does nothing more than uphold the basic requirements of legislation designed to fulfill those promises.”

No further construction at the site can take place, she ruled, and there must be no further increase in the number of detainees currently held there, estimated to be about 700. After the 60-day period, all construction materials, fencing, generators and fixtures that made the site a detention camp must be removed.

The ruling is a significant victory for a coalition of environmental groups and a native American tribe that sued the state of Florida and the federal government. Williams agreed that the hasty, eight-day construction of the jail at a disused airfield in late June damaged the sensitive wetlands of a national preserve and further imperiled federally protected species.

“This is a landmark victory for the Everglades and countless Americans who believe this imperiled wilderness should be protected, not exploited,” said Eve Samples, executive director of Friends of the Everglades, one of the groups that filed the lawsuit.

“It sends a clear message that environmental laws must be respected by leaders at the highest levels of our government, and there are consequences for ignoring them.”

The alliance plans to hold a press conference on Friday morning to discuss the ruling in detail.

Conversely, the ruling is a blow to the detention and deportation agenda of the Trump administration. The president touted the camp, which recently held as many as 1,400 detainees, as a jail for “some of the most vicious people on the planet”, although hundreds of those held there have no criminal record or active criminal proceedings against them.

There was no immediate reaction to Williams’s ruling from the Florida department of emergency management, which operates the jail on behalf of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (Ice), or from the Department of Homeland Security.

But lawyers for the state told Williams in court last week that they would appeal any adversarial ruling, the Miami Herald reported.

In addition, hundreds of detainees were moved from “Alligator Alcatraz” to other immigration facilities at the weekend in anticipation that Williams would order its closure, the outlet said.

Ron DeSantis, Florida’s Republican governor, announced earlier this month that the state will soon open a second immigration jail at a disused prison near Gainesville to increase capacity.



LOOTING
Trump weighs using $2 billion in CHIPS Act funding for critical minerals, sources say

Ernest Scheyder and Jarrett Renshaw
Updated Thu, August 21, 2025 



(Reuters) -The Trump administration is considering a plan to reallocate at least $2 billion from the CHIPS Act to fund critical minerals projects and boost Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick's influence over the strategic sector, two sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.

The proposed move would take from funds already allocated by Congress for semiconductor research and chip factory construction, avoiding a fresh spending request as it seeks to reduce U.S. dependence on China for critical minerals used widely in the electronics and defense industries.

Boosting Lutnick's role over critical minerals financing would also help centralize the administration's approach to the sector, a push sought by White House officials after the rollout of the Pentagon investment in rare earths company MP Materials last month sparked questions about the U.S. government's minerals strategy, one source said.

The White House did not respond to requests for comment. Pentagon officials were not immediately available to comment. MP Materials declined to comment.


The Commerce Department oversees the $52.7 billion CHIPS Act, formally known as the CHIPS and Science Act. The act, signed into law by then-President Joe Biden in 2022, has provided funding so far for research while also seeking to lure chip production away from Asia and boost American domestic semiconductor production.

But since taking office in January, Trump has moved to change the CHIPS Act - legislation he has called "a horrible, horrible thing" that amounts to a giveaway to companies - largely by renegotiating grants to chipmakers.

Repurposing some funds for mining-related projects would align in part with the spirit of the CHIPS Act as the semiconductor industry requires abundant supplies of germanium, gallium and other critical minerals over which China has tightened its market control, said the sources, who are not permitted to speak publicly about the deliberations.


"The administration is creatively trying to find ways to fund the critical minerals sector," said the first source. The plans are under discussion and could change, the sources added.

Mining companies themselves could benefit, but also processing and recycling firms. Most of the minerals considered critical by the U.S. government are not processed inside the country.

Kent Masters, CEO of North Carolina-based Albemarle, the world's largest producer of lithium for rechargeable batteries, told Reuters last month that the company's stalled plans to build a U.S. lithium refinery are "difficult now without some type of government support or partnership."


It was not immediately clear if the Trump administration aimed to use the funds for grants or equity stakes in mining companies, but Lutnick aims to "get the $2 billion out the door" as soon as possible, the first source said, adding that the administration aims to find other funds to reallocate in the near future.


A former U.S. official said the Biden administration considered using CHIPS Act grants for rare earths but decided it was uneconomical, required many environmental exemptions and was best left for the Department of Energy to handle.

The administration is also looking to use CHIPS Act-related funding to take equity stakes in Intel and other chip makers in exchange for cash grants, Reuters reported on Tuesday.

Trump moved quickly to expand U.S. critical minerals production since taking office in January by signing executive orders to boost deep-sea mining and domestic projects.

On Tuesday he met with the CEOs of Rio Tinto and BHP at the White House despite the ongoing negotiations with European leaders over Russia's invasion of Ukraine, a move aimed at underscoring his support for U.S. mining.


The CHIPS Act deliberations come after the Energy Department last week proposed $1 billion in spending for some critical minerals projects, with funds tied to the 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.

LUTNICK

The White House aims to give Lutnick a greater role over funding decisions for critical minerals by giving him oversight of the decision making process within the administration, the sources said.

The Pentagon's multibillion-dollar investment in MP Materials and its move to extend a price support mechanism - a deal negotiated by Deputy Defense Secretary Steve Feinberg - was seen by White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles as uncoordinated as it sparked confusion over whether Washington would guarantee a price floor for all miners and forced the administration to clarify that it does not intend for MP to have a rare earths monopoly, the two sources said.

Much of the funding for MP's deal - including Washington's equity stake, loans and purchase agreements - still needs to be allocated by Congress.

Two weeks after the Pentagon announced its MP investment, administration officials rushed to meet at the White House with rare earths firms and their customers to underscore broad support for the entire sector, Reuters reported.

Lutnick will now help coordinate the administration's funding decisions, taking the lead from the Pentagon and other agencies, the sources said.

Lutnick ran brokerage firm Cantor Fitzgerald before he joined Trump's cabinet. Cantor is a large shareholder in Critical Metals Corp, which Reuters reported in June is under consideration for a loan from the U.S. Export-Import Bank.

(Reporting by Ernest Scheyder and Jarrett Renshaw; additional reporting by Alexandra Alper; Editing by Chris Sanders, Veronica Brown Alistair Bell)


US Supreme Court lets Trump administration cut $783 million of research funding in anti-DEI push



LINDSAY WHITEHURST
Thu, August 21, 2025



WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration can slash hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of research funding in its push to cut federal diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, the Supreme Court decided Thursday.

The split court lifted a judge’s order blocking $783 million worth of cuts made by the National Institutes of Health to align with Republican President Donald Trump’s priorities.

The court split 5-4 on the decision. Chief Justice John Roberts was among those who wouldn't have allowed the cuts, along with the court’s three liberals. The high court did keep the Trump administration's anti-DEI directive blocked for future funding with a key vote from Justice Amy Coney Barrett, however.

The decision marks the latest Supreme Court win for Trump and allows the administration to forge ahead with canceling hundreds of grants while the lawsuit continues to unfold. The plaintiffs say the decision is a “significant setback for public health,” but keeping the directive blocked means the administration can't use it to cut more studies.

The Justice Department, meanwhile, has said funding decisions should not be “subject to judicial second-guessing” and efforts to promote policies referred to as DEI can “conceal insidious racial discrimination.”

The lawsuit addresses only part of the estimated $12 billion of NIH research projects that have been cut, but in its emergency appeal, the Trump administration also took aim at nearly two dozen other times judges have stood in the way of its funding cuts.

Solicitor General D. John Sauer said judges shouldn’t be considering those cases under an earlier Supreme Court decision that cleared the way for teacher-training program cuts that the administration also linked to DEI. He says they should go to federal claims court instead.

Five conservative justices agreed, and Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote a short opinion in which he criticized lower-court judges for not adhering to earlier high court orders. “All these interventions should have been unnecessary,” Gorsuch wrote.

The plaintiffs, 16 Democratic state attorneys general and public-health advocacy groups, had unsuccessfully argued that research grants are fundamentally different from the teacher-training contracts and couldn’t be sent to the claims court.

They said that defunding studies midway through halts research, ruins data already collected and ultimately harms the country’s potential for scientific breakthroughs by disrupting scientists’ work in the middle of their careers.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote a lengthy dissent in which she criticized both the outcome and her colleagues' willingness to continue allowing the administration to use the court's emergency appeals process.

“This is Calvinball jurisprudence with a twist. Calvinball has only one rule: There are no fixed rules. We seem to have two: that one, and this Administration always wins,” she wrote, referring to the fictional game in the comic strip “Calvin and Hobbes.”


In June, U.S. District Judge William Young in Massachusetts had ruled that the cancellations were arbitrary and discriminatory. “I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this,” Young, an appointee of Republican President Ronald Reagan, said at a hearing. He later added: “Have we no shame.”

An appeals court had left Young’s ruling in place.





DESANTISLAND
Pulse Memorial's rainbow crosswalk removed overnight in Orlando, Florida

Brooke Sopelsa
Thu, August 21, 2025 


Pulse Memorial's rainbow crosswalk removed overnight in Orlando, Florida

A rainbow crosswalk in Orlando, Florida, that was part of the city’s Pulse Memorial was painted over by the state late Wednesday night.

The memorial honored the 49 people fatally shot by a gunman at the Pulse LGBTQ nightclub in 2016, in what was the largest mass shooting in the country at the time.

Orlando Mayor Buddy Dyer criticized the removal of the crosswalk on social media, calling it a “cruel political act.”

“We are devastated to learn that overnight the state painted over the Pulse Memorial crosswalk on Orange Avenue,” he wrote. “This crosswalk not only enhanced safety and visibility for the large number of pedestrians visiting the memorial, it also served as a visual reminder of Orlando’s commitment to honor the 49 lives taken.”



Dyer added that the crosswalk adheres to safety standards and was actually installed by the state. It was created in 2017.


Brandon Wolf, one of the Pulse shooting’s surviving victims, said the removal was a desecration of the deceased victims’ memories.

“In the dark of night, they came to erase our show of solidarity, our declaration that we will never forget,” Wolf wrote on X. “The cowards who feel threatened by our lives should feel lucky they didn’t have to bury the ones they love — then watch the state come & desecrate their memory.”



Gov. Ron DeSantis commented Thursday afternoon on X. In response to a video of Democratic state Sen. Carlos Guillermo Smith criticizing the rainbow crosswalk’s removal, DeSantis wrote: "We will not allow our state roads to be commandeered for political purposes."

The state Transportation Department and DeSantis' office did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The crosswalk’s removal follows a directive last month from President Donald Trump’s transportation secretary, Sean Duffy. On July 1, Duffy sent a letter to all 50 states, along with Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico, about roadway safety that stressed “consistent” roadway markings that are “free from distractions.” In a social media post that same day, Duffy shared the letter along with a message taking direct aim at rainbow crosswalks, which are typically intended to symbolize LGBTQ Pride.

“Taxpayers expect their dollars to fund safe streets, not rainbow crosswalks,” he wrote. “Political banners have no place on public roads. I’m reminding recipients of @USDOT roadway funding that it’s limited to features advancing safety, and nothing else. It’s that simple.”


This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
























 

Gene sequencing uncovers differences in wild and domesticated crops



Can understanding these differences help researchers breed better crops suited for a changing climate?



Hiroshima University

An overview of meta-analysis of wild and cultivated crop species 

image: 

This diagram illustrates the methodology of a meta-analysis comparing gene expression data between wild relatives and domesticated species. Using public gene expression databases and computer-based methods, researchers analyzed data from rice, tomato, and soybean to identify differentially expressed genes and common expression changes associated with domestication.

view more 

Credit: Makoto Yumiya, Hiroshima University






With climate change and more frequent extreme weather events, researchers predict that global yields of important crops like maize, rice, and soybeans could decline by 12 to 20% by the end of the century. To prepare, plant scientists are hoping to find ways to improve yields and grow hardier varieties of these crops. New insights into the genetic makeup of wild varieties of common crops show how domestication has changed crop traits over time and propose a new cultivation method to improve genetic diversity. The research was shared in a paper published in Life on July 11.

“While domesticated species have originally been bred by cultivating wild species, the resulting reduction in genetic diversity can damage all individuals by exposing them to diseases and environmental stresses. To solve this problem, we set out to identify differences in crop traits between wild relatives and domesticated species and to contribute to the selection of new breeding candidate genes. The introduction of useful traits, especially those found in wild relatives, may provide hints for the development of new useful varieties,” said Hidemasa Bono, a professor at Hiroshima University’s Graduate School of Integrated Sciences for Life in Hiroshima, Japan.

The researchers used RNA sequencing data from public databases, including the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus and published studies online. They focused on crops with wild relatives that had widely available RNA sequencing data: tomatoes, rice, and soybeans. The gene expression data of the wild varieties was then compared to the domesticated varieties. To evaluate the data, researchers classified all genes into three groups: upregulated, unchanged, and downregulated.

By understanding the gene expression comparison between the wild varieties and the domesticated varieties, researchers could understand differences in how the plants respond to stressors. “Wild relatives have high environmental stress tolerance with the potential to respond to climate change and severe changes in the natural environment, which has been an issue in recent years,” said Bono.

The researchers found 18 genes that were upregulated in the wild relatives and 36 genes that were upregulated in the domesticated species. Wild species were found to have genes related to environmental stress responses while domesticated species had more genes related to the hormone regulation and chemical compound export and detoxification. For example, a gene called HKT1 affects salt stress response and salt tolerance was found to be upregulated in wild varieties. This could be an opportunity to develop crops that can grow in soil with more saline. Researchers also found genes that were upregulated in wild varieties that helped with drought stress (RD22), water stress (HB-12), leaf development and photosynthesis promotion (HB-7), and osmotic stress response and wound signaling (MYB102).

In domesticated plants, researchers also found beneficial genes that were upregulated compared to wild varieties. Several genes help detox the plants and remove chemicals found in soil. One gene (ALF5) improves the plant’s resistance to tetramethylammonium, and another (DTX1) manages cadmium and toxic compounds. These genes and others can help plants grow in soils that have been contaminated by chemicals. Researchers suspect this may have become beneficial for plants because of increased pesticide and chemical fertilizer use.

“The three wild species used in this analysis—rice, tomato, and soybean—had in common high expression levels of genes that contribute to stress responses, such as drought, osmotic pressure, and wound stress. The high expression levels of genes that contribute to stress tolerance that these three less closely related species have in common suggest that wild species of other species are likely to have useful traits as well,” said Bono.

Looking ahead, researchers hope to learn even more about these essential differences between wild relatives and domesticated species to improve breeding. “In addition, we would like to collect and reanalyze data used in crop breeding research to construct a database that will contribute to the promotion of digital breeding of crops,” said Bono.

###

The other contributor to this research was Makoto Yumiya of the Graduate School of Integrated Sciences for Life at Hiroshima University.

The Center for Bio-Digital Transformation (BioDX), COI-NEXT, and the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) supported this research. 

This paper received funding from Hiroshima University to cover open access fees.

About Hiroshima University

Since its foundation in 1949, Hiroshima University has striven to become one of the most prominent and comprehensive universities in Japan for the promotion and development of scholarship and education. Consisting of 12 schools for undergraduate level and 5 graduate schools, ranging from natural sciences to humanities and social sciences, the university has grown into one of the most distinguished comprehensive research universities in Japan. English website: https://www.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/en